Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:19:29.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Space missions: psychological and psychopathological issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2021

Donatella Marazziti*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy Unicamillus-Saint Camillus International University of Medical and Health Sciences, Rome, Italy
Alessandro Arone
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
Tea Ivaldi
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
Konstantin Kuts
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Psychoneurology, Institute for Clinical Radiology, State Institution, National Research Centre for Radiation Medicine, National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Konstantin Loganovsky
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Psychoneurology, Institute for Clinical Radiology, State Institution, National Research Centre for Radiation Medicine, National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
*
*Author for correspondence: Donatella Marazziti, MD, Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Exploring space is one of the most attractive goals that humanity ever set, notwithstanding, there are some psychological and psychopathological risks that should be considered. Several studies identified some possible hazards of space travels and related physical and psychological consequences on astronauts. If some psychological reactions are obviously inherent to the characteristics of the spaceships (habitability, confinement, psychological, and interpersonal relationships), other (disturbances of sleep-wake cycle, personality changes, depression, anxiety, apathy, psychosomatic symptoms, neurovestibular problems, alterations in cognitive function, and sensory perception) represent a clear warning of possible central nervous system (CNS) alterations, possibly due to microgravity and cosmic radiation. Such conditions and eventual CNS changes might compromise the success of missions and the ability to cope with unexpected events and may lead to individual and long-term impairments. Therefore, further studies are needed, perhaps, requiring the birth of a novel branch of psychology/psychiatry that should not only consider the risks related to space exploration, but the implementation of targeted strategies to prevent them.

Type
Editorial
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

The history of human beings is accompanied by a constant drive to overcome the limits intrinsic to their nature, like the possibility to fly. As such, it is paved by continuous attempts to accomplish this goal throughout the millennia, from the Icarus’ myth to the flying machines of Da Vinci until the first airplane built by Wright brothers. The 20th century was a unique century for the extraordinary developments of flying aircrafts for both war and civil use, as well as for the beginning of space exploration that started in 1944 with the V2 rocket. The soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin was the first man to be launched into the space on the 12th of April 1961, a date that gave birth to the space race.Reference Vernikos 1 Soviet Union was soon followed by the United States with the renowned Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programs that led Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin to land on the Moon. Different dates in the following years mark some relevant milestones in the history of space missions, important for present and future space travels. In 1970, the U.S. Apollo 13 mission aimed to land on the Moon for the third time, but during the trip, the spacecraft was damaged and the purpose of the mission was to bring the three astronauts back. In 1971, the USSR launched its first space station, Salyut-1, as a short-lived space laboratory that laid the foundations for subsequent stations and medical investigations of astronauts, followed by the U.S. first space station, Skylab, a top of a Saturn V rocket, in 1973. This served as a solar and terrestrial observatory and as a microgravity and medical laboratory.Reference Dubinin, Vaulina and Kosikov 2 In 1981, the shuttle Columbia orbiter left its pad at Kennedy space center during the transportation system (STS-1) mission, while heraldeing the beginning of a new era of spaceships that could be reused. 3 The next STS missions played an important role in implementing biological studies.Reference Mao, Pecaut and Stodieck 4 The base block of MIR, a Soviet modular space station, was put in orbit in 1986 and about a month later was joined by its first crew. Although it served primarily as a test for space hardware, more than 100 astronauts from different nations carried out extensive scientific research, especially on the effects of microgravity on living organisms.Reference Savelyeva, Allakhverdov and Lawler 5 The two nations ended up forming a successful collaboration over the years that still continues on the international space station (ISS) that represents a unique environment for the study of long-term space missions.

Several countries have then rapidly shown a keen interest in space missions, so that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), in collaboration with space agencies from all over the world, is currently planning the Artemis program that is the return of men to the Moon and, in particular, of the first woman. These and other space missions will provide additional foundations to missions primarily planned to reach Mars, included in the NASA projects for the next decade. 6

Space has long been considered a hostile environment able to provoke several detrimental consequences on human physiology that may lead not only to medical diseases, but also to psycho(patho)logical conditions.Reference Kanas 7 Reference Kandarpa, Schneider and Ganapathy 13 Maintaining an adequate psychological well-being is, therefore, a crucial and untold task for astronauts, as several factors can hinder it. These can be grouped in physical, habitability factors, and individual or interpersonal psychological factors, and will be briefly reviewed herein.Reference Kanas 14 , Reference Kanas and Manzey 15

Physical factors

Microgravity, radiation, and habitability stand among the most studied physical parameters with evidence of their potentially negative consequences.

Microgravity

Although the full effects of microgravity on human physiology are still unclear and mainly derived from simulation studies, evidence suggests that it might impact cell structure and differentiation, and both the immune and central nervous system (CNS).Reference Woods and Chapes 16 , Reference Gridley, Slater and Luo-Owen 17 Indeed, the CNS needs to adapt to microgravity since different somatosensory, visual, and vestibular informations have to be elaborated.Reference Souvestre, Blaber and Landrock 18 A syndrome known as space adaptation syndrome may occur as a consequence of a sensory conflict between inputs from visual and tactile senses and vestibular organs.Reference Lackner and Dizio 19 Furthermore, microgravity can lead to some changes in cognitive functioning, as demonstrated by a reduction in some motor functions (ie, dual-tasking, motion perception, and manual dexterity) in a small sample of eight astronauts following a 6-month period spent on ISS that, however, disappeared four days after landing.Reference Moore, Dilda and Morris 20

Radiation

There is now a general agreement that space radiation represents a further risk during space missions and, interestingly, NASA shows a huge concern on this matter.Reference Cucinotta, Alp and Sulzman 21 The global radiation dose for astronauts is deeply affected by galactic cosmic rays (GCR) originating from outside the solar system and including alpha particles, protons, and high-energy, heavier nuclei components of the former that are called high atomic number and energy (HZE).Reference Mewaldt 22 , Reference Patel 23 As GCR interact with the shielding material of a space shuttle, a large emission of secondary neutrons may follow, thus potentially impinging on the bodies of cosmonauts.Reference Slaba, Blattnig and Norbury 24 Furthermore, pulses of heavy ion and energetic proton radiation may be the result of solar particle events, including coronal mass ejections and solar flares.Reference Zeitlin, Hassler and Cucinotta 25 Along with electromagnetic field and weightlessness, radiation may lead to several CNS changes, such as shifts in brain fluids, altered sensory perception, and neurovestibular problems.Reference Newberg and Alavi 26 Data from rodent models reported modifications of the CA1 superficial layer pyramidal neurons in the dorsal hippocampus, that may persist after 6 months from the irradiation.Reference Acharya, Baulch and Klein 27 This caused learning and memory impairment, as well as increased anxiety behaviors also indicating damage of the amygdala and of some cortical neurons.Reference Parihar, Allen and Tran 28 , Reference Parihar, Allen and Caressi 29 Moreover, astronauts may undergo deficits in executive functions and decision-making due to a functional loss in the medial prefrontal cortex, posterior and anterior cingulate, and basal forebrain.Reference Acharya, Baulch and Klein 27 , Reference Lonart, Parris and Johnson 30 Indeed, it is a common assumption that one out of five astronauts taking part in a long space mission would experience similar behaviors, and out of three would instead face struggles in memory processes.Reference Acharya, Baulch and Klein 27 Radiation exposure may also be one of the determinants of visual disturbances. During the Apollo, Skylab, and MIR missions, astronauts observed flashes of light, of different shapes, moving across the visual field.Reference Sannita, Narici and Picozza 31 Such flashes were more often present before sleep, predominantly white, with elongated shapes and often accompanied by senses of movement perceived as lateral, diagonal or in-out.Reference Fuglesang, Narici and Picozza 32 It has been suggested that these phosphenes can be a consequence of an alteration in perception caused by ionizing radiation on the eye.Reference Narici 33

Habitability

Several factors of “habitability”, a term used with reference to the main characteristics of the spacecraft, may contribute to the overall well-being of astronauts, while including light, noise, vibration, and temperature.Reference Kanas and Manzey 15 , Reference Musso, Ferraris, Fenoglio, Stanton, Landry and Di Bucchianico 34 The light represents the main stimulus of the circadian rhythms that can be deeply affected by changes in luminosity. Therefore, it has been suggested to remove the light from the settings and the spaces dedicated to sleep, or to create an environment with alternating light and dark in the spaces shared by the astronauts.Reference Caddick, Gregory, Flynn-Evans, Stanton, Landry and Di Bucchianico 35 Excessive exposure to noise, mainly due to the equipment and the crew activities, may represent another stressor compromising wakefulness and sleeping, so that cosmonauts have been instructed to wear protection devices.Reference Limardo, Allen and Danielson 36

Whole-body vibration may represent another harmful factor due to the risk of spinal and extremity injuries.Reference O’Conor, Dalal and Ramachandran 37 Finally, habitability includes the need for privacy that may not be always sufficiently respected.Reference Winisdoerffer and Soulez-Larivière 38

Psychological factors

The peculiarities of life during long space missions, specifically isolation and interpersonal relationships may represent stressors leading to psychological/psychosocial problems or even to psychopathological symptoms or disorders.

Individual issues

Isolation from family, friends, and the life on the Earth, coupled with hard work continuously monitored, represent some factors of potential psychological distress.Reference Kandarpa, Schneider and Ganapathy 13 During isolation, memory and concentration deficits may occur, along with an increase in the likelihood of making errors and a decrease in reaction times.Reference Sipes, Polk, Beven, Nicogossian, Williams and Huntoon 39 Long space missions can also induce cosmonauts to monotony that may worsen other psychological stressors, thus potentially leading to impaired performance and behaviors.Reference Peldszus, Dalke and Pretlove 40 Furthermore, since crew activities become progressively part of a routine, an increase in free time and a greater likelihood of asthenia, withdrawal, and territorial behavior may follow.Reference Kanas 41

Interpersonal issues

During a space mission, the mental well-being of an astronaut can be affected by factors related to the relationships with other crew members, especially when they are heterogeneous. These may provoke tension, loosening of the team cohesion, subgrouping, scapegoating, communication issues, the creation of a competitive environment and uncertainty regarding individual roles.Reference Kanas 7 The relationships between cosmonauts and ground control are also important, as conflicts may arise for disparate reasons, such as delays in communication, ranging from minimal delays to around 24 minutes from the most distant planets, caused by the distance from Earth.Reference Gushin, Zaprisa and Kolinitchenko 42 , Reference Bell, Brown and Mitchell 43

Psychopathological issues

The presence of loss of or reduced sleep quality is a critical issue among astronauts, as it may provoke fatigue, concentration problems and possible drop in overall performance levels leading to potentially damaging errors.Reference Buckey 44 , Reference Pandi-Perumal and Gonfalone 45 The duration of astronauts’ sleep seems to be reduced to around 6 to 6.5 hours/day during missions,Reference Gundel, Nalishiti and Reucher 46 Reference Dijk, Neri and Wyatt 48 in parallel with a decreased amount of both slow-wave and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and a shortening of REM latency.Reference Gundel, Nalishiti and Reucher 46 The impact of sleep is highlighted by the results of a ground-based simulation of a mission to Mars involving six individuals isolated for 520 days. Most subjects experienced recurrent reductions in perceived sleep quality, interrupted sleep–wake periodicity, performance deficits associated with chronic partial sleep deprivation, and increased sleep displacement in the daytime period.Reference Basner, Dinges and Mollicone 49 Not surprisingly, the use of hypnotics during flight is common, as demonstrated in a study on the crew of a shuttleReference Barger, Flynn-Evans and Kubey 50 : approximately three quarters of the crew reported taking hypnotics, mainly zolpidem and its extended-release formulation or temazepam.Reference Putcha, Berens and Marshburn 51 , Reference Wotring 52 Although, while comparing nights with and without a sleeping pill, no difference was present in total sleep time and night-time alertness, significant differences were found in sleep efficiency, latency and, albeit slightly, subjective quality.Reference Barger, Flynn-Evans and Kubey 50

It has been hypothesized that extreme environments, like the space, despite their diversity, are a similar potential threat to mental conditions, and specific factors have been proposed that could play a role in the occurrence of psychological and psychic problems among astronauts. A review of data on Arctic confinement showed that personality traits, coping styles, and interpersonal needs are important predictors of depressed mood.Reference Palinkas, Gunderson and Johnson 53 During space missions, prolonged and severe isolation seems to correlate with the onset of reduced resilience, apathy, boredom, depression, anxiety, and declines in initiative, general activity and desire.Reference Gushin, Kholin and Ivanovsky 54 , Reference Tafforin, Vinokhodova and Chekalina 55 Several psychosomatic symptoms have been also described among astronauts during missions, such as headaches, gastroenteric problems, genitourinary symptoms, and fear of illness.Reference Weybrew 56 Reference Clark 58 The issue of asthenia as a problematic syndrome during space missions is quite common, but still unresolved.Reference Kanas, Salnitskiy and Gushin 59 Despite the fact that abundant nutritional resources are available during missions and there is no increase in energy consumption, astronauts may experience a reduction in their food intake, a phenomenon known as anorexia in space. The cosmonauts’ weight loss and reduction in body mass appear to be linked to the influence of microgravity and to changes in the sleep–wake cycle on appetite, food intake, and the functioning of the gastrointestinal system. However, after returning to Earth, the crew members will regain their preflight levels of body mass and caloric intake.Reference Da Silva, Zimmerman and Meguid 60 It has been suggested that the continuous light environment of space missions is the cause of the reduction in caloric intake to 70% of that recommended.Reference Varma, Sato and Zhang 61

Finally, the isolation occuring during the missions seems to provoke some psychopathological disorders in the astronauts, such as illusions, hallucinations, and reductions in consciousness. In fact, in situations of sensory deprivation, misrecognition can be a consequence of lack of training and incorrect perception of a stimulus.Reference Gushin, Kholin and Ivanovsky 54 It is interesting to note that in 2011, the Russian newspaper Pravda reported the presence of olfactory hallucinations among the crew who took part in the 1984 Soyuz T-10 to Salyut-7 missions, but the presence of toxins in the station’s atmosphere was cited as the main cause of this phenomenon.Reference Troitsyna 62

It should be, however, mentioned that space missions do not necessarily may lead to negative consequences, as they may represent personal growth experiences for many individuals, so that they might promote the overall sense of well-being, similarly to other isolation experiences.Reference Kanas and Manzey 15 , Reference Suedfeld, Legkaia and Brcic 63

Psychological aftermath following return on Earth

The evidence of psychological or mental disorders after space missions is weak, if compared with current knowledge about problems arising during the space missions. The careful selection and the psychological screening of cosmonauts operated in the initial phases may explain the apparent lack of evidence. However, it should be noted that up to 5% of the crews of Antarctic expeditions, an environment that shares similar characteristics with the space, may experience psychiatric disorders, including mood disorders.Reference Friedman and Bui 64 Further, the careful psychological and psychiatric screening performed on astronauts does not predict the absence of behavioral and psychological problems after the missions.Reference Sandal, Leon and Vakoch 65

In any case, return on Earth can be stressful and demanding for reasons such as re-joining to an open society and to the family after a period in a small environment.Reference Ursin, Comet and Soulez-Larivière 66 The first 2 weeks after returning to Earth represent a particularly critical period in which negative effects on mood and performance can be expected, induced by changes in gravity and general living conditions, that is, readjustment to Earth.Reference Manzey, Lorenz and Poljakov 67 Interestingly, confrontations in the form of either aggressive or assertive interactions in order to resolve a situation have been more frequently reported after space flight, albeit seldom indicated in the course of the mission in a research involving a group of retired cosmonauts.Reference Suedfeld, Brcic and Johnson 68

The most frequent psychological and psychosocial issues reported include depressive symptoms, substance abuse, jealousy and conjugal problems, and divorces.Reference Flynn 8 Reference Suedfeld 10

Conclusions

Space exploration is a fascinating human goal that, however, entails a series of hazards with detrimental physical and psychological consequences. Therefore, the issue of psychological well-being and mental health of astronauts has been included in the Human Research Program at NASA that, in 2016, delivered some general guidelines on this topic. The stringent selection criteria of candidates are considered the most important prevention countermeasure during both prelaunch and training phases. The psychotherapeutic support during the mission and upon return to the Earth is also suggested to represent another valid instrument to be provided not only to the the crews, but even to their families/relatives. The possibility of psychiatric emergencies has also been considered, and antidepressants, anxiolytics, antipsychotics, and even physical restraint tools are now available on the ISS.

Although it should be underlined that the available data are still limited and mainly deriving from studies from Earth environments similar to space, nevertheless the mounting interest and implementation of future and long-lasting space missions warn and require appropriate awareness of all the risks that these flights pose to the CNS of the crews, that have been documented in a few magnetic resonance studies.Reference Alperin, Bagci and Lee 69 Reference Buoite Stella, Ajčević and Furlanis 71

Further studies are urgently needed in this field given the renewed interest and fundings of space exploration, including the Moon landing of the first woman in 2024 (Artemis Project of NASA), and the exploration of Mars and beyond. These exciting programs represent a challenge possibly requiring the birth of a novel branch of psychology/psychiatry devoted to the implementation of targeted strategies to possibly prevent risks related to space exploration and to ensure the maintenance of well-being among astronauts during and after their missions.

Disclosures

Donatella Marazziti, Alessandro Arone, Tea Ivaldi, Konstantin Kuts, and Konstantin Loganovsky have no disclosures, and they have no affiliation with or financial interest in any organization that might pose a conflict of interest.

