Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:46:12.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in ionic concentrations and δ18O in the snowpack of Zhadang glacier, Nyainqentanglha mountain, southern Tibetan Plateau

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Kang Shichang ,
Huang Jie  and
Xu Yanwei
Kang Shichang
Affiliation:
Nam Co Station for Multisphere Observation and Research, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China E-mail:[email protected] State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
Huang Jie
Affiliation:
Nam Co Station for Multisphere Observation and Research, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China E-mail:[email protected]
Xu Yanwei
Affiliation:
Nam Co Station for Multisphere Observation and Research, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China E-mail:[email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To investigate the effects of depositional and post-depositional processes on chemical records in the snowpack, seven monthly snow pits were sampled at the same site on the pass of Zhadang (ZD) glacier (30˚28.079' N, 90˚39.032' E; 5800ma.s.l.), Nyainqentanglha mountain, southern Tibetan Plateau, between April and October 2006. Meteorological data from an automatic weather station at the sampling site showed that the annual mean air temperature was –5.6˚C on the pass and that monthly air temperature was above 0˚C from June to August, indicating that snowmelt could occur in this high-elevation region during the summer. An analysis of δ18O and major-ion variability in snow pits suggests that glaciochemical recordswere influenced by both meltwater percolation in mid-summer (July and August) and seasonal deposition. Less negative δ18O values and high concentrations of major ions occurred during the spring. The trends of δ18O variations in the ZD snow pits were consistent with those in precipitation sampled at the nearby Nam Co station for all months except for July and August, suggesting that climate signals are well preserved in the snow-pit δ18O records during the non-summer months. However, these climate signals were destroyed by strong percolation of meltwater during mid-summer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Annals of Glaciology , Volume 49 , 2008 , pp. 127 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) [year] 2008

Introduction

Chemical records from ice cores are a valuable source of information for interpreting paleoclimatic change. Not only are the atmospheric chemical composition and depositional processes recorded, but post-depositional processes within the snow–firn stratum, especially when snowmelt occurs, are also recorded (Reference ThompsonThompson and others 1995; Reference GinotGinot, 2001; Reference PatersonLi and others, 2006). However, when meltwater percolates through the previous seasonal layers, the glaciochemical signals can be significantly altered (Reference Huang, Li, Hou and PuHuang and others, 1996; Reference Hou and QinHou and Qin, 1999; Reference Eichler, Schwikowski and GäggelerEichler and others, 2001; Reference Hou and QinHou and others, 2002).

Research focused on climate change as reconstructed by ice-core records in the southern Tibetan Plateau has taken place over the past decade (e.g. Reference Thompson, Yao, Mosley-Thompson, Davis, Henderson and LinThompson and others, 2000; Reference KangKang and others, 2002a, Reference Kang2006, Reference Kang2007; Reference QinQin and others, 2002; Reference Yao, Thompson, Mosley-Thompson, Zhihong, Xing-ping and LinYao and others, 2002; Reference HouHou and others, 2007). Recent meteorological observations in the upper glacier area on Qomolangma (Mount Everest) show that the daily maximum air temperature during summer was above 0˚C, indicating that snowmelt might occur during the summer at high elevations where ice cores have been retrieved (Reference WangXie and others, 2007). Therefore, investigating the effect of summer meltwater percolation on glaciochemical signals is crucial to the accurate interpretation of ice-core records in the region. Additionally, accurate dating of ice cores is essential to the reconstruction of ice-core climatic records. A primary dating method is based on seasonal variations in chemical species. To validate seasonal timings of chemical species, it is necessary to establish the input timing. Snow-pit studies provide a useful tool to investigate such properties (Reference PatersonMayewski and others, 1990; Reference PatersonKreutz and others, 1999; Reference KangKang and others, 2004; Reference Wake, Mayewski, Xie, Wang and LiWake and others, 2004; Reference Xu, Kang, Zhou, Cong, Chi and ZhangYalcin and others, 2006).

The meteorological and pluviometric regime of the Asian continent is controlled mainly by polar air masses from the Arctic, continental air masses from central Asia and maritime air masses from the Pacific and Indian Oceans (Reference BrysonBryson, 1986). The location of Zhadang (ZD) glacier, Nyainqentanglha mountain (30˚28' N, 90˚39' E) (Fig. 1) at the boundary of the South Asian monsoon (Indian monsoon) and the continental climate of central Asia, combined with the high elevation (5800 m), offers a unique opportunity to describe and understand changes in climate and the chemistry of the atmosphere over the Tibetan Plateau.

