Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:54:19.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alarming decline of the Great Bustard Otis tarda world population over the last two decades

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2022

JUAN C. ALONSO*
Affiliation:
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Madrid, Spain.
CARLOS PALACÍN
Affiliation:
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Madrid, Spain.
*
*Author for correspondence; email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Since 2005, the world population of Great Bustards Otis tarda has decreased at an annual rate of 3.23%. The current world total is estimated at 31,000–36,000 birds, 34% (range 30–38%) less than 16 years ago. The declines have been observed in nine of 17 countries with extant breeding populations, with highest values in China (-89%) and European Russia (-72%). Marked decreases have also occurred in the Iberian Peninsula, which is still the stronghold for the species with 70–75% of the world population. Within Iberia, declines are particularly alarming in Portugal (-50%), although perhaps even more concerning in Spain, where the -28% (range 25–30%) decrease implies a loss of more than 8,000 individuals. Increases have been only recorded in Germany, Austria, and at a smaller scale in Hungary (respectively, 202%, 91%, and 5%), thanks to continued and intensive conservation actions, and also in the small group breeding in Romania, likely due to dispersal from the increasing West Pannonian population. The isolated populations of Morocco and Iran are on the brink of extinction. More surveys are still needed in Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, China, and Mongolia, to confirm numbers and trends. It is urgent to reinforce conservation actions worldwide to stop negative demographic trends and ensure the survival of the species. If current trends continue, IUCN should perhaps consider whether (a) conditions are met to upgrade the species’ Red List category from globally ‘Vulnerable’ to ‘Endangered’, and (b) the two subspecies should be treated as separate conservation units and require different conservation strategies.

Type
Short Communication
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of BirdLife International

Introduction

Steppe birds are one of the bird groups currently showing greatest population declines, which is a cause of conservation concern (BirdLife International 2018). Bustards (Otididae) are particularly vulnerable, since many of their species share farmland habitat with humans, and thus their status should be evaluated regularly in order to prevent severe declines and extinctions (Collar et al. Reference Collar, Baral, Batbayar, Bhardwaj, Brahma, Burnside, Choudhury, Combreau, Dolman, Donald, Dutta, Gadhavi, Gore, Goroshko, Hong, Jathar, Jha, Jhala, Koshkin, Lahkar, Liu, Mahood, Morales, Narwade, Natsagdorj, Nefedov, Silva, Thakuri, Wang, Zhang and Kessler2017, BirdLife International 2018). Great Bustard Otis tarda and Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax are two well-known species of this family living in the Palearctic, a region subjected to high human pressure, land-use changes and agricultural intensification. It is therefore most important to monitor their status and keep it up-to-date (e.g. Morales and Bretagnolle Reference Morales and Bretagnolle2021 for the Little Bustard).

The last assessment of the Great Bustard Otis tarda status estimated the world population at 44,000–57,000 individuals (Alonso and Palacín Reference Alonso and Palacín2010). With only minor amendments, this estimate was later used in subsequent revisions, which either cautiously expressed a lack of optimism about the future of the species worldwide due to the apparently recent decreases in Russia, uncertainty about numbers and trends in several countries like Mongolia, China, Turkey, or Ukraine, and signs of decline in some areas of the Iberian Peninsula, the species’ main stronghold (Alonso Reference Alonso2014), or explicitly considered Great Bustards to be undergoing a moderate decline which could increase into the future (BirdLife International 2017). These reviews recommended keeping the species’ status as ‘Vulnerable’ and carrying out further surveys to confirm numbers. Here we present a new update of the world status of the Great Bustard.

