Introduction
The new mineral dmitryvarlamovite, Ti2(Fe3+Nb)O8, described in this paper, is related to the wolframite group which belongs to the columbite supergroup whose systematics and nomenclature have been approved recently (Chukanov et al., Reference Chukanov, Pasero, Aksenov, Britvin, Zubkova, Yike and Witzke2023a). In 1993, V.V. Likhachev carried out initial studies of dmitryvarlamovite and supposed that it may be a new mineral species with a wolframite-related structure (Likhachev, Reference Likhachev1993, p. 161). New data obtained in this work confirm this assumption.
Dmitryvarlamovite is named after Dmitry Anatol'evich Varlamov (b. 1965), Senior Researcher of the D.S. Korzhinskii Institute of Experimental Mineralogy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, a specialist in electron microprobe analyses, a coauthor of discoveries of ~20 new minerals and more than 110 articles in the fields of mineralogy and petrology.
Selection of the name ‘dmitryvarlamovite’ but not ‘varlamovite’ is because the names ‘varlamovite’ (Matveeva et al., Reference Matveeva, Chanturia, Gromova and Lantsova2018; Pautov et al., Reference Pautov, Mirakov, Shodibekov and Khvorov2018; Faуziev and Pirov (Reference Faуziev and Pirov2016), and ‘varlamoffite’ (Russell and Vincent, Reference Russell and Vincent1952; Bonnici et al., Reference Bonnici, Doucet, Goñi and Picot1964; Kato et al., Reference Kato, Shimizu and Matsuo1970; Sharko, Reference Sharko1971) were applied to a questionable mineral, X-ray amorphous Sn,Fe-hydroxyde, named in honour of the geologist Nicolas Varlamoff.
The new mineral and its name have been approved by the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification of the International Mineralogical Association (IMA2022-125a, Udoratina et al., Reference Udoratina, Panikirovskii, Chukanov, Voronin, Lutoev, Agakhanov and Isaenko2024). The holotype specimen is deposited in the collection of the Chernov Geological Museum of the Geological Institute, Komi Scientific Center, Uralian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Syktyvkar, Pervomayskaya Str., 54, with the catalogue number 317.
Experimental methods and data processing
In order to obtain infrared (IR) absorption spectra, powdered samples were mixed with KBr predried at 120°C, formed into a transparent pellet by pressurising the mix at 10 tons in a hydraulic jack for 3 min, and analysed using an ALPHA FTIR spectrometer (Bruker Optics) with a resolution of 4 cm–1. A total of sixteen scans were obtained for each spectrum. The IR spectrum of a pellet of pure KBr was used as a reference blank.
Raman spectroscopy investigation of dmitryvarlamovite was carried out at the Center of Collective Use «Geonauka» (IG Komi Scientific Center, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Syktyvkar) on a high-resolution LabRam HR800 spectrometer (Horiba Jobin Yvon). The system was equipped with an Olympus BX 41 optical microscope and Si-based CCD detector. A 50× objective (numerical aperture 0.50) was used. Spectra registration was performed using a spectrometer grating of 600 g/mm, with a confocal hole size of 300 μm, slit width of 100 μm, and 2 mW output radiation power of an onboard He–Ne laser (λ = 632.8 nm). The signal accumulation time was 10 s. The spectrum was recorded at room temperature and averaged over three measurements.
In order to obtain Mössbauer spectra, a powdered sample (49 mg) was mixed with paraffin, pressed into a tablet, and analysed using a MS-1104Em spectrometer (South Federal University, Rostov-on-Don) with a 57Co source in a rhodium matrix at room (295 K) temperature and at 90 K; α-Fe was used as a reference. The spectra were processed using the UnivemMS program (Brugeman, Reference Brugeman2009).
Quantitative reflectance measurements were performed in air relative to a WTiC standard by means of a Universal Microspectrophotometer UMSP 50 (Opton-Zeiss, Germany).
Electron microprobe analyses (6 spots) were obtained using a digital scanning electron microscope Tescan VEGA-II XMU equipped with an Oxford INCA Wave 700 spectrometer (WDS mode, 20 kV, 20 nA and 1 μm beam diameter).
Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) data were collected by means of a Rigaku «MiniFlex II» diffractometer in the 2θ range of 5–70°, with a scanning step of 0.02°, using CoKα radiation (λ = 1.788965 Å). The normal-focus Co X-ray tube was operated at 30 kV and 15 mA. The unit-cell parameters were calculated using the Unit Cell program (Holland and Redfern, Reference Holland and Redfern1997). Calculated intensities were obtained based on the atomic coordinates and unit-cell parameters by means of the VESTA program (Momma and Izumi, Reference Momma and Izumi2008).
