To the Editor—On my weekly device rounds at a long-term acute care hospital (LTACH), I asked my patient 5 days into his stay for treatment of osteomyelitis: “Sir, why do you have this urinary catheter?” He shrugged his shoulders while walking in the corridor and said, “I don't know. They put it in about 10 days ago while I was in the hospital.”
Much like “Lost in Translation,” when a translation omits information pertinent to understanding its meaning, we continue to face a “Lost in Transition,” when a transition omits information pertinent to treating the patient. The National Transition of Care Coalition defines transition of care as a patient leaving one care setting and moving to another. 1 Errors in transition include communication errors, medication reconciliation issues, failure to clarify patient goals, lost or missing paperwork, and difficulty accessing records between facilities. These mistakes often have far-reaching effects and may lead to adverse events, even resulting in death. 1 , Reference Coleman 2 LTACHs frequently work with patients with complex problems, sometimes on mechanical ventilators, and often arriving with central lines and catheters in place, with the expectation of a prolonged recovery. In addition, laboratory and imaging results may be pending when the patient is transferred and the results are not forwarded. These factors put these patients in a most vulnerable position or “Lost in Transition.”
The concept of long-term acute care arose from the tuberculosis sanatoriaReference Liu, Baseggio and Wissoker 3 and polio hospitalsReference Stevens, Hart and Herridge 4 of days gone by. A need for long-term acute care of other ventilator-dependent patients led to an expansion of this patient base and with an increase of skilled employees and equipment in the 1990s, these hospitals were now able to take on long-term intensive care unit patients; the modern LTACH was born. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services defines the LTACH as “certified as acute-care hospitals, but focusing on patients who, on average, stay more than 25 days.” Most patients arrive from hospital intensive care units and cardiac care units, likely with more than one problem, but may improve with time. From 1998 to 2006, the number of post–acute care patients using LTACHs increased from almost 14,000 to more than 40,000.Reference Kahn, Benson and Appleby 5
While LTACHs are increasing in number and utilization, from an infectious disease standpoint, LTACHs are lagging in antibiotic stewardship and infection control. Ten years ago, Gould et alReference Gould, Rothenberg and Steinberg 6 showed that the prevalence of many resistant microorganisms in LTACHs was greater than the 90th percentile compared with medical intensive care units. Her team recommended that further studies and optimal infection control practices be implemented in the LTACH setting, but little has been done in that regard during the past decade. Although individual LTACH companies claim to have implemented stewardship and multidisciplinary approaches to the problem, government oversight trails behind. The data do not put blame necessarily on the LTACH for the level of resistance; in fact, much of the resistance originates with colonized patients upon admission. What is known, is that the risk of horizontal transmission will be greater in LTACHs with a higher population of patients infected with antibiotic-resistant organisms.Reference Austin, Bonten and Weinstein 7
A 2008 point-prevalence study of one Baltimore LTACH by Furuno et alReference Furuno, Hebden and Standiford 8 found a 28% incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and 30% for Acinetobacter baumannii. In one month, Goldstein et alReference Goldstein, Polonsky, Touzani and Citron 9 found that 13% of patients admitted to one LTACH arrived positive for Clostridium difficile toxin and another 14% acquired C. difficile infection during that month.
The sweeping Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 aimed to improve quality of care in the LTACH setting. In 2013 catheter-associated urinary tract infections, central line–associated bloodstream infections, and new or worsening pressure ulcers were to be reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network in order to receive full payment from Medicare. In 2014, healthcare professionals and patients were to be assessed for influenza vaccinations and this data also recorded by the National Healthcare Safety Network, with an eventual financial penalty for nonreporting. Finally, this year, LTACHs were required to begin reporting methicillin-resistant S. aureus as well as C. difficile to the National Healthcare Safety Network. The next few years will bring other Affordable Care Act–mandated reforms, including reporting of ventilator-associated illnesses (2016), falls resulting in injury (2016), and change in mobility of ventilator-dependent patients (2016), and calculating all-cause readmission rates (2017). There is no argument that these changes are important. What strikes us as shortsighted is that with all of these mandates, none include incentives to decrease infection or readmission rates. Nor do these changes include suggestions, systems, or oversight of appropriate antibiotic and medical device usage in the LTACH setting. 10
Currently there are nearly 16,000 skilled nursing facilities and 428 long-term acute care facilities in the United States, serving an estimated 15 million residents every year.Reference Harris-Kojetin, Sengupta, Park-Lee and Valverde 11 , 12 Amidst the aging baby boomers, the demand for these facilities is projected to further expand, calling for a more serious infection control and stewardship effort. This demand is coupled with a paucity of infectious diseases physicians in practice (currently at a low number of 7,149 nationally 13 ); it is uncertain who will guide this huge growing network of LTACHs toward implementing federal policies for an effective and persistent stewardship program.
On the basis of the rapid growth of the LTACH system, persistent lack of oversight, and failure to implement effective, across-the-board antibiotic stewardship programs, we seriously question the safety of care in LTACHs. For the time being, it may be safer for our patients to remain in acute care hospitals until ready to be discharged to home or to a skilled nursing facility. If LTACHs are serious about improving patient health and decreasing the number of infections, especially antibiotic-resistant infections, then there needs to be improved communication, especially at the time of transition to or from the LTACH. A comprehensive plan for infection management and antibiotic stewardship following Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations should be the standard at all LTACHs. Prospective studies demonstrating proven measures to reduce infection and prevent LTACHs from remaining a reservoir of infection are urgently needed.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Financial support. None reported.
Potential conflicts of interest. All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.