Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T10:20:30.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevalence and persistence of Neisseria meningitidis carriage in Swedish university students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2023

Säll Olof*
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Eriksson Lorraine
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Idosa Berhane A.
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Inflammatory Response and Infection Susceptibility Centre (iRiSC), School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Persson Alexander
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Inflammatory Response and Infection Susceptibility Centre (iRiSC), School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Magnuson Anders
Affiliation:
Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Thulin Hedberg Sara
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Sundqvist Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Olcén Per
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Fredlund Hans
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Stenmark Bianca
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Särndahl Eva
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Inflammatory Response and Infection Susceptibility Centre (iRiSC), School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Mölling Paula
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Jacobsson Susanne
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
*
Author for correspondence: Säll Olof, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The bacterium Neisseria meningitidis causes life-threatening disease worldwide, typically with a clinical presentation of sepsis or meningitis, but can be carried asymptomatically as part of the normal human oropharyngeal microbiota. The aim of this study was to examine N. meningitidis carriage with regard to prevalence, risk factors for carriage, distribution of meningococcal lineages and persistence of meningococcal carriage. Throat samples and data from a self-reported questionnaire were obtained from 2744 university students (median age: 23 years) at a university in Sweden on four occasions during a 12-month period. Meningococcal isolates were characterised using whole-genome sequencing. The carriage rate among the students was 9.1% (319/3488; 95% CI 8.2–10.1). Factors associated with higher carriage rate were age ≤22 years, previous tonsillectomy, cigarette smoking, drinking alcohol and attending parties, pubs and clubs. Female gender and sharing a household with children aged 0–9 years were associated with lower carriage. The most frequent genogroups were capsule null locus (cnl), group B and group Y and the most commonly identified clonal complexes (cc) were cc198 and cc23. Persistent carriage with the same meningococcal strain for 12 months was observed in two students. Follow-up times exceeding 12 months are recommended for future studies investigating long-term carriage of N. meningitidis.

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

The Gram-negative bacterium Neisseria meningitidis (also known as meningococcus) causes significant morbidity and mortality worldwide with disease classically presenting as rapidly progressing septicaemia and/or meningitis. Classification of N. meningitidis is based on the composition of its capsular polysaccharides. Twelve different capsular groups have been defined, with six of them (A, B, C, Y, W and X) predominating among cases of invasive disease [Reference Harrison1]. Meningococcal isolates can be further characterised into clonal complexes (cc) using multilocus sequencing typing (MLST) [Reference Maiden2], and genetically divided by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) [Reference Read3]. Certain meningococcal lineages are more prone to cause disease rather than carriage, for example the hyperinvasive lineages belonging to cc11, cc32 and cc269 [Reference Read3]. Carriage isolates may lack capsule which is a major virulence factor for N. meningitidis [Reference Dolan-Livengood4].

Humans are the only known reservoir of N. meningitidis. It is part of the normal oropharyngeal microbiota in healthy humans, and can be carried without symptoms or harm [Reference Coureuil5]. Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is rare compared to carriage, and is more common in newly colonised individuals [Reference Edwards6]. IMD usually occurs sporadically, but the meningococcus is also associated with outbreaks [Reference Rosenstein7]. The relationship between carriage and development of invasive disease is not fully understood, although several factors associated with carriage of N. meningitidis have been identified; including age, male sex, exposure to cigarette smoke, recent respiratory tract infections and closeness of social contacts [Reference Stuart8Reference Cartwright, Stuart and Robinson13].

Carriage rates of N. meningitidis vary with setting and age, and in recent years, a trend towards lower carriage rates among teenagers has been observed [Reference McMillan14, Reference Watle15]. The highest carriage rates are usually found among teenagers and young adults, with a peak incidence at 19 years of age according to a systematic review by Christensen et al. [Reference Christensen16]. Several outbreaks of IMD have been reported from settings where teenagers and young adults gather, for example at youth camps, universities and military service [Reference van Kessel17, Reference Smith-Palmer18]. Increasing carriage prevalence have been reported among students the first weeks after admission to university [Reference Oldfield19, Reference Ala'aldeen20], indicating that socialising patterns are important for the dynamics of meningococcal carriage. Previous studies with repeated sampling have shown carriage of the same meningococcal strain for up to 8 months, but the upper limit of long-term carriage is still unknown [Reference Mustapha21, Reference van Ravenhorst22].

