Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:33:43.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stimulated Raman Scattering of X-Mode Laser in a Plasma Channel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Sanjay Babu ,
Asheel Kumar Open the ORCID record for Asheel Kumar [Opens in a new window] ,
Ram Jeet ,
Arvind Kumar  and
Ashish Varma
Sanjay Babu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj 211002, India
Asheel Kumar*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj 211002, India
Ram Jeet
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj 211002, India
Arvind Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj 211002, India
Ashish Varma
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj 211002, India
*
Correspondence should be addressed to Asheel Kumar; [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Stimulated Raman forward scattering (SRFS) of an intense X-mode laser pump in a preformed parabolic plasma density profile is investigated. The laser pump excites a plasma wave and one/two electromagnetic sideband waves. In Raman forward scattering, the growth rate of the parametric instability scales as two-third powers of the pump amplitude and increases linearly with cyclotron frequency.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 2021 , 2021 , e12
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 Sanjay Babu et al.

1. Introduction

The propagation of intense laser pulses in plasma [Reference Regan, Bradley and Chirokikh1, Reference Sprangle, Esarey and Ting2] is relevant to various applications including laser-driven acceleration [Reference Fontana and Pantell3–Reference Shukla5], optical harmonic generation [Reference Lin, Chen and Kieffer6, Reference Zhou, Peatross, Murnane, Kapteyn and Christov7], X-ray laser [Reference Amendt, Eder and Wilks8], laser fusion [Reference Michael, Kruer, Wilks, Woodworth, Campbell and Perry9, Reference Deutsch, Furukawa, Mima, Murakami and Nishihara10], and magnetic field generation [Reference Gahn, Tsakiris and Pukhov11]. The laser-plasma interaction leads to a number of relativistic and nonlinear effects such as self-focusing [Reference Ting, Esarey and Sprangle12–Reference Sun, Ott, Lee and Guzdar14], parametric Raman and Brillouin instabilities [Reference Andreev, Kirsanov and Gorbunov15], filamentation and modulational instabilities [Reference Dalui, Bandyopadhyay and Das16–Reference Kourakis, Shukla and Morfill24], and soliton formation.

Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) is an important parametric instability in plasmas. In stimulated Raman forward scattering (SRFS), a high phase velocity Langmuir wave is produced that can accelerate electrons to high energy [Reference Sharma25–Reference Rousseaux, Malka, Miquel, Amiranoff, Baton and Mounaix35]. In stimulated Raman backward scattering (SRBS), electron plasma wave (EPW) has smaller phase velocity and can cause bulk heating of electrons. The high-amplitude laser wave enables the development of this instability in plasmas with a density significantly higher than the quarter critical density (nc/4), which is usually considered as the SRS density limit for lower laser intensities. Shvets et al. [Reference Shvets and Li36] have demonstrated that SRS is strongly modified in a plasma channel, where the plasma frequency varies radially through the radial dependence of the plasma density n 0(r). Liu et al. [Reference Liu and Tripathi37] have studied forward and backward Raman instabilities of a strong but nonrelativistic laser pump in a preformed plasma channel in the limit when plasma thermal effects may be neglected. Mori et al. [Reference Mori, Decker, Hinkel and Katsouleas38] have developed an elegant formalism of SRFS in one dimension (1D). Panwar et al. [Reference Panwar, Kumar and Ryu39] have studied SRFS of an intense pulse in a preformed plasma channel with a sequence of two pulses. They have studied the guiding of the main laser pulse through the plasma channel created by two lasers. Sajal et al. [Reference Sajal, Panwar and Tripathi40] have studied SRFS of a relativistic laser pump in a self-created plasma channel. Hassoon et al. [Reference Hassoon, Salih and Tripathi41] have studied the effect of a transverse static magnetic field on SRFS of a laser in a plasma. The X-mode excites an upper hybrid wave and two sidebands. They found that the growth rate of SRFS increases with the magnetic field. Gupta et al. [Reference Gupta, Yadav, Jang, Hur, Suk and Avinash42] have investigated SRS of laser in a plasma with energetic drifting electrons generated during laser-plasma interaction. They showed numerically that the relativistic effects increase the growth rate of the Raman instability and enhance the amplitude of the decay waves significantly.

Liu et al. [Reference Liu, Zhu, Cao, Zheng, He and Wang43] developed 1D Vlasov–Maxwell numerical simulation to examine RBS instability in unmagnetized collisional plasma. Their results showed that RBS is enhanced by electron-ion collisions. Kalmykov et al. [Reference Kalmykov and Shvets44] have studied RBS in a plasma channel with a radial variation of plasma frequency. Paknezhad et al. [Reference Paknezhad and Dorranian45] have investigated RBS of ultrashort laser pulse in a homogeneous cold underdense magnetized plasma by taking into account the relativistic effect of nonlinearity up to third order. The plasma is embedded in a uniform magnetic field. Kaur and Sharma [Reference Kaur and Sharma46] developed nonlocal theory of the SRBS in the propagation of a circularly polarized laser pulse through a hot plasma channel in the presence of a strong axial magnetic field. They established that the growth rate of SRBS of a finite spot size significantly decreases by increasing the magnetic field. Paknezhad et al. [Reference Paknezhad and Dorranian47] have studied the Raman shifted third harmonic backscattering of an intense extraordinary laser wave through a homogeneous transversely magnetized cold plasma. Due to relativistic nonlinearity, the plasma dynamics is modified in the presence of transverse magnetic field, and this can generate the third harmonic scattered wave and electrostatic upper hybrid wave via the Raman scattering process.

In this paper, we examine the SRFS of an X-mode laser pump in a magnetized plasma channel including nonlocal effects. In many experiments in high-power laser-plasma interaction, transverse magnetic fields are self-generated [Reference Gahn, Tsakiris and Pukhov11]. Laser launched from outside travels in X-mode in such magnetic fields and often creates parabolic density profiles. Thus, the current problem is relevant to experimental situations.

The ponderomotive force due to the front of laser pulse pushes the electrons radially outward on the time scale of a plasma period ω p − 1 , creating a radial space charge field, and modifies the electron density, where ωp is the electron plasma frequency. Laser and the sidebands exert a ponderomotive force on electrons driving the plasma wave. The density perturbation due to plasma wave beats with the oscillatory velocity due to laser pump to produce nonlinear currents, driving the sidebands.

In Section 2, we analyse the SRFS of a laser pump in a preformed channel with nonlocal effects. In Section 3, we discuss our results.

2. Raman Forward Scattering

Consider a two-dimensional plasma channel with a parabolic density profile immersed in a static magnetic field B s z ^ . The electron plasma frequency in the channel varies as

(1) ω p 2 = ω p 0 2 1 + y 2 L n 2 ,

where ωp0 is the plasma frequency at y = 0 and Ln is the density scale length. An X-mode laser propagates through the channel (cf. Figure 1),

(2) E 0 = A 0 y y ^ − ε 0 x y ε 0 x x x ^ e − i ω 0 t − k 0 x x .

Figure 1: Schematic of excitation of a Langmuir wave and two sidebands by an X-mode laser in a plasma channel.

The plasma permittivity at ω 0 is a tensor. Its components are

(3) ε 0 x x = ε 0 y y = 1 − ω p 2 ω 0 2 − ω c 2 , ε 0 x y = − ε 0 y x = i ω c ω 0 ω p 2 ω 0 2 − ω c 2 , ε 0 z z = 1 − ω p 2 ω 0 2 , ε 0 x z = ε 0 z x = ε 0 y z = ε 0 z y = 0 ,

where ω c = e B s / m is electron cyclotron frequency and e and m are the electronic charge and mass, respectively. Maxwell’s equations ∇ × E 0 = i ω 0 μ 0 H 0 and ∇ × H 0 = − i ω 0 ε s ε = 0 ⋅ E 0 combine to give the wave equation

(4) ∇ 2 E 0 − ∇ ∇ ⋅ E 0 + ω 0 2 C 2 ε 0 = ⋅ E 0 = 0 ,

where εs is the free space permittivity. Here, we chosen the plasma to be uniform and expressed the spatial-temporal variation of E0 as e − i ω 0 t − k 0 x x − k 0 y y we would obtain from equation (4), on replacing ∇ by i k 0 y y ^ + i k 0 x x ^ ,

(5) D 0 = ⋅ E 0 = 0 ,

where D 0 = = ω 0 2 / c 2 ε 0 = − k 0 2 I = + k 0 k 0 . Its matrix form is expressed as follows:

(6) D = 0 = ω 0 2 c 2 ε 0 x x − k 0 y 2 ω 0 2 c 2 ε 0 x y + k 0 x k 0 y 0 − ω 0 2 c 2 ε 0 x y + k 0 x k 0 y ω 0 2 c 2 ε 0 x x − k 0 2 0 0 0 ω 0 2 c 2 ε 0 z z − k 0 2 .

The local dispersion relation of the mode is given by D 0 = = 0 , which can be written as

(7) k 0 y 2 = ω 0 2 c 2 ε 0 x x 2 + ε 0 x y 2 ε 0 x x − k 0 x 2 = ω 0 2 c 2 1 − ω p 2 ω 0 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 − ω c 2 − k 0 x 2 .

Equation (2) gives E 0 x = − ε 0 x y / ε 0 x x E 0 y . To incorporate nonlocal effects, one may deduce the mode structure equation from the above equation by replacing k 0y by − i ∂ / ∂ y and operating over E 0y,

(8) ∂ 2 E 0 y ∂ y 2 + ω 0 2 c 2 1 − ω p 2 ω 0 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 − ω c 2 − k 0 x 2 E 0 y = 0.

Define

(9) β 0 1 / 4 y = ξ 0 , β 0 = ω p 0 2 ω 0 2 1 + ω c 2 ω 0 2 − ω c 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 2 ω 0 2 L n 2 c 2 , λ 0 = ω 0 2 c 2 1 − ω p 0 2 ω 0 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 − k 0 x 2 1 β 0 1 / 2 .

