Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:40:53.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The wasting continuum in heart failure: from sarcopenia to cachexia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2015

Stephan von Haehling*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University of Göttingen Medical School, Göttingen, Germany Department of Cardiology, Charité Medical School, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
*
Corresponding author: Dr S. von Haehling, fax +49 551 39 20918, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sarcopenia (muscle wasting) and cachexia share some pathophysiological aspects. Sarcopenia affects approximately 20 %, cachexia <10 % of ambulatory patients with heart failure (HF). Whilst sarcopenia means loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength that predominantly affects postural rather than non-postural muscles, cachexia means loss of muscle and fat tissue that leads to weight loss. The wasting continuum in HF implies that skeletal muscle is lost earlier than fat tissue and may lead from sarcopenia to cachexia. Both tissues require conservation, and therapies that stop the wasting process have tremendous therapeutic appeal. The present paper reviews the pathophysiology of muscle and fat wasting in HF and discusses potential treatments, including exercise training, appetite stimulants, essential amino acids, growth hormone, testosterone, electrical muscle stimulation, ghrelin and its analogues, ghrelin receptor agonists and myostatin antibodies.

Type
Conference on ‘Nutrition and age-related muscle loss, sarcopenia and cachexia’
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2015 

A large number of answers are possible for a patient who complains about difficulty in rising from a chair( Reference Morley, von Haehling and Anker 1 ). Indeed, a decrease in skeletal muscle mass starts after age 40 years, and this decrease is usually more pronounced in the lower than the upper limbs( Reference Janssen, Heymsfield and Wang 2 ). The differential diagnosis therefore depends largely on the patient's age, because with advancing age, the likelihood of sarcopenia increases progressively( Reference Morley, Anker and von Haehling 3 ). The term sarcopenia, literally meaning ‘poverty of flesh’, was coined in 1989( Reference Rosenberg 4 ). Since then, interest in the field was predominantly spearheaded by geriatricians whose patients are by far most frequently affected. Cardiologists became interested in the field of tissue wasting with the publication of the original prognostic paper on cardiac cachexia, which was published in 1997 by Anker et al. ( Reference Anker, Ponikowski and Varney 5 ), even though the term had appeared in the literature for much longer( Reference Doehner and Anker 6 ). It is important to understand that sarcopenia and cachexia are, although overlapping, still different clinical entities. Whilst sarcopenia affects only skeletal muscle and, by definition, appears only without chronic disease being present as a phenomenon of ‘healthy ageing’( Reference von Haehling, Morley and Anker 7 , Reference Alchin 8 ), cachexia can, by definition, only become apparent in the context of chronic illness (Table 1). Sarcopenia means loss of functioning skeletal muscle through denervation, replacement by adipose tissue or other meachnisms; the original definition implied ‘involuntary loss of skeletal muscle mass and consequently of strength’( Reference Roubenoff, Heymsfield and Kehayias 9 ), which is logical, because sarcopenia predominantly affects postural rather than non-postural muscles( Reference Narici and Maffulli 10 ). It has been argued that the assessment of muscle strength may be more suitable in men using hand grip strength assessment, whilst in women knee extension strength could be more appropriate( Reference Barbat-Artigas, Plouffe and Pion 11 ). In comparison, cachexia means loss of any tissue that leads to involuntary weight loss. To phrase it very simply: cachexia can easily be diagnosed using only weighing scales; a diagnosis of sarcopenia requires more sophisticated technology( Reference von Haehling, Steinbeck and Doehner 14 ). This is particularly true even though a number of screening tools have been developed( Reference Goodman, Ghate and Mavros 12 , Reference Villani, Miller and Cameron 13 ); however these have not become routine clinical practice yet.

Table 1. Definitions and prevalence of sarcopenia and cachexia in heart failure

Sarcopenia is a phenomenon associated with the ageing process but chronic disease may still exacerbate this process( Reference Anker, Coats and Morley 15 ). The ageing process per se is associated with loss of skeletal muscle of approximately 1–2 % per year( Reference Abellan van Kan 16 , Reference Doherty 17 ). Sarcopenia affects 5–13 % of the subjects aged 60–70 years and up to 50 % of all octogenerians( Reference Morley, Anker and von Haehling 3 , Reference von Haehling, Morley and Anker 7 , Reference Morley, Kim and Haren 18 ). To avoid misinterpretation, I prefer the term muscle wasting over sarcopenia, when chronic disease is present, even though this point is a matter of on-going debate( Reference Anker, Coats and Morley 15 , Reference Fearon, Evans and Anker 19 ). Recent data from the studies investigating co-morbidities aggravating heart failure have shown that 19·5 % of all ambulatory patients with heart failure (HF) are affected by muscle wasting( Reference Fülster, Tacke and Sandek 20 ). The prevalence of cachexia is lower, and usually patients lose muscle first, adipose tissue only later, and this is when weight loss becomes apparent( Reference Anker, Ponikowski and Clark 21 , Reference Farkas, von Haehling and Kalantar-Zadeh 22 ). In patients with HF, muscle wasting remains an independent predictor of reduced exercise capacity as assessed using spiroergometry, even after adjusting for a large number of clinically relevant parameters( Reference Fülster, Tacke and Sandek 20 ).

No therapy has been approved or is being advocated for the treatment of muscle wasting other than exercise training( Reference Ebner, Elsner and Springer 23 ). This is not only true for HF, but also for advanced cancer. Similarly, no treatment is available for cachexia, even though a large number of drugs have been tested in clinical trials and the presence of cachexia has tremendous impact on patients’ everyday lives( Reference Hopkinson 24 , Reference Wanger, Foster and Nguyen 25 ). Most studies, however, were undertaken in patients with cancer, in whom cachexia is most prominent( Reference Vaughan, Martin and Lewandowski 26 ). Only few studies were done in patients with HF even though exercise capacity has been improved by several means. A thorough understanding of molecular pathways involved in the process of muscle wasting is crucial to identify targets for therapeutic interventions( Reference Argilés, Fontes-Oliveira and Toledo 27 , Reference Yoshida and Delafontaine 28 ). Cachexia therapies, on the other hand, are aimed primarily at increasing body weight and thus at increasing muscle and fat tissue. Since any β-blocker can increase fat mass, this target appears easier to be reached than an increase in muscle mass, but this is true only at first sight. One of the reasons for the difficulties in increasing fat mass is, for example, the lack of appetite, i.e. anorexia that usually accompanies cachexia in many patients. Anorexia hampers the provision of the necessary energy required to increase or at least stabilise body weight. To make it again very simple: muscle means motion and therefore quality of life, fat is used only later for energy maintenance and this also means that loss of fat is associated with reduced survival. The distinction ‘muscle equals motion and fat equals survival’ has a lot of appeal for being catchy; however, it may be oversimplified. Indeed, it more describes a progressive process of tissue wasting in the course of chronic disease, and both tissues require conservation. It is therefore worthwhile to start all treatments as soon as muscle loss develops; or even before that. The aim of the present paper is to describe wasting as a continuing process of HF and to provide a brief overview of mechanisms and possible treatment approaches to tissue wasting in affected patients.

Mechanisms of wasting: skeletal muscle

Muscle loss during the ageing process

Narici and Maffulli calculated that total lean mass, which approximately equals the total skeletal muscle mass but is easier to measure, declines by about 18 % in men and by 27 % in women from the second to the eighth decade of life( Reference Narici and Maffulli 10 ). The development of sarcopenia has been implicated in several detrimental effects that are commonly encountered in the elderly( Reference Dirks and Leeuwenburgh 29 ): (i) increased incidence of falls that can lead to injury; (ii) impaired immune function and capability to fight off infection as a consequence of reduced protein storage in skeletal muscle; and (iii) development of disability, frailty and ultimately death( Reference Wanger, Foster and Nguyen 25 , Reference Malmstrom, Miller and Herning 30 ). In fact, it has been estimated that the annual healthcare cost in the USA due to sarcopenia-related morbidity reaches 18·5 billion US dollar( Reference Janssen, Samson and Meeuwsen 31 , Reference Janssen, Baumgartner and Ross 32 ). A fundamental difference, however, exists between disuse atrophy and ageing-associated sarcopenia, because only sarcopenia is associated with a decrease in muscle fibre size and number. Atrophy, on the other hand, is only associated with a decrease in muscle fibre size, but not number. Many different mechanisms are involved in these processes. To understand them, knowledge of the basics of skeletal muscle structure is pivotal. Indeed, muscle consists of slow twitch type I and fast twitch type II muscle fibres. Whilst type I fibres are more efficient at using oxygen for continuous, extended muscle contractions, type II fibres possess less mitochondria and preferably use anaerobic metabolism to create energy( Reference von Haehling, Steinbeck and Doehner 14 , Reference Muiller-Hocker 33 ).

The first description of different muscle fibre types dates back to 1873, when Louis Ranvier described red and white muscles in rabbits and rays as either tonic-slow or tetanic-fast, respectively( Reference Ranvier 34 ). Red muscles, now known to be primarily composed of type I fibres, possess high oxidative capacity due to high mitochondrial density, high myoglobin content and a high number of capillaries( Reference Hultman 35 ). Their metabolic profile is adjusted to their long twitch contraction time and their low force production, which also makes them resistant to fatigue. In addition, type I fibres show low activity of ATPase, creatine kinase and glycolytic enzymes. Their activating motor neurons are small( Reference Hultman 35 ). In this context, it is important to acknowledge that mitochondria produce about 90 % of ATP required for cellular functioning during oxidative phosphorylation( Reference Dirks and Leeuwenburgh 29 ). Type II fibres are different in many ways. Not only are they activated by larger motoneurons, which means that the level of excitation will determine the pool of neurons and thus the fibre type that will contract, but they also possess high ATPase, creatine kinase and anaerobic glycolysis activity.  Further, type II fibres are differentiated into type IIA and IIB fibres, which have different oxidative capacities( Reference Hultman 35 ). The fibre composition of any muscle can be subject to change in response to appropriate stimuli; for example, reduced muscular activity will yield slow-to-fast fibre transformation( Reference Daugaard and Richter 36 ). The opposite transformation appears during exercise training. During the ageing process, fast type II are more prone to atrophy than type I fibres, and indeed, cross sectional area of type II fibres has been shown to be reduced by 26 % in subjects aged 80 years compared with subjects who were aged 20 years( Reference Lexell, Taylor and Sjöström 37 ). No such reduction was reported for slow type I fibres. One of the reasons for this change is the preferential denervation and loss of fast motor units( Reference Lexell 38 ). The number of motor units remains fairly constant up to age 60 years, but declines thereafter at a rate of 3 % annually( Reference Campbell, McComas and Petito 39 ), amounting to 60 % loss at age 80 years( Reference Narici and Maffulli 10 ). Altogether it appears that up to the late seventies, type II fibres are predominantly affected, but from approximately age 80 years onwards, both types of fibres are lost( Reference Narici and Maffulli 10 ).

Several other factors play roles in declining muscle mass and strength (Fig. 1). The infiltration of skeletal muscle by fat and connctive tissue is another major contributor( Reference Borkan, Hults and Gerzof 40 ). Overend et al. ( Reference Overend, Cunningham and Paterson 41 ) described more than 20 years ago that, even though total thigh cross-sectional area is not different between young and elderly men, older men have 13 % lower total muscle plus bone area, 26 % lower quadriceps and 18 % lower hamstring area. Using computed tomography imaging, Taaffe et al. ( Reference Taaffe, Henwood and Nalls 42 ) recently described that cessation of resistance exercise in trained older persons increases the fatty infiltration of muscle, while resumption of exercise decreases it. This effect adds to the development of mitochondrial dysfunction that is evident in the elderly and possibly a consequence of oxidative damage by reactive oxygen species( Reference Dirks and Leeuwenburgh 29 , Reference Cadenas and Davies 43 ); reduced energy production may also play a role in the development of myocyte apoptosis discussed later( Reference Pollack and Leeuwenburgh 44 ). In fact, animal models have shown that the ATP content in aged muscle may be 50 % lower than that of young counterparts( Reference Drew, Phaneuf and Dirks 45 ).

Fig. 1. (Colour online) The wasting continuum in heart failure (HF). Mitochondrial dysfunction, infiltration by fat and connective tissue, muscle fibre transformation, denervation of fast type fibres and myocyte apoptosis all play a role in muscle wasting (sarcopenia) that develops early in HF. Overactivity of the ubiquitin–proteasome system leads to myofibril degeneration. Cachexia is less prevalent than muscle wasting. It is associated with muscle and adipose tissue wasting; osteoporosis affects up to 50 % of patients but has been studied least well in HF.

An anabolic/catabolic imbalance is another important player in the development of sarcopenia. From this perspective, muscle loss may be a consequence of reduced muscle anabolism, increased muscle catabolism or both( Reference von Haehling, Steinbeck and Doehner 14 ). Such imbalance may yield histological changes in the muscles’ ultrastructure, finally leading to increased degradation of myofibrils and myocyte apoptosis. Indeed, TNF has been shown to be able to induce myocyte apoptosis( Reference Narici and Maffulli 10 ), but is also able to stimulate myofibril degradation via the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway( Reference von Haehling, Genth-Zotz and Anker 46 ). Therefore, the balance between anabolic players such as testosterone, growth hormone or insulin-like growth factor-1 and the catabolic factors TNF, IL-1β, interferon-γ, myostatin or glucocorticoids is of major importance in this regard( Reference von Haehling, Steinbeck and Doehner 14 ). Lack of anabolic growth factors inside of skeletal muscles and reduced physical activity have also been found to be involved in an increased rate of apoptosis( Reference Barton-Davis, Shoturma and Sweeney 47 ). Interestingly, apoptosis activity has been shown to inversely relate to muscle weight, suggesting a causative relationship( Reference Dirks and Leeuwenburgh 29 ). The predominant mechanism of myofibril degradation involves the adenosine triphosphate-dependent ubiquitin–proteasome pathway, which is responsible for the degradation of myofibril proteins from the intracellular compartment. However, it appears that an overactivity of this pathway does not play a major role in the development of sarcopenia in healthy elderly subjects, whereas it does play a prominent role in patients with chronic inflammatory syndromes such as HF( Reference Narici and Maffulli 10 , Reference Murton, Constantin and Greenhaff 48 ).

Muscle loss in heart failure

Peripheral loss of skeletal muscle tissue is a general finding in patients with HF and occurs early in the course of the disease( Reference Loncar, Fülster and von Haehling 49 ). Muscle mass is the major determinant of both resting energy expenditure( Reference Tacke, Ebner and Boschmann 50 ) and exercise capacity( Reference Cicoira, Zanolla and Franceschini 51 ). The muscle hypothesis( Reference Coats 52 ) holds that many factors are involved in the development of reduced peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) in HF. Besides physical inactivity, the muscle itself is affected by ultrastructural abnormalities, alterations in mitochondrial structure and function, oxidative stress and a shift in fibre distribution( Reference von Haehling, Steinbeck and Doehner 14 , Reference Sullivan, Green and Cobb 53 ). All these factors play a role not only in the reduced exercise capapcity in patients with HF, but also in the development of sarcopenia. Among male non-cachectic patients with HF, lean tissue in the legs was reduced by 9·1 % compared with healthy male control subjects of similar age( Reference Anker, Ponikowski and Clark 21 ). The thirty-six patients with HF in the present study were (mean (sem)) age 58·9 (1·3) years, weighed 83·8 (2·0) kg, their mean New York Heart Association class was 2·7 (0·1), and their mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 25 (2)%. Study participants’ total lean tissue was 57·4 (1·0) kg( Reference Anker, Ponikowski and Clark 21 ). However, patients in the present study were not investigated for the presence or absence of sarcopenia. A later study from my group in a significantly larger cohort of patients from the studies investigating co-morbidities aggravating heart failure, conducted among 200 male and female patients with stable ambulatory HF (mean (sd), age 66·9 (10·4) years, weight 86·7 (16·9) kg, New York Heart Association class 2·3 (0·5), left ventricular ejection fraction 38·9 (13·5) %) found that the patients’ mean lean mass was 54·6 (10·8) kg and thus similar to that seen in the study published one and half decades earlier( Reference Fülster, Tacke and Sandek 20 ). The prevalence of sarcopenia in the present study was 19·5 %, and thus too high to be simply attributed to advanced age, since these patients had, on average, not reached 70 years. Sarcopenia, however, was associated with lower hand grip strength, lower quadriceps strength, lower gait speed and 6-min walk distance as well as lower left ventricular ejection fraction and peak oxygen consumption as assessed using spiroergometry( Reference Fülster, Tacke and Sandek 20 ).