In Sweden since 2016, N. meningitidis group W (MenW) and group Y (MenY) have emerged as the most common causes of IMD in the country. It is unclear whether this change in group distribution is caused by certain bacterial virulence factors or is an effect of high carriage of these groups within the population.

The aims of this study were to examine N. meningitidis carriage among students at a university in Sweden with regard to carriage prevalence, risk factors for carriage, characteristics of carriage isolates and persistence of meningococcal carriage up to 12 months.

Materials and methods

Inclusion of participants

Study participants were recruited at Örebro University, Sweden, on four occasions, September 2018, January 2019, May 2019 and September 2019. The sample collection took place at two campuses of the university, the medical campus and the general campus, located at a distance of three km from each other.

All students at the university were eligible for inclusion and the students could participate on one or more of the sampling occasions. The students were informed about the study in advance via posters, social media and the university's home page. They were also approached about participation by the researchers in major hallways of the university buildings, and provided with written and oral information about the study. At inclusion, each participant generated a unique digital study code, enabling repeated data input from the same individual without storage of civic number or other personal data.

The participating students completed an electronic questionnaire, connected with their personal study code, to assess risk factors for meningococcal carriage, including age, household conditions, current or recent upper respiratory tract infection, recent use of antibiotics, smoking habits, frequency of alcohol drinking, frequency of attending parties, pubs or night clubs and prior meningococcal vaccination.

The questionnaire also contained questions about number of persons kissed in the last week, and whether the participant had shared a glass or bottle, as well as use of a water pipe or cannabis, which are both usually shared between people. In addition, the participants reported their use of Swedish snus (moist powder tobacco in powder form or packaged in tea bag-like portion sachets made of cellulose fibres, placed inside the upper lip).

Ethical considerations

Prior to inclusion, the study participants digitally signed a written informed consent form which was provided electronically through the study website in such a way that it was not possible to generate the digital study code without giving informed consent. The study code was based on hash values unique to each individual but without any personal data, making participation in the study anonymous. This meant that the researchers did not have access to actively contact the students, leaving participation and re-participation fully in the hands of the volunteering students. The participants were offered coffee/tea with cookies and chocolates or sweets in acknowledgement of their participation. The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Uppsala, Sweden (reference number 2017/499).

Sample collection and microbiological methods

Throat swabs from the oropharyngeal area and from one tonsil were performed by experienced health care professionals using flocked plastic swabs (ESwab, Copan Diagnostics, Murrieta, CA, USA). Samples were placed in the ESwab tubes containing Amies transport media (Copan Diagnostics), and transported within 8 h to the national reference laboratory for N. meningitidis at Örebro University Hospital, where a duplex PCR targeting ctrA and crgA [Reference Hedberg23] was performed within 24 h. If found to be positive for both or either of ctrA or crgA, samples were subsequently cultured on selective and non-selective agar plates (GC agar with added vancomycin, colistin, nystatin and trimethoprim; and plain GC agar, respectively) incubated for 24 h in a humid CO2-enriched (5%) atmosphere at 36 ± 1 °C. If no visible growth was noticed after 24 h, the plates were incubated for an additional 24 h. N. meningitidis was confirmed by colony appearance, oxidase positivity and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany) and then subcultured and preserved.

The ctrA/crgA PCR used in this study was originally developed to detect invasive meningococcal isolates from fluids normally considered sterile. As a confirmatory analysis of the ctrA/crgA PCR, all collected samples were additionally analysed with a second PCR targeting sodC and porA, adapted from a previous carriage study [Reference Diallo24]. Samples were considered as true positive if the culture showed growth of N. meningitidis, or showed positivity in both the ctrA/crgA and sodC/porA duplex PCRs (but not necessarily for all four PCR targets).

