Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:35:10.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of dietary inulin supplementation on growth performance, intestinal barrier integrity and microbial populations in weaned pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2020

Weikang Wang
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu611130, People’s Republic of China
Daiwen Chen
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu611130, People’s Republic of China
Bing Yu
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu611130, People’s Republic of China
Zhiqing Huang
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu611130, People’s Republic of China
Xiangbing Mao
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu611130, People’s Republic of China
Ping Zheng
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu611130, People’s Republic of China
Yuheng Luo
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu611130, People’s Republic of China
Jie Yu
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu611130, People’s Republic of China
Junqiu Luo
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu611130, People’s Republic of China
Hui Yan
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu611130, People’s Republic of China
Jun He*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu611130, People’s Republic of China
*
*Corresponding author: Professor Jun He, fax +86 28 86290922, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Here, we explored the influences of dietary inulin (INU) supplementation on growth performance and intestinal health in a porcine model. Thirty-two male weaned pigs (with an average body weight of 7·10 (sd 0·20) kg) were randomly assigned to four treatments and fed with a basal diet (BD) or BD containing 2·5, 5·0 and 10·0 g/kg INU. After a 21-d trial, pigs were killed for collection of serum and intestinal tissues. We show that INU supplementation had no significant influence on the growth performance in weaned pigs. INU significantly elevated serum insulin-like growth factor-1 concentration but decreased diamine oxidase concentration (P < 0·05). Interestingly, 2·5 and 5·0 g/kg INU supplementation significantly elevated the villus height in jejunum and ileum (P < 0·05). Moreover, 2·5 and 5·0 g/kg INU supplementation also elevated the villus height to crypt depth (V:C) in the duodenum and ileum and improved the distribution and abundance of tight-junction protein zonula occludens-1 in duodenum and ileum epithelium. INU supplementation at 10·0 g/kg significantly elevated the sucrase activity in the ileum mucosa (P < 0·05). INU supplementation decreased the expression level of TNF-α but elevated the expression level of GLUT 2 and divalent metal transporter 1 in the intestinal mucosa (P < 0·05). Moreover, INU increased acetic and butyric acid concentrations in caecum (P < 0·05). Importantly, INU elevated the Lactobacillus population but decreased the Escherichia coli population in the caecum (P < 0·05). These results not only indicate a beneficial effect of INU on growth performance and intestinal barrier functions but also offer potential mechanisms behind the dietary fibre-regulated intestinal health.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
© The Authors 2020

The intestinal epithelial barrier, mainly composed of a single layer of enterocytes and intercellular tight junctions (TJ), is a selective osmotic membrane which not only allows nutrients to enter the circulation from the intestinal lumen but also provides an inherent defence barrier against the entry of pathogens and toxins into the systemic circulation(Reference Turner1,Reference Halpern and Denning2) . For neonatal mammals, intestinal hypoplasia or disruption of the intestinal epithelial barrier is commonly accompanied by growth retardation and increasing the risk of developing diarrhoea and intestinal infections(Reference Kim, Hansen and Mullan3Reference Shiou, Yu and Chen5). Therefore, the avenue to improve the intestinal epithelial barrier functions has attracted considerable research interest worldwide.

Inulin (INU) is a group of naturally occurring polysaccharides belonging to a class of dietary fibre known as fructans(Reference Roberfroid6). The length of fructan chain of INU is ranging from 2 to 60 units, with an average degree of polymerisation of 10(Reference Leenheer and Smits7). INU can be isolated from a number of fruits and vegetables such as bananas, asparagus, leeks and onions. However, the industrially produced INU is mainly extracted from chicory (Compositae family) and Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus), since they are extremely abundant in fructans(Reference Van Loo, Coussement and Loenheer8). As an attractive dietary fibre, INU cannot be hydrolysed by mammal digestive enzymes in the small intestine but at least partially hydrolysed and fermented by intestinal microflora(Reference Roberfroid, Van Loo and Gibson9).

Previous studies indicated that INU plays a critical role in maintaining the gut health. For instance, INU can improve the intestinal function and gastrointestinal environment in weaned pigs by increasing the number and metabolic activity of beneficial microflora(Reference Mair, Plitzner and Domig10). Previous study indicated that oligosaccharides including the INU can be efficiently utilised by beneficial bacteria such as the Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. However, most harmful bacteria cannot utilise these carbon sources, resulting in inhibition of growth(Reference Zentek, Marquart and Pietrzak11,Reference Vanderwaaij, Berghuis and Lekkerke12) . Moreover, fermentation of dietary fibres by intestinal bacteria produces a lot of volatile fatty acids such as the acetate, propionate and butyrate, which can serve as an energy source for enterocytes and protect against various inflammations(Reference Flint, Scott and Louis13,Reference Gao, Yin and Zhang14) . Previous study also indicated that INU can serve as physical stimuli to promote the intestinal motility and secretion of intestinal fluid in rats(Reference Flamm, Glinsmann and Kritchevsky15). Although, the beneficial effects of INU on intestinal functions have been investigated in a variety of animal species, the molecular mechanisms still remain unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of dietary INU supplementation at different doses on growth performance and intestinal barrier functions in a pig model. The mechanism underlying the INU -regulated intestinal heath has also been partially elucidated.

