Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:23:50.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Global and local evolutionary dynamics of Dengue virus serotypes 1, 3, and 4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2023

Arshi Islam
Affiliation:
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Basic Sciences, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
Farah Deeba
Affiliation:
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Basic Sciences, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
Bansidhar Tarai
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, Max Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
Ekta Gupta
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Virology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
Irshad H. Naqvi
Affiliation:
Dr. M.A. Ansari Health Centre, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
Mohd. Abdullah
Affiliation:
Dr. M.A. Ansari Health Centre, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
Ravins Dohare
Affiliation:
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Basic Sciences, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
Anwar Ahmed
Affiliation:
Centre of Excellence in Biotechnology Research, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Fahad N. Almajhdi
Affiliation:
Centre of Excellence in Biotechnology Research, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Tajamul Hussain
Affiliation:
Centre of Excellence in Biotechnology Research, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Shama Parveen*
Affiliation:
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Basic Sciences, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
*
Corresponding author: Shama Parveen; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Evolutionary studies on Dengue virus (DENV) in endemic regions are necessary since naturally occurring mutations may lead to genotypic variations or shifts in serotypes, which may lead to future outbreaks. Our study comprehends the evolutionary dynamics of DENV, using phylogenetic, molecular clock, skyline plots, network, selection pressure, and entropy analyses based on partial CprM gene sequences. We have collected 250 samples, 161 in 2017 and 89 in 2018. Details for the 2017 samples were published in our previous article and that of 2018 are presented in this study. Further evolutionary analysis was carried out using 800 sequences, which incorporate the study and global sequences from GenBank: DENV-1 (n = 240), DENV-3 (n = 374), and DENV-4 (n = 186), identified during 1944–2020, 1956–2020, and 1956–2021, respectively. Genotypes V, III, and I were identified as the predominant genotypes of the DENV-1, DENV-3, and DENV-4 serotypes, respectively. The rate of nucleotide substitution was found highest in DENV-3 (7.90 × 10−4 s/s/y), followed by DENV-4 (6.23 × 10−4 s/s/y) and DENV-1 (5.99 × 10−4 s/s/y). The Bayesian skyline plots of the Indian strains revealed dissimilar patterns amongst the population size of the three serotypes. Network analyses showed the presence of different clusters within the prevalent genotypes. The data presented in this study will assist in supplementing the measures for vaccine development against DENV.

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Dengue infection in humans is widespread and mainly occurs in tropical and subtropical geographical locations, with an estimated occurrence of 400 million annual infections globally [Reference Bhatt, Gething, Brady, Messina, Farlow, Moyes, Drake, Brownstein, Hoen, Sankoh, Myers, George, Jaenisch, Wint, Simmons, Scott, Farrar and Hay1]. The disease, caused by the Dengue virus (DENV), ranges from an acute febrile illness known as Dengue fever (DF) to life-threatening Dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) or Dengue shock syndrome (DSS) [Reference Kalayanarooj2]. DENV is classified into the family Flaviviridae and genus Flavivirus. The approximate length of the positive-sense, single-stranded RNA Dengue virus genome is 10.7 kb, which encodes an open reading frame that translates into three structural (capsid, C; membrane, M; and envelope, E) and seven non-structural proteins (NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, and NS5) [Reference El Sahili and Lescar3].

Various locations in the world have become hyperendemic due to the occurrence of antigenically distinct serotypes of the Dengue virus. Globally, most of the Dengue outbreak cases were reported in the Western Pacific Region after 2010, with cases mostly being identified in China, Malaysia, and Singapore [Reference Guo, Zhou, Wen, Liu, Zeng, Xiao, Ou, Han, Huang, Liu, Ye, Zou, Wu, Wang, Zeng, Jing and Yang4]. These frequent life-threatening outbreaks poorly affect a country’s economy and its health system. Apart from the aforementioned Asian countries, the Indian subcontinent has shown a complex epidemiological pattern of Dengue infection in reference to the prevalent strains of the antigenically distinct DENV serotypes, which further impacts the severity of the disease [Reference Ganeshkumar, Murhekar, Poornima, Saravanakumar, Sukumaran, Anandaselvasankar, John and Mehendale5]. The existence of the Dengue virus in India was first reported in the year 1946 [Reference Gupta, Srivastava, Jain and Chaturvedi6]. Since that breakthrough, many outbreaks with a significant proportion of deaths have been reported from different geographical regions of the country [Reference Kukreti, Dash, Parida, Chaudhary, Saxena, Rautela, Mittal, Chhabra, Bhattacharya, Lal, Rao and Rai7Reference Islam, Abdullah, Tazeen, Naqvi, Kazim, Ahmed, Alamery, Malik and Parveen9].

The genotypic variations of the Dengue virus contribute majorly to such outbreaks or epidemics. Hence, for a high-throughput vaccine-designing protocol and, eventually, to combat the severe consequences of the disease, regular molecular surveillance of DENV is much needed so that genotypes can be established and their further dispersal in a country can be avoided. In view of the same, the present study aims to comprehend the diversity of the Dengue virus serotypes by analysing their genotypic relationships, origin, circulation pattern, and global expansion.

In the present study, we have carried out a CprM gene-based phylogenetic and molecular clock analysis of the Dengue virus, including the study and global strains. The study strains of the DENV were identified in 2017 and 2018, in our investigation. Site-specific selection pressures and entropy analyses were also performed to detect the sites that are prone to mutation in this conserved region of the DENV genome. We have also analysed the genotypic relationships of the Dengue virus using median-joining networks of the respective serotypes. Locally, the discrepancies in the Indian population of a particular serotype were also analysed using Bayesian skyline plots.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

Patients with Dengue fever–like symptoms were recruited for the present study. The study was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee, Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI), and it was performed in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. The blood samples were collected from the Out Patient Department (OPD) of the Dr. M.A. Ansari Health Centre of the university. The clinical proformas and written informed consent (in both Hindi and English languages) of the enrolled patients were also maintained by the clinicians.

RNA extraction from the serum samples

The process of centrifugation was used for the separation of the serum from the collected blood samples. The samples were centrifuged at a speed of 3,000 rpm for about 10 minutes at 4°C. The total viral RNA was isolated from the 140 μl serum samples using QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted RNA was stored at −80°C.

cDNA synthesis

The extracted RNA from the serum samples was used for the synthesis of cDNA. The reaction was carried out using the commercially available High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA). The reaction conditions to perform cDNA synthesis were already standardised in our laboratory [Reference Islam, Abdullah, Tazeen, Afreen, Deeba, Hussain Naqvi, Kazim, Broor, Ahmed and Parveen10].

Serotyping of Dengue virus

The detection of the Dengue virus was done by external PCR using forward and reverse primer. The serotype-specific PCR (semi-nested) for the conserved CprM region of the Dengue virus was carried out using primers published by Lanciotti et al. [Reference Lanciotti, Calisher, Gubler, Chang and Vorndam11]. Both external and semi-nested PCR reactions were performed in accordance with the standardised protocol in our laboratory [Reference Islam, Abdullah, Tazeen, Afreen, Deeba, Hussain Naqvi, Kazim, Broor, Ahmed and Parveen10].

Amplification and sequencing

The semi-nested PCR was used for the amplification of the partial sequence of the CprM region of the identified DENV strains. The DNA was further extracted from the agarose gel using the commercially available Plus DNA Clean/ Extraction Kit (GeneMark, Taiwan) in accordance with the instructions provided by the manufacturers. To avoid any uncertainty in obtaining the consensus sequences, the sequencing was done in both forward and reverse directions using outsource services (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA). The ambiguities were resolved manually from the nucleotide sequences using the softwares GeneDoc (v2.7) and BioEdit (v.7.2). The obtained consensus sequences were confirmed by the online BLAST tool at NCBI (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) prior to the analyses.

Phylogenetic analysis

The phylogenetic trees for DENV were constructed using sequences published in GenBank. The alignment of the sequences was done in BioEdit (v.7.2) software. The tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood method in MEGA6 (v 6.06) software [Reference Tamura, Stecher, Peterson, Filipski and Kumar12]. The model for the tree construction in MEGA6 was selected by Akaike information criterion (AIC) using jModelTest2 on XSEDE (2.1.6), CIPRES portal [Reference Miller, Pfeiffer and Schwartz13]. The robustness of the tree was assessed with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The prototype strains used for the phylogenetic analysis were US/Hawaii/1944 of DENV-1 (Accession number: EU848545), H87 strain of DENV-3 (Accession number: M93130), and H241 strain of DENV-4 (Accession number: KR011349).

Data selection

Sequences from the same year were down-sampled when they fell within a monophyletic group in the same genotype and same country. Following this downsizing, subsequent root-to-tip analysis was performed on TempEST v1.5.3 to assess the strength of the signal in the resulting dataset. The TempEst requires a ‘nonclock’ phylogenetic tree which utilises branch lengths scaled as genetic distances instead of temporal distances. This tree was obtained by IQ-TREE software (package available on CIPRES portal v2.1.2) using maximum likelihood. The nucleotide substitution model of the resulting dataset was selected on the basis of AIC using jModelTest2.

Bayesian Markov Chain Monte-Carlo analysis

The analysis was performed using strict and relaxed molecular clock. The relaxed molecular clock includes uncorrelated lognormal and exponential models. Three demographic models were used with each clock. The models were constant size, Bayesian skyline, and exponential growth. At least two independent runs were performed for each combination of the clock and demographic model. The Markov Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) chain was run at a length of 60 million (DENV-3 and DENV-4) and 100 million (DENV-1). The best-fit model was chosen by path-sampling and stepping-stone methods. The two tree files and the two log files of the selected best-fit model were combined using LogCombiner 1.10.4 (implemented in BEASTv1.10.4) and Tracer v1.7.1, respectively, with 10% burn-ins removed from each run. The resulting log files were analysed in Tracer to ascertain the convergence of the MCMC chain and to ensure that an effective sample size of (ESS) >200 for all parameters was achieved. The uncertainty in the estimates of the parameters was assessed by 95% HPD interval. The maximum clade credibility tree was generated by Tree Annotator 1.10.4 (implemented in BEAST), and the resulting tree file was visualised in the program FigTree 1.4.4. Support for the node on the tree was ascertained by the Bayesian posterior probability (BPP) values for each node.

Bayesian skyline plots

The Bayesian skyline plots (BSP) of the Indian DENV strains were also inferred using this BEAST package that enabled a graphical depiction of changing levels of population size through time. The graphical interpretation elucidated the variations in the median estimation of relative hereditary diversity (Ne τ) of DENV with time (Ne and τ denote effective population size and generation time, respectively). The analysis was done using the MCMC approach implemented in the BEAST package (v1.10.4). The skyline plot was generated from the MCMC output using Tracer v1.7.1.

Median-joining network analysis

The median-joining network was used to visualise genetic relationships in the nucleotide sequences of the CprM region of DENV. The network was constructed using Network 10.2 software. The analysis was performed with the datasets used for the construction of a phylogenetic tree. DnaSP v. 5.10.01 software was used for the preparation of an alignment file for further use in network analysis.

Selection pressure analysis

The CprM region of DENV was subjected to selection pressure analysis using the online web server Datamonkey (http://www.datamonkey.org). The ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous mutations (dN/dS) was determined using four different analytical methods: single likelihood ancestor counting (SLAC), fixed effects likelihood (FEL), mixed effects model of evolution (MEME), and fast, unconstrained Bayesian approximation (FUBAR). The genomic region selection can be categorised into three types in accordance with the ratio of mean dN/dS: negatively selected when the ratio is less than 1; positively selected when the ratio is greater than 1; and neutral selection when the ratio is equal to 1. In this study, the different parameters (p-value and posterior probability) were considered for a site to be positively selected. We have considered those codon positions under positive selection which were selected by at least two different analytical methods.

Shannon entropy analysis

The amino acid sequences of the CprM region of DENV were subjected to Shannon entropy analysis in BioEdit (v.7.2.) software. A high entropy score at a particular site signifies an increased likelihood of variation at that position. The final data was illustrated as an entropy graph between residue numbers (alignment positions) versus entropy (Hx).

Results

Characteristics of the enrolled patients

Eligible subjects attending the Out Patient Department (OPD) of the Dr. M.A. Ansari Health Centre at the Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, were recruited for the present study. Fever was observed in almost all the patients enrolled in the study. The other symptoms were rashes, headache, vomiting, nausea, retro-orbital pain, and weakness. None of the patients was found infected with critical conditions of Dengue fever (DHF/DSS). The inclusion and exclusion criteria for all the samples collected in the study during 2017 and 2018 (n = 250) are given in Figure 1 and are already published in our previous article [Reference Islam, Abdullah, Tazeen, Naqvi, Kazim, Ahmed, Alamery, Malik and Parveen9]. The demographic and serotype detection details of the patients enrolled in the study during 2018 are given in Supplementary Table S1. The clinical details for the 2017 samples are published in our previous article [Reference Islam, Abdullah, Tazeen, Naqvi, Kazim, Ahmed, Alamery, Malik and Parveen9].

Figure 1. Overview of the study. The figure illustrates the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the sample collection, serotype detection during 2017 and 2018, and the numeric details of the sequences utilised in evolutionary analysis.

Serotype detection during 2018

A total of 89 serum samples were tested for DENV during the post-monsoon season of 2018. Twenty-eight samples (32%) were identified as positive for DENV infection. DENV-3 and DENV-4 serotypes were identified in the study with the predominance of DENV-3. Twenty-six samples (93%) were positive for DENV-3 and two samples (7%) were positive for DENV-4 (Figure 1).

DNA sequencing and data selection

The partial sequences of the CprM region were used for the analysis. Five samples were sequenced for DENV-3 and two for DENV-4 in 2018. The obtained consensus sequences were verified by the BLAST tool at NCBI. We have also utilised our study sequences of DENV-1(n = 2) and DENV-3 (n = 16) identified in 2017 for the evolutionary analysis. The numeric details of the sequences used in evolutionary analysis are given in Figure 1. The serotypic and genotypic details of the 2017 and 2018 study strains with their accession numbers are given in Supplementary Table S2. Further details and selection of the sequences for evolutionary analyses of DENV-1, DENV-3, and DENV-4 are provided in Supplementary Table S3.

Phylogenetic analysis of Dengue virus 1

The phylogenetic tree of DENV-1 was generated using 240 partial CprM gene sequences that also include the two study strains identified in 2017 in our investigation. The length of the aligned region was 429 bp (143 amino acids), which corresponds to 135 to 563 bp of the full genome of the prototype strain. The study sequences got assembled within genotype V along with other Indian strains (Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure S1).

Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of DENV-1 (n = 240). The tree was generated using the maximum likelihood approach using partial CprM gene sequences of DENV-1. The study sequences clustered in genotype V are highlighted in black with the symbol ▲. The arrows are used to provide more clarity to the illustration. The sequences used in the tree are shown by their accession number followed by country and the date of collection.

Eight mutations (V26G, L46M, M51I, G70S, L72F, N90S, S93N, and I150L) were identified in the study strains when compared to the full-length amino acid sequence of the prototype strain. These mutations were also reported in earlier studies [Reference Gupta, Srivastava, Jain and Chaturvedi6]. The study strains showed a genetic distance of 6.4% and 5.8% at nucleotide and amino acid levels, respectively, in contrast to the prototype strain.

Phylogenetic analysis of Dengue virus 3

A total of 374 partial CprM gene sequences including 21 study sequences of Dengue virus 3 were used for the construction of a phylogenetic tree. Sixteen and 5 samples were identified as positive for DENV-3 in 2017 and 2018, respectively. The aligned region of 285 bp (95 amino acids) of the CprM region corresponds to 137 to 421 bp of the full genome of the prototype strain (H87 strain: GenBank Accession number: M93130). The identified study strains clustered with the sequences of genotype III from India, Pakistan, and China (Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure S2).

Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of DENV-3 (n = 374). The tree was generated using the maximum likelihood approach using partial CprM gene sequences of DENV-3. The study sequences clustered in genotype III are highlighted in black with the symbol ▲. The sequences of other genotypes were collapsed as arrows for better illustration. The sequences used in the tree are shown by their accession number followed by country and the date of collection.

Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of DENV-4 (n = 186). The tree was generated using the maximum likelihood approach using partial CprM gene sequences of DENV-4. The study sequences clustered in genotype I are highlighted in black with the symbol ▲. The arrows are used to provide more clarity to the illustration. The sequences used in the tree are shown by their accession number followed by country and the date of collection.

Three mutations V19A, R35K, and M108I were identified in the study strains in contrast to the full-length amino acid sequence of the prototype strain. All these mutations were also detected in earlier published sequences [Reference King, Chao, Chien, Chang, Lin, Wu and Huang14, Reference Parveen, Islam, Tazeen, Hisamuddin, Abdullah, Naqvi, Faizan, Gulyani, Ahmed and Parveen15]. The study strains showed nucleotide distance in the range of 6.7–7.5% and amino acid distance of 2.1% with respect to the prototype strain.

Phylogenetic analysis of Dengue virus 4

Phylogenetic analysis of DENV-4 was conducted by aligning CprM gene sequences of the study strains with other publicly available sequences retrieved from GenBank. The alignment comprises of a total of 186 sequences including two study strains of DENV-4 identified in 2018. The aligned region corresponds to 138–479 bp (342 bp) of the full genome of the prototype strain (H241 strain: GenBank Accession number: KR011349). The study strains grouped together with the sequences of previously identified Indian strains of genotype I (Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure S3).

Three amino acid mutations were identified in the study sequences as compared to the full-length protein sequence of the prototype strain. The mutations were E18A, M102I, and V111A. These mutations were also detected in previously identified strains of DENV-4 [Reference Calderón-Arguedas, Troyo, Moreira-Soto, Marín and Taylor16, Reference Sasmono, Wahid, Trimarsanto, Yohan, Wahyuni, Hertanto, Yusuf, Mubin, Ganda, Latief, Bifani, Shi and Schreiber17]. The study strains showed nucleotide distance up to 3.6% as compared to the prototype strains. The sequences showed an amino acid distance of 1.8%.

Bayesian MCMC analysis of DENV-1

The dataset of DENV-1 strains (n = 170), including all its six genotypes, showed a positive temporal signal (R 2 = 0.11) (Supplementary Figure S4A) and was proceeded further for molecular clock analysis. The best-fit nucleotide substitution model for the dataset was chosen as TrN + I + G (gamma categories = 4). Strict clock and Bayesian skyline tree prior were chosen as the best-fit models in the molecular clock analysis as suggested by the Bayes factor (Table 1).

Table 1. Log marginal likelihoods by path sampling and stepping-stone sampling for DENV-1, DENV-3, and DENV-4

The maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree of n = 170 DENV-1 sequences was generated in Fig tree v1.4.1 using the best-fit model as shown in Figure 5 (Supplementary Figure S5).

Figure 5. Maximum clade credibility tree of DENV-1 (n = 170). The tree was generated with the best-fit strict clock, Bayesian skyline model. Node ages are denoted at each node. The arrows are used to provide more clarity to the illustration.

The mean nucleotide substitution rate under the strict clock was detected to be 5.99 × 10−4 substitutions per site per year (95% HPD (4.77 × 10−4–7.25 × 10−4 s/s/y)). The age from the root was estimated to be approximately 314 years (95% HPD (229–426 years)), 1706 (95% HPD (1597–1796)). Similarly, the time to the most recent common ancestor (tMRCA) for genotype V was about 77 years (95% HPD (69–87 years)). Further, the study strains of DENV-1 clustered in genotype V were found to be approximately 4 years old (95% HPD (3–6 years)). Likewise, tMRCA for genotype I, II, and IV was estimated around 97, 80, and 59 years.

Bayesian MCMC analysis of DENV-3

The dataset of DENV-3 strains (n = 190) was established for molecular clock analysis as it showed a sufficient temporal signal by the TempEst (R 2 = 0.31) (Supplementary Figure S4B). TrN + I + G (with gamma-distributed rate variation among sites, four categories) was selected as the best-fit nucleotide substitution model for the DENV-3 dataset. Strict clock and exponential growth tree prior were chosen as the best-fit models, suggested by the Bayes factor (Table 1). Maximum clade credibility tree of n = 190 DENV-3 sequences was constructed with this model as shown in Figure 6 (Supplementary Figure S6).

Figure 6. Maximum clade credibility tree of DENV-3 (n = 190). The tree was generated with the best-fit strict clock, exponential growth model. Node ages are denoted at each node. The arrows are used to provide more clarity to the illustration.

The mean nucleotide substitution rate under the strict clock was detected to be 7.90 × 10−4 substitutions per site per year (95% HPD (5.83 × 10−4–10.17 × 10−4 s/s/y)) under the best-fit model. The root of the tree diverging into four genotypes of DENV-3 (I, II, III, and V) was estimated to be 86 years old (95% HPD (72–103 years)), 1934 (95% HPD (1917–1948)). The Indian isolate JQ92255 and the isolates of DENV-3 from other countries clustered in genotype III had a mean age of about 60 years (95% HPD (54–69 years)) with almost 100% posterior probability. The mean age of the node indicating divergence of genotype III and genotype II in the best-fit model with respect to the CprM partial gene was around 74 years (95% HPD (62–88 years)). Similarly, the mean age indicating divergence between genotype I and genotype V is 75 years (95% HPD (67–86 years)). The tMRCA of genotype I and II was about 52 (95% HPD (42–62 years)) and 53 (95% HPD (47–60 years)) years, respectively. The tMRCA of genotype V was about 66 years (95% HPD (64–70 years)). The Indian lineage consisting of the study strains was shown to have an age of about 17 years (95% HPD (14–20 years)) (Figure 6).

Bayesian MCMC analysis of DENV-4

After downsizing of the sequences in the phylogenetic tree and achieving a sufficient temporal signal in TempEst (R 2 = 0.32), the dataset of DENV-4 sequences (including 2 study strains) (n = 134) was selected for molecular clock analysis (Supplementary Figure S4C). The nucleotide substitution for the resulting dataset was selected as GTR + G (with gamma-distributed rate variation among sites, four categories). Strict clock and Bayesian skyline were estimated as the best-fit models for DENV-4 strains in our analysis (Table 1). The maximum clade credibility tree was constructed using the best-fit model as shown in Figure 7 (Supplementary Figure S7).

Figure 7. Maximum clade credibility tree of DENV-4 (n = 134). The tree was generated with the best-fit strict clock, Bayesian skyline model. Node ages are denoted at each node. The arrows are used to provide more clarity to the illustration.

The mean evolutionary rate was estimated to be 6.23 × 10−4 substitutions/site/year (95% HPD (4.64 × 10−4–7.89 × 10−4 s/s/y)). The tMRCA of the tree root of all the genotypes of DENV-4 (I, II, III, IV, V, and VI) was estimated approximately as 181 years (95% HPD (133–238 years)), 1840 (95% HPD (1784–1889)). The mean age of divergence between genotype II and genotype VI is about 76 years. The analysis showed that genotype III, which included the Thailand sequences, evolved around 111 years (95% HPD (87–140 years)) ago. The date estimation showed that genotype I was introduced around 78 years ago (95% HPD (65–94 years)), that is in 1943. The age of the study sequences was found to be about 6 years old (95% HPD (3–10 years)).

The results obtained from the molecular clock analyses of the three serotypes are summarised in Table 2.

Table 2. Summary table of the molecular clock analysis using Bayesian MCMC approach

Bayesian skyline plots

On exploring the demographic history of the sampled population of DENV-1 (Indian strains n = 41, 1956–2019) using the Bayesian skyline plot, a constant pattern of population size was observed from 1956 to 2006 (Figure 8a). The virus population started decreasing around 2006 and reached a noticeable decline level around 2010. After 2010, the population size showed a high rise but it started declining soon around 2015. Unlike DENV-1, the population size of DENV-3 in India (Indian strains n = 48, 1966–2019) started increasing around 2006 and showed a significant decline around 2014–2015 (Figure 8b). The population of DENV-4 (Indian strains n = 23, 1961–2019) also started increasing around 2006. However, a significant rise was observed between 2010 and 2015 (Figure 8c).

Figure 8. Bayesian skyline plots of Indian strains. (a) DENV-1 (n = 41), (b) DENV-3 (n = 48), and (c) DENV-4 (n = 23). X-axis – time, Y-axis – Neτ. The blue solid line is the median estimate of Neτ. The blue-shaded area represents 95% HPD.

Median-joining network

The median-joining network of DENV-1 strains (n = 240) highlights the predominance of genotype V and genotype I of DENV-1 globally. It showed the emergence of two major haplotypes H19 and H101 of genotype V into two distinct lineages of Asian and American viral strains, respectively (Figure 9a). Most of the Indian strains including our study strains got clustered with H19, indicating closer relatedness of the Indian sequences with the Asian lineage of genotype V.

Figure 9. The median-joining network. (a) DENV-1, (b) DENV-3, (c) DENV-4, and (d) Countries colour-coding. The network of each serotype shows the genotypic relationships within a serotype and the pattern of clustering in each genotype. The size of the circle represents the clustering of the identical sequences collected from different geographical regions across the globe. The length of the lines does not represent any proportionality to the mutational distances amongst the strains.

Similarly, the median-joining network of n = 374 sequences of DENV-3 showed evolutionary relationships in the four genotypes of DENV-3 (I, II, III, and V) (Figure 9b). The haplotype H16 from which other lineages of genotype II emerged was related to the haplotype H147 of genotype III. The nodes H75, H92, H34, H52, H56, H107, H32, and H105 of genotype III consisting of the sequences from Sri Lanka, Colombia, Argentina, Brazil, USA, India, and China are all interconnected progressively, suggesting sequential evolution of genotype III of DENV-3 from the origin. From these nodes, further minor haplotypes emerged into distinct lineages of genotype III. The study strains of DENV-3 haplotypes H2, H3, H4, H5, and H6 showed distinct branching points in the Asian lineage of genotype III.

Further, the evolution and expansion pattern of DENV-4 (n = 186) was also studied using median-joining network analysis. The DENV-4 network included all its six genotypes I, II, III, IV, V, and VI (Figure 9c). Genotype I represents the DENV-4 strains from Thailand, India, the Philippines, China, and Cambodia. The study isolates (H2, H3) along with the other Indian strains formed a distinct lineage in genotype I. Further, the figure also illustrates the emergence of two DENV-4 genotype II major lineages (H43 and H24) from the haplotype H104. The number of countries and their colour-coding utilised in the network analysis is given in Figure 9d.

Selection pressure analyses

The dataset DENV-1 (n = 170), DENV-3 (n = 190), and DENV-4 (n = 134) were subjected to selection pressure analyses for the identification of the sites in the CprM region that are prone to mutation. The low ratio of mean dN/dS obtained by SLAC suggested negative or purifying selection in the CprM region of DENV-1, DENV-3, and DENV-4 genomes. The four codon positions of DENV-1 were detected under positive selection: 14, 16, 86, and 100. The codon position 16 was positively selected by all the four nucleotide substitution methods that were employed for the analysis. Two codon positions of DENV-3 were detected under positive selection: 19 and 79 with position 19 were positively selected by all the methods. Further, two codon positions were detected under the positive selection of DENV-4: 18 and 75. The codon position 18 was positively selected by all the above methods. The results obtained for the three DENV serotypes are summarised in Table 3.

Table 3. Selection pressure analyses of the CprM region of DENV-1, DENV-3, and DENV-4

The p-value threshold for SLAC, FEL, and MEME was set in the range of 0.05–0.25. The posterior probability in FUBAR was set to 0.7. The sites selected by at least two methods were considered positively selected and are bold in the table. Codon positive are DENV-1: 14, 16, 86, and 100; DENV-3: 19 and 79; DENV-4: 18 and 75. The codon positions correspond to the positions of the full-length protein sequences of the respective prototype strains of DENV-1, DENV-3, and DENV-4.

Shannon entropy analysis

The identification of the sites that are prone to mutation in the CprM region of the DENV genome was done by the entropy analysis using BioEdit (v.7.2) software for the datasets n = 170 (DENV-1), n = 190 (DENV-3), and n = 134 (DENV-4). For the selection of a variable site, a value of 0.2 was set as the threshold. The positions were mentioned with respect to the full-length protein sequences of the respective prototype strains of the Dengue virus. Twelve sites were identified in DENV-1 having an entropy score of more than 0.2. The sites were: 26, 46, 70, 75, 90, 99, 100, 109, 112, 114, 129, and 143. Sites 26, 70, 90, and 109 possessed an entropy score of more than 0.5 (Figure 10a). Similarly, the sites identified in DENV-3 were 19, 35, 65, 82, 86, 97, 103, and 108, amongst which 35, 97, and 108 possessed scores greater than 0.5 (Figure 10b). The analysis in the DENV-4 dataset also showed eight variable sites 18, 34, 49, 81, 96, 98, 102, and 111. The entropy score > 0.5 goes to the codon position 81, 96, 98, 102, and 111 in this conserved region of the DENV-4 genome (Figure 10c).

Figure 10. Shannon entropy plot of CprM region of Dengue virus. (a) DENV-1, (b) DENV-3, and (c) DENV-4.

Discussion

The phenomena of genetic changes in the DENV genome have profoundly affected the epidemiology and virulence of Dengue infection worldwide [Reference Rico-Hesse18Reference Hwang, Kim, Chung, Oh, Park, Hur, Hong and Koo20]. These genetic changes are crucial in tracing the origin of the disease, which is carried out principally through the evolutionary analyses of genome sequences [Reference Holmes and Twiddy21]. In the past, these analyses have elucidated several important features of DENV such as rates and constraints of evolution, viral population sizes, selection pressures, and putative recombination [Reference Weaver and Vasilakis22]. To get better insights into the epidemic pattern of the disease, consistent monitoring in a given population is crucial, aiding in the prevention of this impending threat [Reference Koo, Nasir, Hapuarachchi, Lee, Hasan, Ng and Khan23]. In this study, we have performed partial CprM gene sequence–based global phylogenetic, Bayesian MCMC, median-joining network, selection pressure, and entropy analyses. We have analysed global DENV-1, DENV-3, and DENV-4 strains, including the strains identified in our study during 2017–2018.

DENV-1 has six genotypes; Asia (I), Thailand (II), Malaysia (III), South Pacific (IV), American/African (V), and sylvatic (VI) [Reference Patil, Cherian, Walimbe, Patil, Sathe, Shah and Cecilia24, Reference Pyke, Moore, Taylor, Hall-Mendelin, Cameron, Hewitson, Pukallus, Huang, Warrilow and van den Hurk25]. The phylogenetic analysis of DENV-1 showed clustering of the identified strains in genotype V with the previously recognised strains from India. The American-African genotype (V) of DENV-1 has been in circulation since the 1940s in India; however, the existence of the Asian genotype of DENV-1 was also reported from India in very earlier viral isolates from 1997–1998 [Reference Gupta, Srivastava, Jain and Chaturvedi6]. Interestingly, another report from India had also detected the predominance of the Asian genotype (genotype I) as the cause of an epidemic in the southern part of the country in 2012 [Reference Cecilia, Patil, Kakade, Walimbe, Alagarasu, Anukumar and Abraham26]. Though the Asian genotype was the cause of major outbreaks in the previous years, the clustering pattern in the phylogenetic tree of DENV-1 including our study suggested a more diverse spread of genotype V globally, particularly in the Americas and in India as well [Reference Ocazionez-Jiménez, Ortiz-Báez, Gómez-Rangel and Miranda-Esquivel27Reference Shrivastava, Tiraki, Diwan, Lalwani, Modak, Mishra and Arankalle30].

In the CprM phylogeny of DENV-3, four genotypes (I, II, III, and V) have been identified to date. Sequences clustered in genotype IV were not recognised by CprM gene phylogeny and hence excluded from the analyses. The phylogenetic analysis of DENV-3 revealed the clustering of the study strains into genotype III along with the sequences from China, Pakistan, and India. The clustering of study strains into different clades suggested the microevolution of DENV-3 in India during 2017–2018. This genotype of DENV-3 is under continued persistence for decades in New Delhi, India [Reference Chakravarti, Arora and Luxemburger8, Reference Parveen, Islam, Tazeen, Hisamuddin, Abdullah, Naqvi, Faizan, Gulyani, Ahmed and Parveen15, Reference Kukreti, Mittal, Chaudhary, Rautela, Kumar, Chauhan, Bhat, Chhabra, Bhattacharya, Pasha, Kumar, Gomber, Lal and Rai31, Reference Afreen, Naqvi, Broor, Ahmed and Parveen32]. The predominance of genotype III of DENV-3 was also reported from other geographical locations in India [Reference Patil, Alagarasu, Kakade, More, Gadekar, Jadhav, Parashar and Shah33, Reference Rajesh, Alagarasu, Patil, Bharathi, More, Kakade, Veronika, Jothilakshmi and Shah34]. The genotype III of DENV-3 has also spread its tentacles globally, like in Sudan, Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, and other regions of the world [Reference Eldigail, Abubaker, Khalid, Abdallah, Musa, Ahmed, Adam, Elbashir and Aradaib35Reference Hashem, Sohrab, El-Kafrawy, Abd-Alla, El-Ela, Abujamel, Hassan, Farraj, Othman, Charrel and Azhar37]. This suggested a consistent predominance of DENV-3 circulation by genotype III globally and in India as well.

