No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Ideography, Blissymbolics, standardization, and emergent conformity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 October 2023
Abstract
There is an extensive literature on the usage of Blissymbolics in augmentative and alternative communication that contradicts Morin's contention that it fails as an ideography. Morin's notion of “standardization” (target article, sect. X, para. X) is at odds with the highly developed understanding of this notion in linguistics. What Morin seems to have in mind corresponds to the notion of emergence in iterative and multiagent models of language learning.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Adams, F. (2020). Global aphasia and the language of thought. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia, 35(1), 9–27.Google Scholar
Beck, A., & Fritz, H. (1998). Can people who have aphasia learn iconic codes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14(3), 184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burroughs, J. A., Albritton, E., Eaton, B., & Montague, J. (1990). A comparative study of language delayed preschool children's ability to recall symbols from two symbol systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6(3), 202–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmeli, S., & Shen, Y. (1998). Semantic transparency and translucency in compound Blissymbols. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14(3), 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. R. (1981). Learning words using traditional orthography and the symbols of Rebus, Bliss, and Carrier. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46(2), 191–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ecklund, S., & Reichle, J. (1987). A comparison of normal children's ability to recall symbols from two logographic systems. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 18(1), 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funnell, E., & Allport, A. (1989). Symbolically speaking: Communicating with Blissymbols in aphasia. Aphasiology, 3, 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, E. (1966a). Dialect, language nation. American Anthropologist, 68(6), 922–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, E. (1966b). Language conflict and language planning: The case of modern Norwegian. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, S., Griffiths, T., & Smith, K. (2014). Iterated learning and the evolution of language. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 28, 108–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morin, O., Kelly, P., & Winters, J. (2020). Writing, graphic codes, and asynchronous communication. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(2), 727–743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muter, P. (1986). Blissymbolics, cognition, and the handicapped (9, Trans.). In Hjelmquist, E. & Nilsson, L.-G. (Eds.), Communication and handicap: Aspects of psychological compensation and technical aid.Google Scholar
Okrent, A. (2010). In the land of invented languages: Esperanto rock stars, Klingon poets, Loglan lovers, and the mad dreamers who tried to build a perfect language. Random House.Google Scholar
Poupart, A., Trudeau, N., & Sutton, A. (2013). Construction of graphic symbol sequences by preschool-aged children: Learning, training, and maintenance. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(1), 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standard Languages. (2023). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_languageGoogle Scholar
Van Mol, M. (2003). Variation in modern standard Arabic in radio news broadcasts: A synchronic descriptive investigation into the use of complementary particles. Peeters.Google Scholar
Wood, C., Storr, J., & Reich, P. (1992). Blissymbol reference guide. Blissymbolics Communication International.Google Scholar
Target article
The puzzle of ideography
Related commentaries (26)
A bigger problem for ideography: The pervasiveness of linguistic structure
A cognitive account of the puzzle of ideography
A source- and channel-coding approach to the analysis and design of languages and ideographies
Bypass language en route to meaning at your peril
Chinese offers a test for universal cognitive processes
Communication consistency, completeness, and complexity of digital ideography in trustworthy mobile extended reality
Emoji use validates the potential for meaning standardization among ideographic symbols
Fractals and artificial intelligence to decrypt ideography and understand the evolution of language
Functional ideographies are composite semiotic systems
Graphic codes, language, and the computational niche
How standardized must a code be to be useful?
Ideography in interaction
Ideography insight from facial recognition and neuroimaging
Ideography, Blissymbolics, standardization, and emergent conformity
Mind the gap: Why is there no general purpose ideographic system?
Notational systems are distinct cognitive systems with different material prehistories
On the semiotic and material constraints of ideographies
Pragmatic interpretation and the production of ideographic codes
The centrality of practice in ideographic communication, and the perennial puzzle of positivistic thinking
The design space of human communication and the nonevolution of ideography
The different paths to cultural convergence
The disadvantage of ideography
The feasibility of ideography as an empirical question for a science representational systems design
The stranding of the ideography: A nonnegligible role of the spoken language
Visual languages and the problems with ideographies: A commentary on Morin
Why the use of ideographic codes does not improve communicative skills in patients with severe aphasia?
Author response
Puzzling out graphic codes