The single-crystal XRD study was done using a XtaLAB Synergy-S diffractometer (Rigaku corp., Japan) equipped with a hybrid photon counting detector HyPix-6000HE using monochromatic MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073Å) at the Centre of the Collective Use of Equipment, Kola Science Centre. More than half of the diffraction sphere was collected with the scanning step of 1°, and exposure time of 0.5 to 1 s. The data were integrated and corrected by means of the CrysAlisPro program package (Agilent Technologies, 2014), which was also used to apply an empirical absorption correction using spherical harmonics, as implemented in the SCALE3 ABSPACK scaling algorithm. The crystal structure was solved using the SHELXT program (Sheldrick, Reference Sheldrick2015) without constraints. Illustrations were drawn using the VESTA 3 program (Momma and Izumi, Reference Momma and Izumi2008). The single-crystal XRD data are deposited in CCDC (https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/) under entry No. 2301326. Crystal data, data collection information and structure refinement details are given in Table 1.
Table 1. Crystal data and structure refinement for dmitryvarlamovite
Results
Occurrence, general appearance and physical properties
The holotype specimen of dmitryvarlamovite was collected from the bauxite-bearing weathering crust of the Verkhne-Shchugorskoe deposit, Middle Timan Mts., Russia (64°24′N, 51°04′E, borehole # 10855, depth 100 m). The associated minerals are columbite-(Fe), pyrochlore-group minerals, monazite-(Ce), xenotime-(Y), baryte, pyrite, drugmanite and plumbogummite. In some grains, dmitryvarlamovite is intergrown with columbite-(Fe) and an insufficiently studied Ti-deficient and Fe-rich columbite-supergroup mineral with the empirical formula Fe2+0.14Cr0.02V0.06Fe3+1.46Ti0.50Nb1.82O8 (presumably, rossovskyite, ideally Fe3+NbO4, or its dimorph isostructural with dmitryvarlamovite).
Dmitryvarlamovite is an accessory mineral of alkaline metasomatic assemblages formed after late Riphaean sedimentary carbonate rocks (Likhachev, Reference Likhachev1993). The new mineral occurs in relic veinlets 0.2 to 0.5 mm thick crossing the bauxite-bearing weathering crust. Rare-metal (Nb, Sr, LREE and Th) mineralisation was formed as a result of the interaction of an alkaline fluid related to the Kos'yusky complex of ultrabasic rocks and carbonatites with metasediments of the Bystrinskaya series (Nedosekova et. al., Reference Nedosekova, Vladykin, Udoratina and Belyatsky2021). The estimated metasomatosis temperature was ~450°C (Kulikova et al., Reference Kulikova, Udoratina, Makeev and Shuisky2022).
Dmitryvarlamovite forms anhedral equant grains up to 0.5 mm across (Fig. 1) as well as outer zones of some columbite grains – presumably, partial pseudomorphs after columbite (Fig. 2a) and intergrowths with rossovskyite or a Ti-deficient analogue of dmitryvarlamovite (Fig. 2b). There are distinct sharp borders between the dmitryvarlamovite, rossovskyite-like and columbite-(Fe) phases. Monazite-(Ce), xenotime-(Y) and baryte occur as rare microscopic inclusions in some dmitryvarlamovite grains.
Figure 1. Grains of dmitryvarlamovite, partly intergrown with columbite-(Fe) and the phase FeNbO4, extracted from bauxite. Field of view width: 2.5 mm. Photographer M.D. Mil'shina.
Figure 2. Associations of dmitryvarlamovite (Dmv) with monazite-(Ce) (Mnz-Ce), columbite-(Fe) (Clb-Fe) and a phase with the simplified formula FeNbO4 (presumably, rossovskyite dimorph isostructural with dmitryvarlamovite). Back-scattered electron images of polished sections. The abbreviations are after Warr (Reference Warr2021).
The colour of dmitryvarlamovite is black, the streak is black and the lustre is submetallic. The new mineral is brittle. The mean hardness measured by micro-indentation at a load of 50 g is 753 kg mm–2 (range 689–812, n = 5) which corresponds to the Mohs hardness of 6. No cleavage is observed. The fracture is conchoidal. Density calculated using the empirical formula and unit-cell volume refined from single-crystal XRD data is equal to 4.891 g⋅cm–3.