Similarly, we have phylogenetically analysed the DENV-4 study strains identified in 2018. The DENV-4 study strains were grouped into genotype I along with other Indian strains. The DENV-4 genotype classification for the current study was done according to the article published in 2016 [Reference Shrivastava, Tiraki, Diwan, Lalwani, Modak, Mishra and Arankalle30]. A similar report has shown the prevalence of genotype I of DENV-4 in 2016 in Pune, India. The isolates from genotype VI known as genotype IIa elsewhere may have arisen due to intra-serotypic recombination amongst independent ancestral lineages of DENV-4 [Reference Shrivastava, Tiraki, Diwan, Lalwani, Modak, Mishra and Arankalle30, Reference AbuBakar, Wong and Chan38]. Some earlier and recent reports from India have also reported the occurrence of genotype I of DENV-4 [Reference Cecilia, Kakade, Bhagat, Vallentyne, Singh, Patil, Todkar, Varghese and Shah39, Reference Sharmila, Vanathy, Rajamani, Kaliaperumal and Dhodapkar40]. This genotype was also reported earlier in many other Asian countries like Cambodia, Malaysia, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Vietnam [Reference Dash, Sharma, Srivastava, Santhosh, Parida, Neeraja, Subbalaxmi, Lakshmi and Rao41]. However, the prevalence of genotype II of DENV-4 was also identified in different parts of the world [Reference Villabona-Arenas and de Andrade Zanotto42Reference Hamel, Surasombatpattana, Wichit, Dauvé, Donato, Pompon, Vijaykrishna, Liegeois, Vargas, Luplertlop and Missé44].

To determine the time-scale and evolutionary relationships of DENV, the Bayesian MCMC approach was performed using software implemented in the BEAST package [Reference Drummond and Rambaut45]. The mean value of the evolutionary rates of DENV-1, DENV-3, and DENV-4 was estimated to be 5.99 × 10−4 substitutions/site/year (s/s/y), 7.90 × 10−4 s/s/y, and 6.23 × 10−4 s/s/y respectively. This suggested a faster rate of evolution and the existence of more recent evolutionary events in DENV-3 followed by DENV-4 and then DENV-1. Our rate estimates are similar to the previous reports published earlier on the basis of E gene phylogeny 5.58 × 10−4 s/s/y for DENV-1, 7.64 × 10−4 s/s/y for DENV-3, and, 6.72 × 10−4 s/s/y for DENV-4 [Reference Hwang, Kim, Chung, Oh, Park, Hur, Hong and Koo20, Reference Afreen, Naqvi, Broor, Ahmed and Parveen32]. The tMRCA of DENV-1 was ≈314 years, which was similar to that reported by Pyke et al. (315 years) [Reference Pyke, Moore, Taylor, Hall-Mendelin, Cameron, Hewitson, Pukallus, Huang, Warrilow and van den Hurk25]. The prior estimate of tMRCA of DENV-1 before the assignment of genotype VI was estimated to be within the confidence limit of 89.17–170.28 years [Reference Twiddy, Holmes and Rambaut46]. This explained the highly divergent characteristic feature of the Brun2014 strain (genotype VI) [Reference Pyke, Moore, Taylor, Hall-Mendelin, Cameron, Hewitson, Pukallus, Huang, Warrilow and van den Hurk25]. The tMRCA of the four genotypes of DENV-3 (I, II, III, and V) was estimated to be around 86 years old, which is comparable to the earlier estimates for this serotype (≈95 years) [Reference Afreen, Naqvi, Broor, Ahmed and Parveen32]. Similarly, the root age of DENV-4 was estimated to be 181 years old, indicating the existence of DENV-4 in around 1840. These estimates are comparable to the confidence limit described in earlier reports of DENV-4 (152.25–264.80 years) [Reference Twiddy, Holmes and Rambaut46]. Further, the tMRCA of the prevalent genotypes V (77 years), III (60 years), and I (78 years) of DENV-1, DENV-3, and DENV-4 was found comparable to the estimates reported earlier, that is, 73, 63, and 84 years, respectively [Reference Hwang, Kim, Chung, Oh, Park, Hur, Hong and Koo20, Reference Pyke, Moore, Taylor, Hall-Mendelin, Cameron, Hewitson, Pukallus, Huang, Warrilow and van den Hurk25, Reference Afreen, Naqvi, Broor, Ahmed and Parveen32, Reference Patil, Cherian, Walimbe, Bhagat, Vallentyne, Kakade, Shah and Cecilia47]. This suggested more recent evolutionary changes in consistently predominating genotype III of DENV-3 in contrast to the other prevalent genotypes of the co-circulating serotypes.

Further, local evolutionary analyses were performed using Bayesian skyline plot methods to determine the population dynamics of DENV in reference to the circulation of the multiple serotypes in Indian settings. The Bayesian skyline plot of DENV-1 showed a decrease in population size in India from 2006 to 2010. A high rise after 2010 was observed, and, in the following years, the population size remained low. The decrease in the population size of DENV-1 during 2006 is in compliance with the predominance of DENV-3 during the 2006 outbreak in India [Reference Bharaj, Chahar, Pandey, Diddi, Dar, Guleria, Kabra and Broor48]. This rise was followed by a stationary phase, which represents the continuous circulation of DENV-3 at a constant rate. However, a decline in the population size was observed after 2010 in DENV-3. Further, the retrospective analysis of the DENV-4 Indian population revealed a decrease in the population size of DENV-4 after 1980, which implies its low level of detection and predominance by other serotypes in India [Reference Ganeshkumar, Murhekar, Poornima, Saravanakumar, Sukumaran, Anandaselvasankar, John and Mehendale5]. The rise in the population size of DENV-4 in the following year of 2007 is supported by the emergence of genotype I in Indian settings [Reference Ganeshkumar, Murhekar, Poornima, Saravanakumar, Sukumaran, Anandaselvasankar, John and Mehendale5, Reference Shrivastava, Tiraki, Diwan, Lalwani, Modak, Mishra and Arankalle30, Reference Dash, Sharma, Srivastava, Santhosh, Parida, Neeraja, Subbalaxmi, Lakshmi and Rao41].

The evolutionary events and genotypic relationships were further analysed by median-joining network analyses. It was observed that genotype I and genotype V were the predominant genotypes of DENV-1 worldwide; however, the two are established in distinct regions. Genotype V is mostly predominant in American and African regions, and in India from the Asian regions. The two major nodes in genotype V, H19 and H101, have shown extensive divergence into distinct branches; however, the Asian lineage was found relatively stable compared to the one in the Americas, which further implies the phenomenon of frequent lineage replacement in the Americas [Reference de Bruycker-Nogueira, Mir, Dos Santos and Bello49]. Furthermore, the phenomena of replacement of DENV-1 lineages were majorly detected across heavily sampled countries like India, Puerto Rico, Brazil, Nicaragua, and Venezuela; therefore, such interpretations required more caution and consistent reports from various parts of the world.

In the network of DENV-3 strains, the Latin American isolates shared a common node, H11, with the isolates from East Africa, which was identified in the 1984–1989 outbreak in Mozambique [Reference Gubler, Sather, Kuno and Cabral50]. The common ancestral node for Latin America and East Africa shares a common node with the isolates from Sri Lanka H75. This clustering pattern is supported by the earlier findings that suggested that Latin America is known to have its DENV-3 genotype III origins in East Africa due to the close relatedness amongst their identified isolates [Reference Messer, Gubler, Harris, Sivananthan and de Silva51], Further, DENV-3 exists in the Indian subcontinent since 1966 (haplotype H97), which indicates the introduction of genotype III from the Indian subcontinent into East Africa in or before 1984 [Reference Messer, Gubler, Harris, Sivananthan and de Silva51]. The network analysis further revealed distinct branching points for the study strains (H2, H3, H4, H5, and H6), which were identified in a span of just 2 years (2017–2018) in our investigation. This highlights the diverse nature of the nucleotide sequences of genotype III, in the Indian lineage of DENV-3.

The network of DENV-4 revealed the presence of a unique clade of Indian strains within genotype I. Isolates from India were found more closely related to the Sri Lankan isolate from 1978 (H123), suggesting it to be the progenitor of Indian viral strains [Reference Dash, Sharma, Srivastava, Santhosh, Parida, Neeraja, Subbalaxmi, Lakshmi and Rao41]. The presence of a single strain from Pakistan KF041260/Pakistan in the Indian clade of genotype I of DENV-4 in our network is supported by a previous report from Sri Lanka, which suggested that the virus spread to India and/or Pakistan before re-emerging in Sri Lanka in 2009 [Reference Uehara, Tissera, Bodinayake, Amarasinghe, Nagahawatte, Tillekeratne, Cui, Reller, Palihawadana, Gunasena, Desilva, Wilder-Smith, Gubler, Woods and Sessions52]. Of the two lineages that emerged from H104, one of them (H43) caused the spread of the virus to various geographical regions like Colombia, Puerto Rico, etc., whereas the second lineage (H24) predominantly established itself in Brazil and was also the cause of the Dengue outbreak in the country during 2012–2013 [Reference Ortiz-Baez, MDP, Vedovello, Colombo, Nogueira, Villabona-Arenas and Zanotto53].

In context to the selection pressure exerted over DENV-1, DENV-3, and DENV-4, a low value of mean dN/dS suggested strong purifying selection in the CprM region of the DENV genome owing to its conserved nature. Negative or purifying selection in the CprM region of the Dengue virus was also observed in earlier reports from India; however, some of the codon positions under positive selection were also detected [Reference Parveen, Islam, Tazeen, Hisamuddin, Abdullah, Naqvi, Faizan, Gulyani, Ahmed and Parveen15, Reference Bedi, Prasad, Mathur and Bhatnagar54]. Although many sites were also identified in our study by selection pressure and entropy analyses individually, there are few detected which were selected by both methods. The codon position 100 with substitution R100K (basic polar to basic polar) was identified as positively selected with an entropy score of 0.24 in DENV-1. Similarly, a single codon position 19 with the substitution V19A (neutral non-polar to neutral non-polar) was selected by both selection pressure and entropy analyses (entropy score 0.45) in DENV-3. Further, a single codon position with substitution E18A (acidic polar to neutral non-polar) was also selected positively in DENV-4. This site also showed an entropy score (0.25) more than the threshold (0.2). All of these mutations were also identified in the sequences from earlier investigations [Reference Ocwieja, Fernando, Sherrill-Mix, Sundararaman, Tennekoon, Tippalagama, Krishnananthasivam, Premawansa, Premawansa and De Silva55Reference Villabona-Arenas, de Oliveira, Capra Cde, Balarini, Loureiro, Fonseca, Passos and Zanotto57]. These findings indicate that only in DENV-4, the mutation has caused a change in the polarity of the protein. However, the role of these mutations needs to be implicated in future studies with evolutionary analyses on a larger scale.

Phylogenetic analysis on the basis of the CprM gene region has shown to have some advantages. The region employs a single pair of primers for the amplification and sequencing of any of the four serotypes of DENV. Thus, it is more economical than E gene sequencing. Also, many previous studies have reported that the CprM gene junction can function as a tool in genotyping Dengue viruses [Reference Shrivastava, Tiraki, Diwan, Lalwani, Modak, Mishra and Arankalle30, Reference Eldigail, Abubaker, Khalid, Abdallah, Musa, Ahmed, Adam, Elbashir and Aradaib35]. Moreover, in our study, the molecular clock estimates, that is, the tMRCA and nucleotide substitution rates, were found comparable to that of previous reports based on E gene phylogeny.

On the basis of the CprM phylogeny, we were able to decipher the various evolutionary aspects of the Dengue virus from across the globe. Though earlier studies have reported occasional outbreaks due to genotype shifts in DENV-1 (genotype V to I) [Reference Cecilia, Patil, Kakade, Walimbe, Alagarasu, Anukumar and Abraham26, Reference Kumar, Anish, Valamparampil, Thomas, Abidha, Mathew, Ajithlal and Jambulingam58] and DENV-4 (genotype I to II) [Reference Jing, Yang, Luo, Xiao, Di, He, Fu, Wang and Lu59, Reference Aryati, Wrahatnala, Yohan, Fanny, Hakim, Sunari, Zuroidah, Wardhani, Santoso, Husada, Rohman, Tarmizi, JTO and Sasmono60], the prevalence and diverse nature of genotypes V and I of DENV-1 and DENV-4, respectively, remained consistent worldwide and in India as well, as highlighted in the present study by phylogenetic and network analyses. Such occurrence of outbreaks due to genotype shifts and the introduction of newly divergent strains (genotype VI in DENV-1 [Reference Pyke, Moore, Taylor, Hall-Mendelin, Cameron, Hewitson, Pukallus, Huang, Warrilow and van den Hurk25]) highlights that the emergence of the Dengue virus remains an ongoing threat. This proves that our understanding of DENV evolution is not yet extensive and its diversity to date remained uncharacterised. Nonetheless, the implication of prevalent genotypes in major Dengue epidemics and their continued persistence has the potential to cause Dengue pandemics worldwide in the future. Moreover, the faster rate of nucleotide substitution of DENV-3 compared to the other serotype warrants continued surveillance to screen the intrusions caused by the emerging serotype of DENV, so that effective and well-timed control strategies can be established to combat the future impending threat of this virus.

The main limitation of our study was that we have collected the samples from a local health centre of the university. Future studies on larger patient groups from different referral hospitals in different geographical regions are needed to elucidate the evolutionary trajectories of the Dengue virus. Such an effort of elaborate hospital and community-based surveillance from endemic regions is likely to describe the true disease burden caused by this emerging viral pathogen.

Conclusions

The present study showed the predominant circulation of genotypes V, III, and I of DENV-1, DENV-3, and DENV-4, respectively in India and in various other parts of the world.

The CprM gene-based substitution rates and tMRCA were found comparable to the estimates of the previous studies based on E gene phylogeny. Microevolution was observed in the three serotypes in recent years; however, the study highlights the faster rate of evolution in DENV-3 compared to DENV-1 and DENV-4. Purifying selection is the driving force of evolution on the CprM gene of DENV. Genotypic and serotypic variations may lead to the emergence of new viral strains which may further lead to local evolution in new areas and may cause massive outbreaks. Hence, information concerning the genotypic composition of the circulating serotype would be beneficial in controlling the future risk imposed by the emerging viral strains of the Dengue virus.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268823000924.

Data availability statement

All materials needed to replicate the findings of the article are available as Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgements

A.I. is supported by a Senior Research fellowship of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Government of India. Proposal No. VIR/Fellowship/4/2018-ECD-I.

Author contribution

Resources: E.G., B.T., M.A., I.H.N., R.D.; Funding acquisition: A.A., F.N.A., T.H.; Writing – review & editing: A.A., A.I., F.D., F.N.A., T.H., S.P.; Conceptualization: A.I.; Data curation: A.I.; Formal analysis: A.I.; Investigation: A.I.; Methodology: A.I., F.D.; Software: A.I.; Supervision: A.I., S.P.; Validation: A.I., S.P.; Visualization: A.I.; Writing – original draft: A.I.

Funding statement

This research work in our laboratory is supported by grants funded by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India (37(1697)17/EMR-II), and the Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine, India (F.No.3-63/2019-CCRUM/Tech). The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, “Ministry of Education” in Saudi Arabia for funding this research (IFKSUOR3-427-1).

Competing interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

The study was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee, Jamia Millia Islamia. Proposal no. 16/9/149/JMI/IEC/2017.

References

Bhatt, S, Gething, PW, Brady, OJ, Messina, JP, Farlow, AW, Moyes, CL, Drake, JM, Brownstein, JS, Hoen, AG, Sankoh, O, Myers, MF, George, DB, Jaenisch, T, Wint, GR, Simmons, CP, Scott, TW, Farrar, JJ and Hay, SI (2013) The global distribution and burden of Dengue. Nature 496(7446), 504507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalayanarooj, S (2011) Clinical manifestations and management of dengue/DHF/DSS. Tropical Medicine and Health 39(4 Supplement), S83S87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El Sahili, A and Lescar, J (2017) Dengue virus non-structural protein 5. Viruses 9(4), 91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, C, Zhou, Z, Wen, Z, Liu, Y, Zeng, C, Xiao, D, Ou, M, Han, Y, Huang, S, Liu, D, Ye, X, Zou, X, Wu, J, Wang, H, Zeng, EY, Jing, C and Yang, G (2017) Global epidemiology of dengue outbreaks in 1990–2015: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 7, 317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ganeshkumar, P, Murhekar, MV, Poornima, V, Saravanakumar, V, Sukumaran, K, Anandaselvasankar, A, John, D and Mehendale, SM (2018) Dengue infection in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 12(7), e0006618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, N, Srivastava, S, Jain, A and Chaturvedi, UC (2012) Dengue in india. The Indian Journal of Medical Research 136(3), 373.Google ScholarPubMed
Kukreti, H, Dash, PK, Parida, M, Chaudhary, A, Saxena, P, Rautela, RS, Mittal, V, Chhabra, M, Bhattacharya, D, Lal, S, Rao, PV and Rai, A (2009) Phylogenetic studies reveal existence of multiple lineages of a single genotype of DENV-1 (genotype III) in India during 1956–2007. Virology Journal 6(1), 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chakravarti, A, Arora, R and Luxemburger, C (2012) Fifty years of dengue in India. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 106(5), 273282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Islam, A, Abdullah, M, Tazeen, A, Naqvi, IH, Kazim, SN, Ahmed, A, Alamery, SF, Malik, A and Parveen, S (2020) Circulation of dengue virus serotypes in hyperendemic region of New Delhi, India during 2011–2017. Journal of Infection and Public Health 13(12), 19121919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Islam, A, Abdullah, M, Tazeen, A, Afreen, N, Deeba, F, Hussain Naqvi, I, Kazim, SN, Broor, S, Ahmed, A and Parveen, S (2016) Detection of all the four serotypes of Dengue virus in New Delhi, India during post monsoon season of 2015. Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Care 3(1), 2429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanciotti, RS, Calisher, CH, Gubler, DJ, Chang, GJ and Vorndam, AV (1992) Rapid detection and typing of dengue viruses from clinical samples by using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 30(3), 545551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamura, K, Stecher, G, Peterson, D, Filipski, A and Kumar, S (2013) Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(12), 27252729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, MA, Pfeiffer, W and Schwartz, T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE). New Orleans, LA: IEEE, pp. 18.Google Scholar
King, CC, Chao, DY, Chien, LJ, Chang, GJ, Lin, TH, Wu, YC and Huang, JH (2008) Comparative analysis of full genomic sequences among different genotypes of dengue virus type 3. Virology Journal 5, 113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parveen, N, Islam, A, Tazeen, A, Hisamuddin, M, Abdullah, M, Naqvi, IH, Faizan, MI, Gulyani, D, Ahmed, A and Parveen, S (2019) Circulation of single serotype of Dengue Virus (DENV-3) in New Delhi, India during 2016: A change in the epidemiological trend. Journal of Infection and Public Health 12(1), 4956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calderón-Arguedas, O, Troyo, A, Moreira-Soto, RD, Marín, R and Taylor, L (2015) Dengue viruses in Aedes albopictus Skuse from a pineapple plantation in Costa Rica. Journal of Vector Ecology 40(1), 184186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sasmono, RT, Wahid, I, Trimarsanto, H, Yohan, B, Wahyuni, S, Hertanto, M, Yusuf, I, Mubin, H, Ganda, IJ, Latief, R, Bifani, PJ, Shi, PY and Schreiber, MJ (2015) Genomic analysis and growth characteristic of dengue viruses from Makassar, Indonesia. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 32, 165177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rico-Hesse, R (2003) Microevolution and virulence of dengue viruses. Advances in Virus Research 59, 315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katzelnick, LC, Coello Escoto, A, Huang, AT, Garcia-Carreras, B, Chowdhury, N, Maljkovic Berry, I, Chavez, C, Buchy, P, Duong, V, Dussart, P, Gromowski, G, Macareo, L, Thaisomboonsuk, B, Fernandez, S, Smith, DJ, Jarman, R, Whitehead, SS, Salje, H and Cummings, DAT (2021) Antigenic evolution of dengue viruses over 20 years. Science 374(6570), 9991004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hwang, EH, Kim, G, Chung, H, Oh, H, Park, JH, Hur, GH, Hong, J and Koo, BS (2021) Molecular evolution of dengue virus types 1 and 4 in Korean travelers. Archives of Virology 166, 11031112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, EC and Twiddy, SS (2003) The origin, emergence and evolutionary genetics of dengue virus. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 3(1), 1928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weaver, SC and Vasilakis, N (2009) Molecular evolution of dengue viruses: Contributions of phylogenetics to understanding the history and epidemiology of the preeminent arboviral disease. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 9(4), 523540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koo, C, Nasir, A, Hapuarachchi, HC, Lee, KS, Hasan, Z, Ng, LC and Khan, E (2013) Evolution and heterogeneity of multiple serotypes of Dengue virus in Pakistan, 2006–2011. Virology Journal 10, 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patil, JA, Cherian, S, Walimbe, AM, Patil, BR, Sathe, PS, Shah, PS and Cecilia, D (2011) Evolutionary dynamics of the American African genotype of dengue type 1 virus in India (1962–2005). Infection, Genetics and Evolution 11(6), 14431448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pyke, AT, Moore, PR, Taylor, CT, Hall-Mendelin, S, Cameron, JN, Hewitson, GR, Pukallus, DS, Huang, B, Warrilow, D and van den Hurk, AF (2016) Highly divergent dengue virus type 1 genotype sets a new distance record. Scientific Reports 6(1), 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cecilia, D, Patil, JA, Kakade, MB, Walimbe, A, Alagarasu, K, Anukumar, B and Abraham, A (2017) Emergence of the Asian genotype of DENV-1 in South India. Virology 510, 4045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ocazionez-Jiménez, RE, Ortiz-Báez, AS, Gómez-Rangel, SY and Miranda-Esquivel, DR (2013) Dengue virus serotype 1 (DENV-1) from Colombia: Its contribution to dengue occurrence in Santander. Biomedica 33, 2230.Google ScholarPubMed
Ribeiro, GO, Gill, DE, Ribeiro, ESD, FJC, Monteiro, Morais, VS, Marcatti, R, MODS, Rego, ELL, Araújo, Witkin, SS, Villanova, F, Deng, X, Sabino, EC, Delwart, E, Leal, É and da Costa, AC (2021) Adaptive evolution of new variants of Dengue virus serotype 1 genotype V circulating in the Brazilian Amazon. Viruses 13(4), 689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dash, PK, Sharma, S, Soni, M, Agarwal, A, Sahni, AK and Parida, M (2015) Complete genome sequencing and evolutionary phylogeography analysis of Indian isolates of Dengue virus type 1. Virus Research 195, 124134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shrivastava, S, Tiraki, D, Diwan, A, Lalwani, SK, Modak, M, Mishra, AC and Arankalle, VA (2018) Co-circulation of all the four dengue virus serotypes and detection of a novel clade of DENV-4 (genotype I) virus in Pune, India during 2016 season. PLoS One 13(2), e0192672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kukreti, H, Mittal, V, Chaudhary, A, Rautela, RS, Kumar, M, Chauhan, S, Bhat, S, Chhabra, M, Bhattacharya, D, Pasha, ST, Kumar, D, Gomber, S, Lal, S and Rai, A (2010) Continued persistence of a single genotype of dengue virus type-3 (DENV-3) in Delhi, India since its re-emergence over the last decade. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection 43(1), 5361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Afreen, N, Naqvi, IH, Broor, S, Ahmed, A and Parveen, S (2015) Phylogenetic and molecular clock analysis of dengue serotype 1 and 3 from New Delhi, India. PLoS One 10(11), e0141628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patil, JA, Alagarasu, K, Kakade, MB, More, AM, Gadekar, KA, Jadhav, SM, Parashar, D and Shah, PS (2018) Emergence of dengue virus type 1 and type 3 as dominant serotypes during 2017 in Pune and Nashik regions of Maharashtra, Western India. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 66, 272283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajesh, NT, Alagarasu, K, Patil, JA, Bharathi, E, More, A, Kakade, MB, Veronika, M, Jothilakshmi, K and Shah, PS (2020). Serotype-specific differences in the laboratory parameters among hospitalized children with dengue and genetic diversity of dengue viruses circulating in Tamil Nadu, India during 2017. Journal of Medical Virology 92(8), 10131022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldigail, MH, Abubaker, HA, Khalid, FA, Abdallah, TM, Musa, HH, Ahmed, ME, Adam, GK, Elbashir, MI and Aradaib, IE (2020) Association of genotype III of dengue virus serotype 3 with disease outbreak in Eastern Sudan, 2019. Virology Journal 17(1), 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramírez, A, Fajardo, A, Moros, Z, Gerder, M, Caraballo, G, Camacho, D, Comach, G, Alarcón, V, Zambrano, J, Hernández, R, Moratorio, G, Cristina, J and Liprandi, F (2010) Evolution of dengue virus type 3 genotype III in Venezuela: Diversification, rates and population dynamics. Virology Journal 7, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hashem, AM, Sohrab, SS, El-Kafrawy, SA, Abd-Alla, AMM, El-Ela, SA, Abujamel, TS, Hassan, AM, Farraj, SA, Othman, NA, Charrel, RN and Azhar, EI (2018) Diversity of dengue virus-3 genotype III in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Acta Tropica 183, 114118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
AbuBakar, S, Wong, P-F and Chan, Y-F (2002) Emergence of dengue virus type 4 genotype IIA in Malaysia. Journal of General Virology 83(10), 24372442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cecilia, D, Kakade, MB, Bhagat, AB, Vallentyne, J, Singh, A, Patil, JA, Todkar, SM, Varghese, SB and Shah, PS (2011) Detection of dengue-4 virus in Pune, Western India after an absence of 30 years-its association with two severe cases. Virology Journal 8, 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharmila, PF, Vanathy, K, Rajamani, B, Kaliaperumal, V and Dhodapkar, R (2019) Emergence of dengue virus 4 as the predominant serotype during the outbreak of 2017 in South India. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology 37(3), 393401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dash, PK, Sharma, S, Srivastava, A, Santhosh, SR, Parida, MM, Neeraja, M, Subbalaxmi, MV, Lakshmi, V and Rao, PV (2011) Emergence of dengue virus type 4 (genotype I) in India. Epidemiology & Infection 139(6), 857861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villabona-Arenas, CJ and de Andrade Zanotto, PM (2011) Evolutionary history of Dengue virus type 4: insights into genotype phylodynamics. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 11(5), 878885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vicente, CR, Pannuti, CS, Urbano, PR, Felix, AC, Cerutti Junior, C, Herbinger, KH, Fröschl, G and Romano, CM (2018) First phylogenetic analysis of dengue virus serotype 4 circulating in Espírito Santo state, Brazil, in 2013 and 2014. Epidemiology & Infection 146(1), 100106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamel, R, Surasombatpattana, P, Wichit, S, Dauvé, A, Donato, C, Pompon, J, Vijaykrishna, D, Liegeois, F, Vargas, RM, Luplertlop, N and Missé, D (2019) Phylogenetic analysis revealed the co-circulation of four dengue virus serotypes in Southern Thailand. PLoS One 14(8), e0221179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drummond, AJ and Rambaut, A (2007) BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7(1), 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Twiddy, SS, Holmes, EC and Rambaut, A (2003) Inferring the rate and time-scale of dengue virus evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20(1), 122129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patil, JA, Cherian, S, Walimbe, AM, Bhagat, A, Vallentyne, J, Kakade, M, Shah, PS and Cecilia, D (2012) Influence of evolutionary events on the Indian subcontinent on the phylogeography of dengue type 3 and 4 viruses. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 12(8), 17591769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bharaj, P, Chahar, HS, Pandey, A, Diddi, K, Dar, L, Guleria, R, Kabra, SK and Broor, S (2008) Concurrent infections by all four dengue virus serotypes during an outbreak of dengue in 2006 in Delhi, India. Virology Journal 5, 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Bruycker-Nogueira, F, Mir, D, Dos Santos, FB and Bello, G (2016) Evolutionary history and spatiotemporal dynamics of DENV-1 genotype V in the Americas. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 45, 454460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gubler, DJ, Sather, GE, Kuno, G and Cabral, JR (1986) Dengue 3 virus transmission in Africa. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 35(6), 12801284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messer, WB, Gubler, DJ, Harris, E, Sivananthan, K and de Silva, AM (2003) Emergence and global spread of a dengue serotype 3, subtype III virus. Emerging Infectious Diseases 9(7), 800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uehara, A, Tissera, HA, Bodinayake, CK, Amarasinghe, A, Nagahawatte, A, Tillekeratne, LG, Cui, J, Reller, ME, Palihawadana, P, Gunasena, S, Desilva, AD, Wilder-Smith, A, Gubler, DJ, Woods, CW and Sessions, OM (2017) Analysis of dengue serotype 4 in Sri Lanka during the 2012–2013 Dengue Epidemic. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 97(1), 130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortiz-Baez, AS, MDP, Cunha, Vedovello, D, Colombo, TE, Nogueira, ML, Villabona-Arenas, CJ and Zanotto, PMA (2019) Origin, tempo, and mode of the spread of DENV-4 Genotype IIB across the state of São Paulo, Brazil during the 2012-2013 outbreak. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 114, e180251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedi, SK, Prasad, A, Mathur, K and Bhatnagar, S (2013) Positive selection and evolution of dengue type-3 virus in the Indian subcontinent. Journal of Vector Borne Diseases 50(3), 188.Google ScholarPubMed
Ocwieja, KE, Fernando, AN, Sherrill-Mix, S, Sundararaman, SA, Tennekoon, RN, Tippalagama, R, Krishnananthasivam, S, Premawansa, G, Premawansa, S and De Silva, AD (2014) Phylogeography and molecular epidemiology of an epidemic strain of dengue virus type 1 in Sri Lanka. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 91(2), 225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hisamuddin, M, Tazeen, A, Abdullah, M, Islamuddin, M, Parveen, N, Islam, A, Faizan, MI, Hamza, A, Naqvi, IH, Verma, HN, Malik, A, Ahmed, A and Parveen, S (2018) Co-circulation of Chikungunya and Dengue viruses in Dengue endemic region of New Delhi, India during 2016. Epidemiology & Infection 146(13), 16421653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villabona-Arenas, CJ, de Oliveira, JL, Capra Cde, S, Balarini, K, Loureiro, M, Fonseca, CR, Passos, SD and Zanotto, PM (2014) Detection of four dengue serotypes suggests rise in hyperendemicity in urban centers of Brazil. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 8(2), e2620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, NP, Anish, TS, Valamparampil, MJ, Thomas, AT, Abidha, S, Mathew, J, Ajithlal, PM and Jambulingam, P (2019) Genotype shift of dengue virus (DENV1) during the 2017 outbreak of dengue fever in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 57, 961966.Google Scholar
Jing, QL, Yang, ZC, Luo, L, Xiao, XC, Di, B, He, P, Fu, CX, Wang, M and Lu, JH (2012) Emergence of dengue virus 4 genotype II in Guangzhou, China, 2010: Survey and molecular epidemiology of one community outbreak. BMC Infectious Diseases 12, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aryati, A, Wrahatnala, BJ, Yohan, B, Fanny, M, Hakim, FKN, Sunari, EP, Zuroidah, N, Wardhani, P, Santoso, MS, Husada, D, Rohman, A, Tarmizi, SN, JTO, Sievers and Sasmono, RT (2020) Dengue virus serotype 4 is responsible for the outbreak of dengue in East Java City of Jember, Indonesia. Viruses 12(9), 913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Overview of the study. The figure illustrates the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the sample collection, serotype detection during 2017 and 2018, and the numeric details of the sequences utilised in evolutionary analysis.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of DENV-1 (n = 240). The tree was generated using the maximum likelihood approach using partial CprM gene sequences of DENV-1. The study sequences clustered in genotype V are highlighted in black with the symbol ▲. The arrows are used to provide more clarity to the illustration. The sequences used in the tree are shown by their accession number followed by country and the date of collection.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of DENV-3 (n = 374). The tree was generated using the maximum likelihood approach using partial CprM gene sequences of DENV-3. The study sequences clustered in genotype III are highlighted in black with the symbol ▲. The sequences of other genotypes were collapsed as arrows for better illustration. The sequences used in the tree are shown by their accession number followed by country and the date of collection.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of DENV-4 (n = 186). The tree was generated using the maximum likelihood approach using partial CprM gene sequences of DENV-4. The study sequences clustered in genotype I are highlighted in black with the symbol ▲. The arrows are used to provide more clarity to the illustration. The sequences used in the tree are shown by their accession number followed by country and the date of collection.

Figure 4

Table 1. Log marginal likelihoods by path sampling and stepping-stone sampling for DENV-1, DENV-3, and DENV-4

Figure 5

Figure 5. Maximum clade credibility tree of DENV-1 (n = 170). The tree was generated with the best-fit strict clock, Bayesian skyline model. Node ages are denoted at each node. The arrows are used to provide more clarity to the illustration.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Maximum clade credibility tree of DENV-3 (n = 190). The tree was generated with the best-fit strict clock, exponential growth model. Node ages are denoted at each node. The arrows are used to provide more clarity to the illustration.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Maximum clade credibility tree of DENV-4 (n = 134). The tree was generated with the best-fit strict clock, Bayesian skyline model. Node ages are denoted at each node. The arrows are used to provide more clarity to the illustration.

Figure 8

Table 2. Summary table of the molecular clock analysis using Bayesian MCMC approach

Figure 9

Figure 8. Bayesian skyline plots of Indian strains. (a) DENV-1 (n = 41), (b) DENV-3 (n = 48), and (c) DENV-4 (n = 23). X-axis – time, Y-axis – Neτ. The blue solid line is the median estimate of Neτ. The blue-shaded area represents 95% HPD.

Figure 10

Figure 9. The median-joining network. (a) DENV-1, (b) DENV-3, (c) DENV-4, and (d) Countries colour-coding. The network of each serotype shows the genotypic relationships within a serotype and the pattern of clustering in each genotype. The size of the circle represents the clustering of the identical sequences collected from different geographical regions across the globe. The length of the lines does not represent any proportionality to the mutational distances amongst the strains.

Figure 11

Table 3. Selection pressure analyses of the CprM region of DENV-1, DENV-3, and DENV-4

Figure 12

Figure 10. Shannon entropy plot of CprM region of Dengue virus. (a) DENV-1, (b) DENV-3, and (c) DENV-4.

Supplementary material: File

Islam et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 124 KB
Supplementary material: File

Islam et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 1.5 MB