INTRODUCTION
It is widely known that strength of ice varies in a complicated manner depending on several factors: ice structure, density, porosity, salinity, strain rate, size effect, notch effect, temperature effect etc. Strength characteristics of first year sea ice have been studied by Tabata (1964, 1966, 1977), Saeki (1978), and Nakajima (1979). However, there seem to be no studies of first year sea ice concerning (1) the relationship between compressive strength and temperature in a size range, (2) effects of cross-sectional area of a test specimen on compressive strength, (3) probability distribution of compressive strength, (4) size effect on fracture toughness KIC, (5) dependence of the load direction on fracture toughness, and (6) dependence of environmental condition (air or water) and testing method on fracture toughness.
These characteristics are very important for estimating ice forces acting on off-shore structures in ice-covered seas, and are the subject of this paper.
TEST PROCEDURES
Sea ice is usually composed of layers, identified from the top down as snow ice, granular ice, and columnar ice (Weeks 1967). Test specimens were made from columnar ice of first year sea ice, sampled from Saroma Lagoon. Cylindrical specimens 7.5 cm in diameter and 7.5 cm long (size 1) were used for tests concerning temperature characteristics and probability distribution of compressive strength. Before tests at temperatures of -40 ºC to -10ºC, the specimens were chilled in a mixture of dry ice and alcohol. Larger specimens for testing size effects were cut in the shape of rectangular solids 15 cm x 15 cm x 40 cm (size 2) or 30 cm x 30 cm x 80 cm (size 3). Compressive strain rate was 10-3/sec.
Three-point bend specimens (3PB) and four-point bend specimens (4PB) were used, as illustrated in Figure 1, to examine fracture toughness. Their dimensions are shown in Table 1. Their K-value was calculated according to the formula specified in ASTM-E-399-78.
TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Compressive strength vs temperature
Figure 2 shows the relationship between temperature and compressive strength (sc) (refer to (B) and (C)). Saeki℉s finding (Saeki and others 1978) on sea ice sampled from Saroma Lagoon (A) and the data reviewed by Haynes (1979) ((D) through Butkovich (1955), Wolfe and Thieme (1964) and Dykins (1966) (H)) are also plotted in Figure 2. As demonstrated by Saeki℉s data (A), sea ice sampled from Saroma Lagoon shows a steep slope (sc/temperature is about 8 kg/(cm2. ºC)) in the range of -10º to 0ºC, but the slope is reduced to about 1 kg/(cm2 ºC) as demonstrated by our data, if the temperature is in the range of -40º to 0ºC. The temperature-dependent compressive fracture modes are classified as follows:
At temperatures of -20 ºC to 0ºC, crush is dominant. The slope is steep.
At temperatures of -40 ºC to -20ºC, brittle fracture is dominant. The slope is less steep. Typical relationships between compressive stress and strain are shown in Figure 3. These modal changes may have affected the slope.
From Figure 2, it is found that the compressive strength of columnar ice varies depending on the relative angle between the crystal growth direction and load direction. Compressive strength is about twice as great when the test specimen is loaded in the direction of crystal growth (B-Vertical: vertical test specimen) as when it is loaded normal to the crystal growth direction (C-Horizontal: horizontal test specimen). This phenomenon was explained by Tabata (1977) as follows. In a columnar crystal grain, the principal axis (C-direction) is normal to the longitudinal direction of the grain, that is, within a horizontal plane. The slip plane of the crystal thus lies within a perpendicular plane; when the ice sheet is compressed vertically, its slip plane is always parallel to the compressive force, and is least susceptible to it. On the other hand, the sample taken in the horizontal direction has crystal grains each of which shows various angles of slip planes against the compressive force, and is highly susceptible to slip.
Probability distribution of compressive strength
Figure 4 shows an example of frequency distribution of compressive strength in the temperature range of -4ºC to -1ºC, where crush mode is dominant. It was found that the scatter of compressive strength can be approximated by a normal distribution curve. The scatter of compressive strength is probably due to differences in the quantity and distribution of brine and pores in the sea ice, which cause hair cracks in the ice.
Size effect on compressive strength
Figure 5 shows the effect of size on compressive strength. In Figure 5, the ordinate represents non-dimensional compressive strength as relative values to the compressive strength (sco) of a size I test specimen of cross-sectional area 44 cm2. Butiagin (1966) and Butkovich℉s (1955) findings on freshwater ice, quoted in Tabata℉s report (1977), are also plotted in figure 5 A tendency can be seen that the larger the cross-sectional area of a test specimen, the lower the compressive strength becomes. It is inferred that the number of hair cracks increases with increase in the cross-sectional area of the specimen, which thus becomes more susceptible to fracture.
Fracture toughness KIC
The bending strength sbdetermined on three-point bending test specimens was in the range of about 4 to 8 kg/cm2 with temperatures was from -6ºC to -2 C. The KIC values determined on notched bending test specimens are given in Table 1. The KIC values of sea ice measured by Urabe and others (1979) are also listed. In general, these values are below 10 kg/cm2 , though they change slightly depending on the dimensions of the test specimens, the relative angle between crystal growth direction and load direction, environmental conditions (air or water), and testing method. Using K = qb=a, the critical crack length (2a) can be estimated as about 1 to 4 cm. It is interesting to note that this is close to the length of brine channel along the horizontal cross section.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
In its natural form, sea ice exists close to its melting point. Unlike iron and other metals, the determination of mechanical properties of sea ice involves various delicate problems. Testing should therefore be carried out with all possible care and in a manner to obtain practical data directly applicable to the design of offshore structures for ice-covered seas. To our regret, however, the current level of experimental and theoretical studies concerning sea ice physics is far short of this need. Although the introduction of fracture mechanics is an attractive attempt in this field, it should be noted that its careful handling will be needed because little is known about the strength characteristics of sea ice itself, particularly of the fracture mechanisms governing the strength of sea ice.