Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:41:11.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards planetary health systems: a manifesto for a revised quadruple aim for healthcare improvement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2024

Alessio Perilli
Affiliation:
Section of Hygiene, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
Andrea Adduci
Affiliation:
Section of Hygiene, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
Walter Ricciardi
Affiliation:
Section of Hygiene, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
Antonio Giulio de Belvis
Affiliation:
Interfaculty of Economics – Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy Clinical Pathways and Outcome Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italy
Chiara Cadeddu*
Affiliation:
Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
*
Corresponding author: Chiara Cadeddu; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Non-technical summary

Healthcare systems significantly impact the environment, which in turn affects human health. To address this, we propose to revise a popular framework for healthcare improvement, by introducing the advancement of planetary health (the health of both humans and the natural systems) among the aims that health systems should pursue. This approach suggests reducing medical service needs through disease prevention, minimizing environmental impacts, and supporting global efforts to protect planetary health. Practical applications to bring about these pathways are documented in the literature.

Technical summary

Restoring the health of the planet, with concurrent benefits for human civilization, is paramount. Healthcare systems play a crucial role in this regard, considering the environmental impact of health services. Widely recognized approaches to designing healthcare systems for the optimization of their performance are based on the pursuit of multiple aims, such as the Triple Aim and Quadruple Aim frameworks. The objective of this work is to revise the latter by substituting ‘Advance Planetary Health’ for ‘Improve Population Health’.

The objective of advancing planetary health supports all other pre-existing objectives: lowering costs, enhancing patient experience, team wellbeing, and population health, which directly relates to planetary health. Health systems promoting planetary health reduce the need for medical services through disease prevention and health promotion, pursue the provision of appropriate care, minimize the overall environmental impact of medical services, and support planetary health initiatives across all sectors and society. Multiple interconnected pathways exist to operationalize the above components.

A revised quadruple aim for healthcare improvement, aligned with social and economic goals of sustainable prosperity and wellbeing, may be a desirable step toward constructing planetary health systems capable of maximizing the health of humans and natural systems.

Social media summary

It's time for new ‘planetary health systems’: focusing on planetary health to enhance healthcare performance. #PlanetaryHealth #ClimateCrisis #HealthcareImprovement.

Type
Intelligence Briefing
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

1. Introduction

The current state of planetary health is alarming on multiple levels (Atwoli et al., Reference Atwoli, Baqui, Benfield, Bosurgi, Godlee, Hancocks, Horton, Laybourn-Langton, Monteiro, Norman, Patrick, Praities, Rikkert, Rubin, Sahni, Smith, Talley, Turale and Vázquez2021; McKay et al., Reference McKay, Staal, Abrams, Winkelmann, Sakschewski, Loriani, Fetzer, Cornell, Rockström and Lenton2022; Rockström et al., Reference Rockström, Gupta, Qin, Lade, Abrams, Andersen, Armstrong McKay, Bai, Bala, Bunn, Ciobanu, DeClerck, Ebi, Gifford, Gordon, Hasan, Kanie, Lenton, Loriani and Zhang2023; Rocque et al., Reference Rocque, Beaudoin, Ndjaboue, Cameron, Poirier-Bergeron, Poulin-Rheault, Fallon, Tricco and Witteman2021). This translates into a pressing need to restore the health of the planet, symbiotically benefiting the health of the human civilization. Healthcare systems, through their environmental footprint, are themselves co-responsible for the progressive deterioration of planetary health, in terms of climate breakdown, air pollution, scarce water use, and biogeochemical flows (Lenzen et al., Reference Lenzen, Malik, Li, Fry, Weisz, Pichler, Chaves, Capon and Pencheon2020). The environmental disruptions to which they contribute ultimately damage human health (Eckelman et al., Reference Eckelman, Sherman and MacNeill2018, Reference Eckelman, Huang, Lagasse, Senay, Dubrow and Sherman2020a). Hence, they cannot be considered, by any means, exempt from the global effort to transition to sustainability, especially considering their overarching mission to improve health (Health Care Without Harm & Arup, 2019). Furthermore, they must be climate-resilient, anticipating, responding to, coping with, recovering from and adapting to environmental and climate-related shocks (WHO, 2015). This scenario underscores the necessity to revise health system goals and operations, integrating the objective of promoting the health of the planet as essential to enhancing human health. The immense scale and severity of challenges confronting healthcare systems today elevate environmental sustainability, which previously received fragmented attention and relied largely on commendable yet isolated initiatives by various stakeholders, to a pivotal role. Ultimately, promoting planetary health must become a common denominator for all care processes, from prevention to treatment.

An established approach to designing healthcare systems, in order to optimize their performance, consists in the pursuit of multiple aims. In 2008, Berwick and colleagues introduced the Triple Aim framework (Berwick et al., Reference Berwick, Nolan and Whittington2008) outlining three goals that a health system must pursue simultaneously: improving population health, enhancing the patient experience of care, and reducing per capita costs related to health care, with the latter two outlined as symmetrically complementing the former. The disruptive importance of the triple aim theory lies essentially in a paradigm shift related to optimizing care performance and the strategy for improving the quality of care. While with the second aim, the purely individual perspective of the patient care experience, focused on the care process itself (in line with the six ‘improvement goals’ proposed by the Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America: Safety, Effectiveness, Patient-Centeredness, Timeliness, Efficiency, Equity) (Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, 2001) remains, the first and third aims shift toward a systemic view.

Further versions emerged in 2014, with Bodenheimer and Sinsky's introduction of the Quadruple Aim (Bodenheimer & Sinsky, Reference Bodenheimer and Sinsky2014), and in 2022 with the inclusion of health equity in the framework (Nundy et al., Reference Nundy, Cooper and Mate2022).

Bodenheimer and Sisnski enriched the model with an additional component: improving care team well-being (Bodenheimer & Sinsky, Reference Bodenheimer and Sinsky2014). They identify the health care workforce burn-out as a disruptive element and a substantial obstacle to achieving patient-centeredness and triple aim. In fact, burn-out is linked to overutilization of resources with increased costs and worsening clinical outcomes.

The novel fifth aim, which proposes to advance health equity (Nundy et al., Reference Nundy, Cooper and Mate2022), highlights that quality improvement without equity represents a hollow victory. Accordingly, policymakers and practitioners ought to develop and put into practice evidence-based strategies to minimize health inequities, make investments in measuring them, and provide incentives.

The key question the most renowned Triple Aim framework attempts to answer is: what goals should a healthcare system strive for, from the perspective of the society it serves? The seemingly contradictory goals of improving population health and reducing per capita care costs suggest a revolutionary assumption of responsibility by the healthcare system. In a world with finite resources, the needs and well-being of the population extend beyond the boundaries of healthcare, necessitating an emphasis on social determinants of health such as education, housing, and transportation, to improve overall health and minimize disparities. This declaration of responsibility, thus, implies a moral obligation for health systems to combat the current climate and environmental crisis, which poses significant threats to global health and well-being. Population health inevitably depends on the health of Earth's natural systems: the climate crisis, among other planetary health crises, has a significant impact on human health. Rising temperatures increase heat-related mortality and morbidity, while increased frequency and intensity of storms result in increased injury, death, and psychological stressors (Romanello et al., Reference Romanello, Napoli, Drummond, Green, Kennard, Lampard, Scamman, Arnell, Ayeb-Karlsson, Ford, Belesova, Bowen, Cai, Callaghan, Campbell-Lendrum, Chambers, van Daalen, Dalin, Dasandi and Costello2022). In all, 22–39% of the global population is projected to be out of the human climate niche by 2080–2100, if current climate policies persist (Lenton et al., Reference Lenton, Xu, Abrams, Ghadiali, Loriani, Sakschewski, Zimm, Ebi, Dunn, Svenning and Scheffer2023). Climate variability may impact the distribution and abundance of vertebrate host species, leading to an increase of vector-borne and zoonotic diseases (Haines & Ebi, Reference Haines and Ebi2019). Carbon emissions and climate breakdown also affect global health via multiple direct and indirect pathways, including effects on agriculture and nutrition, notably contributing to the global burden of disease (Smith et al., Reference Smith, Mueller, Springmann, Sulser, Garibaldi, Gerber, Wiebe and Myers2022; Weyant et al., Reference Weyant, Brandeau, Burke, Lobell, Bendavid and Basu2018). Parallelly, air pollution, which largely shares both sources and solutions with the climate crisis (Campbell-Lendrum et al., Reference Campbell-Lendrum, Neville, Schweizer and Neira2023), is linked to a variety of health outcomes (WHO, 2021), with 6.67 million deaths attributed to it in 2019 (Fuller et al., Reference Fuller, Landrigan, Balakrishnan, Bathan, Bose-O'Reilly, Brauer, Caravanos, Chiles, Cohen, Corra, Cropper, Ferraro, Hanna, Hanrahan, Hu, Hunter, Janata, Kupka, Lanphear and Yan2022). Furthermore, recent evidence suggests an association between PM2.5 and clinical antibiotic resistance, which itself represents a major challenge for health systems as well as a threat to public health (Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Shuai, Lin, Yu, Ba, Holmes, Xiao, Gu and Chen2023). Consistent with the ‘do no harm’ principle of medical professionals and ethical foundations, there can be no goal of health systems that does not take into account the effects that health interventions have on the environment.