Materials and methods

All the procedures used in the animal experiment were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University (no. 20180715).

Animal care and experimental design

Thirty-two pigs (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire), weaned at 21 d (with an average body weight of 7·10 (sd 0·20) kg), were randomly allotted to four dietary treatments (n 8). Pigs were fed with a basal diet (control group) or basal diet containing 2·5, 5·0 and 10·0 g/kg INU (99 % purity, kindly provided by Sichuan Junzheng Biofeed Co. Ltd) for 21 d. The experimental diet was formulated on the basis of nutrient requirements established by the National Research Council(16). The ingredients and nutrient levels of the experimental diets are shown in Table 1. All pigs were housed in individual metabolism cages (0·7 m × 1·5 m) and were given ad libitum access to fresh water. The pigs were hand-fed three times per d (08.00, 14.00 and 20.00 hours) in groove feeders to make sure the fresh feed available.

Table 1. Ingredients and nutrient composition of the basal diet

* Values were calculated.

Vitamin premix provided the following per kg of diets: vitamin A, 2·7 mg; vitamin D3, 0·075 mg; vitamin E, 20 mg; vitamin K3, 3·0 mg; vitamin B1, 1·5 mg; vitamin B2, 4·0 mg; vitamin B6, 3·0 mg; vitamin B12, 0·2 mg; niacin, 30 mg; pantothenic acid, 15 mg; folic acid, 0·75 mg; biotin, 0·1 mg.

Mineral premix provided the following per kg of diets, 25–50 kg: Fe (FeSO4·H2O) 60 mg, Cu (CuSO4·5H2O) 4 mg, Mn (MnSO4·H2O) 2 mg, Zn (ZnSO4·H2O) 60 mg, iodine (KI) 0·14 mg, Se (Na2SeO3) 0·2 mg; 50–75 kg: Fe (FeSO4·H2O) 50 mg, Cu (CuSO4·5H2O) 3·5 mg, Mn (MnSO4·H2O) 2 mg, Zn (ZnSO4·H2O) 50 mg, iodine (KI) 0·14 mg, Se (Na2SeO3) 0·15 mg; 75–125 kg: Fe (FeSO4·H2O) 40 mg, Cu (CuSO4·5H2O) 3 mg, Mn (MnSO4·H2O) 2 mg, Zn (ZnSO4·H2O) 50 mg, iodine (KI) 0·14 mg, Se (Na2SeO3) 0·15 mg.

Growth performance determination

At the start and end of the trial, individual pig body weight was recorded before feeding and the daily feed consumption per pig was measured throughout the study. Average daily body weight gain, average daily feed intake and the feed:gain ratio (F:G) were subsequently determined for each group from the data obtained.

Sample collections

At the end of the trial, blood samples were collected by venepuncture at 08.00 hours after 12 h of fasting. Then, the samples were centrifuged at 3500 g at 4°C for 10 min. After centrifugation, the serum samples were collected and frozen at –20°C until analysed. After blood collection, pigs were euthanised with an intravenous injection of chlorpromazine hydrochloride (3 mg/kg body weight) and then slaughtered by exsanguination protocols. Sections of the duodenum, jejunum and ileum were immediately isolated. Approximately 5 cm segments of the middle of duodenum, jejunum and ileum were gently flushed with ice-cold PBS and then fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde solution for morphological analyses and immunofluorescence. Finally, the residual duodenal, jejunal and ileal segments were scraped with a scalpel blade, and the mucosa samples were collected and stored at –80°C until analysis.

Serum biochemical analysis

The concentrations of glucose and TAG were measured using available commercial kits according to Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute. The levels of insulin, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), IgA, IgG, IgM, diamine oxidase (DAO) and d-lactic acid were determined using the ELISA kits that purchased from Jiangsu Jingmei Biological Technology Co. Ltd, and the specific operations were as per the instructions of kits. All the assays were performed in triplicate.

Intestinal morphology analysis

One cm long small intestine (including the duodenum, jejunum and ileum) was dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol and embedded in paraffin. Cross sections of each sample were prepared, stained with haematoxylin–eosin and then sealed by a neutral resin size. The intestinal morphology including villus height and crypt depth was determined by using an image processing and analysis system (Media Cybernetics).

Immunofluorescence analysis

After paraformaldehyde fixations for 72 h, the intestinal tissue samples for immunofluorescence were rinsed in PBS and subsequently transferred to 30 % sucrose solution (dissolved in PBS) and infiltrated overnight. These samples were embedded on the next day in O.C.T. compound (Sakura Finetek Co. Ltd) for frozen tissue specimens. Next, the embedded samples were cut into 5 mm thick sections, using a semi-automatic freezing microtome at −20°C and mounted on glass slides. The sections were permeabilised with 0·5 % Triton X-100 in PBS, at room temperature for 10 min. After washing three times with PBS, the sections were blocked with 10 % goat serum in PBS at room temperature for 30 min, followed by incubation overnight at 4°C with rabbit anti-occluding (at 1:100 dilution; Abcam plc.) antibody. After washing with PBS three times, the sections were incubated with a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Beijing Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology Co. Ltd) at 37°C for 30 min, followed by counterstaining with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole at room temperature for 10 min. Finally, after washing as described above, the sections were sealed with an anti-fluorescence quencher, and zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) protein distribution was visualised under a laser scanning confocal microscope (FV1000; Olympus Corporation).

Enzyme activity assays

Frozen intestinal mucosa samples were rapidly thawed and then mixed with ice-cold physiological saline at a ratio of 1:9 (w/v). Next, the mixtures were centrifuged at 3000 g, 4°C, for 15 min, to isolate the supernatants. Lactase, sucrase and maltase activities in the supernatant were measured by using available commercial kits according to Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute.

Total RNA isolation and reverse transcription

Total RNA was isolated from frozen duodenal, jejunal or ileal samples using TRIzol (Takara Biotechnology Co. Ltd). All the procedures were guided by the manufacturer’s manual. Briefly, 100 mg tissues were put into a mortar and grinded with 1 ml TRIzol reagent. The proteins in the grinded samples were precipitated by chloroform. After centrifugation, the supernatant was transferred into a new tube and isopropanol was added and mixed for 10 min. The total RNA has settled by centrifugation. The integrity of RNA was checked by electrophoresis on a 1·5 % agarose gel, and the concentration and quality were verified by UV spectrophotometry using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). After RNA isolation, 1 μg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using a PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit with cDNA Eraser (Takara Biotechnology Co. Ltd). The following conditions were used: 42°C for 2 min, then 37°C for 15 min, followed by 85°C for 5 s.

Analysis of gene expression

Real-time quantitative PCR was performed in an Option Monitor 3 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) using the SYBR Green Supermix (TaKaRa). Expression levels of β-actin (housekeeper genes), SGLT1, GLUT2, divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1), TNF-α, IL-6, ZO-1, Occluding and Claudin-1 in the small intestinal were analysed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Tli RNaseH Plus) reagents (TakaRa) and the QuanStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR detection system (Applied Biosystems). All primers were commercially synthesised and purified by Sangon Biotech Co. Ltd and are shown in Table 2. The reaction was performed in a volume of 10 μl consisting of 5 μl of SYBR Premix Ex Taq (2×), 1 μl of reverse primers, 1 μl of forward primers, 2 μl of doubled-distilled water and 1 μl of cDNA template. Cycling conditions were as follows: 5°C for 30 s, followed by forty cycles at 95°C for 5 s, 60°C for 34 s, under melt curve conditions at 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 1 min and then 95°C for 15 s (temperature change velocity 0·5°C/s). The target gene mRNA expression level was calculated using the 2–ΔΔCt method(17). Each sample was repeated in triplicate.

Table 2. Primer sequences for quantitative real-time PCR

F, forward; R, reverse.

SCFA assays

The concentrations of main SCFA (acetic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid) were determined by using a gas chromatograph system (VARIAN CP-3800; Varian; Capillary Column 30 m × 0·32 mm × 0·25 μm film thickness) following the previous method(Reference Franklin, Mathew and Vickers18). From each sample, 2 g faeces (stored at −20°C) were weighed. Then, 5 ml ddH2O was added. After vortex, each sample was centrifuged (12 000 g) at 4°C for 10 min. The supernatant (1 ml) was then transferred into an Eppendorf tube (2 ml) and mixed with 0·2 ml metaphosphoric acid. After 30 min incubation at 4°C, the tubes were centrifuged at 4°C for 10 min (12 000 g) and 1 µl of the supernatant was analysed using the GC with a flame ionisation detector and an oven temperature of 100–150°C (N2 as the carrier gas at 1·8 ml/min)(Reference Luo, Yang and Wright19).

Quantification of intestinal microflora by quantative PCR

Microbial genomic DNA in the caecal digesta was extracted by using the Stool DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tech) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The microbial real-time quantitative PCR was determined as described previously(Reference Chen, Chen and Michiels20). All primers and probes for total bacteria, Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium and Bacillus (Reference Tang, Qian and Yu21) (Table 3) were commercially synthesised from TaKaRa Biotechnology (Dalian) Co. Ltd. Briefly, the number of total bacteria was analysed by real-time quantitative PCR using SYBR Premix Ex Taq reagents (TaKaRa Biotechnology (Dalian) Co. Ltd) and CFX-96 real-time PCR detection system (BioRad Laboratories), and the numbers of Bacillus, Lactobacillus, E. coli and Bifidobacterium were analysed by real-time quantitative PCR using PrimerScriptTM PCR kit (perfect real time; TaKaRa Biotechnology (Dalian) Co. Ltd) and CFX-96 real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories) as previously described(Reference Chen, Chen and Michiels20). For the quantification of bacteria in the test samples, specific standard curves were generated by constructing standard plasmids as presented by Chen et al. (Reference Chen, Chen and Michiels20). In addition, bacterial copies were transformed (log10) before statistical analysis.

Table 3. Primer and probe sequences used for real-time PCR

F, forward; R, reverse; P, probe.

Statistical analysis

Results were analysed using an one-way ANOVA procedure of SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc.) followed by Duncan’s test for multi-group comparisons. To determine whether there was a significant linear response to INU, the linear and quadratic procedure was performed. All results were presented as means and total standard errors of the mean. Difference with P < 0·05 was considered to be significant, and 0·05 < P < 0·10 was considered to have a tendency.

Results

Effect of inulin on growth performance in weaned pigs

As shown in Table 4, no significant difference in growth performance was observed among the four groups (P > 0·05). Interestingly, the average daily feed intake and average daily body weight gain of pigs fed with 2·5 kg/kg INU increased by 12·2 and 20·1 %, respectively. The feed efficiency (F:G) of this group decreased by 8·33 %, as compared with the control group.

Table 4. Effect of dietary inulin (INU) supplementation on growth performance in weaned pigs*

(Mean values with their standard errors; n 6 per group)

* Pigs were fed with a basal diet (CON) or basal diet supplemented with 2·5, 5·0 and 10·0 g/kg INU, respectively.

Effect of inulin on serum parameters

As shown in Table 5, dietary INU supplementation had no influences on serum concentrations of insulin and d-lactate (P > 0·05). However, 2·5 g/kg INU supplementation elevated the serum IGF-1 concentration (P < 0·05) and significantly decreased the serum DAO concentration (P < 0·05). A higher dose (5·0 and 10·0 g/kg) of INU can also decrease the DAO concentration in the serum (P < 0·05). Moreover, 10·0 g/kg INU supplementation significantly elevated the serum IgA concentration (P < 0·05).

Table 5. Effect of dietary inulin (INU) supplementation on serum metabolites, hormones and immunogloblins in weaned pigs*

(Mean values with their standard errors; n 6 per group)

a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

* Pigs were fed with a basal diet (CON) or basal diet supplemented with 2·5, 5·0 and 10·0 g/kg INU, respectively.

Effect of inulin on intestinal morphology and distribution of the tight-junction protein zonula occludens-1

As shown in Fig. 1 and Table 6, 2·5 and 5·0 g/kg INU supplementation significantly elevated the villus height in the jejunum and ileum (P < 0·05). In contrast, 10·0 g/kg INU supplementation had no influence on villus height in the jejunum but significantly increased the villus height in the ileum (P < 0·05). As compared with the control group, 2·5 and 5·0 g/kg INU supplementation elevated the ratio of villus height:crypt depth (V:C) in the duodenum and ileum (P < 0·05). However, there were no significant differences among the INU supplementation groups (P > 0·05). Immunofluorescence analysis showed that the staining of the major TJ-related protein ZO-1 in the control group was diffused with little staining at the intercellular TJ region, indicating disruption of the intestinal barrier functions (Fig. 2). However, the ZO-1 protein was highly expressed and localised to the apical intercellular region of the duodenum and ileal epithelium in pigs fed with an INU-containing diet.

Fig. 1. Effect of inulin (INU) on morphology of the small intestine in weaned pigs (haematoxylin–eosin; ×100). Pigs were fed with a basal diet (CON) or basal diet supplemented with 2·5, 5·0 and 10·0 g/kg INU, respectively. Black arrows indicate disruption of the intestinal mucosa in the CON group.

Table 6. Effects of dietary inulin (INU) supplementation on intestinal mucosal morphology in weaned pigs*

(Mean values with their standard errors; n 6 per group)

V:C, villus height to crypt depth.

a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

* Pigs were fed with a basal diet (CON) or basal diet supplemented with 2·5, 5·0 and 10·0 g/kg INU, respectively.

Fig. 2. Effect of inulin (INU) on tight junction distribution. Localisation of zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) and DAPI (DNA) within the duodenum, jejunum and ileum of weaned pigs was assessed by immunofluorescence. ZO-1 protein (red), DAPI stain (blue), as well as merged ZO-1 protein and DAPI are presented. Pigs were fed with a basal diet (CON) or basal diet supplemented with 2·5, 5·0 and 10·0 g/kg INU, respectively. Red arrows indicate diffused distribution of ZO-1 protein in the CON group.

Effect of inulin on intestinal mucosa enzyme activity

As shown in Table 7, 2·5 and 5 g/kg INU supplementation increased the sucrase activity in the duodenum mucosa by 31·26 and 31·68 %, respectively (0·05 < P < 0·10). INU supplementation at 10·0 g/kg significantly elevated the sucrase activity in the ileum mucosa (P < 0·05).

Table 7. Effect of dietary inulin (INU) supplementation on enzyme activity in intestinal mucosa*

(Mean values with their standard errors; n 6 per group)

a,bMean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

* Pigs were fed with a basal diet (CON) or basal diet supplemented with 2·5, 5·0 and 10·0 g/kg INU, respectively.

