Data on birth weight and growth of kittens are important for factorial calculation of requirements. In addition, they are very helpful for health monitoring of kittens. So far, there have been numerous data on colony cats (non-pedigreed European shorthair cats(Reference Strasser1–Reference Edtstadtler-Pietsch4)) but to our knowledge, there is very little information on pure-bred cats, only covering the breeds Abyssinian, Exotic Shorthair and British Shorthair Cats(Reference Strasser1, Reference Salomon, Flügge and Hartmann5). These studies have indicated similar allometric effects in cats as in dogs(Reference Sierths-Roth6, Reference Meyer, Dammers and Kienzle7), i.e. a smaller relative birth weight in larger breeds. The larger British Shorthair Cats took longer to reach their mature weight than the smaller Exotic Shorthair Cats(Reference Salomon, Flügge and Hartmann5), which is another similarity to the allometry of growth in dogs. Therefore, in the present study, data from breeders' weight protocols were evaluated to fill some of the gaps in our knowledge on birth weight and growth of pure-bred kittens.
Materials and methods
In the present study, data on body weight of pure-bred kittens (Maine Coon, Norwegian Forest Cat, Birman, Persian, Siamese/Oriental Shorthair Cat) from birth to 12 weeks of age were obtained from breeders (Table 1). In the context of another study on mature weight of pure-bred cats(Reference Kienzle and Moik8), breeders were contacted at cat shows in order to weigh and score adult pure-bred cats. Some kittens happened to be on these shows and were weighed. Several breeders then offered their records on kitten growth. For these records, kittens had been weighed on the breeders' own scales. Some breeders had weighed their kittens for many weeks, others only for a few days after birth. For retrospective evaluation of these data, mean values and standard deviations were calculated. The differences between two means were compared by student's t test, and more than two means by one-way ANOVA and Holm–Sidak test using Sigmastat™ 3.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago). Relative birth weight and relative litter weight are expressed as a percentage of normal body weight of female cats of the same breed as determined in another study(Reference Kienzle and Moik8) (see Table 1).
Table 1 Birth weight and weight development of kittens
(Mean values, standard deviations, number of kittens)
a,b,c,d Mean values with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).
* Mean values were significantly different between males and females (P < 0·05).
† Maine Coon 5·0 kg, Norwegian Forest Cat 3·9 kg, Birman 3·5 kg, Siamese 2·9 kg, Persian 3·1 kg(Reference Kienzle and Moik8).
Results
Absolute birth weight (in g) was higher in larger breeds than in smaller breeds, whereas relative birth weight (in percentage of mature queens) tended to be higher in smaller breeds (Table 1). Relative litter weight was highest in Norwegian Forest Cats (14·6 (sd 1·8) %; n 10) and lowest in Birmans (8·8 (sd 3·1) %, n 7; P < 0·05); the other breeds were in-between (11·9 (sd 2·0) %; n 19). Absolute growth was faster in larger breeds than in smaller breeds; however, in relation to expected mature weight, there was no clear-cut effect of breed size for the first 12 weeks of life. Norwegian Forest Cats and Maine Coons showed a significant sexual dimorphism at 84 d. The Birman males weighed at 28 d were heavier than the females of the same age. The Birman kittens weighed at 84 d, however, did not show sexual dimorphism, neither did the Siamese and Persian kittens of both age groups.
Discussion
As data collection was done in retrospect when breeders offered their growth protocols in the context of another study, obviously, the distribution of data is not systematic. Many breeders use weight control in newborn and suckling kittens as a diagnostic tool to detect potential problems in the kittens or dam. They often stop weighing them at a later age. Therefore, there were more data on newborn kittens than on older kittens in the breeders' weight protocols. Also, kittens were sold and thus the numbers decrease with age. Some older kittens happened to be present at cat shows and were weighed there. This explains numbers of kittens increasing with age in some cases. It means that data are in part longitudinal and in part cross-sectional. It is therefore possible that some effects of sex or breed may have been overlaid by breeder effects, especially in those breeds where numbers increase with age. The scales used by the breeders were not standardised. Therefore, increased errors are possible. Systematic errors, however, such as that the weight of all kittens is either over- or underestimated are unlikely. They might occur in breeds where only a small number of kittens from one or two breeders were weighed. It is also possible that stillborn kittens or kittens dying shortly after birth are omitted from these protocols. It is likely that the majority of such kittens are runts. The net result would be an overestimate of mean birth weight and an underestimate of litter weight. Nevertheless, the data do give an idea of the birth weight of viable pure-bred kittens.
The relative birth weight of the pure-bred kittens followed the same allometry as the birth weight of puppies, i.e. smaller relative birth weight for larger breeds(Reference Sierths-Roth6, Reference Meyer, Dammers and Kienzle7). By contrast, litter weight did not change with breed size. As in dogs, litter size increased with breed size. Interestingly, the relative birth weight of privately owned pure-bred kittens was lower in the present investigation and also in another study (weight of mature females and relative birth weight in Exotic Shorthair Cats 3·2 kg and 2·9 % and in British Shorthair Cats 3·9 kg and 3·1 %(Reference Strasser1)) than the birth weight described for non-pedigreed colony cats (approximately 3·5 kg and 3·3 %(Reference Strasser1–Reference Edtstadtler-Pietsch4)) or for Abyssinian colony cats (weight of mature females 2·9 kg; relative birth weight 4·4 %(Reference Strasser1)), regardless of breed size. With the exception of Birmans, the litter weight was the same in pure-bred cats as in colony cats. A lower relative birth weight and the same relative litter weight can only be explained by an increased number of kittens per litter in privately owned pure-bred cats. These findings make it appear unlikely that the data presented are seriously compromised by the possibility of omitted runts. It is unclear whether this is a management or a breed effect. Compared with domestic cats, wild cats have a higher relative birth weight (3·7 %(Reference Meyer-Holzapfel9, Reference Condé and Schauenberg10)) compared with female mature weight (3·6 kg).
During postnatal growth of kittens, a lower birth weight was rapidly compensated. In relation to mature weight, the data on pure-bred kittens do not systematically deviate from those of colony cats(Reference Loveridge2, Reference Edtstadtler-Pietsch4). At present, it is not possible to either exclude or confirm an allometric effect in growing kittens such as a faster relative growth of smaller breeds. At the age of 12 weeks in females, who mature earlier than males(Reference Edtstadtler-Pietsch4), such a tendency could be postulated from the present study (i.e. significantly higher percentage of expected mature weight reached in smaller breeds), but not in males.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all breeders who cooperated in the study. There is no conflict of interest. The study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. K. M. obtained the data and statistically evaluated the data. E. K., in part, statistically evaluated the data and wrote the manuscript.
