Introduction
Sub-surface melt pools occur beneath blue glacier ice in the western part of the McMurdo Ice Shelf, Antarctica. In the austral summer of 1965–66, a reconnaissance of this area for an alternative airfield disclosed several melt pools; however, their full extent was not realized at that time. During construction of the “Outer Williams Field” alternative airfield, these melt pools were found to extend throughout the proposed runway area and they presented a serious hazard to aircraft traffic.
In “Deep Freeze 67”, an investigation was initiated to determine the extent, seasonal history and cause of sub-surface melt pools in an effort to find the best means of preventing their occurrence within the runway area. This report describes the melt pools, their origin, the main factors contributing to their formation and the effectiveness of a chipped ice and snow surface in preventing their formation.
Location and Physical Setting
“Outer Williams Field” is located on the vast, relatively smooth expanse of glacier ice in the western part of the McMurdo Ice Shelf at approximately lat. 77° 57′ 40″ S., long. 166° 28′ 30″ E. (Fig. 1). Access from McMurdo station to “Outer Williams Field” is provided by 22 km of compacted-snow road via Scott Base and the present Williams Field Air Facility (Fig. 2).
The airfield is west of a transitional climatic zone where the annual budget changes from positive to negative. To the east of this zone, accumulation exceeds ablation; to the west, ablation exceeds accumulation and the glacier surface is partially free of snow throughout most of the summer and fall (Reference PaigePaige, 1966, p. 6). Little is known concerning the local climate in the western part of the ice shelf except that the intensity of melting and ablation increases westward towards Victoria Land.
Description of Melt Pools
The sub-surface melt pools occur throughout an elongated, poorly defined, 110-km2 area that trends north–south in the western part of the McMurdo Ice Shelf. The glacier surface in this area has a mottled appearance caused by thin, patchy snowdrifts and low mounds of white bubbly ice distributed in a random pattern on clear, blue glacier ice. The melt pools are impossible to detect by visual examination but they occur exclusively beneath the blue ice. The topography of the area is relatively smooth with a northerly slope of only a few feet per mile and a subdued hummocky surface having a relative relief of 30 to 60 cm. The melt pools vary widely in size and shape but they are generally 0.5 to 1.0 m deep and span circular or elliptical areas 10 to 15 m in diameter. Starting in mid-December, the ice over the melt pools decreases in thickness from 30 or 40 cm to as little as 7 cm by mid January and it may not support even lightweight tracked vehicles. Farther to the west towards Victoria Land, surface meltfeatures become increasingly common in the form of open melt pools and surface melt-water run-off.
The sub-surface melt pools alternate with low, gently rounded mounds of white bubbly ice. These ice mounds are seldom more than 60 cm high and span a circular area varying from 2 m to more than 8 m. Reference CailleuxCailleux (1962, p. 132) has described similar mounds forming on small lakes elsewhere in the McMurdo Sound region. The ice mounds are similar in many respects to pingos that occur in permafrost regions of the Arctic (Reference MullerMuller, 1947, p. 59) and here they are termed ice pingos.
Origin of the Melt Pools
The melt pools are caused by the greenhouse effect of intense solar radiation, low albedo of the blue glacier ice, and heat absorption by dark objects. Sub-surface melting begins in mid-December and it consists of intergranular moisture as evidenced by moist auger cuttings. This initial melting, which usually occurs at depths of 40 cm or more, may or may not be associated with the presence of dirt. As melting progresses, a lenticular pool forms with sub-surface boundaries determined by the surface configuration of snowdrifts and ice pingos. Melting progresses both upwards and downwards, and eventually the ice cover over the sub-surface pool decreases to as little as 7 cm, and the total depth may reach 1 m.
As winter approaches, the melt pools begin to refreeze and the enclosed water is trapped under increasing hydrostatic pressure. Eventually, this pressure is relieved either when the entire roof of the melt pool is uplifted to form an ice pingo or when cracking releases the water as a surface flow. Tension cracks radiating from the center of the mound develop and release any remaining water.
The surface features throughout the vast melt-pool area near “Outer Williams Field” constantly change in response to the seasons. Melt pools that form during the summer may become ice pingos the following winter. The effects of sublimation, melting and wind may eventually reduce the topographic expression of an ice pingo so that it once again becomes a melt pool.
The sub-surface melt pools appear to be a feature unique to the western part of the McMurdo Ice Shelf. Reports of similar features are rare in the literature and describe various melt phenomena occurring on frozen lakes or bay ice elsewhere in Antarctica. Some of the ice mounds described by Reference CailleuxCailleux (1962, p. 131, 132) have been studied by the author and they were found to be ice pingos resulting from the refreezing of sub-surface melt pools identical to those near “Outer Williams Field”.
Reference van AutenboerVan Autenboer (1962, p. 351) has described ice mounds on a large frozen lake in the Sør-Rondane, Antarctica, that appear to be identical to those in the McMurdo Sound region and probably formed by the same process. He has also described other melt phenomena (p. 352) that are common on the McMurdo Ice Shelf, especially near Black Island and west of “Outer Williams Field”.
Reference TakahashiTakahashi ([1960], p. 322) has described melt pools that occur in snow and snow-ice deposited on saline bay ice of the Prins Olav Kyst of Antarctica. These melt pools are similar in size and shape to those in the McMurdo Ice Shelf and they are often concealed by a crust of ice and snow (p. 323, 325). Their origin is attributed predominantly to the effects of solar radiation and the absorptivity differences of snow and ice (p. 326, 330), although high ambient temperatures and warm winds are also considered. Other sub-surface melt pools and ice mounds probably occur under similar climatic conditions elsewhere in Antarctica but they have not yet been discovered or reported.
Factors affecting Sub-surface Melting
A combination of factors, such as solar radiation, albedo, dark-colored rock particles in the ice, air temperature and the presence or absence of snow, contribute, with varying degrees of importance, to sub-surface melting. Of these factors, solar radiation, albedo and the presence or absence of snow probably have the greatest effect.
Solar Radiation
Solar-radiation energy is probably the single mest important factor contributing to sub-surface melting. Glaciological studies in Alaska show that solar radiation furnishes at least 75 per cent of the energy required to melt ice (Reference Mayo, Péwé and KingeryMayo and Péwé, 1963, p. 640). Reference SagarSagar (1962, p. 18, 19) has stated that radiation is of prime importance to the ablation season in the central Arctic. Solar-radiation data for the McMurdo Sound region have been presented by Reference Thompson and MacdonaldThompson and Macdonald (1962). These data show a high percentage of sunshine and high-intensity radiation that approaches 105 kJ/cm2 in mid-summer (p. 887, 880).
Albedo
The reflectivity, or albedo, of the surface regulates the heat energy absorbed and it is as important as solar radiation in causing various melt features on glaciers. Diurnal and seasonal albedo variations are common and they are caused by solar angle, color, grain form, solid impurities (Reference MellorMellor, 1964, p. 93), surface roughness, melting and refreezing, and cloud cover (Reference Diamond and GerdelDiamond and Gerdel, 1956, p. 5).
Albedo of snow
Freshly fallen snow, or fine-grained drift snow, probably has the highest albedo of any natural substance. Published values vary from 70 to 95 per cent but they are mostly above 80 per cent (Reference MantisMantis, 1951, p. 64, 66; Reference Diamond and GerdelDiamond and Gerdel, 1956, p. 5, 6). Measurements over newly fallen snow near Williams Field gave an albedo of 86 per cent. As snow ages, the albedo decreases because of changes in grain-size, color and density (Reference MantisMantis, 1951, p. 64; Reference ChernigovskiyChernigovskiy, 1966, p. 154–57). Melting and refreezing forms an icy surface that also increases the absorption and scattering of solar energy. The presence of a light, fine-grained snow cover, even if thin, affords considerable protection against solar radiation.
Albedo of ice
The albedo of ice is considerably less than that of snow and it is affected largely by color, impurities and the presence or absence of melt water. Reference ChernigovskiyChernigovskiy (1966, p. 162) has reported albedo values from 72 per cent (probably for clean white ice) to 36 per cent for blue ice beneath melt water. Reference Lyons and StoiberLyons and Stoiber (1959) have stressed the difference between flawless ice and bubbly ice in measuring the adsorption (p. 11) of various wavelengths of energy. They have further stated (p. 8) that the energy absorbed by bubbly ice is as much as twice that absorbed by flawless ice. Air bubbles are common in glacier ice, especially in the vicinity of “Outer Williams Field”, where the ice above and below the melt pools is quite bubbly and has a density of only o.88 Mg/m3. Also, the ice associated with the melt pools was deep blue or aquamarine and had an albedo of 48 per cent.
Effects of Dirt in Ice and Snow
The presence of dirt or other dark contaminant lowers the albedo, absorbs heat and accelerates melting. Dirt of volcanic origin is common in the ice and snow at “Outer Williams Field”. This material is transported by high winds from Black Island and Brown Peninsula, and it has a size distribution ranging from fine dust up to particles 6 mm in diameter. The bubbly glacier ice at “Outer Williams Field” contains isolated grains or thin discontinuous layers and lenses of dirt throughout at least the upper 2 m of ice. Also, the bottoms of many melt pools have a thin layer of dark mud and sand, usually at depths of 1.0 to 1.5 m.
Prevention of Sub-surface Melting
Sub-surface melting does not begin until early or mid-December, and refreezing begins in late January; the maximum period of sub-surface melting is therefore 10 to 12 weeks. A high-albedo surface layer with some insulating properties is needed to protect the underlying ice from intense solar radiation during this short period.
The runway at “Outer Williams Field” was prepared for use by leveling and smoothing the surface with wheel-mounted pulvimixers. Pulvimixing produces a layer 7 to 15 cm thick consisting of chipped ice and powdered ice mixed with snow. This white, dense layer had an albedo of 76 per cent, and it was completely effective in preventing the formation of melt pools within the runway area.
Patches of bare ice caused by high winds or traffic occasionally developed on the runway. Sub-surface melting quickly occurred under many of the larger bare areas but no distinct voids ever formed. Subsurface melting beneath large, semi-stable snowdrifts or pulvimixed ice was not detected at any time during the summer of “Deep Freeze 67” or “Deep Freeze 68”. The thickness of snow or pulvimixed ice seemed to make little difference in preventing sub-surface melting provided that the snow or ice cover was more than 3 cm thick.
Conclusions
It is apparent that the sub-surface melting in the vicinity of “Outer Williams Field” is controlled by a delicate balance between solar radiation, albedo, snow cover, and air and ice temperatures. Less than 2 km to the east, melting does not occur and snow accumulation begins to exceed ablation. Only 6.5 km to the west, surface melting and surface melt-water run-off predominate over sub-surface melting, and ablation greatly exceeds accumulation. The delicacy of this balance is further demonstrated by the fact that a relatively thin, high-albedo layer is all that is required to prevent sub-surface melting.