Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T09:57:30.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural Equation Models: From Paths to Networks (Westland 2019)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Marko Sarstedt*
Affiliation:
Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg Monash University Malaysia
Christian M. Ringle
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology University of Waikato
*
Correspondence should be made to Marko Sarstedt, School of Business and GA21, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Book Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s)

Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a statistical analytic framework that allows researchers to specify and test models with observed and latent (or unobservable) variables and their generally linear relationships. In the past decades, SEM has become a standard statistical analysis technique in behavioral, educational, psychological, and social science researchers’ repertoire.

From a technical perspective, SEM was developed as a mixture of two statistical fields—path analysis and data reduction. Path analysis is used to specify and examine directional relationships between observed variables, whereas data reduction is applied to uncover (unobserved) low-dimensional representations of observed variables, which are referred to as latent variables. Since two different data reduction techniques (i.e., factor analysis and principal component analysis) were available to the statistical community, SEM also evolved into two domains—factor-based and component-based (e.g., Jöreskog and Wold Reference Jöreskog, Wold, Wold and Jöreskog1982). In factor-based SEM, in which the psychometric or psychological measurement tradition has strongly influenced, a (common) factor represents a latent variable under the assumption that each latent variable exists as an entity independent of observed variables, but also serves as the sole source of the associations between the observed variables. Conversely, in component-based SEM, which is more in line with traditional multivariate statistics, a weighted composite or a component of observed variables represents a latent variable under the assumption that the latter is an aggregation (or a direct consequence) of observed variables.

About the Book

Westland’s (Reference Westland2019) Structural Equation Models: From Paths to Networks offers a concise, well-written, and non-technical reference for SEM. The textbook comprises 149 pages structured into eight chapters. The chapters are largely independent of one another, allowing them to be easily covered in a different order. The content of Westland’s (Reference Westland2019) textbook makes it very attractive as additional reading for methodological courses devoted to factor-based SEM and wanting to delve into the method’s historic roots. Readers will also appreciate the various overview tables offering excellent summaries of selected contents, as well as the book’s index, which allows them to quickly identify topics and key terms of interest.

Whereas most textbooks focus on either factor-based or component-based SEM (e.g., Hair et al. Reference Hair, Hult, Ringle and Sarstedt2017; Kline Reference Kline2016), Westland’s (Reference Westland2019) book is unique in that it showcases the full range of SEM methodologies, starting with Wright’s (Reference Wright1921) path analysis, followed by partial least squares (PLS) path modeling (e.g., the difference between it and PLS regression is explicitly addressed), full-information covariance-based SEM, and recent neural network-based approaches. By placing these methods in a historical context, the book provides insights into their similarities and differences (e.g., the Chicago School and the Scandinavian School), which certainly explain why some disciplines have clustered around one or the other SEM method.

This book has many other valuable aspects. Most notably, Westland (Reference Westland2019) strongly emphasizes research design issues, which often receive scant attention in textbooks. These issues have a fundamental bearing on the implications drawn from any SEM analysis (Rigdon et al. Reference Rigdon, Sarstedt and Becker2020). For example, Chapters 4 and 5 offer a detailed account of data adequacy in SEM, drawing specific attention to Likert scale data. Applied researchers will particularly benefit from the various guidelines for data collection and preparation, which go beyond the standard power analyses covered in popular textbooks. For example, Westland (Reference Westland2019, p. 101) derives a metric for computing sample sizes required to offset information loss through the use of Likert scales rather than continuous metrics. The explications in Chapter 7 on research protocols are particularly noteworthy. Common topics, such as the nature of models, theory building, and hypothesis testing, are presented concisely to offer scope for subjects one would not expect in a compact reference guide. For example, Westland (Reference Westland2019) issues cautionary warnings about behavioral biases, such as apriorisms, that impact causal inference. Given increasing concerns about reproducibility (Nuzzo Reference Nuzzo2015), users of SEM should take these warnings seriously, as causal inferential conclusions are only supported under specific conditions (Bollen and Pearl Reference Bollen, Pearl and Morgan2013).

Future Improvements

Similar to any other textbook, there are also elements that we believe could be improved. While the structure is very clear, the chapters’ content distribution is sometimes uneven. For example, the author devotes an entire 22-page chapter (Chapter 2) and various sections (e.g., Chapter 4.4) throughout the 149-page book to PLS path modeling, only to conclude that “it is an ideal tool for unscrupulous or lazy researchers interested in bogus theories with random data” (Westland Reference Westland2019, p. 38).

Apart from this structural concern, Westland’s (Reference Westland2019) conclusion underlines the general sentiment that component-based SEM and factor-based SEM are competing approaches. However, as suggested in other parts of the book, researchers’ functional background and adherence to a specific philosophy of science position contribute to the confusion over which method is “right” and which is “wrong” (Rigdon et al. Reference Rigdon, Sarstedt and Ringle2017). These aspects have been extensively discussed in various social science fields (Henseler et al. Reference Henseler, Dijkstra, Sarstedt, Ringle, Diamantopoulos and Straub2014), including psychology (Rhemtulla et al. Reference Rhemtulla, van Bork and Borsboom2020; Rigdon et al. Reference Rigdon, Becker and Sarstedt2019). We believe a new edition would benefit from a more balanced description of the different viewpoints, given that recent advances in component-based SEM address the various concerns expressed in the book. For example, generalized structure component analysis offers a single optimization criterion as well as model fit metrics and allows researchers to impose model constraints (Hwang and Takane Reference Hwang and Takane2014). In addition, research has suggested extensions of component-based SEM methods that reliably estimate both factor- and component-model parameters (e.g., Dijkstra and Henseler Reference Dijkstra and Henseler2015; Hwang et al. Reference Hwang, Cho, Jung, Falk, Flake and Jin2020).

Moreover, extensions of some of the simulations documented in the book would also be beneficial. For example, in Chapter 2, the author uses a simulation study to demonstrate the PLS path modeling method’s limitations. The simulation study assumes zero relationships between all the components, which is problematic, since the PLS path modeling algorithm—as also described in this textbook—requires a nomological net (i.e., at least some relationships that are not zero) to run adequately. The author’s general conclusion that “PLS path estimates are biased and highly dispersed from small samples” (Westland Reference Westland2019, p. 36) should therefore only be considered in the context of this very specific model setup—see also Henseler et al. (Reference Henseler, Dijkstra, Sarstedt, Ringle, Diamantopoulos and Straub2014).

Conclusion

There is no doubt that a broad range of readers from varying disciplines will benefit from this book. By discussing often neglected topics in SEM, Westland (Reference Westland2019) offers the reverse of the various cookbook-type textbooks prevalent in so many social sciences fields. In light of this positioning, applied researchers with no or little knowledge of the topic need to be aware that they require an additional resource that offers practical guidance on how to apply SEM with programs such as LISREL or Mplus, and how to counter problems commonly encountered in SEM analyses. Despite the aspects that need improvement, Structural Equation Models: From Paths to Networks is a valuable resource for novice users who want to work with SEM. It also offers new perspectives for routine SEM users who wish to use this textbook to gain an overview of SEM’s underlying research philosophy, the broad portfolio of methods, their historical origins and interrelationships, recent developments, and other important topics such as data quality. Readers wanting to participate in the factor- vs. component-based methods debate should, however, look beyond the book and consider recent discussions on this topic (Petter Reference Petter2018). Priced at about 170 USD for the hardcover version, the book is certainly in the upper price range, but most academic institutions will probably have access to the e-book version via SpringerLink.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

Bollen, K. A., & Pearl, J. Morgan, S. L. Eight myths about causality and structural equation models. Handbook of causal analysis for social research, (2013). Cham: Springer. 301328. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39, 297316. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hair, J. F., Hult, T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., et al. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about partial least squares: Comments on Rönkkö & Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17, 182209. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, H., Cho, G., Jung, K., Falk, C. F., Flake, J. K., Jin, M. J., et al. (2020). An approach to structural equation modeling with both factors and components: Integrated generalized structured component analysis. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, H., & Takane, Y. (2014). Generalized structured component analysis: A component-based approach to structural equation modeling, New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., & Wold, H. Wold, H., & Jöreskog, K. G. (1982). The ML and PLS techniques for modeling with latent variables: Historical and comparative aspects. Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction, part I, Amsterdam: North-Holland. 263270. Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4. New York, NY: Guilford Publications. Google Scholar
Nuzzo, R. (2015). How scientists fool themselves: And how they can stop. Nature, 526 182185. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petter, S. (2018). “Haters gonna hate”: PLS and information systems research. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 49, 1013. Google Scholar
Rhemtulla, M., van Bork, R., & Borsboom, D. (2020). Worse than measurement error: Consequences of inappropriate latent variable measurement models. Psychological Methods, 25, 3045. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigdon, E. E., Becker, J. -M, & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Factor indeterminacy as metrological uncertainty: Implications for advancing psychological measurement. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 54, 429443. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigdon, E. E., Sarstedt, M., & Becker, J. -M (2020). Quantify uncertainty in behavioral research. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 329331. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigdon, E. E., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2017). On comparing results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Five perspectives and five recommendations. Marketing ZFP, 39, 416. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westland, J. C. (2019). Structural equation models: From paths to networks, 2. Cham: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research, 20, 557585. Google Scholar