Ackers, L. ‘Citizenship, gender and dependency in the EU: Women and internal migration’ in Hervey, K. H. and O’Keeffe, D. (eds), Sex Equality Law in the European Union (Wiley 1996).Google Scholar

Ackers, L. Shifting Spaces: Women, Citizenship and Migration within the European Union (Policy Press 1998).Google Scholar

Ackers, L., and Stalford, H., ‘Children, migration and citizenship in the European Union: Intra-community mobility and the status of children in EC law’ (1999) 21 Children and Youth Services Review 987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adam, S., and Van Elsuwege, P., ‘EU citizenship and the European federal challenge through the prism of family reunification’ in Kochenov, D. (ed), EU Citizenship and Federalism – The Role of Rights (Cambridge University Press 2017).Google Scholar

Almond, B. The Fragmenting Family (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Antokolskaia, M. ‘Convergence and divergence of divorce laws in Europe’ (2006) 18 Child and Family Law Quarterly 307.Google Scholar

Antokolskaia, M. Harmonisation of Family Law in Europe: A Historical Perspective (Intersentia 2006).Google Scholar

Antokolskaia, M. ‘The search for a common core of divorce law: State intervention v. spouses’ autonomy’ in Martín-Casals, M. and Ribot, J. (eds), The Role of Self-Determination in the Modernisation of Family Law in Europe (Documenta Universitaria 2006).Google Scholar

Antokolskaia, M. ‘Harmonisation of substantive family law in Europe: Myths and reality’ (2010) 22 Child and Family Law Quarterly 397.Google Scholar

Antokolskaia, M. ‘Divorce in a European perspective’ in Scherpe, J. M. (ed), European Family Law Vol. III – Family Law in a European Perspective (Edward Elgar Publishing 2016).Google Scholar

Archard, D. The Family: A Liberal Defence (Palgrave Macmillan 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archard, D. ‘Family and family law: Concepts and norms’ in Brake, E. and Ferguson, L. (eds), Philosophical Foundations of Children’s and Family Law (Oxford University Press 2018).Google Scholar

Azoulai, L. ‘Transfiguring European citizenship: From Member State Territory to Union Territory, in EU citizenship and federalism: The role of rights’ in Kochenov, D. (ed), EU Citizenship and Federalism (Cambridge University Press 2015).Google Scholar

Azoulai, L. ‘The European individual and collective entities’ in Azoulai, L., Barbou des Places, S., and Pataut, E. (eds), Constructing the Person in EU Law: Rights, Roles, Identities (Hart Publishing 2016).Google Scholar

Bailey, A., and Boyle, P., ‘Untying and retying family migration in the New Europe’ (2004) 30 Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balogh, L., László Pap, A., and Pásztor, E., ‘Hungary: The concept of family within the framework of “illiberal democracy”’ in Yassari, N. and Foblets, M.-C. (eds), Normativity and Diversity in Family Law (Springer 2022).Google Scholar

Banda, F., and Eekelaar, J., ‘International conceptions of the family’ (2017) 66 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbou des Places, S. ‘The integrated person in EU law’ in Azoulai, L., Barbou des Places, S., and Pataut, E. (eds), Constructing the Person in EU Law: Rights, Roles, Identities (Hart Publishing 2016).Google Scholar

Barbou des Places, S. ‘La famille du ressortissant d’État tiers: une famille désinstituée?’ in Fulchiron, H. (ed), La famille du migrant (Lexis Nexis 2020).Google Scholar

Barnard, C. S. The Substantive Law of the EU (Oxford University Press 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, G. ‘Family matters: European Community law and third country national family members’ (2003) 40 Common Market Law Review 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Başak, Ç., and Helfer, L., ‘The gender of treaty withdrawal: Lessons from the Istanbul Convention’ (EJIL: Talk!, 28 November 2022) <www.ejiltalk.org/the-gender-of-treaty-withdrawal-lessons-from-the-istanbul-convention/>..>Google Scholar

Beaumont, P. ‘Private international law concerning children in the UK after Brexit: Comparing Hague Treaty Law with EU Regulations’ (2017) 29 Child and Family Law Quarterly 214.Google Scholar

Beck-Gernsheim, E. Reinventing the Family: In Search of New Lifestyles (Polity Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Beqiraj, J., and Ippolito, F., ‘Conceptualizing an ‘association citizenship’ for children of Turkish workers’ in Thym, D. and Zoetewij-Turhan, M. H. (eds), Rights of Third-Country Nationals under EU Association Agreements (Brill 2015).Google Scholar

Bernardes, J. Family Studies: An Introduction (Routledge 1997).Google Scholar

Berneri, C. Family Reunification in the EU (Hart Publishing 2017).Google Scholar

Berneri, C. ‘Family reunification between static EU citizens and third country nationals’ (2018) 20 European Journal of Migration and Law 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boekestein, T. ‘Making do with what we have: On the interpretation and enforcement of the EU’s founding values’ (2022) 23 German Law Journal 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boele-Woelki, K. ‘Cross-border family relations in Europe: Towards a common European matrimonial property law based upon cooperation between private international law and substantive law’ in Keirse, A. L. M. and Loos, M. B. M. (eds), Alternative Ways to Ius Commune – The Europeanisation of Private Law (Intersentia 2012).Google Scholar

Boele-Woelki, K., and Fuchs, A. (eds), Same-Sex Relationships and Beyond (Intersentia 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonelli, M. ‘Infringement Actions 2.0: How to protect EU values before the Court of Justice’ (2022) 18 European Constitutional Law Review 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonelli, M., and Claes, M.. ‘Crossing the Rubicon? The Commission’s use of Article 2 TEU in the infringement action on LGBTIQ+ rights in Hungary' (2023) 30 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bottomley, A., and Wong, S., ‘Shared household: A new paradigm for thinking about the reform of domestic property relations’ in Diduck, A. and O’Donovan, K. (eds), Feminist Perspectives on Family Law (Routledge 2006).Google Scholar

Bracken, L. ‘Recognition of LGBTQI+ parent families across European borders’ (2022) 29 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, D. ‘Family law’ in Smits, J. M. (ed), Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2006).Google Scholar

Bribosia, E., and Rorive, I., ‘L’arrêt Coman: Quand la Cour de justice contribue à la reconnaissance du mariage homosexuel’ (2018) n 253 Journal de droit européen 344–347.Google Scholar

Brighouse, H., and Swift, A., Family Values: The Ethics of a Parent–Child Relationship (Princeton University Press 2014).Google Scholar

Brown, A. What Is the Family of Law? The Influence of the Nuclear Family (Hart 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burke, C., and Hannesson, Ó. Í., ‘Citizenship by the backdoor? Gunnarsson’ (2015) 52 Common Market Law Review 1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burke, E. Reflections on the Revolution in France (first published 1790) (Penguin 1968).Google Scholar

Caiola, A. ‘Une acception large de la notion de “conjoint” pour garantir la liberté de séjour des citoyens européens’ (2018) Revue des affaires européennes 335.Google Scholar

Camus, A. Resistance, Rebellion and Death (Wintage 1974).Google Scholar

Cannoot, P. ‘Inadmissibility decision in Bonnaud and Lecoq v. France: Should the Court have recognized the specificity of a same-sex relationship?’ (Strasbourg Observers, 11 April 2018) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2018/04/11/inadmissibility-decision-in-bonnaud-and-lecoq-v-france-should-the-court-have-recognized-the-specificity-of-a-same-sex-relationship/>..>Google Scholar

Caracciolo di Torella, E., and Masselot, A., ‘Under construction: EU family law’ (2004) 29 European Law Review 32.Google Scholar

Caracciolo di Torella, E., and Foubert, P., ‘Maternity rights for intended mothers? Surrogacy puts the EU legal framework to the test’ (2014) 2 European Gender Equality Law Review 5.Google Scholar

Caracciolo di Torella, E., and Masselot, A., Caring Responsibilities in European Law and Policy (Routledge 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlier, J.-Y. ‘Vers un ordre public européen des droits fondamentaux – L’exemple de la reconnaissance des mariages de personnes de même sexe dans l’arrêt Coman’ (2019) Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carrera, S. In Search of the Perfect Citizen? (Martinus Nijhoff 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carrera, S., and Wiesbrock, A., ‘Civic integration of third-country nationals: Nationalism versus Europeanisation in the Common EU Immigration Policy’, CEPS 2009.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, H., and Chinkin, C., ‘The gender of jus cogens’ (1993) 15 Human Rights Law Review 63.Google Scholar

Cheal, D. Sociology of Family Life (Blackwell 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chieregato, E. ‘A work-life balance for all? Assessing the inclusiveness of EU Directive 2019/1158’ (2020) 36 International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choudhry, S. ‘Right to respect for private and family life (family life aspects)’, in Peers, S., Hervey, T., and Ward, A. (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Hart Publishing 2014).Google Scholar

Coltrane, S. Gender and Families (Rowman & Littlefield 1998).Google Scholar

Corrias, L., and Tinnevelt, R. (eds), European Ways of Life: Legal and Philosophical Perspectives (Edward Elgar Publishing, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Costello, C. ‘Article 33 family and professional life’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., and Ward, A. (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Hart Publishing 2014).Google Scholar

Craig, P., and de Búrca, G., EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials (UK Version) (Oxford University Press 2020).Google Scholar

Cretney, S. Family Law in the Twentieth Century: A History (Oxford University Press 2004).Google Scholar

Cretney, S. Same Sex Relationships from ‘Odious Crime’ to ‘Gay Marriage’ (Oxford University Press 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Czapanskiy, K. ‘Volunteers and draftees: The struggle for parental equality’ (1991) 38 UCLA Law Review 1415.Google Scholar

Dąbrowska-Kłosińska, P. ‘The right to family reunion vs integration conditions for third-country nationals’ (2018) 20 European Journal of Migration and Law 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dailey, A. ‘Federalism and families’ (1995) 143 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, J., and Hanley, S., ‘What’s wrong with East-Central Europe? The fading mirage of the “Liberal Consensus”’ (2016) 27 Journal of Democracy 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, M., and Muir, E., ‘Hungary and the indirect protection of EU fundamental rights and the rule of law’ (2013) 14 German Law Journal 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Baere, G., and Gutman, K., ‘The impact of the European Union and the European Court of Justice on European Family Law’ in Scherpe, J. M. (ed), European Family Law Vol. I – The Impact of Institutions and Organisations on European Family Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2016).Google Scholar

De Capitani, C. ‘Rainbow families and the right to freedom of movement – the V.М.А. v Stolichna Obshtina, Rayon ‘Pancharevo’ Case’ (EU Law Analysis, 11 January 2022) <http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2022/01/rainbow-families-and-right-to-freedom.html>..>Google Scholar

de Witte, B. ‘The past and future of the European Court of Justice in the protection of human rights’ in Alston, P. (ed), The EU and Human Rights (Oxford University Press 1999).Google Scholar

Derave, C., and Ouhnaoui, H., ‘C.E. & al. v. France: Legal recognition of intended parenthood from previous same-sex relationships (between women)’ (Strasbourg Observers, 7 October 2022) <http://strasbourgobservers.com/2022/10/07/c-e-al-v-france-legal-recognition-of-intended-parenthood-from-previous-same-sex-relationships-between-women/>..>Google Scholar

Dermott, E., and Fowler, T. M., ‘What is a family and why does it matter’ (2020) 9 Social Sciences 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diduck, A. Law’s Families (Cambridge University Press 2003).Google Scholar

Diduck, A. ‘Shifting familiarity’ (2005) 58 Current Legal Problems 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diduck, A., and Kaganas, F., Family Law, Gender and the State (Hart Publishing 2012).Google Scholar

Dopffel, H. P. and Scherpe, J. M. ‘Gleichgeschlechtliche Lebensgemeinschaften im Recht der nordischen Länder’ in Basedow, J., Hopt, K. J., Kötz, H., and Dopffel, H. P. (eds), Die Rechtsstellung gleichgeschlechtlicher Lebensgemeinschaften (Mohr Siebeck 2000).Google Scholar

Dougan, M. ‘So long, farewell, aufwiedersehen, goodbye: The UK’s withdrawal package’ (2020) 57 Common Market Law Review 631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, G. ‘The intention to be a parent and the making of mothers’ (1994) 57 Modern Law Review 636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dubout, E. ‘The European form of family life. The case of EU citizenship’ (2020) 5 European Papers 3.Google Scholar

Dutta, A., and others (eds), Scheidung ohne Gericht? (Gieseking 2017).Google Scholar

Editorial Comments, ‘Safeguarding EU values in the Member States – Is something finally happening?’ (2015) 52 Common Market Law Review 625.Google Scholar

Editorial Comments, ‘Who are the “peoples of Europe”?’ (2023) 60 Common Market Law Review 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, R., McCarthy, J., and Gillies, V., ‘The politics of concepts: Family and its (putative) replacements’ (2012) 63 British Journal of Sociology 730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eeckhout, P. ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the federal question’ (2002) 39 Common Market Law Review 945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ergas, Y., Jenson, J., and Michel, S., ‘Introduction’ in Ergas, Y., Jenson, J., and Michel, S. (eds), Reassembling Motherhood: Procreation and Care in a Globalised World (Columbia University Press 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eskridge, W. N. Jr. Equality Practice: Civil Unions and the Future of Gay Rights (Routledge 2002).Google Scholar

Espejo-Yaksic, N., Fenton-Glynn, C., and Scherpe, J.M. (eds), Surrogacy in Latin America (Intersentia 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fabbrini, F. Fundamental Rights in Europe: Challenges and Transformations in Comparative Perspectives (Oxford University Press 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fallon, M. ‘Observations sous CJUE, 5 juin 2018, Gr. Ch., Coman, C-673/16, EU:C:2018:385’ (Cahiers de l’EDEM, June 2018) <http://uclouvain.be/fr/instituts-recherche/juri/cedie/actualites/observations-sous-cjue-5-juin-2018-gr-ch-coman-c-673-16-eu-c-2018-385.html>..>Google Scholar

Featherstone, B., Gupta, A., Morris, K., and Warner, J., ‘Let us stop feeding the risk monster: Towards a social model of “child protection”’ (2018) 7 Families, Relationships and Societies 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Featherstone, B. Children and the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2021).Google Scholar

Ferri, D., and Martinico, G., ‘Revisiting the Ruiz Zambrano Doctrine and exploring the potential for its extensive application’ (2021) 27 European Public Law 685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finch, J. ‘Displaying families’ (2007) 41 Sociology 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finck, M., and Kas, B., ‘Surrogacy leave as a matter of EU law: CD and Z’ (2015) 52 Common Market Law Review 281.Google Scholar

Forder, C. ‘Legal protection under Article 8 ECHR: Marckx and beyond’ (1990) 37 Netherlands International Law Review 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fredman, S. ‘Reversing roles: Bringing fathers into the frame’ (2014) 10 International Journal of Law in Context 442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frick, M. L. ‘Illiberalims and human rights’ in Sajó, A., Uitz, R., and Holmes, S. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism (Routledge 2021).Google Scholar

Fulchiron, H. ‘Un modèle familial européen?’ in Fulchiron, H. and Bidaut-Garon, C. (eds), Vers un statut européen de la famille (Dalloz 2014).Google Scholar

Fulchiron, H. ‘Citoyenneté européenne, liberté de circulation et reconnaissance des situations familiales créées dans un État membre: Un petit pas pour de grandes enjambées?’ (2018) Recueil Dalloz 1678.Google Scholar

Fulchiron, H. ‘La CEDH et la reconnaissance des mariages entre personnes de même sexe célébrés à l’étranger: Avis de tempête ou signal brouillé?’ (2018) Recueil Dalloz 446.Google Scholar

Fussey, P., and Rawlinson, P., Child Trafficking in the EU: Policing and Protecting Europe’s Most Vulnerable (Routledge 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ganty, S. ‘Silence is not (always) golden: A criticism of the ECJ’s approach towards integration conditions for family reunification’ (2021) 23 European Journal of Migration and Law 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ganty, S. ‘Surrogacy as Citizenship Deprivation in S.-H. v. Poland’ (Strasbourg Observers, 14 March 2022) <http://strasbourgobservers.com/2022/03/14/surrogacy-deprives-from-citizenship-in-s-h-v-poland%EF%BF%BC/#:~:text= − %20H.,of%20the%20Polish%20legal%20system>..>Google Scholar

Gheaus, A. ‘Is the family uniquely valuable?’ (2012) 6 Ethics and Social Welfare 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilding, M. ‘Reflexivity over and above convention: The new orthodoxy in the sociology of personal life, formerly sociology of the family’ (2010) 61 British Journal of Sociology 757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gittins, D. The Family in Question (Macmillan 1985).Google Scholar

González Pascual, M., and Torres Pérez, A. (eds), The Right to Family Life in the European Union (Routledge 2018).Google Scholar

Goudappel, F. The Effects of EU Citizenship (T.M.C. Asser Press 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graff, A., and Korolczuk, E., ‘Gender and Illiberal Politics’ in M. Laruelle (ed), Oxford Handbook of Illiberalism (Oxford University Press 2023).Google Scholar

Groussot, X., and Gill-Pedro, E., ‘Old and new human rights in Europe – The scope of EU rights versus that of ECHR rights’ in Brems, E. and Gerards, J. (eds), Shaping the Rights in ECHR – The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press 2013).Google Scholar

Groussot, X., and Petursson, G. T., ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights five years on – The emergence of a new constitutional framework’ in de Vries, S., Bernitz, U., and Weatherill, S. (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Binding Instrument – Five Years Old and Growing (Hart Publishing 2015).Google Scholar

Grzebalska, W. ‘Poland’ in Kováts, E. and Põim, M. (eds), Gender as Symbolic Glue: The Position and Role of Conservative and Far Right Parties in the Anti-gender Mobilizations in Europe (FEPS – Foundation for European Progressive Studies 2015).Google Scholar

Grzebalska, W., and Pető, A., ‘The gendered modus operandi of the illiberal transformation in Hungary and Poland’ (2018) 68 Women’s Studies International Forum 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guild, E., Gortázar Rotaeche, C. J., and Kostakopoulou, D. (eds), The Reconceptualization of European Union Citizenship (Brill Nijhoff 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guild, E., Peers, S., and Tomkin, J., The EU Citizenship Directive: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guth, J. ‘When is a partner not a partner? Conceptualisations of “family” in EU Free Movement Law’ (2011) 33 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutman, K. ‘The essence of the fundamental right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union: The best is yet to come?’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halmai, G. ‘The early retirement age of the Hungarian judges’ in Nicola, F. and Davis, B. (eds), EU Law Stories: Contextual and Critical Histories of European Jurisprudence (Cambridge University Press 2017).Google Scholar

Hammje, P. ‘Obligation de reconnaissance d’un mariage entre personnes de même sexe conclu dans un État membre aux fins d’octroi d’un droit de séjour dérivé’ (2018) Revue critique de droit international privé 816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hantrais, L. ‘What is a family or family life in the European Union?’ in Guild, E. (ed), The Legal Framework and Social Consequences of Free Movement of Persons in the European Union (Kluwer 1999).Google Scholar

Harding, M. ‘The harmonisation of private international law in Europe: Taking the character out of family law?’ (2011) 7 Journal of Private International Law 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. ‘Positivism and the separation of law and morals’ (1958) 71 Harvard Law Review 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayward, A. ‘Same-sex registered partnerships – A right to be recognized’ (2016) 75 Cambridge Law Journal 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herring, J., Probert, R., and Gilmore, S., Great Debates in Family Law (Macmillan 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herring, J. Family Law (Pearson 2017).Google Scholar

Hervey, T. H. ‘A gendered perspective on the right to family life in European Community law’ in Neuwahl, N. and Rosas, A. (eds), The European Union and Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff 1995).Google Scholar

Hesová, Z. ‘Three types of culture wars and the populist strategies in Central Europe’ (2021) 28 Czech Journal of Political Science/Politologick 130.Google Scholar

Hodson, L. ‘Ties that bind: Towards a child-centred approach to lesbian, gay, bi-sexual and transgender families under the ECHR’ (2012) 20 International Journal of Children’s Rights 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, S. ‘The antiliberal idea’ in Sajó, A., Uitz, R., and Holmes, S. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism (Routledge 2021).Google Scholar

Honorati, C., and Baruffi, M. C., EU Private International Law in Family Matters: Legislation and CJEU Case Law (Intersentia 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyltén-Cavallius, K. ‘Who cares? Caregivers’ derived residence rights from children in EU free movement law’ (2020) 57 Common Market Law Review 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iglesias Sanchez, S. ‘Fundamental rights and citizenship of the Union at a crossroads: A promising alliance or a dangerous liaison?’ (2014) European Law Journal 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irwin, S. ‘Resourcing the family: Gendered claims and obligations and issues of explanation’ in Silva, E. B. and Smart, C. (eds), The New Family? (Sage 1999).Google Scholar

Jackson, E. ‘What is a parent?’ in Diduck, A. and O’Donovan, K. (eds), Feminist Perspectives on Family Law (Routledge 2006).Google Scholar

Jacobs, F. G. (ed), European Law and the Individual (North Holland 1976).Google Scholar

Jakab, A., and Kochenov, D., ‘Introductory remarks’ in Jakab, A. and Kochenov, D. (eds), The Enforcement of EU Law and Values: Ensuring Member States’ Compliance (Oxford University Press 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaganas, F., and Day Sclater, S., ‘Contact disputes: Narrative constructions of “good” parents’ (2004) 12 Feminist Legal Studies 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaiser, L. ‘A new chapter in the European rule of law saga?’ (VerfBlog, 4 March 2023) <https://verfassungsblog.de/a-new-chapter-in-the-european-rule-of-law-saga/>..>Google Scholar

Kemper, A. ‘Foundation of the nation: How political parties and movements are radicalising others in favour of conservative family values and against tolerance, diversity, and progressive gender politics in Europe’ (Friedrich Ebert Stiftung 2016) <http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/dialog/12503.pdf>..>Google Scholar

Kiernan, K. ‘Changing European families: Trends and issues’ in Scott, J., Treas, J., and Richards, M. (eds), The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Families (Blackwell 2004).Google Scholar

Kilpatrick, C. ‘The Court of Justice and Labour Law in 2010: A new EU discrimination law architecture’ (2011) 40 Industrial Law Journal 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knowles, E. Oxford Dictionary of Quotations (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Kochenov, D. ‘Gay rights in the EU: A long way forward for the Union of 27’ (2007) 3 Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kochenov, D. ‘Mevrouw de Jong Gaat Eten: EU citizenship and the culture of prejudice’ EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2011/06 <https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/15774>..>Google Scholar

Kochenov, D. (ed), EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights (Cambridge University Press 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kochenov, D., and Belavusau, U., ‘After the celebration: Marriage equality in EU Law post-Coman in eight questions and some further thoughts’ (2020) 27 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kochenov, D., and Belavusau, U., ‘Same-sex spouses: More free movement, but what about marriage? Coman’ (2020) 57 Common Market Law Review 227.Google Scholar

Kochenov, D., and van den Brink, M., ‘Pretending there is no union: Non-derivative Quasi-citizenship rights of third-country nationals in the EU’ in Thym, D. and Zoetewij-Turhan, M. H. (eds), Rights of Third-Country Nationals under EU Association Agreements (Brill 2015).Google Scholar

Koffeman, N. Morally Sensitive Issues and Cross-Border Movement in the EU: The Cases of Reproductive Matters and Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships (Intersentia 2015).Google Scholar

Koffeman, N. ‘Taddeucci and McCall v. Italy: Welcome novelty in the ECtHR’s case-law on equal treatment of same-sex couples’ (Strasbourg Observers, 27 July 2016) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2016/07/27/taddeucci-and-mccall-v-italy-welcome-novelty-in-the-ecthrs-case-law-on-equal-treatment-of-same-sex-couples/>..>Google Scholar

Korolczuk, E. ‘“The war on gender” from a transnational perspective: Lessons for feminist strategising’ in Anti‐gender Movements on the Rise? Strategising for Gender Equality in Central and Eastern Europe (Heinrich Böll Stiftung 2014) <https://pl.boell.org/sites/default/files/uploads/2014/10/war_on_gender_korolczuk.pdf>.Google Scholar

Korolczuk, E., and Graff, A., ‘“Worse than Communism and Nazism put together”: War on gender in Poland’ in Kuhar, R. and Paternotte, D. (eds), Anti-gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against Equality (Rowman & Littlefield 2017).Google Scholar

Korolczuk, E., and Graff, A., ‘Gender as “Ebola from Brussels”: The anticolonial frame and the rise of illiberal populism’ (2018) 43 Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koslowski, R., ‘A constructive approach to understanding the European Union as a federal polity’ (1999) 4 Journal of European Public Policy 561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krizsan, A., and Roggeband, C., ‘Towards a conceptual framework for struggles over democracy in backsliding states: Gender equality policy in Central Eastern Europe’ (2018) 6 Politics and Governance 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruger, T., and Samyn, L., ‘Brussels IIbis: Successes and suggested improvements’ (2016) 12 Journal of Private International Law 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuby, G. The Global Sexual Revolution: Destruction of Freedom in the Name of Freedom (Angelico Press 2015).Google Scholar

Kuhar, R., and Paternotte, D., Anti-gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against Equality (Rowman & Littlefield 2017).Google Scholar

Kuskoff, E., and others, ‘Of good mothers and violent fathers: Negotiating child protection interventions in abusive relationships’ (2023) Violence Against Women (online first).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lacroix, J. ‘Does Europe need common values?’ (2009) 8 European Journal of Political Theory 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambinet, F., and Gilson, S., ‘Arrêt “Hay”: Les partenaires (de même sexe) pacsés doivent-ils être traités comme des (hétérosexuels) Mariés’ 2014 Journal de droit européen 243.Google Scholar

Lamont, R. ‘Care proceedings with a European dimension under Brussels IIa: jurisdiction, mutual trust and the best interests of the child’ (2016) 28 Child and Family Law Quarterly 67.Google Scholar

Lamont, R. ‘Not a European family: Implications of Brexit for international family law’ (2017) 29 Child and Family Law Quartely 267.Google Scholar

Lamont, R. ‘The development of child protection across international borders for children at risk of harm’ in Douglas, G., Murch, M., and Stephens, V. (eds), International and National Perspectives on Child and Family Law (Intersentia 2018).Google Scholar

Lamont, R. ‘Article 24’ in Peers, S. and others (eds), The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (Hart Publishing 2021).Google Scholar

Lamont, R. ‘Child protection in international family law and the determination of where the child “belongs” for the purpose of jurisdiction’ (2022) 34 Child and Family Law Quarterly 401.Google Scholar

Lamont, R., and Fenton-Glynn, C., ‘Cross-border care and adoption proceedings in the European Union’ (2016) 38 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lane Scheppele, K. ‘Enforcing the basic principles of EU law through systemic infringement actions’ in Closa, C. and Kochenov, D. (eds), Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in The European Union (Cambridge University Press 2021).Google Scholar

Lane Scheppele, K., Kochenov, D., and Grabowska-Moroz, B., ‘EU values are law, after All: Enforcing EU values through systemic infringement actions by the European Commission and the Member States of the European Union’ (2020) 39 Yearbook of European Law 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lane Scheppele, K., and Morijn, J., ‘Frozen, how the EU is blocking funds to Hungary and Poland using a multitude of conditionalities’ (VerfBlog, 4 April 2023) <https://verfassungsblog.de/frozen/>..>Google Scholar

Laruelle, M. ‘Illiberalism: A conceptual introduction’ (2022) 38 East European Politics 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Łazowski, A. ‘When Cives Europae became bargaining chips: Free movement of persons in the Brexit negotiations’ (2018) 18 ERA Forum 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lebret, A. ‘The European Court of Human Rights and the framing of reproductive rights’ (2020) Droits Fondamentaux <www.crdh.fr/revue/n-18–2020/the-european-court-of-human-rights-and-the-framing-of-reproductive-rights/>..>Google Scholar

Leeder, E. The Family in Global Perspective: A Gendered Journey (Sage 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leib, E. J. ‘Friendship and the law’ (2007) 54 UCLA Law Review 631.Google Scholar

Lenaerts, K. ‘Exploring the limits of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2012) 8 European Constitutional Law Review 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lendvai-Bainton, N., and Szelewa, D., ‘Governing new authoritarianism: Populism, nationalism and radical welfare reforms in Hungary and Poland’ (2021) 55 Social Policy & Administration 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, M. ‘Surrogacy and parenthood: A European saga of genetic essentialism and gender discrimination’ (2022) 29 Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lievens, J. ‘EHRM opent deur naar europese erkenning homohuwelijk’ (2018) Juristenkrant 1.Google Scholar

Linnamäki, K. ‘Not in front of the child: Illiberal familism and the Hungarian anti‐LGBTQ+ “Child Protective Law”’ (2022) 10 Politics and Governance 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lombardo, E., Kantola, J., and Rubio‐Marin, R., ‘De‐democratization and opposition to gender equality politics in Europe’ (2021) 28 Social Politics 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loxa, A. ‘Analysis: “Cross-border recognition of parenthood for rainbow families”’ (EU Law Live, 14 December 2021) <https://eulawlive.com/analysis-cross-border-recognition-of-parenthood-for-rainbow-families-by-alezini-loxa/>..>Google Scholar

Lugosi, N. V. T. ‘Radical right framing of social policy in Hungary: Between nationalism and populism’ (2018) 34 Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lund-Andersen, I. ‘Registered partnerships in Denmark’ in Scherpe, J. M. and Hayward, A. (eds), The Future of Registered Partnerships – Family Recognition beyond Marriage? (Intersentia 2017).Google Scholar

Mahmoud, Z. ‘Surrogates across the Atlantic: Comparing the impact of legal and health regulatory frameworks on surrogates’ autonomy, health and wellbeing’ (PhD thesis, University of Exeter 2022).Google Scholar

Mahmoud, Z., and Romanis, E. C., ‘On gestation and motherhood’ (2023) 31 Medical Law Review 109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mancini, S., and Palazzo, N., ‘The body of the nation: Illiberalism and gender’ in Sajó, A., Uitz, R., and Holmes, S. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism (Routledge 2021).Google Scholar

Margaria, A., ‘Parenthood and cross-border surrogacy: What is “new”? The ECtHR’s First Advisory Opinion’ (2020) 28 Medical Law Review 412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Margaria, A., ‘Trans men giving birth and reflections on fatherhood: What to expect?’ (2020) 34 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margaria, A., ‘Honner v France: Damage prevention and/or damage control?’ (Strasbourg Observers, 12 January 2021) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2021/01/12/honner-v-france-damage-prevention-and-or-damage-control/>..>Google Scholar

Margaria, A., ‘Genetics and the construction of parenthood: The ECtHR jurisprudence on transnational surrogacy’ in Dethloff, N. and Kaesling, K. (eds), Between Sexuality, Gender and Reproduction – On the Pluralisation of Family Forms (Intersentia 2023).Google Scholar

Marguénaud, J.-P. ‘Le refus de la procréation médicalement assistée à un couple d’homosexuelles mariées ou la subsidiarité otage de la proportionnalité.’ (2018) Revue trimestrielle de droit civil 349.Google Scholar

Marshall, T. H. Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays (Cambridge University Press 1950).Google Scholar

Martens, P. ‘L’égalité dans l’adoption’ (2013) Revue de jurisprudence de Liège, Mons et Bruxelles 1404.Google Scholar

Martiny, D. ‘Divorce and maintenance between former spouses – Initial results of the Commission in European family law’ in Boele-Woelki, K. (ed), Perspectives for the Unification and Harmonisation of Family Law in Europe (Intersentia 2003).Google Scholar

Martiny, D. ‘Is unification of family law feasible or even desirable?’ in Hartkamp, A. S. and others (eds), Towards a European Civil Code (Kluwer 2011).Google Scholar

Marzano, V. J. ‘Oliari and the European Court of Human Rights: Where the court failed’ (2017) Pace International Law Review 241.Google Scholar

McCandless, J. ‘Reforming birth registration law in England and Wales?’ (2017) 4 Reproductive BioMedicine and Society Online 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McClintock, A. ‘Family feuds. Gender, nationalism and the family’ (1993) 44 Feminist Review 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McEleavy, P. ‘The Brussels II Regulation: How the European community has moved into family law’ (2002) 51 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McEleavy, P. ‘Private international law: Brussels IIbis matrimonial matters, parental responsibility, child abduction and mutual recognition’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGlynn, C. ‘A family law for the European Union?’ in Shaw, J. (ed), Social Law and Policy in an Evolving European Union (Hart Publishing 2000).Google Scholar

McGlynn, C. ‘Ideologies of motherhood in European community sex equality law’ (2000) 6 European Law Journal 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGlynn, C. ‘Families and the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights: Progressive change or entrenching the status quo’ (2001) 26 European Law Review 582.Google Scholar

McGlynn, C. ‘Reclaiming a feminist vision: The reconciliation of paid work and family life in European Union law and policy’ (2001) 7 Columbia Journal of European Law 262.Google Scholar

McGlynn, C. ‘The Europeanisation of family law’ (2001) 13 Child and Family Law Quarterly 35.Google Scholar

McGlynn, C. Families and the European Union: Law, Politics and Pluralism (Cambridge University Press 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meeusen, J. ‘Instrumentalisation of private international law in the European Union: Towards a European conflicts revolution?’ (2007) 9 European Journal of Migration and Law 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meeusen, J. ‘Functional recognition of same-sex parenthood for the benefit of mobile Union citizens – Brief comments on the CJEU’s Pancharevo judgment – GEDIP’ (GEDIP-EGPIL, 2022) <https://eapil.org/2022/02/03/functional-recognition-of-same-sex-parenthood-for-the-benefit-of-mobile-union-citizens-brief-comments-on-the-cjeus-pancharevo-judgment/>..>Google Scholar

Melhuus, M. ‘Better safe than sorry: Legislating assisted conception in Norway’ in Krohn-Hansen, C. and Nustad, K. (eds), State formation: Anthropological perspectives (Pluto 2005).Google Scholar

Menendez, A. ‘Which free movement? Whose free movement?’ in Borelli, S. and Guazzarotti, A. (eds), Labour Mobility and Transnational Solidarity in the European Union (Jovene editore 2019).Google Scholar

Merin, Y. Equality for Same-Sex Couples: The Legal Recognition of Gay Partnerships in Europe and the United States (Rowman & Littlefield 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mewes, J. and Mau, S., ‘Unraveling working-class welfare chauvinism’ in Svallfors, S. (ed), Contested Welfare States: Welfare Attitudes in Europe and Beyond (Stanford University Press 2012).Google Scholar

Michaels, R., and Riles, A., ‘Law as technique’ in Foblets, M.-C. and others, The Oxford Handbook of Law and Anthropology (Oxford University Press 2022).Google Scholar

Milanich, N. ‘Certain mothers, uncertain fathers – Placing assisted reproductive technologies in historical perspective’ in Ergas, Y., Jenson, J., and Michel, S. (eds), Reassembling Motherhood: Procreation and Care in a Globalised World (Columbia University Press 2017).Google Scholar

Milios, G. ‘Defining “family members” of EU citizens and the circumstances under which they can rely on EU law’ (2020) 39 Yearbook of European Law 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Millard, É. Famille et droit public. Recherches sur la construction d’un objet juridique, Tome 182 (LGDJ 1995).Google Scholar

Moebius, I., and Szyszczak, E., ‘Of raising pigs and children’ (1998) 18 Yearbook of European Law 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montale, M. Ossi Di Seppia (Piero Gobetti 1925).Google Scholar

Morgan, D. H. J. Family Connections (Polity Press 1996).Google Scholar

Moskal, M., and Tyrrell, N., ‘Family migration decision-making, step-migration and separation: Children’s experiences in European migrant worker families’ (2016) 14 Children’s Geographies 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller-Freienfels, W. ‘The unification of family law’ (1968) 16 The American Journal of Comparative Law 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murat, P. ‘Article II-69’ in Burgorgue-Larsen, L., Levade, A., and Picod, F. (eds), Traité établissant une Constitution pour l’Europe. Commentaire article par article. Partie II: La Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union (Bruylant 2005).Google Scholar

Mustasaari, S. ‘Introduction to Special Issue on transnational child protection’ (2022) 34 Child and Family Law Quarterly 333.Google Scholar

Mustasaari, S. ‘Children abroad: A relational analysis of cross-border child protection cases in the Finnish Central Authority’ (2022) 34 Child and Family Law Quarterly 361.Google Scholar

Naldini, M., and Long, J.. ‘Geographies of families in the European Union: A legal and social policy analysis’ (2017) 31 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nic Shuibhne, N. ‘The right to move and reside: Disentangling the dual dynamics of fundamental rights in EU citizenship law’ in Douglas-Scott, S. and Hatzis, N. (eds), Research Handbook on EU Law and Human Rights (Edward Elgar Publishing 2017).Google Scholar

O’Brien, C. ‘Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Vulnerable EU citizens cast adrift in the UK post-Brexit’ (2021) 58 Common Market Law Review 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Donovan, K. ‘Constructions of maternity and motherhood in stories of lost children’ in Bridgeman, J. and Monk, D. (eds), Feminist Perspectives on Child Law (Routledge 2000).Google Scholar

O’Leary, S. The Evolving Concept of Community Citizenship: From the Free Movement of Persons to Union Citizenship (Kluwer 1996).Google Scholar

Öberg, M.-L. ‘From EU citizens to third country nationals: The legacy of Polydor’ (2016) 22 European Public Law 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Öberg, M.-L. ‘Internal market acquis as a tool in EU external relations: From integration to disintegration’ (2020) 47 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ochiai, E. ‘Introduction: Reconstruction of intimate and public spheres in Asian modernity’ in Ochiai, E. and Aoi Hosoya, L. (eds), Transformation of the Intimate and the Public in Asian Modernity (Kyoto University Press 2013).Google Scholar

Palazzo, N. ‘The EU family: Is marital status emerging as a prohibited ground of discrimination?’ in Bernard, E., Cresp, M., and Ho-Dac, M. (eds), La famille dans l’ordre juridique de l’Union européenne / Family within the Legal Order of the European Union (Bruylant 2020).Google Scholar

Palazzo, N., and Tomasi, M., ‘I referendum in materia di diritti delle coppie omosessuali: Minoranze e vox populi’ (2016) 1 GenIUS 89.Google Scholar

Palonen, E. ‘Performing the nation: The Janus-faced populist foundations of illiberalism in Hungary’ (2018) 26 Journal of Contemporary European Studies 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palumbo, L. ‘The borders of legal motherhood: Rethinking access to assisted reproductive technologies in Europe’ in Ergas, Y., Jenson, J., and Michel, S. (eds), Reassembling Motherhood: Procreation and Care in a Globalised World (Columbia University Press 2017).Google Scholar

Parti, K. ‘Illiberal and populist political narratives on gender and underreporting of sexual violence: A case study of Hungary’ (2022) 10 Politics and Governance 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parton, N. ‘Child protection and safeguarding in England: Changing and competing conceptions of risk and their implications for social work’ (2011) 41 British Journal of Social Work 854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parton, N. ‘Comparing child protection systems’ in Dolan, P. and Frost, N. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Global Child Welfare (Routledge 2017).Google Scholar

Paskalia, V. Free Movement, Social Security and Gender in the EU (Hart Publishing 2007).Google Scholar

Pastre-Belda, B. ‘La Cour européenne des droits de l’homme, entre promotion de la subsidiarité et protection effective des droits’ (2013) Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’Homme 256.Google Scholar

Pataut, E. ‘La famille saisie par l’Union’ in Bernard, E., Cresp, M., and Ho-Dac, M. (eds), La famille dans l’ordre juridique de l’Union européenne / Family within the Legal Order of the European Union (Bruylant 2020).Google Scholar

Pech, L., and Kochenov, D., ‘Respect for the rule of law in the case law of the European Court of Justice: A casebook overview of key judgments since the Portuguese judges case’ SIEPS 2021:3 <www.sieps.se/globalassets/publikationer/2021/sieps-2021_3-eng-web.pdf?>..>Google Scholar

Pető, A. ‘Gender and illiberalism’ in Sajó, A., Uitz, R., and Holmes, S. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism (Routledge 2021).Google Scholar

Pető, A. ‘Three readings of one law: Reregulating sexuality in Hungary’ (LSE EUROPP blog, 8 July 2021) <https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2021/07/06/three-readings-of-one-law-reregulating-sexuality-in-hungary/>..>Google Scholar

Pintens, W. ‘Family law in Europe: Developments and perspectives’ (2008) 41 The Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 155.Google Scholar

Pintens, W., and Scherpe, J. M., ‘The Marckx case: A “whole code of family law”?’ in Gilmore, S., Herring, J., and Probert, R. (eds), Landmark Cases in Family Law (Hart Publishing 2011).Google Scholar

Pohjankoski, P. ‘Rule of law with leverage: Policing structural obligations in EU law with the infringement procedure, fines, and set-off’ (2021) 58 Common Market Law Review 1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popenoe, D. ‘American family in decline, 1960–1990: A review and appraisal’ (1993) 55 Journal of Marriage and the Family 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poppelwell-Scevak, C. ‘Oliari, Orlandi and homophobic dissenting opinions: The Strasbourg approach to the recognition of same sex marriages’ (Strasbourg Observers, 2 February 2018) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2018/02/02/oliari-orlandi-and-homophobic-dissenting-opinions-the-strasbourg-approach-to-the-recognition-of-same-sex-marriages/>..>Google Scholar

Prechal, S., and Widdershoven, R., ‘Redefining the relationship between “Rewe-effectiveness” and effective judicial protection’ (2011) 4 Review of European Administrative Law 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Puppinck, G. ‘X. and Others v. Austria (Part I): Had the woman been a man …’ (Strasbourg Observers, 4 March 2013) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2013/03/04/x-and-others-v-austria-part-i-had-the-woman-been-a-man/>..>Google Scholar

Ragone, S., and Volpe, V., ‘An emerging right to a “gay” family life? The case Oliari v. Italy in a comparative perspective’ (2016) 17 German Law Journal 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rathus, Z. ‘Social science or ‘Lego science’? Presumptions, politics, parenting and the new family law’ (2010) 10 QUT Law Review 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice (revised edition, Oxford University Press 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Réveillère, V. ‘Family rights for naturalized EU citizens: Lounes’ (2018) 55 Common Market Law Review 1855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rijpma, J. J. ‘You gotta let love move: ECJ 5 June 2018, Case C-673/16, Coman, Hamilton, Accept v. Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări’ (2019) 15 European Constitutional Law Review 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rijpma, J. J., and Koffeman, N., ‘Free movement rights for same-sex couples under EU law: What role to play for the CJEU?’ in Gallo, D., Paladini, L., and Pustorino, P. (eds), Same-Sex Couples before National, Supranational and International Jurisdictions (Springer 2014).Google Scholar

Rodean, N. ‘Adoption and same-sex couples: New rights in European constitutional space after the ruling X and Others v. Austria’ (2014) 29 Direitos Fundamentais & Justiça 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romeo Casabona, C. M., Paslack, R., and Simon, J. W., ‘Reproductive medicine and the law: Egg donation in Germany, Spain and other European countries’ (2013) 38 Revista de Derecho y Genoma Humano 15.Google Scholar

Sajó, A., Uitz, R., and Holmes, S. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism (Routledge 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salzberg, M. ‘The Marckx case’ (1983–1984) 13 Denver Journal for International Law and Policy 283.Google Scholar

Sata, R. ‘In the name of the family’ (Gunda Werner Institut - Heinrich Böll Stiftung 2022) <www.gwi-boell.de/en/2022/01/31/im-namen-der-familie-wie-populistinnen-ungarn-gegen-geschlechtergleichstellung>..>Google Scholar

Scheiwe, K. ‘EU law’s unequal treatment of the family: The case law of the European Court of Justice on rules prohibiting discrimination on grounds of sex and nationality’ (1994) 3 Social and Legal Studies 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scherpe, J. M. ‘Zehn Jahre registrierte Partnerschaft in Dänemark - Zur Novellierung des Gesetzes von 1989’ (2000) Deutsches und Europäisches FamilienRecht 32.Google Scholar

Scherpe, J. M. ‘Erfahrungen mit dem Rechtsinstitut der registrierten Lebenspartnerschaft in Dänemark’ (2001) Familie Partnerschaft Recht 439.Google Scholar

Scherpe, J. M. ‘Gleichgeschlechtliche Lebensgemeinschaften’ in Basedow, J., Hopt, K.-J., and Zimmermann, R. (eds), Handwörterbuch des Europäischen Privatrechts (Mohr Siebeck 2009).Google Scholar

Scherpe, J. M. ‘From ‘odious crime’ to family life – Same-sex couples and the ECHR’ in Verbeke, A. and others (eds), Confronting the Frontiers of Family and Succession Law – Liber amicorum Walter Pintens (Intersentia 2012).Google Scholar

Scherpe, J. M. ‘Same-sex relationships’ in Basedow, J., Hopt, K.-J., and Zimmermann, R. (eds), Max Planck Encyclopedia of European Private Law (Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar

Scherpe, J. M. ‘The legal recognition of same-sex couples in Europe and the role of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2013) 10 The Equal Rights Review 83.Google Scholar

Scherpe, J. M. (ed), The Legal Status of Transsexual and Transgender Persons (Intersentia 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scherpe, J. M. The Present and Future of European Family Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scherpe, J. M. ‘Breaking the existing paradigms of parent–child relationships’ in Douglas, G., Murch, M., and Stephens, V. (eds), International and National Perspectives on Child and Family Law: Essays in Honour of Nigel Lowe (Intersentia 2018).Google Scholar

Scherpe, J. M. ‘Is there a ‘European Family Law’?’ (2023) 54 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scherpe, J. M. ‘Marriage and the family’ in Corrias, L. and Tinnevelt, R. (eds), European Ways of Life: Legal and Philosophical Perspectives (Edward Elgar Publishing, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Scherpe, J. M., Fenton-Glynn, C., and Kaan, T. (eds), Eastern and Western Perspectives on Surrogacy (Intersentia 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scherpe, J. M., and Hayward, A. (eds), The Future of Registered Partnerships – Family Recognition beyond Marriage? (Intersentia 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, M., and Bogdanowicz, P., ‘The infringement procedure in the rule of law crisis: How to make effective use of Article 258 TFEU’ (2018) 55 Common Market Law Review 1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schönberger, C. ‘European citizenship as federal citizenship, some citizenship lessons of comparative federalism’ (2007) 19 European Review of Public Law 63.Google Scholar

Schütze, R. European Union Law (Cambridge University Press 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaw, J. The Transformation of Citizenship in the European Union (Cambridge University Press 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shenfield, F., and others, ‘Cross border reproductive care in six European countries’ (2010) 25 Human Reproduction 1367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smart, C. Personal Life: New Directions in Sociological Thinking (Polity 2007).Google Scholar

Smet, S. ‘X. and others v. Austria (Part II): A narrow ruling on a narrow issue’ (Strasbourg Observers, 6 March 2013) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2013/03/06/x-and-others-v-austria-part-ii-a-narrow-ruling-on-a-narrow-issue/>..>Google Scholar

Smyth, C. European Asylum Law and the Rights of the Child (Routledge 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snell, J. ‘Do fundamental rights determine the scope of EU law?’ (2018) 43 European Law Review 475.Google Scholar

Somek, A. ‘The individualisation of liberty: Europe’s move from emancipation to empowerment’ (2013) 4 Transnational Legal Theory 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Somek, A. ‘Alienation, despair and social freedom’ in Azoulai, L., Barbou des Places, S., and Pataut, E. (eds), Constructing the Person in EU Law: Rights, Roles, Identities (Hart Publishing 2016).Google Scholar

Spaventa, E. ‘Mice or horses? British citizens in the EU 27 after Brexit as “former EU citizens”’ (2019) 44 European Law Review 589.Google Scholar

Spieker, L. D. ‘Berlaymont is back: The Commission invokes Article 2 TEU as self-standing plea in infringement proceedings over Hungarian LGBTIQ rights violations’ (EU Law Live, 22 February 2023) <https://eulawlive.com/op-ed-berlaymont-is-back-the-commission-invokes-article-2-teu-as-self-standing-plea-in-infringement-proceedings-over-hungarian-lgbtiq-rights-violations-by-luke-dimitrios-spieker/>..>Google Scholar

Spratt, T., and others, ‘Child protection in Europe: Development of an international cross-comparison model to inform national policies and practices’ (2015) 45 British Journal of Social Work 1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stacey, J. Brave New Families: Stories of Domestic Upheaval in Late Twentieth Century America (Basic Books 1990).Google Scholar

Stalford, H. ‘Concepts of family under EU law – Lessons from the ECHR’ (2002) 16 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stalford, H. Children and the European Union: Rights, Welfare and Accountability (Hart Publishing 2012).Google Scholar

Stalford, H. ‘The UK referendum on membership of the EU: Whither social welfare and family law?’ (2016) 38 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stehlík, V. ‘The CJEU crossing the Rubicon on the same-sex marriages? Commentary on Coman case’ (2018) 18 International and Comparative Law Review 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevenson, C. ‘Persuasive definitions’ (1938) 47 Mind 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stöckl, K. ‘The European culture wars’ (ZOiS Spotlight 13/19, 3 April 2019) <https://en.zois-berlin.de/publications/zois-spotlight/archiv-2019/the-european-culture-wars>..>Google Scholar

Strumia, F. ‘The family in EU law after the SM ruling: Variable geometry and conditional deference’ (2019) 4 European Papers 389.Google Scholar

Sturm, F. ‘Das Straßburger Marckx-Urteil zum Recht des nichtehelichen Kindes und seine Folgen’ (1982) Zeitschrift für das gesamte Familienrecht 1151.Google Scholar

Swennen, F. ‘Motherhoods and the law’ in Willekens, H. and others (eds), Motherhood and the Law (Göttingen University Press 2019).Google Scholar

Szikra, D. ‘Democracy and welfare in hard times: The social policy of the Orbán Government in Hungary between 2010 and 2014’ (2014) 24 Journal of European Social Policy 486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Szikra, D., and Szelewa, D., ‘Do Central and Eastern European countries fit the “Western” picture? The example of family policies in Hungary and Poland’ in Klenner, C. and Leiber, S. (eds), Welfare States and Gender Inequality in Central and Eastern Europe: Continuity and Post‐socialist Transformation in the EU Member States (European Trade Union Institute 2010).Google Scholar

Takács, J., Fobear, K., and Schmitsek, S., ‘Resisting genderphobia in Hungary’ (2022) 10 Politics and Governance 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thienpont, D., and Willems, G., ‘Le droit à la libre circulation des familles homoparentales consacré par la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne’ (2022) 132 Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’Homme 925.Google Scholar

Thompson, L. ‘Impossible expectations? Abused mothers’ experiences of the child protection and family court systems’ (2020) 32 Child and Family Law Quarterly 31.Google Scholar

Thym, D., and Zoetewij-Turhan, M. H., ‘Introduction: Free movement between membership and partnership’ in Thym, D. and Zoetewij-Turhan, M. H. (eds.), Rights of Third-Country Nationals under EU Association Agreements (Brill 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Timmer, A. ‘S.H. and Others v Austria: Margin of appreciation and IVF’ (Strasbourg Observers, 9 November 2011) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2011/11/09/s-h-and-others-v-austria-margin-of-appreciation-and-ivf/>..>Google Scholar

Tobler, C. ‘Equality and non-discrimination under the ECHR and EU law: A comparison focusing on discrimination against LGBTI persons’ (2014) 74 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 521.Google Scholar

Tobler, C. ‘Free movement of persons in the EU v. in the EEA: Of effect-related homogeneity and a reversed Polydor principle’ (2018) 3 European Papers 1429.Google Scholar

Todorova, V. ‘Gender wars in Bulgaria’ in Scherpe, J. M. and Gilmore, S. (eds), Family Matters – Essays in Honour of John Eekelaar (Intersentia 2022).Google Scholar

Torres Pérez, A. Conflicts of Rights in the European Union – A Theory of Supranational Adjudication (Oxford University Press 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torres Pérez, A. ‘Rights and powers in the European Union: Towards a Charter that is fully applicable to the Member States’ (2020) 22 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tóth, O., and Dupcsik, C., ‘Trust in people and conservatism of family and gender roles in Hungary and in some other European countries’ (2011) 1 Journal of Intimate and Public Spheres 152.Google Scholar

Trimmings, K., Shakargy, S., and Achmad, C. (eds), Research Handbook on Surrogacy and the Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tryfonidou, A. ‘(Further) signs of a turn of the tide in the CJEU’s citizenship jurisprudence: Case C-40/11, Iida, Judgment of 8 November 2012’ (2013) 20 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 302.Google Scholar

Tryfonidou, A. ‘Another failed opportunity for the effective protection of LGB rights under EU law: Dr David. L. Parris v. Trinity College Dublin and Others’ (EU Law Analysis, 1 December 2016) <http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/12/another-failed-opportunity-for.html>..>Google Scholar

Tryfonidou, A. ‘EU free movement law and the children of rainbow families: Children of a lesser god?’ (2019) 38 Yearbook of European Law 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tryfonidou, A. ‘The ECJ recognises the right of same-sex spouses to move freely between EU Member States: The Coman ruling’ (2019) 44 European Law Review 663.Google Scholar

Tryfonidou, A. ‘Law and sexual minority rights in the EU: Navigating a political minefield’ in Cardwell, P. and Granger, M.-P. (eds), Research Handbook on the Politics of EU Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2020).Google Scholar

Tryfonidou, A. ‘Positive state obligations under European law: A tool for achieving substantive equality for sexual minorities in Europe’ (2020) 13 Erasmus Law Review 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tryfonidou, A. ‘The cross-border recognition of the parent–child relationship in rainbow families under EU law: A critical view of the ECJ’s V.M.A. Ruling’ (European Law Blog, 21 December 2021) <https://europeanlawblog.eu/2021/12/21/the-cross-border-recognition-of-the-parent-child-relationship-in-rainbow-families-under-eu-law-a-critical-view-of-the-ecjs-v-m-a-ruling/>.CrossRef.>Google Scholar

Tryfonidou, A. ‘The ECJ recognises the right of rainbow families to move freely between EU Member States: The V.M.A. ruling’ (2022) 47 European Law Review 534.Google Scholar

Tryfonidou, A. ‘The impact of right-wing populism on the family rights of sexual minorities in Europe’ (2022) EU-POP Working Paper Series 2.Google Scholar

Tryfonidou, A. ‘Cross-border recognition of parenthood in the EU: Comments on the Commission proposal of 7 December’ (2023) 24 ERA Forum 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tryfonidou, A. ‘Surrogacy in the ECHR and the European institutions’ in Trimmings, K., Shakargy, S., and Achmad, C. (eds), Research Handbook on Surrogacy and the Law (Edward Elgar Publishing forthcoming).Google Scholar

Vaige, L. Cross-Border Recognition of Formalized Same-Sex Relationships (Intersentia 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Eijken, H. EU Citizenship and the Constitutionalisation of the European Union (Europa Law Publishing 2015).Google Scholar

Van Hoof, W., and Pennings, G., ‘Extraterritorial laws for cross-border reproductive care: The issue of legal diversity’ (2012) 19 European Journal of Health Law 187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Van Hoof, W., and Pennings, G., ‘The consequences of S.H. and Others v Austria for legislation on gamete donation in Europe: an ethical analysis of the European Court of Human Rights judgments’ (2012) 25 Reproductive BioMedicine Online 667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Van Middelaar, L. The Passage to Europe: How a Continent Became a Union (Yale University Press 2014).Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, A., and Spieker, L. D., ‘Countering the judicial silencing of critics: Article 2 TEU values, reverse Solange, and the responsibilities of national judges’ (2019) 15 European Constitutional Law Review 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waaldijk, K. ‘The gender-neutrality of the International Right to Marry: Same-sex couples may still be excluded from marriage, but their exclusion – and their foreign marriages – must be recognised’ (23 July 2018) <https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3218308>..>Google Scholar

Waaldijk, K. ‘Small change: How the road to same-sex marriage got paved in the Netherlands’ in Wintemute, R. and Andenæs, M. (eds), Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Partnerships: A Study of National, European, and International Law (Hart Publishing 2001) 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walklate, S., and Mythen, G. ‘Beyond risk theory: Experiential knowledge and “knowing otherwise”’ (2011) 11 Criminology and Criminal Justice 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiler, J. ‘Editorial: Does the European Union truly need a Charter of Rights?’ (2000) 6 European Law Journal 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weston, S., and Mythen, G., ‘Disentangling practitioners’ understandings of child sexual exploitation: The risks of assuming otherwise?’ (2022) 22 Criminology and Criminal Justice 618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Willekens, H. ‘Motherhood as a legal institution: A historical-sociological introduction’ in Willekens, H. and others (eds), Motherhood and the Law (Göttingen University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Willems, G. ‘Orientation sexuelle et adoption: L’Autriche condamnée par la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme’ (2013) Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme 1037.Google Scholar

Willems, G. ‘Droits de l’homme et procréation médicalement assistée: La Cour de Strasbourg face aux évolutions biomédicales et aux mutations de la filiation’ in Massager, N., Procréation médicalement assistée et gestation pour autrui: Regards croisés du droit et de la pratique médicale (Anthemis 2017).Google Scholar

Willems, G. ‘Le droit au regroupement familial des époux homosexuels consacré par la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne’ (2018) La semaine juridique (édition générale).Google Scholar

Williams, R. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society (Croom Helm 1976).Google Scholar

Wollenschläger, F. ‘A new fundamental freedom beyond market integration: Union citizenship and its dynamics for shifting the economic paradigm of European integration’ (2011) 17 European Law Journal 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woods, L. ‘Family rights in the EU – Disadvantaging the disadvantaged?’ (1999) 11 Child and Family Law Quarterly 17.Google Scholar

Wright, M. ‘Working the international child protection case: A snapshot of local authorities’ experiences within an evolving legal context’ (2019) 41 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yuval-Davis, N. ‘Gender and nation’ (1997) 16 Ethnic and Racial Studies 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimanyi, E. ‘Family b/Orders: Hungary’s campaign for the “Family Protection Action Plan”’ (2020) 20 Feminist Media Studies 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar