Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:09:46.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Service provision for gender dysphoria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Annie McCloud*
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2003

Sir: I was pleased to read the article by Murjan, Shepherd, and Ferguson (Psychiatric Bulletin, June 2002, 26, 210-212), highlighting the variability of services available for the assessment of individuals with gender dysphoria.

However, I am concerned that their conclusions are not supported by the data provided. They state that “most trans-sexual people have access to NHS services for the treatment of gender dysphoria”. The results presented are that 79/120 (65%) health authorities replied to the survey confirming that they had a commissioning policy, either from local or recognised national centres. It is not stated whether patients were actually referred or seen within a reasonable amount of time. At least one health authority imposes a 5 year “residency criterion” in their area for referral to a specialist service, despite the High Court ruling in A, D and G.

The article offers no evidence base for their description of a “full” service, or whether such services as are provided are effective. Worryingly, the authors refer to the 5th edition of the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association (HBIGDA) Standards of Care for Gender Identity Disorders (1998), which differs significantly from the current 6th edition (2001).

The authors infer that there is a need for a standardised treatment approach across Great Britain, and attribute the negative experiences of patients using specialist gender identity services to inadequate commissioning of local services. Neither inference is justified by the data presented. The implicit call for uniformity is at odds with the HBIGDA standards of care, and potentially wasteful of resources.

References

Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association (1998) The Standards of Care for Gender Identity Disorders, 5th Edition. Dusseldorf: Symposion Press.Google Scholar
Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association (2001) The Standards of Care for Gender Identity Disorders, 6th Edition. Düsseldorf: Symposion Press.Google Scholar
Murjan, S., Shepard, M., Ferguson, B. G. (2002) What services are available for the treatment of transsexuals in Great Britain? Psychiatric Bulletin, 26, 210212.Google Scholar
A, Dand G v NW Lancashire Health Authority, Court of Appeal 29 July 1999, Case Nos. QBC1999/0226/4, 0228/4,0230/4.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.