Methods

The latest available Great Bustard counts and estimates were collected from all countries with extant populations. We reviewed all census results published in scientific papers, presented at international conferences, communicated through websites of bird conservation organizations, or included in unpublished technical reports. In addition, we contacted most researchers working with the species in each country to ask them for the latest unpublished counts (Appendix S1 in the online supplementary material). The resulting figures were compared with those from Alonso and Palacín (Reference Alonso and Palacín2010) to establish demographic trends between these two comprehensive updates. In the case of Spain, the estimate consisted of counts from different years and/or regions, and a weighted average census year was calculated for the whole country. This was also the procedure used in Alonso and Palacín (Reference Alonso and Palacín2010). In all other countries, where detailed information on numbers and survey years in each region was lacking, the first and last survey years were taken from published or unpublished national surveys and the mean of these year intervals was used as year of estimate. The criteria used to evaluate the quality of counts were those described in Palacín and Alonso (Reference Palacín and Alonso2008).

The population trend between the last comprehensive assessment (Alonso and Palacín Reference Alonso and Palacín2010) and the current estimate (this study) was assessed by means of (a) the percentage change in population size between the weighted average census years in both assessments; for population size we used the mean value between minimum and maximum figures of the estimate for each country; and (b) the population growth rate (Sibly and Hone Reference Sibly and Hone2002). We used the standard equation defining exponential growth N t+1 = N te rt where N t+1 is the population size at time t+1, N t is the population size at time t, r is the rate of natural increase (also known as instantaneous growth rate, intrinsic rate of increase, or exponential rate of increase), t is the time interval, and e is the base of natural logarithms. The growth rates are expressed as annual population increase or decrease values in Table 1.

Table 1. Recent changes in Great Bustard numbers in countries with extant breeding populations, ordered by numbers of birds in 2005.

1 Alonso and Palacín (Reference Alonso and Palacín2010).

2 this review; 2018 is the weighted average census year of all counts in this column (see Methods).

3 annual rate of increase.

4 Russia: 380–430, Mongolia: ca. 1,000, China: 600.

5 unknown trend due to uncertain estimate in 2012.

6 unknown trend due to uncertain estimate in 1990-1996.

7 population reintroduced through artificial incubation of eggs or release of young birds imported from Russia and Spain 2004-2019; these birds are not included in the total, because this population is not yet considered self-sustaining (BOU 2017) and was therefore not assessed in the last review of birds of conservation concern in UK (Stanbury et al. Reference Stanbury, Eaton, Aebischer, Balmer, Brown, Douse, Lindley, McCulloch, Noble and Win2021).

8 weighted average year of all counts in this column.

References (for the current status only; for the status in 2005 see references in Alonso and Palacín Reference Alonso and Palacín2010):

