Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:42:26.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of inter- and intraspecific variation in seed dispersal in three South American primates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2023

Ariek Barakat Norford*
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
Kelin Nathaly Echeverry
Affiliation:
Departmento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
Juliana Ramos Obregón
Affiliation:
Departmento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
Pablo R. Stevenson
Affiliation:
Departmento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia Centro de Investigaciones Ecológicas La Macarena, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
*
Corresponding author: Ariek Barakat Norford; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Primate communities vary in their level of redundancy, or overlap, in seed dispersal function, which could be due to body size, degree of frugivory or intraspecific variation, among other factors. In this study, we quantified redundancy in seed dispersal among three sympatric primate species: Lagothrix lagothricha, Alouatta seniculus and Sapajus apella in gallery forests in Meta, Colombia. We compared the median seed width dispersed and the number and species richness of large (≥5.9 mm wide) and very large (>7.5 mm wide) seeds per faecal sample. The medium-sized, highly folivorous A. seniculus mostly dispersed large seeds, the larger, highly frugivorous L. lagothricha dispersed very large and small seeds, and the smaller, partially frugivorous S. apella dispersed the smallest seeds. However, for L. lagothricha and S. apella, we did not find the expected results that adults disperse larger seeds than juveniles. Across species, there is complementarity in seed dispersal in relation to seed size, with L. lagothricha being unique in its contribution to the dispersal of very large seeds both in terms of quantity and richness.

Resumen [español]

Resumen [Español]

Los ensamblajes de primates varían en los papeles como dispersores de semillas, de acuerdo con la redundancia en la sobreposición en la dieta de las especies presentes, tamaño corporal, y grado de frugívoría, entre otros factores. Cuantificamos redundancia entre y dentro de tres primates simpátricos, Lagothrix lagothricha, Alouatta seniculus, y Sapajus apella en su función de dispersión en los bosques de galería de Meta, Colombia. Comparamos el tamaño medio de semillas dispersadas y el número y riqueza de especies de semillas grandes (ancho ≥5.9 mm) y muy grandes (>7.5 mm) dispersadas por muestra fecal. A. seniculus con tamaño intermedio y altamente folívoro dispersó principalmente semillas grandes; L. lagothricha, la especie más grande y altamente frugívora, dispersó principalmente semillas muy grandes y pequeñas; mientras que S. apella, el más pequeño y 50% frugívoro, dispersó muchas semillas pequeñas. Para dos especies, L. lagothricha y S. apella, no encontramos el patrón esperado de que los adultos dispersaron semillas de tamaño más grande de los juveniles. Encontramos complementariedad entre especies en su función de dispersión con relación al tamaño de las semillas, y L. lagothricha se caracterizó por su contribución dispersando semillas muy grandes, tanto en términos de cantidad, como en riqueza.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Animal-mediated seed dispersal is critical for the maintenance of plant diversity in tropical ecosystems (Howe Reference Howe2014). Frugivorous primates play a unique role as seed dispersers, consuming a high diversity of fruits (Poulsen et al. Reference Poulsen, Clark, Connor and Smith2002, Rosin & Poulsen Reference Rosin and Poulsen2016). They can also manipulate fruits inaccessible to avian dispersers and have lower seed predation rates than many other medium- to large-bodied mammal dispersers (Fuzessy et al. Reference Fuzessy, Cornelissen, Janson and Silveira2016, Poulsen et al. Reference Poulsen, Clark, Connor and Smith2002, Rosin & Poulsen Reference Rosin and Poulsen2016, Zambrano et al. Reference Zambrano, Moncada and Stevenson2008). This has resulted in increasing attention in the literature to measuring primate seed dispersal both to better understand how primates shape plant communities and the ecosystem-level implications of primate extinction (Andresen et al. Reference Andresen, Arroyo-Rodríguez and Ramos-Robles2018). In landscapes that have lost primates, in particular larger primates, plant community composition has changed, resulting in a lesser dominance of large-seeded species with a mammalian dispersal syndrome (Ganzhorn et al. Reference Ganzhorn, Fietz, Rakotovao, Schwab and Zinner1999, Gardner et al. Reference Gardner, Bicknell, Baldwin-Cantello, Struebig and Davies2019, Koné et al. Reference Koné, Lambert, Refisch and Bakayoko2008, Stevenson & Aldana Reference Stevenson and Aldana2008, Terborgh et al. Reference Terborgh, Nuñez-Iturri, Pitman, Valverde, Alvarez, Swamy, Pringle and Paine2008, Wang et al. Reference Wang, Sork, Leong and Smith2007).

Whether species are redundant or complementary in their seed dispersal function is not known for most primate communities (Chapman & Russo Reference Chapman, Russo and Campbell2007). Redundancy or complementarity in a community is specific to an ecological process (such as seed dispersal) or a dimension of that ecological process (such as seed size dispersed, Bueno et al. Reference Bueno, Guevara, Ribeiro, Culot, Bufalo and Galetti2013, Lawton & Brown Reference Lawton, Brown, Schulze and Mooney1993). Using the example of seed size, redundant communities are ones in which every species disperses the same-sized seeds, while complementary communities are ones in which each species disperses a different range of seed sizes.

The traits of the disperser species, such as body mass and degree of frugivory, affect what plant species it disperses and the quantity and quality of their dispersal (Chen & Moles Reference Chen and Moles2015, Stevenson et al. Reference Stevenson, Cardona, Cárdenas and Link2021a). In terms of body mass, all primates disperse small and medium seeds, but only large primates can disperse the largest seeds (Peres & Roosmalen Reference Peres and Roosmalen2002). Additionally, primates that are primarily frugivorous generally disperse a larger quantity of seeds (Sales et al. Reference Sales, Culot and Pires2020, Stevenson Reference Stevenson, Dennis, Schupp, Green and Westcott2007).

Intraspecific variation in seed dispersal function may result in redundancy across species even if, on average, they appear to be complementary. For instance, juveniles may be less effective in dispersing fruits with hard husks, which require learned skill and strength to process, either avoiding eating these fruits or eating them in smaller quantities than adults (Eadie Reference Eadie2015). Sexual dimorphism in body size or differences in the proportion of fruit in diet between females and males may also result in intraspecific variation in seed dispersal quantity (Koch et al. Reference Koch, Ganzhorn, Rothman, Chapman and Fichtel2017, Melin et al. Reference Melin, Chiou, Walco, Bergstrom, Kawamura and Fedigan2017). Thus, understanding variation in seed dispersal function requires examining seed dispersal in relation to body size and diet across and within species, the latter pertaining to age/sex class.

We compared inter- and intraspecific variation in the seed dispersal quantity of three sympatric South American primates: the common woolly monkey (Lagothrix lagothricha, Atelidae), the Colombian red howler monkey (Alouatta seniculus, Atelidae) and the black-capped capuchin (Sapajus apella, Cebidae). These species have access to similar plant species, forage socially and are sexually dimorphic, but vary in body mass and degree of frugivory, making them suitable for comparisons. In this study. L. lagothricha are the largest in body mass followed by A. seniculus and then S. apella (Table 1). L. lagothricha have the greatest percentage of fruit in their diet, followed by S. apella, and then A. seniculus (Table 1).