Except for the first sample occasion, an additional throat swab was performed that was placed in a DNA/RNA Shield Collection Tube (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) and stored for future RNA analyses.

Molecular characterisation of meningococcal isolates

All culture-positive isolates were further characterised using WGS on the Illumina platform to define genogroup, MLST lineages and genetic similarities, as previously described [Reference Eriksson25]. However, from each culture-positive sample only one colony was characterised.

A phylogenetic tree of carriage isolates was created with BIGSdb integrated in the Neisseria PubMLST database [Reference Jolley and Maiden26] using the genome comparator tool (based on 1605 N. meningitidis core loci) and visualised with the online tool iTOL [Reference Letunic and Bork27].

N. meningitidis detected by PCR alone, and where culture isolate was lacking, were genogrouped using multiplex real-time PCR for the groups A, B, C, W, Y and X according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer (Rotor-Gene Q, Venlo, The Netherlands).

Statistical analyses

This was a descriptive study of N. meningitidis carriage, with cross-sectional data obtained at the four sampling occasions and with longitudinal data for students participating more than once. Logistic regression was used to adjust for possible confounders in the analysis of associations for risk factors and carriage. The effect of individuals participating more than once was balanced by using logistic regression with generalised estimating equations and with unstructured correlation structure between sampling occasions. Both unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed to evaluate the variables' independent associations with carriage. All risk factors for carriage were analysed as categorical variables; however, age was analysed both as a continuous variable using odds ratio (OR) per year and in three categories (≤22, 23–29, ≥30 years). In addition, the frequencies of a number of habits (cigarette smoking, use of Swedish snus, alcohol drinking and attending parties, pubs or clubs) were analysed as linear trend (OR per category) in relation to carriage. The statistical calculations were performed using version 17 of STATA (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA). Two-sided P values of <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Participants' characteristics

A total of 2744 university students participated with both throat swabs and completed questionnaires, and hence were eligible for the risk factor analysis. Of these, 2251 (82.0%) participated once, 309 (11.3%) twice, 146 (5.3%) three times and 38 (1.4%) at all four occasions (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Distribution of students (n = 2744) participating in different combinations of the four sample occasions. Right-hand side: numbers of students participating once (n = 2251), twice (n = 309), three times (n = 146), and four times (n = 38).

In total, 3459 throat samples with accompanying questionnaires were collected. During the first sampling round in September 2018, 1347 students participated, followed by 848, 489 and 775, respectively, at subsequent occasions. A diverse pattern of participation was seen for the students who participated repeatedly (Fig. 1).

The characteristics of the participants are described in Table 1. The median age was 23 years (IQR: 21–27 years, range: 16–59 years) and 63.3% were female. Of the 3459 samples, 895 (25.9%) were obtained from students who lived alone, 2350 (67.9%) from students who lived with another adult, 422 (12.2%) from students who lived with children aged 0–9 years and 362 (10.5%) from students who lived with one or more children aged 10–19. A total of 203 students (5.8%) lived in a student corridor or other shared accommodation with more than two adults.

Table 1. Characteristics of participating students assessed for carriage of N. meningitidis, presented data that applied during sampling of the 3459 samples

a In the past month.

b In the past week.

Smoking was recorded in 249 (7.2%) of the participating students and 472 (13.6%) used Swedish snus. A total of 82 (2.4%) participants reported having previously received any type of meningococcal vaccine.

Carriage rate and risk factors for carriage

In addition to the 3459 samples with accompanying questionnaires, another 29 samples were collected but without a completed questionnaire. All 3488 samples were initially analysed using the ctrA/crgA PCR, of which 601 samples were positive and further cultured. In 241 samples, N. meningitidis was isolated. In another 78 samples, presence of N. meningitidis DNA was verified using the sodC/porA PCR, leading to a total carriage prevalence of 9.1% (95% CI 8.2–10.1, 319/3488; Figure 2). The group of students participating more than once (n = 493) provided 1208 samples, of which 8.4% (95% CI 7.0–10.1, 102/1208) were positive for N. meningitidis. Among students who participated only once (n = 2251), the carriage rate was 9.4% (95% CI 8.3–10.7, 212/2251). No statistical difference in carriage prevalence was seen between sampling occasions (Table 2). Culture was performed on a number of randomly selected ctrA/crgA negative samples (n = 291); all of these were culture-negative.