Environmental sustainability of healthcare systems has been at the center of scientific debate for several years now. Scientific evidence and individual initiatives to improve the sustainability of healthcare interventions by healthcare organizations, at multiple levels, are numerous (Cook et al., Reference Cook, Goodwin, Porter and Collins2023; Keil et al., Reference Keil, Viere, Helms and Rogowski2023; Patel et al., Reference Patel, Turner, Alishahi Tabriz, Gonzalez, Oswald, Nguyen, Hong, Jim, Nichols, Wang, Robinson, Naso and Spiess2023; Sala et al., Reference Sala, Alcamo and Nelli2017; Somner et al., Reference Somner, Stone, Koukkoulli, Scott, Field and Zygmunt2008; Storz, Reference Storz2020). Indeed, it is now recognized that environmental impacts should be considered when measuring the value of health care. For example, sustainability in quality improvement (SusQI) is a framework that assesses the quality and value of health care not only through the lens of economic sustainability, but also that of social and environmental sustainability (Stanford et al., Reference Stanford, Barna, Gupta and Mortimer2023).

Though environmental sustainability has been suggested as an additional objective within a sextuple aim framework (Alami et al., Reference Alami, Lehoux, Miller, Shaw and Fortin2023), we stress that human health is inherently intertwined with the health of natural systems. For health systems, the primary objective of enhancing population health, as put forth by the Triple Aim framework, cannot be detached from a contextual and targeted action to preserve planetary health. By revisiting the first objective of the Quadruple Aim and enriching it with the more comprehensive notion of planetary health – ‘a solutions-oriented, transdisciplinary field and social movement focused on analyzing and addressing the impacts of human disruptions to Earth's natural systems on human health and all life on Earth’ (Planetary Health Alliance, n.d.) – we could provide a theoretical framework within which health systems can prioritize the array of activities aimed at mitigation of and adaptation to the multiple threats to earth system stability. This theoretical framework reflects a systemic approach that does not merely provide healthcare systems with the objective of promoting environmental sustainability (as suggested in the sextuple aim model), but rather, sustainability becomes a means through which to achieve the primary goal of any healthcare system: promoting and restoring health (both of the population and the planet).

The centrality of such a significant goal (and responsibility) is evident in how it decisively integrates and supports the pursuit of other objectives, from reducing healthcare costs to prioritizing the patient and their perspective in the care process, to enhancing the well-being of the care team. Continuous improvement in the quality of healthcare in the 21st century cannot disregard the pursuit of planetary health objectives. Our framework compellingly encompasses the wide-ranging aspects of the role of health systems in transitioning to societies aligned with planetary boundaries, propelling them to the core of the planetary health movement. Indeed, such a comprehensive approach, while holding healthcare systems fully accountable to their patients, their natural interlocutors, may generate mutual benefits in the interaction with other sectors, notably the economic sector, thus acting as a catalyst for comprehensive societal change.

2. Advancing planetary health as an aim for healthcare improvement

A health system that advances planetary health requires a systems-thinking approach, based on four main principles, contributing to tackling the current crisis of value and purpose that affects health systems worldwide (Larsson et al., Reference Larsson, Clawson and Howard2023): decreasing the demand for health services through health promotion and disease prevention; pursuing the delivery of appropriate care; abating the overall environmental footprint of health services (MacNeill et al., Reference MacNeill, McGain and Sherman2021); endorsing planetary health action across other sectors and the overall society (Karliner et al., Reference Karliner, Roschnik, Boyd, Ashby and Steele2021) (Figure 1).

Figure 1. A revised quadruple aim for healthcare improvement, centered on the advancement of planetary health.

In relation to the first principle, evidence-based health promotion and disease prevention programs, powered by engaging stakeholders from multiple sectors (Claflin & Aloia, Reference Claflin and Aloia2010), alleviate disease burden (Bandosz et al., Reference Bandosz, Ahmadi-Abhari, Guzman-Castillo, Pearson-Stuttard, Collins, Whittaker, Shipley, Capewell, Brunner and O'Flaherty2020; Rasella et al., Reference Rasella, Harhay, Pamponet, Aquino and Barreto2014; Soltani et al., Reference Soltani, Saraf-Bank, Basirat, Salehi-Abargouei, Mohammadifard, Sadeghi, Khosravi, Fadhil, Puska and Sarrafzadegan2021; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Hu, Zhao, Kuang, Zhao, Liu and Zhu2021) and, consequently, its environmental footprint (Bi & Hansen, Reference Bi and Hansen2018). Smart governance for health and wellbeing provides the framework for such an intense cross-sectoral cooperation to thrive (Kickbusch & Gleicher, Reference Kickbusch and Gleicher2012). Additionally, 16.4% of the world population is projected to be 65 years or older by 2050, nearly doubling the current share (Gerland et al., Reference Gerland, Hertog, Wheldon, Kantorova, Gu, Gonnella, Williams, Zeifman, Bay, Castanheira, Kamiya, Bassarsky, Gaigbe-Togbe and Spoorenberg2022), which is likely to push demand for health services even further. Investing in public health interventions is deemed an effective way to put a cap on this process, thus allowing health systems to effectively deliver services still needed, while curbing not only their attributable footprint on natural systems but also economic, social and personal costs (Masters et al., Reference Masters, Anwar, Collins, Cookson and Capewell2017; McDaid, Reference McDaid2018). Despite that, across countries belonging to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, preventive care expenditure accounted for just 0.24% of gross domestic product and 2.59% of current health expenditure in 2019, on average (OECD, 2023). Interventions addressing tobacco, meat consumption, obesity, and air pollution are projected to save approximately 1.5 gigatons of CO2e from 2014 to 2050 (Karliner et al., Reference Karliner, Roschnik, Boyd, Ashby and Steele2021). The push for integrated public health policies must address the challenges presented by short-sighted public systems and private healthcare systems in which diseases can unfortunately be perceived as revenue generators (McDaid, Reference McDaid2018; Missoni & Galindo, Reference Missoni and Galindo2020).