Effect of inulin on the expression of genes related to inflammatory response and barrier functions

As compared with the control group, 2·5 g/kg INU supplementation significantly decreased the expression level of TNF-α in the duodenum and ileum mucosa (P < 0·05). But the expression level of IL-6 was not affected by INU supplementation (Fig. 3). Interestingly, INU supplementation altered the expression levels of several critical genes related to intestinal barrier functions (Fig. 4). As compared with the control group, 2·5 g/kg INU supplementation significantly elevated the expression levels of GLU2, ZO-1 and Claudin-1 in the duodenum mucosa (P < 0·05). INU supplementation (2·5 g/kg) also elevated the expression level of DMT1 in the jejunum mucosa (P < 0·05). Moreover, INU supplementation at a higher dose (5·0 and 10·0 g/kg) significantly elevated the expression levels of ZO-1 and Claudin-1 in the duodenum mucosa (P < 0·05) and elevated the expression levels of GLU2 and DMT1 in the jejunum mucosa (P < 0·05).

Fig. 3. Effect of inulin (INU) on expression levels of inflammatory cytokines. (A) TNF-α; (B) IL-6. Pigs were fed with a basal diet (CON) or basal diet supplemented with 2·5, 5·0 and 10·0 g/kg INU, respectively. , CON; , 2·5 g/kg INU; , 5 g/kg INU; , 10 g/kg INU.

Fig. 4. Effect of inulin (INU) on expression levels of genes related to intestinal barrier functions. (A) GLUT2; (B) Na+–glucose co-transporter 1 (SGLT1); (C) divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1); (D) zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1); (E) claudin-1; (F) occludin. Pigs were fed with a basal diet (CON) or basal diet supplemented with 2·5, 5·0 and 10·0 g/kg INU, respectively. , CON; , 2·5 g/kg INU; , 5 g/kg INU; , 10 g/kg INU.

Effect of inulin on intestinal microbial populations and metabolites

As shown in Fig. 5(A), INU supplementation significantly increased the acetic acid concentration in the caecal digesta (P < 0·05). INU supplementation at 10·0 g/kg also increased the butyric acid concentration (P < 0·05). Interestingly, INU supplementation has resulted in elevated abundance of the Lactobacillus population in the caecal digesta (P < 0·05). Moreover, 2·5 g/kg INU supplementation significantly decreased the E. coli population in the caecum (P < 0·05).

Fig. 5. Effect of inulin (INU) on intestinal microbial population and metabolites. (A) SCFA concentration in the caecum; (B) selected microbial population in the caecum. Pigs were fed with a basal diet (CON) or basal diet supplemented with 2·5, 5·0 and 10·0 g/kg INU, respectively. , CON; , 2·5 g/kg INU; , 5 g/kg INU; , 10 g/kg INU.

Discussion

In recent years, dietary fibres have attracted considerable research interest worldwide since they have been implicated in regulating the gut health and metabolisms(Reference Jha and Berrocoso22). INU is a soluble dietary fibre extracted from natural plants such as the chicory and Jerusalem artichoke. In the present study, we found that dietary INU supplementation had no significant influence on the growth performance in weaned pigs. This is probably due to the diet formulation, as the INU only accounted for a small portion of the diet, and there were no significant differences in other nutrient levels among the four groups. Moreover, our result is consistent with previous studies on the weaned and growing-finishing pigs(Reference Frantz, Nelssen and Derouchey23,Reference Vanhoof and Schrijver24) .

Interestingly, INU supplementation with 2·5 and 5·0 g/kg not only elevated the villus height in the jejunum and ileum but also elevated the V:C in the duodenum and ileum. Increasing the intestinal villus height suggested an increased surface area capable of absorption of available nutrients from the intestinal tract(Reference O’Brien, Nelson and Huang25). Importantly, increases in the villus height and the ratio of V:C significantly elevated the rate of epithelial turnover(Reference Pluske, Thompson and Atwood26). The improved intestinal morphology may be associated with the elevated IGF-1 concentration in the serum, since it has been looked as a critical regulator of organ development and growth(Reference Walton, Dunshea and Ballard27). For instance, IGF-1 significantly stimulates cell proliferation and plays an important role in reconstitution of intestinal epithelial integrity after mucosal injury(Reference Chen, Nezu and Wasa28). In the present study, 2·5 g/kg INU supplementation significantly increased IGF-1 concentration in the serum. It is noteworthy that 10·0 g/kg INU supplementation had no significant influence on villus height in the duodenum and jejunum but elevated the villus height and the ratio of V:C in the ileum. To further explore its influence on the integrity of intestinal barrier, we investigated the distribution of the major TJ-related protein ZO-1 by immunofluorescence analysis. The TJ proteins such as claudin-1 and ZO-1 are capable of binding to the cytoskeleton, which not only act as major constituents of the intestinal epithelial barrier but also act as critical regulators of paracellular permeability(Reference Harhaj and Antonetti29). We found that the ZO-1 staining of the control group was diffuse with little staining at the intercellular TJ region, suggesting disruption of the TJ. However, the ZO-1 protein was highly expressed and localised to the apical intercellular region of the duodenum and ileal epithelium in pigs fed with an INU-containing diet. The result is consistent with the measurements of the intestinal permeability by using the blood indices. DAO is an intracellular enzyme synthesised by intestinal epithelium and mainly distributed in cytoplasm(Reference Thompson, Vaughan and Forst30). Disruption of the intestinal barrier usually leads to releasing of the DAO into the blood circulation(Reference Nieto, Torres and Fernández31). Therefore, the activity of DAO in the blood can serve as one of the circulating markers for monitoring the integrity of intestinal barrier(Reference Chen, Zheng and Zhang32). In the present study, INU supplementation significantly decreased the serum DAO concentration. Both these results indicated that INU supplementation could improve the integrity of intestinal barrier.

