Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T22:05:51.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RICHARD JANKO, ‘GOING BEYOND MULTITEXTS: THE ARCHETYPE OF THE ORPHIC GOLD LEAVES’ – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Erratum
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 2017 

In the version of this article published in CQ 66.1 (2016), 100–27,Footnote 1 Table 2 was intended to be printed on a single opening, so that the reconstructed text and the apparatus criticus would be legible at the same time, and could be compared with the translation on the opposite page. We regret, however, that Table 2 was incorrectly printed on pages 123-4, which are a recto and a verso, owing to a problem in pagination at the proof stage. Table 2 is therefore correctly reproduced on the pages overleaf.

Table 2

fontes: lamellae E(ntellae), H(ipponii), P(eteliae), Φ (Pharsali): 1 E 1, H 1, P 12; 2 E 2, P 13; 3 E 3, P 14; 4 E 4, H 2, P 1, Φ 1; 5 E 5, H 3, P 2, Φ 2; 6 E 6, H 4; 7 E 7, H 5, P 3, Φ 3; 8 E 8, H 6, P 4, Φ 4; 9 E 9, H 7, P 5, Φ 5; 10 E 10, H 8; 11 E 11, H 9; 10a–11a Φ 6–7; 12 E 12, H 10, P 6, Φ 8; 13 E 15, P 7, Φ 9 (rescriptum); 14 E 13, H 11, P 8, Φ 10; 15 E 14, H 12, P 9; 16 E 16, H 13; 17 E 17, H 14, P 10, Φ 11; 18 H 15; 19 H 16; 20 E 18, P 11

