Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:07:37.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antipsychotics as particular types of sedatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2019

Joanna Moncrieff*
Affiliation:
University College London, London, UK
David Cohen
Affiliation:
UCLA Luskin, Los Angeles, CA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Joanna Moncrieff, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

We agree that it is important to establish whether antipsychotics are superior to other sedative drugs for the treatment of acute psychotic symptoms, and hence appreciate the review by Siafis et al. (Reference Siafis, Deste, Ceraso, Mussoni, Vita, Hasanagic and Leucht2019). We would like to correct a misperception of our work, however (Moncrieff & Cohen, Reference Moncrieff and Cohen2005). We did not suggest that antipsychotics are merely active placebos, nor that they are identical in their effects to other sedatives. In line with Siafis et al. (Reference Siafis, Deste, Ceraso, Mussoni, Vita, Hasanagic and Leucht2019), we pointed out that some trials found that antipsychotics were superior to barbiturates for the treatment of schizophrenia, but that current evidence has not established that they are different from benzodiazepines in their effectiveness. What we also suggested was that there is no evidence that antipsychotics, or any other drug prescribed for a mental disorder, produce their therapeutic effects by reversing an underlying brain-based abnormality. The effects of antipsychotics are more likely to be the result of the alterations to normal brain functioning that they produce. These alterations result in particular psychological and behavioural changes that are sometimes subtly and sometimes obviously different from those produced by other sedatives, and may be more effective in suppressing psychotic symptoms. Unlike barbiturate-like sedatives, antipsychotics produce a state of emotional indifference and reduced initiative and motivation alongside varying degrees of sedation and mental slowing, effects which can make psychotic symptoms less intense and intrusive. Indeed, this was the way that antipsychotics were thought to work by the pioneers of modern psychopharmacology in the 1950s and 1960s, who commented on the ‘psychic indifference’ (Anton-Stephens, Reference Anton-Stephens1954), ‘pathological tranquillity of mind’ (Winkelman, Reference Winkelman1957) and ‘psychomotor retardation’ (Deniker, Reference Deniker1960) antipsychotics produced based on detailed observations of how they affected people.

Understanding the effects of antipsychotics in this way is important because it explains why taking them can be so unpleasant for users, and makes sense of data suggesting that taking antipsychotics over the long-term can incur neurotoxicity as manifested in tardive dyskinesia and brain volume reduction (Moncrieff & Leo, Reference Moncrieff and Leo2010), and impair social functioning (Wunderink, Nieboer, Wiersma, Sytema, & Nienhuis, Reference Wunderink, Nieboer, Wiersma, Sytema and Nienhuis2013). Therefore, although we concur that antipsychotics can be useful treatments for acute psychosis, it is essential to ensure that they are not over-used, and that the balance of benefits and harms has been carefully and thoroughly researched in all situations, but especially in relation to long-term use.

Financial support

The authors did not receive any specific financial support for the submitted correspondence over and above their usual salaries from their regular employment.

Conflict of interest

Neither author have any financial conflicts of interest. Joanna Moncrieff is Chief Investigator for the NIHR-funded RADAR trial of antipsychotic reduction.

References

Anton-Stephens, D. (1954). Preliminary observations on the psychiatric uses of chlorpromazine (largactil). Journal of Mental Science, 100, 543557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deniker, P. (1960). Experimental neurological syndromes and the new drug therapies in psychiatry. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 1, 92102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moncrieff, J., & Cohen, D. (2005). Rethinking models of psychotropic drug action. Psychotherotherapy & Psychosomatics, 74, 145153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moncrieff, J., & Leo, J. (2010). A systematic review of the effects of antipsychotic drugs on brain volume. Psychological Medicine, 40, 14091422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siafis, S., Deste, G., Ceraso, A., Mussoni, C., Vita, A., Hasanagic, S.Leucht, S. (2019). Antipsychotic drugs v. barbiturates or benzodiazepines used as active placebos for schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, online first, 112. doi: 10.1017/S003329171900285XGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winkelman, N. W. Jr. (1957). An appraisal of chlorpromazine; general principles for administration of chlorpromazine, based on experience with 1090 patients. American Journal of Psychiatry 113, 961971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wunderink, L., Nieboer, R. M., Wiersma, D., Sytema, S., & Nienhuis, F. J. (2013). Recovery in remitted first-episode psychosis at 7 years of follow-up of an early dose reduction/discontinuation or maintenance treatment strategy: long-term follow-up of a 2-year randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 70, 913920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed