Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T21:11:40.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Judicial Dialogue in Social Media Cases in Europe: Exploring the Role of Peers in Judicial Adjudication – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2021

E. Psychogiopoulou

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

judicial dialoguesocial medianational courtsCJEUECtHR
Type
Corrigendum
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 22 , Special Issue 7: Judges Under Stress , October 2021 , pp. 1385
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the German Law Journal

The author apologises that the funding details below, including grant number, were missing from the article on its original publication. The article (in its PDF and HTML formats) has been updated to include this funding information in the unnumbered footnote, after the sentences about the author’s research background. This corrigendum has been published in order to be transparent about the change to the scholarly record.

“Research for this article received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Programme in the framework of the COMPACT project (grant agreement H2020-ICT-2016-2 No. 762128). Warm thanks go to the project’s national experts in the countries under study for the collection of social media case law and Dr Federica Casarosa and Dr Anna Kandyla for their fruitful collaboration.”

The online version of this article has been updated to list the authors correctly.

References

Psychogiopoulou, E. (2021). Judicial Dialogue in Social Media Cases in Europe: Exploring the Role of Peers in Judicial Adjudication. German Law Journal, 22(6), 915–935. doi: 10.1017/glj.2021.57CrossRefGoogle Scholar