Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:15:02.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Authors' reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2022

Antje A. T. S. Reinders
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, UK Email: [email protected], [email protected]
Allan H. Young
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, UK
Dick J. Veltman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

We welcome the opportunity to respond to Corrigan & Hull's response to our editorialReference Reinders and Veltman1 that presented neurobiological evidence for a trauma-related aetiology of dissociative identity disorder (DID). Corrigan & Hull offer an important additional reason to our proposed DID-dismissive perspectives, namely that DID treatment is considered prohibitively expensive. Not only do they point out costs because of the length of phase-oriented treatmentReference Nijenhuis2 and its unpredictable non-linear course, they also highlight the costs involved in the training of staff because DID treatment requires specialised skills currently not developed during psychiatrists’ training. They conclude that the evidence for DID should be followed by clinicians and that appropriate treatment will cost less overall than leaving disorders involving pathological dissociation untreated.

An important avenue that might reduce treatment length, and therefore treatment costs, is pharmacological intervention. Corrigan & Hull state that medication is of limited value, but to date no double-blind placebo-controlled studies have been performed with the aim to develop evidence-based pharmacotherapy to alleviate pathological dissociative symptoms in DID. However, it has been proposed that kappa-opioid receptor antagonists may be of interest for the selective pharmacological targeting of debilitating dissociative symptoms in post-traumatic stress disorder and trans-diagnostically.Reference Roydeva and Reinders3 Abnormal serotonin neurotransmission in frontal and temporal regions has been found in relation to dissociative amnesia in a positron emission tomography receptor binding studyReference Roydeva and Reinders3 and therefore serotonergic medication might also be of interest to treat pathological dissociative symptoms. In addition, the authors would like to offer the consideration of a glutamate hypothesis for dissociation on the basis of scientific evidence that (a) the glutamatergic agent ketamine induces dissociative symptoms in humansReference Luckenbaugh, Niciu, Ionescu, Nolan, Richards and Brutsche4 and in animal models,Reference Vesuna, Kauvar, Richman, Gore, Oskotsky and Sava-Segal5 (b) the psychotropic drug lamotrigine can reduce dissociative symptoms induced by ketamine in healthy individuals,Reference Belli, Akbudak, Ural and Aslaner6 (c) glutamatergic hyperactivity could be relevant in the neurobiology of depersonalisation and (d) lamotrigine can be an augmenting treatment to reduce dissociative symptoms in depersonalisation disorder,Reference Belli, Akbudak, Ural and Aslaner6 and (e) anterior cingulate glutamate concentration correlates positively with dissociative symptoms in individuals with borderline personality.Reference Roydeva and Reinders3 Glutamate concentrations in the brain of individuals with pathological dissociation can relatively easily be measured using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, which may provide information on whether glutamate is a neurochemical biomarker of dissociation.

Although more has become known about what happens in the dissociated brain and functional neurocorrelates of pathological dissociationReference Reinders and Veltman1, Reference Roydeva and Reinders3 are being unravelled, it remains largely unknown how dissociative symptoms are mediated in the brain at a neurotransmitter level. Neurobiological research into the neurochemical biomarkers of pathological dissociation could possibly lead to the development of pharmacological agents that facilitate more rapid symptom alleviation. Although the development of such pharmacological interventions offers a challenge for the scientific community, they are expected to reduce the treatment costs of individuals with DID.

Declaration of interest

None.

References

Reinders, AATS, Veltman, DJ. Dissociative identity disorder: out of the shadows at last? Br J Psychiatry 2020; https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2020.168.Google ScholarPubMed
Nijenhuis, ERS. The Trinity of Trauma: Ignorance, Fragility, and Control: The Evolving Concept of Trauma/The Concept and Facts of Dissociation in Trauma. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2015.Google Scholar
Roydeva, MI, Reinders, AATS. Biomarkers of pathological dissociation: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2021; 123: 120202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luckenbaugh, DA, Niciu, MJ, Ionescu, DF, Nolan, NM, Richards, EM, Brutsche, NE, et al. Do the dissociative side effects of ketamine mediate its antidepressant effects? J Affect Disord 2014; 159: 5661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vesuna, S, Kauvar, IV, Richman, E, Gore, F, Oskotsky, T, Sava-Segal, C, et al. Deep posteromedial cortical rhythm in dissociation. Nature 2020; 586: 8794.10.1038/s41586-020-2731-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belli, H, Akbudak, M, Ural, C, Aslaner, D. A Case of depersonalization with treatment-resistant depression successfully treated with sertraline-lamotrigine combination. West Indian Med J 2014; 63: 115.Google ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.