The second principle consists in delivering appropriate healthcare that responds to health needs according to evidence-based practice. This entails the cessation of superfluous exams and prescriptions (Kherad & Carneiro, Reference Kherad and Carneiro2022), as well as service delivery in the most efficient setting. Hospital care, which is intrinsically energy- and resource-intensive, has a larger carbon footprint than primary care (Malik et al., Reference Malik, Lenzen, McAlister and McGain2018; Nicolet et al., Reference Nicolet, Mueller, Paruta, Boucher and Senn2022; Pichler et al., Reference Pichler, Jaccard, Weisz and Weisz2019; Tennison et al., Reference Tennison, Roschnik, Ashby, Boyd, Hamilton, Oreszczyn, Owen, Romanello, Ruyssevelt, Sherman, Smith, Steele, Watts and Eckelman2021). Hence, striving to limit hospitalizations through appropriate care, ensuring accessibility and continuity across primary and community care settings, within the framework of secondary and tertiary prevention community-based programs, is in turn beneficial to the environment, as opposed to frequent hospital accesses, resulting from inadequate and chaotic care. Healthcare systems with Beveridge models and ex-ante reimbursement strategies tend to favor appropriate care, given the need to contain expenditure, whereas it may undermine profitability in private health care. Professionals' culture, specific patient requests, conflicts of interest, and care fragmentation all have a role in over-prescribing and over-treatment (Missoni & Galindo, Reference Missoni and Galindo2020).

The third principle is concerned with reducing the environmental impact of the high-value health services still needed to meet population health needs. The main production sectors responsible for that encompass energy supply, operational emissions, manufacturing, agriculture, and transport (Health Care Without Harm, 2019). Assessments of the healthcare environmental impact have been conducted on national and global scales, much as further methodological improvements are warranted (Eckelman et al., Reference Eckelman, Romanello, Sherman and Watts2020b; Steenmeijer et al., Reference Steenmeijer, Rodrigues, Zijp and der Loop2022). Globally, the environmental footprint of health care amounts to 4.4% of greenhouse gas emissions, 2.8% of particulate matter, 3.4% of nitrogen oxides, and 3.6% of sulfur dioxide (Lenzen et al., Reference Lenzen, Malik, Li, Fry, Weisz, Pichler, Chaves, Capon and Pencheon2020).

Lastly, health systems are in a strong position to steer societies and economies toward planetary health goals. Intensive climate action would lead to large health co-benefits (Campbell-Lendrum et al., Reference Campbell-Lendrum, Neville, Schweizer and Neira2023; Whitmee et al., Reference Whitmee, Green, Belesova, Hassan, Cuevas, Murage, Picetti, Clercq-Roques, Murray, Falconer, Anton, Reynolds, Waddington, Hughes, Spadaro, Jaber, Saheb, Campbell-Lendrum, Cortés-Puch and Haines2024) and thoroughly accomplish the system's mission. Health systems with a strong commitment to environmental sustainability can exert a guidance role, influencing other companies and the civil society, while leveraging their remarkable purchasing power (Howard et al., Reference Howard, MacNeill, Hughes, Alqodmani, Charlesworth, de Almeida, Harris, Jochum, Maibach, Maki, McGain, Miller, Nirmala, Pencheon, Robertson, Sherman, Vipond, Yin and Montgomery2023). Societies and economies, in turn, striving to operate within planetary boundaries, contribute to the health care's own sustainability and human health goals, as social and economic determinants improve and any-grade suppliers decarbonize. This influence is integral to a comprehensive process to augment and emphasize connections between health and other sectors.

3. How the planetary health goal contributes to other aims

The proposed aim of advancing planetary health contributes to each of the other interdependent aims (Bodenheimer & Sinsky, Reference Bodenheimer and Sinsky2014) (Figure 2). In fact, planetary health encompasses the health of human civilization, thus embracing the original aim of improving population health, while further expanding on it and acknowledging its being intertwined with the health of natural systems (Whitmee et al., Reference Whitmee, Haines, Beyrer, Boltz, Capon, de Souza Dias, Ezeh, Frumkin, Gong, Head, Horton, Mace, Marten, Myers, Nishtar, Osofsky, Pattanayak, Pongsiri, Romanelli and Yach2015).

Figure 2. How advancing planetary health contributes to other healthcare improvement aims.

While equity was proposed as an aim for healthcare improvement (Nundy et al., Reference Nundy, Cooper and Mate2022), applying an equity and social justice lens to issues being addressed is a cornerstone of planetary health. This concept was proposed in 2023 by Rockström et al., as a set of safe and just Earth system boundaries (ESBs) (Rockström et al., Reference Rockström, Gupta, Qin, Lade, Abrams, Andersen, Armstrong McKay, Bai, Bala, Bunn, Ciobanu, DeClerck, Ebi, Gifford, Gordon, Hasan, Kanie, Lenton, Loriani and Zhang2023). These boundaries aim to maintain the resilience and stability of the Earth system (safe ESBs) while minimizing human exposure to significant harm from Earth system changes, a necessary but not sufficient condition for justice (Rockström et al., Reference Rockström, Gupta, Qin, Pedde, Broadgate and Warszawski2021). The consideration of health equity is linked to the widespread exposure to significant harm from planetary crises, with greater impacts on vulnerable populations, exacerbating existing inequities in disease burdens and premature mortality, and potentially leading to social unrest (Friel, Reference Friel2022; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2023). As a matter of fact, the brunt of environmental disruptions is primarily felt by low-income countries and individuals as well as racial minorities, who contribute less to causing them (Deivanayagam et al., Reference Deivanayagam, English, Hickel, Bonifacio, Guinto, Hill, Huq, Issa, Mulindwa, Nagginda, de Sato, Selvarajah, Sharma and Devakumar2023; Gore, Reference Gore2020; Hickel et al., Reference Hickel, O'Neill, Fanning and Zoomkawala2022; Lenton et al., Reference Lenton, Xu, Abrams, Ghadiali, Loriani, Sakschewski, Zimm, Ebi, Dunn, Svenning and Scheffer2023; Vicedo-Cabrera et al., Reference Vicedo-Cabrera, Scovronick, Sera, Royé, Schneider, Tobias, Astrom, Guo, Honda, Hondula, Abrutzky, Tong, de Sousa Zanotti Stagliorio Coelho, Saldiva, Lavigne, Correa, Ortega, Kan, Osorio and Gasparrini2021). A foundation that ensures minimum access to basic needs, including health, for all humans, alongside a safe and just ESB ceiling of maximum allowed human pressure on biophysical domains, could constitute a safe and just ‘corridor’ over time (Rockström et al., Reference Rockström, Gupta, Qin, Lade, Abrams, Andersen, Armstrong McKay, Bai, Bala, Bunn, Ciobanu, DeClerck, Ebi, Gifford, Gordon, Hasan, Kanie, Lenton, Loriani and Zhang2023). Hence, the uneven distribution of the effects of planetary crises calls for just and equitable solutions to advance planetary health.

Planetary health interventions are also associated with cost reduction. Evidence suggests that both improving the environmental sustainability of healthcare facilities and disease prevention and health promotion lead to cost savings (Ashton et al., Reference Ashton, Schröder-Bäck, Clemens, Dyakova, Stielke and Bellis2020; Masters et al., Reference Masters, Anwar, Collins, Cookson and Capewell2017; McCullough, Reference McCullough2018; NHS England and NHS Improvement, 2022; Pisters et al., Reference Pisters, Bien, Dankner, Rubinstein and Sheriff2017; Storz, Reference Storz2020; Sullivan et al., Reference Sullivan, Petit, Reiter, Westrick, Hu, Dunn, Gulack, Shah, Dsida and Raval2023).

In terms of patient experience, several associations are highlighted. Patient experience is associated with preventive care (Doyle et al., Reference Doyle, Lennox and Bell2013) and nature exposure within the healthcare context (Tseung et al., Reference Tseung, Verweel, Harvey, Pauley and Walker2022; Weerasuriya et al., Reference Weerasuriya, Henderson-Wilson and Townsend2018). For example, having access to hospital green spaces significantly improves overall satisfaction with the facility, a sentiment shared by both patients and staff members alike (Kim et al., Reference Kim, Hwang, Lee and Corser2015; O'Hara et al., Reference O'Hara, Miller, Spinks, Seifert, Mills and Tuininga2022; Sadatsafavi et al., Reference Sadatsafavi, Walewski and Taborn2015).

Reducing unnecessary visits and exams and green delivery of drugs also enhance patient experience (El-Hallal et al., Reference El-Hallal, Shah, Nath, Eksambe, Theroux, Amlicke, Steele, Krief and Kothare2021; Kelendar et al., Reference Kelendar, Faisal and Mohammed2020; NHS, n.d.; Rizan et al., Reference Rizan, Das, Low, Harden, Groves, Flaherty, Welland and Bhutta2019). Patients aware of planetary health issues might find comfort in receiving care in facilities transitioning to environmentally sustainable processes.

Pursuing the promotion of planetary health also affects the wellbeing of health professionals. Accessing green spaces and reducing workload by avoiding unwarranted care are suggested as positive drivers of health and wellbeing in the healthcare community (Centre for Sustainable Healthcare, 2020; Marusic, Reference Marusic2023).

The climate breakdown is already impacting health in a myriad of ways, including by leading to death and illness from increasingly frequent extreme weather events, such as heatwaves, storms, and floods, the disruption of food systems, increases in zoonoses and food-, water-, and vector-borne diseases, and mental health issues. Health professionals are at the forefront of responding to these health impacts, and their own wellbeing is also affected by the changing climate. They are exposed to the same health risks as the general population, but they also face additional stressors, such as increased workload, longer working hours, and exposure to traumatic events (Agache et al., Reference Agache, Sampath, Aguilera, Akdis, Akdis, Barry, Bouagnon, Chinthrajah, Collins, Dulitzki, Erny, Gomez, Goshua, Jutel, Kizer, Kline, LaBeaud, Pali-Schöll, Perrett and Nadeau2022). As with patients, professionals with environmental values may find sustainable work practices more rewarding, easing potential discomfort and anxiety generated by the environmental footprint of their working practices. Further links, in this space, can be identified by reviewing the Covid-19 experience. Indeed, Covid-19 is regarded as an Anthropocene disease (O'Callaghan-Gordo & Antó, Reference O'Callaghan-Gordo and Antó2020), spurred by the degraded status of planetary health (Myers & Frumkin, Reference Myers and Frumkin2020). It heavily strained healthcare systems worldwide, with consequences being felt in terms of healthcare professionals' mental health, as well (Aymerich et al., Reference Aymerich, Pedruzo, Pérez, Laborda, Herrero, Blanco, Mancebo, Andrés, Estévez, Fernandez, Salazar de Pablo, Catalan and González-Torres2022; Galanis et al., Reference Galanis, Vraka, Fragkou, Bilali and Kaitelidou2021). Protecting the health of nature and humans through large-scale solutions may help avoid similar disastrous events and their wide-ranging aftermath (Myers & Frumkin, Reference Myers and Frumkin2020).

4. Pathways for health systems to advance planetary health

Aiming to foster planetary health as a health system operationally translates into a series of intertwined pathways (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Main principles and pathways to advancing planetary health as the leading aim for quality improvement in healthcare systems.

With regard to disease prevention and preventable disease burden, enablers can be identified in strong political dedication to public health priorities, effective institutional structures to guide and organize essential public health functions (EPHFs), multisectoral responsibility, assessment of the provision of EPHFs, sufficient workforce and funding (WHO, 2022a, 2022b). Given the increasing urbanization and the need to enhance disease prevention at the city level, political engagement, addressing urban determinants of health, policy debate and institutional reforms are demanded for the shift to health-promoting cities (WHO, 2020).

To increase care appropriateness, active multi-component initiatives proved their effectiveness in reducing unnecessary care (George & Joshi, Reference George and Joshi2022; Rose et al., Reference Rose, Crosbie and Stewart2021). Effective elements, either as single or multi-interventions, include care pathways, educational interventions, organizational culture, audit and feedback and reminders (Pereira et al., Reference Pereira, Silva, Carvalho, Zanghelini and Barreto2022). Policy statements and guidelines from associations, patient and physician education, leadership and peer support feature among the facilitators of the patient–planetary health co-benefit prescribing framework (Redvers et al., Reference Redvers, Wright, Hartmann-Boyce and Tonkin-Crine2023).

Pathways toward decarbonized and low-pollution healthcare broadly encompass green energy supply across both own operations and supply chain, decline in energy demand, professionals' behaviors change, shift to low-impact drugs and devices (Andersen et al., Reference Andersen, Nielsen and Sherman2023; Blom et al., Reference Blom, Eissa, Mattijsen, Sana, Haines and Whitmee2024; Keil et al., Reference Keil, Viere, Helms and Rogowski2023; Pernigotti et al., Reference Pernigotti, Stonham, Panigone, Sandri, Ferri, Unal and Roche2021), sustainable travel, telemedicine, optimal waste management, nature-based solutions, and low-impact food supply chains (Karliner et al., Reference Karliner, Roschnik, Boyd, Ashby and Steele2021; Purohit et al., Reference Purohit, Smith and Hibble2021). Promoting gender balance in healthcare management and leadership generally, reallocating environmentally damaging investments to planetary health solutions (Howard et al., Reference Howard, MacNeill, Hughes, Alqodmani, Charlesworth, de Almeida, Harris, Jochum, Maibach, Maki, McGain, Miller, Nirmala, Pencheon, Robertson, Sherman, Vipond, Yin and Montgomery2023), embedding carbon emissions into existing priority processes (Bhopal & Norheim, Reference Bhopal and Norheim2021), all fall under the scope of returning healthcare to a healthy balance with natural systems. In addition, integrating environmental information into Health Technology Assessment could help refine health system decision making about technologies or interventions. These decisions would be based on data on environmental effects as well as clinical outcomes and costs (Pinho-Gomes et al., Reference Pinho-Gomes, Yoo, Allen, Maiden, Shah and Toolan2022; Toolan et al., Reference Toolan, Walpole, Shah, Kenny, Jónsson, Crabb and Greaves2023).

The advocacy function of health systems spans leading by example through healthcare professionals' individual behaviors, signing treaties promoting the cessation of fossil fuels use and the spread of plant-based diets, the endorsement of institutional and national commitments to achieve net zero emissions in healthcare, including the implementation of procurement policies, of a 100% renewables energy strategy within nations, of ambitious nationally determined contributions complying with the Paris Agreement, of enhanced climate finance (Howard et al., Reference Howard, MacNeill, Hughes, Alqodmani, Charlesworth, de Almeida, Harris, Jochum, Maibach, Maki, McGain, Miller, Nirmala, Pencheon, Robertson, Sherman, Vipond, Yin and Montgomery2023).

The implementation of circular economy (CE) strategies could provide a significant boost toward achieving all four of the described aims (advancing planetary health, enhancing the patient experience of care, reducing costs in the long-term and improving care team well-being), thus playing a central role in improving the quality of healthcare. CE can be described as an economic system that supplants the traditional ‘end-of-life’ concept (‘take-make-waste’) by emphasizing the reduction, reuse, recycling, and recovery of materials throughout the production, distribution, and consumption processes (Kirchherr et al., Reference Kirchherr, Reike and Hekkert2017). The traditional linear model has been shown to be inherently unsustainable because large-scale production and consumption play a significant role in global environmental degradation, producing excess solid waste, greenhouse gases, and other harmful emissions (MacNeill et al., Reference MacNeill, Hopf, Khanuja, Alizamir, Bilec, Eckelman, Hernandez, McGain, Simonsen, Thiel, Young, Lagasse and Sherman2020). These effects threaten public health through air pollution, water and soil contamination, ozone layer depletion, biodiversity loss, and devastating climate change. The CE transformative concept, which strives to eliminate waste through the continual use of resources, is reshaping industries and business models across the board (Sohal & Vass, Reference Sohal and Vass2022), with the healthcare sector being no exception (Kane et al., Reference Kane, Bakker and Balkenende2017). In healthcare, CE is interpreted as an inclusive economic system that adopts the principles of designing out waste and pollution (Lansink, Reference Lansink2018; Stewart & Niero, Reference Stewart and Niero2018), keeping products and materials in use, and regenerating natural systems. These principles permeate all facets of healthcare, from the design and manufacture of medical devices and equipment to the operation of healthcare facilities and the management of health-related waste. A comprehensive and collaborative approach is key in successfully implementing circularity in healthcare. These include end-of-life management (Lansink, Reference Lansink2018), business model innovation (Han et al., Reference Han, Heshmati and Rashidghalam2020), circular product design (MacNeill et al., Reference MacNeill, Hopf, Khanuja, Alizamir, Bilec, Eckelman, Hernandez, McGain, Simonsen, Thiel, Young, Lagasse and Sherman2020), localization of food chains (Health Care Without Harm, 2016), sustainable supply chain practices (United Nations Development Programme, 2020), resource recovery (Stewart & Niero, Reference Stewart and Niero2018), education (Soares et al., Reference Soares, Buttigieg, Couto, Bak, McFadden, Hughes, McClure, Rodrigues and Bravo2023), and collaboration.

5. Conclusion

We argue that shifting to a revised quadruple aim for healthcare improvement, as warranted in the present paper, is quintessential to health systems at the current time. However, while advocacy from health systems may be powerful, the current planetary emergencies are best tackled through shared goals in other adaptive complex systems, such as society, economy, and politics. We assert that advancing planetary health should be at the core of policies that address societal and economic issues (Campbell-Lendrum et al., Reference Campbell-Lendrum, Neville, Schweizer and Neira2023). Framing this with a focus on mutual benefits between sectors may increase feasibility and amplify successes (European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2023; WHO, 2023).

Despite their inner contradictions, the sustainable development goals, along with an economy anchored to a degrowth and post-growth vision, aspiring to wellbeing and sustainable prosperity (Brand-Correa et al., Reference Brand-Correa, Brook, Büchs, Meier, Naik and O'Neill2022; D'Alessandro et al., Reference D'Alessandro, Cieplinski, Distefano and Dittmer2020; Wiedmann et al., Reference Wiedmann, Lenzen, Keyßer and Steinberger2020) – rather than to perpetually inflate gross domestic product – are desirable partners of a renewed health system. Recently, the Covid-19 pandemic reaction illustrated the viability of significant and quick changes that demand the participation of governments, private businesses, civil society, and households (Myers & Frumkin, Reference Myers and Frumkin2020; Ringsmuth et al., Reference Ringsmuth, Otto, van den Hurk, Lahn, Reyer, Carter, Magnuszewski, Monasterolo, Aerts, Benzie, Campiglio, Fronzek, Gaupp, Jarzabek, Klein, Knaepen, Mechler, Mysiak, Sillmann and West2022). Such coordination between systems, on a national and international level, with the shared goal of enhancing planetary health, may lay the foundation of an authentic planetary health system (Prasad, Reference Prasad2023).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Prof. Samuel S. Myers, Faculty Director of the Planetary Health Alliance and of the Johns Hopkins Institute for Planetary Health, for reviewing the paper and providing his valuable feedback.

Authors contributions

AP conceived and framed the initial idea, reviewed the literature, drafted and revised the paper, and generated figures. AA contributed to framing the initial idea, reviewed the literature, drafted and revised the paper, and generated figures. CC revised the paper and provided oversight of the project. AGdB and WR provided oversight of the project. All authors approved the final version.

Funding statement

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests

None to be declared.

