Book contents
- The Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International Law
- The Rules of Interpretation of Customary International Law
- The Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Table of Cases
- Table of International Treaties, Documents and National Legislation
- Part I The Theory of Customary International Law
- Part II Customary International Law as a Source of International Law
- Part III The Practice of Customary International Law Across Various Fora
- Part IV Interpretation of Customary International Law
- Part V Customary International Law in the Practice of Domestic Courts
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2022
Book contents
- The Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International Law
- The Rules of Interpretation of Customary International Law
- The Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Table of Cases
- Table of International Treaties, Documents and National Legislation
- Part I The Theory of Customary International Law
- Part II Customary International Law as a Source of International Law
- Part III The Practice of Customary International Law Across Various Fora
- Part IV Interpretation of Customary International Law
- Part V Customary International Law in the Practice of Domestic Courts
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
- Creative Commons
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Primary Sources
Abi-Saab, G, ‘La coutume dans tous ses états ou le dilemma du développement du droit international général dans un monde éclaté’ in Ago, R (ed), Le Droit international à l’heure de sa codification: études en l’honneur de Roberto Ago (Giuffrè 1987) 61Google Scholar
Achour, YB, Le Rôle des Civilisations dans le Système International (Droit et Relations Internationales) (Editions Bruylant/Editions de l’Université des Bruxelles 2003)Google Scholar
Acquaviva, G & Whiting, A, International Criminal Law: Cases and Commentary (Oxford University Press 2011)Google Scholar
Agius, MF, Interaction and Delimitation of International Legal Orders (Brill Nijhoff 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akande, D, ‘Classification of Armed Conflicts: Relevant Legal Concepts’ in Wilmshurst, E (ed), International Law and the Classification of Conflicts (Oxford University Press 2012) 52Google Scholar
Allott, P, ‘Interpretation: An Exact Art’ in Bianchi, A, Peat, D and Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford University Press 2015) 373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law: The Foreign Relations of the United States, Vol 1 (American Law Institute Publishers 1987)Google Scholar
Ammann, O, Domestic Courts and the Interpretation of International Law: Methods and Reasoning Based on the Swiss Example (Brill 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anghie, A, ‘On Critique and the Other’ in Orford, A (ed), International Law and its Others (Cambridge University Press 2006) 389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anghie, A, Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2008)Google Scholar
Anschütz, G, Die Verfassung des deutschen Reichs vom 11 August 1919: Ein Kommentar für Wissenschaft und Praxis (4th ed, Stilke 1924)Google Scholar
Apalagaki, Ch, Code of Civil Procedure: Article by Article Interpretation, Articles 1–590 (4th ed, Nomiki Vivliothiki 2016) 1405Google Scholar
Arajärvi, N, The Changing Nature of Customary International Law: Methods of Interpreting the Concept of Custom in International Criminal Tribunals (Routledge 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arajärvi, N, ‘From the “Demands of Humanity”: The Formulation of Opinio Juris in Decisions of International Criminal Tribunals and the Need for a Renewed Emphasis on State Practice’ in Lepard, B (ed), Reexamining Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) 190Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, G, ‘Customary Law: A Few More Thoughts on the Theory of “Spontaneous International” Custom’ in Salmon, J (ed), Droit du pouvoir, pouvoir du droit: mélanges offerts à Jean Salmon (Bruylant 2007) 93Google Scholar
Arend, AC, Legal Rules and International Society (Oxford University Press 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aznar, MJ & Methymaki, E, ‘Article 2’ in Zimmermann, A & Tams, CJ (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2019) 303Google Scholar
Bangerter, O, Internal Control: Codes of Conduct within Insurgent Armed Groups (Small Arms Survey 2012)Google Scholar
Barile, G, I principi fondamentali della comunità statale ed il coordinamento tra sistemi (CEDAM 1969)Google Scholar
Bassiouni, MC, ‘Advancing the Responsibility to Protect Through International Criminal Justice’ in Cooper, RH & Voïnov Kohler, J (eds), Responsibility to Protect: The Global Moral Compact for the 21st Century (Palgrave Macmillan 2009) 31Google Scholar
Bassiouni, MC, ‘Revisiting the Architecture of Crimes Against Humanity: Almost a Century in the Making, with Gaps and Ambiguities Remaining – the Need for a Specialized Convention’ in Sadat, LN (ed), Forging a Convention for Crimes Against Humanity (Cambridge University Press 2011) 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, H, Die Bundestreue. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Dogmatik des Bundesstaatsrechts und zur Rechtsverhältnislehre (Mohr Siebeck 1992)Google Scholar
Bedjaoui, M, ‘L’opportunité dans les décisions de la Cour internationale de Justice’ in Boisson de Chazournes, L & Gowlland-Debbas, V (eds), The International Legal System in Quest of Equity and Universality (Kluwer 2001) 563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beham, M, State Interest and the Sources of International Law. Doctrine, Morality, and Non-Treaty Law (Routledge 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, J, First Principles Preparatory to Constitutional Code (Clarendon Press 1989)Google Scholar
Bentivoglio, LM, La funzione interpretativa nell’ordinamento internazionale (Giuffrè 1958)Google Scholar
Bernaz, N, ‘Reforming the UN Human Rights Protection Procedures: A Legal Perspective on the Establishment of the Universal Periodic Review Mechanism’ in Boyle, K (ed), New Institutions for Human Rights Protection (Oxford University Press 2009) 75Google Scholar
Bianchi, A, ‘Textual Interpretation and (International) Law Reading: The Myth of (in) Determinacy and the Genealogy of Meaning’ in Bekker, P, Dolzer, R, Waibel, M and Vagts, D (eds), Making Transnational Law Work in the Global Economy: Essays in Honour of Detlev Vagts (Cambridge University Press 2010) 53Google Scholar
Bianchi, A, Peat, D & Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford University Press 2015)Google Scholar
Bindreiter, U, ‘The Realist Hans Kelsen’ in Duarte d’Almeida, L, Gardner, J & Green, L (eds), Kelsen Revisited: New Essays on the Pure Theory of Law (Hart 2013) 112Google Scholar
Bradley, CA, ‘Customary International Law Adjudication as Common Law Adjudication’ in Bradley, CA (ed), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press 2016) 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brie, S, Die Lehre vom Gewohnheitsrecht: Eine historisch-dogmatische Untersuchung (Marcus 1899)Google Scholar
Brierly, JL, ‘The Basis of Obligation in International Law’ in Lauterpacht, H & Waldock, CHM (eds), The Basis of Obligation in International Law and Other Papers by the Late James Leslie Brierly (Clarendon Press 1958)Google Scholar
Brierly, JL, The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the International Law of Peace (Waldock, Humphrey ed, 6th ed, Clarendon Press 1963)Google Scholar
Brölmann, C & Radi, Y (eds), Research Handbook on the Theory and Practice of International Lawmaking (Edward Elgar 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brölmann, C, ‘Capturing the Juridical Will of International Organisations’ in Droubi, S & d’Aspremont, J (eds), International Organisations, Non-State Actors and the Formation of Customary International Law (Manchester University Press 2020) 42.Google Scholar
Brown, C, ‘Inherent Powers in International Adjudication’ in Romano, CPR, Alter, K & Shany, Y (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press 2013) 829Google Scholar
Brownlie, I, ‘Problems Concerning the Unity of International Law’ in Ago, R (ed), Le droit international à l’heure de sa codification: études en l’honneur de Roberto Ago (Giuffrè 1987) 155Google Scholar
Brunnée, J & Toope, S, Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge University Press 2010)Google Scholar
Brunnée, J & Toope, S, ‘Constructivism and International Law’ in Dunoff, JL & Pollack, MA (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press 2012) 119Google Scholar
Buchanan, A, Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law (Oxford University Press 2003)Google Scholar
Buchanan, A, ‘Institutional Legitimacy’ in Sobel, D, Vallentyne, P & Wall, S (eds), Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy Volume 4 (Oxford University Press 2018) 57Google Scholar
Burns, JH & Hart, HLA (eds.), A Comment on the Commentaries and a Fragment on Government: The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham (Oxford University Press 2008)Google Scholar
Byers, M, Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 1999)Google Scholar
Cameron, AM, ‘Jural Aspect in Dooyeweerd’s Philosophy of Law’ in Benge, C (ed), In a Reformational Key: Papers presented for the Life, Work and Vision of Duncan Roper (Thumbwidth Press 2020) 292Google Scholar
Capotorti, F, Il diritto dei trattati secondo la Convenzione di Vienna: studio introduttivo al volume Convenzione di Vienna sul diritto dei trattati (CEDAM 1969)Google Scholar
Cardenas, S, Conflict and Compliance: State Responses to International Human Rights Pressure (University of Pennsylvania Press 2010)Google Scholar
Carty, A, The Decay of International Law: A Reappraisal of the Limits of Legal Imagination in International Affairs (Manchester University Press 2019)Google Scholar
Cassese, A, ‘For an Enhanced Role of Jus Cogens’ in Cassese, A (ed), Realizing Utopia: The Future of International Law (Oxford University Press 2012) 158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, A & Weiler, JHH, Change and Stability in International Law-Making (Walter de Gruyter 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, B, ‘Custom: The Future of General State Practice in a Divided World’ in St John Macdonald, R & Johnston, DM (eds), The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy Doctrine and Theory (Martinus Nijhoff 1983) 513Google Scholar
Cheng, B, General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (Grotius 1987)Google Scholar
Chiassoni, P, ‘Wiener Realism’ in Duarte d’Almeida, L, Gardner, J & Green, L (eds), Kelsen Revisited: New Essays on the Pure Theory of Law (Hart 2013)Google Scholar
Choi, SJ & Gulati, M, ‘Customary International Law: How Do Courts Do It?’ in Bradley, CA (ed), Custom’s Future. International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press 2016) 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, T, ‘Is Democratic Legitimacy Possible for International Institutions?’ in Archibugi, D, Koenig-Archibugi, M & Marchetti, R (eds), Global Democracy Normative and Empirical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2011) 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, T, ‘Climate Change and State Consent’ in Moss, J (ed), Climate Change and Justice (Cambridge University Press 2015) 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, T, ‘Ronald Dworkin, State Consent, and Progressive Cosmopolitanism’ in Waluchow, W & Sciaraffa, S (eds), The Legacy of Ronald Dworkin (Oxford University Press 2016) 49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clouser, R, The Myth of Religious Neutrality (University of Notre Dame Press 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, HG, ‘Theorizing Precedent in International Law’ in Bianchi, A, Peat, D & Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford University Press 2015) 268Google Scholar
Cohen, J, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Induction and Probability (Clarendon Press 1989)Google Scholar
Collins, R, ‘Consent, Obligation and the Legitimate Authority of International Law’ in Capps, P & Olsen, HP (eds), Legal Authority Beyond the State (Cambridge University Press 2018) 206Google Scholar
Condorelli, L, ‘Customary International Law: The Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow of General International Law’ in Cassese, A (ed), Realizing Utopia: The Future of International Law (Oxford University Press 2012) 148Google Scholar
Cook, G, A Digest of WTO Jurisprudence on Public International Law Concepts and Principles (Cambridge University Press 2015)Google Scholar
Corten, O, Méthodologie du droit international public (Editions de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles 2009)Google Scholar
Cotterrell, R, ‘Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically?’ in Del Mar, M & Giudice, M (eds), Legal Theory and the Social Sciences Vol II (Routledge 2010) 101Google Scholar
Cowan, J, ‘The Universal Periodic Review as Public Audit Ritual: An Anthropological Perspective on Emerging Practices in the Global Governance of Human Rights’ in Charlesworth, H &Larking, E (eds), Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review: Rituals and Ritualism (Cambridge University Press 2015) 44Google Scholar
Craven, M, ‘The Invention of a Tradition: Westlake, The Berlin Conference and the Historicisation of International Law’ in Nuzzo, L & Vec, M, Constructing International Law: The Birth of a Discipline (Klostermann 2012) 4Google Scholar
Crawford, J, The Creation of States in International Law (Oxford University Press 2007)Google Scholar
Crawford, J, Chance, Order, Change: The Course of International Law, General Course of Public International Law (Brill 2014)Google Scholar
Crawford, J, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (9th ed, Oxford University Press 2019) 369Google Scholar
Crema, L, La prassi successiva e l’interpretazione del diritto internazionale scritto (Giuffré 2017)Google Scholar
D’Amato, A, The Concept of Custom in International Law (Cornell University Press 1971)Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, ‘Conclusion: Inclusive Law-Making and Law-Enforcement Processes for an Exclusive International Legal System’ in d’Aspremont, J (ed), Participants in the International Legal System: Multiple Perspectives on Non-State Actors in International Law (Routledge 2011) 425Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, ‘Current Theorizations about the Treaty in International Law’ in Hollis, D (ed), The Oxford Guide to Treaties (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2020) 46Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, ‘International Law-Making by Non-State Actors: Changing the Model or Putting the Phenomenon into Perspective?’ in Noortmann, M & Ryngaert, C (eds), Non-State Actor Dynamics in International Law: From Law-Takers to Law-Makers (Routledge 2010) 158Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, ‘Non-State Actors and the Formation of International Customary Law: Unlearning Some Common Tropes’ in Droubi, S & d’Aspremont, J (eds), International Organisations, Non-State Actors and the Formation of Customary International Law (Manchester University Press 2020) 166Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, ‘The Doctrinal Illusion of the Heterogeneity of International Law-Making Processes’ in Ruiz Fabri, H et al (eds), Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law, vol 2 (Hart 2010) 297Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, ‘The Multidimensional Process of Interpretation: Content-Determination and Law-Ascertainment Distinguished’ in Bianchi, A, Peat, D, & Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford University Press 2015) 111Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, Formalism and the Sources of International Law: A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules (Oxford University Press 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, International Law as a Belief System (Cambridge University Press 2017)Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, The Discourse on Customary International Law (Oxford University Press 2021)Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J & Besson, S (eds), Oxford Handbook of the Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press 2017)Google Scholar
De Visscher, C, Problèmes d’interprétation judiciaire en droit international public (Pedone 1963)Google Scholar
De Visscher, C, Theory and Reality in Public International Law. Revised Edition (Princeton University Press 1968)Google Scholar
Decrey Warner, E et al, ‘Armed Non-State Actors and Humanitarian Norms: Lessons from the Geneva Call Experience’ in Perrin, B (ed), Modern Warfare: Armed Groups, Private Militaries, Humanitarian Organizations, and the Law (UBC Press 2012) 73Google Scholar
Degan, V, L’ interprétation des accords en droit international (Martinus Nijhoff 1963)Google Scholar
Di Nolfo, E, Il disordine internazionale. Lotte per la supremazia dopo la Guerra fredda (Bruno Mondadori 2012)Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y, Non-International Armed Conflicts in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djeffal, C, ‘Dynamic and Evolutive Interpretation of the ECHR by Domestic Courts?’ in Aust, HP & Nolte, G (eds), The Interpretation of International Law by Domestic Courts: Uniformity, Diversity, Convergence (Oxford University Press 2016) 175Google Scholar
Djeffal, C, Static and Evolutive Treaty Interpretation: A Functional Reconstruction (Cambridge University Press 2016)Google Scholar
Dooyeweerd, H, The Collected Works: A New Critique of Theoretical Thought Series A, Vols 1–4 (Freeman DH & De Jongste H trs, Strauss, DFM ed, first published 1953–1958, The Edwin Mellen Press 1997)Google Scholar
Dooyeweerd, H, Roots of Western Culture (Kraay J tr, Vander, Vennen M & Zylstra, B eds, Paideia Press 2012)Google Scholar
Dooyeweerd, H, The Encyclopedia of the Science of Law, Vol 8/1 (RD Knudsen tr & Cameron, AM ed, Paideia Press 2012)Google Scholar
Dörr, O, ‘Article 31’ in Dörr, O & Schmalenbach, K (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2012 Springer) 521Google Scholar
Dosse, F, History of Structuralism Vol 1: The Rising Sign, 1945–1966 (University of Minnesota Press 1997)Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, L (ed), San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea (Grotius Publications, Cambridge University Press 1995)Google Scholar
Droubi, S, ‘Opinio Juris: Between Mental States and Institutional Objects’ in Droubi, S and D’Aspremont, J (eds), International Organizations, Non-State Actors and the Formation of Customary International Law, Melland Schill Perspectives on International Law (Manchester University Press 2020) 62Google Scholar
Droubi, S & d’Aspremont, J (eds), International Organizations, Non-State Actors, and the Formation of Customary International Law, Melland Schill Perspectives on International Law (Manchester University Press 2020)Google Scholar
Dupuy, PM, ‘Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties: Between Memory and Prophecy’ in Cannizzaro, E (ed), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford University Press 2011) 123Google Scholar
Dupuy, PM, ‘Introduction to Customary International Law’ in Dupuy, PM (ed), Customary International Law (Elgar 2021) 1Google Scholar
Dupuy, RJ, ‘Coutume sage et coutume sauvage’ in Rousseau, C (ed), Mélanges offerts à Charles Rousseau: la communauté internationale (Pedone 1974) 75Google Scholar
Fahey, E, The Actors of Postnational Rule-Making: Contemporary Challenges of European and International Law (Routledge 2017)Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M & Merkouris, P, Treaties in Motion: The Evolution of Treaties from Formation to Termination (Cambridge University Press 2020)Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, Elias, O & Merkouris, P, Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of the Treaties: 30 Years On (Brill/Nijhoff 2010)Google Scholar
Fortin, K, The Accountability of Armed Groups under Human Rights Law (Oxford University Press 2017)Google Scholar
Freeman, M, ‘Article 16’ in Freeman, M, Chinkin, C & Rudolf, B (eds), The UN Convention on the Elimination of All forms of Discrimination Against Women: A Commentary (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2013) 436Google Scholar
Galev, G & Dabovikj-Anastasovska, J, Obligaciono Pravo (3rd ed, University of St Cyril and Methodius Skopje 2012)Google Scholar
Gallant, K, The Principle of Legality in International and Comparative Criminal Law (Cambridge University Press 2008)Google Scholar
Gautier, P, ‘Article 2 – Convention of 1969’ in Corten, O & Klein, P (eds), The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2011) 33Google Scholar
Geiss, R, ‘Humanitarian Law Obligations of Organized Armed Groups’ in International Institute of Humanitarian Law (ed), Non-State Actors and International Humanitarian Law: Organized Armed Groups: A Challenge for the 21st Century (FrancoAngeli 2010) 93Google Scholar
Giegerich, T, ‘The Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights on the Immunity of States’ in Peters, A et al (eds), Immunities in the Age of Global Constitutionalism (Brill Nijhoff 2015) 68Google Scholar
Goldmann, M, ‘Relative Normativity’ in d’Aspremont, J & Singh, S (eds), Concepts for International Law: Contributions to Disciplinary Thought (Edward Elgar 2019) 740Google Scholar
Goldsmith, JL & Posner, EA, The Limits of International Law (Oxford University Press 2005)Google Scholar
Gradoni, L, ‘Il principio di precauzione nel diritto dell’Organizzazione Mondiale del Commercio’ in Bianchi, A & Gestri, M (eds), Il principio precauzionale nel diritto internazionale e comunitario (Giuffrè 2006) 147Google Scholar
Guggenheim, P, ‘Les deux elements de la coutume en droit international’, in Scelle, G & Bastid, S (eds), La technique et les principes du droit public : études en l’honneur de Georges Scelle (LGDJ 1950) 275Google Scholar
Guzman, AT & Hsiang, J, ‘Reinvigorating Customary International Law’ in Bradley, CA (ed), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press 2016) 275Google Scholar
Habermas, J, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Twelve Lectures (Lawrence F tr, Polity Press 1987)Google Scholar
Hakimi, M, ‘Custom’s Method and Process: Lessons from Humanitarian Law’ in Bradley, CA (ed), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press 2016) 149Google Scholar
Hamster, J, ‘Customary International Law’ in Nollkaemper, A & Reinisch, A (eds), International Law in Domestic Courts. A Casebook (Oxford University Press 2018) 243Google Scholar
Hart, HLA, Punishment and responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law (Oxford University Press 1968)Google Scholar
Hart, HLA, ‘Commands and Authoritative Legal Reasons’ in Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and Political Philosophy (Oxford University Press 1982)Google Scholar
Hathaway, O & Shapiro, SJ, The Internationalists: And Their Plan to Outlaw War (Allen Lane 2017)Google Scholar
Hayek, G, Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy (University of Chicago Press 1979)Google Scholar
Roger, Henderson, Illuminating Law: The Construction of Herman Dooyeweerd’s Philosophy, 1918–1928 (PhD thesis, Vrije Universitet Amsterdam 1994)Google Scholar
Henckaerts, JM & Doswald-Beck, L, Customary International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press 2005)Google Scholar
Henkin, L, How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy (2nd ed, Columbia University Press 1979)Google Scholar
Hernández, G, ‘Interpretation’ in Kammerhofer, J & d’Aspremont, J (eds), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (Cambridge University Press 2014) 318Google Scholar
Hernández, G, ‘Interpretative Authority and the International Judiciary’ in Bianchi, A, Peat, D & Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford University Press 2015) 166Google Scholar
Higgins, R, The Development of International Law Through the Political Organs of the United Nations (Oxford University Press 1963)Google Scholar
Higgins, R, Problems and Process: International Law and How we Use It (Oxford University Press 1995)Google Scholar
Hollis, D, ‘Sources and Interpretation Theories: An Interdependent Relationship’ in d’Aspremont, J & Besson, S (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press 2017) 422Google Scholar
Hollis, D, ‘Interpretation’ in d’Aspremont, J & Singth, S, Concepts for International Law. Contributions to Disciplinary Thought (Edward Elgar 2019) 559Google Scholar
Hollis, DB, ‘The Existential Function of Interpretation in International Law’ in Bianchi, A, Peat, D & Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford University Press 2015) 78Google Scholar
Imbert, PH, ‘L’Utilisation des droits de l’homme dans les relations internationales’ in Société Française pour le Droit International (ed), Colloque de Strasbourg. La Protection des Droits de l’Homme et l’Évolution du Droit International (Pedone 1998) 282Google Scholar
Inwood, MJ, ‘Hermeneutics’ in Honderich, T (ed), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (Oxford University Press 1995) 353Google Scholar
Jennings, R, ‘The Proliferation of Adjudicatory Bodies: Dangers and Possible Answers’ in Boisson De Chazournes, L (ed), Implications of the Proliferation of International Adjudicatory Bodies for Dispute Resolution (ASIL Publications 1995) 2Google Scholar
Jennings, RY & Watts, A (eds), Oppenheim’s International Law – Vol 1: Peace (9th ed, Longmans 1992)Google Scholar
Jo, H, Compliant Rebels: Rebel Groups and International Law in World Politics (Cambridge University Press 2015)Google Scholar
Joseph, S & Castan, M, The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Cases, Materials and Commentary (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2014)Google Scholar
Kadens, E, ‘Custom’s Past’ in Bradley, CA (ed), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press 2016) 11Google Scholar