Spain: Palacín and Alonso (Reference Palacín, Alonso and López-Jiménez2021); European Russia: Mischenko et al. (Reference Mischenko, Belik, Borodin, Sarychev, Sukhanova, Krasnov, Preobrazhenskaya, Malovichko, Shepel, Yakovleva, Morozov, Volkov, Sharikov, Grishanov, Rykova, Yakovlev, Yakovlev, Spiridonov, Lapshin, Rakhimov, Moskvichev, Karyakin, Piskunov, Antonchikov, Muraviev, Korkina and Frolov2017); Asian Russia: Kessler and Smith (Reference Kessler and Smith2014), Kessler (Reference Kessler2015); NW China (Xinjiang): Wang et al. (Reference Wang, González, Yang, Neuhaus, Blanco-Fontao and Ruckstuhl2018); Mongolia, SE Russia, NE China: Mi et al. (Reference Mi, Falk and Guo2016), Collar et al. (Reference Collar, Baral, Batbayar, Bhardwaj, Brahma, Burnside, Choudhury, Combreau, Dolman, Donald, Dutta, Gadhavi, Gore, Goroshko, Hong, Jathar, Jha, Jhala, Koshkin, Lahkar, Liu, Mahood, Morales, Narwade, Natsagdorj, Nefedov, Silva, Thakuri, Wang, Zhang and Kessler2017), Liu et al. (Reference Liu, Hu, Shafer, Gong, Han, Yu, Zhou, Bai, Meng, Yu and Dang2017); Portugal: ICNF & LPN (2021); Hungary: L. Miklós (in litt., 2021); Turkey: Özgencil et al. (Reference Özgencil, Akarsu, Karatas, Gürsoy-Ergen, Saygili-Yigit, Karakaya and Soyluer2021); Ukraine: Andryuschchenko (Reference Andryuschenko2013, in litt. 2021); Austria: R. Raab (pers. comm. 2021), LIFE Great Bustard (2021); Germany: Förderverein Grosstrappenschutz (in litt. 2021), T. Langgemach (in litt. 2021); LIFE Great Bustard (2021); Morocco: Alonso et al. (Reference Alonso, Palacín and Onrubia2019), Qninba et al. (Reference Qninba, El Khamlichi, Cherkaoui, Jabran, Noaman, Alazouer, Zemrani, Lakhdar, Adrafin and Bouamama2019); Iran: Barati et al. (Reference Barati, Abdulkarimi and Alonso2015); Kazakhstan: Mityaev and Yashchenko (Reference Mityaev and Yashchenko2006), Kessler and Smith (Reference Kessler and Smith2014), Collar et al. (Reference Collar, Baral, Batbayar, Bhardwaj, Brahma, Burnside, Choudhury, Combreau, Dolman, Donald, Dutta, Gadhavi, Gore, Goroshko, Hong, Jathar, Jha, Jhala, Koshkin, Lahkar, Liu, Mahood, Morales, Narwade, Natsagdorj, Nefedov, Silva, Thakuri, Wang, Zhang and Kessler2017), Martín et al. (Reference Martin, Guerin, Fages, Martineau and Hingrat2018); Serbia: L. Miklós (in litt. 2021); Slovakia: Hrabkovsky (Reference Hrabkovsky2018); Romania: L. Miklós (in litt. 2021); UK: Waters (Reference Waters2018), Wiltshire Wildlife (2021), see also Stanbury et al. (Reference Stanbury, Eaton, Aebischer, Balmer, Brown, Douse, Lindley, McCulloch, Noble and Win2021).

Results and Discussion

The Great Bustard world population has declined by c.17,500 individuals (range 13,361–21,603) since 2005, which means a 34.6% decrease (range 30.3–37.9%) in 13 years, at an annual average decrease rate of -3.23% (Table 1). This represents a radical change in the demographic trend observed in previous decades, when total numbers were estimated to be not decreasing, based on the stable to slightly increasing tendency observed in Spain, the species’ main stronghold, after the hunting ban in 1980 (Alonso and Alonso Reference Alonso and Alonso1996, Alonso et al. Reference Alonso, Palacín and Martín2003, Reference Alonso, Palacín and Martín2005, Palacín and Alonso Reference Palacín and Alonso2008, Alonso and Palacín Reference Alonso and Palacín2010). Interestingly, the decline reported in this study was foreseen as a possibility by the authors of the last IUCN assessment, and therefore the category of ‘Vulnerable’ was retained for this species (BirdLife International 2017). However, no census data were available on that date to confirm any new trend, and the present study confirms for the first time that an important decline has taken place over the last decade and a half.

During the last one or two decades, demographic declines have occurred at least in nine of 17 countries with extant breeding populations, with highest values in China (-89%) and European Russia (-72%) (Table 1). However, perhaps more worrying declines due, to the numbers involved, are those that have occurred in the Iberian Peninsula, which holds 70–75% of the world population. The decline is particularly pronounced in Portugal (-50%), although more troubling in Spain, where the drop of -28% (range 25–30%) implies more than 8,000 birds (range 7,400–10,300) lost since 2004–2010 (Table 1).

