Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:06:36.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A novel approach for Mediterranean monk seal conservation: an artificial ledge in a marine cave

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2022

Ezgi Saydam*
Affiliation:
Mediterranean Conservation Society, Kazımdirik Mah. Ankara Cad. Yanyolu Folkart Time 1 Blok No: 812 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
Harun Güçlüsoy
Affiliation:
The Institute of Marine Sciences and Technology, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey
Zafer Alı Kızılkaya
Affiliation:
Mediterranean Conservation Society, Kazımdirik Mah. Ankara Cad. Yanyolu Folkart Time 1 Blok No: 812 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
*
(Corresponding author, [email protected])

Abstract

The Mediterranean monk seal Monachus monachus, categorized as Endangered on the IUCN Red List, comprises 600–700 individuals in the eastern Mediterranean Sea and eastern Atlantic Ocean. Habitat degradation is a severe threat to the species. In 2016 and 2017, coastline surveys were conducted in Gökova Bay, south-west Turkey, to identify suitable monk seal habitat. A significant factor hindering recovery of the monk seal population of this Turkish coast and the nearby Greek islands is the limited number of marine caves suitable for resting and/or pupping. We identified four caves as possible monk seal resting and pupping caves. An additional cave with all essential features for seal usage except a ledge was also identified. An artificial ledge was built in this cave in July 2019 and seal usage was monitored by camera trap until September 2020. A total of 405 camera-trap events were analysed to examine presence of any monk seals on the ledge, and to understand the purpose (resting and/or pupping), frequency of use, sex and age group of any individuals using the cave. One juvenile used the cave four times for resting (420 minutes in total), predominantly nocturnally. This is the first construction of a dry ledge in a cave of this kind for monk seals. The camera recordings suggest this approach could provide habitat for this species in areas where there is insufficient dry protected area on land.

Type
Short Communication
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International

The Mediterranean monk seal Monachus monachus is categorized as Endangered on the IUCN Red List, with a total of 600–700 individuals in three known subpopulations distributed across the eastern Atlantic and the eastern Mediterranean coasts (Karamanlidis & Dendrinos, Reference Karamanlidis and Dendrinos2015). The largest subpopulation in the eastern Mediterranean comprises 350–450 individuals (Karamanlidis et al., Reference Karamanlidis, Adamantopoulou, Tounta and Dendrinos2019). Approximately 100 of these are in the coastal waters of Turkey (Güçlüsoy et al., Reference Güçlüsoy, Kıraç, Veryeri and Savaş2004), 14 in north-west and southern Cyprus (Nicolaou et al., Reference Nicolaou, Dendrinos, Marcou, Michaelides and Karamanlidis2019) and seven in northern Cyprus (Beton et al., Reference Beton, Broderick, Godley, Kolaç, Ok and Snape2021). The species is subject to multiple anthropogenic threats, including deliberate killings and the entanglement of subadults in fishing nets. However, the most significant threats to monk seals in the eastern Mediterranean are habitat deterioration, destruction and fragmentation (Karamanlidis et al., Reference Karamanlidis, Adamantopoulou, Tounta and Dendrinos2019).

Suitable marine cave habitats are essential for monk seals to haul out and rest or raise pups. Here we investigate the provision of artificial habitat for monk seals. There have been trials of a similar approach for other species: e.g. nest-boxes for the European roller Coracias garrulus (Monti et al., Reference Monti, Nelli, Catoni and Dell'Omo2019), nesting platforms for the white stork Ciconia ciconia (Döndüren, Reference Döndüren2015) and man-made snowdrifts for Saimaa ringed seals Phoca hispida saimensis (Auttila, Reference Auttila2015).

Gökova Bay in the eastern Aegean Sea, on the south-west Mediterranean coast of Turkey (Fig. 1) has a marine area of 1,851 km2, with diverse marine habitats important for multiple species (Ünal et al., Reference Ünal, Kizilkaya and Yildirim2015). It comprises both Gökova and Datça-Bozburun Special Environmental Protection Areas (Güçlüsoy, Reference Güçlüsoy, Katağan, Tokaç, Beşiktepe and Öztürk2015). Datça-Bozburun consists of two peninsulas, Reşadiye (Datça) Peninsula and Bozburun Peninsula, and with a total marine area of 737 km2 it is the largest Special Environmental Protection Area in the Turkish Mediterranean Sea (Güçlüsoy, Reference Güçlüsoy, Katağan, Tokaç, Beşiktepe and Öztürk2015). Prior to this study, there had been no camera-trap monitoring of Mediterranean monk seals in Gökova Bay.

Fig. 1 The location of the Gökova and Datça-Bozburun Special Environmental Protection Areas in the eastern Mediterranean, and the 322 km length of coastal area Gökova Bay surveyed. The exact locations of the caves mentioned in this article are not provided, for the security of the species.

During 2016–2017 we surveyed Mediterranean monk seal habitat along most of Gökova Bay's 322 km coastline (Saydam & Güçlüsoy, Reference Saydam and Güçlüsoy2019), and interviewed local fishers and sailors to identify the locations of any marine caves potentially suitable for Mediterranean monk seals to breed and rest. We examined potential caves by snorkelling (Karamanlidis et al., Reference Karamanlidis, Pires, Silva and Neves2004; Dendrinos et al., Reference Dendrinos, Karamanlidis, Kotomatas, Legakis, Tounta and Matthiopoulos2007), and we installed camera traps in the four suitable caves located.

In October 2017, we discovered one marine cave without a dry ledge that was otherwise suitable for seals and could potentially provide protection from inclement weather. An area within the cave suitable for the construction of an artificial ledge, at the end of the cave (Fig. 2, Plate 1a), did not have any marine habitat formations that would require the cave to be otherwise protected (Öztürk, Reference Öztürk2019). We constructed the artificial ledge during 22–24 June and 20 July 2019. The final level of the ledge was designed to be 10 cm above sea level during high tide, to keep the ledge dry in rough weather.

Fig. 2 The dimensions of the marine cave in which the ledge was constructed (Plate 1).

Plate 1 (a) The cave (Fig. 2) prior to construction of the dry ledge, (b) following construction of the ledge, and (c) a juvenile monk seal Monachus monachus using the ledge.

Jute sacks, with a volume of c. 27 l, filled with a sand and cement mixture at a ratio of c. 350 kg of pozzolanic cement (TS EN 197-1 CEM IV/B (P) 32.5 N) to 1 m3 gravelly sand, boulders and crushed stone were transferred by truck to a loading point 11 km from the cave. We transported all materials on an 8.5 m fishing boat to the cave entrance. The boulders weighing 10–25 kg each, and crushed stone, were transferred in a rigid inflatable boat to the opening of the narrow chamber of the cave and then moved in large buckets or by hand. The boulders (filling a total area of 4 m3) were laid as the foundation and 300 kg of crushed stone was used to fill the spaces between them. The jute sacks were then transported from the fishing boat by a canoe to the ledge location, to keep them dry. A total of 120 jute sacks were laid on the foundation, to become wet and thus for the sand and cement mixture to set (Plate 1b).

During 24 June 2019–17 September 2020 we monitored the cave using a camera trap, visiting once every 2 months to download any recordings and replace batteries. The camera was set in hybrid-mode, to take three consecutive photographs and a 15-s video for each trigger. The recordings from the 405 events were analysed to determine any use of the cave by seals, and the purpose (resting and/or pupping), frequency of use, and to identify the sex and age group of any seals (Samaranch & González, Reference Samaranch and González2000).

The recordings revealed that a monk seal first used the artificial ledge 8 months after construction (Table 1, Plate 1c) and on three additional occasions (Table 2), with the longest stay nearly 5 h. Its size, inferred relative to the dimension of the jute sacks, and morphology indicated it was a juvenile. It mostly used the cave nocturnally (Table 1). The proximity of other caves suitable for seals in Gökova Bay (c. 20 km and 84 km away) may have contributed to the discoverability of the ledge by monk seals.

Table 1 Details of the camera-trap recordings from the cave (Figs 1 & 2, Plate 1) in which we constructed a ledge for the monk seal Monachus monachus. Each event comprises three images (taken at 1-s intervals) and one 15-s video.

Table 2 Details of the use of the marine cave by a juvenile monk seal.

This intervention was the first construction of an artificial dry ledge in a marine cave for Mediterranean monk seals, and the first to provide evidence that such a ledge can be discovered and used by a seal. As habitat loss and degradation are the most significant threats to this species, increasing the number of potential cave habitats for resting and/or pupping by improving cave structure could potentially be an important method for the conservation and protection of this species. However, consideration of impacts on existing habitats (e.g. those of sessile invertebrates inside caves), alongside discussions with monk seal experts, responsible governmental agencies and any local stakeholders, is essential. The use of this artificial ledge by an Endangered Mediterranean monk seal contributes potentially important information to support future conservation of the species. Future monitoring should determine the suitability of this artificial habitat for pupping, which is key to supporting monk seal populations. We continue to monitor this cave by camera trap.

Acknowledgements

We thank colleagues and volunteers with the Mediterranean Conservation Society for their collaboration during this study, Gabriella Church and Katy Walker of Fauna & Flora International for their comments, and the Prince Bernhard Nature Fund, Fauna & Flora International and the Endangered Landscapes Programme, which is managed by the Cambridge Conservation Initiative and funded by Arcadia, a charitable trust of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin, for their support.

Author contributions

Ledge design: ES, ZAK; monitoring design: all authors; fieldwork: ES, ZAK; data analysis, writing: ES, HG.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical standards

This research abided by the Oryx guidelines on ethical standards. The permit for ledge construction and monitoring was provided by the Turkish Ministry of Environment and Urbanization (24 May 2019, 70879856-250-E.117731).

Footnotes

*

Also at: The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey

References

Auttila, M. (2015) The Endangered Saimaa ringed seal in a changing climate—challenges for conservation and monitoring. PhD thesis. University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.Google Scholar
Beton, D., Broderick, A.C., Godley, B.J., Kolaç, E., Ok, M. & Snape, R.T.E. (2021) New monitoring confirms regular breeding of the Mediterranean monk seal in Northern Cyprus. Oryx, 55, 522525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dendrinos, P., Karamanlidis, A.A., Kotomatas, S., Legakis, A., Tounta, E. & Matthiopoulos, J. (2007) Pupping habitat use in the Mediterranean monk seal: a long-term study. Marine Mammal Science, 23, 615628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döndüren, Ö. (2015) Research on determining the population size, population changes and factors effecting population and migration dynamics of white stork (Ciconia ciconia L., 1758) in the Gediz River basin. PhD thesis. Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.Google Scholar
Güçlüsoy, H. (2015) Marine and coastal protected areas of Turkish Aegean coasts. In The Aegean Sea Marine Biodiversity, Fisheries, Conservation and Governance (eds Katağan, T., Tokaç, A., Beşiktepe, Ş. & Öztürk, B.), pp. 669684. Turkish Marine Research Foundation, Publication No. 41, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
Güçlüsoy, H., Kıraç, C.O., Veryeri, N.O. & Savaş, Y. (2004) Status of the Mediterranean monk seal, Monachus monachus (Hermann, 1779) in the coastal waters of Turkey. E.U. Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, 21, 201210.Google Scholar
Karamanlidis, A.A., Adamantopoulou, S., Tounta, E. & Dendrinos, P. (2019) Monachus monachus (Eastern Mediterranean subpopulation). In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019. dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-1.RLTS.T120868935A120869697.en [accessed 27 October 2021].Google Scholar
Karamanlidis, A. & Dendrinos, P. (2015) Monachus monachus (errata version published in 2017). In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015. dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T13653A45227543.en [accessed 13 November 2021].Google Scholar
Karamanlidis, A.A., Pires, R., Silva, N.C. & Neves, H.C. (2004) The availability of resting and pupping habitat for the Critically Endangered Mediterranean monk seal Monachus monachus in the archipelago of Madeira. Oryx, 38, 180185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monti, F., Nelli, L., Catoni, C. & Dell'Omo, G. (2019) Nest box selection and reproduction of European rollers in central Italy: a 7-year study. Avian Research, 10, 13.Google Scholar
Nicolaou, H., Dendrinos, P., Marcou, M., Michaelides, S. & Karamanlidis, A.A. (2019) Re-establishment of the Mediterranean monk seal Monachus monachus in Cyprus: priorities for conservation. Oryx, 55, 526528.Google Scholar
Öztürk, B. (ed.) (2019) Marine Caves of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Biodiversity, Threats and Conservation. Turkish Marine Research Foundation (TUDAV) Publication, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
Samaranch, R. & González, L.M. (2000) Changes in morphology with age in Mediterranean monk seals (Monachus monachus). Marine Mammal Science, 16, 141157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saydam, E. & Güçlüsoy, H. (2019) The Cave Use of Mediterranean Monk Seal (Monachus monachus) in the Gökova Special Environmental Protection Area between 2016 and 2018. Book of Abstracts, 9–12 December 2019, pp. 388–389. World Marine Mammal Conference, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
Ünal, V., Kizilkaya, Z. & Yildirim, D. (2015) How could we convince fisheries stakeholders to establish no-take-zones? Lessons from small-scale fisheries in Gökova Bay (eastern Mediterranean), Turkey. In First Regional Symposium on Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the Mediterranean and Black Sea, Saint Julian's, Malta, 27–30 November 2013 (eds A. Srour, N. Ferri, D. Bourdenet, D. Fezzardi & A. Nastasi), pp. 201–208. Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings, No. 39, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 The location of the Gökova and Datça-Bozburun Special Environmental Protection Areas in the eastern Mediterranean, and the 322 km length of coastal area Gökova Bay surveyed. The exact locations of the caves mentioned in this article are not provided, for the security of the species.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 The dimensions of the marine cave in which the ledge was constructed (Plate 1).

Figure 2

Plate 1 (a) The cave (Fig. 2) prior to construction of the dry ledge, (b) following construction of the ledge, and (c) a juvenile monk seal Monachus monachus using the ledge.

Figure 3

Table 1 Details of the camera-trap recordings from the cave (Figs 1 & 2, Plate 1) in which we constructed a ledge for the monk seal Monachus monachus. Each event comprises three images (taken at 1-s intervals) and one 15-s video.

Figure 4

Table 2 Details of the use of the marine cave by a juvenile monk seal.