Kalshoven, F & Zegveld, L, Constraints on the Waging of War (4th ed, Cambridge University Press 2011)Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J, Uncertainty in International Law: A Kelsenian Perspective (Routledge 2010)Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J, ‘Orthodox Generalists and Political Activists in International Legal Scholarship’ in Happold, M (ed), International Law in a Multipolar World (Routledge 2011) 138Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J, ‘International Legal Positivism’ in Hoffmann, F & Orford, A (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law (Oxford University Press 2016) 407Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J, ‘Sources in Legal Positivist Theories: The Pure Theory’s Structural Analysis of the Law’ in Besson, S & d’Aspremont, J (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press 2017) 343Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J, ‘International Legal Positivist Research Methods’ in Deplano, R & Tsagourias, N (eds), Research Methods in International Law: A Handbook (Edward Elgar 2021) 95Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J, International Investment Law and Legal Theory (Cambridge University Press 2021)Google Scholar
Kanetake, M & Nollkaemper, A, ‘The International Rule of Law in the Cycle of Contestations and Deference’ in Kanetake, M & Nollkaemper, A (eds), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference (Hart Publishing 2016) 445Google Scholar
Kanetake, M, ‘The Interfaces Between the National and International Rule of Law: A Framework Paper’ in Kanetake, M & Nollkaemper, A (eds), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference (Hart 2016) 13Google Scholar
Kant, I, Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Erster Theil. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (2nd ed, Friedrich Nicolovius 1798)Google Scholar
Kedar, N, ‘The Political Origins of the Modern Legal Paradoxes’ in Perez, O & Teubner, G (eds), Paradoxes and Inconsistencies in the Law (Hart 2006) 112Google Scholar
Kelly, JP, ‘Customary International Law in Historical Context: The Exercise of Power without General Acceptance’ in Lepard, BD (ed), Reexamining Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) 47Google Scholar
Kelsen, H, Pure Theory of Law (Knight M tr, 2nd ed, University of California Press 1967)Google Scholar
Kennedy, D, A World of Struggle: How Power, Law, and Expertise Shape Global Political Economy (Princeton University Press 2016)Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B & Straumann, B (eds), The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations (Cambridge University Press 2011)Google Scholar
Klabbers, J, ‘Reluctant “Grundnormen”: Articles 31(3)(c) and 42 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the Fragmentation of International Law’ in Craven, M, Fitzmaurice, M & Vogiatzi, M (eds), Time, History and International Law (Nijhoff 2007) 141Google Scholar
Klabbers, J, ‘Sources of International Organizations’ Law: Reflections on Accountability’ in Besson, S & d’Aspremont, J (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press 2017) 987Google Scholar
Klabbers, J & Palombella, G, ‘Introduction’ in Klabbers, J & Palombella, G (eds), The Challenge of Inter-Legality (Cambridge University Press 2019) 1Google Scholar
Klatt, M, Making the Law Explicit: The Normativity of Legal Argumentation (Oxford University Press 2008)Google Scholar
Kolb, R, Interprétation et création du droit international: esquisses d’ une herméneutique juridique moderne pour le droit international public (Bruylant 2006)Google Scholar
Kolb, R, Interprétation et création du droit international: Esquisse d’une herméneutique juridique moderne pour le droit international public (Bruylant 2006)Google Scholar
Kolb, R & Hyde, R, An Introduction to the International Law of Armed Conflicts (Hart 2008)Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of the International Legal Argument (2nd ed, Cambridge University Press 2005)Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M, ‘The Place of Law in Collective Security’ in Koskenniemi, M M (ed), The Politics of International Law (Hart 2011) 79Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M, ‘Epilogue’ in Werner, W et al (eds), The Law of International Lawyers: Reading Martti Koskenniemi (Cambridge University Press 2017) 406Google Scholar
Krygier, M, ‘The Concept of Law and Social Theory’ in Del Mar, M & Giudice, M (eds), Legal Theory and the Social Sciences (Routledge 2010) 7Google Scholar
Lalonde, S, Determining Boundaries in a Conflicted World: The Role of Uti Possidetis (McGill-Queen’s University Press 2002)Google Scholar
Lammers, H & Simons, W (eds), Die Rechtsprechung des Staatsgerichtshofes für das Deutsche Reich und des Reichsgerichts auf Grund von Article 13 Abs. 2 der Reichsverfassung (Vol 1(37) Stilke 1927)Google Scholar
Lanovoy, V, Complicity and Its Limits in the Law of International Responsibility (Hart 2016)Google Scholar
Latour, B, An Inquiry into Modes of Existence. An Anthropology of the Moderns (Catherine Porter tr, Harvard University Press 2013)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, The Development of International Law by the International Court (Stevens & Sons 1958)Google Scholar
Le Bouthillier, Y & Bonin, J-F, ‘Article 3 – Convention of 1969’ in Corten, O & Klein, P (eds), The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2011) 66Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, D, ‘The Legitimacy of International Law’ in Held, D & Maffettone, P (eds), Global Political Theory (Polity 2016) 98Google Scholar
Lepard, B, ‘Customary International Law as a Dynamic Process’ in Bradley, CA (ed), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press 2016) 62Google Scholar
Lepard, B, ‘Toward a New Theory of Customary International Human Rights Law’ in Lepard, B (ed), Reexamining Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) 262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepard, BD, Rethinking Humanitarian Intervention: A Fresh Legal Approach Based on Fundamental Ethical Principles in International Law and World Religions (Penn Press 2003)Google Scholar
Lepard, BD, Customary International Law: A New Theory with Practical Applications (Cambridge University Press 2010)Google Scholar
Llewellyn, K & Hoebel, A, The Cheyenne Way Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence (University of Oklahoma Press 1941)Google Scholar
Locke, J, Two Treatise of Government (first published 1690, The New English Library 1963)Google Scholar
Luce, RD & Raiffa, H, Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey (Wiley 1957)Google Scholar
Maine, H, Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas (John Murray 1861)Google Scholar
Malinowski, B, A Scientific Theory of Culture (University of North Carolina Press 1944)Google Scholar
Margaritis, M, ‘Article 559’ in Kerameas, K, Kondilis, D & Nikas, N, Interpretation of the Code of Civil Procedure, Vol I, Articles 1–590 (Sakkoulas 2000) 1000Google Scholar
Marmor, A, ‘Meaning and Interpretation’ in Ziegler, K (ed), Interpretation and Legal Theory (Bloomsbury 2005) 9Google Scholar
Martin, C, ‘The UPR and Its Impact on the Protection Role of AICHR in Southeast Asia’ in Gomez, J & Ramcharan, R (eds), The Universal Periodic Review of Southeast Asia (Palgrave Macmillan 2018) 201Google Scholar
McCraw, B, ‘Appeal to Ignorance’ in Arp, R, Barbone, S & Bruce, M (eds), Bad Arguments:100 of the Most Important Fallacies in Western Philosophy (Wiley Blackwell 2019) 106Google Scholar
McCrudden, C, ‘Legal Research and the Social Sciences’ in Del Mar, M & Giudice, M (eds), Legal Theory and the Social Sciences Vol II (Routledge 2010) 633Google Scholar
Meguro, M, ‘Customary International Law and Non-State Actors: Between Anthropomorphism and Artificial Unity’ in Droubi, S and d’Aspremont, J (eds), International Organizations Non-State Actors, and the Formation of Customary International Law, Melland Schill Perspectives on International Law (Manchester University Press 2020)Google Scholar
Merkouris, P, Article 31(3)(c) VCLT and the Principle of Systemic Integration: Normative Shadows in Plato’s Cave (Brill Nijhoff 2015)Google Scholar
Merkouris, P, ‘Treaty Interpretation and its Rules: Of Motion Through Time, “Time-Will” and “Time-Bubbles”’ in Fitzmaurice, M & Merkouris, P (eds), Treaties in Motion (Cambridge University Press 2020) 121Google Scholar
Mileva, N & Fortuna, M, ‘Environmental Protection as an Object of and Tool for Evolutionary Interpretation’ in Abi-Saab, G et al (eds), Evolutionary Interpretation and International Law (Hart 2020) 123Google Scholar
Morgenthau, HJ & Thompson, KW, Politics Among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace (6th ed, Alfred A Knopf 1985)Google Scholar
Morss, JR, The Biologising of Childhood: Developmental Psychology and the Darwinian Myth (Erlbaum 1990)Google Scholar
Morss, JR, ‘Riddle of the Sands: Time, Power and Legitimacy in International Law’ in Singh, P & Mayer, B (eds), Critical International Law: Post-realism, Post-colonialism, and Transnationalism (Oxford University Press 2014) 53Google Scholar
Morss, JR, ‘Mars for the Martians? On the Obsolescence of Self-Determination’ in Tesón, FR (ed), The Theory of Self-Determination (Cambridge University Press 2016) 184Google Scholar
Müller, F, Discours de la méthode juridique (O Jouanjan tr, Presses Universitaires de France 1996)Google Scholar
Murphy, L, What Makes Law: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law (Cambridge University Press 2014)Google Scholar
Murphy, SD, ‘Codification, Progressive Development, or Scholarly Analysis? The Art of Packaging the ILC’s Work Product’ in Ragazzi, M (ed), The Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Martinus Nijhoff 2013) 29Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A, National Courts and the International Rule of Law (Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, N, ‘Conversations among Courts: Domestic and International Adjudicators’ in Romano, CPR, Alter, K & Shany, Y (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press 2013) 524Google Scholar
Oeser, E, Evolution and Constitution: The Evolutionary Self-Construction of Law (Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003)Google Scholar
Öhlinger, T, Die Anwendung des Völkerrechts auf Verträge im Bundesstaat (Braumüller 1982)Google Scholar
Onuf, N, World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations (USC Press 1989)Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, A, The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law (Oxford University Press 2008)Google Scholar
Orford, A, ‘International Law and the Limits of History’ in Werner, W et al (eds), The Law of International Lawyers: Reading Martti Koskenniemi (Cambridge University Press 2015) 297Google Scholar
Otto, D, ‘Feminist Approaches to International Law’ in Orford, A & Hoffmann, F (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law (Oxford University Press 2016) 488Google Scholar
Pagden, A & Lawrence, J (eds), Vitoria: Political Writings (Cambridge University Press 1991)Google Scholar
Pahuja, S, ‘Decolonization and the Eventness of International Law’ in Johns, F, Joyce, R & Pahuja, S (eds), Events: The Force of International Law (Routledge 2011) 91Google Scholar
Palombella, G, ‘Theory, Realities, and Promises of Inter-Legality, A Manifesto’ in Klabbers, J & Palombella, G (eds), The Challenge of Inter-Legality (Cambridge University Press 2019) 380Google Scholar
Paparinskis, M, The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment (Oxford University Press 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papaux, A & Samson, R, ‘Article 33’ in Corten, O & Klein, P (eds), The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Oxford University Press 2011) 868Google Scholar
Pascual-Vives, F, Consensus-Based Interpretation of Regional Human Rights Treaties (Brill Nijhoff 2019)Google Scholar
Paulson, SL, ‘Introduction’ in Paulson, SL & Litschewski Paulson, B (eds), Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes (Clarendon Press 1998) xliiiGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2003)Google Scholar
Peat, D & Windsor, M, ‘Introduction’ in Bianchi, A, Peat, D & Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford University Press 2018) 3Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘Article 38’ in Zimmermann, A et al (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2006) 750Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘Shaping the Future of International Law: The Role of the World Court in Law-Making’ in Arsanjani, MH et al (eds), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W Michael Reisman (Brill/Nijhoff 2011) 1065Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘Article 38’ in Zimmermann, A et al (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2012) 731Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘Les raisons du développement du soft law en droit international: choix ou nécessité?’ in Deumier, P & Sorel, JM (eds), Regards croisés sur la soft law en droit interne, européen et international (LGDJ 2018) 177Google Scholar
Pellet, A & Müller, D, ‘Article 38’ in Zimmermann, A et al (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2019) 914Google Scholar