Equation (8) can be written as

(10) ∂ 2 E 0 y ∂ ξ 0 2 + λ 0 − ξ 0 2 E 0 y = 0.

The eigenvalue for the fundamental mode is λ0 = 1, and the eigenfunction is given by E 0 y = A 0 e − ξ 0 2 / 2 . From the eigenvalue condition, we obtain

(11) k 0 x 2 = ω 0 2 c 2 1 − ω p 0 2 ω 0 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 − β 0 1 / 2 .

The pump wave produces oscillatory electron velocity,

(12) v 0 x = − e m ω c E 0 y ω 0 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 , v 0 y = − i e m ω 0 2 − ω p 2 E 0 y ω 0 ω 0 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 , v 0 z = 0 ,

and parametrically excites a Langmuir wave with electrostatic potential,

(13) ϕ = ϕ y e − i ω t − k x ,

and two electromagnetic sidebands with electric fields,

(14) E j = A j y ^ − ε 1 x y ε 1 x x x ^ e − i ω j t − k j x ,

where j = 1,2 and ω1,2 = ω ∓ ω0, and k 1,2 = k ∓ k0. The sideband waves produce oscillatory electron velocities,

(15) v j x = − e m ω c E j y ω j 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 , v j y = − i e m ω j 2 − ω p 2 E j y ω j ω j 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 , v j z = 0 ,

where j = 1,2.

The sideband waves couple with the pump to exert a ponderomotive force on electrons at ω, k, F p ω = − m / 2 v 0 ⋅ ∇ v 1 + v 0 ∗ ⋅ ∇ v 2 + v 1 ⋅ ∇ v 0 + v 2 ⋅ ∇ v 0 ∗ − e / 2 v 0 × B 1 + v 1 × B 0 + v 0 ∗ × B 2 + v 2 × B 0 ∗ . In the limit, k 0 ≫ k , k1 and k2 are largely along x ^ , and the x and y components of the ponderomotive force turn out to be

(16) F p ω x = e 2 i P E 0 y E 1 y + Q E 0 y ∗ E 2 y 2 m ω 0 ω 1 ω 2 ω 0 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 , F p ω y = e 2 ω c R E 0 y E 1 y + S E 0 y ∗ E 2 y 2 m ω 0 ω 1 ω 2 ω 0 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 ,

where

(17) P = ω 2 k 1 − k 0 ω 1 ω 0 ω c 2 + k 1 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 − k 0 ω 1 2 − ω p 2 ω 0 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 , Q = ω 1 k 0 − k 2 ω 2 ω 0 ω c 2 − k 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 ω 2 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 + k 0 ω 2 2 − ω p 2 ω 0 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 , R = ω 2 k 0 ω 1 + k 1 ω 0 ω c 2 , S = ω 1 k 0 ω 2 + k 2 ω 0 ω c 2 ,

For ω ≪ ω 0 , F p ω = e ∇ φ p ; one may write

(18) ϕ p = V 01 E 1 y − η 1 η 2 E 2 y , V 01 = e E 0 y ω 1 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 − ω c 2 ω p 2 ω 0 2 m ω 0 ω 1 2 ω 0 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 ,

where

(19) η 1 = ω 1 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 ω 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 ω 2 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 + ω 0 ω c 2 ω p 2 , η 2 = ω 2 2 ω 2 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 ω 1 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 − ω 0 ω c 2 ω p 2 .

The drift velocity of plasma electrons due to electrostatic wave of potential φ in the component form is given by

(20) v ω x = − e m ω k ω 2 − ω c 2 ϕ , v ω y = − i e m ω c k ω 2 − ω c 2 ϕ , v ω z = 0.

The nonlinear velocity v ω N L due to ponderomotive force can be obtained from equation (20) by replacing φ by φp.

Using the equation of continuity, the linear and nonlinear density perturbations at ω, k can be obtained as

(21) n ω L = ∇ ⋅ n 0 0 y v ω i ω , n ω N L = ∇ ⋅ n 0 0 y v ω N L i ω .

Using these in Poisson’s equation, ∇ 2 φ = e / ε 0 n ω L + n ω N L , we obtain

(22) ϕ = − ω p 2 y ω 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 y ϕ p .

The nonlinear current densities at the sidebands can be written as

(23) J 1 N L = − 1 2 n e v 0 ∗ , J 2 N L = − 1 2 n e v 0 .

Using equation (23) in the wave equation, we obtain

(24) D = 1 ⋅ E 1 = − k 1 2 I = + k 1 k 1 + ω 1 2 c 2 ε 1 = ⋅ E 1 = k 2 e φ ω p 2 ω 1 E 0 y 2 m c 2 ω 0 ω 2 − ω c 2 ω 0 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 i ω 0 ω c x ^ + ω 0 2 − ω p 2 y ^ ,

where D = 1 = − k 1 2 I = + k 1 k 1 + ω 1 2 / c 2 ε 1 = , and

(25) D = 2 ⋅ E 2 = − k 2 2 I = + k 2 k 2 + ω 2 2 c 2 ε 2 = ⋅ E 2 = k 2 e ϕ ω p 2 ω 2 E 0 y 2 m c 2 ω 0 ω 2 − ω c 2 ω 0 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 − i ω 0 ω c x ^ + ω 0 2 − ω p 2 y ^ ,

where D = 2 = − k 2 2 I = + k 2 k 2 + ω 2 2 / c 2 ε 2 = .