Fig. 1. Location map of sampling site on the pass of ZD glacier and Nam Co station, Nyainqentanglha mountain, southern Tibetan Plateau.

To investigate the effects of depositional and post-depositional processes on chemical species within the snow–firn pack, snow samples were collected once a month from snow pits at the same site on the pass of ZD glacier from April to October 2006. Meteorological data were also recorded at the sampling site by an automatic weather station (AWS). Precipitation samples were collected from each precipitation event at the Nam Co Station for Multisphere Observation and Research (hereafter Nam Co station) about 50 km away from the ZD pass (Fig. 1). The purpose of this study is to understand the seasonality of δ18O and major ions and the effects of meltwater percolation on glaciochemical records on the pass of ZD glacier. This is achieved by comparing monthly changes of δ18O and major-ion concentrations in snow pits, as well as δ18O values between snow pits and precipitation at Nam Co station. This research provides the basis for further interpretation of ice-core records in the region.

Methods

Between April and October 2006, snow pits were sampled to the glacial ice surface once a month (for a total of seven snow pits) at the same site on the pass of ZD glacier on the east of Nyainqentanglha (Fig. 1). The snow pits were sampled at 5 cm intervals on the wall of the snow pits, for a total of 137 samples. Detailed summaries of snow pits are located in Table 1. Extreme care was taken during sample collection and handling to ensure samples were not contaminated. Non-particulating suits, polyethylene gloves and masks were worn during sampling. Pre-washed, high-density polyethylene (HDPE) containers were used as sample scoops (Reference Kang, Mayewski, Qin, Sneed, Ren and ZhangKang and others, 2004). Field blanks were collected, filled with ultrapure water in the laboratory, opened during sample collection and handled as samples. Samples were kept frozen in the field, during transport and in the laboratory until analysis. All samples were analyzed at the Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Major cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+ and NH4 +) were analyzed by a Dionex ISC 2000 ion chromatograph using an IonPac CS12A column, 20 mM MSA (methanesulfonic acid) eluent and CSRS suppressor. Major anions (Cl–, NO3 –and SO4 2–) were analyzed by a Dionex ISC 2500 ion chromatograph using an IonPac AS11-HC column, 25 mM KOH eluent and anion self-regenerating suppressor. The detection limits were 1 ng g–1 for all ions. Analysis of field blanks showed that contamination during the sampling procedure, transport and treatment was negligible. Oxygen isotope analyses were performed with a method based on isotopic equilibrium exchange between oxygen of CO2 with a known isotopic composition and the water sample using an IR-MS (Thermo Finnigan MAT-253; ±0.2%precision). All data are reported in standard delta (d) notation vs Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (V-SMOW).

Table 1. Information of snow pits at ZD glacier during 2006 (average δ18O values and major-ion concentrations, with ± for standard deviation)

Results and Discussion

Air temperature and snow stratigraphy at sampling site

Variability of daily and monthly air temperatures on the pass of ZD glacier is presented in Figure 2. The annual mean air temperature was –5.6˚C and the monthly average temperature was 0.2˚C in June, 1.2˚C in July and 0.2˚C in August. The daily maximum temperatures were above 0˚C from May to September, indicating that snowmelt could occur in this high-elevation region during the summer. However, daily minimum temperatures were still below 0˚C throughout the summer (Fig. 2), suggesting that meltwater might refreeze during the night.

Fig. 2. Variation of air temperature on the pass of ZD glacier during 2006.

Snow-pit stratigraphy of each snow pit is presented in Figure 3. As mentioned above, the bottom of each snow pit reached the glacier ice surface. The snow pits mainly consisted of firn, although SP8 (August) consisted of coarse-grained firn, indicating meltwater percolation that contributes to fast snow deformation (Reference PatersonPaterson, 1994). The deepest snow pit occurred in May (SP5), prior to the summer ablation season.

Fig. 3. Stratigraphies of snow pits on the pass of ZD glacier during April to October 2006 (for details of SP4 to SP10 see Table 1).

Variability of δ18O in snowpack

Comparisons of variations of δ18O with depth in snow pits and precipitation at Nam Co station are presented in Figures 4 and 5. With the exception of SP7 (July) and SP8 (August), fluctuations of δ18O are clearly visible. Average δ18O values in spring (e.g. May) and autumn (e.g. September) were more negative than those in mid-summer (Table 1), and standard deviations of each snow pit (Table 1) also showed small values during July and August. This suggests that the most intensive elution was caused by percolating meltwater due to high air temperatures as indicated by the automatic weather station (Fig. 2), resulting in reduced or smoothed isotopic value oscillations (Fig. 4). Previous research has reported that when air temperatures are high, the original δ18Ooscillations in snow pits may be rapidly altered in the presence of percolating meltwater (e.g. Reference ÁrnasonÁrnason, 1969; Reference P. and TheakstoneRaben and others, 1998; Reference HouHou and others, 2002; Reference Wake, Mayewski, Kang, Cecil, Green and ThompsonWang and others, 2006).

Fig. 4. Variation of δ18O values with depth in snow pits on the pass of ZD glacier from April to October 2006 (for details of SP4 to SP10 see Table 1).

Therefore, the elution process of meltwater on the pass of ZD glacier clearly has affected the original δ18O signals, at least during July and August.

Comparisons of δ18O variations between snow pits and precipitation at Nam Co station were performed (Fig. 5). At the station, observed minimum δ18O in precipitation occurred on 11 March, coinciding with the minimum δ18O value at 35 cm depth in SP4. There were no observed precipitation events at the station from 11 March to 13 April, but snowfall occurred in the glacier region during this time (Fig. 5). In SP5, the minimum δ18O value at 115cm depth was preserved, consistent with the snowfall event on 11 March at the station. The position of the minimum δ18O value moved downward in SP5, mainly as a result of the heavy snowfall in the glacier region in May and of snow compaction.

Fig. 5. Comparisons of δ18O variations between snow pits from ZD glacier and precipitation at Nam Co station (for details of SP4 to SP10 see Table 1).

The variability of δ18O was smoothed slightly, as shown in SP6 (Fig. 4); however, the seasonal trend of δ18O in the snow pit was similar to that in precipitation at the station (Fig. 5). It is clear that less negative δ18O occurred in May and early June, as observed from both the glacier region and station. Due to the meltwater percolation, variability of δ18O in SP7 and SP8 was smoothed and no similarities with precipitation δ18O from the station found. The effects of intensive elution during the day from above-freezing temperatures (Fig. 2) could cause the complete change of the original chemical signals recorded in snow pits (e.g. Reference P. and TheakstoneRaben and others, 1998; Reference Eichler, Schwikowski and GäggelerEichler and others, 2001; Reference HouHou and Qin, 2002; Reference PatersonLi and others, 2006).

In SP9 and SP10, variations of δ18O were consistent with those at the station. Notably, the most negative δ18O values appeared at 50 cm and 64cm depth in SP9 and SP10, respectively, consistent with the extreme δ18O value of the precipitation event on 27 August at the station. Daily maximum air temperature decreased below 0˚C from September and new precipitation in the snowpack was preserved due to minimal effects of meltwater percolation. In summary, δ18O records in snow pits were strongly influenced by meltwater percolation only during July and August, at least in 2006. This suggests that the selection of future ice-coring sites in the region, and the interpretation of ice-core records from this region, should consider the percolation effects on glaciochemical records.

During the summer, the climate in the southern Tibetan Plateau is dominated by the Indian summer monsoon. The southern airflow extends to about 35 ˚N, and brings warm– humid air masses from the Indian Ocean to the southern Tibetan Plateau (Reference PatersonMurakami, 1987; Reference Tang, M., G. and LinTang, 1998; Reference Tian, Masson-Delmotte, Stievenard, Yao and JouzelTian and others, 2001 a). Variations of monthly mean δ18O in precipitation are dominated by the amount effect in the southern plateau (e.g. Reference Wake, Mayewski, Kang, Cecil, Green and ThompsonWake and Stievenard, 1995; Reference Kang, Qin, Yao and DuanKang and others, 2000a; Reference Tian, Yao and PuTian and others, 2001b). In the northern plateau, moisture source and air temperature affect the spatial distribution and temporal fluctuations of δ18O, respectively (Reference Yalcin, Wake, Kang, Kreutz and WhitlowYao and others, 1991, Reference Yao, Ding and Pu1996). Therefore, seasonal variations of δ18O in snow pits and precipitation show more negative δ18O values during the summer monsoon season and less negative δ18O values in spring (or the pre-monsoon season) in the southern regions of the plateau (Reference Tian, Yao and PuTian and others, 1997, Reference Tian, Masson-Delmotte, Stievenard, Yao and Jouzel2001b; Reference Kang, Wake, Qin, Mayewski and YaoKang and others, 2002b). Our results show that less negative δ18O values appeared during April to early June (SP4, SP5 and SP6 in Fig. 5), consistent with previous research. Although very negative δ18O values occurred in August at both the station and snow pits (SP9 and SP10), there were still some less negative δ18O values in July and September when the climatic condition is considered to be the summer monsoon season (Reference YaoYou and others, 2007). By analyzing air-mass backward trajectories, Reference Xie, J., Qin and KangXu and others (2007) found that moisture from both the Indian monsoon and local lake evaporation influenced the Nam Co region during summer. Furthermore, moisture transported by the monsoon had more negative δ18O values, whereas precipitation from more local sources had less negative δ18O, as observed at Nam Co station (Reference Xie, J., Qin and KangXu and others, 2007) and other sites on the plateau (Reference Yalcin, Wake, Kang, Kreutz and WhitlowYao and others, 1991; Reference Kang, Kreutz, Mayewski, Qin and YaoKang and others, 2002b). This could account for the less negative δ18O values during the summer.

Variabilities of major ions in snowpack

Average concentrations of major ions in the snow pits (Table 1) suggest that the highest major-ion concentrations occurred during spring (SP4, SP5 and SP6), with the highest values for most ions in SP5. As Figure 5 shows, most of the snow in SP5 accumulated during spring (March to May), reflecting the high ionic concentrations in spring snow. Previous research showed that major ions (e.g. Ca2+, Mg2+, SO4 2–) in snow over the southern Tibetan Plateau and Himalaya had a clear seasonal difference: non-monsoon ionic concentrations are much higher than monsoon ionic concentrations (e.g. Reference Wake and StiévenardWake and others, 1993; Reference Kang, Kreutz, Mayewski, Qin and YaoKang and others, 2000b, Reference Kang, Mayewski, Qin, Sneed, Ren and Zhang2004; Reference PatersonMarinoni and others, 2001; Reference Shrestha, Wake, Dibb and WhitlowShrestha and others, 2002). The snow chemistry is strongly influenced by crustal aerosols from local or arid (semi-arid) regions, especially during dust-storm periods in the non-monsoon seasons (e.g. winter and spring) (Reference PatersonQian and others, 1997; Reference Song, Han, Zhang, Xi and YeSong and others, 2004). High ionic concentrations in spring snow at ZD Glacier are consistent with previous results, and probably reflect the high loading of dust aerosols during spring in the region (Reference Song, Han, Zhang, Xi and YeSong and others, 2004; Reference PatersonLi and others, 2007).

Ionic concentrations in the snow pits decreased during the summer season (SP7 and SP8). Low ionic concentrations were also observed in Himalayan snow during the summer monsoon season (e.g. Reference Kang, Wake, Qin, Mayewski and YaoKang and others, 2000b, Reference Kang, Mayewski, Qin, Sneed, Ren and Zhang2004). Our results in ZD glacier snow pits could be caused by both low dust aerosols in the atmosphere (Reference PatersonLi and others, 2007) and meltwater percolation during the summer, especially in July and August. The effect of meltwater percolation on ionic concentrations is shown in Figure 6. Peaks of δ18O, which corresponded with the high ionic concentrations, were clearly presented in SP4 and SP10. However, the spring δ18O profile was destroyed by percolation and there is no counterpart of δ18O peaks with ionic peaks in SP7 and SP8. It is noteworthy that different ion peaks corresponded to each other very well in the bottom of SP7, but that these peaks vanished in SP8. This phenomenon could be explained by elution processes, in which the percolation of meltwater resulted in the accumulation and washout of major ions (Fig. 6) (Reference Hou and QinHou and Qin, 1999). Additionally, a phase discrepancy existed among ionic peaks in SP8, which could be primarily interpreted as the original ionic peaks modified to various degrees due to their varied stability against meltwater percolation (Reference Brimblecombe, S.L., Davies, Shooter and TranterBrimblecombe and others, 1987; Hou and Reference QinQin, 2002).