Infrared spectroscopy
The infrared (IR) spectrum of dmitryvarlamovite with admixtures of columbite-(Fe) and the phase FeNbO4 (Fig. 3) was obtained in order to confirm the absence of OH groups. In the range of 360–1500 cm–1, the spectrum is close to those of other partly disordered niobium members of the columbite supergroup, including rossovskyite (Konovalenko et al., Reference Konovalenko, Ananyev, Chukanov, Rastsvetaeva, Aksenov, Baeva, Gainov, Vagizov, Lopatin and Nebera2015), samarskite-(Y) (Chukanov and Vigasina, Reference Chukanov and Vigasina2020) and nioboixiolite-(Mn2+) (Chukanov et al., Reference Chukanov, Pekov, Zubkova, Yapaskurt, Shelukhina, Britvin and Pushcharovsky2023b). Bands in the IR spectra of these minerals are poorly resolved because of mixed occupancies of cation sites. IR absorption in the range of 400–800 cm–1 is due to stretching vibrations of the MO2 pseudo-framework (M = Nb, Fe3+, Ti, etc.). Taking into account that Fe3+ is a lower field-strength cation compared to Nb and Ti, the band at 480 cm–1 may be tentatively assigned to stretching vibrations of the Nb–O–Fe3+ fragment. The shoulder at 1105 cm–1 corresponds to an overtone. The shoulder at 750 cm–1 may correspond to admixed columbite-(Fe) (Chukanov and Chervonnyi, Reference Chukanov and Chervonnyi2014). The absence of absorption bands above 1200 cm–1 indicates the absence of H-, B- and C-bearing groups.
Figure 3. Powder infrared absorption spectra of: (a) dmitryvarlamovite with admixtures of columbite-(Fe) and the phase FeNbO4; and (b) rossovskyite.
Raman spectroscopy
The Raman spectrum of dmitryvarlamovite (Fig. 4) is better resolved than its IR spectrum. Taking into account force characteristics of cations, the bands at 836, 599 and 509 cm–1 can be assigned to stretching vibrations of the (Ti,Nb)–O–(Ti,Nb), (Ti,Nb)–O–Fe3+ and Fe3+–O–Fe3+ fragments, respectively. The bands below 350 cm–1 are due to O–M–O bending vibrations (M = Ti, Fe3+, Nb etc.). Bands in the range of 380–470 cm–1 are assigned tentatively to a mixed mode involving both stretching and bending internal coordinates. No Raman bands are observed above 900 cm–1 which indicates the absence of H-, B- and C-bearing groups.
Figure 4. Raman spectrum of dmitryvarlamovite.
Mössbauer spectroscopy
The Mössbauer spectra of a mixture of dmitryvarlamovite with columbite-(Fe) and the wolframite-related Fe3+NbO4 mineral are given in Fig. 5. They contain two doublets of Fe3+ and a weak doublet of Fe2+ at 90 K or Fe2.5+ at 295 K related to wolframite-related structures (Table 2). The remaining doublet of Fe2+ is assigned to columbite-(Fe) (Garg et al., Reference Garg, Rodrigues, da Silva E. and Garg1991).
Figure 5. Mössbauer spectra of a mixture of dmitryvarlamovite, a Fe3+NbO4 phase and columbite-(Fe) at (a) room (295 K) temperature and (b) 90 K.
Table 2. Parameters of the Mössbauer spectra of dmitryvarlamovite with admixed columbite-(Fe) and wolframite-related FeNbO4 phase obtained at 90 and 295 K.
The doublet with the isomer shift of 0.625 mm s–1 observed at room temperature is attributed to the mixed valence state of iron (Fe2.5+) by analogy with iron at the octahedrally coordinated site in magnetite and a number of silicates, such as tourmaline (schorl), ilvaite, deerite and some others (Burns, Reference Burns1981; Amthauer and Rossman, Reference Amthauer and Rossman1984). Three doublets assigned to dmitryvarlamovite and the wolframite-related phase FeNbO4 show that the Fe2+ content is 9.6% at 90 K, and 7.5% at 295 K, which generally agrees well with the charge-balance data, according to which Fe2+ constitutes 8% and 8.75% of total iron in dmitryvarlamovite (see below) and the phase FeNbO4, respectively. Ferric iron is distributed equally between positions in the wolframite-related structures.
Optical properties (in reflected light)
In reflected light, dmitryvarlamovite is light grey. Bireflectance is very weak, ΔR = 0.7% (589 nm). No pleochroism is observed. Anisotropy is medium, from light grey to brownish grey. Internal reflections are not observed. Reflectance values of dmitryvarlamovite are given in Table 3.
Table 3. Reflectance values of dmitryvarlamovite.