The mucosal maltase and sucrase are responsible for the degradation of disaccharides(Reference Zheng, Tan and Liu33). In the present study, 2·5 and 5·0 g/kg INU supplementation increased the sucrase activity in the duodenum mucosa, while 10 g/kg INU supplementation increased the sucrase activity in the ileum mucosa. We further explored the expression levels of several critical genes involved in nutrient digestion, absorption and intestinal barrier integrity. The GLUT2 and DMT1 are two important transport proteins in the intestinal epithelium that are responsible for glucose and Fe transportation, respectively(Reference Breves, Kock and Schröder34,Reference Hiromi, Yuko and Custodio35) . In the present study, INU supplementation significantly elevated the expression levels of GLUT2 and DMT1 in the Proximal intestinal mucosa, which suggested an improved digestive capacity in pigs after INU ingestion. Our results are also consistent with previous reports that dietary fibres can facilitate the alvine advance rate and significantly improve the alvine absorbing functions(Reference Lan, Zhong and Yong36,Reference Takeda and Kiriyama37) . TNF-α and IL-6 are two important pro-inflammatory cytokines that play a critical role in regulating the host immunity(Reference Al and Boivin38,Reference Yulan, Feng and Jack39) . However, overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines may lead to muscle wasting and disruption of intestinal barrier functions(Reference Ning, Gu and Qu40). In this study, 2·5 g/kg INU supplementation significantly decreased the expression level of TNF-α in the intestinal mucosa indicating a novel function of the INU in regulating the intestinal inflammatory responses.

INU is mainly catabolised by beneficial bacteria such as the Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium and produces various volatile fatty acids (e.g. acetic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid) and organic acids (e.g. succinic acid and pyruvate)(Reference Urban and Inger41). However, harmful bacteria such as E. coli and Salmonella cannot use the oligofructose(Reference Bailey42). Moreover, the fermented products by beneficial bacteria provide an acidic environment that is important for inhibiting the growth of harmful bacteria(Reference Urban and Inger41,Reference Bailey42) . The fermented products also play a critical role in maintaining the intestinal health. For instance, the butyric acid can not only serve as an energy source for animals but also promote proliferation and differentiation of the intestinal epithelial cells(Reference Flint, Scott and Louis13). In the present study, INU supplementation significantly elevated the concentration of butyric acid in the caecum, which offers a potential mechanism underlying the INU-improved intestinal barrier functions. Additionally, dietary INU supplementation increased the lactobacilli population but decreased the E. coli population in the caecum. The result is consistent with previous reports that dietary fibres facilitate the growth of beneficial bacteria such as the lactobacilli and Bacillus but inhibit the growth of potential pathogenic bacterial species such as the E. coli (Reference Roberfroid, Van Loo and Gibson9,Reference Urban and Inger41Reference Kleessen, Sykura and Zunft44) . Both these results suggested a beneficial role of dietary fibres in regulating the intestinal microbial ecology and health.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our result suggested a beneficial role of dietary INU supplementation in improving the growth performance and intestinal health in weaned pigs. The mechanisms of action might be closely associated with suppressing of the intestinal inflammatory response, improving of the intestinal morphology and barrier functions, and changes of the microbial fermentation.

Acknowledgements

We thank Wenjie Tang, Keming Le, Lei Liu and Huifen Wang for their diligent contribution to the animal experiments.

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972599), Development Program of Sichuan Province (2018NZDZX0005) and the Youth Innovation teams of Animal Feed Biotechnology of Sichuan Province (2016TD0028).

J. H. conceived and designed the experiments. W. W. performed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. D. C., B. Y., X. M., P. Z., J. Y., Z. H., J. L., Y. L. and H. Y. gave constructive comments for the results and discussion of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

Turner, JR (2009) Intestinal mucosal barrier function in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 9, 799809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halpern, MD & Denning, PW (2015) The role of intestinal epithelial barrier function in the development of NEC. Tissue Barriers 3, e1000707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, JC, Hansen, CF, Mullan, BP, et al. (2001) Nutrition and pathology of weaner pigs: nutritional strategies to support barrier function in the gastrointestinal tract. Anim Feed Sci Tech 83, 316.Google Scholar
Smith, F & Clark, JB (2010) Early weaning stress impairs development of mucosal barrier function in the porcine intestine. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 298, 352363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shiou, SR, Yu, Y, Chen, S, et al. (2011) Erythropoietin protects intestinal epithelial barrier function and lowers the incidence of experimental neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. J Biol Chem 286, 1212312132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberfroid, M (2007) Prebiotics: the concept revisited. J Nutr 137, 830S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leenheer, LD & Smits, G (2000) Process for the manufacture of chicory inulin, hydrolysates and derivatives of inulin, and improved chicory inulin products, hydrolysates and derivatives.Google Scholar
Van Loo, J, Coussement, P & Loenheer, LDe (1995) On the presence of inulin and oligofructose as natural ingredients in the western diet. Food Sci Nutr 35, 525552.Google ScholarPubMed
Roberfroid, MB, Van Loo, JA & Gibson, GR (1998) The bifidogenic nature of chicory inulin and its hydrolysis products. J Nutr 128, 1119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mair, C, Plitzner, C, Domig, KJ, et al. (2001) Impact of inulin and a multispecies probiotic formulation on performance, microbial ecology and concomitant fermentation patterns in newly weaned piglets. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 94, e164e177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zentek, J, Marquart, B, Pietrzak, Tet al. (2003) Dietary effects on bifidobacteria and Clostridium perfringens in the canine intestinal tract. J Anim Physiol Nutr 87, 1112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanderwaaij, D, Berghuis, JM & Lekkerke, JE (1971) Colonization resistance of digestive tract in conventional and antibiotic-treated mice. J Hyg Camb 69, 405441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, HJ, Scott, KP, Louis, P, et al. (2012) The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9, 577–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, Z, Yin, J, Zhang, J, et al. (2009) Butyrate improves insulin sensitivity and increases energy expenditure in mice. Diabetes 58, 15091517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flamm, G, Glinsmann, W, Kritchevsky, D, et al. (2001) Inulin and oligofructose as dietary fiber: a review of the evidence. C R C Criti Rev Food Sci Nutr 41, 353362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (2012) Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 11th revised ed., pp. 210211. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
LIVAK (2012) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 (-Delta Delta C (T)) method. Methods 25, 402408.Google Scholar
Franklin, MA, Mathew, AG, Vickers, JR, et al. (2002) Characterization of microbial populations and volatile fatty acid concentrations in the jejunum, ileum, and cecum of pigs weaned at 17 vs 24 days of age. J Anim Sci 80, 29042910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luo, YH, Yang, C, Wright, ADG, et al. (2015) Responses in ileal and cecal bacteria to low and high amylose/amylopectin ratio diets in growing pigs. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99, 1062710638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, H, Chen, D, Michiels, J, et al. (2013) Dietary fiber affects intestinal mucosal barrier function by regulating intestinal bacteria in weaning piglets. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci 78, 7178.Google ScholarPubMed
Tang, WJ, Qian, Y, Yu, B, et al. (2019) Effects of Bacillus subtilis dsm32315 supplementation and dietary crude protein level on performance, barrier function and gut microbiota profile in weaned piglets. J Anim Sci 97, 21252138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha, R & Berrocoso, JD (2015) Review: Dietary fiber utilization and its effects on physiological functions and gut health of swine. Animal 9, 14411452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frantz, NZ, Nelssen, JL, Derouchey, JM, et al. (2003). Effects of a prebiotic, inulin, and a direct fed microbial on growth performance of weanling pigs. Kansas State University swine day report of progress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhoof, K & Schrijver, RD (1996) Nitrogen metabolism in rats and pigs fed inulin. Nutr Res 16, 10351039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, DP, Nelson, LA & Huang, FS (2001) Intestinal adaptation: structure, function, and regulation. Semin Pediatr Surg 10, 5664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pluske, JR, Thompson, MJ, Atwood, CS, et al. (1996) Maintenance of villus height and crypt depth, and enhancement of disaccharide digestion and monosaccharide absorption, in piglets fed on cows’ whole milk after weaning. Br J Nutr 76, 409422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walton, PE, Dunshea, FR & Ballard, FJ (1995) In vivo actions of IGF analogues with poor affinities for IGFBPs: metabolic and growth effects in pigs of different ages and GH responsiveness. Prog Growth Factor Res 6, 385395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, K, Nezu, R, Wasa, M, et al. (1999) Insulin-like growth factor-1 modulation of intestinal epithelial cell restitution. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 23, S89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harhaj, NS & Antonetti, DA (2004) Regulation of tight junctions and loss of barrier function in pathophysiology. Int J Biochem Cell B 36, 12061237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, JS, Vaughan, WP & Forst, CF (1987) The effect of the route of nutrient delivery on gut structure and diamine oxidase levels. J Pare Enteral Nutr 11, 2832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nieto, N, Torres, MI & Fernández, MI (2000) Experimental ulcerative colitis impairs antioxidant defense system in rat intestine. Dig Dis Sci 45, 18201827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, JL, Zheng, P, Zhang, C, et al. (2017) Benzoic acid beneficially affects growth performance of weaned pigs which was associated with changes in gut bacterial populations, morphology indices and growth factor gene expression. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 101, 11371146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, ZL, Tan, JYW & Liu, HY (2009) Evaluation of oregano essential oil (Origanum heracleoticum L.) on growth, antioxidant effect and resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). Aquaculture 292, 214218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breves, G, Kock, J & Schröder, B (2007) Transport of nutrients and electrolytes across the intestinal wall in pigs. Livest Sci 109, 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiromi, G, Yuko, F, Custodio, AO, et al. (2005) Slc11a2 is required for intestinal iron absorption and erythropoiesis but dispensable in placenta and liver. J Clin Invest 115, 12581266.Google Scholar
Lan, Z, Zhong, H, Yong, S, et al. (2005) Effect of dietary fiber from Pueraria radix on the digestion-absorption function of mice. J Cent South Univ T 25, 6366.Google Scholar
Takeda, H & Kiriyama, S (1991) Effect of feeding amaranth (food red no. 2) on the jejunal sucrase and digestion-absorption capacity of the jejunum in rats. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 37, 611623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al, SR & Boivin, MT (2009) Mechanism of cytokine modulation of epithelial tight junction barrier. Front Biosci Landmrk 14, 27652778.Google Scholar
Yulan, L, Feng, C, Jack, O, et al. (2012) Fish oil enhances intestinal integrity and inhibits TLR4 and NOD2 signaling pathways in weaned pigs after LPS challenge. J Nutr 142, 20172024.Google Scholar
Ning, L, Gu, L, Qu, L, et al. (2010) Berberine attenuates pro-inflammatory cytokine-induced tight junction disruption in an invitro model of intestinal epithelial cells. Eur J Pharm Sci 40, 18.Google Scholar
Urban, N & Inger, B (1988) Availability of cereal fructans and inulin in the rat intestinal tract. J Nutr 118, 14821486.Google Scholar
Bailey, JS (1991) Effect of fructooligosaccharides on salmonella colonization of chick intestine. Poult Sci 70, 24332438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous, (1999) Nutritional and Health Benefits of Inulin and Oligofructose. Proceedings of a conference. Bethesda, Maryland, USA. May 18–19, 1998. J Nutr 129, 1395S1502S.Google Scholar
Kleessen, B, Sykura, B, Zunft, HJ, et al. (1997) Effects of inulin and lactose on fecal microflora, microbial activity, and bowel habit in elderly constipated persons. Am J Clin Nutr 65, 13971402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Ingredients and nutrient composition of the basal diet

Figure 1

Table 2. Primer sequences for quantitative real-time PCR

Figure 2

Table 3. Primer and probe sequences used for real-time PCR

Figure 3

Table 4. Effect of dietary inulin (INU) supplementation on growth performance in weaned pigs*(Mean values with their standard errors; n 6 per group)

Figure 4

Table 5. Effect of dietary inulin (INU) supplementation on serum metabolites, hormones and immunogloblins in weaned pigs*(Mean values with their standard errors; n 6 per group)

Figure 5

Fig. 1. Effect of inulin (INU) on morphology of the small intestine in weaned pigs (haematoxylin–eosin; ×100). Pigs were fed with a basal diet (CON) or basal diet supplemented with 2·5, 5·0 and 10·0 g/kg INU, respectively. Black arrows indicate disruption of the intestinal mucosa in the CON group.

Figure 6

Table 6. Effects of dietary inulin (INU) supplementation on intestinal mucosal morphology in weaned pigs*(Mean values with their standard errors; n 6 per group)

Figure 7

Fig. 2. Effect of inulin (INU) on tight junction distribution. Localisation of zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) and DAPI (DNA) within the duodenum, jejunum and ileum of weaned pigs was assessed by immunofluorescence. ZO-1 protein (red), DAPI stain (blue), as well as merged ZO-1 protein and DAPI are presented. Pigs were fed with a basal diet (CON) or basal diet supplemented with 2·5, 5·0 and 10·0 g/kg INU, respectively. Red arrows indicate diffused distribution of ZO-1 protein in the CON group.

Figure 8

Table 7. Effect of dietary inulin (INU) supplementation on enzyme activity in intestinal mucosa*(Mean values with their standard errors; n 6 per group)

Figure 9

Fig. 3. Effect of inulin (INU) on expression levels of inflammatory cytokines. (A) TNF-α; (B) IL-6. Pigs were fed with a basal diet (CON) or basal diet supplemented with 2·5, 5·0 and 10·0 g/kg INU, respectively. , CON; , 2·5 g/kg INU; , 5 g/kg INU; , 10 g/kg INU.

Figure 10

Fig. 4. Effect of inulin (INU) on expression levels of genes related to intestinal barrier functions. (A) GLUT2; (B) Na+–glucose co-transporter 1 (SGLT1); (C) divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1); (D) zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1); (E) claudin-1; (F) occludin. Pigs were fed with a basal diet (CON) or basal diet supplemented with 2·5, 5·0 and 10·0 g/kg INU, respectively. , CON; , 2·5 g/kg INU; , 5 g/kg INU; , 10 g/kg INU.

Figure 11

Fig. 5. Effect of inulin (INU) on intestinal microbial population and metabolites. (A) SCFA concentration in the caecum; (B) selected microbial population in the caecum. Pigs were fed with a basal diet (CON) or basal diet supplemented with 2·5, 5·0 and 10·0 g/kg INU, respectively. , CON; , 2·5 g/kg INU; , 5 g/kg INU; , 10 g/kg INU.