References

Vernikos, J. Human exploration of space: why, where, what for? Hippokratia. 2008;12(1):69.Google Scholar
Dubinin, NP, Vaulina, EN, Kosikov, KV, et al. Effects of space flight factors on the heredity of higher and lower plants. Life Sci Space Res. 1973;11:105110.Google ScholarPubMed
Mao, XW, Pecaut, MJ, Stodieck, LS, et al. Biological and metabolic response in STS-135 space-flown mouse skin. Free Radic Res. 2014;48(8):890897. doi:10.3109/10715762.2014.920086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savelyeva, E, Allakhverdov, A, Lawler, A. Mir space station Fiery demise spells end of longest research run. Science. 2001;291(5510):1891. doi:10.1126/science.291.5510.1891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA’s Journey to Mars—Pioneering Next Steps in Space Exploration. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2015. NP-2015-08-2018-HQ.Google Scholar
Kanas, N. Psychosocial issues affecting crews during long-duration international space missions. Acta Astronaut. 1998;42(1–8):339361. doi:10.1016/s0094-5765(98)00130-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flynn, CF. An operational approach to long-duration mission behavioral health and performance factors. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005;76(Suppl 6):B42B51.Google ScholarPubMed
Shepanek, M. Human behavioral research in space: Quandaries for research subjects and researchers. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005;76(Suppl 6):B25B30.Google ScholarPubMed
Suedfeld, P. Invulnerability, coping, salutogenesis, integration: Four phases of space psychology. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005;76(Suppl 6):B61B66.Google ScholarPubMed
Trappe, S, Costill, D, Gallagher, P, et al. Exercise in space: human skeletal muscle after 6 months aboard the International Space Station. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2009;106(4):11591168. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.91578.2008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitts, RH, Trappe, SW, Costill, DL, et al. Prolonged space flight-induced alterations in the structure and function of human skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 2010;588(Pt 18):35673592. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2010.188508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kandarpa, K, Schneider, V, Ganapathy, K. Human health during space travel: an overview. Neurol India. 2019;67:S176S181. doi:10.4103/0028-3886.259123.Google ScholarPubMed
Kanas, N. Psychiatric issues affecting long duration space missions. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1998;69(12):12111216.Google ScholarPubMed
Kanas, N, Manzey, D. Space Psychology and Psychiatry. 2nd ed. . Dordrecht: Springer; 2008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, KM, Chapes, SK. Abrogation of TNF-mediated cytotoxicity by space flight involves protein kinase C. Exp Cell Res. 1994;211(1):171174. doi:10.1006/excr.1994.1074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gridley, DS, Slater, JM, Luo-Owen, X, et al. Spaceflight effects on T lymphocyte distribution, function and gene expression. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2009;106(1):194202. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.91126.2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souvestre, P, Blaber, A, Landrock, C. Space motion sickness: the sensory motor controls and cardiovascular correlation. Acta Astronaut. 2008;63:745757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackner, JR, Dizio, P. Space motion sickness. Exp Brain Res. 2006;175(3):377399. doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0697-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, ST, Dilda, V, Morris, TR, et al. Long-duration spaceflight adversely affects post-landing operator proficiency. Sci Rep. 2019;9:2677. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-39058-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cucinotta, FA, Alp, M, Sulzman, FM, et al. Space radiation risks to the central nervous system. Life Sci Space Res. 2014;2:5459. doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2014.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mewaldt, RA. Galactic cosmic ray composition and energy spectra. Adv Space Res. 1994;14(10):737747. doi:10.1016/0273-1177(94)90536-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, S. The effects of microgravity and space radiation on cardiovascular health: from low-Earth orbit and beyond. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020;30:100595. doi:10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100595.Google ScholarPubMed
Slaba, TC, Blattnig, SR, Norbury, JW, et al. GCR simulator reference field and a spectral approach for laboratory simulation. NASA Technical Paper. 2015.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, C, Hassler, DM, Cucinotta, FA, et al. Measurements of energetic particle radiation in transit to Mars on the Mars Science Laboratory. Science. 2013;340(6136):10801084. doi:10.1126/science.1235989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newberg, AB, Alavi, A. Changes in the central nervous system during long-duration space flight: implications for neuro-imaging. Adv Space Res. 1998;22(2):185196. doi:10.1016/s0273-1177(98)80010-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acharya, MM, Baulch, JE, Klein, PM, et al. New concerns for neurocognitive function during deep space exposures to chronic, low dose-rate, neutron radiation [published correction appears in eNeuro. 2019 Oct 18;6(5):]. eNeuro. 2019;6(4):ENEURO.0094-19.2019. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0094-19.2019.Google Scholar