Current data do not allow reliable trends to be established in Ukraine, where no surveys have been carried out in the last 15 years, and in Kazakhstan, where numbers were probably underestimated in the 1990–1996 assessment, and are still quite imprecise today (Mityaev and Yashchenko Reference Mityaev and Yashchenko2006, Kessler Reference Kessler and Smith2014). More surveys are needed in these two countries, as well as in Russia, China, and Mongolia, to confirm numbers and trends (Collar et al. Reference Collar, Baral, Batbayar, Bhardwaj, Brahma, Burnside, Choudhury, Combreau, Dolman, Donald, Dutta, Gadhavi, Gore, Goroshko, Hong, Jathar, Jha, Jhala, Koshkin, Lahkar, Liu, Mahood, Morales, Narwade, Natsagdorj, Nefedov, Silva, Thakuri, Wang, Zhang and Kessler2017).

Significant demographic increases have only been recorded in Germany and Austria (respectively, 202% and 91% in little more than a decade), and at a smaller scale also in Hungary (5%), thanks to continued and intensive conservation actions (www.grosstrappe.de, www.grosstrappe.at, Raab et al. Reference Raab, Schutz, Spakovszky, Julius and Schulze2012, Faragó et al. Reference Faragó, Spakovszky and Raab2014), as well as in the small group breeding in Romania, likely due to dispersal from the increasing West Pannonian population (Table 1).

The isolated populations of Morocco and Iran are on the brink of extinction, and deserve special attention due to their contribution to the overall genetic diversity of the species, and their strategic location, respectively in the south-western end of the distribution range, and between the European and Asian continents. The Moroccan population is the only one of this species on the African continent (Palacín et al. Reference Palacín, Martín, Onrubia and Alonso2016). Great Bustards there seem to be genetically isolated from Iberian birds, and thus may be regarded as a separate management unit (Alonso et al. Reference Alonso, Martín, Alonso, Lieckfeldt, Magaña, Palacín and Pitra2009, Hórreo et al. Reference Hórreo, Alonso, Palacín and Milá2014). Iranian Great Bustards are also relatively isolated from the closest populations (i.e. Turkey), and might as well represent a genetically independent unit (Barati et al. Reference Barati, Abdulkarimi and Alonso2015).

As for the causes of the reported declines, agricultural intensification has been mentioned in first place by most authors (Palacín and Alonso Reference Palacín and Alonso2018), followed by collision with power lines (Barrientos et al. Reference Barrientos, Ponce, Palacín, Martín, Martín and Alonso2012, Vadász and Lóránt Reference Vadász and Lóránt2015, Palacín et al Reference Palacín, Alonso, Martín and Alonso2017) and poaching (e.g. in China, Mongolia and parts of Russia; Collar et al. Reference Collar, Baral, Batbayar, Bhardwaj, Brahma, Burnside, Choudhury, Combreau, Dolman, Donald, Dutta, Gadhavi, Gore, Goroshko, Hong, Jathar, Jha, Jhala, Koshkin, Lahkar, Liu, Mahood, Morales, Narwade, Natsagdorj, Nefedov, Silva, Thakuri, Wang, Zhang and Kessler2017). The lack of invertebrate food for chicks, caused by an increasing use of pesticides and other agro-chemicals, is surely the main factor determining the low juvenile productivity values observed in recent years in many areas, including some Iberian regions (authors’ unpubl. data). Maintenance of High Nature Value (HNV) farming systems, like Mediterranean dry farmland, with high diversity of land-use types, is essential for the conservation of the species (Palacín et al. Reference Palacín, Alonso, Martín and Alonso2012).

In conclusion, it is urgent to reinforce conservation actions worldwide to stop the alarming negative demographic trends and ensure the survival of the species. Such actions should include burying the most dangerous powerlines, implementing agri-environmental programs to improve habitat quality, and enforcing surveillance to prevent poaching in some Asian regions. The two latter measures should be carried out involving farmers and local people in general, who should be educated to understand the benefits of conservation, and compensated through social improvements in their rural communities (e.g. in education, transportation, infrastructures, etc.). The success in Austria and Germany after adopting strict conservation measures to protect Great Bustard habitat shows that the recovery of even the most endangered populations is possible. In the meantime, if current trends continue or get worse, the IUCN should check whether Red List criteria are met to consider upgrading the species’ conservation category from globally ‘Vulnerable’ to ‘Endangered’. Moreover, since the two subspecies, O. t. tarda and O. t. dybowskii, are geographically separated, subject to similar threats but with different intensities, and show quite different population sizes, they should perhaps be treated as separate conservation units.