Fig. 2. Flow chart of throat samples in the analysis of carriage of N. meningitidis. In 10 samples, culture was missed due to human error.

Table 2. Unadjusted and adjusted analysis of risk factors for carriage of N. meningitidis for samples with accompanying questionnaire (carriers of N. meningitidis: 314/3459, 9.1%; 95% CI 8.2–10.1)

In the adjusted analysis, all variables were included in the model. Logistic regression as generalised estimating equations with panel samples, outcome meningococcal carriage, 2744 subjects. Significant results (P < 0.05) highlighted in bold and italic.

a Participants without specified gender (n = 6) not included in the adjusted analysis.

b In the past month.

c In the past week.

Among the 3459 samples with accompanying questionnaires that were eligible for risk factor analysis, the carriage rate was 9.1% (95% CI 8.1–10.0, 314/3459). In the unadjusted analysis, the following risk factors were significantly associated with higher carriage for N. meningitidis: previous tonsillectomy, travelling abroad in the past month, daily use of cigarettes or Swedish snus, drinking alcohol in the past week, sharing a glass/bottle in the past week and attending a party, pub or club in the past week. Female gender, age >22 years, living with another adult and living with children aged 0–9 years were associated with a lower risk of meningococcal carriage (Table 2).

In the adjusted analysis that included all variables, the following factors were significantly associated with higher carriage rates of N. meningitidis: previous tonsillectomy, daily cigarette smoking, drinking alcohol in the past week and attending a party, pub or club in the past week. Female gender, age >22 years and living with children aged 0–9 years were associated with lower risk. The analysis of age as a continuous variable revealed an odds reduction for meningococcal carriage of 8% per year of increasing age. A dose dependency was found between the daily number of cigarettes smoked and the risk of meningococcal carriage (OR per category: 1.39, 95% CI 1.00–1.93). In addition, a dose dependency was noted for the frequency of attendance at a party, pub or club during the week before sampling (OR per category: 1.41, 95% CI 1.16–1.72). The use of Swedish snus was not significantly associated with meningococcal carriage in the adjusted analysis (Table 2).

Characterisation of carriage isolates

Of the 319 samples containing N. meningitidis, 241 culture isolates were further analysed for genogroup belonging using WGS, and 78 samples identified only with PCR were analysed using the multiplexed genogrouping PCR. The groups identified among the 241 culture isolates were capsule null locus (cnl) (n = 88), group B (n = 66), group Y (n = 44), group E (n = 15), group C (n = 8), group Z (n = 3), group A (n = 1), group W (n = 1) and group X (n = 1), whereas 14 isolates were non-groupable. The groups identified among the 78 only PCR positive samples were group B (n = 15), group Y (n = 10), group C (n = 2). In 51 of the samples analysed with the multiplex genogrouping PCR, none of the groups A, B, C, W, Y or X could be detected, and further characterisation of these samples in terms of, for example, cnl or non-groupable (NG) affiliation was not possible due to the low amount of DNA in some samples. The most common cc of the 241 samples analysed with WGS were ST-198 (n = 48), ST-23 (n = 42, of which 24 belonged to sequence type 23), ST-32 (n = 28, of which 13 belonged to sequence type 7460) and ST-1156 (n = 24) (Fig. 3). There were no significant differences in the distribution of genogroups or cc between the different sampling occasions.

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationships of N. meningitidis carriage isolates (n = 241) presented as a circular phylogram with the corresponding clonal complexes in the outermost circle, and the corresponding groups in the second outermost circle. Cnl = capsule null locus, NG/ND = non-groupable / no data. The scale of the tree indicates 1% genes with allele differences out of the analysed 1422 genes.