Fig. 6. Variation of δ18O values and major-ion concentrations with depth in snow pits on the pass of ZD glacier from April to October 2006 (for details of SP4 to SP10 see Table 1; dashed lines represent corresponding peaks among species).

Conclusions

A monthly glaciochemical survey at the pass of ZD glacier was conducted by analyzing δ18O and major ions in seven snow pits between April and October 2006. Our discussion has also incorporated results from the δ18O in precipitation at Nam Co station. The annual mean air temperature was –5.6˚C at the pass, and monthly air temperature was above 0˚C from June to August, indicating that snowmelt might occur in this high-elevation region during the summer. The variability of δ18O and major ions in snow pits was clearly influenced by the percolation of meltwater in mid-summer (July and August), and atmospheric concentrations during other seasons. Less negative δ18O values and high concentrations of major ions occurred during the spring.

The trends of δ18O variations in the ZD snow pits were consistent with those in precipitation at Nam Co station, with the exception of July and August. This suggests that climate signals were preserved well in the snow-pit δ18O records during the non-summer months; however, during summer these climate signals were destroyed by strong percolation of meltwater. Although our observations were carried out for only 1 year, the phenomenon that glaciochemical records could be affected by meltwater percolation at high-elevation sites (e.g. 5800ma.s.l.) should be considered when selecting ice-core sites and when interpreting ice-core records from such sites.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (40771187), the National Basic Research Program of China (2005CB422004) and the ‘Talent Project’ of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The authors acknowledge Maohui Liang and Ciren Duojie for arduous sampling work, as well as Dongmei Qu, Zhiyuan Cong, Chaoliu Li, Qinglong You, Qianggong Zhang, S. Kaspari and B. Grigholm for great help.

References

Árnason, B. 1969. The exchange of hydrogen isotopes between ice and water in temperate glaciers. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 6(6), 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brimblecombe, P., S.L., Clegg, Davies, T.D., Shooter, D. and Tranter, M.. 1987. Observations of the preferential loss of major ions from melting snow and laboratory ice. Water Res., 21(10), 1279–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, R.A. 1986. Airstream climatology of Asia. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Qinghai–Xizang Plateau and Mountain Meteorology, 20–24 March 1984, Beijing, China. Boston, MA, American Meteorological Society, 604–617.Google Scholar
Eichler, A., Schwikowski, M. and Gäggeler, H.W.. 2001. Meltwater-induced relocation of chemical species in Alpine firn. Tellus, 53B(2), 192–203.Google Scholar
Ginot, P. 2001. Glaciochemical study of ice cores from Andean glaciers. (PhD thesis, University of Bern.)Google Scholar
Hou, S. and Qin, D.. 1999. The ion elution effect on the main ion profiles of the glacier snowpacks. Chinese J. Geogr. Sci., 19(6), 536–542. [In Chinese with English summary.]Google Scholar
Hou, S. and Qin, D.. 2002. The effect of postdepositional process on the chemical profiles of snow pits in the percolation zone. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 34(2), 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, S.. and 6 others. 2002. Comparison of two ice-core chemical records recovered from the Qomolangma (Mount Everest) region, Himalaya. Ann. Glaciol., 35, 266–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C., Li, Z., Hou, S. and Pu, J.. 1996. The effect of ion elution on the formation of ice core records. Chinese Sci. Bull., 41(23), 2171–2173. [In Chinese.]Google Scholar
Kang, S., Qin, D., Yao, T. and Duan, K.. 2000a. Characteristics of δ18O in precipitation during summer monsoon season in high elevation of the Dasuopu Glacier, Mount Xixabangma. J. of M. Sci. [China], 55(1), 55–65. [In Chinese with English summary.]Google Scholar
Kang, S., Wake, C.P., Qin, D., Mayewski, P.A. and Yao, T.. 2000b. Monsoon and dust signals recorded in Dasuopu glacier, Tibetan Plateau. J. Glaciol., 46(153), 222–226.Google Scholar
Kang, S. and 7 others. 2002a. Glaciochemical records from a Mt Everest ice core: relationship to atmospheric circulation over Asia. Atmos. Environ., 36(21), 3351–3361.Google Scholar
Kang, S., Kreutz, K.J., Mayewski, P.A., Qin, D. and Yao, T.. 2002b. Stable-isotopic composition of precipitation over the northern slope of the central Himalaya. J. Glaciol., 48(163), 519–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, S.C., Mayewski, P.A., Qin, D.H., Sneed, S.A., Ren, J.W. and Zhang, D.Q.. 2004. Seasonal differences in snow chemistry from the vicinity of Mt. Everest, central Himalayas. Atmos. Environ., 38(18), 2819–2829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, S. and 7 others. 2006. Relationships between an ice core record from southern Tibetan Plateau and atmospheric circulation over Asia. Quat. Sci., 26(2), 153–164. [In Chinese with English summary.]Google Scholar
Kang, S. and 6 others. 2007. Recent temperature increase recorded in an ice core in the source region of Yangtze River. Chinese Sci. Bull., 52(6), 825–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreutz, K.J. and 11 others. 1999. Seasonal variations of glaciochemical, isotopic and stratigraphic properties in Siple Dome (Antarctica) surface snow. Ann. Glaciol., 29, 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z. and 9 others. 2006. Seasonal variability of ionic concentrations in surface snow and elution processes in snow–firn packs at the PGPI site on Ürümqi glacier No. 1, eastern Tien Chan, China. Ann. Glaciol., 43, 250–256.Google Scholar
Li, C., Kang, S., Zhang, Q. and Kaspari, S.. 2007. Major ionic composition of precipitation in the Nam Co region, Central Tibetan Plateau. Atmos. Res., 85(3–4), 351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinoni, A., Polesello, S., Smiraglia, C. and Valsecchi, S.. 2001. Chemical composition of fresh snow samples from the southern slope of Mt. Everest region (Khumbu-Himal region, Nepal). Atmos. Environ., 35(18), 3183–3190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayewski, P.A., Spencer, M.J., Twickler, M.S. and Whitlow, S.. 1990. A glaciochemical survey of the Summit region, Greenland. Ann. Glaciol., 14, 186–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murakami, T. 1987. Effect of the Tibetan Plateau. In Chang, C.P. and T.N. Krishnamurti, eds. Monsoon meteorology. New York, etc., Oxford University Press, 235–270.Google Scholar
Paterson, W.S.B. 1994. The physics of glaciers. Third edition. Oxford, etc., Elsevier.Google Scholar
Qian, Z., X., Hui and Qu, Z.. 1997. Investigation report and analysis on the super strong dust storm occurring on May 5, 1993. In Fang, Z. and Qian, Z., eds. Dust storms in China. Beijing, Meteorological Press. [In Chinese.]Google Scholar
Qin, D. and 6 others. 2002. Preliminary results from the chemical records of an 80.4m ice core recovered from East Rongbuk Glacier, Qomolangma (Mount Everest), Himalaya. Ann. Glaciol., 35, 278–284.Google Scholar
P., Raben and Theakstone, W.H.. 1998. Changes of ionic and oxygen isotopic composition of the snowpack at the glacier Austre Okstindbreen, Norway, 1995. Nord. Hydrol., 29(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Shrestha, A.B., Wake, C.P., Dibb, J.E. and Whitlow, S.I.. 2002. Aerosol and precipitation chemistry at a remote Himalayan site in Nepal. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 36(4), 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, L., Han, Y., Zhang, Q., Xi, X. and Ye, Y.. 2004. Monthly temporal–spatial distribution of sandstorms in China as well as the origin of Kosa in Japan and Korea. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 28(6), 820–827. [In Chinese with English summary.]Google Scholar
Tang, M. 1998. Formation, evolution and variability characteristics of the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau monsoon. In M., Tang, G., Chen and Lin, Z., eds. Recent climate change on the Tibet Plateau and its effects on the environment. Guangzhou, Science and Technology Press in Guangdong Province, 161–182. [In Chinese.]Google Scholar
Thompson, L.G. and 6 others. 1995. A 1000 year climatic ice-core record from the Guliya ice cap, China: its relationship to global climate variability. Ann. Glaciol., 21, 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, L.G., Yao, T., Mosley-Thompson, E., Davis, M.E., Henderson, K.A. and Lin, P.. 2000. A high-resolution millennial record of the south Asian monsoon from Himalayan ice cores. Science, 289(5486), 1916–1919.Google ScholarPubMed
Tian, L., Yao, T. and Pu, J.. 1997. Characteristic of δ18O in summer precipitation at Lhasa. J. Glaciol. Geocryol., 19(4), 295–301. [In Chinese with English summary.]Google Scholar
Tian, L., Masson-Delmotte, V., Stievenard, M., Yao, T. and Jouzel, J.. 2001b. Tibetan Plateau summer monsoon northward extent revealed by measurements of water stable isotopes. J. Geophys. Res., 106(D22), 28,081–28,088.Google Scholar
Tian, L., Yao, T. and Sun, W.. 2001 a. Relationship between δD and δ18O in precipitation on north and south of the Tibetan plateau and moisture recycling. Sci. China D, 31(3), 215–220.Google Scholar
Wake, C.P. and Stiévenard, M.. 1995. The amount effect and oxygen isotope ratios recorded in Himalayan snow. In Paleoclimate and environmental variability in AustralAsian transect during the past 2000 years. Nagoya, Nagoya University, 236–241.Google Scholar
Wake, C.P., Mayewski, P.A., Xie, Z., Wang, P. and Li, Z.. 1993. Regional distribution of monsoon and desert dust signals record in Asian glaciers. Geophys. Res. Lett., 20(14), 1411–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wake, C.P., Mayewski, P.A. and Kang, S.. 2004. Climatic interpretation of the gradient in glaciochemical signals across the crest of the Himalaya. In Cecil, L.D., Green, J.R. and Thompson, L.G., eds. Earth paleoenvironments; records preserved in mid- and low-latitude glaciers, Volume 9. Boston MA, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 81–94.Google Scholar
Wang, F. and 6 others. 2006. Seasonal evolution of aerosol stratigraphy in Ürümqi glacier No. 1 percolation zone, eastern Tien Shan, China. Ann. Glaciol., 43, 245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, A., J., Ren, Qin, X. and Kang, S.. 2007. Reliability of NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data in the Himalayas/Tibetan Plateau. J. Geogr. Sci., 17(4), 421–430.Google Scholar
Xu, Y., Kang, S., Zhou, S., Cong, Z., Chi, Y. and Zhang, Q.. 2007. Variations of δ18O in summer and autumn precipitation and their relationships with moisture source and air temperature in Nam Co Basin, Tibetan Plateau. Sci. Geogr. Sin., 27(5), 718–723. [In Chinsese with English summary.]Google Scholar
Yalcin, K., Wake, C.P., Kang, S., Kreutz, K.J. and Whitlow, S.I.. 2006. Seasonal and spatial variability in snow chemistry at Eclipse Icefield, Yukon, Canada. Ann. Glaciol., 43, 230–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, T., Ding, L. and Pu, J.. 1991. Characteristic of δ18O in snow and its relation with moisture sources in Tanggula Mountains, Tibetan Plateau. Chinese Sci. Bull., 36(20), 1570–1573. [In Chinese.]Google Scholar
Yao, T., Thompson, L.G., Mosley-Thompson, E., Zhihong, Y., Xing-ping, Z. and Lin, P.N.. 1996. Climatological significance of δ18O in north Tibetan ice cores. J. Geophys. Res., 101(D23), 29,531–29,537.Google Scholar
Yao, T. and 7 others. 2002. Temperature and methane changes over the past 1000 years recorded in Dasuopu glacier (central Himalaya) ice core. Ann. Glaciol., 35, 379–383.Google Scholar
You, Q., Kang, S., Li, C., Li, M. and Liu, J.. 2007. Variation features of meteorological parameters at the Nam Co Station, Tibetan Plateau. Meteorol. Monthly, 33(3), 54–60.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location map of sampling site on the pass of ZD glacier and Nam Co station, Nyainqentanglha mountain, southern Tibetan Plateau.

Figure 1

Table 1. Information of snow pits at ZD glacier during 2006 (average δ18O values and major-ion concentrations, with ± for standard deviation)

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Variation of air temperature on the pass of ZD glacier during 2006.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Stratigraphies of snow pits on the pass of ZD glacier during April to October 2006 (for details of SP4 to SP10 see Table 1).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Variation of δ18O values with depth in snow pits on the pass of ZD glacier from April to October 2006 (for details of SP4 to SP10 see Table 1).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Comparisons of δ18O variations between snow pits from ZD glacier and precipitation at Nam Co station (for details of SP4 to SP10 see Table 1).

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Variation of δ18O values and major-ion concentrations with depth in snow pits on the pass of ZD glacier from April to October 2006 (for details of SP4 to SP10 see Table 1; dashed lines represent corresponding peaks among species).