Note: Reflectance percentages for the four COM (Commission on Ore Mineralogy) wavelengths are given in bold.
Chemical data
The analytical data are given in Table 4. The contents of other elements with atomic numbers higher than that of carbon are below detection limits. H2O and CO2 were not measured because no bands corresponding to CO32– anions and H-bearing groups are observed in the IR and Raman spectra. The crystal structure data confirmed the absence of these components (see below). The charge-balanced empirical formula calculated on 4 cations and 8 O atoms (Z = 1) is (Fe2+0.08V3+0.05Cr3+0.01Fe3+0.92Ti1.79Nb1.15)Σ4.00O8. The crystal-chemical formula derived based on the structural data (see below) is (Ti0.57Nb0.21Fe3+0.15Fe2+0.04V0.02Cr0.01)2(Nb0.36Ti0.33Fe3+0.31)2O8. The ideal, end-member formula, is Ti2(Fe3+Nb)O8.
Table 4. Chemical composition of dmitryvarlamovite.
* Total iron corresponding to Fe2O3 content of 20.94 wt.% is divided into Fe2O3 and FeO based on the charge balance in the empirical formula.
** For total iron calculated as Fe2O3.
S.D. – standard deviation
X-ray diffraction and crystal structure
Powder X-ray diffraction data of dmitryvarlamovite are given in Table 5. The orthorhombic unit-cell parameters refined from the powder data are: a = 4.9961(1), b = 4.6474(3), c = 5.6140(3) Å and V = 130.35(1) Å3. The site occupancies and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters are given in Table 6 and selected atomic distances in Table 7. The crystallographic information file has been deposited with the Principal Editor of Mineralogical Magazine and is available as Supplementary material (see below).
Table 5. Powder X-ray diffraction data for dmitryvarlamovite.
* Values calculated from single-crystal data.
The strongest peaks are given in bold.
Table 6. Sites, fractional atomic coordinates, site occupancies and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters U eq (in Å2) for dmitryvarlamovite.
Table 7. Selected interatomic distances (Å) in the crystal structure of dmitryvarlamovite.
Symmetry codes: (i) 1–x, 1–y, +z; (ii) 3/2–x, 1/2+y, 1–z; (iii) –1/2+x, 1/2–y, 1–z; (iv) 1–x, –y, z; (v) 1/2+x, 1/2–y, 1–z; (vi) 1/2–x, –1/2+y, 1–z; (vii) +x, –1+y, –1+z; (viii) 1–x, 1–y, –1+z
As the mineral is related closely to rossovskyite, which has P2/c symmetry, the choice of the system between orthorhombic and monoclinic ones was important. Initially, we used a monoclinic model with a β angle of 89.953(8)°. Refinement of the crystal structure in the rossovskyite model resulted in R 1 = 0.539, with all atoms showing unrealistic thermal expansion. The best attempt in the monoclinic symmetry was in P21 symmetry. Rossovskyite and dmitryvarlamovite also differ in their PXRD patterns. In the PXRD pattern of rossovskyite, there is a weak peak with d = 4.67 Å which, according to Konovalenko et al. (Reference Konovalenko, Ananyev, Chukanov, Rastsvetaeva, Aksenov, Baeva, Gainov, Vagizov, Lopatin and Nebera2015), corresponds to monoclinic distortion. In the PXRD pattern of dmitryvarlamovite, this peak is absent.
We also tried to use the ixiolite model with Pbcn symmetry, however, the refinement was unstable and resulted in R 1 ≈ 48%. According to the scattering calculations using the PLATON program (Spek, Reference Spek2009), experimental curves are most close to those in the acentric model. The P21212 model was chosen as the most appropriate orthorhombic model consistent with an ordering scheme in the P21 space group. The refined Flack parameter of 0.1(3) is meaningless because the compound shows a weak anomalous scattering.
The crystal structure of dmitryvarlamovite (Fig. 6, 7) is closely related to that of other wolframite-group minerals. It is based upon zigzag-like chains of edge-shared MO6 octahedra. Each chain consists of alternating M1O6 and M2O6 octahedra in contrast to rossovskyite which contains two kinds of chains of octahedra, a chain based on M1O6 octahedra and a chain based on M2O6 octahedra (Konovalenko et al., Reference Konovalenko, Ananyev, Chukanov, Rastsvetaeva, Aksenov, Baeva, Gainov, Vagizov, Lopatin and Nebera2015). All vertices of octahedra are connected with neighbouring chains, thus each oxygen atom is coordinated by three cations. Oxygen atoms form close-packed hexagonal layers perpendicular to the b axis.
Figure 6. The crystal structure of dmitryvarlamovite projected along (a) the a axis and (b) the b axis compared with the crystal structure of rossovskyite projected on (c) the (ab) plane and (d) the (bc) plane to show differences in the arrangement of the M1O6 and M2O6 octahedra. The unit cells are outlined. Drawn using the VESTA 3 program (Momma and Izumi, Reference Momma and Izumi2008).
Figure 7. Bond lengths (Å) in the M1- and M2-centred octahedra of dmitryvarlamovite. Thermal ellipsoids are drawn for a 50% probability level. Drawn using the VESTA 3 program (Momma and Izumi, Reference Momma and Izumi2008).
The refined occupancy of the M1 site (Ti vs. Nb) is Ti0.73(5)Nb0.27(5) with the site-scattering factor of 27.13(13) e‒. The refined mean <M1–O> bond length is 2.009 Å. The refined occupancy of the M2 site (Ti vs. Nb) is Ti0.56(5)Nb0.44(5) with the site-scattering factor of 30.36(15) e– and the refined mean <M2–O> bond length of 2.002 Å. Based on the observed site-scattering factors, bond-valence analysis (Table 8) and chemical composition data, the occupancies are Ti0.57Nb0.21Fe0.19V0.02Cr0.01 for M1 and Nb0.36Ti0.33Fe0.31 for M2, which corresponds to the site-scattering factors of 26.79 and 30.08 e–, respectively. Deviations from the refined site-scattering factors are within the limits corresponding to the chemical heterogeneity.
Table 8. Bond-valence analysis (in valence units, vu) for the crystal structure of dmitryvarlamovite.
* Calculated from the structure data using bond valence parameters from Brese and O'Keeffe (Reference Brese and O'Keeffe1991).
** Expected from the empirical formula.
Discussion
The columbite supergroup (Chukanov et al., Reference Chukanov, Pasero, Aksenov, Britvin, Zubkova, Yike and Witzke2023a) includes five mineral groups (ixiolite, wolframite, samarskite, columbite and wodginite) and one ungrouped species (lithiotantite) with the general stoichiometry MO2 and structures based on zig-zag chains of edge-sharing M-centred polyhedra. All these minerals have the same topology of their atomic nets with different schemes of cation ordering and, consequently, different unit-cell dimensions. The orthorhombic ixiolite-type structure with disordered M cations is considered as an aristotype of the supergroup with the basic vectors a0, b0, c0.
The structures of wolframite-group minerals and the new mineral species, dmitryvarlamovite, described in this work, are characterised by the same basic vectors, a0, b0 and c0, but differ in the schemes of cation ordering. The cation ordering among octahedral sites in dmitryvarlamovite corresponds to a new ordering scheme which was not observed previously in the columbite supergroup. Comparative data for dmitryvarlamovite and related minerals are given in Table 9.
Table 9. Comparative data for dmitryvarlamovite and related wolframite-group minerals.
According to the columbite-supergroup nomenclature (Chukanov et al., Reference Chukanov, Pasero, Aksenov, Britvin, Zubkova, Yike and Witzke2023a), topologically identical minerals with different schemes of cation ordering, including those with similar unit-cell dimensions and identical end-member formulae, are considered as different mineral species. For example, srilankite (Pbcn, a = 4.71, b = 5.55 and c = 5.02 Å) and riesite (P2/b, a = 4.52, b = 5.50, c = 4.89 Å and β = 90.6°), both TiO2, are considered as different mineral species. Nioboixiolite-(Mn2+) (Nb2/3Mn2+1/3)O2 [= Mn2+Nb2O6] (Pbcn, a = 4.756, b = 5.732 and c = 5.134 Å) and columbite-(Mn), Mn2+Nb2O6 (Pbcn, a = 14.32, b = 5.74 and c = 5.11 Å) are also different mineral species belonging to different mineral groups. Thus, the mineral with the end-member formula Fe3+NbO4 occurring in association with dmitryvarlamovite may be either rossovskyite or a potentially new mineral species dimorphous with rossovskyite and isostructural with dmitryvarlamovite.
Acknowledgements
The chemical and IR spectroscopic data were obtained in accordance with the state task of the Russian Federation, registration number FFSG-2024-0009. The crystal structure investigation was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 21-77-10103. The authors thank V.V. Likhachev for kindly donating samples. The authors also thank B.A. Makeeva and A.S. Shuisky, the employees of the Institute of Geology, FRC Komi Scientific Center for preliminary PXRD data and electron microprobe analyses.
Supplementary material
The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1180/mgm.2023.95
Competing interests
The authors declare none.
