Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:40:42.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eye protection for preventing transmission of respiratory viral infections to healthcare workers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2018

Leonard A. Mermel*
Affiliation:
Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island Division of Infectious Diseases, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence Rhode Island Department of Epidemiology and Infection Control, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence Rhode Island
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Leonard Mermel, Division of Infectious Diseases, Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy Street Providence, RI 02903. E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Letter to the Editor
Copyright
© 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 

To the Editor—A review of ocular tropism of respiratory viruses concluded, “It is evident that numerous respiratory viruses, of both human and zoonotic origins, are capable of using the eye as both a site of virus replication as well as a portal of entry to mount a productive respiratory infection.”Reference Belser, Rota and Tumpey 1 This route of infection may occur when a respiratory virus contained in a droplet or smaller particle is deposited in the eye and the virus is introduced directly into respiratory tract via the nasolacrimal duct or after replication in the nasolacrimal sac, duct, and/or ocular tissues. Human and avian influenza viruses preferentially bind to alpha 2–3-linked and alpha 2–6-linked sialic acid receptors, respectively. Alpha 2–6-linked sialic acid receptors are predominant in the conjunctival and corneal epithelia, whereas the nasolacrimal system contains both alpha 2–3-linked and alpha 2–6-linked sialic acid receptors.Reference Belser, Rota and Tumpey 1 Once deposited on ocular tissue, proliferation of respiratory viruses is suppressed by various substances in human tears.Reference Creager, Kumar, Zeng, Maines, Tumpey and Belser 2

A classic article on RSV transmission noted, “Inoculation occurs mainly through the eye and nose.”Reference Hall 3 The same author subsequently recommended eye protection for prevention of RSV transmission but also stated that “gloves may be effective in the control of RSV because few persons will pick their noses or rub their eyes while gloved, and therefore the chance for self-inoculation is diminished.”Reference Hall 4 However, contamination of hands while removing PPE is well documented,Reference Tomas, Kundrapu and Thota 5 and this can lead to inoculation of the eyes. In addition, some strains of adenovirus can cause respiratory tract infection after ocular inoculationReference Darougar, Grey, Thaker and McSwiggan 6 ; rhinovirus can cause human infection when contaminated hands come in contact with the conjunctivaReference Reed 7 ; and pandemic H1N1 and avian influenza, but not H3N2, replicate effectively when inoculated in corneal tissue.Reference Creager, Kumar, Zeng, Maines, Tumpey and Belser 2

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance regarding droplet precautions states, “Use personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriately. Don mask upon entry into the patient room or patient space” (https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/basics/transmission-based-precautions.html). For standard precautions, the CDC guidance states, “Mask and goggles or a face shield… . Use during patient care activities likely to generate splashes or sprays of blood, body fluids, secretions, or excretions” (https://www.cdc.gov/HAI/prevent/ppe.html). However, healthcare workers may not interpret this statement as pertaining to patients that are coughing or sneezing. The 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Healthcare Settings states, “RSV transmission is effectively prevented by adherence to standard plus contact precautions and that for this virus routine use of goggles is not necessary.”Reference Siegel, Rhinehart, Jackson and Chiarello 8

Although rigorous investigation of ocular inoculation of respiratory viruses leading to respiratory tract infection is limited, based on the evidence to date, it would be prudent to wear eye protection when caring for patients with suspected or proven respiratory viral infection. This protocol would err on the side of caution in an attempt to mitigate the risk of transmission to healthcare workers and others. Such an approach would be in addition to source control in which infected patients wear masksReference Johnson, Druce, Birch and Grayson 9 as well as to contact and droplet precautions.Reference Rubin, Kohn, Nullet and Hill 10

Acknowledgments

Financial support

No financial support was provided relevant to this article.

Conflicts of interest

The author reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

1. Belser, JA, Rota, PA, Tumpey, TM. Ocular tropism of respiratory viruses. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2013;77:144156.Google Scholar
2. Creager, HM, Kumar, A, Zeng, H, Maines, TR, Tumpey, TM, Belser, JA. Infection and replication of influenza virus at the ocular surface. J Virol 2018;92. pii: e02192-217.Google Scholar
3. Hall, CB. Respiratory syncytial virus: its transmission in the hospital environment. Yale J Biol Med 1982;55:219223.Google Scholar
4. Hall, CB. Nosocomial respiratory syncytial virus infections: the “Cold War” has not ended. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31:590596.Google Scholar
5. Tomas, ME, Kundrapu, S, Thota, P, et al. Contamination of health care personnel during removal of personal protective equipment. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:19041910.Google Scholar
6. Darougar, S, Grey, RH, Thaker, U, McSwiggan, DA. Clinical and epidemiological features of adenovirus keratoconjunctivitis in London. Br J Ophthalmol 1983;67:17.Google Scholar
7. Reed, SE. An investigation of the possible transmission of rhinovirus colds through indirect contact. J Hyg (Lond) 1975;75:249258.Google Scholar
8. Siegel, JD, Rhinehart, E, Jackson, M, Chiarello, L; Health Care Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. 2007 Guideline for isolation precautions: preventing transmission of infectious agents in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 2007;35:S65S164.Google Scholar
9. Johnson, DF, Druce, JD, Birch, C, Grayson, ML. A quantitative assessment of the efficacy of surgical and N95 masks to filter influenza virus in patients with acute influenza infection. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49:275277.Google Scholar
10. Rubin, LG, Kohn, N, Nullet, S, Hill, M. Reduction in rate of nosocomial respiratory virus infections in a children’s hospital associated with enhanced isolation precautions. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:152156.Google Scholar