Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:30:00.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reduced glycaemic and insulinaemic responses following trehalose ingestion: implications for postprandial substrate use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2009

Judith G. P. van Can*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Biology, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
T. Herman IJzerman
Affiliation:
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Luc J. C. van Loon
Affiliation:
Department of Human Biology, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands Department of Human Movement Sciences, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Fred Brouns
Affiliation:
Department of Human Biology, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands Cargill R&D Centre, Vilvoorde, Belgium
Ellen E. Blaak
Affiliation:
Department of Human Biology, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author: Judith van Can, fax +31 43 3670976, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The proposed impact of slowly digestible sources of dietary carbohydrate in reducing the risk of developing obesity and related metabolic disorders remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to compare the postprandial metabolic response to the ingestion of glucose v. trehalose. We hypothesised that the reduced digestion and absorption rate of trehalose is accompanied by an attenuated glycaemic and insulinaemic response, leading to a less inhibited postprandial fat oxidation rate. In a randomised, single-blind, cross-over study, ten overweight subjects ingested two carbohydrate drinks (75 g carbohydrate equivalents of trehalose or glucose) following an overnight fast (08.40 hours) and together with a standardised mixed meal (12.30 hours; 25 % total energy content was provided as either glucose or trehalose). Blood samples were collected before ingestion and every 30 min thereafter for a period of 3 h; substrate use was assessed by indirect calorimetry and expired breath samples were collected. Ingestion of carbohydrates with a mixed meal resulted in a lower peak glucose response and a lower change in area under the curve (ΔAUC) following trehalose when compared with glucose. Differences in peak insulin response and ΔAUC were observed with trehalose when compared with glucose during the morning and afternoon. These differences were accompanied with a reduced carbohydrate oxidation after trehalose when ingested as a drink, whilst no significant differences in fat oxidation between drink were observed.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

Over the last two decades the prevalence of obesity and obesity-related disorders has increased rapidly(Reference Seidell1). Both genetic and environmental factors (physical activity and diet) play an important role in the aetiology of these chronic metabolic diseases. Obesity develops as a result of an imbalance between energy intake and energy expenditure, resulting in a positive energy balance. Although many factors promote a positive energy balance, there is sound evidence that a high-fat–low-carbohydrate (CHO) diet may increase the risk for weight gain largely because of excess energy intake(Reference Saris2). On the other hand, high CHO–low-fat diets contain a large amount of rapidly available CHO (cooked starches) and added refined sugars (sucrose, high-fructose maize syrup) which may be counterproductive to body-weight control and glycaemic control. This is because rapidly available CHO and refined sugars markedly increase postprandial glycaemia and insulinaemia, thereby inhibiting adipose tissue lipolysis and/or muscle fat oxidation and, as such may promote fat storage in both adipose and non-adipose tissue. Greater postprandial fat storage in non-adipose tissue, such as skeletal muscle and liver tissue, has been associated with the development of insulin resistance, whilst postprandial hyperglycaemia per se is a strong risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular co-morbidities(Reference Blaak, Hul and Verdich3, Reference Blaak4). Finally, hyperinsulinaemia might affect TAG clearance and liver TAG production, thereby increasing plasma TAG concentrations. Therefore, the recommendation to ingest a CHO-rich diet, containing a large amount of high-glycaemic CHO may actually have a less favourable effect on the blood lipid profile(Reference Sparks and Sparks5, Reference Chong, Fielding and Frayn6).

Potential negative side effects of high-CHO diets may be counteracted by the use of low-glycaemic-index foods. The prolonged use of low-glycaemic-index foods has been reported to prevent the risk profile for developing obesity, diabetes and CVD(Reference Brand-Miller, Holt, Pawlak and McMillan7). Brand-Miller et al. hypothesised that the ingestion of slowly digestible CHO attenuates postprandial glycaemia, reduces insulinaemia and enhances fat oxidation, all of which may assist to prevent body-weight gain and insulin resistance(Reference Brand-Miller, Holt, Pawlak and McMillan7). The latter may be of relevance in dietary strategies to modulate body weight and improve insulin sensitivity.

The present study compares the postprandial metabolic response following the ingestion of glucose compared with trehalose. We hypothesised that the ingestion of trehalose would be accompanied by an attenuated glycaemic and/or insulinaemic response, a reduced inhibition of postprandial fat oxidation rate, and a lower plasma TAG concentration when compared with glucose ingestion.

Methods

Subjects

Ten healthy, overweight men (n 8) and women (n 2) were recruited to participate in the study (age 31 (se 4) years, BMI 27·7 (se 0·8) kg/m2, fasting glucose 5·1 (se 0·1) mmol/l, fasting insulin 14 (se 1·9) μU/ml). Subjects with cardiovascular or metabolic disorders, and those using medication, were excluded from the study. The study was reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Maastricht University. All subjects provided written informed consent.

Study design

All subjects were studied following an overnight fast at 08.00 hours on two occasions with an interval of at least 1 week. At the beginning of the experimental day, a Teflon cannula was inserted into an antecubital vein. Two different CHO drinks were ingested (glucose or trehalose), during two different trials, performed using a single-blind, randomised cross-over design. Glucose and trehalose were derived from maize, a natural CHO source with a high natural abundance of 13C. The CHO load consisted of 75 g CHO equivalents and was dissolved in 400 ml water, to assess the metabolic response. After baseline measurements all experimental beverages were consumed within 15 min. Blood samples were taken before the consumption of the drinks or meals (t = − 5 min) and at t = 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 min after ingestion to determine circulating metabolite and hormone concentrations. Energy expenditure and substrate use were measured, immediately before and for 3 h after CHO ingestion (08.40 hours), using a ventilated hood system. Expired breath samples were collected every 1 h to determine 13CO2 enrichment. These procedures were repeated on the same day before consuming a standardised lunch together with a beverage containing either glucose or trehalose and for 3 h after lunch (12.30 hours). Lunch had a total energy content equivalent to 50 % of calculated 24 h resting energy expenditure. Lunch macronutrient composition represented 55 % energy as CHO, 30 % energy as fat and 15 % energy as protein; 25 % energy of the total energy content of the meal was provided in the form of a beverage containing either trehalose or glucose. Lunch was consumed within 15 min.

Test products

Trehalose

Trehalose is a disaccharide of glucose with an α-1,1 glycoside linkage. It is a non-reducing sugar that is naturally present in honey, bread, mushrooms and fermented drinks. Trehalose is produced industrially by enzymic conversion using starch as the base material. Its sweetness is 40–45 % compared with that of sucrose. When ingested, trehalose is enzymically hydrolysed in the small intestine by trehalase into two d-glucose molecules, which are subsequently absorbed and metabolised(Reference Richards, Krakowka and Dexter8, Reference Dahlqvist9). It appears that ingestion, hydrolysis, absorption and metabolism of trehalose is essentially identical to all other digestible disaccharides(Reference Richards, Krakowka and Dexter8).

Exogenous carbohydrate oxidation

As indicated above, all CHO were derived from naturally 13C-enriched sources: glucose (13C enrichment = − 11·17 δ per mil v. Pee Dee belemnite (PDB) (δ‰)) and trehalose (13C enrichment = − 17·86 δ‰). The 13C enrichment of the experimental beverages was determined by elemental analyser isotope ratio MS (Carlo Erba-Finnigan MAT 252, Bremen, Germany). Subjects were instructed not to consume any food products with a high 13C natural abundance for at least 1 week before and during the experimental period. In European countries the consumption of native CHO sources with a high natural 13C abundance is low(Reference Wagenmakers, Rehrer and Brouns10).

Biochemical analyses

At all time points, 8 ml blood were collected in pre-chilled tubes with 200 μl 0·2 m-EDTA (Sigma, Poole, Dorset, UK). After collection, blood samples were centrifuged immediately at 4°C for 10 min at 1000 g and frozen at − 80°C until analysis. Plasma glucose concentrations were determined enzymically (ABX Diagnostics, Montpellier, France) as were NEFA concentrations (NEFA-NEFA C kit; Wako, Neuss, Germany) on a semi-automatic analyser (COBAS FARA; Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). Insulin was analysed by RIA (Human Insulin RIA Kit; LINCO Research Inc., St Charles, MO, USA). Breath samples were analysed for 13C:12C ratio by GC isotope ratio MS (Finnigan MAT 252).

Calculations

Metabolic rate was calculated from VO2 (litres/min) and VCO2 (litres/min) according to the equations of Frayn(Reference Frayn11). N excretion was calculated based on the assumption that protein oxidation represents 15 % of total energy expenditure. Energy expenditure was calculated using the formula of Weir(Reference Weir12):

The isotopic enrichment was expressed as the δ‰ difference between the 13C:12C ratio of the sample and a known laboratory reference standard according to the formula of Craig(Reference Craig13):

The δ13C was then related to the international standard Pee Dee belemnite (PDB).

Exogenous CHO oxidation was estimated using the following formula(Reference Pirnay, Crielaard and Pallikarakis14):

in which VCO2 is the volume of expired CO2 per min (litres/min), δExp is the 13C enrichment of expired air with CHO ingestion at different time-points, δIng is the enrichment of the CHO in the experimental beverages, δExpbkg is the 13C enrichment in expired breath before the intervention (background) and k is the amount of CO2 (in litres) produced by the oxidation of 1 g glucose (k = 0·7467 litres CO2 per g glucose). This represents a minimal estimate of exogenous CHO oxidation, as part of the 13C will be temporarily fixated in the bicarbonate pool and in the tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates(Reference Irving, Wong and Shulman15, Reference Leijssen and Elia16).

Statistics

A computerised statistics program, SPSS 11 for Macintosh (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), was used to perform all calculations. All data are expressed as means with their standard errors. The total response of metabolic parameters after CHO ingestion was expressed as the incremental area under the curve (minus baseline values, change in area under the curve (ΔAUC)) and calculated by the trapezoid method. Response is defined in the Results section as ΔAUC, unless mentioned otherwise. Differences between responses to glucose compared with trehalose were analysed by means of the Student's paired t test. The Student's paired t test was used to compare differences in peak response between the different CHO.

Results

Plasma glucose, insulin, non-esterified fatty acids and triacylglycerol

Fasting plasma glucose, insulin and NEFA concentrations did not differ between experiments (Fig. 1(a)–(c)). Peak plasma glucose concentrations were lower after the ingestion of trehalose when compared with glucose (Fig. 1(a)). The glycaemic response (ΔAUC) was comparable after the intake of trehalose compared with glucose following an overnight fast (P = 0·08), whilst there was a lower response after trehalose compared with glucose when ingested in combination with a mixed meal (P < 0·02; Table 1).

Fig. 1 Plasma glucose (a), insulin (b) and NEFA (c) concentrations following glucose (–●–) or trehalose (–○–) ingestion. Time-course of fat oxidation (d), carbohydrate (CHO) oxidation (e) and energy expenditure (f) following glucose or trehalose ingestion. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that following trehalose ingestion (P < 0·05).

Table 1 Overview of metabolic responses, expressed as change in area under the curve (ΔAUC), after ingestion of trehalose and glucose

Mean value was significantly different from that for trehalose: * P < 0·05, ** P < 0·01.

Peak insulin concentrations and the total response were lower after the ingestion of trehalose compared with glucose during the morning and afternoon (Fig. 1(b) and Table 1). During the morning, circulating NEFA concentrations following the ingestion of trehalose and glucose were equal, whilst there was a trend towards less suppression of NEFA with trehalose during the afternoon (P = 0·09) (Fig. 1(c) and Table 1). The intake of trehalose resulted in a lower increase in TAG concentrations compared with glucose during the morning (P < 0·02) and a higher increase during the afternoon (P < 0·05) (Table 1).

Thermogenesis and respiratory quotient

The thermogenic response (ΔAUC) following trehalose compared with glucose was comparable during the morning and afternoon. There was a tendency towards a lower increase of the respiratory quotient after the intake of trehalose compared with glucose during the morning (P = 0·09), but no significant differences were observed between trehalose and glucose during the afternoon (Table 1).

Total fat oxidation

There were differences in fat oxidation with ingestion of trehalose when compared with glucose during the morning (P = 0·1) and the afternoon, which were not significant (Fig. 1(d)).

Total carbohydrate oxidation

After intake of trehalose the increment in total CHO oxidation was lower as compared with glucose during the morning (P = 0·02). CHO oxidation rates were comparable during the afternoon (Fig. 1(e) and Table 1).

Exogenous carbohydrate oxidation

No differences were observed in the minimal estimates of exogenous CHO oxidation rates between experiments. The mean percentage of the enriched sugar recovered in breath carbon dioxide excretion averaged at least 7–10 % in all trials during the morning.

Discussion

The present study provides evidence that attenuated postprandial glycaemic and insulinaemic responses following trehalose ingestion shifts postprandial substrate use towards a lower CHO oxidation in overweight subjects after ingestion of a CHO drink but not when ingested as part of a mixed meal. No significant effects were observed on postprandial fat oxidation. The attenuated glycaemic and insulinaemic responses following trehalose are attributed to the slower rates at which trehalose is digested and/or absorbed. Several studies have shown that the absorption rate of trehalose is slower than glucose(Reference Dahlqvist and Thomson17). An attenuated rise in blood glucose and insulin levels after the intake of trehalose were observed in trained athletes and healthy subjects(Reference Livesey18, Reference Jentjens and Jeukendrup19). The present study is the first to show that trehalose ingestion attenuates the rise in plasma glucose and insulin levels in overweight subjects. Although there were no significant differences in the total integrated glycaemic responses following ingestion of different CHO after an overnight fast (morning), there was a clearly attenuated rise in peak plasma glucose concentration after the ingestion of trehalose compared with glucose. The differences in the duration of elevated glycaemia and the absence of a strong rebound effect may explain the lack of difference when considering the ΔAUC.

Substrate use

The postprandial hyperglycaemia with ingestion of glucose increases insulin secretion, and higher insulin levels would promote glucose uptake in insulin-sensitive tissues, such as the skeletal muscle, and inhibit adipose tissue lipolysis(Reference Wolever20). Through these mechanisms, interindividual differences in substrate use may play a role in the development of obesity and subsequently type 2 diabetes mellitus. Additionally, a shift towards a greater postprandial fat oxidation rate may attenuate lipid accumulation in non-adipose tissues leading to reduced insulin resistance(Reference Flatt21, Reference Eckel, Hernandez and Bell22). Lower glucose and insulin levels were observed after the ingestion of trehalose and no significant effects on postprandial fat oxidation were observed, whilst there was a slightly lower increase in CHO oxidation. Thus, the trehalose-induced lower glycaemic and insulinaemic response did not promote fat oxidation in the postprandial period.

Postprandial triacylglycerol concentration

Hyperinsulinaemia may be accompanied by a greater increase in plasma TAG concentrations, which are considered to be risk factors for the development of CVD(Reference Sparks and Sparks5). Low-glycaemic, low-insulinaemic CHO sources may be used to attenuate the postprandial rise in TAG concentrations, but there is no clear consensus. In the present study, we observed that trehalose resulted in reduced TAG concentrations during the morning, whilst during the afternoon postprandial TAG was slightly increased when compared with glucose.

In conclusion, ingestion of trehalose compared with glucose attenuates the postprandial glycaemic and insulinaemic responses. Attenuated blood glucose and insulin concentrations tended to shift postprandial substrate use towards a reduced CHO oxidation when trehalose was ingested during the morning, but had no significant effects on postprandial fat oxidation or postprandial NEFA concentrations.

Acknowledgements

The research was sponsored by Cargill Inc. (Minneapolis, MN, USA).

J. G. P. vC. wrote the manuscript; T. H. IJ. collected the data; L. J. C. vL. and F. B. read the manuscript and contributed to the discussion; E. E. B. supervised the project, read the manuscript and contributed to the discussion.

F. B. was an advisor to Cargill during the time of the present study.

None of the other authors had any financial or personal interest in any company or organisation sponsoring the research.

References

1Seidell, JC (2000) Obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes – a worldwide epidemic. Br J Nutr 83, Suppl. 1, S5S8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Saris, WH (2003) Glycemic carbohydrate and body weight regulation. Nutr Rev 61, S10S16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Blaak, EE, Hul, G, Verdich, C, et al. (2006) Fat oxidation before and after a high fat load in the obese insulin-resistant state. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91, 14621469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Blaak, EE (2004) Basic disturbances in skeletal muscle fatty acid metabolism in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Proc Nutr Soc 63, 323330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Sparks, JD & Sparks, CE (1994) Insulin regulation of triacylglycerol-rich lipoprotein synthesis and secretion. Biochim Biophys Acta 1215, 932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Chong, MF, Fielding, BA & Frayn, KN (2007) Mechanisms for the acute effect of fructose on postprandial lipemia. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 15111520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Brand-Miller, JC, Holt, SH, Pawlak, DB & McMillan, J (2002) Glycemic index and obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 281S285S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Richards, AB, Krakowka, S, Dexter, LB, et al. (2002) Trehalose: a review of properties, history of use and human tolerance, and results of multiple safety studies. Food Chem Toxicol 40, 871898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Dahlqvist, A (1962) Specificity of the human intestinal disaccharidases and implications for hereditary disaccharide intolerance. J Clin Invest 41, 463470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Wagenmakers, AJ, Rehrer, NJ, Brouns, F, et al. (1993) Breath 13CO2 background enrichment during exercise: diet-related differences between Europe and America. J Appl Physiol 74, 23532357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Frayn, KN (1983) Calculation of substrate oxidation rates in vivo from gaseous exchange. J Appl Physiol 55, 628634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Weir, JB (1949) New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J Physiol 109, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Craig, H (1957) Isotopic standards for carbon and oxygen and correction factors for mass-spectrometric analysis of carbon dioxide. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 12, 133149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Pirnay, F, Crielaard, JM, Pallikarakis, N, et al. (1982) Fate of exogenous glucose during exercise of different intensities in humans. J Appl Physiol 53, 16201624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Irving, CS, Wong, WW & Shulman, RJ (1983) [13C]Bicarbonate kinetics in humans: intra- vs. interindividual variations. Am J Physiol 245, R190R202.Google Scholar
16Leijssen, DP & Elia, M (1996) Recovery of 13CO2 and 14CO2 in human bicarbonate studies: a critical review with original data. Clin Sci (Lond) 91, 665677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Dahlqvist, A & Thomson, DL (1963) The digestion and absorption of maltose and trehalose by the intact rat. Acta Physiol Scand 59, 111125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Livesey, G (2001) Tolerance of low-digestible carbohydrates: a general view. Br J Nutr 85, Suppl. 1, S7S16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Jentjens, RL & Jeukendrup, AE (2003) Effects of pre-exercise ingestion of trehalose, galactose and glucose on subsequent metabolism and cycling performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 88, 459465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Wolever, TM (2003) Carbohydrate and the regulation of blood glucose and metabolism. Nutr Rev 61, S40S48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Flatt, JP (1996) Carbohydrate balance and body-weight regulation. Proc Nutr Soc 55, 449465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Eckel, RH, Hernandez, TL, Bell, ML, et al. (2006) Carbohydrate balance predicts weight and fat gain in adults. Am J Clin Nutr 83, 803808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Plasma glucose (a), insulin (b) and NEFA (c) concentrations following glucose (–●–) or trehalose (–○–) ingestion. Time-course of fat oxidation (d), carbohydrate (CHO) oxidation (e) and energy expenditure (f) following glucose or trehalose ingestion. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that following trehalose ingestion (P < 0·05).

Figure 1

Table 1 Overview of metabolic responses, expressed as change in area under the curve (ΔAUC), after ingestion of trehalose and glucose