Equations (24) and (25) on replacing k1y by − i ∂ / ∂ y for the sidebands can be written as

(26) d 2 E 1 y d ξ 1 2 + λ 1 − ξ 1 2 E 1 y = W 01 2 e − ξ 1 2 ξ 10 2 − ξ 1 2 E 1 y − η 1 η 2 E 2 y ,
(27) d 2 E 2 y d ξ 2 2 + λ 2 − ξ 2 2 E 2 y = W 02 2 e − ξ 2 2 ξ 20 2 − ξ 2 2 E 2 y − η 2 η 1 E 1 y ,
(28) ξ 1 2 = β 1 1 / 2 y 2 , ξ 2 2 = β 2 1 / 2 y 2 , ξ 2 = β 1 1 / 2 y 2 ≈ β 2 1 / 2 y 2 = β 1 1 / 2 β 0 1 / 2 ξ 0 2 ≈ ξ 0 2 , ξ 10 2 = ω 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 0 2 L n 2 β 1 1 / 2 ω p 0 2 , ξ 20 2 = ω 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 0 2 L n 2 β 2 1 / 2 ω p 0 2 , α 1 = ω 1 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 0 2 2 − k 1 x 2 c 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 ω p 0 4 c 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 0 2 , α 2 = ω 2 2 ω 2 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 0 2 2 − k 2 x 2 c 2 ω 2 2 − ω c 2 ω 2 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 ω p 0 4 c 2 ω 2 2 − ω c 2 ω 2 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 0 2 , β 1 = ω c 2 ω p 0 4 2 ω 1 2 − 2 ω c 2 − ω p 0 2 + ω 1 2 ω p 0 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 0 2 2 c 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 0 2 2 L n 2 = ω p 0 2 ω 1 2 1 + ω c 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 ω 1 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 2 ω 1 2 L n 2 c 2 , β 2 = ω c 2 ω p 0 4 2 ω 2 2 − 2 ω c 2 − ω p 0 2 + ω 2 2 ω p 0 2 ω 2 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 0 2 2 c 2 ω 2 2 − ω c 2 ω 2 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 0 2 2 L n 2 = ω p 0 2 ω 2 2 1 + ω c 2 ω 2 2 − ω c 2 ω 2 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 2 ω 2 2 L n 2 c 2 , λ 1 = α 1 β 1 1 / 2 = ω 1 2 c 2 1 − ω p 0 2 ω 1 2 ω 1 2 − ω p 0 2 ω 1 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 − k 0 x 2 1 β 1 1 / 2 , λ 2 = α 2 β 2 1 / 2 = ω 2 2 c 2 1 − ω p 0 2 ω 2 2 ω 2 2 − ω p 0 2 ω 2 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 − k 0 x 2 1 β 2 1 / 2 , V 01 = e E 0 y ω 1 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 − ω c 2 ω p 2 ω 0 2 m ω 0 ω 1 2 ω 0 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 , V 02 = − e E 0 y ω 1 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 − ω c 2 ω p 2 ω 0 2 m ω 0 ω 1 2 ω 0 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 η 1 η 2 , W 01 2 = e k 2 E 0 y L n 2 ω p 4 V 01 ω p 2 ω 0 ω c 2 − ω 1 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 2 m c 2 ω 0 ω p 0 2 ω 2 − ω c 2 ω 1 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 ω 0 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 , W 02 2 = e k 2 E 0 y L n 2 ω p 4 V 02 ω p 2 ω 0 ω c 2 + ω 2 ω 2 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 2 m c 2 ω 0 ω p 0 2 ω 2 − ω c 2 ω 2 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 ω 0 2 − ω c 2 − ω p 2 .

We solve equations (26) and (27) by the first-order perturbation theory. In the absence of nonlinear terms, the eigenfunctions for the fundamental mode satisfying equations (26) and (27) are

(29) E 1,2 = A 1,2 e − ξ 1 2 / 2 .

Corresponding eigenvalues are λ1,2 = 1. When the RHS of equations (26) and (27) are finite, we assume the eigenfunctions to remain unmodified; only the eigenvalues are changed a little. We substitute for E 1,2 from equation (29) in equations (26) and (27), multiply the resulting equations by e − ξ 2 / 2 , and integrate over ξ from −∞ to ∞. Then, we obtain

(30) λ 1 − 1 A 1 = − W 01 2 Z ξ 10 2 ξ 10 A 1 − η 1 η 2 A 2 ,
(31) λ 2 − 1 A 2 = − W 02 2 Z ξ 10 2 ξ 10 A 2 − η 2 η 1 A 1 ,

where Z ξ 10 2 is the plasma dispersion function. Equations (30) and (31) give the nonlinear dispersion relation

(32) 1 = − Z ξ 10 2 ξ 10 W 01 2 λ 1 − 1 + W 02 2 λ 2 − 1 .

This nonlinear dispersion relation is a function of the DC magnetic field. The dispersion relation is modified if one changes the value of the DC magnetic field. In the absence of the DC magnetic field,

(33) 1 = − Z ξ 10 ω c = 0 2 ξ 10 ω c = 0 W 01 2 ω c = 0 λ 1 ω c = 0 − 1 + W 02 2 ω c = 0 λ 2 ω c = 0 − 1 ,

where β 1 1 / 4 ω c = 0 y = ξ 1 ω c = 0 , β 2 1 / 4 ω c = 0 y = ξ 2 ω c = 0 , β 0 1 / 4 ω c = 0 y = ξ 0 ω c = 0 ,

(34) ξ 10 ω c = 0 = ω 2 − ω p 0 2 L n 2 β 1 1 / 2 ω c = 0 ω p 0 2 , λ 1 ω c = 0 = ω 1 2 c 2 1 − ω p 0 2 ω 1 2 ω 1 2 − ω p 0 2 ω 1 2 − ω p 0 2 − k 0 x 2 1 β 1 1 / 2 ω c = 0 , λ 2 ω c = 0 = ω 2 2 c 2 1 − ω p 0 2 ω 2 2 ω 2 2 − ω p 0 2 ω 2 2 − ω p 0 2 − k 0 x 2 1 β 2 1 / 2 ω c = 0 , β 1 ω c = 0 = ω p 0 2 L n 2 c 2 = β 2 ω c = 0 = β 0 ω c = 0 , V 01 ω c = 0 = e E 0 y ω 1 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 ω 1 2 − ω p 2 2 m ω 0 ω 1 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 ω 1 2 − ω p 2 , V 02 ω c = 0 = − e E 0 y ω 1 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 ω 1 2 − ω p 2 2 m ω 0 ω 1 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 ω 1 2 − ω p 2 η 1 ω c = 0 η 2 ω c = 0 , η 1 ω c = 0 = ω 1 2 ω 1 2 − ω p 2 ω 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 ω 2 2 − ω p 2 , η 2 ω c = 0 = ω 2 2 ω 2 2 − ω p 2 ω 1 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 ω 1 2 − ω p 2 , W 01 2 ω c = 0 = e k 2 E 0 y L n 2 ω p 4 V 01 ω c = 0 − ω 1 ω 1 2 − ω p 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 2 m c 2 ω 0 ω p 0 2 ω 2 ω 1 2 − ω p 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 , W 02 2 ω c = 0 = e k 2 E 0 y L n 2 ω p 4 V 02 ω c = 0 ω 2 ω 2 2 − ω p 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 2 m c 2 ω 0 ω p 0 2 ω 2 ω 2 2 − ω p 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 2 .

Taylor expanding λ1 − 1 with respect to variables ω1, k 1 and λ2 − 1 with respect to variables ω2,k 2 and substituting in equation (32), one obtains

(35) 1 = − Z ξ 10 2 ξ 10 W 01 2 ∂ λ 0 / ∂ ω 0 1 ω − k v g 0 + Δ − 1 ω − k v g 0 − Δ ,

where

(36) ∂ ω 0 ∂ k 0 = − ∂ λ 0 / ∂ k 0 ∂ λ 0 / ∂ ω 0 = v g 0 , Δ = Δ ′ 2 ∂ λ 0 / ∂ ω 0 , Δ ′ = ∂ 2 λ 0 ∂ ω 0 2 ω 2 + ∂ 2 λ 0 ∂ k 0 2 k 2 , ∂ λ 0 ∂ ω 0 = ∂ λ 0 − 1 ∂ ω 0 ≅ 1 β 0 2 ω 0 c 2 + 2 ω p 0 2 c 2 Δ 1 Δ 2 − ω p 0 L n c Δ 3 Δ 4 , ∂ 2 λ 0 ∂ ω 0 2 = 1 β 0 2 c 2 + 2 ω p 0 2 c 2 Δ 2 d 1 − Δ 1 d 2 Δ 2 2 − ω p 0 L n c Δ 4 d 3 − Δ 3 d 4 Δ 4 2 , ∂ λ 0 ∂ k 0 = − 2 k 0 β 0 , ∂ 2 λ 0 ∂ k 0 2 = − 2 β 0 , Δ 1 = ω 0 ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 ω p 0 2 − 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω 0 2 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 , Δ 2 = ω 0 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 2 , Δ 3 = − ω 0 ω c 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 , Δ 4 = ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 2 + ω c 2 ω 0 2 − ω c 2 1 / 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 2 , ∂ Δ 1 ∂ ω 0 = d 1 = ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 ω p 0 2 − 6 ω 0 2 − 2 ω 0 2 ω p 0 2 − 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 ω p 0 2 − 3 ω 0 2 , ∂ Δ 2 ∂ ω 0 = d 2 = 2 ω 0 ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 2 , ∂ Δ 3 ∂ ω 0 = d 3 = − ω c 2 3 ω 0 2 + ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 , ∂ Δ 4 ∂ ω 0 = d 4 = 4 ω 0 ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 2 + ω c 2 ω 0 2 − ω c 2 1 / 2 + ω 0 ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 ω 0 2 − ω p 0 2 − ω c 2 2 + ω c 2 ω 0 2 − ω c 2 − 1 / 2 .