Long-term carriage

Table 3 presents data on the 32 students who were positive for N. meningitidis on more than one sampling occasion. In 20 of these students, the same meningococcal strain was found, while different strains over time were found in 10 students. In 6 students who were carriers more than once, the genogrouping analysis could not distinguish between shift or persistence of the meningococcal strain. Over the whole study period of 12 months, two individuals were persistent carriers of an identical strain verified by WGS (student numbers 1 and 11 in Table 3). One additional individual (student number 2 in Table 3) was a carrier of MenY for 12 months, but it was not possible to analyse one of the samples with WGS for exact strain determination.

Table 3. Study participants with more than one sample positive for carriage of N. meningitidis

ST, sequence type; cc, clonal complex

n.a. = the student did not participate in the study period respectively.

Light green colour: persistence of same lineage confirmed by WGS.

Dark green colour: probably persistence of same lineage, the genogrouping methods used could not confirm if it was the same lineage at the different sampling times.

Blue colour: replacement of lineage or probably replacement of lineage.

Discussion

The overall carriage rate for N. meningitidis was 9.1% among university students in Sweden with a median age of 23 years. Higher rates of meningococcal carriage were associated with previous tonsillectomy, daily cigarette smoking, drinking alcohol in the past week and attending parties, clubs and pubs in the past week, while lower carriage rate were associated with age ≥22 years, female gender and sharing a household with children aged 0–9 years. The most common cc were ST-198 and ST-23.

A number of previously known risk factors for meningococcal carriage were identified in this study, including smoking [Reference Drew28Reference Marshall30], with which the present study also confirmed a dose-dependent association. Both alcohol drinking and attending parties, pubs or clubs were associated with higher carriage rates, as seen in other studies [Reference MacLennan9, Reference Marshall30]. However, alcohol drinking and party attendance often occur simultaneously, making the causal relationship with carriage hard to assess. Previous tonsillectomy has been associated with higher carriage rates of N. meningitidis in other studies [Reference Tefera31, Reference Jha and Ghosh32], and this association was also seen in the present study. We studied one possible risk factor for meningococcal carriage that has been only sparsely studied before: the use of Swedish snus. A Norwegian study described an association between use of Swedish snus and meningococcal carriage [Reference Watle15], but we found no such association for the whole cohort in the adjusted analysis.

In this study, the participants were relatively old compared to carriage studies of university students in other countries. The older median age of the students might reflect social behaviours and hence, risk factors for meningococcal carriage.

This is the first meningococcal carriage study of this size to be performed in Sweden. In 1979, Kamme and Kahlmeter reported a carriage rate of 8% (27/332) among students at a Swedish university [Reference Kamme and Kahlmeter33], but did not present any further characterisation of the isolates, and so it is not possible to evaluate how carriage of certain lineages or strains has developed over time in Sweden. Meningococcal carriage rates have decreased over recent decades in Norway [Reference Watle15] and in the UK [Reference MacLennan10]. One hypothesised explanation for this decrease is that change over time in social behaviours among teenagers and young adults has led to a trend of fewer social contacts, and hence fewer transmission opportunities for N. meningitidis [Reference MacLennan10].

In Sweden during the years when this study was conducted (2018–2019), the incidence of IMD was 0.6 cases per 100 000 inhabitants per year, and the most commonly identified groups among invasive isolates were MenW (36%, of which 37/44 belonged to the cc11 2013 strain), MenY (29%, of which 34/35 belonged to cc23) and MenB (13%) [34]. In this study, only one carriage isolate was grouped as MenW, belonging to the MenW cc11 2013 strain. The high incidence of MenW cc11 2013 strain invasive infections in Sweden may be due to high bacterial virulence, as studies on transgenic mice have shown that isolates of this particular strain caused higher levels of bacteraemia and induced more proinflammatory activity compared to MenY cc23 isolates [Reference Eriksson35]. Meningococcal carriage may induce bactericidal antibodies that are mainly strain-specific and would therefore not induce a general humoral defence against diverse meningococcal strains [Reference Jones36]. The low levels of MenW cc11 2013 strain carriage in this study may be associated with reduced strain-specific humoral immunity against this strain in the Swedish population, meaning that exposure to the MenW cc11 2013 strain is more likely to result in IMD rather than asymptomatic carriage. Similar findings have been reported from Chile, where Rubilar et al. noted a low carriage rate of group W ST-11 among adolescents in a year when the same clonal complex accounted for 66% of the total IMD cases in Chile that year [Reference Rubilar37]. In contrast, MenY cc23 was the second most common clonal complex among the carriage isolates in this study, and one of the most frequent causes of IMD during the study period. If representative of the Swedish population as a whole, the high carriage of MenY cc23 could be one possible explanation for the high frequency of MenY cc23 among invasive isolates during the same period in Sweden.

