There was an error in the title for this article. This has since been updated to reflect the correct title. The author and publisher apologise for this error.
No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Response to ‘ECT vs sham ECT for depression: do study limitations invalidate the evidence (and mean we should stop using ECT)?’ – CORRIGENDUM
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 October 2021
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Corrigendum
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
References
Read, J. (2021). Response to ‘ECT vs sham ECT for depression: do study limitations invalidate the evidence (and mean we should stop using ECT)?’. BJPsych Advances, 27(5), 292–294. doi: 10.1192/bja.2021.40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
This correction applies to the following article(s):
You have
Access
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.