Equation (35) gives

(37) ω − k v g 0 2 − Δ 2 = 2 Δ W 01 2 Z ξ 10 2 ∂ λ 0 / ∂ ω 0 ξ 10 .

We substitute the value of ξ10 and Z ξ 10 2 ≈ − 2 , also write ω = ω r + i γ , where ω r = k v g 0 = ω c 2 + ω p 0 2 , and obtain

(38) − 1 1 / 2 γ 3 = 2 2 W 01 2 ω p 0 Δ ∂ λ 0 / ∂ ω 0 L n β 1 1 / 4 e 2 i l π .

Equation (38) gives the growth rate

(39) γ = 2 2 W 01 2 ω p 0 Δ ∂ λ 0 / ∂ ω 0 L n β 1 1 / 4 1 / 3 sin 2 l π 3 .

For l = 1, the growth rate turns out to be

(40) γ = 3 2 2 2 W 01 2 ω p 0 Δ ∂ λ 0 / ∂ ω 0 L n β 1 1 / 4 1 / 3 .

In Figure 2, we have displayed the normalized growth rate γ / ω p 0 of the Raman forward scattering instability as a function of normalized pump wave amplitude e E 0 / m ω c for parameters: ω p 0 / ω 0 = 0.2 , L n ω p 0 / c = 8 , and ω c / ω p 0 = 1 . The growth rate increases with the amplitude of the laser pump. It does not go linearly but nearly as two-third powers of normalized laser amplitude. This is due to the fact that the width of the driven Langmuir mode is dependent on ponderomotive potential hence on pump amplitude. In Figure 3, we have displayed the normalized growth rate γ / ω p 0 of the Raman forward scattering as a function of normalized static magnetic field ω c / ω p 0 for ω p 0 / ω 0 = 0.2 , L n ω p 0 / c = 8 , and e E 0 / m ω c = 0.1 . In the absence of DC magnetic field, the growth rate γ / ω p 0 is minimum. It rises with magnetic field. The magnetic field raises the frequency of the driven plasma wave and brings in cyclotron effects in nonlinear coupling leading to enhancement of growth rate.

Figure 2: Normalized growth rate as a function of normalized amplitude of the pump wave in Raman forward scattering for (ωp0/ω0) = 0.2, L n ω p 0 / c = 8 , and ω c / ω p 0 = 1 .

Figure 3: Normalized growth rate as a function of normalized cyclotron frequency for ω p 0 / ω 0 = 0.2 , L n ω p 0 / c = 8 , and e E 0 / m ω c = 0.1 .

3. Discussion

The plasma channel with a parabolic density profile localizes the electromagnetic eigenmodes involved in the SRFS process within a width of the order c L n / ω p 0 1 / 2 . The Langmuir wave is more strongly localized, thus limiting the region of parametric interaction and reducing the growth rate. The static magnetic field modifies the electron response to these eigenmodes and significantly influences the nonlinear coupling. In the limit when the normalized growth rate γ / ω p 0 > k v t h , one may neglect thermal effects. The growth rate roughly scales as E 0 y 2 / 3 with pump amplitude and goes linearly with ambient magnetic field. For typical parameters, ω p 0 / ω 0 = 0.2 , L n ω p 0 / c = 8 , ω c / ω p 0 = 0.5 , and e E 0 / m ω c = 0.1 , the normalized growth rate is 0.26 whereas for ω p 0 / ω 0 = 0.2 , L n ω p 0 / c = 8 , ω c / ω p 0 = 1 , and e E 0 / m ω c = 0.8 , the normalized growth rate is 0.028 .

In the earlier work by Liu et al. [Reference Liu and Tripathi37] for the parameters ω p 0 / ω 0 = 0.2 and L n ω p 0 / c = 8 v 0 / c = 0.6 , the normalized growth rate is 0.06 whereas in our work for the parameters ω p 0 / ω 0 = 0.2 , L n ω p 0 / c = 8 , ω c / ω p 0 = 1 , and e E 0 / m ω c = 0.6 , the normalized growth rate is 0.025 Clearly, our results are in good agreement with the earlier work by Liu et al.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available upon request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

Regan, S. P., Bradley, D. K., Chirokikh, A. V. et al., “Laser-plasma interactions in long-scale-length plasmas under direct-drive national ignition facility conditions,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 6, no. 5, p. 2072, 1999.10.1063/1.873716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprangle, P., Esarey, E., and Ting, A., “Nonlinear theory of intense laser-plasma interactions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 64, 1990.10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fontana, J. R. and Pantell, R. H., “A high‐energy, laser accelerator for electrons using the inverse Cherenkov effect,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 54, no. 8, p. 4285, 1983.10.1063/1.332684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprangle, P., Esarey, E., Ting, A., and Joyce, G., “Laser wakefield acceleration and relativistic optical guiding,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 53, no. 22, p. 2146, 1988.10.1063/1.100300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, P. K., “Generation of wakefields by elliptically polarized laser pulses in a magnetized plasma,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 1363, 1999.10.1063/1.873383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, H., Chen, Li-M., and Kieffer, J. C., “Harmonic generation of ultra-intense pulses in underdense plasma,” Physical Review E, vol. 65, Article ID 036414, 2002.10.1103/PhysRevE.65.036414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., Peatross, J., Murnane, M. M., Kapteyn, H. C., and Christov, I. P., “Enhanced high-harmonic generation using 25 fs laser pulses,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 76, no. 5, p. 752, 1996.10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.752CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amendt, P., Eder, D. C., and Wilks, S. C., “X-ray lasing by optical-field-induced ionization,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 66, no. 20, p. 2589, 1991.10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2589CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michael, E., Kruer, W. L., Wilks, S. C., Woodworth, J., Campbell, E. M., and Perry, M. D., “Ignition and high gain with ultra-powerful lasers,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 1, p. 1626, 1994.Google Scholar
Deutsch, C., Furukawa, H., Mima, K., Murakami, M., and Nishihara, K., “Interaction physics of the fast ignitor concept,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 77, no. 12, p. 2483, 1996.10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2483CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gahn, C., Tsakiris, G. D., Pukhov, A. et al., “Multi-MeV electron beam generation by direct laser acceleration in high-density plasma channels,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 83, no. 23, p. 4772, 1999.10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ting, A., Esarey, E., and Sprangle, P., “Nonlinear wake‐field generation and relativistic focusing of intense laser pulses in plasmas,” Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics, vol. 2, no. 6, p. 1390, 1990.10.1063/1.859561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonsen, T. M. and Mora, P., “Self-focusing and Raman scattering of laser pulses in tenuous plasmas,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 69, no. 15, p. 2204, 1992.10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2204CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, G.-Z., Ott, E., Lee, Y. C., and Guzdar, P., “Self-focusing of short intense pulses in plasmas,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 30, no. 2, p. 526, 1987.10.1063/1.866349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreev, N. E., Kirsanov, V. I., and Gorbunov, L. M., “Stimulated processes and self‐modulation of a short intense laser pulse in the laser wake-field accelerator,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 2, no. 6, p. 2573, 1995.10.1063/1.871219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalui, S., Bandyopadhyay, A., and Das, K. P., “Modulational instability of ion acoustic waves in a multi-species collisionlessunmagnetized plasma consisting of nonthermal and isothermal electrons,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 24, Article ID 042305, 2017.Google Scholar
Jha, P., Gopal, S. R., and Upadhyay, A. K., “Pulse distortion and modulation instability in laser plasma interaction,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 16, Article ID 013107, 2009.10.1063/1.3072977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepehri Javan, N., “Competition of circularly polarized laser modes in the modulation instability of hot magneto plasma,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 20, Article ID 012120, 2013.10.1063/1.4789452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gharaee, H., Afghah, S., and Abbasi, H., “Modulational instability of ion-acoustic waves in plasmas with super thermal electrons,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 18, Article ID 032116, 2011.10.1063/1.3566006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, T. S., Kaur, H., Bansal, S., Saini, N. S., and Bala, P., “Modulational instability of electron-acoustic waves: an application to auroral zone plasma,” The European Physical Journal D, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 151–156, 2007.10.1140/epjd/e2006-00198-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha, P., Kumar, P., Raj, G., and Upadhyaya, A. K., “Modulation instability of laser pulse in magnetized plasma,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 123104, 2005.10.1063/1.2141399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H.-Y., Liu, S.-Q., and Li, X.-Q., “Modulation instability by intense laser beam in magnetized plasma,” Optik, vol. 122, no. 7, pp. 599–603, 2011.10.1016/j.ijleo.2010.04.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mora, P., Pesme, D., Heron, A., Laval, G., and Silvestre, N., “Modulational instability and its consequences for the beat-wave accelerator,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 61, p. 1611, 1998.10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kourakis, I., Shukla, P. K., and Morfill, G., “Modulational instability and localized excitations involving two nonlinearly coupled upper-hybrid waves in plasmas,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 7, p. 153, 2005.10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, P., “Stimulated Raman scattering of ultra intense hollow Gaussian beam in relativistic plasma,” Laser and Particle Beams, vol. 33, no. 3, p. 489, 2015.10.1017/S0263034615000488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verma, U. and Sharma, A. K., “Nonlinear electromagnetic Eigen modes of a self created magnetized plasma channel and its stimulated Raman scattering,” Laser and Particle Beams, vol. 29, no. 4, p. 471, 2011.10.1017/S0263034611000619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vyas, A., Sharma, S., Singh, R. K., Sharma, R. P., and Sharma, R. P., “Effect of the axial magnetic field on coexisting stimulated Raman and Brillouin scattering of a circularly polarized beam,” Laser and Particle Beams, vol. 35, no. 1, p. 19, 2017.10.1017/S0263034616000720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, R. L., Still, C. H., Williams, E. A., and Langdon, A. B., “On the dominant and subdominant behavior of stimulated Raman and Brillouin scattering driven by nonuniform laser beams,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 5, no. 12, p. 4337, 1998.10.1063/1.873171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkwood, R. K., Macgowan, B. J., Montgomery, D. S. et al., “Effect of ion-wave damping on stimulated Raman scattering in high-ZLaser-produced plasmas,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 77, no. 13, p. 2706, 1996.10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2706CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vyas, A., Singh, R. K., Sharma, R. P., Ram, K., and Sharma, R. P., “Study of coexisting stimulated Raman and Brillouin scattering at relativistic laser power,” Laser and Particle Beams, vol. 32, no. 4, p. 657, 2014.10.1017/S0263034614000688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreau, J. G., D’Humieres, E., Nuter, R., and Tikhonchuk, V. T., “Stimulated Raman scattering in the relativistic regime in near-critical plasmas,” Physical Review E, vol. 95, Article ID 013208, 2017.10.1103/PhysRevE.95.013208CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grebogi, C. and Liu, C. S., “Brillouin and Raman scattering of an extraordinary mode in magnetized plasma,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 23, p. 7, 1980.Google Scholar
Barr, H. C., Boyd, T. J. M., Gardner, G. A., and Rankin, R., “Raman backscatter from an inhomogeneous magnetized plasma,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 53, no. 5, p. 462, 1984.10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obenschain, S. P., Pawley, C. J., Mostovych, A. N. et al., “Reduction of Raman scattering in a plasma to convective levels using induced spatial incoherence,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 62, no. 7, p. 768, 1989.10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseaux, C., Malka, G., Miquel, J. L., Amiranoff, F., Baton, S. D., and Mounaix, P., “Experimental validation of the linear theory of stimulated Raman scattering driven by a 500-fs laser pulse in a preformed underdense plasma,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 74, no. 23, p. 4655, 1995.10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shvets, G. and Li, X., “Raman forward scattering in plasma channels,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 8, 2001.10.1063/1.1331566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, C. S. and Tripathi, V. K., “Stimulated Raman scattering in a plasma channel,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 3, no. 9, p. 3410, 1996.10.1063/1.871617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mori, W. B., Decker, C. D., Hinkel, D. E., and Katsouleas, T., “Raman forward scattering of short-pulse high-intensity lasers,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 72, no. 10, p. 1482, 1994.10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1482CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panwar, A., Kumar, A., and Ryu, C. M., “Stimulated Raman forward scattering of laser in a pre-formed plasma channel,” Laser and Particle Beams, vol. 30, no. 4, p. 605, 2012.10.1017/S0263034612000535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sajal, V., Panwar, A., and Tripathi, V. K., “Relativistic forward stimulated Raman scattering of a laser in a plasma channel,” Physica Scripta, vol. 74, no. 4, p. 484, 2006.10.1088/0031-8949/74/4/013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassoon, K., Salih, H., and Tripathi, V. K., “Stimulated Raman forward scattering of a laser in a plasma with transverse magnetic field,” Physica Scripta, vol. 80, Article ID 065501, 2009.10.1088/0031-8949/80/06/065501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, D. N., Yadav, P., Jang, D. G., Hur, M. S., Suk, H., and Avinash, K., “Onset of stimulated Raman scattering of a laser in the presence of hot drifting electrons,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 22, Article ID 052101, 2015.10.1063/1.4919626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z. J., Zhu, S.-P., Cao, L. H., Zheng, C. Y., He, X. T., and Wang, Y., “Enhancement of backward Raman scattering by electron-ion collisions,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 16, no. 11, Article ID 112703, 2009.10.1063/1.3258839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalmykov, S. Y. and Shvets, G., “Stimulated Raman backscattering of laser radiation in deep plasma channels,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 4686, 2004.10.1063/1.1778743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paknezhad, A. and Dorranian, D., “Nonlinear backward Raman scattering in the short laser pulse interaction with a cold underdense transversely magnetized plasma,” Laser and Particle Beams, vol. 29, no. 3, p. 373, 2011.10.1017/S0263034611000474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaur, S. and Sharma, A. K., “Stimulated Raman scattering of a laser in a magnetized plasma channel,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 18, Article ID 092105, 2011.10.1063/1.3622331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paknezhad, A., Dorranian, D., “Third harmonic stimulated Raman backscattering of laser in a magnetized plasma,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 20, Article ID 092108, 2013.10.1063/1.4821033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1: Schematic of excitation of a Langmuir wave and two sidebands by an X-mode laser in a plasma channel.

Figure 1

Figure 2: Normalized growth rate as a function of normalized amplitude of the pump wave in Raman forward scattering for (ωp0/ω0) = 0.2, Lnωp0/c=8, and ωc/ωp0=1.

Figure 2

Figure 3: Normalized growth rate as a function of normalized cyclotron frequency for ωp0/ω0=0.2, Lnωp0/c=8, and eE0/mωc=0.1.