Table 1. Body mass, per cent of fruit in diet, other food items, and IUCN Red List status of Lagothrix lagothricha, Alouatta seniculus, and Sapajus apella

1Peres 1993, 2Smith and Jungers 1997, 3Ayres 1986, 4Rodríguez and Boher 1988, 5Defler and Defler 1996, 6Zarate-Caicedo and Stevenson 2014, 7Julliot and Sabatier 1993, 8Lopez et al. 2005, 9Galetti and Pedroni 1994, 10Izawa 1979, 11Stevenson et al. 2021b, 12Link et al. 2021, 13Boubli et al. 2021

In the Orinoco region of Colombia, where this study takes place, Lagothrix lagothricha populations are rapidly declining and are extirpated in some areas (Stevenson et al. Reference Stevenson, Defler, de la Torre, Moscoso, Palacios, Ravetta, Vermeer, Link, Urbani, Cornejo, Guzmán-Caro, Shanee, Mourthé, Muniz, Wallace and Rylands2021b). Areas without L. lagothricha differ in plant community composition in relation to the trait of seed size (Stevenson & Aldana Reference Stevenson and Aldana2008), and thus, we will be analyzing differences in seed dispersal among species using this trait. Our study focuses on the quantity of seed dispersal (i.e., the number of seeds defecated). Not all the seeds found in the faeces will successfully recruit (seed dispersal quality). However, L. lagothricha and A. seniculus are primarily seed dispersers, rather than seed predators (Benítez-Malvido et al. Reference Benítez-Malvido, Ma, Pierro, Lombera, Guillén and Estrada2014, Stevenson Reference Stevenson2000). Lagothrix spp. are seed predators for 6% of the species they eat and occasionally seed predators for 16% (Stevenson et al. Reference Stevenson, Castellanos, Pizarro and Garavito2002). Alouatta spp. are seed predators for only 1% of the species they eat and occasionally predate 6% (Stevenson et al. Reference Stevenson, Castellanos, Pizarro and Garavito2002). Thus, the presence of intact seeds in their faeces almost always indicates that they can disperse those species. S. apella can be seed dispersers or predators, but the predated seeds are usually masticated or spit out, making them distinct from those with the potential to successfully recruit (Bossier et al. Reference Bossier, Feer, Henry and Forget2020, Galetti & Pedroni Reference Galetti and Pedroni1994, Julliot et al. Reference Julliot, Simmen, Zhang, Bongers, Charles-Dominique, Forget and Théry2001).

We first ask how the overall seed dispersal function of primates varies among and within species predicting: (1) among species, the largest species, Lagothrix lagothricha, will disperse the largest median seed size, followed by Alouatta seniculus, and then Sapajus apella. Within species, the largest individuals, adult males, will disperse the largest seed size, followed by adult females and then juveniles. (2) Even in cases where species are complementary, some of their age/sex classes will be redundant (i.e., there will be redundancy among species, but only when considering age/sex class). We also ask how the dispersal of large seeds (≥5.9 mm, including very large seeds) and very large seeds (>7.5 mm) differs among and within species, predicting the following: (1) among species, the largest species, L. lagothricha, will disperse the greatest number of large and very large seeds per faecal sample, followed by A. seniculus, and then S. apella, which we predict cannot disperse very large seeds. Within species, the largest individuals, adult males, will disperse the greatest number of large and very large seeds, followed by females, and then juveniles. (2) Due to their higher degree of frugivory, L. lagothricha will disperse the greatest number of plant species, including the large- and very large-seeded plant species on which we focus in this study. A. seniculus will disperse more very large-seeded plant species than S. apella, which will not disperse very large seeds due to their small body size. However, S. apella will disperse more large-seeded species than A. seniculus because both species can disperse these seeds; however, S. apella is more frugivorous.

Materials and methods

Study sites

Two of the authors, KNE and JRO, conducted fieldwork in Santa Rosa and Rey Zamuro in Meta, Colombia, which are located ∼23 km apart. Rey Zamuro (73o23’W, 03o32’N) is a 300-ha reserve established in 1998 (Sandino Reference Sandino2006). It is 260 msl and has an average temperature of 25.6oC and annual precipitation of 2513 mm (IDEAM 2019). This reserve consists of gallery forests and some fragments, pasture and savanna. Santa Rosa (73o38’W, 03o36’N) is 350 msl and has a mean temperature of 28oC and annual precipitation of 2000–2500 mm (Obregón Reference Obregón2007). It is a cattle ranch with a total area of around 365 ha, including 50 ha of gallery forest in three fragments (Caro & Ardila Reference Caro and Ardila2004). At both sites, the primate groups observed occupied only a subset of the area of the full site (for Lagothrix lagothricha, an area of forest around 150 ha and for Alouatta seniculus and Sapajus apella, a 32-ha fragment, Figure 1). In both cases, this area is surrounded by pasture and the forest is occasionally used by cattle (Caro & Ardila Reference Caro and Ardila2004, pers. obs.). Both sites have intermediate values of tree diversity (between 64 and 119 species/hectare), and the vegetation is dominated by species in the Burseraceae, Moraceae, Clusiaceae, Peraceae and Fabaceae families (Stevenson & Aldana Reference Stevenson and Aldana2008). Based on data from 1-ha vegetation plots at each site, the sites have a Jaccard Index, number of shared genera (31) over number of total genera (107, 84 in Rey Zamuro and 54 in Santa Rosa), of 29, indicating they are dissimilar (Janson & Vegelius Reference Janson and Vegelius1981). However, the widths of seeds dispersed by endozoochory in these plots do not differ (Appendix S1, Supplementary dataset 3). Most of the data collection for all species happened during the rainy season (March-November) when most species fruit (Chacón-Moreno Reference Chacón-Moreno2004, Monasterio & Sarmiento Reference Monasterio and Sarmiento1976).

Figure 1. Satellite images of a. Rey Zamuro and b. Santa Rosa outlined in yellow. The forest outlined in orange within the sites is where the study groups live. The study sites are ∼23 km apart. Images are from Google Earth (Google 2022).

Data collection

We used two datasets in this study, one on Lagothrix lagothricha at Rey Zamuro (Supplementary dataset 1) and one on Alouatta seniculus and Sapajus apella at Santa Rosa (Obregón Reference Obregón2007, Supplementary dataset 2). These species were sympatric in the study region prior to the extirpation of L. lagothricha. At Rey Zamuro, we followed a group of reintroduced Lagothrix lagothricha, including two adult females, one adult male and one juvenile/sub-adult female. We define juveniles in this study as individuals that have been weened but have not yet bred. For one of the adult females, we collected faecal samples from November 2018 to March 2020; however, the other adult female was predated in March 2019 and thus faecal sample collection from her stopped after that. The adult male and juvenile were released in November 2019, which is when our data collection on these individuals commenced. All individuals underwent in situ rehabilitation and had their diet supplemented for the first 5 months post-release. Most of the faecal samples came from January to August, throughout which L. lagothricha consumed seeds representative of the smallest and largest seeds they dispersed in this study. The exception was in June and July when they only consumed a few species with seeds larger than 5.48 mm. We washed all faecal samples using a sieve with 0.5 mm mesh (smallest seeds found were 1 mm wide). Then, we counted and identified all intact seeds to the species level and measured the length and width (the second largest axis of the seed) of 5–10 seeds from most species. Usually, we were able to assign species status for seeds, but in a few cases, we could only determine the genus and treated them as morphospecies (e.g., Protium sp. 1). From this dataset, we used all faecal samples for which the seeds were identified, resulting in 187 samples for L. lagothricha (35 from adult males, 119 from adult females and 33 from juveniles).

