Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-04T16:08:30.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Affective polarization in Latin America: A research note

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2024

Marcelo Bergman Open the ORCID record for Marcelo Bergman [Opens in a new window]  and
Pablo Fernández Open the ORCID record for Pablo Fernández [Opens in a new window]
Marcelo Bergman*
Affiliation:
Marcelo Bergman is a professor at the Universidad Tres de Febrero, Argentina
Pablo Fernández
Affiliation:
Pablo Fernández is a master’s student at the Universidad de San Andrés, Argentina. Argentina
*
Corresponding author:Marcelo Bergman; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Affective polarization (AP), a concept that summarizes intense partisans’ animosity towards opposing parties and positive feelings towards their own, has recently received increasing attention. Despite a growing interest in Latin American polarization, there are very few empirical studies on the range and depth of dislike and distrust towards political adversaries in the region, and how this impacts the quality of democracies. This research note uses survey data collected after ten election cycles in six countries to estimate the scope and depth of AP in the region. We measure the extent of polarization in Latin America compared to other Western nations, assess its evolution, and makes some inroads to explain who drives AP. On aggregate, Latin America does not show large AP scores, yet there are clear signs of an upward trend. More than a widespread social phenomenon, the evidence suggests that AP is driven by large intense minorities.

Keywords

affective polarizationidentity politicsdistrustLatin America
Type
Research Notes
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , February 2025 , pp. 114 - 132
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Miami

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bantel, I. 2023. Camps, Not Just Parties. The Dynamic Foundations of Affective Polarization in Multi-Party Systems. Electoral Studies 83: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, M. J., and McCarty, N.. 2015. Causes and Consequences of Polarization. In Solutions to Polarization in America, vol. 1, ed. Persily, N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 15–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlin, R. E., and Love, G. J.. 2018. Political Competition, Partisanship and Interpersonal Trust in Electoral Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 48, 1: 115–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro Cornejo, R. 2023. The AMLO Voter: Affective Polarization and the Rise of the Left in Mexico. Journal of Politics in Latin America 15, 1: 96–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comellas, J., and Torcal, M.. 2023. Ideological Identity, Issue-based Ideology and Bipolar Affective Polarization in Multiparty Systems: The Cases of Argentina, Chile, Italy, Portugal and Spain. Electoral Studies 83: 102615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, J. N., and Levendusky, M. S.. 2019. What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization? Public Opinion Quarterly 83, 1: 114–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidron, N., Adams, J., and Horne, W.. 2020. American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harteveld, E. 2021. Ticking All The Boxes? A Comparative Study of Social Sorting and Affective Polarization. Electoral Studies 72, April: 102337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harteveld, E., Mendoza, P., and Rooduijn, M. 2022. Affective Polarization and the Populist Radical Right: Creating the Hating? Gov. Oppos. 57: 703–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., and Westwood, S. J.. 2019. The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science 22: 129–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., and Lelkes, Y.. 2012. Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly 76, 3: 405–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, G., and Vomaro, G.. 2021. Polarización, consensos y política en la sociedad argentina reciente. Doc de Trabajo. Fundar. https://fund.ar/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Fundar-Polarizacion-consensos-y-politica-1.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2023.Google Scholar
Lelkes, Y. 2021. Policy Over Party: Comparing the Effects of Candidate Ideology and Party on Affective Polarization. Political Science Research and Methods 9, 1: 189–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lelkes, Y., and Westwood, S. J.. 2017. The Limits of Partisan Prejudice. The Journal of Politics 79, 2: 485–501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, M. 2013. How Partisan Media Polarize America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitzky, S., and Zabaleta, M.. 2018. ¿Por qué no hay partidos políticos en el Perú? Perú Breve, Spanish ed. (Madrid: Planeta).Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S. 2018. Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, L. 2015. “I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization. American Journal of Political Science 59, 1: 128–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, L. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, J., and Somer, M., eds. 2019. Polarizing Politics: A Global Threat to Democracy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681.Google Scholar
Reiljan, A. 2020. “Fear and Loathing across Party Lines” (also) in Europe: Affective Polarisation in European Party Systems. European Journal of Political Research 59, 2: 376–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, K. 2015. Changing Course in Latin America: Party Systems in the Neoliberal Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, K. M. 2002. Social Inequalities without Class Cleavages in Latin America’s Neoliberal Era. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 36, 4: 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segovia, C. 2022. Affective Polarization in Low-partisanship Societies. The case of Chile 1990–2021. Frontiers in Political Science 4: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segovia, C. 2023. Polarización afectiva, apoyo a la democracia y el rol mediador de ganadores y perdedores: un estudio comparado. Estudios Internaciones 205: 45–64 Google Scholar
Somer, M., McCoy, J. L., and Luke, R. E. 2021. Pernicious Polarization, Autocratization and Opposition Strategies. Democratization 28, 5: 929–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torcal, M., and Comellas, J. M.. 2022. Affective Polarisation in Times of Political Instability and Conflict. Spain from a Comparative Perspective. South European Society and Politics 27, 1: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voelkel, J. G., Chu, J., Stagnaro, M. N., Mernyk, J. S., Redekopp, C., Pink, S. L., and Willer, R.. 2023. Interventions Reducing Affective Polarization do not Necessarily Improve anti-Democratic Attitudes. Nature Human Behaviour 7, 1: 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, M. 2021. Affective Polarization in Multiparty Systems. Electoral Studies 69: 102199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waisbord, S. 2020. ¿Es válido atribuir la polarización política a la comunicación digital? Sobre burbujas, plataformas y polarización afectiva. Revista SAAP 14, 2: 248–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar