Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-08T17:36:45.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender marking in the first-person singular: A case of paradigm (in)consistency – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2023

THOMAS BERG Open the ORCID record for THOMAS BERG [Opens in a new window]
THOMAS BERG*
Affiliation:
University of Hamburg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Erratum
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , August 2024 , pp. 713 - 714
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

In the Journal of Linguistics article ‘Gender marking in the first-person singular: A case of paradigm (in)consistency’ by Thomas Berg, table 1 was formatted incorrectly, which resulted in row 27 moving out of line.

The correctly formatted table can be seen below:

Table 1 Languages with a gender contrast in first-person singular personal pronouns (N = 30).

References

REFERENCE

Berg, Thomas. (2023). Gender marking in the first-person singular: A case of paradigm (in)consistency. Journal of Linguistics, 1–35. doi:10.1017/S0022226723000191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Languages with a gender contrast in first-person singular personal pronouns (N = 30).