Introduction
T-glottaling, the realization of the voiceless alveolar stop /t/ as a glottal stop [ʔ], is a prominent phenomenon in English that has attracted copious attention from laypeople (see Kirkham and Moore [Reference Kirkham and Moore2016] for some popular comments on Ed Miliband’s speech that were cited from political columns in the British press) and linguists alike. In the 21st century, T-glottaling has been documented for numerous speakers in urban centers all over the UK (e.g., Schleef, Reference Schleef2013 for London and Edinburgh; Straw & Patrick, Reference Straw and Patrick2007 for Ipswich; Drummond, Reference Drummond2011 for Manchester; Williams & Kerswill, Reference Williams, Kerswill, Foulkes and Docherty1999 for Reading and Milton Keynes; Stuart-Smith, Timmins, & Tweedie, Reference Stuart-Smith, Timmins and Tweedie2007 for Glasgow; Mees & Collins, Reference Mees, Collins, Foulkes and Docherty1999 for Cardiff), in Received Pronunciation (RP; e.g., Fabricius, Reference Fabricius2002), as well as globally (Holmes, Reference Holmes1995 for New Zealand English; Roberts, Reference Roberts2006 for Vermont English; Eddington & Taylor, Reference Eddington and Taylor2009 for American English; Gut, Reference Gut, Deterding, Brown and Low2005 for Singapore English). In Britain, this sound change has become so pervasive that it has been termed “a stereotype of British speech” by Smith and Holmes-Elliott (Reference Smith and Holmes-Elliott2017:324), with Trudgill (Reference Trudgill, Foulkes and Docherty1999:136) calling this phenomenon “one of the most dramatic, widespread and rapid changes to have occurred in British English in recent times.”
The present study sets out to investigate the current status of T-glottaling in Scottish Standard English (SSE), a standardized variety of Scottish English typically spoken by educated middle-class speakers in Scotland (Stuart-Smith, Reference Stuart-Smith, Kortmann and Upton2008:48). SSE developed in the Scottish Lowlands from the 17th century onwards when it was adopted by the upper classes and a diglossic situation with Scots emerged (Maguire, Reference Maguire and Hickey2012). This diglossic situation is traditionally described as a bipolar continuum ranging from Scots to SSE (Aitken, Reference Aitken and Trudgill1984:520; Johnston, Reference Johnston and Britain2007; Stuart-Smith, Reference Stuart-Smith, Kortmann and Upton2008) with the term “Scottish English” used to encompass all of the varieties on this continuum, while more recent descriptions also consider the influence from Standard Southern British English (SSBE; Schützler, Reference Schützler and Lawson2014) on Scottish English. The complex linguistic situation in Scotland has given rise to the sociolinguistic uniqueness of SSE, which is on the one hand a localized and geographically grounded norm conditioned by a number of varieties of Scots and a standardized middle-class norm affected by SSBE and RP on the other. Although T-glottaling has been widely attested in varieties of English and various patterns and influencing factors thereof have been identified, little empirical evidence exists on this sound change in supraregional SSE. The current study aims to explore how this sound change correlates with both language-internal and language-external constraints. Furthermore, by comparing patterns of T-glottaling in SSE with RP, Scottish Englishes, and other English varieties, this study hopes to contribute to our understanding of the complexity of sound variation and change. Specifically, the following research questions will be addressed:
(1) How is T-glottaling distributed in supraregional SSE?
(2) Which language-internal and language-external factors condition patterns of T-glottaling in SSE?
(3) Do patterns of and underlying factors affecting T-glottaling in SSE differ from other varieties of English (especially RP and other Scottish Englishes)?
T-glottaling as a sociolinguistic phenomenon: Patterns and constraints
Although its origin is still debated, T-glottaling appears to constitute a polygenetic phenomenon that has spread from both Glasgow (Macafee, Reference Macafee and Jones1997:528) and lower-class London speech (see also Smith & Holmes-Elliott, Reference Smith and Holmes-Elliott2017:324) to many accents all over Britain and worldwide. A number of studies have shown this phonological process to be diffusing and developing rapidly in various directions: from lower-class to middle-class and younger to older speakers as well as from informal to formal speech. For example, there is a marked increase of T-glottaling especially among younger speakers (e.g., Marshall, Reference Marshall2001; Smith & Holmes-Elliott, Reference Smith and Holmes-Elliott2017; Tollfree, Reference Tollfree, Foulkes and Docherty1999), who appear to perceive glottal variants of /t/ as more friendly, whereas they consider the alveolar variants as more articulate, reliable, and posh (Schleef, Reference Schleef2013). Moreover, T-glottaling is now also increasingly used in standard accents and varieties (see Badia Barrera, Reference Badia Barrera2015 and Fabricius, Reference Fabricius2002 for RP; Miller, Reference Miller2019 for SSE) and in formal styles (see Milroy, Milroy, Hartley, & Walshaw, Reference Milroy, Milroy, Hartley and Walshaw1994 for 10-year-old girls in Tyneside).