Supplementary Materials

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://doi.org/10.1017/S095927092200003X.

Acknowledgements

We thank all authors listed in Table 1 for the surveys carried out in their countries, and particularly Y. Andryunschenko, A. Barati, H. Böing, C. Carrapato, J. C. del Moral, M. Karatas, T. Langgemach, L. Miklós, B. Molina, Y. Perlman, R. Raab and J. Silva for their unpublished data.

References

Alonso, J. C. (2014) The Great Bustard: Past, present and future of a globally threatened species. Ornis Hungarica 22: 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso, J. C. and Alonso, J. A. (1996) The Great Bustard Otis tarda in Spain: present status, recent trends and evaluation of earlier censuses. Biol. Conserv. 77: 7986.Google Scholar
Alonso, J. C. and Palacín, C. (2010) The world status and population trends of the Great Bustard (Otis tarda): 2010 update. Chinese Birds 1: 141147.Google Scholar
Alonso, J. C., Martín, C. A., Alonso, J. A., Lieckfeldt, D., Magaña, M., Palacín, C. and Pitra, C. (2009) Genetic diversity of the great bustard in Iberia and Morocco: risks from current population fragmentation. Conserv. Genet. 10: 379390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso, J. C., Palacín, C. and Martín, C. A. (2003) Status and recent trends of the Great Bustard (Otis tarda) population in the Iberian Peninsula. Biol. Conserv. 110: 185195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso, J. C., Palacín, C. and Martín, C. A. (2005) La Avutarda Común en la Península Ibérica. Población actual y método de censo. Madrid: SEO/BirdLife.Google Scholar
Alonso, J. C, Palacín, C. and Onrubia, A. (2019) Results of the Great Bustard (Otis tarda) census in Morocco, March 2020. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC) - Nature Solutions, Maroc. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
Andryuschenko, Y. (2013) Reporting Format for the Great Bustard MoU and Action Plan. Unpublished report. Melitopol, Ukraine: Azov-Black Sea Ornithological Station, Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology of National Academy of Sciences of the Ukraine and Melitopol State Teacher Training University.Google Scholar
Barati, A., Abdulkarimi, R. and Alonso, J. C. (2015) Recent status and population decline of the Great Bustard Otis tarda in Iran. Bird Conserv. Internatn. 25: 377384.Google Scholar
Barrientos, R., Ponce, C., Palacín, C., Martín, C. A., Martín, B. and Alonso, J. C. (2012) Wire marking results in a small but significant reduction in avian mortality, a BACI designed study. PLoS One 7: e32569Google Scholar
BirdLife International (2017Otis tarda. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T22691900A119044104. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN. UK.2017-3.RLTS.T22691900A119044104.en. [accessed 30 September 2021].Google Scholar
BirdLife International (2018) State of the world’s birds: taking the pulse of the 766 planet. Cambridge: BirdLife International.Google Scholar
BOU (British Ornithologists’ Union) (2017) The British List: a checklist of birds of Britain (9th edn). Ibis 160: 190240.Google Scholar
Collar, N. J., Baral, H. S., Batbayar, N., Bhardwaj, G. S., Brahma, N., Burnside, R. J., Choudhury, A. U., Combreau, O., Dolman, P. M., Donald, P. F., Dutta, S., Gadhavi, D., Gore, K., Goroshko, O. A., Hong, C., Jathar, G. A., Jha, R. R. S., Jhala, Y. V., Koshkin, M. A., Lahkar, B. P., Liu, G., Mahood, S. P., Morales, M. B., Narwade, S. S., Natsagdorj, T., Nefedov, A. A., Silva, J. P., Thakuri, J. J., Wang, M., Zhang, Y. and Kessler, A. E. (2017) Averting the extinction of bustards in Asia. Forktail 33: 126.Google Scholar
Faragó, S., Spakovszky, P. and Raab, R. (2014) Conservation of Great Bustard (Otis tarda) population of the Mosoni-Plain – A success story. Ornis Hungarica 22: 1431.Google Scholar
Hórreo, J. L., Alonso, J. C., Palacín, C. and Milá, B. (2014) Genetic structure in Iberian and Moroccan populations of the globally threatened great bustard (Otis tarda): a microsatellite perspective. J. Avian Biol. 45: 507513.Google Scholar
Hrabkovsky, B. (2018) Contribution to population status of Great Bustard (Otis tarda) in Slovakia. Report of Signatories. Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals. Fourth Meeting of the Signatories of the Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation and Management of the Middle-European Population of the Great Bustard (Otis tarda) Bad Belzig, Germany, 14 – 15 March 2018. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
ICNF (Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas) and LPN (Liga para a Protecção da Natureza) (2021) Censo de Abetarda (Otis tarda), em Portugal. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
Kessler, A. E. (2015) Asian Great Bustards: from conservation biology to sustainable grassland development. PhD thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.Google Scholar
Kessler, A. E. and Smith, A. T. (2014) The status of the Great Bustard (Otis tarda tarda) in Central Asia: from the Caspian Sea to the Altai. Aquila 121: 115132.Google Scholar
LIFE Great Bustard (2021) Results of the “2nd Synchronous Winter Count of the Great Bustard in Central Europe on the 17th & 18th of January 2021” within the LIFE project “Great Bustard” (extended period 11th – 24th of January 2021). Efforts to protect the great bustard are showing success throughout Central Europe. Cross-border protection of the Great Bustard in Central Europe" (LIFE15 NAT/AT/000834). Unpublished report.Google Scholar
Liu, G., Hu, X., Shafer, A. B. A., Gong, M., Han, M., Yu, C., Zhou, J., Bai, J., Meng, D., Yu, G. and Dang, D. (2017) Genetic structure and population history of wintering Asian Great Bustard (Otis tarda dybowskii) in China: implications for conservation. J. Ornithol. 158: 761772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, T. E., Guerin, R., Fages, F., Martineau, A. and Hingrat, Y. (2018) Breeding populations of Great Bustard and Little Bustard in South Kazakhstan province, Republic of Kazakhstan. Sandgrouse 40: 138143.Google Scholar
Mi, C., Falk, H. and Guo, Y. (2016) Climate change enlarges China’s Great Bustards’ suitable wintering distribution in the 21st century. Peer J. 4: e1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischenko, A. L., Belik, V. P., Borodin, O. V., Sarychev, V. S., Sukhanova, O. V., Krasnov, Yu. V., Preobrazhenskaya, E. S., Malovichko, L.V., Shepel, A. I., Yakovleva, M. V., Morozov, V. V., Volkov, S. V., Sharikov, A. V., Grishanov, G. V., Rykova, S. Yu., Yakovlev, V. A., Yakovlev, A. A., Spiridonov, S.N., Lapshin, A. S., Rakhimov, I. I., Moskvichev, A. N., Karyakin, I. V., Piskunov, V. V., Antonchikov, A. N., Muraviev, I. V., Korkina, S. A., Frolov, V. V. (2017) Estimation of numbers and trends for birds of the European Russia (“European Red List of Birds”). Russian Society for Bird Conservation and Study (BirdsRussia). Moscow. https://birdsrussia.ru/upload/iblock/b32/b328cc998d569db544f9018beb0d53d0.pdf.Google Scholar
Mityaev, I. D. and Yashchenko, R. V. (2006) [‘Great Bustard.’] In: Red Book of Kazakhstan. Almaty: Government of Kazakhstan. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Morales, M. B. and Bretagnolle, V. (2021) An update on the conservation status of the little bustard (Tetrax tetrax): global and local population estimates, trends and threats. Bird Conserv. Internatn. doi:10.1017/S0959270921000423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özgencil, I. K., Akarsu, F., Karatas, M. M., Gürsoy-Ergen, A., Saygili-Yigit, F., Karakaya, M. and Soyluer, M. (2021) Current status of Great Bustard Otis tarda in Turkey: population size, distribution, movements, and threats. Bird Conserv. Internatn., First View, 113. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270921000289Google Scholar
Palacín, C. and Alonso, J. C. (2008) An updated estimate of the world status and population trends of the Great Bustard Otis tarda. Ardeola 55: 1325.Google Scholar
Palacín, C. and Alonso, J. C. (2018) Failure of EU biodiversity strategy in Mediterranean farmland protected areas. J. Nature Conserv. 42: 6266.Google Scholar
Palacín, C. and Alonso, J. C. (2021) Avutarda euroasiática Otis tarda. Pp. 754758 in López-Jiménez, N., ed. Libro Rojo de las aves de España. Madrid: SEO/BirdLife. https://seo.org/libro-rojo-2021/Google Scholar
Palacín, C., Alonso, J. C., Martín, C. A. and Alonso, J. A. (2012). The importance of traditional farmland areas for steppe birds: A case study of migrant female great bustards Otis tarda in Spain. Ibis 154: 8595.Google Scholar
Palacín, C., Alonso, J. C., Martín, C. A., and Alonso, J. A. (2017). Changes in bird-migration patterns associated with human-induced mortality. Conserv. Biol. 31: 106115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palacín, C., Martín, B., Onrubia, A. and Alonso, J. C. (2016) Assessing the extinction risk of the great bustard Otis tarda in Africa. Endanger. Species Res. 30: 7382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qninba, A., El Khamlichi, R., Cherkaoui, I., Jabran, M., Noaman, M., Alazouer, Z., Zemrani, M., Lakhdar, M., Adrafin, M. and Bouamama, M. (2019) Recensement de la grande outarde campagne 2019. Compte rendu préliminaire de mission. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
Raab, R., Schutz, C., Spakovszky, P., Julius, E. and Schulze, H. (2012) Underground cabling and marking of power lines: conservation measures rapidly reduced mortality of West-Pannonian Great Bustards Otis tarda. Bird Conserv. Internatn. 22: 299306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibly, R. M. and Hone, J. (2002) Population growth rate and its determinants: an overview. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357: 11531170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanbury, A., Eaton, M., Aebischer, N., Balmer, D., Brown, A., Douse, A., Lindley, P., McCulloch, N., Noble, D. and Win, I. (2021) The status of our bird populations: the fifth Birds of Conservation Concern in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man and second IUCN Red List assessment of extinction risk for Great Britain. British Birds 114: 723747.Google Scholar
Vadász, C. and Lóránt, M. (2015) Key mortality causes of the Great Bustard (Otis tarda) in Central Hungary: An analysis of known fatalities. Ornis Hungarica 22: 3241.Google Scholar
Wang, M., González, M. A., Yang, W., Neuhaus, P., Blanco-Fontao, B. and Ruckstuhl, K. E. (2018) The probable strong decline of the Great Bustard Otis tarda tarda population in North-Western China. Ardeola 65: 291297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, D. (2018) The UK Great Bustard Reintroduction 2004-2017. Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals. Fourth Meeting of the Signatories of the Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation and Management of the Middle-European Population of the Great Bustard (Otis tarda) Bad Belzig, Germany, 14 – 15 March 2018.Google Scholar
Wiltshire Wildlife (2021) The return of the Great Bustards. https://www.wiltshirewildlife.org/blog/ the-return-of-the-great-bustards. [accessed 06 October 2021].Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Recent changes in Great Bustard numbers in countries with extant breeding populations, ordered by numbers of birds in 2005.

Supplementary material: File

Alonso and Palacín supplementary material

Alonso and Palacín supplementary material

Download Alonso and Palacín supplementary material(File)
File 18.9 KB