Parihar, VK, Allen, B, Tran, KT, et al. What happens to your brain on the way to Mars. Sci Adv. 2015;1(4):e1400256e1400256. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1400256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parihar, VK, Allen, BD, Caressi, C, et al. Cosmic radiation exposure and persistent cognitive dysfunction. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34774. doi:10.1038/srep34774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lonart, G, Parris, B, Johnson, AM, et al. Executive function in rats is impaired by low (20 cGy) doses of 1 GeV/u (56)Fe particles. Radiat Res. 2012;178(4):289294. doi:10.1667/rr2862.1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sannita, WG, Narici, L, Picozza, P. Positive visual phenomena in space: a scientific case and a safety issue in space travel. Vision Res. 2006;46(14):21592165. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuglesang, C, Narici, L, Picozza, P, et al. Phosphenes in low earth orbit: survey responses from 59 astronauts. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2006;77(4):449452.Google ScholarPubMed
Narici, L. Heavy ions light flashes and brain functions: recent observations at accelerators and in spaceflight. New J. Phys. 2008;10:075010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musso, G, Ferraris, S, Fenoglio, F, et al. Habitability issues in long duration space missions far from Earth. In: Stanton, N, Landry, S, Di Bucchianico, G, et al., eds. Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. Vol. 597, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Cham: Springer; 2018. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caddick, Z, Gregory, K, Flynn-Evans, EE. Sleep environment recommendations for future spaceflight vehicles. In: Stanton, N, Landry, S, Di Bucchianico, G, et al., eds. Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. Vol. 484, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Cham: Springer; 2017. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limardo, JG, Allen, CS, Danielson, RW. International Space Station (ISS) crewmember’s noise exposures from 2015 to present. Paper presented at: 47th International Conference on Environmental Systems ICES-2017; July 20, 2017; Charleston, SC.Google Scholar
O’Conor, DK, Dalal, S, Ramachandran, V, et al. Crew-friendly countermeasures against musculoskeletal injuries in aviation and spaceflight. Front Physiol. 2020;11:837. doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.00837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winisdoerffer, F, Soulez-Larivière, C. Habitability constraints/objectives for a Mars manned mission: Internal architecture considerations. Adv Space Res. 1992;12(1):315320. doi:10.1016/0273-1177(92)90299-d.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sipes, WE, Polk, JD, Beven, G, et al. Behavioral health and performance. In: Nicogossian, AE, Williams, RS, Huntoon, CL, et al., eds. Space Physiology and Medicine. 4th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2016:367389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peldszus, R, Dalke, H, Pretlove, S, et al. The perfect boring situation—addressing the experience of monotony during crewed deep space missions through habitability design. Acta Astronaut. 2014;94(1):262276. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.04.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanas, N. Psychosocial value of space simulation for extended spaceflight. Adv Space Biol Med. 1997;6:8191. doi:10.1016/s1569-2574(08)60078-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gushin, VI, Zaprisa, NS, Kolinitchenko, TB, et al. Content analysis of the crew communication with external communicants under prolonged isolation. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1997;68(12):10931098.Google ScholarPubMed
Bell, ST, Brown, SG, Mitchell, T. What we know about team dynamics for long-distance space missions: a systematic review of analog research. Front Psychol. 2019;10:811. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckey, JC. Space Physiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
Pandi-Perumal, SR, Gonfalone, AA. Sleep in space as a new medical frontier: the challenge of preserving normal sleep in the abnormal environment of space missions. Sleep Sci. 2016;9(1):14. doi:10.1016/j.slsci.2016.01.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gundel, A, Nalishiti, V, Reucher, E, et al. Sleep and circadian rhythm during a short space mission. Clin Investig. 1993;71(9):718724. doi:10.1007/BF00209726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monk, TH, Buysse, DJ, Billy, BD, et al. Sleep and circadian rhythms in four orbiting astronauts. J Biol Rhythms. 1998;3(3):188201. doi:10.1177/074873098129000039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, DJ, Neri, DF, Wyatt, JK, et al. Sleep, performance, circadian rhythms, and light-dark cycles during two space shuttle flights. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001;281(5):R1647R1664. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.2001.281.5.R1647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basner, M, Dinges, DF, Mollicone, D, et al. Mars 520-d mission simulation reveals protracted crew hypokinesis and alterations of sleep duration and timing [published correction appears in Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 12;110(7):2676]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(7):26352640. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212646110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barger, LK, Flynn-Evans, EE, Kubey, A, et al. Prevalence of sleep deficiency and use of hypnotic drugs in astronauts before, during, and after spaceflight: an observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(9):904912. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70122-X.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putcha, L, Berens, KL, Marshburn, TH, et al. Pharmaceutical use by U.S. astronauts on space shuttle missions. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999;70(7):705708.Google ScholarPubMed
Wotring, VE. Medication use by U.S. crewmembers on the International Space Station. FASEB J. 2015;29(11):44174423. doi:10.1096/fj.14-264838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palinkas, LA, Gunderson, EK, Johnson, JC, et al. Behavior and performance on long-duration spaceflights: evidence from analogue environments [published correction appears in Aviat Space Environ Med. 2002 Sep;73(9):940]. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2000;71(Suppl 9):A29A36.Google Scholar
Gushin, VI, Kholin, SF, Ivanovsky, YR. Soviet psychophysiological investigations of simulated isolation: some results and prospects. Adv Space Biol Med. 1993;3:514. doi:10.1016/s1569-2574(08)60093-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tafforin, C, Vinokhodova, A, Chekalina, A, et al. Correlation of etho-social and psycho-social data from “Mars-500” interplanetary simulation. Acta Astronaut. 2015;111:1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weybrew, BB. Impact of isolation upon personnel. JOEM. 1961; 3:290294.Google ScholarPubMed
Kanas, N. Psychological, psychiatric, and interpersonal aspects of long-duration space missions. J Spacecr Rockets. 1990;27(5):457463. doi:10.2514/3.26165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, J. A flight surgeon’s perspective on crew behavior and performance. Paper presented at: Workshop for Space Radiation Collaboration with BHP, Center for Advanced Space Studies; Sept. 2007.Google Scholar
Kanas, N, Salnitskiy, V, Gushin, V, et al. Asthenia--Does it exist in space? Psychosom Med. 2001;63(6):874880. doi:10.1097/00006842-200111000-00004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Da Silva, MS, Zimmerman, PM, Meguid, MM, et al. Anorexia in space and possible etiologies: an overview. Nutrition. 2002;18(10):805813. doi:10.1016/s0899-9007(02)00915-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varma, M, Sato, T, Zhang, L, et al. Space flight related anorexia. Lancet. 2000;356(9230):681. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)73828-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Troitsyna, M. Angels in space: Nothing but top-secret hallucinations. Pravda.ru. http://www.pravdareport.com/society/anomal/14-06-2011/118195-angels-0/. Accessed April, 2021.Google Scholar
Suedfeld, P, Legkaia, K, Brcic, J. Changes in the hierarchy of value references associated with flying in space. J Pers. 2010;78(5):14111435. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00656.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, E, Bui, B. A psychiatric formulary for long-duration spaceflight. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017;88(11):10241033. doi:10.3357/AMHP.4901.2017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandal, GM, Leon, GR. From the past to the future. In: Vakoch, DA, ed. Psychology of Space Exploration: Contemporary Research in Historical Perspective. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2011:195203.Google Scholar
Ursin, H, Comet, B, Soulez-Larivière, C. An attempt to determine the ideal psychological profiles for crews of long term space missions. Adv Space Res. 1992;12(1):301314. doi:10.1016/0273-1177(92)90298-c.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manzey, D, Lorenz, B, Poljakov, V. Mental performance in extreme environments: results from a performance monitoring study during a 438-day spaceflight. Ergonomics. 1998;41(4):537559. doi:10.1080/001401398186991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suedfeld, P, Brcic, J, Johnson, PJ, et al. Personal growth following long-duration space flight. Acta Astronaut. 2012;79:118123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alperin, N, Bagci, AM, Lee, SH. Spaceflight-induced changes in white matter hyperintensity burden in astronauts. Neurology. 2017;89(21):21872191. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, LA, Hasan, KM, Stenger, MB, et al. Intracranial effects of microgravity: a prospective longitudinal MRI study. Radiology. 2020;295(3):640648. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020191413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buoite Stella, A, Ajčević, M, Furlanis, G, et al. Neurophysiological adaptations to spaceflight and simulated microgravity. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021;132(2):498504. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2020.11.033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed