Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:23:21.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tuna regional fisheries management organizations and the conservation of sea turtles: a reply to Godley et al.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2020

Juan Antonio Camiñas
Affiliation:
Asociación Herpetológica Española, Madrid, Spain
Andrés Domingo
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Recursos Pelagicos, Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos, Ministerio de Ganadería Agricultura y Pesca, Montevideo, Uruguay
Rui Coelho
Affiliation:
Portuguese Institute for the Ocean and Atmosphere, Olhão, Portugal
Paul De Bruyn
Affiliation:
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, Victoria, Seychelles
Francisco Abascal
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Tenerife, Spain
Jose Carlos Baéz*
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Fuengirola, Spain.
*
(Corresponding author) E-mail [email protected]

Abstract

Type
Letter
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International

Fisheries bycatch, in particular in tuna and tuna-like fisheries, is one of the main causes of sea turtle declines (Lewison et al., Reference Lewison, Crowder, Wallace, Moore, Cox and Zydelis2014). Godley et al. (Reference Godley, Broderick, Colman, Formia, Godfrey and Hamann2020) described some of the actions being carried out internationally for the sea turtle conservation. Although they acknowledged there have been efforts to understand the effects of commercial fisheries bycatch, they did not address ongoing initiatives for sea turtle bycatch. Here, we outline actions taken by tuna regional fisheries management organizations.

Scientific advice and the management of fisheries targeting tuna and tuna-like species are provided by tuna regional fisheries management organizations. In chronological order by founding, these are the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (1949), the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (1966), the Indo-Pacific Tuna Program (prior to 1980), the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (1993), and the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (2004). These organizations, supported by their respective Scientific Committees, cover all the oceans and main seas (including most sea turtle ranges), are intergovernmental, and are responsible for data collection, monitoring and management of tuna and tuna-like resources, including associated bycatch.

The scientists working with these organizations provide annual information on turtle bycatch. There have been several recent initiatives, including impact assessments (Nel et al., Reference Nel, Wanless, Angel, Mellet and Harris2013; Angel et al., Reference Angel, Nel, Wanless, Mellet, Harris and Wilson2014; Williams et al., Reference Williams, Georgeson, Summerson, Hobday, Hartog and Fuller2018) and bycatch mitigation measures for pelagic fisheries management (Coelho et al., Reference Coelho, Fernandez-Carvalho and Santos2013). An example is the work of some contracting parties collaborating in the identification of sea turtle bycatch patterns in longline and purse seine tuna fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea and South Indian Ocean (Anon., 2020). Similarly, there have been a number of studies within the framework of other tuna regional fisheries management organizations, ranging from the initiatives of individual research groups to coordinated basin-scale or global initiatives. These efforts are illustrated by the Bycatch Mitigation Information System, launched by the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission and later expanded and supported by the FAO Common Oceans Tuna Project (Fitzsimmons et al., Reference Fitzsimmons, Abraham, Caillot and Smith2019).

To continue reducing bycatch of non-target species, including sea turtles, the first joint tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organization Bycatch Working Group meeting was organized in December 2019 in Porto, Portugal, to rejuvenate the process of coordination between the organizations on bycatch issues (Anon., 2019).

References

Angel, A., Nel, R., Wanless, R.M., Mellet, B., Harris, L. & Wilson, I. (2014) Ecological risk assessment of sea turtles to tuna fishing in the ICCAT region. Collective Volume of Scientific Paper ICCAT, 70, 22262259.Google Scholar
Anon. (2019) Chair's Report of the 1st Joint Tuna RFMO By-Catch Working Group Meeting (16–18 December 2019, Porto, Portugal). iccat.int/Documents/meetings/docs/2019/reports/2019_JWGBY-CATCH_ENG.pdf [accessed 9 October 2020].Google Scholar
Anon. (2020) Report of the 2nd Workshop on Collaborative Work to Assess Sea Turtle Bycatch in Pelagic Longline Fleets (Atlantic and Indian Oceans and Mediterranean Sea). SCRS/2020/040. International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Coelho, R., Fernandez-Carvalho, J. & Santos, M.N. (2013) A review of sea turtle mitigation measures across the five tuna RFMO and other fisheries management organizations. Collective Volume of Scientific Paper ICCAT, 69, 18601866.Google Scholar
Fitzsimmons, L., Abraham, E., Caillot, S. & Smith, N. (2019) An Update on the Bycatch Management Information System (BMIS): Developments in 2018-19 Including the Integration of Data Visualisation and Mapping for Bycatch Data. In WCPFC Scientific Committee 15th Regular Session. WCPFC-SC15-2019/EB-IP-01, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia.Google Scholar
Godley, B.J., Broderick, A.C., Colman, L.P., Formia, A., Godfrey, M.H., Hamann, M. et al. (2020) Reflections on sea turtle conservation. Oryx, 54, 287289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewison, R.L., Crowder, L.B., Wallace, B.P., Moore, J.E., Cox, T., Zydelis, R. et al. (2014) Global patterns of marine mammal, seabird, and sea turtle bycatch reveal taxa-specific and cumulative megafauna hotspots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 52715276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nel, R., Wanless, R.M., Angel, A., Mellet, B. & Harris, L. (2013) Ecological Risk Assessment and Productivity—Susceptibility Analysis of Sea Turtles Overlapping with Fisheries in the IOTC Region. 9th Working Party on Ecosystems and Bycatch, Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, La Réunion, France. iotc.org/sites/default/files/documents/2014/01/IOTC-2013-WPEB09-23_-_Marine_turtle_ERA.pdf [accessed 9 October 2020].Google Scholar
Williams, A.J., Georgeson, L., Summerson, R., Hobday, A., Hartog, J., Fuller, M. et al. (2018) Assessment of the Vulnerability of Sea Turtles to IOTC Tuna Fisheries. 14th Working Party on Ecosystems and Bycatch, Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, Cape Town, South Africa. iotc.org/sites/default/files/documents/2018/08/IOTC-2018-WPEB14-40.pdf [accessed 9 October 2020].Google Scholar