This paper presents a methodology for assessment
of diagnosability of mechanical and hydraulic systems.
The method is developed on the basis of relationships between
system performance parameters and physical objects, that
is, components of the system. These relationships are identified
by system functional domain and are modeled in terms of
a bipartite graph, called Diagnosability Bipartite Graph
(DBG). A matrix called Diagnosability Matrix (DM) represents
the DBG. Various diagnosability parameters of the system
are derived from the DBG and the DM and these are useful
in evaluation and comparison of design variants of the
system. These parameters: are maximum number of set conflicts
(MNS), maximum number of components in a set conflict (MNCS),
diagnosability effort and cost (DEC), and average merit
of diagnosability (AMD). The design having the lowest value
of MNCS, AMD, and DEC; and highest value of MNS has the
highest diagnosability. On the basis of these, a best design
alternative is selected from diagnosability point of view.
Moreover, components, which have poor diagnosability, are
also identified. Maximum number of set conflicts (MNS)
also guides in system fault diagnosis. The proposed procedure
aids in the design and development of maintainable systems
from diagnosability consideration. The method can also
be used for evaluating and comparing the diagnosability
of the systems. This method is illustrated with the help
of two examples.