At Santa Rosa, we followed one group of Alouatta seniculus (two adult males, two adult females, two juveniles) and one group of Sapajus apella (one adult male, one adult female and one juvenile) for four months (September to December 2006). For both species, we conducted focal follows for five days every month, with adult males followed for two of the days, adult females for two of the days and juveniles for one day, collecting all faecal samples from these individuals during the follows. We collected most A. seniculus faecal samples in the middle of the day when the group members defecate together, as it was easiest to identify which faecal samples came from which individuals at that time. Similar to L. lagothricha, throughout the period of collection, A. seniculus and S. apella consumed seeds representative of the smallest and largest seeds they dispersed in this study. We counted and identified all intact seeds greater than 1 mm in length (smallest seed was 0.8 mm wide) to the species level and measured the length and width of 30 seeds of each species. For seeds that were 1–3 mm long, we divided the sample into quadrats, counted the seeds in one quadrat and multiplied this by 4 to estimate the total number of seeds in the faecal sample. We identified all seeds to the species level or, if not possible, to the genus level and used morphospecies. Our dataset resulted in 57 samples for A. seniculus (24 from adult males, 24 from adult females, 9 from juveniles) and 110 samples for S. apella (50 from adult males, 36 from adult females, 24 from juveniles).

Statistical analysis

We quantified seed dispersal in three ways: (1) the overall median seed size dispersed for each species and age/sex class within that species (adult male, adult female, juvenile); (2) the mean number of large and very large seeds per faecal sample, as measured using the Poisson parameter λ for each species and age/sex class within that species; and (3) the richness of large and very large seeds dispersed, as estimated using Bernoulli product sample-based extrapolation (Supplementary code 1). All these metrics are based on seed width. We chose to use width rather than length as it is the limiting dimension in the ability of the primate to swallow the seed whole, and thus, frugivore selection acts on seed width rather than length, which can vary more (Mazer & Wheelwright Reference Mazer and Wheelwright1993). We performed all analyses in RStudio v1.3.1093 (RStudio Team 2020).

Using a permutation test, we determined the widths of seeds dispersed at the species level had unequal variances for some of the pairs of species (Appendix S2). Therefore, we use the Fligner-Policello test to compare median seed width dispersed by different species and age/sex classes using the R package RVAideMemoire (Hervé Reference Hervé2021). The Fligner-Policello test is similar to the rank-based two-sample Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, although it does not assume equal variances. It accounts for the variance of each of the groups in the test statistic, U (Fligner & Policello Reference Fligner and Policello1981). In this analysis, we did not include Dipteryx micrantha (width = 20 mm), which we only found in the faeces of L. lagothricha, in the analysis as there were not seeds of comparable size known to be available to A. seniculus and S. apella during the data collection period. For analyses excluding the smallest seeds, which L. lagothricha and S. apella consumed in the hundreds to thousands, see Appendix S3. We applied a Bonferroni correction, using a significance level of α = 0.05/16 = 0.003, to address the potential of inflated Type I error due to multiple comparisons (Dunn Reference Dunn1961).

Second, we compared the number of large and very large seeds per faecal sample for each species and age/sex class within species. We defined very large seeds as those with a width greater than 7.5 mm and large seeds as those with a width greater than or equal to 5.9 mm. In the analyses, the large seed category encompasses the very large seed category. The threshold of 1 cm in length is often used to define large seeds; however, there is not a commonly used equivalent in width (Markl et al. Reference Markl, Schleuning, Forget, Jordano, Lambert, Traveset, Wright and Böhning-Gaese2012, Stevenson et al. Reference Stevenson, Pineda and Samper2005). Therefore, we chose our thresholds such that 25% of the species dispersed were considered ‘very large’ and 50% were considered ‘large’. Not all the age/sex classes of Alouatta seniculus and Sapajus apella dispersed very large seeds, and thus, we only do the intraspecific comparisons of age/sex classes for very large seeds for Lagothrix lagothricha.

As this is count data, we assumed a Poisson distribution and found the value of λ for each species and age/sex class for which the negative log-likelihood (NLL) was at its minimum (Bolker Reference Bolker and Bolker2007). The NLL of the Poisson distribution is:

(1) $$NLL = \;\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\left( {\lambda - x_i\log \left( \lambda \right) + \log \left( {{x_i}!} \right)} \right)} $$

where x i is the number of large or very large seeds/faecal sample for species or age/sex class i. For very large seeds, we found the NLL for all values from 0, the minimum number of seeds/faecal sample, to 14, the maximum, at intervals of 0.01, while for large seeds, we searched for the NLL in the range of 0 to 94, as above this yielded NLL values of negative infinity. Then, we compared λ values using 99.8 per cent confidence intervals. We used the threshold for significance of α = 0.05/18 = 0.002 as we did 18 comparisons (Dunn Reference Dunn1961).

For both the overall median seed size dispersed and the λ of the number of large and very large seeds/faecal sample, we made two sets of comparisons: (1) among species and (2) among age/sex classes within species (adult males, adult females and juveniles). For the overall median seed size dispersed, we also did post hoc comparisons between age/sex classes that differed from other classes within its species and the other species.

Finally, we determined the contribution of each species to large- and very large-seeded dispersal in terms of the number of plant species they dispersed. We only did this analysis at the primate species level as not all age/sex classes within Alouatta seniculus and Sapajus apella dispersed very large seeds. We used Bernoulli product sample-based extrapolation to estimate the number of large and very large-seeded species we would have found each primate species to disperse had we collected as many samples for A. seniculus and S. apella as we did for L. lagothricha. This is calculated as follows (Colwell et al. Reference Colwell, Chao, Gotelli, Lin, Mao, Chazdon and Longino2012):

(2) $${s_{i,187}} = {s_{obs}} + {\hat Q_0}[1 - \left( {1 - {{{Q_1}} \over {{Q_1} + T{{\hat Q}_0}}}{)^{{t^*}}}} \right]$$

where s i,187 is the estimated number of species with large or very large seeds dispersed by species i if we had collected 187 faecal samples, s obs is the observed number of large or very large-seeded species dispersed by that species, Q 1 is the number of species found in only one faecal sample, T is the number of faecal samples collected, and t* is the number of faecal samples needed to reach a sample size of 187. The uncertainty in this equation comes from $ \hat{ Q}_0$ , which is the estimated number of large or very large-seeded plants that the primate disperses, but we did not find in our samples (Chao Reference Chao1987). We estimated the value for $ \hat{Q}_0$ and its 95th per cent confidence intervals in the R package Spade (Species Prediction and Diversity Estimation, Chao et al. Reference Chao, Ma, Hsieh and Chiu2016).

Ethical statement

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the Regional Governmental Institution (Cormacarena) permit 1376 of June 27, 2013 ‘to collect specimens of wild species of biological diversity for non-commercial scientific research’. This study also complies with the Universidad de Los Andes ethics committee guidelines on the care and use of regulated animals.

Results

We collected a total of 354 faecal samples, which contained 53454 seeds of 43 plant species (Table 2). Lagothrix lagothricha dispersed 22 species, Alouatta seniculus dispersed 9, and Sapajus apella dispersed 18 (Table 2). The three primate species dispersed 18 species with large seeds and 10 species with very large seeds. Overall, 6% of the seeds in the faecal samples were large (width ≥ 5.9 mm), and 0.5% were very large (width > 7.5 mm).

Table 2. The sample size and species richness of all seeds and large- and very large-seeded species, and the range of seed widths of the dispersed seeds for Lagothrix lagothricha, Alouatta seniculus, and Sapajus apella. The faecal samples for L. lagothricha are from Rey Zamuro (November 2018 to March 2020) and for A. seniculus and S. apella are from Santa Rosa (September to December 2006), both located in Meta, Colombia

Overall, Lagothrix lagothricha dispersed seeds that were 1.0–12.05 mm wide (and the excluded species, Dipteryx micrantha, which is 20 mm), Alouatta seniculus dispersed seeds 4.6–9.8 mm wide, and Sapajus apella dispersed seeds 0.8–9.8 mm wide (see Supplementary datasets 1 and 2 for the individual plant species dispersed by each primate). When examining all seeds dispersed, we found, as predicted, that L. lagothricha (FP Test: U = −529.8, p < 0.001) and A. seniculus (FP Test: U = −1474.4, p < 0.001) dispersed a larger median seed width than S. apella (Table 3, Figure 2). Contrary to predictions, A. seniculus dispersed a larger median seed width than the largest primate, L. lagothricha (FP Test: U = −71.7, p < 0.001, Table 3, Figure 2).

Table 3. Comparisons in the median seed width dispersed by Lagothrix lagothricha (Ll), Alouatta seniculus (As), and Sapajus apella (Sa) across species, within species among adult males (M), adult females (F), and juveniles (J), and post hoc comparisons. Represented is the U statistic and p-value. In bold are significant results (p < 0.003). For the results of the analysis excluding seeds < 1.1 mm, refer to Appendix S3. Sample sizes, equal to the number of seeds dispersed, are as follows: L. lagothricha (total: 4017, adult males: 360, adult females: 3455, juveniles: 202), A. seniculus (total: 3960, adult males: 1595, adult females: 1898, juveniles: 467), S. apella (total: 45462, adult males: 20511, adult females: 24469, juveniles: 482)

Figure 2. Boxplots of the widths (mm) of seeds dispersed by each species (Lagothrix lagothricha: N = 4032 seeds, Alouatta seniculus: N = 3960, Sapajus apella: N = 45462) and age/sex class (adult males, adult females, juveniles). These boxplots do not include Dipteryx micrantha (20 mm), as this species was excluded from this analysis. The faecal samples for L. lagothricha are from Rey Zamuro (November 2018 to March 2020) and for A. seniculus and S. apella are from Santa Rosa (September to December 2006), both located in Meta, Colombia. Line: median, box: interquartile range, points: outliers, defined as greater than 1.5 times the interquartile range away from the first or third quartile. Note that due to the large number of small seeds in the faeces of adult S. apella, the interquartile range is much smaller than for other species and age/sex classes and thus appears as a line in the figure. Under each species name is the range of seed sizes (included in the statistical analyses) it dispersed and next to each age/sex class is the number of individuals sampled. The dotted lines represent the thresholds for ‘large’ and ‘very large’ seeds used in this study: ≥ 5.9, > 7.5). For the results of the analysis excluding seeds < 1.1 mm, refer to Appendix S3.

When comparing overall seed dispersal within species, we found that contrary to predictions, Lagothrix lagothricha juveniles dispersed a larger median seed width than adult males (FP Test: U = −3.2, p = 0.001), which dispersed a larger median seed width than adult females (FP Test: U = −30.5, p < 0.001, Table 3, Figure 2). Alouatta seniculus adult males and females dispersed the same median seed width (FP Test: U = 1.3, p = 0.197), while juveniles dispersed a smaller seed width than adult males (FP Test: U = 6.4, p < 0.001) and adult females (FP Test: U = 7.2, p < 0.001, Table 3, Figure 2). Sapajus apella adult males dispersed a smaller median seed width than females (FP Test: U = 3.9, p = 0.001) and the smallest individuals, juveniles, dispersed a larger median seed width than adult males (FP Test: U = −486.2, p < 0.001) and adult females (FP Test: U = −474.9, p < 0.001, Table 3, Figure 2).

Lagothrix lagothricha adult females (FP Test: U = −492.4, p < 0.001) and Alouatta seniculus juveniles (FP Test: U (= −59.8, p < 0.001), although statistically different from the rest of the individuals in their species in terms of the median seed width they dispersed, were not redundant (i.e., did not overlap) with other species (Table 3, Figure 2). L. lagothricha and Sapajus apella juveniles, however, were redundant with other species, with L. lagothricha juveniles dispersing the same median seed width as A. seniculus (FP Test: U = 0.0, p = 0.986, Table 3, Figure 2) and S. apella juveniles dispersing a larger median seed width than L. lagothricha (FP Test: U = −22.0, p < 0.001, Table 3, Figure 2).

Alouatta seniculus dispersed the greatest number of large seeds (≥ 5.9 mm) per faecal sample (99.8 per cent confidence interval: 37.25, 42.40), followed by Sapajus apella (CI: 4.21, 5.49) and then Lagothrix lagothricha (CI: 3.03, 3.86, Table 4). All age/sex classes of L. lagothricha dispersed similar numbers of large seeds per faecal sample (CI: adult males: 3.04, 5.15, adult females: 2.89, 3.92, juveniles: 2.19, 4.06, Table 4). A. seniculus adult males (CI: 35.99, 43.94) and females (CI: 42.53, 51.15) dispersed similar numbers of large seeds per faecal sample, while juveniles dispersed fewer (CI: 16.73, 26.20). In S. apella, adult females (CI: 5.15, 7.74) dispersed more large seeds than males (CI: 3.16, 4.89), while juveniles did not differ from either of the adult sex classes (CI: 3.12, 5.73, Table 4). L. lagothricha dispersed the most large-seeded species (14 species), followed by A. seniculus (95th per cent confidence interval; 7.90, 8.19) and then S. apella (CI: 7.67, 7.68 species).