Wells (Reference Wells, Medina Casado and Soto Palomo1997) described three types of T-glottaling that differ in the phonetic environment in which they occur:
(1) Type 1: The realization of /t/ as a glottal stop before a following obstruent or sonorant consonant both word-medially, as in Scot[ʔ]land, and across word boundaries, as in not[ʔ] now.
(2) Type 2: The realization of /t/ as a glottal stop in word-final position before a vowel, as in not[ʔ] only, or a pause, as in not[ʔ]#.
(3) Type 3: The realization of /t/ as a glottal stop in word-medial intervocalic position, as in butt[ʔ]er, and before a syllabic /l/, as in bott[ʔ]le.
Wells (Reference Wells, Medina Casado and Soto Palomo1997) furthermore stated a chronological relationship between these three types of T-glottaling in RP: the first type of T-glottaling appeared in the mid-20th century, while the second type was introduced by younger speakers from the late 20th century onwards. In contrast, T-glottaling in word-medial intervocalic position and before a syllabic consonant (Type 3) is not used by RP speakers at all, as it is stigmatized and associated with lower-class speech. Wells’ impressionistic description is corroborated by an empirical study by Badia Barrera (Reference Badia Barrera2015), who analyzed young RP speakers and showed that T-glottaling of the first type occurs almost categorically in their informal speaking style. T-glottaling of Type 2 is produced variably, while the realization of /t/ as a glottal stop in word-medial intervocalic position and before a syllabic /l/ is still very rare. Whether these different rates of T-glottaling for the three “Wells’ types” that exist in RP can also be found in the standard variety spoken in Scotland has not been investigated yet and will be the focus of this study.
Like for RP, different rates of T-glottaling for the three types described by Wells are also found in other varieties of British English: Straw and Patrick (Reference Straw and Patrick2007:391) showed in their overview that the realization of /t/ as a glottal stop before a following obstruent or sonorant consonant (Type 1) was almost categorical in a wide range of British accents, whereas the realization of /t/ as a glottal stop before a vowel or a pause (Type 2) was not present to the same extent in the speech of all speakers. It varied with the social factors of age, gender, and class, such that it was used more frequently by younger than by older speakers (e.g., Docherty & Foulkes, Reference Docherty, Foulkes, Foulkes and Docherty1999 for Derby) and prevocalically more by lower-class than by middle-class boys and girls in Reading, Hull, and Milton Keynes (Williams & Kerswill, Reference Williams, Kerswill, Foulkes and Docherty1999). T-glottaling in word-medial intervocalic position (Type 3) was not included in Straw and Patrick’s (Reference Straw and Patrick2007) overview, but Marshall (Reference Marshall2001) found systematic variation of its frequency with age and gender for speakers in the North-East of Scotland: it was predominately used by both male and female teenagers as well as by male 8–12-year olds but not by older speakers or by female 8–12-year olds. The social variation of T-glottaling of the Types 2 and 3 thus suggests that these processes reflect ongoing language change, which might spread further. Whether these results can be interpreted as an implicatory relationship between the three types of T-glottaling—that is, whether T-glottaling spreads in a variety of English in the order Type 1 > Type 2 > Type 3—is still an open question, which we will test in this study.
Besides the following phonetic environment as described in the three types by Wells (Reference Wells, Medina Casado and Soto Palomo1997), other linguistic factors been found to affect the rate of T-glottaling, outlined below.
(1) The preceding phonetic environment, where vowels trigger T-glottaling most (see Roberts, Reference Roberts2006 for Vermont speakers; Schleef, Reference Schleef2013 for young speakers in London and Edinburgh).
(2) The position of /t/, with word-final /t/ showing more glottaling than word-medial /t/ (e.g., Kirkham & Moore Reference Kirkham and Moore2016 in a case study of the politician Ed Miliband’s speech; Schleef, Reference Schleef2013).
(3) Word frequency and word type, with frequent words and function words favoring T-glottaling (e.g., Badia Barrera, Reference Badia Barrera2015 for young RP speakers; Schleef, Reference Schleef2013).