* = haec editio; [E] vel [P] = deest E vel P

1 ⌊Μνημοϲύ⌋νηϲ anon. in Brit. Mus. cat. ap. P: Μναμοϲύναϲ H: [E]  τόδε ἔργ͙ον Burkert ap. H: τοδεεριον H: τόδ⟨ε⟩ ἔργ⌊ον⌋ Guarducci ap. P (τοδεν[ leg. Kaibel, τοδερ̣γ̣[ vel τοδει̣ρ̣[ Smith, sed nunc τοδει̣[ tantum legi): [E]  ἐπεὶ ἂν Merkelbach: ἐπεὶ ἂμ H: ἐπὴν West: [EP]  μέλλε̄ιϲι H: μέλ⌋λ͙η͙ιϲ͙ι{ν} Riedweg ap. E (]ηνιοιν leg. Frel): [P]  θανεῖϲθαι Riedweg et Pleket ap. E (θαν{ι}ε̄͂ϲθαι Frel): θανε̄͂ϲθαι H: θανεῖϲ̣θα⌊ι⌋ Smith ap. P  2 ἐν χρυϲίωι Guarducci in lac. x litt. ap. P: ἐν δέλτωι Gallavotti: [E]  γραψ[άϲθω *: γραψ[ P: γράψ[αι Gallavotti: [E]  μ]εμνημέ⟨ν⟩οϲ Riedweg ap. E: [P]  3 in initio desunt haud minores iv litt. ap. P, sed plures veri simillimum est hic deesse: [E]  μὴ τόν γ’ ἐκ]πά͙γλωϲ̣ ὑ̣πά[γ]ο̣[ι * e P: ]πο̣γλωσυπα[ legi (ο̣ potius quam α̣): ]τ̣ογλωσσ̣ι̣πα ω̣ legit Smith a. 1882 (τ̣ vel π̣; Σ̣Ι̣ potius quam Ε̣Ι̣; ω̣ vel ο̣, ubi spat. litt. ii nunc periit): [E]  ἀμφικαλύψαϲ H: ἀμφικαλύψαι ap. E leg. Frel: ἀμφικαλύψαϲ͙ Riedweg ap. E  4 εὑρήϲ{ϲ}ειϲ δ’ Franz ap. P: εὑρήϲ{ϲ}ειϲ * ap. Φ (sc. ΕΥΡΗΣΕΙϹ): ειϲ H (εἶϲ ‘ibis' intellexit Merkelbach, εἰϲ Pugliese Carratelli): [E]  δόμων P: δόμοιϲ Φ: δόμōϲ εὐε̄ρέαϲ H: [E]  ἐπὶ δεξιὰ *: ἔϲτ’ ἐπὶ δ⟨ε⟩ξιὰ Pugliese Carratelli ap. H: ἐνδέξια Φ: ἐπ’ ἀριϲτερὰ P: ]δεξια E  κρήνην PΦ: κρε̄́να H: λίμνην E  5 αὐτῆι λευκὴν ἑϲτηκυῖαν PΦ: ἑϲτη⌋κυ⟨ῖ⟩αν͙ Riedweg ap. E (ἑϲτη]κῦαι Frel): αὐτὰν ἑϲτακυ⟨ῖ⟩α λευκὰ Marcovich ap. H  κυπάριϲϲον EPΦ: κυπάριϲ⟨ϲ⟩οϲ Pugliese Carratelli ap. H  6 ψκχαι Hac  νεκύōν H  7 ταύτηϲ τῆϲ κρήνηϲ PΦ: ταύταϲ τᾶϲ͙ κράναϲ Sacco ap. H (-ρκρ- lamella): [E]  μηδὲ PΦ: με̄δὲ H: ]δε E  ϲχεδὸν ἐ⟨μ⟩πελάϲ⟨αϲ⟩θαι Riedweg ap. E: ϲχεδὸν ἐμπελάϲειαϲ P: ϲχεδόθεν πελάϲηιϲθα Φ: ϲχεδὸν ἐνγύθεν ἔλθε̄ιϲ H  8 πρόϲθεν δ’ hευρε̄́ϲειϲ H: πρόϲϲω δ’ εὑρήϲειϲ Φ: εὑρήϲειϲ δ’ ἑτέραν P: [E]  τῆϲ P: τᾶϲ H: τὸ Φ: [E]  Μνημοϲύνηϲ ἀπὸ λίμνηϲ EPΦ: Μναμοϲύναϲ ἀπὸ λίμναϲ H  9 προρέον HP: προ⟨ρέον⟩ Zuntz post Verdelis in Φ: [E]  φυλακοὶ EΦ ac: φύλακεϲ HPΦ pc  δ’ vel δ(ὲ) HPΦ: θ’ E  ἐπύπερθεν HΦ: ἐ͙πύ͙πε⟨ρ⟩θ⟨εν⟩ Riedweg et Cassio ap. E (υποπεθ leg. Frel): ἐπίπροϲθ`ε´ν P  ἔαϲιν PΦ: ⟨ἔ⟩αϲιν Riedweg et Cassio ap. E: ἔαϲι H  10 οἳ Zuntz ap. H (οἱ Merkelbach et Marcovich): [E]  δή ϲ’ Merkelbach et Marcovich (cf. 10a): δε ϲε H, sc. δε̄́ ϲ(ε): δέ ϲε Pugliese Carratelli: [E]  ἐν⟨ὶ⟩ Merkelbach et Lloyd-Jones: ἐν H: [E]  πευκαλίμη⟨ι⟩ϲιν Frel ap. E: πευκαλίμαιϲι H  11 ὅτ⟨τ⟩ι Guarducci post Pugliese Carratelli ap. H: [E]  δε̄̀ Zuntz ap. H (δὲ Pugliese Carratelli): [E]  ϲκότο]ν͙ * ap. E: ]μ leg. Frel ap. E: ϲκότοϲ H: ϲκότο]ϲ͙ Riedweg ap. E  ὀρ͙φ{ο}νήεντα * ap. E (ουφονηεντα leg. Frel): ὀρ͙φ{ο}νήεντο͙⟨ϲ⟩ Riedweg ap. E: ὀρφ⟨ν⟩ε̄́εντοϲ Ebert ap. H  10a–11a vv. quos pro 10–11 finxit Φ ex archetypo omisi  10a οἳ δε̄́ ϲ’ * (cf. 10): οἱ δε̄́ ϲ’ Merkelbach: οἱ δέ ϲ’ Zuntz: οἱ δέ ϲ⟨ε⟩ West: οἳ δέ ϲ⟨ε⟩ Bernabé: οἵδε ϲ’ Verdelis  11a τοῖϲ δὲ Zuntz: τοῖϲδε Verdelis  12 εἰπεῖν PΦ: εἶπον H: [E]  Γῆϲ παῖϲ εἰμι PΦ (πάιϲ Gallavotti, fort. recte): Γ̣ε̃ϲ παῖ⟨ϲ⟩ ε̄̓μι Sacco ap. H: [E]  Οὐρανοῦ EPΦ: ˉ̓Ορανō̃ H  ἀϲτερόεντοϲ EHP: αϲτ~ Φ  13 versum hic praebet P: post 15 collocat E: om. H  αὐτὰρ ἐμοὶ γένοϲ οὐράνιον P: αὐτὰρ ε[ E: Ἀϲτέριοϲ ὄνομα Φ  τὸ δὲ {δ} ἴϲτε καὶ αὐτο`ί´ P: om. Φ: [E]  τὸ δὲ {δ} West: τόδε δ’ Franz  14 δίψηι PΦ: δίψαι H: [E]  εἰμ’ Φ: ε̄̓μ’ H: εἰμ(ι) P: [E]  αὖοϲ HΦ: αὔη P, ut fort. E propter spatium: [E]  καὶ ἀπόλλυμαι HP: ⟦κ̣⟧ Φ: ]μαι E  ἀλλὰ EPΦ: ἀλ⟨λ⟩ὰ Pugliese Carratelli ap. H  δότ’ αἶψα P: δότ’ ō῏κ̣α̣ Pugliese Carratelli ap. H: δότε μμοι E: δότε μοι Φ  15 πιέναι H, ut fort. E propter spatium: προρέον P: [E]  τῆϲ P: τε̄͂ϲ H: [E]  λίμνηϲ EP: λίμ⟨ν⟩ε̣̄ϲ Pugliese Carratelli ap. H  16 δὴ τοὶ *: δε̄́ τοι Pugliese Carratelli ap. H: τοὶ δ͙ὴ͙ Riedweg post τοι δ͙ὴ͙ Bernabé ap. E (τοι ἂν leg. Frel)  ἐρέōϲιν Lazzarini ap. H: [E]  h͙υποχθονίōι * ap. H (ιυπο-): [E]  βαϲιλε̄͂ϊ Merkelbach ap. H: βαϲιλεί⟨αι⟩ West: [E]  17 καὶ τότε τ[οι Bernabé ap. E (cf. Hom. Od. 4.480): καὶ δε̄́ τοι H (δε̄́ τοι deleverit Gallavotti): καὐτ[οί ϲ]οι Kaibel ap. P (litt. ]ο primus legi, sed ut ]ϲ[ intellexit Bernabé, post quem καὶ͙ ⟨δή⟩ τοι coniecerim): om. Φ  δ`ώ´ϲουϲι πιεῖν P: δṓϲōϲι πιε̄͂ν H: πιεν Φ (πιε̄͂ν Verdelis, πιέν’ Cassio collato H 12): [E]  θείηϲ P: τᾶϲ Μναμοϲύναϲ H contra metrum: om. Φ: [E]  ἀπὸ H: ἀπ⌊ὸ Franz ap. P: ἀπὸ τῆϲ{ϲ} * ap. Φ (sc. ΤΗΣ) contra metrum  λίμ⌋ν̣ηϲ Franz ap. P: λίμ`ναϲ´ H: κρήνηϲ Φ: κρή⌋ν̣ηϲ Goettling ap. P  18–19 versum om. E  18 δε̄̀ ϲὺ πιṑν H  ἔρχεα⟨ι⟩ Pugliese Carratelli  ἥ͙ν *: hάν H  19 βάχχοι H  ἱερὴ͙ν *: hιερὰν H  ϲτείχōϲι H  κλεε̣[ι]ν̣οι * ap. H: κλε⟨ε⟩ιν̣οί Burkert et Merkelbach  20 versum om. H  τότ’ ἔπειτ’ P: τότε δ[ὴ Riedweg ap. E  ἄ[λλοιϲι Kaibel ap. P (τέλη Edmonds): [E]  μεθ’ suppl. Franz ap. P: [E]  ἀνάξει[ϲ Franz ap. P: [E]  post 20 E 19–21 ex archetypo om. *

References

1 Janko, R., ‘Going beyond multitexts: the archetype of the Orphic gold leaves’, CQ 66 (2016), 100–27, at 123–4Google Scholar.

Figure 0

Table 2