Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:32:54.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Drug cue induced overshadowing: selective disruption of natural reward processing by cigarette cues amongst abstinent but not satiated smokers – Corrigendum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2012

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Corrigendum
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 42 , Issue 6 , June 2012 , pp. 1341
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

In our recently published study (Freeman et al. Reference Freeman, Morgan, Beesley and Curran2012) the data in Table 3 are incorrectly presented. The data should have been multiplied by 10; however, the statistical analysis and interpretation remain unchanged. We apologize for this error and present the correct data below.

Table 3. Group means (standard deviations) for choice×importance ratings to the control cue and blocked cues (neutral cue blocked by a neutral cue, neutral cue blocked by a drug cue, drug cue blocked by a neutral cue)

References

Freeman, TP, Morgan, CJA, Beesley, T, Curran, HV (2012). Drug cue induced overshadowing: selective disruption of natural reward processing by cigarette cues amongst abstinent but not satiated smokers. Psychological Medicine 42, 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 3. Group means (standard deviations) for choice×importance ratings to the control cue and blocked cues (neutral cue blocked by a neutral cue, neutral cue blocked by a drug cue, drug cue blocked by a neutral cue)