To our knowledge, this is the first report of carriage of the same meningococcal strain for 12 months or more as verified by WGS, which was found in two participants. Previous studies have shown meningococcal carriage of the same strain verified by WGS for up to 8 months [Reference Mustapha21, Reference van Ravenhorst22]. Other studies reported repeated meningococcal carriage for 14 months [Reference De Wals38] and 18 months [Reference Basta39], respectively, but these reports lacked information on whether the same strain was preserved or whether there had been a strain replacement. Studies of meningococcal carriage over a longer period, using WGS or equivalent methods, are needed to assess how long carriage of the same meningococcal strain can last. Also, the role of persistent carriage should be studied further. Prolonged carriage of hypervirulent strains may put more people at risk for severe infections; however, long-time carriage of non-encapsulated meningococci may act protective for invasive disease for the individual.

One strength of this study was that the questionnaires were filled in electronically, yielding a high completion rate, though all data in the questionnaire were self-reported and not checked objectively. Another strength was the use of an individual study number that enabled repeated testing without saving any personal information, which facilitated privacy for the study participants. However, this approach prevented active follow up for repeated testing, which might have limited the study of long-term carriage as only a low number of students participated all four times. The choice of methods comprised a strength, with PCR for the identification of N. meningitidis in all samples yielding high sensitivity and specificity [Reference Diallo24, Reference Rizek40Reference Greenwood42], followed by culture of PCR-positive samples for further characterisation of isolates using WGS. One possible limitation was that only one colony from each culture-positive sample was further characterised with WGS or other molecular methods, and so we did not study the carriage of multiple meningococcal lineages or strains within the same individual. Another limitation was that the samples where N. meningitidis was detected by PCR only, and not cultured, were only further characterised using genogrouping PCR. For these samples, it was therefore not possible to determine if the study participant carried the same meningococcal strain at the different sampling times.

This study of meningococcal carriage was performed prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, and hence before any restrictions were imposed on social interactions. During the pandemic, the reported IMD cases dropped in many countries including Sweden [Reference Brueggemann43]. It would be of great interest to study whether meningococcal carriage has changed during the pandemic and after communities have returned to previous social behaviours, regarding both the carriage rate per se and the distribution of pathogenic and non-pathogenic lineages.

Conclusion

In this study, carriage of N. meningitidis was 9.1% and previously known risk factors for meningococcal carriage could be confirmed. About half of the identified N. meningitidis belonged to cc that are not associated with invasive disease.

With repeated testing and by using WGS, we found carriage of the same meningococcal strain over a period of 1 year, indicating long-term carriage. Further studies with longer follow-up times and smaller swabbing intervals are needed to better understand the dynamics of meningococcal carriage.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the participants for their contribution. We also gratefully acknowledge Patrik Lindblom, M.Sc. Engineering and Software engineer, for the design, development and implementation of the method and software tool used for generating personal yet anonymous study codes. We thank all the staff at the Department of Laboratory Medicine and for valuable assistance in the sampling, especially: Örjan Garpenholt, Torbjörn Norén, Gunnar Hagström, Cathrine Binett Österlund, Ann-Sofi Mattsson and Annethe Thegel. Finally, we thank the maintenance services at Örebro University for preparing facilities appropriately equipped for the sampling sessions.

Financial support

The study was financed by grants from the Swedish state under the ALF agreement between the Swedish government and Region Örebro County (grant numbers OLL-934674, OLL-785001), by grants from the Research Committee of Region Örebro County (grant numbers OLL-810491, OLL-812521) and from Nyckelfonden Örebro (grant number OLL-887251).

Conflict of interest

None.

Data availability statement

The data underlying this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Harrison, OB et al. (2013) Description and nomenclature of Neisseria meningitidis capsule locus. Emerging Infectious Diseases 19, 566573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maiden, MC et al. (1998) Multilocus sequence typing: a portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95, 31403145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, RC (2014) Neisseria meningitidis; clones, carriage, and disease. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 20, 391395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dolan-Livengood, JM et al. (2003) Genetic basis for nongroupable Neisseria meningitidis. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 187, 16161628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coureuil, M et al. (2019) Molecular interactions between Neisseria meningitidis and its human host. Cellular Microbiology 21, e13063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, EA et al. (1977) Immunological investigations of meningococcal disease. III. Brevity of group C acquisition prior to disease occurrence. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 9, 105110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstein, NE et al. (2001) Meningococcal disease. The New England Journal of Medicine 344, 13781388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuart, JM et al. (1989) Does eradication of meningococcal carriage in household contacts prevent secondary cases of meningococcal disease? BMJ 298, 569570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLennan, J et al. (2006) Social behavior and meningococcal carriage in British teenagers. Emerging Infectious Diseases 12, 950957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLennan, JM et al. (2021) Meningococcal carriage in periods of high and low invasive meningococcal disease incidence in the UK: comparison of UKMenCar1-4 cross-sectional survey results. Lancet Infectious Diseases 21, 677687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueller, JE et al. (2008) Association of respiratory tract infection symptoms and air humidity with meningococcal carriage in Burkina Faso. Tropical Medicine & International Health 13, 15431552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, ME et al. (2018) Meningococcal carriage in high-risk settings: a systematic review. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 73, 109117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cartwright, KA, Stuart, JM and Robinson, PM (1991) Meningococcal carriage in close contacts of cases. Epidemiology & Infection 106, 133141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMillan, M et al. (2019) B Part of it study: a longitudinal study to assess carriage of Neisseria meningitidis in first year university students in South Australia. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 15, 987994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watle, SV et al. (2020) Meningococcal carriage in Norwegian teenagers: strain characterisation and assessment of risk factors. Epidemiology & Infection 148, e80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, H et al. (2010) Meningococcal carriage by age: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 10, 853861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Kessel, F et al. (2019) Outbreaks of meningococcal meningitis in non-African countries over the last 50 years: a systematic review. Journal of Global Health 9, 010411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith-Palmer, A et al. (2016) Outbreak of Neisseria meningitidis capsular group W among scouts returning from the World Scout Jamboree, Japan, 2015. Eurosurveillance 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, NJ et al. (2017) Rise in group W Meningococcal carriage in university students, United Kingdom. Emerging Infectious Diseases 23, 10091011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ala'aldeen, DA et al. (2011) Carriage of meningococci by university students, United Kingdom. Emerging Infectious Diseases 17, 17621763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mustapha, MM et al. (2021) Transmission dynamics and microevolution of Neisseria meningitidis during carriage and invasive disease in high school students, Georgia and Maryland, USA, 2006–2007. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 223, 20382047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Ravenhorst, MB et al. (2017) Meningococcal carriage in Dutch adolescents and young adults; a cross-sectional and longitudinal cohort study. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 23, 573.e1-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedberg, ST et al. (2009) Real-time PCR detection of five prevalent bacteria causing acute meningitis. APMIS 117, 856860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diallo, K et al. (2018) Development of a PCR algorithm to detect and characterize Neisseria meningitidis carriage isolates in the African meningitis belt. PLoS One 13, e0206453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksson, L et al. (2018) Whole-genome sequencing of emerging invasive Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W in Sweden. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 56, e01409-17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jolley, KA and Maiden, MC (2010) BIGSdb: scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Letunic, I and Bork, P (2007) Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 23, 127128.Google ScholarPubMed
Drew, RJ et al. (2021) Risk factors for carriage of meningococcus in third-level students in Ireland: an unsupervised machine learning approach. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 17, 37023709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackwell, CC et al. (1992) Factors affecting carriage of Neisseria meningitidis among Greek military recruits. Epidemiology & Infection 108, 441448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, HS et al. (2020) Meningococcal B vaccine and meningococcal carriage in adolescents in Australia. New England Journal of Medicine 382, 318327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tefera, Z et al. (2020) Carriage rate of Neisseria meningitidis, antibiotic susceptibility pattern and associated risk factors among primary school children in Gondar town, northwest Ethiopia. BMC Infectious Diseases 20, 358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jha, D and Ghosh, MK (1995) Epidemiology of meningococcal carrier state amongst recruits of a military training centre. Journal of Communicable Diseases 27, 250255.Google ScholarPubMed
Kamme, C and Kahlmeter, G (1979) Evaluation of spiramycin in meningococcal carriage. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 11, 229232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Public Health Agency of Sweden (2021) Meningokockinfektion – invasiv. [Internet] 2021 [cited 2022–10–24]. Available at https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/folkhalsorapportering-statistik/statistik-a-o/sjukdomsstatistik/meningokockinfektion-invasiv/.Google Scholar
Eriksson, L et al. (2020) Difference in virulence between Neisseria meningitidis serogroups W and Y in transgenic mice. BMC Microbiology 20, 92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, GR et al. (1998) Dynamics of carriage of Neisseria meningitidis in a group of military recruits: subtype stability and specificity of the immune response following colonization. Journal of Infectious Diseases 178, 451459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubilar, PS et al. (2018) Increase of Neisseria meningitidis W:cc11 invasive disease in Chile has no correlation with carriage in adolescents. PLoS One 13, e0193572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Wals, P et al. (1983) Longitudinal study of asymptomatic meningococcal carriage in two Belgian populations of schoolchildren. Journal of Infection 6, 147156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basta, NE et al. (2018) Meningococcal carriage within households in the African meningitis belt: a longitudinal pilot study. Journal of Infection 76, 140148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizek, CF et al. (2016) Comparison of methods to identify Neisseria meningitidis in asymptomatic carriers. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo 58, 60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collard, JM et al. (2014) A five-year field assessment of rapid diagnostic tests for meningococcal meningitis in Niger by using the combination of conventional and real-time PCR assays as a gold standard. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 108, 612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwood, BM et al. (2019) Narrative review of methods and findings of recent studies on the carriage of meningococci and other Neisseria species in the African Meningitis Belt. Tropical Medicine & International Health 24, 143154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brueggemann, AB et al. (2021) Changes in the incidence of invasive disease due to Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis during the COVID-19 pandemic in 26 countries and territories in the invasive respiratory infection surveillance initiative: a prospective analysis of surveillance data. Lancet Digital Health 3, e360e370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Distribution of students (n = 2744) participating in different combinations of the four sample occasions. Right-hand side: numbers of students participating once (n = 2251), twice (n = 309), three times (n = 146), and four times (n = 38).

Figure 1

Table 1. Characteristics of participating students assessed for carriage of N. meningitidis, presented data that applied during sampling of the 3459 samples

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Flow chart of throat samples in the analysis of carriage of N. meningitidis. In 10 samples, culture was missed due to human error.

Figure 3

Table 2. Unadjusted and adjusted analysis of risk factors for carriage of N. meningitidis for samples with accompanying questionnaire (carriers of N. meningitidis: 314/3459, 9.1%; 95% CI 8.2–10.1)

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationships of N. meningitidis carriage isolates (n = 241) presented as a circular phylogram with the corresponding clonal complexes in the outermost circle, and the corresponding groups in the second outermost circle. Cnl = capsule null locus, NG/ND = non-groupable / no data. The scale of the tree indicates 1% genes with allele differences out of the analysed 1422 genes.

Figure 5

Table 3. Study participants with more than one sample positive for carriage of N. meningitidis