References

Agache, I., Sampath, V., Aguilera, J., Akdis, C. A., Akdis, M., Barry, M., Bouagnon, A., Chinthrajah, S., Collins, W., Dulitzki, C., Erny, B., Gomez, J., Goshua, A., Jutel, M., Kizer, K. W., Kline, O., LaBeaud, A. D., Pali-Schöll, I., Perrett, K. P., … Nadeau, K. C. (2022). Climate change and global health: A call to more research and more action. Allergy, 77(5), 13891407. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alami, H., Lehoux, P., Miller, F. A., Shaw, S. E., & Fortin, J.-P. (2023). An urgent call for the environmental sustainability of health systems: A ‘sextuple aim’ to care for patients, costs, providers, population equity and the planet. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 38(2), 289295. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3616CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersen, M. P. S., Nielsen, O. J., & Sherman, J. D. (2023). Assessing the potential climate impact of anaesthetic gases. The Lancet Planetary Health, 7(7), e622e629. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00084-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, K., Schröder-Bäck, P., Clemens, T., Dyakova, M., Stielke, A., & Bellis, M. A. (2020). The social value of investing in public health across the life course: A systematic scoping review. BMC Public Health, 20(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08685-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atwoli, L., Baqui, A. H., Benfield, T., Bosurgi, R., Godlee, F., Hancocks, S., Horton, R., Laybourn-Langton, L., Monteiro, C. A., Norman, I., Patrick, K., Praities, N., Rikkert, M. G. M. O., Rubin, E. J., Sahni, P., Smith, R., Talley, N. J., Turale, S., & Vázquez, D. (2021). Call for emergency action to limit global temperature increases, restore biodiversity, and protect health. BMJ, 374, n1734. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1734CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aymerich, C., Pedruzo, B., Pérez, J. L., Laborda, M., Herrero, J., Blanco, J., Mancebo, G., Andrés, L., Estévez, O., Fernandez, M., Salazar de Pablo, G., Catalan, A., & González-Torres, (2022). COVID-19 pandemic effects on health worker's mental health: Systematic review and meta-analysis. European Psychiatry: The Journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 65(1), e10. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandosz, P., Ahmadi-Abhari, S., Guzman-Castillo, M., Pearson-Stuttard, J., Collins, B., Whittaker, H., Shipley, M. J., Capewell, S., Brunner, E. J., & O'Flaherty, M. (2020). Potential impact of diabetes prevention on mortality and future burden of dementia and disability: A modelling study. Diabetologia, 63(1), 104115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-019-05015-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berwick, D. M., Nolan, T. W., & Whittington, J. (2008). The triple aim: Care, health, and cost. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 27(3), 759769. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhopal, A., & Norheim, O. F. (2021). Priority setting and net zero healthcare: How much health can a tonne of carbon buy? BMJ, 375, e067199. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-067199CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bi, P., & Hansen, A. (2018). Carbon emissions and public health: An inverse association? The Lancet Planetary Health, 2(1), e8e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30177-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, I. M., Eissa, M., Mattijsen, J. C., Sana, H., Haines, A., & Whitmee, S. (2024). Effectiveness of greenhouse gas mitigation intervention for health-care systems: A systematic review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 102(3), 159175B. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.23.290464CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bodenheimer, T., & Sinsky, C. (2014). From triple to quadruple aim: Care of the patient requires care of the provider. Annals of Family Medicine, 12(6), 573576. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1713CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brand-Correa, L., Brook, A., Büchs, M., Meier, P., Naik, Y., & O'Neill, D. W. (2022). Economics for people and planet – moving beyond the neoclassical paradigm. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(4), e371e379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00063-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell-Lendrum, D., Neville, T., Schweizer, C., & Neira, M. (2023). Climate change and health: Three grand challenges. Nature Medicine, 29(7), 16311638. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02438-wCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centre for Sustainable Healthcare. (2020). SPACE TO BREATH – Valuing green space at NHS sites for staff wellbeing (p. 114). https://nhsforest.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Space-to-Breathe-Full-Report-.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cook, N., Goodwin, D., Porter, J., & Collins, J. (2023). Food and food-related waste management strategies in hospital food services: A systematic review. Nutrition & Dietetics: The Journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia, 80(2), 116142. https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12768CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Alessandro, S., Cieplinski, A., Distefano, T., & Dittmer, K. (2020). Feasible alternatives to green growth. Nature Sustainability, 3(4), 329335. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0484-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deivanayagam, T. A., English, S., Hickel, J., Bonifacio, J., Guinto, R. R., Hill, K. X., Huq, M., Issa, R., Mulindwa, H., Nagginda, H. P., de Sato, P. M., Selvarajah, S., Sharma, C., & Devakumar, D. (2023). Envisioning environmental equity: Climate change, health, and racial justice. The Lancet, 402(10395), 6478. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00919-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, C., Lennox, L., & Bell, D. (2013). A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open, 3(1), e001570. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckelman, M. J., Huang, K., Lagasse, R., Senay, E., Dubrow, R., & Sherman, J. D. (2020a). Health care pollution and public health damage in the United States: An update. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 39(12), 20712079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckelman, M., Romanello, M., Sherman, J., & Watts, N. (2020b). The health-care sector's role in climate stabilisation – authors’ reply. The Lancet, 396(10244), 9293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30802-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckelman, M. J., Sherman, J. D., & MacNeill, A. J. (2018). Life cycle environmental emissions and health damages from the Canadian healthcare system: An economic-environmental-epidemiological analysis. PLoS Medicine, 15(7), e1002623. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002623CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Hallal, M., Shah, Y., Nath, M., Eksambe, P., Theroux, L., Amlicke, M., Steele, F., Krief, W., & Kothare, S. (2021). Length of stay linked to neurodiagnostic workup for seizures presenting to the pediatric emergency department. Epilepsy & Behavior: E&B, 115, 107639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. (2023). Making Health for All Policies: Harnessing the co-benefits of health (p. 34). https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/publications/i/making-health-for-all-policies-harnessing-the-co-benefits-of-healthGoogle Scholar
Friel, S. (2022). Climate change, society, and health inequities. Medical Journal of Australia, 217(9), 466468. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2022/217/9/climate-change-society-and-health-inequitiesCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuller, R., Landrigan, P. J., Balakrishnan, K., Bathan, G., Bose-O'Reilly, S., Brauer, M., Caravanos, J., Chiles, T., Cohen, A., Corra, L., Cropper, M., Ferraro, G., Hanna, J., Hanrahan, D., Hu, H., Hunter, D., Janata, G., Kupka, R., Lanphear, B., … Yan, C. (2022). Pollution and health: A progress update. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(6), e535e547. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00090-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanis, P., Vraka, I., Fragkou, D., Bilali, A., & Kaitelidou, D. (2021). Nurses’ burnout and associated risk factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(8), 32863302. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14839CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, A., & Joshi, M. (2022). The value of less: Improving patient care by reducing unnecessary procedures. NEJM Catalyst, 3(11), CAT.22.0200. https://doi.org/10.1056/CAT.22.0200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerland, P., Hertog, S., Wheldon, M., Kantorova, V., Gu, D., Gonnella, G., Williams, I., Zeifman, L., Bay, G., Castanheira, H., Kamiya, Y., Bassarsky, L., Gaigbe-Togbe, V., & Spoorenberg, T. (2022). World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of results (p. 40). https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/wpp2022_summary_of_results.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gore, T. (2020). Confronting Carbon Inequality: Putting climate justice at the heart of the COVID-19 recovery (p. 56). https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/confronting-carbon-inequalityGoogle Scholar
Haines, A., & Ebi, K. (2019). The imperative for climate action to protect health. New England Journal of Medicine, 380(3), 263273. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1807873CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, J., Heshmati, A., & Rashidghalam, M. (2020). Circular economy business models with a focus on servitization. Sustainability, 12, 8799. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Health Care Without Harm. (2016). Food waste in European healthcare settings (p. 20). https://noharm-europe.org/documents/food-waste-european-healthcare-settingsGoogle Scholar
Health Care Without Harm. (2019). Health Care Without Harm Global Programs Annual Report – 2019 (p. 19). https://noharm-global.org/articles/news/global/health-care-without-harm-global-programs-annual-report-2019Google Scholar
Health Care Without Harm & Arup. (2019). Health care climate footprint report. https://global.noharm.org/resources/health-care-climate-footprint-reportGoogle Scholar
Hickel, J., O'Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., & Zoomkawala, H. (2022). National responsibility for ecological breakdown: A fair-shares assessment of resource use, 1970–2017. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(4), e342e349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00044-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard, C., MacNeill, A. J., Hughes, F., Alqodmani, L., Charlesworth, K., de Almeida, R., Harris, R., Jochum, B., Maibach, E., Maki, L., McGain, F., Miller, J., Nirmala, M., Pencheon, D., Robertson, S., Sherman, J. D., Vipond, J., Yin, H., & Montgomery, H. (2023). Learning to treat the climate emergency together: Social tipping interventions by the health community. The Lancet Planetary Health, 7(3), e251e264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00022-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK222274/Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Working Group II Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, G., Bakker, C. A., & Balkenende, R. (2017). Towards design strategies for circular medical products. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 3847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karliner, J., Roschnik, S., Boyd, R., Ashby, B., & Steele, K. (2021). Global road map for health care decarbonization. A navigational tool for achieving zero emissions with climate resilience and health equity (Climate-Smart Health Care Series). Health Care Without Harm. https://healthcareclimateaction.org/roadmapGoogle Scholar
Keil, M., Viere, T., Helms, K., & Rogowski, W. (2023). The impact of switching from single-use to reusable healthcare products: A transparency checklist and systematic review of life-cycle assessments. European Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 5663. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac174CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelendar, H., Faisal, M., & Mohammed, M. A. (2020). Lean processes mapping of diabetic patient flow in primary healthcare centres in Kuwait highlights opportunities for fewer patient visits. World Family Medicine Journal/Middle East Journal of Family Medicine, 18(6), 411. https://doi.org/10.5742/MEWFM.2020.93814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kherad, O., & Carneiro, A. V. (2022). Ten year anniversary of choosing wisely campaigns. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 103, 118119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2022.05.028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kickbusch, I., & Gleicher, D. (2012). Governance for health in the 21st century. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/326429Google Scholar
Kim, S.-K., Hwang, Y., Lee, Y., & Corser, W. (2015). Occupant comfort and satisfaction in green healthcare environments: A survey study focusing on healthcare staff. Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1), 156173. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v8n1p156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lansink, A. (2018). Challenging changes – connecting waste hierarchy and circular economy. Waste Management & Research, 36, 872872. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X18795600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, S., Clawson, J., & Howard, R. (2023). Value-based health care at an inflection point: A global agenda for the next decade. Catalyst Non-Issue Content, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1056/CAT.22.0332Google Scholar
Lenton, T. M., Xu, C., Abrams, J. F., Ghadiali, A., Loriani, S., Sakschewski, B., Zimm, C., Ebi, K. L., Dunn, R. R., Svenning, J.-C., & Scheffer, M. (2023). Quantifying the human cost of global warming. Nature Sustainability, 6(10), 12371247. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01132-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenzen, M., Malik, A., Li, M., Fry, J., Weisz, H., Pichler, P.-P., Chaves, L. S. M., Capon, A., & Pencheon, D. (2020). The environmental footprint of health care: A global assessment. The Lancet Planetary Health, 4(7), e271e279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30121-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacNeill, A. J., Hopf, H., Khanuja, A., Alizamir, S., Bilec, M., Eckelman, M. J., Hernandez, L., McGain, F., Simonsen, K., Thiel, C., Young, S., Lagasse, R., & Sherman, J. D. (2020). Transforming the medical device industry: Road map to a circular economy. Health Affairs, 39(12), 20882097. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01118CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacNeill, A. J., McGain, F., & Sherman, J. D. (2021). Planetary health care: A framework for sustainable health systems. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(2), e66e68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00005-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, A., Lenzen, M., McAlister, S., & McGain, F. (2018). The carbon footprint of Australian health care. The Lancet Planetary Health, 2(1), e27e35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30180-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marusic, M. (2023). BeWell – Skills Strategy for the digital & green upskilling and reskilling of the health and care workforce. https://euprimarycare.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/BeWell-Skills-Strategy.pdfGoogle Scholar
Masters, R., Anwar, E., Collins, B., Cookson, R., & Capewell, S. (2017). Return on investment of public health interventions: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 71(8), 827834. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2016-208141CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullough, J. M. (2018). The Return on Investment of Public Health System Spending (p. 5). https://academyhealth.org/sites/default/files/roi_public_health_spending_june2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
McDaid, D. (2018). Using economic evidence to help make the case for investing in health promotion and disease prevention (p. 32). https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/331981Google Scholar
McKay, D. I. A., Staal, A., Abrams, J. F., Winkelmann, R., Sakschewski, B., Loriani, S., Fetzer, I., Cornell, S. E., Rockström, J., & Lenton, T. M. (2022). Exceeding 1.5 °C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. Science (New York, N.Y.), 377(6611), eabn7950. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn7950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Missoni, E., & Galindo, E. M. (2020). Health workers and sustainable systems for health in a post-growth society. Visions for Sustainability, 2020(14), 8398. https://doi.org/10.13135/2384-8677/4545Google Scholar
Myers, S., & Frumkin, H. (2020). Planetary Health: Protecting Nature to Protect Ourselves. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-966-1Google Scholar
NHS England and NHS Improvement. (2022). Delivering a ‘Net Zero’ National Health Service. https://www.england.nhs.uk/greenernhs/publication/delivering-a-net-zero-national-health-service/Google Scholar
NHS. (n.d.). Greener NHS. Green transport delivers life-saving drugs and improves patient experience. Retrieved May 15, 2023, from https://www.england.nhs.uk/greenernhs/whats-already-happening/green-transport-delivers-life-saving-drugs-and-improves-patient-experience/Google Scholar
Nicolet, J., Mueller, Y., Paruta, P., Boucher, J., & Senn, N. (2022). What is the carbon footprint of primary care practices? A retrospective life-cycle analysis in Switzerland. Environmental Health, 21(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-021-00814-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nundy, S., Cooper, L. A., & Mate, K. S. (2022). The quintuple aim for health care improvement: A new imperative to advance health equity. JAMA, 327(6), 521522. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.25181CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Callaghan-Gordo, C., & Antó, J. M. (2020). COVID-19: The disease of the Anthropocene. Environmental Research, 187, 109683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109683CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Hara, A. C., Miller, A. C., Spinks, H., Seifert, A., Mills, T., & Tuininga, A. R. (2022). The sustainable prescription: Benefits of green roof implementation for urban hospitals. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4, 798012. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.798012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2023). Health expenditure and financing. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SHACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, K. B., Turner, K., Alishahi Tabriz, A., Gonzalez, B. D., Oswald, L. B., Nguyen, O. T., Hong, Y.-R., Jim, H. S. L., Nichols, A. C., Wang, X., Robinson, E., Naso, C., & Spiess, P. E. (2023). Estimated indirect cost savings of using telehealth among nonelderly patients with cancer. JAMA Network Open, 6(1), e2250211. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50211CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pereira, V. C., Silva, S. N., Carvalho, V. K. S., Zanghelini, F., & Barreto, J. O. M. (2022). Strategies for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in public health: An overview of systematic reviews. Health Research Policy and Systems, 20(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00815-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pernigotti, D., Stonham, C., Panigone, S., Sandri, F., Ferri, R., Unal, Y., & Roche, N. (2021). Reducing carbon footprint of inhalers: Analysis of climate and clinical implications of different scenarios in five European countries. BMJ Open Respiratory Research, 8(1), e001071. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001071CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pichler, P.-P., Jaccard, I. S., Weisz, U., & Weisz, H. (2019). International comparison of health care carbon footprints. Environmental Research Letters, 14(6), 064004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab19e1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinho-Gomes, A.-C., Yoo, S.-H., Allen, A., Maiden, H., Shah, K., & Toolan, M. (2022). Incorporating environmental and sustainability considerations into health technology assessment and clinical and public health guidelines: A scoping review. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 38(1), e84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462322003282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisters, P., Bien, B., Dankner, S., Rubinstein, E., & Sheriff, F. (2017). Supporting hospital renewal through strategic environmental sustainability programs. Healthcare Management Forum, 30(2), 7983. https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470416674481CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Planetary Health Alliance. (n.d.). Planetary Health Alliance – Planetary Health. Retrieved June 16, 2023, from https://www.planetaryhealthalliance.org/planetary-healthGoogle Scholar
Prasad, A. (2023). Renzo Guinto: Creating resilient planetary systems for health. The Lancet, 401(10384), 1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00734-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purohit, A., Smith, J., & Hibble, A. (2021). Does telemedicine reduce the carbon footprint of healthcare? A systematic review. Future Healthcare Journal, 8(1), e85e91. https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2020-0080CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasella, D., Harhay, M. O., Pamponet, M. L., Aquino, R., & Barreto, M. L. (2014). Impact of primary health care on mortality from heart and cerebrovascular diseases in Brazil: A nationwide analysis of longitudinal data. BMJ, 349, g4014. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redvers, N., Wright, K., Hartmann-Boyce, J., & Tonkin-Crine, S. (2023). Physicians’ views of patient–planetary health co-benefit prescribing: A mixed methods systematic review. The Lancet Planetary Health, 7(5), e407e417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00050-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ringsmuth, A. K., Otto, I. M., van den Hurk, B., Lahn, G., Reyer, C. P. O., Carter, T. R., Magnuszewski, P., Monasterolo, I., Aerts, J. C. J. H., Benzie, M., Campiglio, E., Fronzek, S., Gaupp, F., Jarzabek, L., Klein, R. J. T., Knaepen, H., Mechler, R., Mysiak, J., Sillmann, J., … West, C. (2022). Lessons from COVID-19 for managing transboundary climate risks and building resilience. Climate Risk Management, 35, 100395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2022.100395CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizan, C., Das, P., Low, R., Harden, S., Groves, N., Flaherty, B., Welland, T., & Bhutta, M. F. (2019). A streamlined pathway for patients with unilateral tinnitus: Our experience of 22 patients. Clinical Otolaryngology: Official Journal of ENT-UK; Official Journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery, 44(2), 191196. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13258CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rockström, J., Gupta, J., Qin, D., Lade, S. J., Abrams, J. F., Andersen, L. S., Armstrong McKay, D. I., Bai, X., Bala, G., Bunn, S. E., Ciobanu, D., DeClerck, F., Ebi, K., Gifford, L., Gordon, C., Hasan, S., Kanie, N., Lenton, T. M., Loriani, S., … Zhang, X. (2023). Safe and just Earth system boundaries. Nature, 619(7968), 102111. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rockström, J., Gupta, J., Qin, D., Pedde, S., Broadgate, W., & Warszawski, L. (2021). Stockholm to Stockholm: Achieving a safe Earth requires goals that incorporate a just approach. One Earth, 4(9), 12091211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.08.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocque, R. J., Beaudoin, C., Ndjaboue, R., Cameron, L., Poirier-Bergeron, L., Poulin-Rheault, R.-A., Fallon, C., Tricco, A. C., & Witteman, H. O. (2021). Health effects of climate change: An overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Open, 11(6), e046333. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046333CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romanello, M., Napoli, C. D., Drummond, P., Green, C., Kennard, H., Lampard, P., Scamman, D., Arnell, N., Ayeb-Karlsson, S., Ford, L. B., Belesova, K., Bowen, K., Cai, W., Callaghan, M., Campbell-Lendrum, D., Chambers, J., van Daalen, K. R., Dalin, C., Dasandi, N., … Costello, A. (2022). The 2022 report of the Lancet countdown on health and climate change: Health at the mercy of fossil fuels. The Lancet, 400(10363), 16191654. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01540-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, J., Crosbie, M., & Stewart, A. (2021). A qualitative literature review exploring the drivers influencing antibiotic over-prescribing by GPs in primary care and recommendations to reduce unnecessary prescribing. Perspectives in Public Health, 141(1), 1927. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913919879183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadatsafavi, H., Walewski, J., & Taborn, M. II (2015). Patient experience with hospital care – comparison of a sample of green hospitals and non-green hospitals. Journal of Green Building, 10, 169185. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.10.1.169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala, M., Alcamo, G., & Nelli, L. C. (2017). Energy-saving solutions for five hospitals in Europe. In A. Sayigh (Ed.), Mediterranean green buildings & renewable energy (pp. 117). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30746-6_1Google Scholar
Smith, M. R., Mueller, N. D., Springmann, M., Sulser, T. B., Garibaldi, L. A., Gerber, J., Wiebe, K., & Myers, S. S. (2022). Pollinator deficits, food consumption, and consequences for human health: A modeling study. Environmental Health Perspectives, 130(12), 127003. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soares, A. L., Buttigieg, S. C., Couto, J. G., Bak, B., McFadden, S., Hughes, C., McClure, P., Rodrigues, J., & Bravo, I. (2023). An evaluation of knowledge of circular economy among therapeutic radiographers/radiation therapists (TR/RTTs): Results of a European survey to inform curriculum design. Radiography (London, England: 1995), 29(2), 274283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2022.12.006Google ScholarPubMed
Sohal, A., & Vass, T. (2022). Australian SME's experience in transitioning to circular economy. Journal of Business Research, 142, 594604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltani, S., Saraf-Bank, S., Basirat, R., Salehi-Abargouei, A., Mohammadifard, N., Sadeghi, M., Khosravi, A., Fadhil, I., Puska, P., & Sarrafzadegan, N. (2021). Community-based cardiovascular disease prevention programmes and cardiovascular risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health, 200, 5970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.09.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somner, J., Stone, N., Koukkoulli, A., Scott, K., Field, A. R., & Zygmunt, J. (2008). Surgical scrubbing: Can we clean up our carbon footprints by washing our hands? The Journal of Hospital Infection, 70, 212215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2008.06.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanford, V., Barna, S., Gupta, D., & Mortimer, F. (2023). Teaching skills for sustainable health care. The Lancet Planetary Health, 7(1), e64e67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00330-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steenmeijer, M. A., Rodrigues, J. F. D., Zijp, M. C., & der Loop, S. L. W. (2022). The environmental impact of the Dutch health-care sector beyond climate change: An input–output analysis. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(12), e949e957. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00244-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, R., & Niero, M. (2018). Circular economy in corporate sustainability strategies: A review of corporate sustainability reports in the fast-moving consumer goods sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 10051022. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storz, M. A. (2020). Should plant-based hospital meals be the law? An American experience. Hospital Practice (1995), 48(5), 241243. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2020.1807756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, G. A., Petit, H. J., Reiter, A. J., Westrick, J. C., Hu, A., Dunn, J. B., Gulack, B. C., Shah, A. N., Dsida, R., & Raval, M. V. (2023). Environmental impact and cost savings of operating room quality improvement initiatives: A scoping review. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 236(2), 411423. https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000000478CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tennison, I., Roschnik, S., Ashby, B., Boyd, R., Hamilton, I., Oreszczyn, T., Owen, A., Romanello, M., Ruyssevelt, P., Sherman, J. D., Smith, A. Z. P., Steele, K., Watts, N., & Eckelman, M. J. (2021). Health care's response to climate change: A carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(2), e84e92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30271-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toolan, M., Walpole, S., Shah, K., Kenny, J., Jónsson, P., Crabb, N., & Greaves, F. (2023). Environmental impact assessment in health technology assessment: Principles, approaches, and challenges. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 39(1), e13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462323000041CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tseung, V., Verweel, L., Harvey, M., Pauley, T., & Walker, J. (2022). Hospital outdoor spaces: User experience and implications for design. HERD, 15(1), 256267. https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867211045403CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Nations Development Programme. (2020). Guidelines for Sustainable Procurement of Healthcare Commodities and Services. https://www.undp.org/publications/guidelines-sustainable-procurement-healthcare-commodities-and-servicesGoogle Scholar
Vicedo-Cabrera, A. M., Scovronick, N., Sera, F., Royé, D., Schneider, R., Tobias, A., Astrom, C., Guo, Y., Honda, Y., Hondula, D. M., Abrutzky, R., Tong, S., de Sousa Zanotti Stagliorio Coelho, M., Saldiva, P. H. N., Lavigne, E., Correa, P. M., Ortega, N. V., Kan, H., Osorio, S., … Gasparrini, A. (2021). The burden of heat-related mortality attributable to recent human-induced climate change. Nature Climate Change, 11(6), 492500. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01058-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y., Hu, B., Zhao, Y., Kuang, G., Zhao, Y., Liu, Q., & Zhu, X. (2021). Applications of system dynamics models in chronic disease prevention: A systematic review. Preventing Chronic Disease, 18, E103. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd18.210175CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weerasuriya, R., Henderson-Wilson, C., & Townsend, M. (2018). A systematic review of access to green spaces in healthcare facilities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 40, 125132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.06.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyant, C., Brandeau, M. L., Burke, M., Lobell, D. B., Bendavid, E., & Basu, S. (2018). Anticipated burden and mitigation of carbon-dioxide-induced nutritional deficiencies and related diseases: A simulation modeling study. PLoS Medicine, 15(7), e1002586. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmee, S., Green, R., Belesova, K., Hassan, S., Cuevas, S., Murage, P., Picetti, R., Clercq-Roques, R., Murray, K., Falconer, J., Anton, B., Reynolds, T., Waddington, H. S., Hughes, R. C., Spadaro, J., Jaber, A. A., Saheb, Y., Campbell-Lendrum, D., Cortés-Puch, M., … Haines, A. (2024). Pathways to a healthy net-zero future: Report of the Lancet Pathfinder Commission. The Lancet, 403(10421), 67110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02466-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitmee, S., Haines, A., Beyrer, C., Boltz, F., Capon, A. G., de Souza Dias, B. F., Ezeh, A., Frumkin, H., Gong, P., Head, P., Horton, R., Mace, G. M., Marten, R., Myers, S. S., Nishtar, S., Osofsky, S. A., Pattanayak, S. K., Pongsiri, M. J., Romanelli, C., … Yach, D. (2015). Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: Report of the Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission on planetary health. Lancet (London, England), 386(10007), 19732028. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60901-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO. (2015). Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/189951Google Scholar
WHO. (2020). Healthy cities. Effective approach to a rapidly changing world (p. 15). World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240004832Google Scholar
WHO. (2021). WHO global air quality guidelines. Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide (p. 290). World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240034228Google Scholar
WHO. (2022a). 21st century health challenges: Can the essential public health functions make a difference?: discussion paper (p. 44). World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240038929Google Scholar
WHO. (2022b, October 1). Essential public health functions. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/essential-public-health-functionsGoogle Scholar
WHO. (2023). Health for All: Transforming economies to deliver what matters (p. 88). https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/health-for-all--transforming-economies-to-deliver-what-mattersGoogle Scholar
Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L. T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Scientists’ warning on affluence. Nature Communications, 11(1), 3107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16941-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, Z., Shuai, X., Lin, Z., Yu, X., Ba, X., Holmes, M. A., Xiao, Y., Gu, B., & Chen, H. (2023). Association between particulate matter (PM)2.5 air pollution and clinical antibiotic resistance: A global analysis. The Lancet Planetary Health, 7(8), e649e659. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00135-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. A revised quadruple aim for healthcare improvement, centered on the advancement of planetary health.

Figure 1

Figure 2. How advancing planetary health contributes to other healthcare improvement aims.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Main principles and pathways to advancing planetary health as the leading aim for quality improvement in healthcare systems.