Petersen, N, ‘The Role of Consent and Uncertainty in the Formation of Customary International Law’, in Lepard, BD (ed), Reexamining Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) 111Google Scholar
Piggott, L, ‘The “Bush Doctrine” and the Use of Force in International Law’ in Morgan, MJ (ed), The Impact of 9/11 and the New Legal Landscape: The Day that Changed Everything? (Palgrave Macmillan 2009) 241Google Scholar
Postema, GJ, ‘Custom in International Law: A Normative Practice Account’ in Perreau-Saussine, A & Murphy, JB (eds), The Nature of Customary Law: Legal, Historical, and Philosophical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2007) 279Google Scholar
Postema, G, ‘Conformity, Custom, and Congruence: Rethinking the Efficacy of Law’ in Kramer, MH, Grant, C, Colburn, B & Hatzistavrou, A (eds), The Legacy of HLA Hart: Legal, Political and Moral Philosophy (Oxford University Press 2008) 45Google Scholar
Ratner, S, The Thin Justice of International Law: A Moral Reckoning of the Law of Nations (Oxford University Press 2015)Google Scholar
Rauter, T, Judicial Practice, Customary International Criminal Law and Nullum Crimen Sine Lege (Springer 2017)Google Scholar
Raz, J, ‘Promises and Obligations’ in Raz, J & Hacker, PMS (eds), Law, Morality and Society: Essays in Honour of HLA Hart (Oxford University Press 1977) 223Google Scholar
Raz, J, The Concept of a Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 1980)Google Scholar
Raz, J, The Authority of Law. Essays on Law and Morality (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2009)Google Scholar
Roberts, A & Sivakumaran, S, ‘The Theory and Reality of the Sources on International Law’ in Evans, M (ed), International Law (Oxford University Press 2018) 89Google Scholar
Rockmore, T, ‘Hegel’ in Tucker, A (eds), A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography (Wiley-Blackwell 2011) 468Google Scholar
Ross, A, A Textbook of International Law: General Part (first published 1947, Longmans 2013)Google Scholar
Ross, A, On Law and Justice (Holtermann, JvH ed, Bindreiter U tr, Oxford University Press 2019)Google Scholar
Roughan, N, ‘Sources and the Normativity of International Law: From Validity to Justification’ in Besson, S & d’Aspremont, J (eds), The Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press 2017) 680Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C, ‘Imposing International Duties on Non-State Actors and the Legitimacy of International Law’ in Noortmann, M & Ryngaert, C (eds), Non-State Actor Dynamics in International Law: From Law-Takers to Law-Makers (Routledge 2010) 69Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C, ‘Non-State Actors in International Humanitarian Law’ in d’Aspremont, J (ed), Participants in the International Legal System: Multiple Perspectives on Non-State Actors in International Law (Routledge 2011) 284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryngaert, C, ‘Immunity from Execution and Diplomatic Property’ in Ruys, T, Angelet, N & Ferro, L (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Immunities and International Law (Cambridge University Press 2019) 285Google Scholar
Samuel, G, ‘Is Law Really a Social Science? A View from Comparative Law’ in Del Mar, M & Giudice, M (eds), Legal Theory and the Social Sciences Vol II (Routledge 2010) 178Google Scholar
Sandoz, Y et al (eds), Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (Martinus Nijhoff 1987)Google Scholar
Sands, P & Commission, J, ‘Treaty, Custom and Time: Interpretation/Application?’ in Fitzmaurice, M, Elias, O & Merkouris, P (eds), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of the Treaties: 30 Years On (Brill/Nijhoff 2010) 39Google Scholar
Sassòli, M, International Humanitarian Law: Rules, Controversies, and Solutions to Problems Arising in Warfare (Edward Elgar 2019)Google Scholar
Scelle, G, ‘Essai sur les sources formelles du droit international’ in Appleton, C (ed), Recueil Recueil d’études sur les sources du droit en l’honneur de François Gény. Tome III. Les sources des diverses branches du droit (Sirey 1934) 400Google Scholar
Scharf, M, Customary International Law in Times of Fundamental Change: Recognizing Grotian Moments (Cambridge University Press 2013)Google Scholar
Schauer, F, ‘Pitfalls in the Interpretation of Customary Law’ in Perreau-Saussine, A & Murphy, JB (eds), The Nature of Customary Law: Legal, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2007) 13Google Scholar
Schlütter, B, Developments in Customary International Law: Theory and the Practice of the International Court of Justice and the International Ad Hoc Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and Yugoslavia (Martinus Nijhoff 2010)Google Scholar
Schmalenbach, K, ‘Article 2’ in Dörr, O & Schmalenbach, K (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Springer 2018) 29Google Scholar
Schmalenbach, K, ‘Article 3’ in Dörr, O & Schmalenbach, K (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Springer 2018) 55Google Scholar
Schmitt, C, Der Begriff des Politischen: Text von 1932 mit einem Vorwort und drei Corollarien (Duncker & Humblot 1963)Google Scholar
Schmitt, C, Der Begriff des Politischen (first published 1932, 7th ed, Duncker & Humblot 1991)Google Scholar
Schmitt, MN, ‘The Law of Targeting’ in Wilmshurst, E & Breau, S (eds), Perspectives on the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press 2007) 131Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, G, The Inductive Approach to International Law (Oceana Publications 1965)Google Scholar
Scobbie, I, ‘The Approach to Customary International Law in the Study’ in Wilmshurst, E & Breau, S (eds), Perspectives on the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press 2007) 15Google Scholar
Searle, J, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge University Press 1969)Google Scholar
Seibert-Fohr, A, ‘Modern Concepts of Customary International Law as a Manifestation of a Value-Based International Order’ in Zimmermann, A & Hofmann, R (eds), Unity and Diversity in International Law (Duncker & Humblot 2006) 257Google Scholar
Sender, O & Wood, M, ‘Custom’s Bright Future: The Continuing Importance of Customary International Law’ in Bradley, CA (ed), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press 2016) 360Google Scholar
Sender, O & Wood, M, ‘The Emergence of Customary International Law: Between Theory and Practice’ in Brölmann, C & Radi, Y (eds), Handbook on the Theory and Practice of International Lawmaking (Edward Elgar 2016) 133Google Scholar
Simma, B, Das Reziprozitätselement in der Entstehung des Völkergewohnheitsrechts (Wilhelm Fink 1970)Google Scholar
Simma, B, Das Reziprozitätselement im Zustandekommen völkerrechtlicher Verträge (Duncker & Humblot 1972)Google Scholar
Sinclair, I, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (2nd ed, Manchester University Press 1984)Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, S, ‘Implementing Humanitarian Norms through Non-State Armed Groups’ in Krieger, H (ed), Inducing Compliance with International Humanitarian Law: Lessons from the African Great Lakes Region (Cambridge University Press 2015) 125Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, S, ‘The Addressees of Common Article 3’ in Clapham, A et al (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2015) 415Google Scholar
Skillen, JW, Recharging the American Experiment: Principled Pluralism for Genuine Civic Community (Baker 1994)Google Scholar
Smith, A, ‘Of Contract’ in Meek, RL, Raphael, DD & Stein, PG (eds), Lectures on Jurisprudence (Oxford University Press 1978) 176Google Scholar
Staubach, P, The Rule of Unwritten International Law: Customary Law, General Principles, and World Order (Routledge 2018)Google Scholar
Steinberg, RH, ‘Wanted – Dead or Alive: Realism in International Law’ in Dunoff, JL & Pollack, MA (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations (Cambridge University Press 2013) 146Google Scholar
Steinbruck Platiše, M, ‘The Development of the Immunities of International Organisations in Response to Domestic Contestations’ in Kanetake, M & Nollkaemper, A (eds), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference (Hart 2016) 67Google Scholar
Strati, A, ‘Greece and the Law of the Sea: A Greek Perspective’ in Chircop, A, Gerolymatos, A & Iatrides, JO (eds), The Aegean Sea after the Cold War (Macmillan 2000) 96Google Scholar
Suárez, F, De legibus ac Deo legislatore (first published 1612, Williams GL et al tr 1944)Google Scholar
Tamanaha, BZ, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2010)Google Scholar
Tancredi, A, ‘OMC et coutume(s)’ in Tomkiewicz, V (ed), Les sources et les normes dans le droit de l’OMC, Colloque de Nice des 24 et 25 juin 2010 (Pedone 2012) 81Google Scholar
Tanzi, A, ‘Le forme della codificazione e lo sviluppo progressivo del diritto internazionale’ in Nesi, G & Gargiulo, P (eds), Luigi Ferrari Bravo: Il diritto internazionale come professione (Editoriale Scientifica 2015) 152Google Scholar
Tarello, G, Diritto, enunciati, usi: Studi di teoria e metateoria del diritto (il Mulino 1974)Google Scholar
Tasioulas, J, ‘The Legitimacy of International Law’ in Besson, S & Tasioulas, J (eds), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford University Press 2010) 101Google Scholar
Tasioulas, J, ‘Custom, Jus Cogens, and Human Rights’, in Bradley, CA (ed), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press 2016) 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesón, F, ‘Fake Custom’ in Lepard, B (ed), Reexamining Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) 86Google Scholar
Thirlway, H, International Customary Law and Codification: An Examination of the Continuing Role of Custom in the Present Period of Codification of International Law (AW Sijthoff 1972)Google Scholar
Thucydides, , The Complete Writings of Thucydides: The Peloponnesian War (Random House 1951)Google Scholar
Tomka, P, ‘Customary International Law in the Jurisprudence of the World Court: The Increasing Relevance of Codification’ in Lijnzaad, L & Council of Europe (eds), The Judge and International Custom (Brill Nijhoff 2016) 2Google Scholar
Trachtman, J, ‘The Growing Obsolescence of Customary International Law’ in Bradley, CA (ed), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press 2016) 172Google Scholar
Treves, T, ‘International Law: Achievements and Challenges’ in Cardona Llorens, J (ed), Cursos Euromediterraneos Bancaja de Derecho Internacional, Vol 10 (Tirant lo Blanch 2006) 452Google Scholar
Trinidad, J, Self-Determination in Disputed Colonial Territories (Cambridge University Press 2018) 83Google Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, A & Methymaki, E, ‘Sources and the Enforcement of International Law: Domestic Courts-Another Brick in the Wall?’ in Besson, S & d’Aspremont, J (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press 2017) 813Google Scholar
Unger, R, The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Another Time. A Greater Task (Verso 2015)Google Scholar
Van der Burg, W, The Dynamics of Law and Morality: A Pluralist Account of Legal Interactionism (Ashgate 2014)Google Scholar
Van Eikema Hommes, HJ, Major Trends in the History of Legal Philosophy (North Holland 1979)Google Scholar
Van Steenberghe, R, ‘Non-State Actors from the Perspective of the International Committee of the Red Cross’ in d’Aspremont, J (ed), Participants in the International Legal System: Multiple Perspectives on Non-State Actors in International Law (Routledge 2011) 204Google Scholar
Van Woudenberg, R ‘Theories of Thing-Structures’ in Philosophical Foundations I Reader (International Masters in Christian Studies of Science and Society Program, VU Amsterdam 2006–7) 6Google Scholar
Van Woudenberg, R, ‘Theories of Modes of Being (Modalities)’ in Philosophical Foundations I Reader (International Masters in Christian Studies of Science and Society Program, VU Amsterdam 2006) 3Google Scholar
Venzke, I, How Interpretation Makes International Law: On Semantic Change and Normative Twists (Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar
Venzke, I, ‘Post-modern Perspectives on Orthodox Positivism’ in Kammerhofer, J & d’Aspremont, J (eds), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (Cambridge University Press 2014) 182Google Scholar
Verosta, S, Theorie und Realität von Bündnissen: Heinrich Lammasch, Karl Renner und Der Zweibund (1897–1914) (Europa Verlag 1971)Google Scholar
Villalpando, S, ‘Gli strumenti della codificazione del diritto internazionale nell’età della codificazione light’, in Annoni, A, Forlati, S & Salerno, F (eds), La codificazione nell’ordinamento internazionale e dell’unione europea (Editoriale Scientifica 2019) 259Google Scholar
Villiger, M, Customary International Law and Treaties: A Manual on the Theory and Practice of the Interrelation of Sources (2nd ed, Kluwer Law International 1997)Google Scholar
Villiger, M, Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Brill/Nijhoff 2008)Google Scholar
Virally, M, ‘The Sources of International Law’, in Sorensen, M (ed) Manual of Public International Law (St Martin’s Press 1968) 116Google Scholar
Waibel, M, ‘Principles of Treaty Interpretation: Developed for and Applied by National Courts’, in Aust, HP & Nolte, G (eds), The Interpretation of International Law by Domestic Courts: Uniformity, Diversity, Convergence (Oxford University Press 2016) 12Google Scholar
Waibel, M, ‘The Origins of Interpretive Canons in Domestic Legal Systems’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y & Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention? Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Kluwer Law International BV 2019) 25Google Scholar
White, H, Tropics of Discourses: Essays in Cultural Criticism (The Johns Hopkins University Press 1986)Google Scholar
White, M, ‘Addressing Human Rights Protection Gaps: Can the Universal Periodic Review Process Live Up to Its Promise?’ in Gomez, J & Ramcharan, R (eds) The Universal Periodic Review of Southeast Asia (Palgrave Macmillan 2018) 19Google Scholar
Willke, W, ‘The Autopoietic Theory of Law: Autonomy of Law and Contextual Transfer’ in Amselek, P & MacCormick, N (eds), Controversies About Law’s Ontology (Edinburgh University Press 1991) 108Google Scholar
Winter, SL, A Clearing in the Forest: Law, Life and Mind (The University of Chicago Press 2001)Google Scholar
Wolfram, S, ‘Coherence Theory of Truth’ in Honderich, T (ed), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (Oxford University Press 1995) 140Google Scholar
Zander, J, The Application of the Precautionary Principle in Practice: Comparative Dimensions (Cambridge University Press 2010)Google Scholar
Zarbiyev, F, ‘A Genealogy of Textualism in Treaty Interpretation’ in Bianchi, A, Peat, D & Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford University Press 2018) 251Google Scholar
Zemanek, K, ‘What is State Practice and Who Makes It?’ in Beyerlin, U et al (eds), Recht zwischen Umbruch und Bewahrung: Völkerrecht, Europarecht, Staatsrecht: Festschrift für Rudolf Bernhardt (Springer 1995) 289Google Scholar
Zweigert, E, ‘Introduction’ in Die Verfassung des Deutschen Reichs vom 11 August 1919 (J Bensheimer 1919)Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Abe, T, ‘ICJ Practice in Determining the Existence of Customary International Law’ (2019) 62 JYIL 274Google Scholar
Ago, R, ‘Droit des traités à la lumière de la Convention de Vienne’ (1971) 134 RdC 297Google Scholar
Alexandrowicz, CH, ‘The Juridical Expression of the Sacred Trust of Civilization’ (1971) 65 AJIL 149Google Scholar
Alfert, R, ‘Hostes Humani Generis: An Expanded Notion of US Counterterrorist Legislation’ (1992) 6 EmoryInt’lLRev 171Google Scholar
Allen, S, ‘Self-determination, the Chagos Archipelago Advisory Opinion and the Chagossians’ (2020) 69 ICLQ 203Google Scholar
Alvarez-Jiménez, A, ‘Methods for the Identification of Customary International Law in the International Court of Justice’s Jurisprudence: 2000–2009’ (2011) 60 ICLQ 681Google Scholar
Anzilotti, D, ‘Efficacia ed interpretazione dei trattati’ (1912) Rivista di diritto internazionale 520Google Scholar
Arajärvi, N, ‘The Requisite Rigour in the Identification of Customary International Law: A Look at the Reports of the Special Rapporteur of the International Law Commission’ (2017) 19(1) ICLR 9Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruíz, G, ‘The Normative Role of the General Assembly of the United Nations and the Declaration of Principles of Friendly Relations’ (1972) 137 RdC 419Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, G, ‘Fine prematura del ruolo preminente di studiosi italiani nel progetto di codificazione della responsabilità degli Stati: specie a proposito di crimini internazionali e dei poteri del Consiglio di sicurezza’ (1998) 71 RivDirInt 110Google Scholar
Arato, J, ‘Subsequent Practice and Evolutive Interpretation: Techniques of Treaty Interpretation over Time and Their Diverse Consequences’ (2010) 9 LPICT 443Google Scholar
Badar, ME, ‘Just Convict Everyone! Joint Perpetration from Tadić to Stakić and Back Again’ (2006) 6 Int CLR 293Google Scholar
Baker, R, ‘Customary International Law in the 21st Century: Old Challenges and New Debates’ (2010) 21(1) EJIL 173Google Scholar
Bangerter, O, ‘Reasons Why Armed Groups Choose to Respect International Humanitarian Law or Not’ (2011) 93 IRRC 353Google Scholar
Banteka, N, ‘A Theory of Constructive Interpretation for Customary International Law Identification’ (2018) 39(3) MichJIntlL 301Google Scholar
Bartels, L, ‘Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’ (2001) 35(3) JWT 499Google Scholar
Bassiouni, MC, ‘A Functional Approach to General Principles of International Law’ (1990) 11 MichJIntlL 767Google Scholar
Bates, E, ‘Avoiding Legal Obligations Created by Human Rights Treaties’ (2008) 57 ICLQ 751Google Scholar
Bates, E, ‘Sophisticated Constructivism in Human Rights Compliance Theory’ (2015) 25 EJIL 1169Google Scholar
Beaulac, S, ‘National Application of International Law: The Statutory Interpretation Perspective’ (2003) 41 CanYBIL 225Google Scholar
Bellal, A & Heffes, E, ‘“Yes, I Do”: Binding Armed Non-State Actors to IHL and Human Rights Norms through their Consent’ (2018) 12(1) HR&ILD 120Google Scholar
Bellinger III, JB & Haynes, II WJ, ‘A US Government Response to the International Committee of the Red Cross Study Customary International Humanitarian Law’ (2007) 89 IRRC 443Google Scholar
Bentivoglio, LM, ‘Interpretazione delle norme internazionali’ (1972) XXII Enciclopedia del diritto 310Google Scholar
Benvenisti, E & Downs, GW, ‘Comment on Nico Krisch, “The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods”’ (2014) 108 AJIL Unbound 1Google Scholar
Bernhardt, R, ‘Interpretation in International Law’ (1992) II Encyclopedia of Public International Law 1417Google Scholar
Besson, S, ‘State Consent and Disagreement in International Law-Making’ (2016) 29(2)LJIL 289Google Scholar
Betlem, G & Nollkaemper, A, ‘Giving Effect to Public International Law and European Community Law before Domestic Courts: A Comparative Analysis of the Practice of Consistent Interpretation’ (2003) 14 EJIL 569Google Scholar
Bleckmann, A, ‘Zur Feststellung und Auslegung von Völkergewohnheitsrecht’ (1977) 37 ZaöRV 504Google Scholar
Bleicher, S, ‘The Legal Significance of Re-Citation of General Assembly Resolutions’ (1969) 63 AJIL 444Google Scholar
Blokker, N, ‘International Organizations and Customary International Law: Is the International Law Commission Taking International Organizations Seriously?’ (2017) 14(1)IOLR 1Google Scholar
Blutman, L, ‘Conceptual Confusion and Methodological Deficiencies: Some Ways that Theories on Customary International Law Fail’ (2014) 25 (2)EJIL 529Google Scholar
Bodansky, D, ‘Customary (and Not So Customary) International Environmental Law’ (1995) 3 Global Legal Studies Journal 105Google Scholar
Bodansky, D, ‘The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law?’ (1999) 93(3)AJIL 596Google Scholar
Bohoslavsky, JP et al, ‘Emerging Customary International Law in Sovereign Debt Governance?’ (2014) 9 CMLJ 55Google Scholar
Bordin, FL, ‘A Glass Half Full? The Character, Function and Value of the Two-Element Approach to Identifying Customary International Law’ (2019) 21 ICLR 283Google Scholar
Brown Weiss, E, ‘International Environmental Law: Contemporary Issues and the Emergence of a New World Order’ (1993) 81 GeoLJ 675Google Scholar
Brunnée, J & Toope, C, ‘International Law and Constructivism: Elements of an Interactional Theory of International Law (2000) 39 ColumJTransnat’lL 19Google Scholar
Buchanan, A & Keohane, RO, ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions’ (2006) 20(4) Ethics and International Affairs 405Google Scholar
Buzzini, GP, ‘La théorie des sources face au droit international général: Réflexions sur l’émergence du droit objectif dans l’ordre juridique international’ (2002) 106 RGDIP 581Google Scholar
Cameron, AM, ‘Dooyeweerd on Law and Morality: Legal Ethics – a Test Case’ (1998) 28 Victoria UnivWelLawRev 263Google Scholar
Cannizzaro, E and Bonafé, B, ‘Fragmenting International Law through compromissory clauses? Some remarks on the decision of the ICJ in the Oil Platforms case’ (2005) 16(3)EJIL 481Google Scholar
Carty, A, ‘Scandinavian Realism and Phenomenological Approaches to Statehood and General Custom in International Law’ (2003) 14 EJIL 817Google Scholar
Carty, A, ‘The Need to be Rid of the Idea of General Customary Law’ (2018) AJIL Unbound 319Google Scholar
Cassese, A, ‘The Proper Limits of Individual Responsibility under the Doctrine of Joint Criminal Enterprise’ (2007) 5 JICJ 109Google Scholar
Cassimatis, A, ‘International Humanitarian Law, International Human Rights Law, and Fragmentation of International Law’ (2007) 56 ICLQ 623Google Scholar
Charlesworth, H, ‘Customary International Law and the Nicaragua Case’ (1984–87) 11 Aust YBIL 9Google Scholar
Charlesworth, H, ‘The Unbearable Lightness of Customary International Law’ (1998) 92 ASIL Proc 44Google Scholar
Charney, JI, ‘Is International Law Threatened by Multiple International Tribunals?’ (1998) 271 RdC 101Google Scholar
Chasapis Tassinis, O, ‘Customary International Law: Interpretation from Beginning to End’ (2020) 31 EJIL 235Google Scholar
Cheng, B, ‘United Nations Resolutions on Outer Space: “Instant” International Customary Law’ (1965) 5 IJIL 23Google Scholar
Chesterman, S, ‘Reforming the United Nations: Legitimacy, Effectiveness and Power After Iraq’ (2006) 10 SYBIL 59Google Scholar
Chiassoni, P, ‘La consuetudine internazionale: una ricognizione analitica’ (2014) 43 Ragion pratica 489Google Scholar
Chimni, BS, ‘Customary International Law: A Third World Perspective’ (2018) 112 AJIL 1Google Scholar
Chinkin, CM, ‘The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law’ (1989) 38 ICLQ 850Google Scholar
Cohan, JA, ‘The Bush Doctrine and the Emerging Norm of Anticipatory Self-Defense in Customary International Law’ (2003) 15(2)PaceInt’lLRev 283Google Scholar
Condorelli, L, ‘Consuetudine internazionale’ (1989) III Digesto delle discipline pubblicistiche 490Google Scholar
Cowan, J and Billaud, J, ‘Between Learning and Schooling: The Politics of Human Rights Monitoring at the Universal Periodic Review’ (2015) 36 TWQ 1175Google Scholar
Cowell, F, ‘Understanding the Legal Status of Universal Periodic Review Recommendations’ (2018) 7 CJIL 164Google Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘Multilateral Rights and Obligations in International Law’ (2006) 319 RdC 325Google Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘Chance, Order, Change: The Course of International Law’ (2013) 365 RdC 9Google Scholar
D’Amato, A, ‘Treaties as a Source of General Rules of International Law’ (1962) 3 HarvInt’lLJ 1Google Scholar
D’Amato, A, ‘Human Rights as Part of Customary International Law: A Plea for Change of Paradigms’ (1995) 25 AJIL 47Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, ‘The Foundations of the International Legal Order’ (2007) 18 FYBIL 219Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, ‘Softness in International Law: A Self-Serving Quest’ (2008) 19 EJIL 1075Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, ‘The Idea of “Rules” in the Sources of International Law’ (2014) 84 BYBIL 103Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, ‘The Decay of Modern Customary International Law in Spite of Scholarly Heroism’ (2015) 15(1) The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 9Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, ‘Expansion and the Sources of International Human Rights Law’ (2016) 46 IsrYBHumRts 223Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, ‘The International Court of Justice and the Irony of System-Design’ (2017) 8 JIDS 366Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, ‘The Four Lives of Customary International Law’ (2019) 21 IntCLRev 229Google Scholar
Darwall, S, ‘Authority and Reasons: Exclusionary and Second-Personal’ (2010) 120 Ethics 257Google Scholar
Daugirdas, K, ‘International Organizations and the Creation of Customary International Law’ (2020) 31 EJIL 201Google Scholar
David, SL, ‘A Foul Immigration Policy: US Misinterpretation of the Non-refoulement Obligation under the Convention against Torture’ (2003) 19 NYLSchJHumRts 769Google Scholar
De Burca, G, ‘Internalization of International Law by the CJEU and the US Supreme Court’ (2015) 13(4) IntJConstL 987Google Scholar
De Schutter, O, ‘Les mots de droit: une grammatologie critique du droit international public’ (1990) 6 RQDI 120Google Scholar
De Visscher, C, ‘Reflections on the Present Prospects of International Adjudication’ (1956) 50 AJIL 467Google Scholar
De Visscher, C, ‘Remarques sur l’interprétation dite textuelle des traités internationaux’ (1959) Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Internationaal Recht 383Google Scholar
De Wet, E, ‘The Prohibition of Torture as an International Norm of jus cogens and Its Implications for National and Customary Law’ (2004) 15(1)EJIL 97Google Scholar
DeBartolo, DM, ‘Identifying International Organizations’ Contributions to Custom’ (2014) 108 AJIL Unbound 174Google Scholar
Delacroix, S, ‘Hart’s and Kelsen’s Concepts of Normativity Contrasted’ (2004) 17 Ratio Juris 501Google Scholar
Deplano, R, ‘Assessing the Role of Resolutions in the ILC Draft Conclusions on Identification of Customary International Law: Substantive and Methodological Issues’ (2017) 14 (2)IOLR 227Google Scholar
Derrida, J, ‘Force de Loi: le ‘fondement mystique de l’autorité’ (1990) 11 CardozoLRev 920Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y, ‘The ICRC Customary International Humanitarian Law Study’ (2006) 36 IsrYBHumRts 1Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y, ‘The Interaction between Customary International Law and Treaties’ (2007) 322 RdC 295Google Scholar
Dolidze, A, ‘Bridging Comparative and International Law: Amicus Curiae Participation as a Vertical Legal Transplant’ (2016) 26 (4)EJIL 851Google Scholar
Dolzer, R, ‘New Foundations of the Law of Expropriation of Alien Property’ (1981) 75 AJIL 553Google Scholar
Dominguez-Redondo, E, ‘The Universal Periodic Review: Is There Life Beyond Naming and Shaming in Human Rights Implementation?’ (2012) 4 NZLRev 673Google Scholar
Dresselhaus, TR, Luck, J and Peabody, JW, ‘The Ethical Problem of False Positives: A Prospective Evaluation of Physician Reporting in the Medical Record’ (2002) 28 J Med Ethics 291Google Scholar
Dumberry, P, ‘Has the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Become a Rule of Customary International Law?’ (2017) 8 JIDS 155Google Scholar
Dupuy, PM, ‘The Danger of Fragmentation or Unification of the International Legal System and the International Court of Justice’ (1998-99) 31 NYUJIL&Pol 791Google Scholar
Dupuy, PM, ‘L’unité de l’ordre juridique international: cours général de droit international public’ (2002) 297 RdC 1Google Scholar
Duquet, S and Wouters, J, ‘De (on)beslagbaarheid van bankrekeningen van buitenlandse ambassades’ (2015) 16(38)Rechtskundig Weekblad 1483Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘The Identification and Character of Treaties and Treaty Obligations Between States in International Law’ (2002) 73 BYBIL 141Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘Dynamic (Evolutive) Interpretation of Treaties, Part I’ (2008) HYIL 101Google Scholar
Forbes, E & Morss, JR, ‘Peoplehood Obscured? The Normative Status of Self-Determination after the Chagos Advisory Opinion’ (2020) 46(3)Monash University Law Review 145Google Scholar
Forteau, M, ‘A New “Baxter Paradox”? Does the Work of the ILC on Matters Already Governed by Multilateral Treaties Necessarily Constitute a Dead End? Some Observations on the ILC Draft Articles on the Expulsion of Aliens’ (2016) HarvHumRtsJ 1Google Scholar
Fouchard, F, ‘Allowing “Leeway to Expediency, Without Abandoning Principle”? The International Court of Justice’s Use of Avoidance Techniques’ (2020) 33 LJIL 767Google Scholar
Frankowska, M, ‘The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties before United States Courts’ (1988) 28 VaJInt’lL 281Google Scholar
French, D, ‘Treaty Interpretation and the Incorporation of Extraneous Legal Rules’ (2006) 55 ICLQ 281Google Scholar
Frost, T and Murray, CRG, ‘Homeland: Reconceptualising the Chagossians’ Litigation’ (2020) 40(4 )OJLS 764Google Scholar
Gaja, G, ‘Trattati internazionali’ (1988) XV Digesto delle Discipline Pubblicistiche 344Google Scholar
Garner, JW, ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 4: Fiore’s Draft Code’ (1935) 29 AJIL Supp 1212Google Scholar
Gathii, JT, ‘TWAIL: A Brief History of Its Origins, Its Decentralized Network, and a Tentative Bibliography’ (2011) 3(1) Trade, Law & Development 26Google Scholar
Ghanea, N ‘From UN Commission on Human Rights to UN Human Rights Council: One Step Forwards or Two Steps Sideways’ (2006) 55 ICLQ 695Google Scholar
Gilmore, K, Mora, L, Barragues, A & Mikkelsen, I, ‘The Universal Periodic Review: A Platform for Dialogue, Accountability, and Change on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights’ (2015) 17 HHR Journal 167Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J and Posner, E, ‘A Theory of Customary International Law’ (1999) 66 UChiLRev 1113Google Scholar
Goodin, RE, ‘Institutionalizing the Public Interest: The Defense of Deadlock and Beyond’ (1996) 90 (2)APSR 331Google Scholar
Goodman, R, ‘Human Rights Treaties, Invalid Reservations, and State Consent’ 96(3) AJIL 531Google Scholar
Gouldner, AW, ‘The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement’ (1960) 25(2) AmerSociolRev 161Google Scholar
Gourgourinis, A, ‘The Distinction between Interpretation and Application of Norms in International Adjudication’ (2011) 2(1) JIDS 31Google Scholar
Gradoni, L, ‘Consuetudine internazionale e caso inconsueto’ (2012) Rivista di diritto internazionale 704Google Scholar
Green, JA, ‘Questioning the Peremptory Status of the Prohibition of the Use of Force’ (2011) 32 MichJIntlL 215Google Scholar
Greenwood, C, ‘The Applicability of International Humanitarian Law and the Law of Neutrality to the Kosovo Campaign’ (2002) 78 ILS 35Google Scholar
Grossman, N, ‘Legitimacy and International Adjudicative Bodies’ (2009) 41 GeoWashIntlLRev 107Google Scholar
Gunatilleke, G et al, ‘Do Recommendations to the Universal Peer Review Work? Examining Recommendations in UPR’s First Two Cycles for Nepal, Sri Lanka and Indonesia’ (2016) 2 Journal of Human Rights and Peace Studies 107Google Scholar
Gunning, I, ‘Modernizing Customary International Law: The Challenge of Human Rights’ (1990) 31 VaJInt’lL 211Google Scholar
Haan, V, ‘The Development of the Concept of Joint Criminal Enterprise at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’ (2005) 5 IntCLR 167Google Scholar
Hadjigeorgiou, A, ‘The Legacy of Sir Henry Maine in the 21st Century’ (2020) 34 Noesis 159Google Scholar
Hafner, G, ‘Some Thoughts on the State-Oriented and Individual-Oriented Approaches in International Law’ (2009) 14 ARIEL 27Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, J, ‘La doctrine des deux éléments du droit coutumier dans la pratique de la Cour internationale’ (1986) 90 RGDIP 5Google Scholar
Harvard Law School, ‘Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties, With Commentary’ (1935) 29 AJIL Supp 653Google Scholar
Haskell, JD, ‘TRAIL-ing TWAIL: Arguments and Blind Spots in Third World Approaches to International Law’ (2014) 27(2) CJLJ 383Google Scholar
Hays Parks, H, ‘Making Law of War Treaties: Lessons from Submarine Warfare Regulation’ (2000) 75 IntlLStudies 339Google Scholar
Hébié, M, ‘Was There Something Missing in the Decolonization Process in Africa? The Territorial Dimension’ (2015) 28 LJIL 529Google Scholar
Helfer, LR and Wuerth, IB, ‘Customary International Law: An Instrument Choice Perspective’ (2016) 37(4) MichJIntlL 563Google Scholar
Heller, KJ, ‘Specially-Affected States and the Formation of Custom’ (2018) 112 AJIL 191Google Scholar
Hiemstra, H & Nohle, E, ‘The Role of Non-State Armed Groups in the Development and Interpretation of International Humanitarian Law’ (2019) 20 Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 3Google Scholar
Higgins, R ‘The Development of International Law by the Political Organs of the United Nations’ (1965) 59 Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting 116Google Scholar
Hill, D, ‘Avoiding obligation: Reservations to Human Rights Treaties’ (2016) 60 Journal of Conflict Resolution 1129Google Scholar
Holtermann, JvH, ‘A Straw Man Revisited: Resettling the Score Between HLA Hart and Scandinavian Legal Realism’ (2017) 57 Santa Clara LRev 1Google Scholar
Hong, MH, ‘Legal Commitments to United Nations Human Rights Treaties and Higher Monitoring Standards in the Universal Periodic Review’ (2018) 17 Journal of Human Rights 660Google Scholar
Hoogers, G & Karapetian, G, ‘Federal Disputes in the German Reich under the Weimar Constitution: Lessons in Dispute Settlement for the Kingdom of the Netherlands’ (2018) 12 (3)Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law 257Google Scholar
Jahoon Lee, L, ‘Barcelona Traction in the 21st Century: Revisiting its Customary and Policy Underpinnings 35 years Later’ (2006) 42 StanJIntlL 237Google Scholar
Jervis, CEM, ‘Jurisdictional Immunities Revisited: An Analysis of the Procedure Substance Distinction in International Law’ (2019) 30(1) EJIL 105Google Scholar
Joyner, C, ‘UN General Assembly Resolutions and International Law: Rethinking the Contemporary Dynamics of Norm-Creation’ (1981) 11 CalWInt’lLJ 445Google Scholar
Joyner, DH, ‘Why I Stopped Believing in Customary International Law’ (2019) 9 Asian JIL 31Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J, ‘Uncertainty in the Formal Sources of International Law: Customary International Law and Some of its Problems’ (2004) 15 EJIL 523Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J, ‘Gaps, the Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion and the Structure of International Legal Argument between Theory and Practice’ (2010) 80 BYBIL 333Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J, ‘Taking the Rules of Interpretation Seriously, but not Literally? A Theoretical Reconstruction of Orthodox Dogma’ (2017) 86 NordJIntlL 125Google Scholar
Karnavas, MG, ‘Joint Criminal Enterprise at the ECCC: A Critical Analysis of the Pre-Trial Chamber’s Decision against the Application of JCE III and Two Divergent Commentaries on the Same’ (2010) 21 Crim LF 445Google Scholar
Kelsen, H, ‘Théorie du Droit International Coutumier’ (1939) 1 Revue Internationale de Theorie du Droit 253Google Scholar
Kelsen, H, ‘The Principle of Sovereign Equality of States as a Basis for International Organization’ (1944) 53(2) Yale LJ 207Google Scholar
Kerwin, GJ, ‘The Role of United Nations General Assembly Resolutions in Determining Principles of International Law in United States Courts’ (1983) Duke LJ 876Google Scholar
Kitharidis, S, ‘The Power of Article 103 of the UN Charter on Treaty Obligations’ (2016) 20 IP 111Google Scholar
Klabbers, J, ‘Shrinking Self-Determination: The Chagos Opinion of the International Court of Justice’ (2019) 8(2) ESIL Reflections <https://bit.ly/3GPgTX5>Google Scholar
Kleczkowska, A, ‘Searching for Armed Non-State Actors’ Role in the Process of Formation of Customary Law’ (2019) 19 ICLR 97Google Scholar
Kleffner, JK, ‘The Applicability of International Humanitarian Law to Organized Armed Groups’ (2011) 93 IRRC 443Google Scholar
Kleinlein, T, ‘International Legal Thought: Creation of a Tradition and the Potential of Disciplinary Self-Reflection’ (2016) 16(1) The Global Community: Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 811Google Scholar
Kolb, R, ‘Selected Problems in the Theory of Customary International Law’ (2003) 50 NILR 119Google Scholar
Kolodny, N & Wallace, RJ, ‘Promises and Practices Revisited’ (2005) 31(2) Phil&PubAff 119Google Scholar
Komanovics, A, ‘The Human Rights Council and the Universal Periodic Review: Is it More Than a Public Relations Exercise?’ (2012) 150 Studia Iuridica Auctoritate Universitatis Pecs Publicata 119Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M, ‘Introductory Note: International Court of Justice: Order Discontinuing the Proceedings in Case Concerning Passage Through the Great Belt (Finland v Denmark)’ (1993) 32 ILM 101Google Scholar
Krisch, N, ‘International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the Shaping of the International Legal Order’ 16(3) EJIL (2005) 369Google Scholar
Krisch, N, ‘The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods’ (2014) 108(1) AJIL 1Google Scholar
Kritsiotis, D, ‘Reappraising Policy Objections to Humanitarian Intervention’ (1998) 19(4) MichJIntlL 1005Google Scholar
Krivokapić, B, ‘On the Issue of So-Called “Instant” Customs in International Law’ (2017) 9 Acta Universitatis Danubius. Administratio 91Google Scholar
Lamond, G, ‘Legal Sources, the Rule of Recognition, and Customary Law’ (2014) 59 American Journal of Jurisprudence 25Google Scholar
Langille, B, ‘It’s “Instant Custom”: How the Bush Doctrine Became Law after the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001’ (2003) 26 BC Int’l&CompLRev 145Google Scholar
Lau, H, ‘Rethinking the Persistent Objector Doctrine in International Human Rights Law’ (2005) 6 ChinJIntLaw 495Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, ‘Decisions of Municipal Courts as a Source of International Law’ (1929) 10 BYBIL 65Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, ‘The Nature of International Law and General Jurisprudence’ (1932) 37 Economica 301Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, ‘Les travaux préparatoires et l’interprétation des traités’ (1934) 48 RdC 709Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, D, ‘(Dis)solving the Chronological Paradox in Customary International Law: A Hartian Approach’ (2008) 21(1) CJLJ 129Google Scholar
Lennard, M, ‘Navigating by the Stars: Interpreting the WTO Agreements’ (2002) 5(1) JIntlEconL 17Google Scholar
Lepard, B, ‘“Customary International Law: A Third World Perspective”: Reflections in Light of an Approach to CIL Based on Fundamental Ethical Principles’ (2018) 112 AJIL Unbound 303Google Scholar
Lerum, K, McCurtis, K, Saunders, P & Wahab, S, ‘Using Human Rights to Hold the US Accountable for its Anti-Sex Trafficking Agenda: The Universal Periodic Review and New Directions for US Policy’ (2012) 1 Anti-Trafficking Review 80Google Scholar
Lillich, RB, ‘The Growing Importance of Customary International Human Rights’ (1995) 25 Ga JInt’l&CompL 1Google Scholar
Lippold, M, ‘Reflections on Custom Critique and on Functional Equivalents in the Work of Jean d’Aspremont’ (2019) 21 IntCLRev 257Google Scholar
Loschin, L, ‘The Persistent Objector and Customary Human Rights Law: A Proposed Analytical Framework’ (1996) 2 UCDavis JInt’l L&Pol’y 147Google Scholar
MacCormick, N, ‘Voluntary Obligations and Normative Powers I’ (1972) 46 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 59Google Scholar
Marceau, G, ‘A Call for Coherence in International Law: Praises for the Prohibition Against “Clinical Isolation” in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (1999) 33(5) JWT 87Google Scholar
Marceau, G, ‘Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions: The Relationship between the WTO Agreement and MEAs and Other Treaties’ (2001) 35(6) JWT 1081Google Scholar
Marceau, G, ‘Fragmentation in International Law: The Relationship between WTO Law and General International Law – A Few Comments from a WTO Perspective’ (2006) 17 FYBIL 6Google Scholar
Mayer, B, ‘Climate Assessment as an Emerging Obligation Under Customary International Law’ (2019) 68 ICLQ 271Google Scholar
Marek, K, ‘Le probleme des sources du droit international dans l’arrêt sur le plateau continental de la mer du nord’ (1970) 6 RBDI 45Google Scholar
McFarland, S & Mathews, M, ‘Who Cares About Human Rights?’ (2005) 26(3) Political Psychology 365Google Scholar
Meguro, M, ‘Distinguishing the Legal Bindingness and Normative Content of Customary International Law’ (2017) 6(11) ESIL Reflections <https://esil-sedi.eu/post_name-1149/>Google Scholar
Meijers, H, ‘How is International Law Made? The Stages of Growth of International Law and the Use of Its Customary Rules’ (1978) 9 NYIL 1Google Scholar
Mejía-Lemos, DG, ‘On Self-Reflectivity, Performativity and Conditions for Existence of Sources of Law in International Law’ (2014) 57 GYIL 289Google Scholar
Mendelson, M, ‘The Subjective Element in Customary International Law’ (1995) 66 BYBIL 177Google Scholar
Miles, C, ‘Thoughts on Domestic Adjudication and the Identification and Formation of Customary International Law’ (2017) 27 IYIL 163Google Scholar
Milewicz, K & Goodin, R, ‘Deliberative Capacity Building through International Organizations: The Case of the Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights’ (2018) 48 BJPolS 513Google Scholar
Monaco, R, ‘Interpretazione’ (1988) VIII Enciclopedia Giuridica 2 Moore, MS, ‘Authority, Law, and Razian Reasons’ (1988) 62 S CalLRev 827Google Scholar
Morelli, G, ‘A proposito di norme internazionali cogenti’ (1968) Rivista di diritto internazionale 108Google Scholar
Morss, JR ‘Description Without Apology? On Structures, Signs and Subjectivity in International Legal Scholarship’ (2018) 58 IJIL 235Google Scholar
Morss, JR, ‘Pluralism, Peoplehood and Political Theology in International Legal Scholarship’ (2018) 27(1) GLR 77Google Scholar
Morss, JR, ‘Cutting Global Justice Down to Size? Rights, Vulnerabilities, Immunities, Communities’ (2019) 40(30) Liverpool LR 179Google Scholar
Morss, JR, ‘Book Review: Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law by James Crawford and International Law by Gleider Hernández’ (2020) 21(1) MJIL 1Google Scholar
Müller, T, ‘Customary Transnational Law: Attacking the Last Resort of State Sovereignty’ (2008) 15 IndJ Global Legal Studies 19Google Scholar
Murphy, SD, ‘Identification of Customary International Law and Other Topics: The Sixty-Seventh Session of the International Law Commission’ (2015) 109 AJIL 822Google Scholar
Murphy, SD, ‘Immunity Ratione Materiae of State Officials from Foreign Criminal Jurisdiction: Where is the State Practice in Support of Exceptions?’ (2018) 112 AJIL Unbound 4Google Scholar
Murray, D, ‘How International Humanitarian Law Treaties Bind Non-State Armed Groups’ (2015) 20 JC&SL 101Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘How to Identify Customary International Law? On the Outcome of the Work of the International Law Commission (2018)’ (2019) 62 JYIL 251Google Scholar
Norman, G and Trachtman, JP, ‘The Customary International Law Game’ (2005) 99(3) AJIL 541Google Scholar
Norton, PM, ‘A Law of the Future or a Law of the Past? Modern Tribunals and the International Law of Expropriation’ (1991) 85 AJIL 474Google Scholar
Nouwen, SMH, ‘Return to Sender: Let the International Court of Justice Justify or Qualify International-Criminal-Court Exceptionalism Regarding Personal Immunities’ (2019) 78(3) CLJ 596Google Scholar
Noyes, JE, ‘The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea’ (1999) 32 Cornell Int’lLJ 109Google Scholar
Öberg, M, ‘The Legal Effects of Resolutions of the UN Security Council and General Assembly in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ’ (2006) 16 EJIL 879Google Scholar
Ochoa, C, ‘The Individual and Customary International Law Formation’ (2007) 48 VaJInt’lL 119Google Scholar
Odermatt, J, ‘The Development of Customary International Law by International Organizations’ (2017) 66 ICLQ 491Google Scholar
Ohlin, JD, ‘Three Conceptual Problems with the Doctrine of Joint Criminal Enterprise’ (2007) 5 JICJ 69Google Scholar
Omorogbe, EY, ‘The Crisis of International Criminal Law in Africa: A Regional Regime in Response?’ (2019) 66(2) NILR 287Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, A, ‘The Acts of the Security Council: Meaning and Standards of Review’ (2007) 11 UNYB 149Google Scholar
Orford, A, ‘On International Legal Method’ (2013) 1 London Review of International Law 166Google Scholar
Papadaki, M, ‘Compromissory Clauses as the Gatekeepers of the Law to be “Used” in the ICJ and the PCIJ’ (2014) 5 JIDS 569Google Scholar
Paparinskis, M, ‘MFN Clauses and International Dispute Settlement: Moving beyond Maffezini and Plama?’ (2011) 26(2) ICSID Review 14Google Scholar
Parra, AR, ‘The Convention and Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes’ (2014) 374 RdC 313Google Scholar
Paulus, AL and Simma, B, ‘The Responsibility of Individuals for Human Rights Abuses in Internal Conflicts: A Positivist View’ (1999) 93(2) AJIL 302Google Scholar
Paust, JJ, ‘The Complex Nature, Sources and Evidences of Customary Human Rights’ (1995/1996) 25 GaJInt’l&CompL 147Google Scholar
Pavel, C and Lefkowitz, D, ‘Skeptical Challenges to International Law’ (2018) 13(8) Philosophy Compass 1Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘The Normative Dilemma: Will and Consent in International Law-Making’ (1989) 12 Aust YBIL 22Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘L’adaptation du droit international aux besoins changeants de la société internationale’ (2007) 329 RdC 9Google Scholar
Perry, SR, ‘Second-Order Reasons, Uncertainty and Legal Theory’ (1989) 62 SCalLRev 913Google Scholar
Peters, A, ‘Global Constitutionalism Revisited’ (2005) 11 International Legal Theory 39Google Scholar
Peters, A, ‘Precommitment Theory Applied to International Law: Between Sovereignty and Triviality’ (2008) 2008(1) UIllLRev 239Google Scholar
Petersen, N, ‘Customary Law Without Custom? Rules, Principles, and the Role of State Practice in International Norm Creation’ (2007) 32 AmUInt’lLRev 275Google Scholar
Petersen, N, ‘The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Process of Identifying Customary International Law’ (2017) 28(2)EJIL 357Google Scholar
Pillai, P, ‘The African Union, the International Criminal Court, and the International Court of Justice: At the Fault Lines of International Accountability’ (2018) 22(10) ASIL Insights <https://bit.ly/3te9eOs>Google Scholar
Posner, E, ‘Do States Have a Moral Obligation to Obey International Law?’ (2003) 55(5) Stan L Rev 1901Google Scholar
Qin, X, ‘Oral International Agreement and China’s Relevant Practice’ (2005) 4(2) Chinese Journal of International Law 465Google Scholar
Raz, J, ‘The Problem of Authority: Revisiting the Service Conception’ (2006) 90 MinnLRev 1003Google Scholar
Roberts, A, ‘Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation’ (2001) 95 AJIL 757Google Scholar
Roberts, R, ‘The Equal Application of the Laws of War: A Principle under Pressure’ (2008) 90 IRRC 931Google Scholar
Roberts, A, ‘Comparative International Law? The Role of National Courts in Creating and Enforcing International Law’ (2011) 60 ICLQ 57Google Scholar
Roberts, A & Sivakumaran, S, ‘Lawmaking by Nonstate Actors: Engaging Armed Groups in the Creation of International Humanitarian Law’ (2012) 37 YaleJInt’lL 107Google Scholar
Rondeau, S, ‘Participation of Armed Groups in the Development of the Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts’ (2011) 93 IRRC 649Google Scholar
Rouillard, LPF, ‘Misinterpreting the Prohibition of Torture Under International Law: The Office of Legal Counsel Memorandum’ (2005) 21(1) AmUInt’lLRev 9Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C, ‘Embassy Bank Accounts and State Immunity from Execution: Doing Justice to the Financial Interests of Creditors’ (2013) 26 LJIL 73Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C & Hora Siccama, D, ‘Ascertaining Customary International Law: An Inquiry into the Methods Used by Domestic Courts’ (2018) 65 NILR 1Google Scholar
SáCouto, S, Sadat, LN & Viseur Sellers, P, ‘Collective Criminality and Sexual Violence: Fixing a Failed Approach’ (2020) 33(1) LJIL 207Google Scholar
Salama, I, ‘Proliferation of Treaty Bodies or Expansion of Protection?’ (2011) 105 ASIL Proc 515Google Scholar
Sassòli, M, ‘Transnational Armed Groups and International Humanitarian Law’ (2006) Winter 2006(6) HPCR Occasional Paper Series 1 <https://bit.ly/3oW3F4Y>>Google Scholar
Sassòli, M, ‘Taking Armed Groups Seriously: Ways to Improve their Compliance with International Humanitarian Law’ (2010) 1 JIHLS 5Google Scholar
Sassòli, M, ‘Introducing a Sliding-Scale of Obligations to Address the Fundamental Inequality between Armed Groups and States?’ (2011) 93 IRRC 426Google Scholar
Scanlon, TM, ‘The Significance of Choice’ (1986) 7 The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 149Google Scholar
Scarfi, JP, ‘Denaturalizing the Monroe Doctrine: The Rise of Latin American Legal Anti-Imperialism in the Face of the Modern US and Hemispheric Redefinition of the Monroe Doctrine’ (2020) 33(3) LJIL 541Google Scholar
Schachter, O, ‘The Invisible College of International Lawyers’ (1977–1978) 72 NWULR 217Google Scholar
Schneider, H & Schaumann, W, ‘Verträge zwischen Gliedstaaten im Bundesstaat’ (1961) 19 Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer 122Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E, ‘Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik’ (1935) 23(49)Die Naturwissenschaften 807Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, G, ‘The Inductive Approach to International Law’ (1947) 60 HarvLRev 539Google Scholar
Schwebel, S, ‘The Effect of Resolutions of the UN General Assembly on Customary International Law’ (1979) 73 ASIL Proc 301Google Scholar
Shaffer, G & Ginsburg, T, ‘The Empirical Turn in International Legal Scholarship’ (2012) 106 AJIL 1Google Scholar
Shany, Y, ‘Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: A Goal-Based Approach’ (2012) 106(2) AJIL 225Google Scholar
Sinha, SP, ‘Perspective of the Newly Independent States on the Binding Quality of International Law’ (1965) 14 ICLQ 121Google Scholar
Slaughter Burley, AM, ‘International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda’ (1993) 87 AJIL 205Google Scholar
Somek, A, ‘From the Rule of Law to the Constitutionalist Makeover: Changing European Conceptions of Public International Law’ (2011) 18(4) Constellations 576Google Scholar
Somer, J, ‘Jungle Justice: Passing Sentence on the Equality of Belligerents in Non-International Armed Conflict’ (2007) 89 IRRC 655Google Scholar
Sur, S, ‘La créativité du droit international cours général de droit international public’ (2013) 363 RdC 18Google Scholar
Suttle, O, ‘Rules and Values in International Adjudication: The Case of the WTO Appellate Body’ (2019) 68(2) ICLQ 399Google Scholar
Swaine, ET, ‘Identifying Customary International Law: First Thoughts on the ILC’s First Steps’ (2014) 108 AJIL Unbound 184Google Scholar
Tallberg, J & Zürn, M, ‘The Legitimacy and Legitimation of International Organizations: Introduction and Framework’ (2019) 14 The Review of International Organizations 581Google Scholar
Talmon, S, ‘Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion’ (2015) 26(2) EJIL 417Google Scholar
Tams, CJ, ‘Meta-Custom and the Court: A Study in Judicial Law-Making’ (2015) 14 LPICT 51Google Scholar
Tasioulas, J, ‘Opinio Juris and the Genesis of Custom: A Solution to the “Paradox”’ (2007) 26 Aust YBIL 199Google Scholar
Tasioulas, J, ‘Customary International Law: A Moral Judgment-Based Account’ (2014) 108 AJIL Unbound 328Google Scholar
Terman, R & Voeten, E, ‘The Relational Politics of Shame: Evidence from the Universal Periodic Review (2018) 13 The Review of International Organizations 1Google Scholar
Thirlway, H, ‘Human Rights in Customary Law: An Attempt to Define Some of the Issues’ (1995) 28 LJIL 495Google Scholar
Thirlway, H, ‘Professor Baxter’s Legacy: Still Paradoxical?’ (2017) 6(3) ESIL Reflections <https://esil-sedi.eu/post_name-121/>Google Scholar
Thirlway, H, ‘The Role of Non-State Actors: A Response to Professor Ryngaert’ (2017) 64 NILR 141Google Scholar
Tladi, D, ‘The International Law Commission’s Recent Work on Exceptions to Immunity: Charting the Course for a Brave New World in International Law?’ (2019) 32 NJIL 169Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C, ‘Obligations Arising for States Without or Against Their Will’ (1993) 241 RdC 195Google Scholar
Trachtman, J, ‘Persistent Objectors, Cooperation, and the Utility of Customary International Law’ (2010) 21 DukeJComp&Int’lL 221Google Scholar
Treves, T, ‘Fragmentation of International Law: The Judicial Perspective’ (2007) 23 Comunicazioni e Studi 821Google Scholar
Trimble, PR, ‘The Supreme Court and International Law: The Demise of Restatement Section 403’ (1995) 89(1) AJIL 53Google Scholar
Truyol y Serra, A, ‘Théorie du Droit International Public: Cours Général’ (1981) 173 RdC 9Google Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, A, ‘Domestic Courts in International Law: The International Judicial Function of National Courts’ (2011) 34 LoyLAInt’l&CompLRev 135Google Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, A & Tams, CJ, ‘Introduction: Domestic Courts as Agents of Development of International Law’ (2013) 26 LJIL 531Google Scholar
Upton, H ‘The Human Rights Council: First Impressions and Future Challenges’ (2007) 7 HRLR 29Google Scholar
Van der Wilt, H, ‘National Law: A Small but Neat Utensil in the Toolbox of International Criminal Tribunals’ (2010) 10 Int CLR 209Google Scholar
Verdier, PH & Voeten, E, ‘Precedent, Compliance, and Change in Customary International Law: An Explanatory Theory’ (2014) 108(3) AJIL 389Google Scholar
Verdross, A, ‘Entstehungsweisen und Geltungsgrund des universellen völkerrechtlichen Gewohnheitsrechts’ (1969) 29 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 635Google Scholar
Verhoeven, J, ‘Considérations sur ce qui est commun: Cours général de droit international public’ (2008) 334 RdC 9Google Scholar
Villalpando, S, ‘On the International Court of Justice and the Determination of Rules of Law’ (2013) 26 LJIL 243Google Scholar
Virally, M, ‘Panorama du droit international contemporain: cours général de droit international public’ (1983) 183 RdC 9Google Scholar
Voyiakis, E, ‘A Disaggregative View of Customary International Law-Making’ (2016) 29 LJIL 365Google Scholar
Walzer, M, ‘The Moral Standing of States: A Response to Four Critics’ (1980) 9(3) Philosophy and Public Affairs 209Google Scholar
Weatherall, T, ‘Jus Cogens and Sovereign Immunity: Reconciling Divergence in Contemporary Jurisprudence’ (2015) 46 GeorgetJIntLaw 1151Google Scholar
Weisburd, AM, ‘Customary International Law: The Problem of Treaties’ (1988) 21 VandJTransnat’lL 1Google Scholar
Widdows, K, ‘On the Form and Distinctive Nature of International Agreements’ (1981) 7(1) Australian YBIL 114Google Scholar
Wiener, JB, ‘Something Borrowed for Something Blue: Legal Transplants and the Evolution of Global Environmental Law’ (2001) 27 Ecology LQ 1295Google Scholar
Wolfke, K, ‘Some Persistent Controversies Regarding Customary International Law’ (1993) 24 NYIL 1Google Scholar
Wood, M, ‘The Present Position within the ILC on the Topic “Identification of Customary International Law”: In Partial Response to Sienho Yee, Report on the ILC Project on “Identification of Customary International Law”’ (2016) 15 ChinJIntLaw 3Google Scholar
Wood, M, ‘The Interpretation of Security Council Resolutions, Revisited’ (2017) 20 UNYB 1Google Scholar
Wood, M & Sender, O, ‘Identifying the Rules for Identifying Customary International Law: Response from Michael Wood and Omri Sender’ (2014) 108 AJIL Unbound 198Google Scholar
Yasseen, MK, ‘L’interprétation des traités d’après la convention de Vienne sur le droit des traités’ (1976) 151 RdC 1Google Scholar
Ziccardi, P, ‘La consuetudine internazionale nella teoria delle fonti giuridiche’ (1958) Comunicazioni e studi 190Google Scholar
Ziccardi, P, ‘Consuetudine (diritto internazionale)’ (1961) IX Enciclopedia del diritto 476Google Scholar
Zürn, M, ‘Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems’ (2004) 39(2) Government and Opposition 260Google Scholar
Barkholdt, J & Kulaga, J, ‘Analytical Presentation of the Comments and Observations by States on Draft Article 7, paragraph 1, of the ILC Draft Articles on Immunity of State Officials from Foreign Criminal Jurisdiction, United Nations General Assembly, Sixth Committee, 2017’ (April 2018) KFG Working Paper Series No 14 <https://bit.ly/3AxOdhx>>Google Scholar
Bellal, A & Casey-Maslen, S, ‘Rules of Engagement, Protecting Civilians through Dialogue with Armed Non-State Actors’ (Geneva Academy of IHL and Human Rights, 2011) <https://bit.ly/3DAwiZK>>Google Scholar
Bellal, A, Bongard, P & Heffes, E, ‘Research Brief: From Words to Deeds: A Study of Armed Non-State Actors: Practice and Interpretation of International Humanitarian and Human Rights Norms’ (Geneva Academy of IHL and Human Rights, December 2019) <https://bit.ly/3lzwCl7>>Google Scholar
Cress, K, ‘Preliminary Observations on the ICC Appeals Chamber’s Judgment of 6 May 2019 in the Jordan Referral re Al-Bashir Appeal’ (2019) TOAEP’s Occasional Paper SeriesGoogle Scholar
Kahombo, B, ‘Africa Within the Justice System of the International Criminal Court: The Need for a Reform’ (May 2016) KFG Working Paper Series No 2 <http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3129009>>Google Scholar
McMahon, E, ‘The Universal Periodic Review: A Work in Progress: An Evaluation of the First Cycle of the New UPR Mechanism of the United Nations Human Rights Council’ (Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Dialogue on Globalization, September 2012)Google Scholar
Purcell, K, ‘Faltering at the Critical Turn to History: “Juridical Thinking” in International Law and Genealogy as History, Critique, and Therapy’ (2016) Jean Monnet Working Paper Series, JMWP 02/15Google Scholar
Sadat, LN, ‘Heads of State and Other Government Officials Before the International Criminal Court: The Uneasy Revolution Continues’ (2019) Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No 19-01-12 <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3321998>>Google Scholar
Sassòli, M, ‘Transnational Armed Groups and International Humanitarian Law’ (2006) Winter 2006(6) HPCR Occasional Paper Series 1 <https://bit.ly/3oW3F4Y>>Google Scholar
Skillen, JW, ‘Development of Calvinistic Political Theory in the Netherlands, With Special Reference to the Thought of Herman Dooyeweerd’ (PhD Thesis, Duke University 1973)Google Scholar
Van Woudenberg, R, ‘Theories of Thing-Structures’ in Philosophical Foundations I Reader (International Masters in Christian Studies of Science and Society Program, Vrije Universitet Amsterdam 2006–7)Google Scholar
Akande, D, ‘ICC Appeals Chamber Holds that Heads of State Have No Immunity Under Customary International Law Before International Tribunals’ (EJIL: Talk!, 6 May 2019) <https://bit.ly/3iU7sMz>>Google Scholar
Ammann, O, ‘On the Interpretability of Customary International Law: A Response to Nina Mileva and Marina Fortuna’ (Opinio Juris Blog, 7 October 2019) <https://bit.ly/3v7sJr2>>Google Scholar
Bachand, R, ‘L’interprétation en droit international: une analyse par les contraintes’ (Société européenne de droit international, 2007) <https://esil-sedi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Bachand.pdf>>Google Scholar
Bellal, A & Casey-Maslen, S, ‘Rules of Engagement, Protecting Civilians through Dialogue with Armed Non-State Actors’ (Geneva Academy of IHL and Human Rights, 2011) <https://bit.ly/3DAwiZK>>Google Scholar
Bellal, A, Bongard, P & Heffes, E, ‘Research Brief: From Words to Deeds: A Study of Armed Non-State Actors’ Practice and Interpretation of International Humanitarian and Human Rights Norms’ (Geneva Academy of IHL and Human Rights, December 2019) <https://bit.ly/3lzwCl7>>Google Scholar
Branca, E, ‘“Yet, it moves … ”: The Dynamic Evolution of State immunity in the “Comfort Women” case’ (EJILTalk!, 7 April 2021) <https://bit.ly/3GLpkm7>>Google Scholar
Cisney, WV, ‘Differential Ontology’ (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2021) <www.iep.utm.edu/diff-ont/>>Google Scholar
Dickson, J, ‘Interpretation and Coherence in Legal Reasoning’ (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2016) <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-reas-interpret/>>Google Scholar
Dupuy, PM, ‘Intergenerational Reflections on International Law’ (EJIL: Talk!, January 2020) <https://bit.ly/3sbh9M1>>Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F, ‘The History at the End of History’ (Guardian, 3 April 2007) <https://bit.ly/2ZEKDpK>>Google Scholar
Geneva Call, ‘Deed of Commitment under Geneva Call for Adherence to a Total Ban on Anti-Personnel Mines and for Cooperation in Mine Action’ (Geneva Call, 1 July 2019) <https://bit.ly/3DOwhRC>>Google Scholar
Gianelli, A, ‘Consuetudine (diritto internazionale)’ (Diritto on line, 2017) <https://bit.ly/3F1QjcG>>Google Scholar
Global Initiative to End Corporal Punishment of Children, ‘Progress’ (End Corporal Punishment, 2019) <https://endcorporalpunishment.org/countdown/>>Google Scholar
Guillaume, G, ‘The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Outlook for the International Legal Order’ (ICJ-CIJ, 27 October 2000) <www.icj-cij.org/public/files/press-releases/1/3001.pdf>>Google Scholar
Hathaway, O & Shapiro, SJ, ‘What Realists Don’t Understand About Law’ (Foreign Policy, 9 October 2017) <https://bit.ly/3kxeVlf>>Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch, ‘ICC: Jordan Was Required to Arrest Sudan’s Bashir’ (Human Rights Watch, 6 May 2019) <https://bit.ly/300ozFL>>Google Scholar
Hyde, D & Raffman, D, ‘Sorites Paradox’ (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 26 March 2018) <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sorites-paradox/>>Google Scholar
ICRC, ‘Increasing Respect for International Humanitarian Law in Non-International Armed Conflicts’ (ICRC, 2008) <https://bit.ly/3GK1K9y>>Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Analytical Guide to the Work of the International Law Commission’ (ILC, 10 December 2019) <http://legal.un.org/ilc/guide/gfra.shtml>>Google Scholar
Louth, J, ‘How Much Public International Law Scholarship Is There?’ (EJILTalk!, 10 January 2017) <https://bit.ly/3o3pTBq>>Google Scholar
Lugo, G, ‘The Dominican Republic’s Epidemic of Domestic Violence’ (Guardian, 23 November 2012) <https://bit.ly/30z5jzW>>Google Scholar
Mack, M, ‘Increasing Respect for International Humanitarian Law in Non-International Armed Conflicts’ (ICRC, 2008) <https://bit.ly/3GK1K9y>>Google Scholar
Milanovic, M, ‘ICJ Delivers Chagos Advisory Opinion, UK Loses Badly’ (EJIL: Talk!, 25 February 2019) <https://bit.ly/3FdrXNq>>Google Scholar
Mileva, N & Fortuna, M, ‘Emerging Voices: The Case for CIL Interpretation: An Argument from Theory and an Argument from Practice’ (Opinio Juris, 23 August 2019) <https://bit.ly/3yGm7BD>>Google Scholar
Moloney, A, ‘Break Silence on “Terrifying” Femicides in Dominican Republic: Minister’ (Reuters, 16 July 2017) <https://reut.rs/31TmrkD>>Google Scholar
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, ‘Press Release: Pillay Hails Completion of First-Ever Human Rights Review of All 193 States’ (OHCHR, 13 October 2011) <https://bit.ly/3HZdLsj>>Google Scholar
Peters, A, ‘Let Not Triepel Triumph: How To Make the Best Out of Sentenza No 238 of the Italian Constitutional Court for a Global Legal Order’ (EJILTalk!, 22 December 2014) <https://bit.ly/3s9sR9F>>Google Scholar
Republic of Korea, ‘Comments and Observations on the ILC Topic “Identification of Customary International Law”’ (ILC, 22 December 2017) <https://bit.ly/3r9bZzp>>Google Scholar
Richardson, HS, ‘Moral Reasoning’ (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2014) <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reasoning-moral/>>Google Scholar
Sender, O & Wood, M, ‘The International Court of Justice and Customary International Law: A Reply to Stefan Talmon’ (EJIL: Talk!, 30 November 2015) <https://bit.ly/3xKvWOd>>Google Scholar
Swiss Confederation, ‘La pratique suisse relative à la détermination du droit international coutumier’ (ILC, 2017) <https://bit.ly/3oVWp7G>>Google Scholar
Talmon, S, ‘Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology and the Idyllic World of the ILC’ (EJIL: Talk!, 3 December 2015) <https://bit.ly/3EQMgQ2>>Google Scholar
United States Mission to the United Nations, ‘Letter to UN Security Council on Article 51’ (8 January 2020) <https://bit.ly/3ncI0nu>>Google Scholar
UPR Info, ‘UPR Info’s Database: Action category’ (UPR Info, October 2014) <www.upr-info.org/database/files/Database_Action_Category.pdf>>Google Scholar
US Mission Geneva, ‘Statements by the United States at the Meeting of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body Geneva’ (US Mission to International Organizations in Geneva, 18 December 2018) <https://bit.ly/3zN3oVn>>Google Scholar
US Department of Justice, ‘Memorandum for Alberto R. Gonzales, Counsel to President ‘Re: Standards of Conduct of Interrogation under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2340-2340A’ (1 August 2002) <www.justice.gov/olc/file/886061/download>>Google Scholar
USTR, Appellee Submission of the United States (30 September 2010) <https://bit.ly/3GEIABH>>Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access