Moreover, different speaking styles exhibit different degrees of T-glottaling in that informal conversations show a higher frequency of its occurrence than reading passages (Badia Barrera, Reference Badia Barrera2015; Schleef, Reference Schleef2013; see also Stuart-Smith et al., Reference Stuart-Smith, Timmins and Tweedie2007 for Glasgow English), an effect that is especially strong for /t/ in word-medial position (e.g., Schleef, Reference Schleef2013). However, most studies carried out so far, with the exception of Schleef (Reference Schleef2013) and Badia Barrera (Reference Badia Barrera2015), only include a small number of linguistic factors and typically do not consider all types of T-glottaling so that the relative influence of these linguistic factors on the rate of T-glottaling is still largely unknown.
Previous studies on T-glottaling in Scottish Englishes
Although T-glottaling in Scotland appears well researched in terms of its diachronic spread and social distribution, extant studies on contemporary Scottish English have certain limitations (see Table 1 for an overview of recent studies). First, they are mostly restricted to speakers in Glasgow (e.g., Stuart-Smith, Reference Stuart-Smith1999; Stuart-Smith et al., Reference Stuart-Smith, Timmins and Tweedie2007) and rural communities in the Northeast of Scotland (e.g., Marshall, Reference Marshall2001; Smith & Holmes-Elliott, Reference Smith and Holmes-Elliott2017). Second, most of the studies are based on small samples of socially stratified speakers and differ sharply in the types of T-glottaling they analyze, ranging from intervocalic word-medial /t/ only (Type 3) (Marshall, Reference Marshall2001), word-final /t/ only (Hall-Lew, Markl, Papineau, & Sung, Reference Hall-Lew, Markl, Papineau and Sung2019) to Types 2 and 3 only (Stuart-Smith, Reference Stuart-Smith1999), but excluding some phonetic and prosodic environments. Also, studies differ sharply in the number of linguistic and social factors they investigate that potentially impact the occurrence of T-glottaling.
Table 1. Empirical studies of T-glottaling in Scottish English, their research foci, data, and analyses
As a result, our knowledge of T-glottaling in Scottish Englishes is still partly patchy and sometimes contradictory. The factors social class and age have been established as influencing the rate of T-glottaling in various forms of Scottish English: Glaswegian working-class speakers show a considerably higher rate of T-glottaling than middle-class speakers (Stuart-Smith, Reference Stuart-Smith1999; Stuart-Smith et al., Reference Stuart-Smith, Timmins and Tweedie2007) and younger speakers produce more T-glottaling than older speakers (for Glasgow, see Stuart-Smith, Reference Stuart-Smith1999; Stuart-Smith et al., Reference Stuart-Smith, Timmins and Tweedie2007; for the Buckie dialect, see Smith & Holmes-Elliot, Reference Smith and Holmes-Elliott2017; for intervocalic /t/ in the Huntly dialect, see Marshall, Reference Marshall2001), but no findings exist yet for speakers of the Scottish standard variety SSE. Furthermore, gender has not been found to play a role for either Glaswegian speakers (Stuart-Smith, Reference Stuart-Smith1999; Stuart-Smith et al., Reference Stuart-Smith, Timmins and Tweedie2007) or Edinburgh teenagers (Schleef, Reference Schleef2013) but does influence the rate of T-glottaling for older speakers of the Buckie dialect (Smith & Holmes-Elliot, Reference Smith and Holmes-Elliott2017) as well as in the Huntly dialect (Marshall, Reference Marshall2001).
As far as language-internal factors are concerned, the following phonetic environment favoring T-glottaling has been variously identified as consonant (C) > vowel (V) > pause (P) (Hall-Lew et al., Reference Hall-Lew, Markl, Papineau and Sung2019 but with regional variation), C > P > V (Schleef, Reference Schleef2013 for word-final /t/; no influence for word-medial /t/), and P > V (Stuart-Smith, Reference Stuart-Smith1999 with variation with age and gender). For the Buckie dialect, a completely different hierarchy was found with highest rates of medial T-glottaling followed by a syllabic /l/ (bottle), word-final /t/ before vowels Coda#Vowel (that is), and intervocalic /t/ (pretty), contexts that are highly disfavored in other varieties of Scottish English (Smith & Holmes-Elliott, Reference Smith and Holmes-Elliott2017). In general, speaking style has been found to influence the rate of T-glottaling in Scottish English, which is more frequent in conversations than in word list readings (Schleef, Reference Schleef2013; Stuart-Smith, Reference Stuart-Smith1999; Stuart-Smith et al., Reference Stuart-Smith, Timmins and Tweedie2007), but young working-class speakers in Glasgow (Stuart-Smith et al., Reference Stuart-Smith, Timmins and Tweedie2007) and Edinburgh teenagers (Schleef, Reference Schleef2013) also produce high rates of T-glottaling in reading. The influence of preceding phonetic environment and word class has only been analyzed for Edinburgh teenagers so far (Schleef, Reference Schleef2013) and awaits confirmation for other speakers across Scotland.
It is worth noting that none of the previous studies analyzed all three types of T-glottaling described by Wells (Reference Wells, Medina Casado and Soto Palomo1997). Therefore, the question of whether these three types occur at different rates in Scottish English, as they do in RP, is still open. However, Stuart-Smith’s (Reference Stuart-Smith1999) study of Glaswegian speakers showed that middle-class speakers produced more T-glottaling of Type 2 than of Type 3 (only intervocalic position was included), with overall higher rates for younger than older speakers. Thus, while for older middle-class speakers, /t/ in intervocalic position was still the norm in the late 1990s, for younger middle-class speakers, a glottal stop in this position had become an option with an occurrence of about 35% in conversational speaking style. It would, therefore, be interesting to explore whether this rate has increased in the past decades and whether T-glottaling of Type 3 has diffused to more formal speech styles in Scotland.
The present study investigates patterns of T-glottaling in SSE, which will be operationalized in this study as the speech that is produced by Scottish speakers in formal situations such as when giving a speech in parliament. Given the uniqueness of SSE as a variety that intersects both localized and standardized norms, the investigation of T-glottaling in SSE could not only contribute to our understanding of how this sound change is distributed in the specific variety but also shed light on the complex nature of sound variation and change more generally. Specifically, we will analyze the influence of the social factorsFootnote 1 age and gender as well as of the linguistic factors following and preceding phonetic context, word type, and speaking style on the rate of T-glottaling. Finally, we will interpret the results with a view of testing the hypothesis that the three types of T-glottaling are developing in the order Type 1 > Type 2 > Type 3 in SSE as proposed by Wells (Reference Wells, Medina Casado and Soto Palomo1997) for RP and compare the diffusion patterns and underlying constraints of T-glottaling in SSE with RP and other Scottish English varieties to gain a more accurate insight into the status of SSE.
Methods
The data analyzed in the present study were drawn from the Scottish component of the International Corpus of English (ICE-Scotland; Schützler, Gut, & Fuchs Reference Schützler, Gut, Fuchs, Hancil and Beal2017), which contains both written (400,000 words collected from 17 written text types) and spoken data (600,000 words from 15 spoken genres), with the latter having time-aligned phonemically annotated transcriptions. Eight types of formal speeches that are assumed to specifically invoke the use of SSE were selected: broadcast discussions, broadcast interviews, broadcast news, broadcast talks, demonstrations, legal presentations, parliamentary debates, and unscripted speeches. These include both scripted (e.g., broadcast news) and unscripted (e.g., broadcast discussions) types of speech and comprise a total of 172,328 words. There is a total of 136 speakers included in the corpus (55 women, 81 men), aged between 17 and 78, who have various professional backgrounds and come from all over Scotland.
The realization of each /t/ token was analyzed auditorily by two independent coders using Praat (Boersma, Reference Boersma2001), which follows the methodology of the majority of studies on T-glottaling in Scottish English (e.g., Macaulay, Reference Macaulay1977; Schleef, Reference Schleef2013; Stuart-Smith, Reference Stuart-Smith1999). We excluded minority variants of /t/ such as taps [ɾ] and the glottalized voiceless alveolar stop [ʔt] and concentrated on the binary distinction between [t] and [ʔ] (see also Drummond, Reference Drummond2011; Fabricius, Reference Fabricius2002; Schleef, Reference Schleef2013; Smith & Holmes-Elliott, Reference Smith and Holmes-Elliott2017; Straw & Patrick, Reference Straw and Patrick2007), with [ʔ] possibly including other articulations such as creaky voice that give the auditory impression of a glottal stop. Both word-medial and word-final /t/ were analyzed, but words with /t/ in the following environments were excluded (see Schleef, Reference Schleef2013):
(1) when /t/ occurs in coda consonant clusters such as in mint and thirst;
(2) word-final /t/ with a following /t/ or /d/ in the onset position of the following word (e.g., that day);
(3) word-medial /t/ for which the stress pattern normally blocks T-glottaling (i.e., when /t/ is the onset consonant of a stressed syllables as in tutorial).
For the function words with high frequency, only the first 10 occurrences were included for each speaker (see also Schleef, Reference Schleef2013). This generated a total of 12,162 analyzed tokens of /t/ with 7,125 of them in the word-final position and 5,037 in the word-medial position. Each token was further coded for both language-internal and -external factors, with the distributions shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Overview of predictors and distribution of /t/ tokens
Note on speech style categories: bnew = broadcast news; btal = broadcast talks; leg = legal presentations; nbtal = non-broadcast talks; parl = parliamentary debates.
For the statistical analysis, mixed-effects logistic regression models with the presence or absence of T-glottaling as dependent variable and speaker and word as random intercepts were fitted using the package lme4 (Bates, Maechler, Bolker, & Walker, Reference Bates, Maechler, Bolker and Walker2014) in R (version 4.2.1; R Core Team, 2018). Fixed predictors include the internal factors following context, preceding context, type, and word type, as well as the external factors gender, age, and speech style. The best models were selected using the anova() function. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni corrections were conducted in the lsmeans package (Lenth, Reference Lenth2016) and its successor, the emmeans package (Lenth, Reference Lenth2018).
Results
Descriptive statistics
An overview of the realization of /t/ according to its position across all speakers is shown in Table 3. Overall, 27.8% of the analyzed tokens were realized as [ʔ]. T-glottaling is more likely to occur in word-final position (38.8%) than in word-medial position (12.3%).
Table 3. Overall distribution of [t] and [ʔ] for /t/
Zooming into the relative distribution of /t/ by different following phonetic contexts, Figures 1 and 2 illustrate that considerable differences in the rate of T-glottaling exist across the four following contexts. For word-final /t/, more than half of the tokens were produced as [ʔ] either when followed by a sonorant consonant (56.4%) or when followed by an obstruent (54.7%) (Type 1). Nearly a third of the instances of /t/ preceding a vowel were realized as a glottal stop (30.8%), while only 18.9% of the tokens with a following pause were produced as [ʔ].
Figure 1. Relative distribution of word-final /t/ by following contexts.
Regarding word-medial position, Figure 2 shows that T-glottaling occurs most frequently with a following sonorant consonant, with nearly half of the tokens (48.7%) realized as [ʔ], while 32.3% of the word-medial /t/ with a following obstruent was produced as [ʔ]. Following syllabic liquids and vowels, on the other hand, did not favor word-medial T-glottaling, with only 6.8% and 3.6% of the tokens in the respective context being realized as glottal stops.
Figure 2. Relative distribution of word-medial /t/ by following contexts.
Figures 1 and 2 indicate that, for both word-final and word-medial /t/, the use of a glottal stop is most likely to occur with a following sonorant consonant, with approximately half of the tokens being realized as [ʔ]. The second favorable context involves /t/ followed by an obstruent for both positions. Word-medial T-glottaling preceding a syllabic liquid or a vowel, on the other hand, was found to be extremely rare.
Multivariate analysis of word-final and word-medial T-glottaling
As different patterns of T-glottaling were found for word-final and word-medial positions, separate statistical models were fitted for them to investigate underlying internal and external factors affecting their respective distribution (see Schleef, Reference Schleef2013). Table 4 shows the best-fit mixed-effects logistic regression model for the realization of word-final /t/. following context, word type, age, and speech style were found to be statistically significant in conditioning word-final T-glottaling. Specifically, the realization of word-final /t/ is conditioned by word type (p < .001), with function words favoring T-glottaling more than content words. The following phonetic contexts that word-final /t/ occurs in also play a statistically significant role, showing the hierarchy of sonorant consonant (p < .001) > obstruent > vowel (p < .001) > pause (p < .001). For the impact of following contexts, pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction were further conducted. Results show that the effects of the four following contexts are significantly different from each other (p < .001). In terms of social predictors, gender did not reach statistical significance and was eliminated by the best-fit model. age (p < .001) exerted an important impact, with younger speakers producing [ʔ] more frequently than older speakers, suggesting that the rates of producing a glottal stop tend to decrease with increasing speaker age. The realization of /t/ is further controlled by speech style (p < .001), with T-glottaling being more likely to occur in unscripted speech categories (e.g., broadcast interviews) compared with the scripted ones (e.g., legal presentations).
Table 4. Best-fit mixed-effects logistic regression model for the realization of word-final /t/ (n = 7125) as dependent variable, with speaker and word as random intercepts (Predicted outcome: [ʔ]. Level of significance: *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001)
The constraints that appear to affect the patterning of word-medial /t/ are similar to those found for word-final /t/. Table 5 shows the best-fit mixed-effects model for word-medial /t/ and the significant factors thereof, including following context, age, and speech style. Unlike word-final /t/, the effects of word type on word-medial T-glottaling did not reach statistical significance. The factors preceding context and gender were eliminated by the best-fit model. Regarding the following contexts that medial /t/ precedes, sonorant consonants (p = .008) were found to be the most favorable context for glottal replacement, followed by obstruents, while a following vowel (p < .001) and a following syllabic liquid (p < .001) disfavored glottal stops. Here, pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction showed that the effects of sonorant consonants and obstruents are significantly different from the effects of syllabic liquids (p < .01) and vowels (p < .001). Differences between the other contexts did not reach statistical significance. Like for word-final /t/, age exerted a significant impact on word-medial /t/, with [ʔ] occurring more frequently in the speech of younger speakers than older speakers (p < .001). Likewise, unscripted speaking styles promoted T-glottaling word-medially more than the scripted ones (p < .001).
Table 5. Best-fit mixed-effects logistic regression model for the realization of word-medial /t/ (n = 5037) as dependent variable, with speaker and word as random intercepts (Predicted outcome: [ʔ]. Level of significance: *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001)
Multivariate analysis of T-glottaling by Wells’ type
Considering that the three types of T-glottaling proposed by Wells (Reference Wells, Medina Casado and Soto Palomo1997) were found to have different realization rates in specific varieties of English, with the variable patterns being affected by different social factors (e.g., Badia Barrera, Reference Badia Barrera2015; Marshall, Reference Marshall2001; Straw & Patrick, Reference Straw and Patrick2007), statistical modelling was further carried out for the realization of /t/ in both word-final and word-medial positions with type as an internal fixed predictor and speech, gender, and age as external fixed predictors. Interactions between type and the three social factors were also tested by the mixed-effects logistic regression model. Table 6 shows that the four factors as well as their interactions (type*age, type*gender, and type*speech style) exerted statistically significant influence on T-glottaling in SSE. Figures 3–5 show the patterns of T-glottaling under the influence of the interactions of the factors predicted by the model.
Table 6. Mixed-effects logistic regression model for the realization of /t/ (n = 12,162) as dependent variable, with speaker and word as random intercepts (Predicted outcome: [ʔ]. Level of significance: *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001)
Figure 3. Effects of age on the three types of T-glottaling.
As shown in Table 6, the percentage of T-glottaling differs considerably across the three different types in SSE. As expected, Type 1 (i.e., T-glottaling preceding an obstruent or a sonorant consonant both word-finally and word-medially) is shown to be the most favorable phonetic context for the use of a glottal stop (53%), followed by Type 2 (i.e., word-final T-glottaling preceding a vowel or a pause; 25.6%), while Type 3 (i.e., word-medial T-glottaling preceding a vowel or a syllabic liquid) is extremely rare (3.7%). Post-hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction on type show that the effects of the three types on T-glottaling are significantly different from each other (p < .001).
Figure 3 shows that the realization of the three types of T-glottaling is constrained by speaker age (p = .002). Overall, the percentage of T-glottaling decreases with the increase of speaker age in all three types. Specifically, Type 1 is used by all speakers, albeit with younger speakers producing more glottal stops than older speakers. This is similar for Type 2, yet with a significantly lower overall rate of occurrences compared with Type 1 (p < .001). Type 3, on the other hand, only occurs among young speakers; speakers aged over 40 use the alveolar variant [t] categorically in this phonetic context (p < .001)Footnote 2.
The results of the mixed-effects model further suggest significant effects of gender on the production of glottal stops for /t/ (p = .031). As Figure 4 shows, a distinction between men and women in the use of T-glottaling is present only in Type 1, with female speakers using glottal stops more frequently than their male counterparts across all age groups. T-glottaling in the other two types did not show major differences between women and men.
Figure 4. Effects of age*gender on the three types of T-glottaling.
Figure 5 demonstrates the effects of speech style on the three types of T-glottaling (p < .001). As can be seen, all three types occurred in both scripted and unscripted speech with the latter being more favorable, albeit with distinctive patterns. As regards Type 1 T-glottaling, this is used more frequently in unscripted speech than scripted speaking styles across all age groups. For Type 2, the distinction between the two speaking styles is the most marked among young speakers and decreases with increasing speaker age. Type 3 exhibits a similar trend, but only for speakers under 40 years of age. Again, older speakers were predicted to use the alveolar [t] almost categorically in this phonetic context.
Figure 5. Effects of age*speech style on the three types of T-glottaling.
After examining the global distribution of T-glottaling in relation to various social factors across all speakers, we further explored individual realization of T-glottaling. Based on 91 speakers who produced words with /t/ in each of the three phonetic environments described by Wells (Reference Wells, Medina Casado and Soto Palomo1997) at least 10 times, significant inter- and intra-speaker variability was identified. That is, different degrees of T-glottaling exist between and within individual speakers (see Appendix A for individual realization plots and Appendix B for age, gender, and speech category of the 91 speakers). Figure 6 presents six representative examples among the speakers: 58/91 speakers (about 64%) did not produce glottal stops for Type 3 at all, such as speaker s102 (n = 46), who realized nearly 75% of Type 1 and slightly more than half of Type 2 but none of Type 3 as glottal stops. Among the 58 speakers, three also realized [t] for Type 2 categorically like speaker s21 (n = 134) in Figure 6. In other words, these three speakers only produced glottal stops for Type 1 contexts but never for Type 2 or Type 3 contexts. T-glottaling for Type 1, on the other hand, was not produced exclusively for any individual.
Figure 6. Individual differences in rate of T-glottaling in the three types.
As expected, most of the speakers (77/91, including the 58 speakers discussed above; about 85%) produced glottal stops with the hierarchy of Type 1 > Type 2 > Type 3, with different degrees of T-glottaling in each environment. Speaker s45 (n = 47), for example, realized nearly 90% of the /t/ tokens as [ʔ] for Type 1, 68% for Type 2, and only 9% for Type 3. A less prominent pattern concerns Type 2 > Type 1 > Type 3, and 12 speakers in total displayed this pattern such as speaker s62 (n = 114; 81% for Type 1; 95% for Type 2; 57% for Type 3). As Figure 6 illustrates, it is also possible for some speakers to show a very similar distribution of Type 1 and Type 2 (e.g., speaker s78: n = 62). Speaker s82 (n = 107) even produced similar rates of glottal stops for all the three types, with Type 2 realization being slightly lower than for the other two types.
Discussion
The aim of this study was to explore the status of T-glottaling in present-day SSE. It constituted the first large-scale study comprising more than 130 speakers and analyzing a wide range of social and linguistic factors that potentially influence T-glottaling in this variety. The results show that about one third of the analyzed /t/ tokens are realized as a glottal stop, albeit with considerable inter-speaker and intra-speaker variability. SSE speakers produce significantly more T-glottaling in word-final than in word-medial position, which confirms findings by Hall-Lew et al. (Reference Hall-Lew, Markl, Papineau and Sung2019), who investigated the speech of 17 famous Scottish women, as well as findings by Schleef (Reference Schleef2013) for Edinburgh teenagers. Moreover, we found that some of the social and linguistic factors that we investigated influence the rate of T-glottaling in word-final and word-medial /t/ differently (which was also found by Schleef [Reference Schleef2013]). This finding calls for future studies to focus on the examination of T-glottaling in those two positions separately.
For the production of both word-final and word-medial /t/ in SSE, the following phonetic context, age, and speech style were found to constrain the rate of T-glottaling. While following sonorant consonants and obstruents favor word-final T-glottaling, following vowels and pauses do not, showing the typical hierarchy of C > V > P (cf. Hall-Lew et al., Reference Hall-Lew, Markl, Papineau and Sung2019 for Scottish English). Thus, in this respect, SSE’s diffusion pattern differs from the C > P > V found in Edinburgh speech (Schleef, Reference Schleef2013), British accents (Straw & Patrick, Reference Straw and Patrick2007), and the Buckie dialect (Smith & Holmes-Elliott, Reference Smith and Holmes-Elliott2017), which showed the highest word-final T-glottaling before vowels. Our findings thus underline the special status of SSE as a standard variety in Scotland that is influenced by multiple norms from both within and outside of Scotland (e.g., Schützler, Reference Schützler and Lawson2014).
As regards the word-medial position, both sonorant consonants and obstruents favor the realization of /t/ as a glottal stop in SSE, while a following vowel and syllabic liquid disfavor glottal stops. As in all other varieties of Scottish English that have been analyzed so far, T-glottaling is more likely to occur in unscripted speech than in scripted speech, and younger speakers of SSE produce [ʔ] more frequently than older speakers in both word-final and word-medial positions. We have, thus, observed an apparent time pattern which could be evidence of an ongoing language change in SSE towards more T-glottaling in future years.
The general lack of general gender differences found for T-glottaling in SSE is in line with findings on other aspects of the phonology of SSE based on the same dataset from ICE-Scotland such as the degree of rhoticity (Meer, Fuchs, Gerfer, Gut, & Li, Reference Meer, Fuchs, Gerfer, Gut and Li2021) and the realization of the nurse vowel (Li, Gut, & Schützler, Reference Li, Gut and Schützler2021). Although various language-internal and -external factors were identified in those studies that influence these phonetic/phonological realizations, gender differences were not found. Only the realization of <wh> in SSE was found to be constrained by gender, with female speakers producing a significantly higher amount of [w]-like realizations containing less friction than their male counterparts (Li & Gut, Reference Li and Gut2022). Like for T-glottaling in Type 1 phonetic contexts, female SSE speakers appeared to take the lead in the ongoing change resulting in the merger of /ʍ/ and /w/ in SSE. Overall, however, our findings suggest that a standard variety such as SSE is less subject to variation across genders than other (non-standard) varieties.
While the following phonetic context influences the rate of T-glottaling in SSE for word-final and word-medial /t/ alike, differences regarding the impact of word type emerge. More specifically, we found that function words favor T-glottaling significantly more than content words only word-finally in SSE. The influence of word type on word-medial T-glottaling, on the other hand, did not reach statistical significance. This difference between word-final and word-medial T-glottaling in the present study might be due to an imbalance in the data. Only 280 out of 5,037 word-medial tokens in the dataset are function words, which are known to favor glottaling.
One further objective of this study was the investigation of the three types of T-glottaling in SSE that were described by Wells (Reference Wells, Medina Casado and Soto Palomo1997) to have emerged and diffused in RP at different times and to a different degree. For speakers of SSE, the relative realization rates of these types that have been found in RP (Badia Barrera, Reference Badia Barrera2015) were replicated: Type 1 T-glottaling (i.e., T-glottaling preceding an obstruent or a sonorant consonant both word-finally and word-medially) is most frequent, followed by Type 2 (i.e., word-final T-glottaling preceding a vowel or a pause), whereas Type 3 (i.e., word-medial T-glottaling preceding a vowel or a syllabic liquid) is extremely rare. While Type 1 was shown to occur categorically in informal speaking style for young RP speakers (Badia Barrera, Reference Badia Barrera2015) and was proposed to be categorical in many British accents (Straw & Patrick, Reference Straw and Patrick2007), we found that, in SSE, Type 1 T-glottaling is still produced variably with different social constraints and has not yet reached categorical performance in any speech categories or among any speaker groups. This finding is further confirmed by the investigation of individual patterns of T-glottaling across SSE speakers: all speakers in the present study produced Type 1 T-glottaling to different degrees and no one has reached categorical performance yet. This indicates that in SSE the diffusion of T-glottaling seems to be slower/less complete than in other British accents such as RP, which underlines the sociolinguistic uniqueness of SSE as a localized norm spoken in a “multi-dimensional sociolinguistic variation space,” as Maguire (Reference Maguire and Hickey2012:55) put it.
Moreover, Type 3 T-glottaling appears to have entered SSE only relatively recently. While T-glottaling of Types 1 and 2 is produced by speakers of all ages in our dataset, Type 3 is only used among younger speakers below the age of 40, and about 64% of the speakers did not produce Type 3 T-glottaling at all. T-glottaling of Type 2 is increasingly used in unscripted speech by young speakers of SSE (60% for 20-year olds), which might herald an upcoming spread to other speaking types and speaker groups. The occurrence of Type 3 T-glottaling is still rare in SSE, but its more frequent use in unscripted speech for young speakers suggests a possible spread in the future. The fact that gender differences between the speakers of SSE were only found to be significant in Type 1 T-glottaling can be interpreted to confirm the distinctiveness of these three processes.
Overall, the present findings confirm our hypothesis that an implicatory relationship exists between the three types of T-glottaling and that they are developing in the order of Type 1 > Type 2 > Type 3 in SSE. It is still important to note that while the individual patterns of most SSE speakers in the present study followed this order, some of them (12/91) displayed a different pattern of Type 2 > Type 1 > Type 3. Our findings suggest that, in future studies, these types of T-glottaling should be analyzed separately.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the German Research Council (DFG; GU 548/13-1). We are grateful to our reviewers for their very useful comments on earlier versions of this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare none.
Figure A1. Individual realization of T-glottaling in the three types.
Table B1. List of speakers with age, gender, and ICE-Scotland text category