Table 4. Comparisons of the number of large (≥5.9 mm wide) and very large (>7.5 mm) seeds dispersed per faecal sample among Lagothrix lagothricha (Ll), Alouatta seniculus (As), and Sapajus apella (Sa) and adult male (M), adult female (F), and juvenile (J) age/sex classes. Represented is the mean and 99.8 per cent confidence intervals of the maximum likelihood estimate of the Poisson parameter λ. Sample sizes, equal to the number of faecal samples collected, are as follows: L. lagothricha (total: 187, adult males: 35, adult females: 119, juveniles: 33), A. seniculus (total: 57, adult males: 24, adult females: 24, juveniles: 9), S. apella (total: 110, adult males: 50, adult females: 36, juveniles: 24)

For the dispersal of very large-seeded plants (>7.5 mm wide), as predicted, Lagothrix lagothricha dispersed the greatest number of very large seeds per faecal sample (99.8 per cent confidence interval: 1.10, 1.62 seeds per faecal sample). Alouatta seniculus (CI: 0.05, 0.38 seeds per faecal sample) and Sapajus apella (CI: 0.02, 0.16 seeds per faecal sample) dispersed similar numbers of very large seeds per faecal sample (Table 4). Only A. seniculus adult females and S. apella adults dispersed very large seeds. L. lagothricha adult males (CI: 1.27, 2.74 seeds per faecal sample), adult females (CI: 0.89, 1.48 seeds per faecal sample) and juveniles (CI: 0.88, 2.16 seeds per faecal sample) dispersed similar numbers of very large seeds per faecal sample (Table 4). Finally, in terms of the richness of very large seeds dispersed, as expected, L. lagothricha dispersed more very large-seeded species (7 species) than A. seniculus (95th per cent confidence interval: 3.36, 3.69 species) and S. apella (CI: 3.62, 3.67 species).

Discussion

Our analysis demonstrated that Lagothrix lagothricha, Alouatta seniculus and Sapajus apella are complementary in their seed dispersal function in terms of seed size, as is in line with our predictions. Our observations across species align with prior studies showing species that are primarily frugivores disperse a greater richness of plant species and larger seeds are more likely to be consumed by larger primates (Fuzessy et al. Reference Fuzessy, Janson and Silveira2018). However, when comparing within species, we found that, despite being smaller, juveniles dispersed a similar median seed size to adults and, in the case of L. lagothricha and S. apella, similar numbers of large seeds per faecal sample.

Although Lagothrix lagothricha dispersed a smaller median seed width than Alouatta seniculus, they were critical in the dispersal of very large seeds. L. lagothricha was the only species in which adult males, adult females and juveniles all dispersed very large seeds, and they dispersed the greatest number of large- and very large-seeded plant species. The adult females also dispersed the largest seed found in this study, Dipteryx micrantha, which is 20 mm in width. This supports observations at other sites of L. lagothricha dispersing high quantities and richness of large-seeded plants (Fuzessy et al. Reference Fuzessy, Janson and Silveira2018, Stevenson Reference Stevenson2000, Stevenson et al. Reference Stevenson, Pineda and Samper2005). L. lagothricha also contributed to the dispersal of some of the smallest seeds in this study, with adult females and males dispersing hundreds of Ficus sp. seeds (1 mm in width). Excluding these from the analysis would have resulted in L. lagothricha dispersing a larger median seed size than A. seniculus (Appendix S3). Additionally, L. lagothricha have a high seed dispersal quality, with digestion that decreases latency to germination and has a neutral or positive effect on germination rates (in 15 of 16 species studied, Stevenson et al. Reference Stevenson, Castellanos, Pizarro and Garavito2002), and with an average dispersal distance of 150–500 m (Stevenson Reference Stevenson2000). Compared to other plant species, Ficus sp. seeds appeared in large numbers per faecal sample. Therefore, we would expect germination rates to be low for this species; however, secondary dispersal can improve germination (Andresen Reference Andresen1999).

Alouatta seniculus, the second largest and least frugivorous primate in this study, dispersed several species with large seeds, but contributed little to the dispersal of species with small or very large seeds. Contrary to previous findings, A. seniculus dispersed a greater richness of large-seeded plants than Sapajus apella despite being primarily folivorous (Bufalo et al. Reference Bufalo, Galetti and Culot2016, Julliot & Sabatier Reference Julliot and Sabatier1993, Lopez et al. Reference Lopez, Terborgh and Ceballos2005). This may be because A. seniculus mostly consumed large-seeded species in this study, although they have been observed dispersing Ficus and other small seeds (Stevenson et al. Reference Stevenson, Quiñones and Ahumada2000). A. seniculus provided most of the dispersal for these species, as Lagothrix lagothricha mostly dispersed smaller and very large seeds and Sapajus apella mostly dispersed smaller seeds. Similar to L. lagothricha, Alouatta species provide high-quality dispersal. Their digestion decreases the latency to germination and has a neutral to positive effect on germination of seeds (in all 5 species studied, Benítez-Malvido et al. Reference Benítez-Malvido, Ma, Pierro, Lombera, Guillén and Estrada2014, in 6 of 7 species studied, Stevenson et al. Reference Stevenson, Castellanos, Pizarro and Garavito2002). Additionally, they disperse seeds at an average distance of 290 m (Julliot et al. Reference Julliot, Simmen, Zhang, Bongers, Charles-Dominique, Forget and Théry2001). Their mass defecation patterns attract dung beetles, which perform secondary dispersal (Fuzessy et al. Reference Fuzessy, Sobrai and Culot2021).

Sapajus apella dispersed mostly smaller seeds, including the smallest seed in this study, Miconia ternatifolia (0.8 mm in width). Although Lagothrix lagothricha and Alouatta seniculus dispersed smaller seeds, S. apella dispersed the smallest seeds on average, which we expected given their smaller body size. Only the adults dispersed very large seeds, at the upper range of what has been recorded to be dispersed by S. apella (Julliot et al. Reference Julliot, Simmen, Zhang, Bongers, Charles-Dominique, Forget and Théry2001). In terms of their overall seed dispersal, S. apella were redundant with L. lagothricha in their dispersal of mostly smaller seeds, but not very large seeds. They had almost no redundancy in terms of seed size with A. seniculus. There has been little research on seed dispersal quality for S. apella, but past findings suggest they have an average dispersal distance of 390 m and that their gut passage does not affect germination rates or latency (Julliot et al. Reference Julliot, Simmen, Zhang, Bongers, Charles-Dominique, Forget and Théry2001). Similar to Ficus sp. in the faeces of L. lagothricha, seeds of M. ternatifolia are unlikely to have high germination rates without secondary dispersal (Andresen Reference Andresen1999).

There was less intraspecific variation than expected and what we did find contrasted with predictions based on body size, except for Alouatta seniculus juveniles dispersing a smaller median seed width than the adults. A. seniculus juveniles and Lagothrix lagothricha adult females did not differ enough from the other individuals in their species as to be redundant with other species. However, L. lagothricha juveniles dispersed the same median seed width as A. seniculus, and Sapajus apella juveniles dispersed a greater median seed width than L. lagothricha. There are factors that affect what fruits certain age/sex classes consume that are unrelated to seed size but may contribute to the differences in dispersal seen in L. lagothricha and S. apella juveniles. It has been argued that some fruits require learned skill or strength to process, which may result in juveniles dispersing fewer seeds of certain species in general (Eadie Reference Eadie2015). However, for our study species it is common for all age-sex classes to feed from the food items preferred by each species (Stevenson et al. Reference Stevenson, Quiñones and Ahumada2000).

For Sapajus apella, this may be in part due to differential habitat use, as S. apella juveniles can forage on smaller branches due to their small size and spend more time playing on the ground. This can result in them consuming fruits of small, understory plants at greater frequencies than adults (Wheeler & Hammerschmidt Reference Wheeler and Hammerschmidt2013, Williamson et al. Reference Williamson, Webb, Dubreuil, Lopez, Hernandez, Fedigan and Melin2021). For example, juveniles dispersed nearly half of the seeds of Psychotria spp. in this study, which come from small, understory trees. Juvenile L. lagothricha tend to eat less fruit than adults and are subject to displacement from fruiting trees by adult males, which could lead to differences in the proportions of preferred species of fruit in juvenile vs. adult male diets (Gonzalez et al. Reference Gonzalez, Clavijo, Betancur and Stevenson2016, Stevenson et al. Reference Stevenson, Quiñones and Ahumada1994). However, for L. lagothricha, these results contrast with what was found at the nearby Tinigua National Park, where juveniles (N = 5-8) preferred smaller-sized seeds (Stevenson et al. Reference Stevenson, Pineda and Samper2005). Our results may be due to the available fruits during the limited study period and preferences of the individual juvenile in this study. Finally, for both species, we observed different age/sex classes on different days, so differences in frequency may also have resulted from changing availability of fruits over the observation period.

Further research is needed to understand whether these patterns in seed dispersal by Lagothrix lagothricha, Alouatta seniculus, and Sapajus apella at Santa Rosa and Rey Zamuro are seen more broadly in these species. Our sample sizes were limited as the small fragments of these sites could only support small social groups. Additionally, L. lagothricha at this site were reintroduced, which may affect their foraging behaviour (Ramírez & Stevenson Reference Ramírez and Stevenson2020).

Our finding of the unique role of Lagothrix lagothricha in dispersing very large-seeded plants is consistent with observations in this region. Fragments without L. lagothricha have been found to have different plant assemblages, dominated by smaller-seeded plants, than those with this disperser (Stevenson & Aldana Reference Stevenson and Aldana2008). Although Alouatta seniculus and Sapajus apella are still present in many forests fragmented by agriculture due to their higher tolerance of human disturbance (Benchimol & Peres Reference Benchimol and Peres2014, Crockett Reference Crockett1998, Michalski & Peres Reference Michalski and Peres2005), they are not performing the same seed dispersal function as L. lagothricha. This study focused on how this could result in a loss of dispersal for large-seeded species, but there are likely other plant traits with changing frequencies in these communities due to the loss of L. lagothricha. L. lagothricha contributes to the dispersal of a large richness of species and their loss is unlikely to be fully compensated by A. seniculus and S. apella, which disperse fewer species of plants (Stevenson Reference Stevenson2000).

This study provides evidence of the level of complementarity in seed dispersal function that can exist in primate communities and highlights the need to understand primate seed dispersal in the context of the community of dispersers, rather than solely individual species. Additionally, we found that singular traits, such as body mass and degree of frugivory, cannot account for all the variation that exists in seed dispersal function. Individual variation within species due to age and activity patterns can affect the seed dispersal service provided by that species and should be taken into consideration when quantifying seed dispersal function in primates. More comparative research is needed to determine the role of primates as seed dispersers and the implications of their loss on ecosystems.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467423000263

Acknowledgements

We thank the Sánchez family for providing us the opportunity to work on their farm (Santa Rosa). Additionally, we thank Cesar Barrera for the opportunity to work at Rey Zamuro and our funding source for this project: Colciencias. We thank H. Resit Akçakaya and Andreas Koenig for their input early in the design of these analyses, Heather Lynch for her guidance on the statistical methods used in this research, and all three of them, Rafael D’Andrea, and five anonymous reviewers for their comments that helped improve this manuscript.

Financial support

Colciencias (#120465843684) provided the funding for the reintroduction of Lagothrix lagothricha at Rey Zamuro. The faecal sample collection for this species was funded by this grant.

Competing interests

The authors declare none.

References

Andresen, E (1999) Seed dispersal by monkeys and the fate of dispersed seeds in a Peruvian forest. Biotropica 31, 145158.Google Scholar
Andresen, E, Arroyo-Rodríguez, V and Ramos-Robles, M (2018) Primate seed dispersal: old and new challenges. International Journal of Primatology 39, 443456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, JMC (1986) Uakaris and Amazonian flooded forest. PhD dissertation, Department of Vertebrate Anatomy, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Benchimol, M and Peres, CA (2014) Predicting primate local extinctions within “real-world” forest fragments: a pan-neotropical analysis. American Journal of Primatology 76, 289302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benítez-Malvido, J, Ma, A, Pierro, G-D, Lombera, R, Guillén, S and Estrada, A (2014) Seed source, seed traits, and frugivore habits: implications for dispersal quality of two sympatric primates. American Journal of Botany 101, 970978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolker, B (2007) Likelihood and all that. In Bolker, B (ed.), Ecological Models and Data in R. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 227292.Google Scholar
Bossier, O, Feer, F, Henry, P-Y and Forget, P-M (2020) Modifications of the rain forest frugivore community are associated with reduced seed removal at the community level. Ecological Applications 30, e02086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boubli, JP, Alves, SL, Buss, G, Calouro, AM, Carvalho, A, Ceballos-Mago, N, Heymann, EW, Lynch Alfaro, J, Martins, AB, Messias, M, Mittermeier, RA, Mollinedo, J, Moscoso, P, Palacios, E, Ravetta, A, Rumiz, DI, Rylands, AB, Shanee, S, Stevenson, PR, de la Torre, S and Urbani, B (2020) Sapajus apella. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T172351505A172353050. Available at https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T172351505A172353050.en (accessed 3 January 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno, RS, Guevara, R, Ribeiro, MC, Culot, L, Bufalo, FS and Galetti, M (2013) Functional redundancy and complementarities of seed dispersal by the last neotropical megafrugivores. PLoS ONE 8, e56252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bufalo, FS, Galetti, M and Culot, L (2016) Seed dispersal by primates and implications for the conservation of a biodiversity hotspot, the Atlantic Forest of South America. International Journal of Primatology 37, 333349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caro, OL and Ardila, I (2004) Diseño de un sendero ecológico interpretative e inventario general de la vegetación nativa del bosque de gallería ubicado en la hacienda Santa Rosa, municípos de San Martín, Meta, Orinoquía colombiana. Informe final, Bogotá.Google Scholar
Chacón-Moreno, EJ (2004) Mapping savanna ecosystems of the Llanos del Orinoco using multitemporal NOAA satellite imagery. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 5, 4153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, A (1987) Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43, 783791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, A, Ma, KH, Hsieh, TC and Chiu, C-H (2016) SpadeR (Species-richness Prediction and Diversity Estimation in R): an R package in CRAN.Google Scholar
Chapman, CA and Russo, SE (2007) Primate seed dispersal: linking behavioral ecology with forest community structure. In Campbell, CJ (ed.), Primates in Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 510525.Google Scholar
Chen, S-C and Moles, AT (2015) A mammoth mouthful? A test of the idea that larger animals ingest larger seeds. Global Ecology and Biogeography 24, 12691280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colwell, RK, Chao, A, Gotelli, NJ, Lin, S-Y, Mao, CX, Chazdon, RL and Longino, JT (2012) Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages. Journal of Plant Ecology 5, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crockett, CM (1998) Conservation biology of the genus Alouatta. International Journal of Primatology 19, 549578 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defler, TR and Defler, SB (1996) Diet of a group of Lagothrix lagothricha lagothricha in southeastern Colombia. International Journal of Primatology 17, 161190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, OJ (1961) Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association 56, 5264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eadie, EC (2015) Ontogeny of foraging competence in capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus) for easy versus difficult to acquire fruits: a test of the needing to learn hypothesis. PLoS ONE 10, e0138001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fligner, MA and Policello, GE (1981) Robust rank procedures for the Behrens-Fisher problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association 76, 484507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuzessy, LF, Cornelissen, TG, Janson, C and Silveira, FAO (2016) How do primates affect seed germination? A meta-analysis of gut passage effects on Neotropical primates. Oikos 125, 10691080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuzessy, LF, Janson, C and Silveira, FAO (2018) Effects of seed size and frugivory degree on dispersal by Neotropical frugivores. Acta Oecologia 93, 4147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuzessy, L, Sobrai, G and Culot, L (2021) Linking howler monkey ranging and defecation patterns to primary and secondary seed dispersal. American Journal of Primatology 82, e23354.Google Scholar
Galetti, M and Pedroni, F (1994) Seasonal diet of capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in a semideciduous forest in south-east Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 10, 2739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganzhorn, J, Fietz, J, Rakotovao, E, Schwab, D and Zinner, D (1999) Lemurs and the regeneration of dry deciduous forest in Madagascar. Conservation Biology 13, 794804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, CJ, Bicknell, JE, Baldwin-Cantello, W, Struebig, MJ and Davies, ZG (2019) Quantifying the impacts of defaunation on natural forest regeneration in a global meta-analysis. Nature Communications 10, 4590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, M, Clavijo, L, Betancur, J and Stevenson, PR (2016) Fruits eaten by woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagothricha) at local and regional scales. Primates 57, 241251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hervé, M (2021) RVAideMemoire (Testing and plotting procedures for biostatistics): an R package in CRAN.Google Scholar
Howe, HF (2014) Diversity storage: implications for tropical conservation and restoration. Global Ecology and Conservation 2, 349358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IDEAM (2019) Boletín predicción climática 2019. Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales. Available at: http://www.ideam.gov.co/web/tiempo-y-clima/prediccion-climatica/-/document_library_display/ljPLJWRaQzCm/view/79336843 (accessed 23 January 2022).Google Scholar
Izawa, K (1979) Foods and feeding behavior of wild black-capped capuchin (Cebus apella). Primates 20, 5776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, D and Vegelius, J (1981) Measures of ecological association. Oecologia 49, 371376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Julliot, C and Sabatier, D (1993) Diet of the red howler monkey (Alouatta seniculus) in French Guiana. International Journal of Primatology 14, 527550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julliot, C, Simmen, B and Zhang, S (2001) Frugivory and seed dispersal by three Neotropical primates: impact on plant regeneration. In Bongers, F, Charles-Dominique, P, Forget, PM and Théry, M (eds.), Nouragues. Monographiae Biologicae , vol 80. New York: Springer, pp. 197205.Google Scholar
Koch, F, Ganzhorn, JU, Rothman, JM, Chapman, CA and Fichtel, C (2017) Sex and seasonal differences in diet and nutrient intake in Verreaux’s sifakas (Propithecus verreauxi). American Journal of Primatology 79, e22595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koné, I, Lambert, JE, Refisch, J and Bakayoko, A (2008) Primate seed dispersal and its potential role in maintaining useful tree species in the Taï region, Côte-d’Ivoire: implications for the conservation of forest fragments. Tropical Conservation Science 1, 293306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, JH and Brown, VK (1993) Redundancy in ecosystems. In Schulze, ED and Mooney, HA (eds.), Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function. Berlin: Springer, pp. 255270.Google Scholar
Link, A, Palacios, E, Cortés-Ortiz, L, Stevenson, PR, Cornejo, FM, Mittermeier, RA, Shanee, S, de la Torre, S, Boubli, JP, Guzmán-Caro, DC, Moscoso, P, Urbani, B and Seyjagat, J (2021) Alouatta seniculus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021: e.T198676562A198687134. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-2.RLTS.T198676562A198687134.en (accessed 3 January 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, GO, Terborgh, J and Ceballos, N (2005) Food selection by a hyperdense population of red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus). Journal of Tropical Ecology 21, 445450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markl, JS, Schleuning, M, Forget, PM, Jordano, P, Lambert, JE, Traveset, A, Wright, SJ and Böhning-Gaese, K (2012) Meta-analysis of the effects of human disturbance on seed dispersal by animals. Conservation Biology 26, 10721081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazer, SJ and Wheelwright, NT (1993) Fruit size and shape: allometry at different taxonomic levels in bird-dispersed plants. Evolutionary Ecology 7, 556575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melin, AD, Chiou, KL, Walco, ER, Bergstrom, ML, Kawamura, S and Fedigan, LM (2017) Trichromacy increases fruit intake rates of wild capuchins (Cebus capucinus imitator). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 1040210407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michalski, F and Peres, CA (2005) Anthropogenic determinants of primate and carnivore local extinctions in a fragmented forest landscape of southern Amazonia. Biological Conservation 124, 383396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monasterio, M and Sarmiento, G (1976) Phenological strategies of plant species in the tropical savanna and the semi-deciduous forest of the Venezuelan Llanos. Journal of Biogeography 3, 325355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obregón, JR (2007) Comparación de la cantidad y el tipo de semillas dispersadas por Cebus apella y Alouatta seniculus en un bosque fragmentado, San Martín, Meta. Undergraduate thesis, Departmento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Los Andes.Google Scholar
Peres, CA (1993) Notes on the primates of the Juruá River, western Brazilian Amazonia. Folia Primatologica 61, 97103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peres, CA and Roosmalen, MV (2002) Primate frugivory in two species-rich neotropical forests: implications for the demography of large-seeded plants in overhunted areas. In Levey DJ, Silva WR and Galetti M (eds.), Third International Symposium-Workshop on Frugivores and Seed Dispersal. Oxon: CABI Publishing, pp. 407–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulsen, JR, Clark, CJ, Connor, EF and Smith, TB (2002) Differential resource use by primates and hornbills: implications for seed dispersal. Ecology 83, 228240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramírez, MA and Stevenson, PR (2020) Fruit production needed to maintain populations of woolly monkeys: recommendations for reintroduction projects. Global Ecology and Conservation 21, e00817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, GAC and Boher, S (1988) Notes on the biology of Cebus nigrivittatus and Alouatta seniculus in northern Venezuela. Primate Conservation 9, 6166.Google Scholar
Rosin, C and Poulsen, JR (2016) Hunting-induced defaunation drives increased seed predation and decreased seedling establishment of commercially important tree species in an Afrotropical forest. Forest Ecology and Management 382, 206213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RStudio Team (2020) RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R v1.3.1093.Google Scholar
Sales, L, Culot, L and Pires, MM (2020) Climate niche mismatch and the collapse of primate seed dispersal services in the Amazon. Biological Conservation 247, 108628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandino, LI (2006) Flórula de leguminosas de San Martín, Meta. Undergraduate thesis, Departmento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Los Andes.Google Scholar
Smith, RJ and Jungers, WL (1997) Body mass in comparative primatology. Journal of Human Evolution 32, 523559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevenson, PR (2000) Seed dispersal by woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagothricha) at Tinigua National Park, Colombia: dispersal distance, germination rates, and dispersal quantity. American Journal of Primatology 50, 275289.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevenson, PR (2007) Estimates of the number of seeds dispersed by a population of primates in a lowland forest in western Amazonia. In Dennis, AJ, Schupp, EW, Green, RJ and Westcott, DA (eds.), Seed Dispersal: Theory and its Application in a Changing World. Oxfordshire: CABI Publishing, pp. 340362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, PR and Aldana, AM (2008) Potential effects of ateline extinction and forest fragmentation on plant diversity and composition in the western Orinoco Basin, Colombia. International Journal of Primatology 29, 365377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, PR, Cardona, L, Cárdenas, S and Link, A (2021a) Oilbirds disperse large seeds at longer distance than extinct megafauna. Scientific Reports 11, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevenson, PR, Castellanos, MC, Pizarro, JC and Garavito, M (2002) Effects of seed dispersal by three Ateline monkey species on seed germination at Tinigua National Park, Colombia. International Journal of Primatology 23, 11871204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, PR, Defler, TR, de la Torre, S, Moscoso, P, Palacios, E, Ravetta, AL, Vermeer, J, Link, A, Urbani, B, Cornejo, FM, Guzmán-Caro, DC, Shanee, S, Mourthé, Í, Muniz, CC, Wallace, RB and Rylands, AB (2021b) Lagothrix lagothricha (amended version of 2020 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021:e.T160881218A192309103. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-1.RLTS.T160881218A192309103.en (accessed on 23 January 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, PR, Pineda, M and Samper, T (2005) Influence of seed size on dispersal patterns of woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagothricha) at Tinigua Park, Colombia. Oikos 110, 435440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, PR, Quiñones, MJ and Ahumada, JA (1994) Ecological strategies of woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagothricha) at Tinigua National Park, Colombia. American Journal of Primatology 32, 123140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevenson, PR, Quiñones, MJ and Ahumada, JA (2000) Influence of fruit availability on ecological overlap among four Neotropical primates at Tinigua National Park, Colombia. Biotropica 32, 533544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terborgh, J, Nuñez-Iturri, G, Pitman, NC, Valverde, FHC, Alvarez, P, Swamy, V, Pringle, EG and Paine, CE (2008) Tree recruitment in an empty forest. Ecology 89, 17571768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, BC, Sork, VL, Leong, MT and Smith, TB (2007) Hunting of mammals reduces seed removal and dispersal of the Afrotropical tree Antrocaryon klaineanum (Anacardiaceae). Biotropica 39, 340347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, BC and Hammerschmidt, K (2013) Proximate factors underpinning receiver responses to deceptive false alarm calls in wild tufted capuchin monkeys: is it counter deception? American Journal of Primatology 75, 715725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, RE, Webb, SE, Dubreuil, C, Lopez, R, Hernandez, SC, Fedigan, LM and Melin, AD (2021) Sharing spaces: niche differentiation in diet and substrate use among wild capuchins. Animal Behaviour 179, 317338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zambrano, VAB, Moncada, JZ and Stevenson, PR (2008) Diversity of regenerating plants and seed dispersal in two canopy trees from Colombian Amazon forests with different hunting pressure. International Journal of Tropical Biology 56, 15311542.Google Scholar
Zarate-Caicedo, DA and Stevenson, PR (2014) Ecological strategies of woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagothricha) in a forest fragment (Guaviare, Colombia). In Defler, T and Stevenson, PR (eds.), The Woolly Monkey: Behavior, Ecology, Systematics, and Captive Research. New York: Springer, pp. 227245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Body mass, per cent of fruit in diet, other food items, and IUCN Red List status of Lagothrix lagothricha, Alouatta seniculus, and Sapajus apella

Figure 1

Figure 1. Satellite images of a. Rey Zamuro and b. Santa Rosa outlined in yellow. The forest outlined in orange within the sites is where the study groups live. The study sites are ∼23 km apart. Images are from Google Earth (Google 2022).

Figure 2

Table 2. The sample size and species richness of all seeds and large- and very large-seeded species, and the range of seed widths of the dispersed seeds for Lagothrix lagothricha, Alouatta seniculus, and Sapajus apella. The faecal samples for L. lagothricha are from Rey Zamuro (November 2018 to March 2020) and for A. seniculus and S. apella are from Santa Rosa (September to December 2006), both located in Meta, Colombia

Figure 3

Table 3. Comparisons in the median seed width dispersed by Lagothrix lagothricha (Ll), Alouatta seniculus (As), and Sapajus apella (Sa) across species, within species among adult males (M), adult females (F), and juveniles (J), and post hoc comparisons. Represented is the U statistic and p-value. In bold are significant results (p < 0.003). For the results of the analysis excluding seeds < 1.1 mm, refer to Appendix S3. Sample sizes, equal to the number of seeds dispersed, are as follows: L. lagothricha (total: 4017, adult males: 360, adult females: 3455, juveniles: 202), A. seniculus (total: 3960, adult males: 1595, adult females: 1898, juveniles: 467), S. apella (total: 45462, adult males: 20511, adult females: 24469, juveniles: 482)

Figure 4

Figure 2. Boxplots of the widths (mm) of seeds dispersed by each species (Lagothrix lagothricha: N = 4032 seeds, Alouatta seniculus: N = 3960, Sapajus apella: N = 45462) and age/sex class (adult males, adult females, juveniles). These boxplots do not include Dipteryx micrantha (20 mm), as this species was excluded from this analysis. The faecal samples for L. lagothricha are from Rey Zamuro (November 2018 to March 2020) and for A. seniculus and S. apella are from Santa Rosa (September to December 2006), both located in Meta, Colombia. Line: median, box: interquartile range, points: outliers, defined as greater than 1.5 times the interquartile range away from the first or third quartile. Note that due to the large number of small seeds in the faeces of adult S. apella, the interquartile range is much smaller than for other species and age/sex classes and thus appears as a line in the figure. Under each species name is the range of seed sizes (included in the statistical analyses) it dispersed and next to each age/sex class is the number of individuals sampled. The dotted lines represent the thresholds for ‘large’ and ‘very large’ seeds used in this study: ≥ 5.9, > 7.5). For the results of the analysis excluding seeds < 1.1 mm, refer to Appendix S3.

Figure 5

Table 4. Comparisons of the number of large (≥5.9 mm wide) and very large (>7.5 mm) seeds dispersed per faecal sample among Lagothrix lagothricha (Ll), Alouatta seniculus (As), and Sapajus apella (Sa) and adult male (M), adult female (F), and juvenile (J) age/sex classes. Represented is the mean and 99.8 per cent confidence intervals of the maximum likelihood estimate of the Poisson parameter λ. Sample sizes, equal to the number of faecal samples collected, are as follows: L. lagothricha (total: 187, adult males: 35, adult females: 119, juveniles: 33), A. seniculus (total: 57, adult males: 24, adult females: 24, juveniles: 9), S. apella (total: 110, adult males: 50, adult females: 36, juveniles: 24)

Supplementary material: File

Norford et al. supplementary material

Norford et al. supplementary material

Download Norford et al. supplementary material(File)
File 567.1 KB