Previous studies had studied skeletal muscle mass and came to different conclusions, because no strigent cut-off criteria for sarcopenia were used. Rather, the respective authors described skeletal muscle mass reduction per se. Mancini et al. ( Reference Mancini, Walter and Reichek 54 ), for example, found that 68 % of their fifteen patients with chronic HF had reduced skeletal muscle mass compared with healthy controls, as evidenced by a decrease in the creatinine: height ratio and/or a reduced upper arm circumference of <5 % of normal. Using MRI, the authors also demonstrated that the patients’ calf muscle volume was reduced, whereas fat mass was largely preserved( Reference Mancini, Walter and Reichek 54 ). Drexler et al. ( Reference Drexler, Riede and Münzel 55 ) studied fifty-seven patients with chronic HF and eighteen healthy control subjects and found that patients with HF had by 20 % reduced density of mitochondria in their skeletal muscle. Imprtantly, the fibre-type distribution was shifted towards type II fibres in patients with HF and their capillary length density of skeletal muscle was also reduced( Reference Drexler, Riede and Münzel 55 ). Most importantly, the density of mitochondria was strongly associated with the patients’ peak oxygen consumption( Reference Drexler, Riede and Münzel 55 ). Using quadriceps biopsies from nine patients with severe chronic HF, Lipkin et al. ( Reference Lipkin, Jones and Round 56 ) found increased acid phosphatase, increased interstitial cellularity, excess intracellular lipid accumulation, atrophy of both type I and II fibres and variation in size with hypertrophy and atrophy of fibres. Completing the pathophysiological portfolio of sarcopenia development in HF, increased skeletal myocyte apoptosis has been observed in affected patients( Reference Vescovo and Dalla Libera 57 ). Adams et al. ( Reference Adams, Jiang and Yu 58 ) studied thirty-four patients with mild-to-moderate chronic HF and detected apoptosis in skeletal muscle biopsies from the vastus lateralis muscle in sixteen of these patients (47 %). Patients with skeletal muscle apoptosis showed significantly lower peak oxygen consumption as assessed by spiroergometry (12·0 (sd 3·7) v. 18·2 (sd 4·4) ml/kg per min, P = 0·0005). Lower peak VO2 was also described when Harrington et al. ( Reference Harrington, Anker and Chua 59 ) studied 100 patients with chronic HF and compared them with thirty-one healthy controls (18 (sd 0·6) v. 33·3 (sd 1·4) ml/min per kg, P < 0·0001). Computed tomography-measured cross-sectional area in the quadriceps at mid-thigh and in the total leg were lower in patients with HF than in controls (both P < 0·05). Overall, patients were weaker than the control subjects as assessed by quadriceps maximal isometric strength (P < 0·005), even after correcting strength for the cross-sectional area( Reference Sullivan, Green and Cobb 53 ).

Just as in patients with ageing-associated sarcopenia, mitochondria-released cytochrome c has been implicated in the development of muscle wasting in HF( Reference Vescovo and Dalla Libera 57 ). Cytochrome c release into the cytosol is a consequence of the intracellular balance of the regulatory proteins Bax (pro-apoptotic) and Bcl-2 (anti-apoptotic). Cytochrome c release in turn activates caspase-9, which initiates a cascade of events that leads to apoptosis( Reference Dirks and Leeuwenburgh 29 ). Gielen et al. ( Reference Gielen, Sandri and Kozarez 60 ) have recently shown that MuRF-1 expression in vastus lateralis muscle biopsies was elevated among sixty patients with chronic HF when compared with sixty healthy controls of similar age, suggesting clinically relevant activation of the ubiquitin–proteasome system, for which MuRF-1 acts as an important transcription factor. Subjects were randomised to 4 weeks supervised endurance exercise training or a control group. Exercise training reduced the expression of MuRF-1 mRNA by more than 30 % in a repeat biopsy at 4 weeks follow-up( Reference von Haehling, Steinbeck and Doehner 14 , Reference Anker, Ponikowski and Clark 21 ). Other local factors appear to play important roles in HF as well as evidenced by reduced expression of local skeletal muscle expression of the anabolic insulin-like growth factor-1( Reference Hambrecht, Schulze and Gielen 61 ). As reviewed in detail elsewhere( Reference von Haehling, Steinbeck and Doehner 14 ), insulin-like growth factor-1 is a key regulator of protein kinase B, also known as Akt, whose downstream target is called mammalian target of rapamycin, a pivotal regulator of translation initiation and overall muscle size. It appears that basal protein kinase B phosphorylation is decreased in patients with HF compared with age- and physical-activity-matched controls( Reference Toth, Ward and van der Velden 62 ). Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF do not only play a role in the induction of proteasome-activity and apoptosis, but they can also induce a state of growth hormone resistance( Reference Cicoira, Kalra and Anker 63 ). Indeed, many pro-inflammatory mediators have been shown to be overexpressed in patients with HF( Reference Anker and von Haehling 64 ) and their levels are associated with poor survival( Reference Ferrari, Bachetti and Confortini 65 , Reference Rauchhaus, Doehner and Francis 66 ). Ventricular assist device implantation in patients with advanced HF has been shown to enhance skeletal muscle expression of insulin-like growth factor-1, to increase protein kinase B phosphorylation, and to increase the fibre cross-sectional area( Reference Khawaja, Chokshi and Ji 67 ).

Mechanisms of wasting: fat

Fat tissue wasting in HF has been far less extensively studied than muscle wasting. Using a highly selected group of hospitalised patients with HF, Melenovsky et al. ( Reference Melenovsky, Kotrc and Borlaug 68 ) found that fat wasting was more prevalent among patients with right than left ventricular dysfunction. Indeed, fat-mass index was 6·7 (sd 3·9) v. 7·8 (sd 3·6) kg/m2 (P= 0·005), respectively. This was also true for absolute fat mass as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan (25 (sd 10) v. 30 (sd 11) kg, P = 0·002). No such difference was found for fat-free mass index (P = 0·21) or absolute fat lean mass (54 (sd 9) v. 55 (sd 10) kg, P = 0·64), suggesting aequivalent muscle loss in the two groups. Christensen et al. ( Reference Christensen, Kistorp and Schou 69 ) followed thirty-eight patients with chronic HF, nineteen of whom were cachectic, for 12 months and found that neither group showed a difference in absolute lean mass from baseline to 12 months; however, a statistically significant increase in fat mass was noted in the cachectic subgroup (from 15·7 (sd 1·6) to 17·1 (sd 1·6) kg, P < 0·05), but not in the non-cachectic subgroup. Percentage lean mass decreased in the cachectic subgroup from baseline to follow-up. It is noteworthy that fat mass in both groups was rather at the low end of the spectrum in the first place and also that the change in fat mass was not linked to an increase in body weight, possibly related to a relative decrease in muscle mass. It remains a matter of speculation why and when fat loss becomes evident in patients with HF, but it seems that natriuretic peptides, pro-inflammatory cytokines and possibly catecholamines play a role. Indeed, both sarcopenic and cachectic patients have been found to present with lower fat mass in cross-sectional studies( Reference Fülster, Tacke and Sandek 20 , Reference Anker, Ponikowski and Clark 21 ). From a pathophysiological standpoint, natriuretic peptides such as atrial and B-type natriuretic peptide have been implicated in lipolysis, as adipocytes are sensitive to both peptides( Reference Szabó, Postrach and Mähler 70 ). In addition, natriuretic peptides have been shown to enhance the secretion of adiponectin from adipocytes( Reference Tanaka, Tsutamoto and Sakai 71 ).

Adiponectin is an adipose tissue-derived factor that appears to improve insulin sensitivity and inhibit vascular inflammation( Reference Lyon, Law and Hsueh 72 ). Even though adiponectin is primarily produced by adipose tissue, human plasma adiponectin levels show, counterintuitively, an inverse relation with BMI and percentage body fat( Reference Arita, Kihara and Ouchi 73 ). Therefore, it has been suggested that adiponectin secretion could aid in weight loss, which in the setting of HF could be considered as a cardiac unloading action( Reference Loncar, Fülster and von Haehling 49 ). Conversely, Lavie et al. ( Reference Lavie, Osman and Milani 74 ) studied 209 ambulatory patients with chronic HF who were referred for a cardiac rehabilitation programme, showing that the total fat is a strong and independent predictor of event-free survival. For every 1 % of absolute increase in percentage body fat in this population, there was a reduction in major clinical events. Improved survival is therefore consistently associated with higher BMI, and this, in turn, is linked to body fat in patients with HF.

Altogether, it appears that fat loss occurs predominantly late in the course of HF and that it plays an important role in the development of cachexia. Both patients with sarcopenia and cachexia present with lower fat mass in cross-sectional studies, but longitudinal studies suggest that alterations are possible and that increases in fat mass are possible but associated with decreases in muscle mass. Patients with right ventricular failure are more prone to develop fat loss than those with left ventricular failure.

Treatment approaches to wasting in heart failure

Muscle mass, muscle strength and musle wasting

It is important to understand that muscle wasting and fat wasting follow different pathophysiological pathways. Therefore, sarcopenia and cachexia may require different therapeutic approaches, even though these can show overlap to some extent. The only clinically meaningful therapeutic approach to muscle wasting in HF that has sufficient evidence is exercise training, because it is able to reduce oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory cytokine production, tissue expression of myostatin and the overall activity of the ubiquitin–proteasome system( Reference Gielen, Sandri and Kozarez 60 , Reference Lenk, Erbs and Höllriegel 75 Reference Smart and Steele 77 ). Exercise training is also being advocated for patients with cancer in order to improve their exercise capacity and quality of life( Reference Gould, Lahart and Carmichael 78 , Reference Sasso, Eves and Christensen 79 ). The present guidelines for HF management by the European Society of Cardiology state that ‘it is recommended that regular aerobic exercise is encouraged in patients with HF to improve functional capacity and symptoms( Reference McMurray, Adamopoulos and Anker 80 ). This is a class I recommendation with a level of evidence grade A as at least one randomised controlled study has proven its efficacy( Reference O'Connor, Whellan and Lee 81 ). Effects of exercise training include improved quality of life and exercise capacity and ultimately beneficial effects on mortality and hospitalisations( Reference Piepoli, Conraads and Corrà 82 ). Detailed recommendations can be found in a consensus statement issued by the European Society of Cardiology( Reference Piepoli, Conraads and Corrà 82 ).

A number of treatment approaches have been pursued for the treatment of muscle wasting and in order to increase muscle strength and exercise capacity in patients with HF( Reference Ebner, Elsner and Springer 83 , Reference Anker, von Haehling and Springer 84 ). No study has so far specifically investigated therapeutic effects in sarcopenic patients with HF, very few have studied cardiac cachexia. Interventions include essential amino acid supplementation in order to provide elements for the growth of skeletal muscle( Reference Wakabayashi and Sakuma 85 ), recombinant human growth hormone, synthetic ghrelin, testosterone replacement therapy, β-blockers, fish oil and β-receptor agonists( Reference Ebner, Elsner and Springer 83 ). Included patient cohorts, however, rarely exceeded fifty patients. Growth hormone application has seen tremendous trial acitivty in the past, but clinical benefit could not be demonstrated( Reference Osterziel, Strohm and Schuler 86 ). β-Receptor agonists have been tested in the management of muscle wasting( Reference Ryall and Lynch 87 Reference Toledo, Springer and Busquets 89 ), for example fenoterol or clenbuterol, but despite its pathophysiological attractiveness, this approach may be dangerous in patients with HF. Nutritional administration of essential amino acids appears to be promising, as an investigator-blinded, randomised study in thirty-eight patients with HF has shown that improvements in peak VO2 and 6-min walk distance are possible with this approach within 2 months of treatment( Reference Aquilani, Opasich and Gualco 90 ), but larger studies are required to confirm these results. Banerjee et al. ( Reference Banerjee, Caulfield and Crowe 91 ) used another interesting approach. testing the effects of electrical stimulation using a 6-week training programme during which patients were exposed to electrical stimulation of the major leg muscles for a minimum of 1 h, for 5 d each week. Peak VO2 increased from 19·5 (sd 3·5) to 21·2 (sd 5·1) ml/kg/min (P < 0·05), walking distance from 415 (sd 57) to 455 (sd 55) m (P < 0·005) and quadriceps strength increased from 378 (sd 110) to 405 (sd 109) N (P < 0·005). No change in BMI was noted( Reference Banerjee, Caulfield and Crowe 91 ).

Testosterone administration has been associated with improvements in exercise capacity, and, indeed, testosterone deficiency is a phenomenon that is frequently observed in patients with HF( Reference Volterrani, Rosano and Iellamo 92 ). Reduced serum levels are associated with muscle myopathy( Reference Josiak, Jankowska and Piepoli 93 ) as well as poor survival( Reference Jankowska, Biel and Majda 94 ). Caminiti et al. ( Reference Caminiti, Volterrani and Iellamo 95 ) studied seventy male patients with stable chronic HF, who were randomly assigned to reiceive either intramuscular injection of testosterone every 6 weeks or placebo (n 35 per group). Baseline peak VO2 was directly related to the serum testosterone level and improved significantly after 12 weeks of treatment from 13·4 ± 4·4 to 16·3 ± 1·7 ml/kg/min (P < 0·05). Likewise, testosterone-treated patients’ 6-min walk distance increased from 387 (sd 121) to 473 (sd 138) m (P < 0·05). Body weight increased from 63·5 (sd 13·7) to 66·8 (sd 11·4) kg (P < 0·05). No such change was noted in the placebo group( Reference Caminiti, Volterrani and Iellamo 95 ). A similar study from the same group of workers was published 1 year later, performed in thirty-six elderly female patients with chronic HF of ischaemic aetiology, twenty-four of whom were randomised to a testosterone transdermal patch or to placebo( Reference Iellamo, Volterrani and Caminiti 96 ). After 6 months treatment, their peak VO2 had increased from 10·5 (sd 1·0) to 13·2 (sd 1·8) ml/kg/min and their 6-min walk distance from 261 (sd 52) to 357 (sd 43) m (both P < 0·05). Altogether, testosterone therapy was well tolerated; only one patient left the study for generalised purigo. Virilisation was not noted in any of the patients( Reference Iellamo, Volterrani and Caminiti 96 ). A novel class of drugs, selective androgen receptor modulators, has recently received tremendous research endeavour for their ability to increase muscle mass in clinical studies; however, their effects on musle strength or exercise capacity are not yet convincing( Reference Takagi, Horie and Fujita 97 Reference Crawford, Dalton and Hancock 101 ). Studies in HF are not available.

Cachexia

Treatment studies to tackle cachexia and thus body rather than muscle wasting are different and require different approaches. Strategies include nutritional advice, appetite stimulants such as megestrol acetate, cyproheptadine and dronabinol anabolic steroids, ghrelin, or myostatin antibodies( Reference von Haehling, Lainscak and Springer 102 ). However, most experience stems from cancer cachexia studies, and studies into the treatment of cardiac cachexia remain a rarity. This is surprising, considering an estimated prevalence of 2 % for HF in European countries alone. Even though 80 % of these patients are at risk to develop cardiac cachexia, approximately only 10 % are in fact cachectic( Reference von Haehling and Anker 103 ). But even this comparatively low prevalence of cachexia translates into approximately 1·2 million patients with cardiac cachexia in Europe( Reference von Haehling and Anker 103 ). One small study evaluated the anabolic steroid oxymetholone, administered for 3 months at a dose of 5–10 mg daily to patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy; however, these patients were not cachectic. Treatment led to significant decreases in left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters and decreased left ventricular mass. Rozentryt et al. studied the effects of a nutritional intervention of 6 weeks duration in twenty-nine patients with cardiac cachexia( Reference Rozentryt, von Haehling and Lainscak 104 ). A diet containing 2512kJ (600 kcal)/d with relatively high fat content increased body weight during the treatment and the subsequent 12-week follow-up period and had anti-inflammatory effects in that it reduced serum levels of TNF. Patients’ quality of life of patients improved for the 6 weeks of the period of the nutritional intervention, but decreased somewhat in the follow-up period( Reference Rozentryt, von Haehling and Lainscak 104 ).

Ghrelin is a peptide hormone that was originally identified in 1999( Reference Kojima, Hosoda and Date 105 ) and is mainly produced in the fundus region of the stomach( Reference Date, Kojima and Hosoda 106 ), but also in other organs( Reference von Haehling, Lainscak and Springer 102 ). Ghrelin induces the release of growth hormone from the pituitary gland thereby regulating appetite, but it also has anti-inflammatory properties. Several studies in cancer have shown promising results( Reference Blum, Oberholzer and de Wolf-Linder 107 ). In patients with HF, ghrelin plasma levels are elevated in cachectic HF compared with non-cachectic patients (237 (sd 18) v. 147 (sd 10) fmol/ml, P < 0·001)( Reference Nagaya, Uematsu and Kojima 108 ). A small, uncontrolled study of intravenous infusion of ghrelin in ten patients with cardiac cachexia, predominantly patients in New York Heart Association class III, showed promising cardiovascular results( Reference Nagaya, Moriya and Yasumura 109 ). Patients received ghrelin at a dose of 2 µg/kg body weight for 30 min twice daily for 3 weeks, thereby inducing a 25-fold increase in growth hormone serum levels and an increase in food intake lean body mass as well as an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (from 27 (sd 2) to 31 (sd 2) %, P < 0·05)( Reference Nagaya, Moriya and Yasumura 109 ). Similar results regarding heart function, body weight and body composition have been described in animal models of HF( Reference Nagaya, Uematsu and Kojima 110 ). Some ghrelin analogues are in development and have shown promising early results in animal models of HF( Reference Palus, von Haehling and Doehner 111 ), reducing, for example, the expression of myostatin in skeletal muscle( Reference Lenk, Palus and Schur 112 , Reference Chen, Guillory and Zhang 113 ). Therapeutic effects included increases in lean mass as well as in fat mass( Reference Palus, Schur and Akashi 114 ). Ghrelin receptor agonists such as anamorelin are currently also undergoing clinical testing and can achieve increases in body weight as well as appetite, but studies have so far focused on cancer cachexia, and large-scale studies are still missing( Reference Garcia, Friend and Allen 115 Reference Pietra, Takeda and Tazawa-Ogata 118 ). Besides, several myostatin antibodies are currently in development and are being tested in clinical trials. No studies in HF are currently available, but animal models have shown that, for example, REGN1033, a fully human anti-myostatin antagonist antibody, increased fibre size, muscle mass and force production in young mice by approximately 20 %, and it improved physical performance outcomes in combination with treadmill exercise in 2-year-old mice( Reference Bauerlein, Pangilinan and Salzler 119 ).

Espindolol (MT-102) is another substance that has recently finished a phase II clinical trial, showing good efficacy in patients with cancer cachexia. A total of eighty-seven patients were randomly assigned to espindolol, an anabolic/catabolic transforming agent that has three potential pharmacological targets in cachexia, namely reduced catabolism via non-selective β-blockade, reduced fatigue and thermogenesis through central 5-hydroxytryptamine 1a antagonism and increased anabolism through partial β2 receptor agonism or placebo( Reference Stewart Coats, Srinivasan and Surendran 120 ). After 16 weeks treatment, patients on espindolol showed beneficial effects on body weight and hand grip strength, i.e. the slope of weight change in the high-dose group of espindolol demonstrated a positive slope compared with a negative slope in the placebo group (P < 0·0001)( Reference Stewart Coats, Fuang and Prabbash 121 ).

Conclusions

Sarcopenia and cachexia remain underrecognised and underdiagnosed in patients with HF. This fact has several reasons, which embrace sarcopenia being mostly a diagnosis in the domain of geriatricians, and cachexia being most prevalent in patients with cancer. Anyhow, the prevalence of sarcopenia in HF, the preferred term being muscle wasting, reaches almost 20 %, that of cachexia probably about 10 %. Another reason for the lack of awareness among cardiologists is the lack of effective treatments. Muscle wasting is best tackled using exercise training, but its effectiveness can probably be improved by nutritional or drug treatments. Essential amino acids and high energetic nutritional supplements have shown some clinical merit. Testosterone and other anabolics have been extensively investigated and have shown clinical benefit, but large-scale studies are still lacking. More recent additions to the wasting treatment portfolio such as appetite stimulants, anamorelin, ghrelin agonists or myostatin antagonists need to be evaluated in clinical trials of HF.

Financial Support

Preparation of this manuscript was partly funded by a grant from the Innovative Medicines Initiative – Joint Undertaking (IMI-JU 115621).

Conflicts of Interest

Stephan von Haehling has been a paid consultant to Thermo Fisher Scientific, Solartium Dietetics, Professional Dietetics, Pfizer, Respicardia, Sorin, Novartis, and Vifor Pharma.

Authorship

Stephan von Haehling presented the content of this manuscript at the Conference on ‘Nutrition and age-related muscle loss, sarcopenia and cachexia' in London, UK. He wrote the manuscript based on the content of this talk.

References

1. Morley, JE, von Haehling, S, Anker, SD et al. (2014) From sarcopenia to frailty: a road less traveled. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 5, 58.Google Scholar
2. Janssen, I, Heymsfield, SB, Wang, ZM et al. (2000) Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18–88 yr. J Appl Physiol 89, 8188.Google Scholar
3. Morley, JE, Anker, SD & von Haehling, S (2014) Prevalence, incidence, and clinical impact of sarcopenia: facts, numbers, and epidemiology-update 2014. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 5, 253259.Google Scholar
4. Rosenberg, IH (2011) Sarcopenia: origins and clinical relevance. Clin Geriatr Med 27, 337339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Anker, SD, Ponikowski, P, Varney, S et al. (1997) Wasting as independent risk factor for mortality in chronic heart failure. Lancet 349, 10501053.Google Scholar
6. Doehner, W & Anker, SD (2002) Cardiac cachexia in early literature: a review of research prior to Medline. Int J Cardiol 85, 714.Google Scholar
7. von Haehling, S, Morley, JE & Anker, SD (2010) An overview of sarcopenia: facts and numbers on prevalence and clinical impact. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 1, 129133.Google Scholar
8. Alchin, DR (2014) Sarcopenia: describing rather than defining a condition. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 5, 265268.Google Scholar
9. Roubenoff, R, Heymsfield, SB, Kehayias, JJ et al. (1997) Cannon JG, Rosenberg IH. Standardization of nomenclature of body composition in weight loss. Am J Clin Nutr 66, 192196.Google Scholar
10. Narici, MV & Maffulli, N (2010) Sarcopenia: characteristics, mechanisms and functional significance. Br Med Bull 95, 139159.Google Scholar
11. Barbat-Artigas, S, Plouffe, S, Pion, CH et al. (2013) Toward a sex-specific relationship between muscle strength and appendicular lean body mass index? J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 4, 137144.Google Scholar
12. Goodman, MJ, Ghate, SR, Mavros, P et al. (2013) Development of a practical screening tool to predict low muscle mass using NHANES 1999–2004. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 4, 187197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Villani, AM, Miller, MD, Cameron, ID et al. (2013) Development and relative validity of a new field instrument for detection of geriatric cachexia: preliminary analysis in hip fracture patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 4, 209216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. von Haehling, S, Steinbeck, L, Doehner, W et al. (2013) Muscle wasting in heart failure: an overview. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 45, 22572265.Google Scholar
15. Anker, SD, Coats, AJ, Morley, JE et al. (2014) Muscle wasting disease: a proposal for a new disease classification. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 5, 13.Google Scholar
16. Abellan van Kan, G (2009) Epidemiology and consequences of sarcopenia. J Nutr Health Aging 13, 708712.Google Scholar
17. Doherty, TJ (2003) Invited review: aging and sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol 95, 17171727.Google Scholar
18. Morley, JE, Kim, MJ, Haren, MT et al. (2005) Frailty and the aging male. Aging Male 8, 135140.Google Scholar
19. Fearon, K, Evans, WJ & Anker, SD (2011) Myopenia-a new universal term for muscle wasting. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2, 13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Fülster, S, Tacke, M, Sandek, A et al. (2013) Muscle wasting in patients with chronic heart failure: results from the studies investigating co-morbidities aggravating heart failure (SICA-HF). Eur Heart J 34, 512519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Anker, SD, Ponikowski, PP, Clark, AL et al. (1999) Cytokines and neurohormones relating to body composition alterations in the wasting syndrome of chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 20, 683693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Farkas, J, von Haehling, S, Kalantar-Zadeh, K et al. (2013) Cachexia as a major public health problem: frequent, costly, and deadly. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 4, 173178.Google Scholar
23. Ebner, N, Elsner, S, Springer, J et al. (2013) Molecular mechanisms and treatment targets of muscle wasting and cachexia in heart failure: an overview. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 8, 1524.Google Scholar
24. Hopkinson, JB (2014) Psychosocial impact of cancer cachexia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 5, 8994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Wanger, T, Foster, NR, Nguyen, PL et al. (2014) Patients’ rationale for declining participation in a cancer-associated weight loss study. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 5, 121125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Vaughan, VC, Martin, P & Lewandowski, PA (2013) Cancer cachexia: impact, mechanisms and emerging treatments. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 4, 95109.Google Scholar
27. Argilés, JM, Fontes-Oliveira, CC, Toledo, M et al. (2014) Cachexia: a problem of energetic inefficiency. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 5, 279286.Google Scholar
28. Yoshida, T & Delafontaine, P (2015) Mechanisms of cachexia in chronic disease states. Am J Med Sci (In the Press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Dirks, AJ & Leeuwenburgh, C (2005) The role of apoptosis in age-related skeletal muscle atrophy. Sports Med 35, 473483.Google Scholar
30. Malmstrom, TK, Miller, DK, Herning, MM et al. (2013) Low appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) with limited mobility and poor health outcomes in middle-aged African Americans. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 4, 179186.Google Scholar
31. Janssen, HC, Samson, MM, Meeuwsen, IB et al. (2004) Strength, mobility and falling in women referred to a geriatric outpatient clinic. Aging Clin Exp Res 16, 122125.Google Scholar
32. Janssen, I, Baumgartner, RN, Ross, R et al. (2004) Skeletal muscle cutpoints associated with elevated physical disability risk in older men and women. Am J Epidemiol 159, 413421.Google Scholar
33. Muiller-Hocker, J (1988) Morphologie, Cytochemie und Immunhistochemie des Cytochrom-c-oxidase-Mangels. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol 72, 552565.Google Scholar
34. Ranvier, L (1873) Proprietés et structures différentes des muscles rouges et des muscles blancs chez les lapins et chez les raies. Cr Acad Sci Paris 77, 10301034.Google Scholar
35. Hultman, E (1995) Fuel selection, muscle fibre. Proc Nutr Soc 54, 107121.Google Scholar
36. Daugaard, JR & Richter, EA (2001) Relationship between muscle fibre composition, glucose transporter protein 4 and exercise training: possible consequences in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Acta Physiol Scand 171, 267276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Lexell, J, Taylor, CC & Sjöström, M (1988) What is the cause of the ageing atrophy? Total number, size and proportion of different fiber types studied in whole vastus lateralis muscle from 15- to 83-year-old men. J Neurol Sci 84, 275294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38. Lexell, J (1995) Human aging, muscle mass, and fiber type composition. J Gerontol A, Biol Sci Med Sci 50, 1116.Google Scholar
39. Campbell, MJ, McComas, AJ, Petito, F et al. (1973) Physiological changes in ageing muscles. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 36, 174182.Google Scholar
40. Borkan, GA, Hults, DE, Gerzof, SG et al. (1983) Age changes in body composition revealed by computed tomography. J Gerontol 38, 673677.Google Scholar
41. Overend, TJ, Cunningham, DA, Paterson, DH et al. (1992) Thigh composition in young and elderly men determined by computed tomography. Clin Physiol 12, 629640.Google Scholar
42. Taaffe, DR, Henwood, TR, Nalls, MA et al. (2009) Alterations in muscle attenuation following detraining and retraining in resistance-trained older adults. Gerontology 55, 217223.Google Scholar
43. Cadenas, E & Davies, KJ (2000) Mitochondrial free radical generation, oxidative stress, and aging. Free Radic Biol Med 29, 222230.Google Scholar
44. Pollack, M & Leeuwenburgh, C (2001) Apoptosis and aging: role of the mitochondria. J Gerontol A, Biol Sci Med Sci 56, B475B482.Google Scholar
45. Drew, B, Phaneuf, S, Dirks, A et al. (2003) Effects of aging and caloric restriction on mitochondrial energy production in gastrocnemius muscle and heart. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 284, R474R480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46. von Haehling, S, Genth-Zotz, S, Anker, SD et al. (2002) Cachexia: a therapeutic approach beyond cytokine antagonism. Int J Cardiol 85, 173183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47. Barton-Davis, ER, Shoturma, DI & Sweeney, HL (1999) Contribution of satellite cells to IGF-I induced hypertrophy of skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 167, 301305.Google Scholar
48. Murton, AJ, Constantin, D & Greenhaff, PL (2008) The involvement of the ubiquitin proteasome system in human skeletal muscle remodelling and atrophy. Biochim Biophys Acta 1782, 730743.Google Scholar
49. Loncar, G, Fülster, S, von Haehling, S et al. (2013) Metabolism and the heart: an overview of muscle, fat, and bone metabolism in heart failure. Int J Cardiol 162, 7785.Google Scholar
50. Tacke, M, Ebner, N, Boschmann, M et al. (2013) Resting energy expenditure and the effects of muscle wasting in patients with chronic heart failure: results from the Studies Investigating Comorbidities Aggravating Heart Failure (SICA-HF). J Am Med Dir Assoc 14, 837841.Google Scholar
51. Cicoira, M, Zanolla, L, Franceschini, L et al. (2001) Skeletal muscle mass independently predicts peak oxygen consumption and ventilatory response during exercise in noncachectic patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 37, 20802085.Google Scholar
52. Coats, AJS (1996) The “muscle hypothesis” of chronic heart failure. J Mol Cell Cardiol 28, 22552262.Google Scholar
53. Sullivan, MJ, Green, HJ & Cobb, FR (1990) Skeletal muscle biochemistry and histology in ambulatory patients with long-term heart failure. Circulation 81, 518527.Google Scholar
54. Mancini, DM, Walter, G, Reichek, N et al. (1992) Contribution of skeletal muscle atrophy to exercise intolerance and altered muscle metabolism in heart failure. Circulation 85, 13641373.Google Scholar
55. Drexler, H, Riede, U, Münzel, T et al. (1992) Alterations of skeletal muscle in chronic heart failure. Circulation 85, 17511759.Google Scholar
56. Lipkin, DP, Jones, DA, Round, JM et al. (1988) Abnormalities of skeletal muscle in patients with chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol 18, 187195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57. Vescovo, G & Dalla Libera, L (2006) Skeletal muscle apoptosis in experimental heart failure: the only link between inflammation and skeletal muscle wastage? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 9, 416422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58. Adams, V, Jiang, H, Yu, J et al. (1999) Apoptosis in skeletal myocytes of patients with chronic heart failure is associated with exercise intolerance. J Am Coll Cardiol 33, 959965.Google Scholar
59. Harrington, D, Anker, SD, Chua, TP et al. (1997) Skeletal muscle function and its relation to exercise tolerance in chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 30, 17581764.Google Scholar
60. Gielen, S, Sandri, M, Kozarez, I et al. (2012) Exercise training attenuates MuRF-1 expression in the skeletal muscle of patients with chronic heart failure independent of age: the randomized Leipzig Exercise Intervention in Chronic Heart Failure and Aging catabolism study. Circulation 125, 27162727.Google Scholar
61. Hambrecht, R, Schulze, PC, Gielen, S et al. (2002) Reduction of insulin-like growth factor-I expression in the skeletal muscle of noncachectic patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 39, 11751181.Google Scholar
62. Toth, MJ, Ward, K, van der Velden, J et al. (2011) Chronic heart failure reduces Akt phosphorylation in human skeletal muscle: relationship to muscle size and function. J Appl Physiol 110, 892900.Google Scholar
63. Cicoira, M, Kalra, PR & Anker, SD (2003) Growth hormone resistance in chronic heart failure and its therapeutic implications. J Card Fail 9, 219226.Google Scholar
64. Anker, SD & von Haehling, S (2004) Inflammatory mediators in chronic heart failure: an overview. Heart 90, 464470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65. Ferrari, R, Bachetti, T, Confortini, R et al. (1995) Tumor necrosis factor soluble receptors in patients with various degrees of congestive heart failure. Circulation 92, 14791486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66. Rauchhaus, M, Doehner, W, Francis, DP et al. (2000) Plasma cytokine parameters and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation 102, 30603067.Google Scholar
67. Khawaja, T, Chokshi, A, Ji, R et al. (2014) Ventricular assist device implantation improves skeletal muscle function, oxidative capacity, and growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-1 axis signaling in patients with advanced heart failure. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 5, 297305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
68. Melenovsky, V, Kotrc, M, Borlaug, BA et al. (2013) Relationships between right ventricular function, body composition, and prognosis in advanced heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 62, 16601670.Google Scholar
69. Christensen, HM, Kistorp, C, Schou, M et al. (2014) Cross-talk between the heart and adipose tissue in cachectic heart failure patients with respect to alterations in body composition: a prospective study. Metabolism 63, 141149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
70. Szabó, T, Postrach, E, Mähler, A et al. (2013) Increased catabolic activity in adipose tissue of patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 15, 11311137.Google Scholar
71. Tanaka, T, Tsutamoto, T, Sakai, H et al. (2008) Effect of atrial natriuretic peptide on adiponectin in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 10, 360366.Google Scholar
72. Lyon, CJ, Law, RE & Hsueh, WA (2003) Minireview: adiposity, inflammation, and atherogenesis. Endocrinology 144, 21952200.Google Scholar
73. Arita, Y, Kihara, S, Ouchi, N et al. (1999) Paradoxical decrease of an adipose-specific protein, adiponectin, in obesity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 257, 7983.Google Scholar
74. Lavie, CJ, Osman, AF, Milani, RV et al. (2003) Body composition and prognosis in chronic systolic heart failure: the obesity paradox. Am J Cardiol 91, 891894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
75. Lenk, K, Erbs, S, Höllriegel, R et al. (2012) Exercise training leads to a reduction of elevated myostatin levels in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Prev Cardiol 19, 404411.Google Scholar
76. Cunha, TF, Bacurau, AV, Moreira, JB et al. (2012) Exercise training prevents oxidative stress and ubiquitin–proteasome system overactivity and reverse skeletal muscle atrophy in heart failure. PLoS ONE 7, e41701.Google Scholar
77. Smart, NA & Steele, M (2011) The effect of physical training on systemic proinflammatory cytokine expression in heart failure patients: a systematic review. Congest Heart Fail 17, 110114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
78. Gould, DW, Lahart, I, Carmichael, AR et al. (2013) Cancer cachexia prevention via physical exercise: molecular mechanisms. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 4, 111124.Google Scholar
79. Sasso, JP, Eves, ND, Christensen, JF et al. (2015) A framework for prescription in exercise-oncology research. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 6, 115124.Google Scholar
80. McMurray, JJ, Adamopoulos, S, Anker, SD et al. (2012) ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 14, 803869.Google Scholar
81. O'Connor, CM, Whellan, DJ, Lee, KL et al. (2009) Efficacy and safety of exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure: HFACTION randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 301, 14391450.Google Scholar
82. Piepoli, MF, Conraads, V, Corrà, U et al. (2011) Exercise training in heart failure: from theory to practice. A consensus document of the Heart Failure Association and the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Heart Fail 13, 347357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
83. Ebner, N, Elsner, S, Springer, J et al. (2014) Molecular mechanisms and treatment targets of muscle wasting and cachexia in heart failure: an overview. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 8, 1524.Google Scholar
84. Anker, MS, von Haehling, S, Springer, J et al. (2013) Highlights of the mechanistic and therapeutic cachexia and sarcopenia research 2010 to 2012 and their relevance for cardiology. Int J Cardiol 162, 7376.Google Scholar
85. Wakabayashi, H & Sakuma, K (2014) Rehabilitation nutrition for sarcopenia with disability: a combination of both rehabilitation and nutrition care management. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 5, 269277.Google Scholar
86. Osterziel, KJ, Strohm, O, Schuler, J et al. (1998) Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of human recombinant growth hormone in patients with chronic heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy. Lancet 351, 12331237.Google Scholar
87. Ryall, JG & Lynch, GS (2008) The potential and the pitfalls of beta-adrenoceptor agonists for the management of skeletal muscle wasting. Pharmacol Ther 120, 219232.Google Scholar
88. Busquets, S, Toledo, M, Penna, F et al. (2014) Complete reversal on muscle wasting in an animal model of cancer cachexia: additive effects of myostatin inhibition and beta-2 agonist treatment. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 5, 3578 (Abstract).Google Scholar
89. Toledo, M, Springer, J, Busquets, S et al. (2014) Formoterol in the treatment of experimental cancer cachexia: effects on heart function. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 5, 315320.Google Scholar
90. Aquilani, R, Opasich, C, Gualco, A et al. (2008) Adequate energy-protein intake is not enough to improve nutritional and metabolic status in muscle-depleted patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 10, 112711112735.Google Scholar
91. Banerjee, P, Caulfield, B, Crowe, L et al. (2009) Prolonged electrical muscle stimulation exercise improves strength, peak VO2, and exercise capacity in patients with stable chronic heart failure. J Card Fail 15, 319326.Google Scholar
92. Volterrani, M, Rosano, G & Iellamo, F (2012) Testosterone and heart failure. Endocrine 42, 272277.Google Scholar
93. Josiak, K, Jankowska, EA, Piepoli, MF et al. (2014) Skeletal myopathy in patients with chronic heart failure: significance of anabolic-androgenic hormones. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 5, 287296.Google Scholar
94. Jankowska, EA, Biel, B, Majda, J et al. (2006) Anabolic deficiency in men with chronic heart failure: prevalence and detrimental impact on survival. Circulation 114, 18291837.Google Scholar
95. Caminiti, G, Volterrani, M, Iellamo, F et al. (2009) Effect of long-acting testosterone treatment on functional exercise capacity, skeletal muscle performance, insulin resistance, and baroreflex sensitivity in elderly patients with chronic heart failure a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol 54, 919927.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
96. Iellamo, F, Volterrani, M, Caminiti, G et al. (2010) Testosterone therapy in women with chronic heart failure: a pilot double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Am Coll Cardiol 56, 13101316.Google Scholar
97. Takagi, KI, Horie, K, Fujita, E et al. (2013) Anabolic effect of A Novel Long-Acting SARM in Rat ORX model. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 4, 295343 (Abstract).Google Scholar
98. Dobs, AS, Boccia, RV, Croot, CC et al. (2013) Effects of enobosarm on muscle wasting and physical function in patients with cancer: a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 14, 335345.Google Scholar
99. Basaria, S, Collins, L, Dillon, EL et al. (2013) The safety, pharmacokinetics, and effects of LGD-4033, a novel nonsteroidal oral, selective androgen receptor modulator, in healthy young men. J Gerontol A, Biol Sci Med Sci 68, 8795.Google Scholar
100. Papanicolaou, DA, Ather, SN, Zhu, H et al. (2013) A phase IIA randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial to study the efficacy and safety of the selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM), MK-0773 in female participants with sarcopenia. J Nutr Health Aging 17, 533543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
101. Crawford, J, Dalton, JT, Hancock, ML et al. (2014) Enobosarm, a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM), increases lean body mass (LBM) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients in two pivotal, international Phase 3 trials. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 5, 3578 (Abstract).Google Scholar
102. von Haehling, S, Lainscak, M, Springer, J et al. (2009) Cardiac cachexia: a systematic overview. Pharmacol Ther 121, 227252.Google Scholar
103. von Haehling, S, Anker, SD (2014) Prevalence, incidence and clinical impact of cachexia: facts and numbers-update 2014. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 5, 261263.Google Scholar
104. Rozentryt, P, von Haehling, S, Lainscak, M et al. (2010) The effects of a high-caloric protein-rich oral nutritional supplement in patients with chronic heart failure and cachexia on quality of life, body composition, and inflammation markers: a randomized, double-blind pilot study. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 1, 3542.Google Scholar
105. Kojima, M, Hosoda, H, Date, Y et al. (1999) Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature 402, 656660.Google Scholar
106. Date, Y, Kojima, M, Hosoda, H et al. (2000) Ghrelin, a novel growth hormone-releasing acylated peptide, is synthesized in a distinct endocrine cell type in the gastrointestinal tracts of rats and humans. Endocrinology 141, 42554261.Google Scholar
107. Blum, D, Oberholzer, R, de Wolf-Linder, S et al. (2013) Individually dose-optimized Phase I-II study with natural ghrelin in advanced cancer patients with cachexia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 4, 295343 (Abstract).Google Scholar
108. Nagaya, N, Uematsu, M, Kojima, M et al. (2001) Elevated circulating level of ghrelin in cachexia associated with chronic heart failure: relationships between ghrelin and anabolic/catabolic factors. Circulation 104, 20342038.Google Scholar
109. Nagaya, N, Moriya, J, Yasumura, Y et al. (2004) Effects of ghrelin administration on left ventricular function, exercise capacity, and muscle wasting in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation 110, 36743679.Google Scholar
110. Nagaya, N, Uematsu, M, Kojima, M et al. (2001) Chronic administration of ghrelin improves left ventricular dysfunction and attenuates development of cardiac cachexia in rats with heart failure. Circulation 104, 14301435.Google Scholar
111. Palus, S, von Haehling, S, Doehner, W et al. (2013) Effect of application route of the ghrelin analog BIM-28131 (RM-131) on body weight and body composition in a rat heart failure model. Int J Cardiol 168, 23692374.Google Scholar
112. Lenk, K, Palus, S, Schur, R et al. (2013) Effect of ghrelin and its analogues, BIM-28131 and BIM-28125, on the expression of myostatin in a rat heart failure model. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 4, 6369.Google Scholar
113. Chen, JA, Guillory, B, Zhang, G et al. (2013) Ghrelin prevents cancer-related muscle wasting through GHSR-independent regulation of myostatin and p38. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 4, 295343 (Abstract).Google Scholar
114. Palus, S, Schur, R, Akashi, YJ et al. (2011) Ghrelin and its analogues, BIM-28131 and BIM-28125, improve body weight and regulate the expression of MuRF-1 and MAFbx in a rat heart failure model. PLoS ONE 6, e26865.Google Scholar
115. Garcia, JM, Friend, J & Allen, S (2013) Therapeutic potential of anamorelin, a novel, oral ghrelin mimetic, in patients with cancer-related cachexia: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover, pilot study. Support Care Cancer 21, 129237.Google Scholar
116. Garcia, JM, Boccia, RV, Graham, CD et al. (2015) Anamorelin for patients with cancer cachexia: an integrated analysis of two phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials. Lancet Oncol 16, 108116.Google Scholar
117. Abernethy, A, Temel, J, Currow, D et al. (2013) Anamorelin HCl for the treatment of anorexia-cachexia in lung cancer: study design and baseline characteristics of patients in the phase III clinical trial ROMANA 2 (HT-ANAM-302). J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 4, 295343 (Abstract).Google Scholar
118. Pietra, C, Takeda, Y, Tazawa-Ogata, N et al. (2014) Anamorelin HCl (ONO-7643), a novel ghrelin receptor agonist, for the treatment of cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome: preclinical profile. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 5, 329337.Google Scholar
119. Bauerlein, R, Pangilinan, J, Salzler, R et al. (2013) Efficacy of REGN1033, a fully human anti-myostatin antagonist antibody, in rodent muscle function. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 4, 295343 (Abstract).Google Scholar
120. Stewart Coats, AJ, Srinivasan, V, Surendran, J et al. (2011) The ACT-ONE trial, a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study of the anabolic/catabolic transforming agent, MT-102 in subjects with cachexia related to stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer: study design. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2, 201207.Google Scholar
121. Stewart Coats, AJ, Fuang, HG, Prabbash, K et al. (2014) Espindolol for the treatment and prevention of cachexia in patients with stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer or colorectal cancer (ACT-ONE): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international multi-centre phase II study. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 5, 3578 (Abstract).Google Scholar
122. Evans, WJ, Morley, JE, Argilés, J et al. (2008) Cachexia: a new definition. Clin Nutr 27, 793799.Google Scholar
123. Morley, JE, Abbatecola, AM, Argiles, JM et al. (2011) Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders Trialist Workshop. Sarcopenia with limited mobility: an international consensus. J Am Med Dir Assoc 12, 403409.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Definitions and prevalence of sarcopenia and cachexia in heart failure

Figure 1

Fig. 1. (Colour online) The wasting continuum in heart failure (HF). Mitochondrial dysfunction, infiltration by fat and connective tissue, muscle fibre transformation, denervation of fast type fibres and myocyte apoptosis all play a role in muscle wasting (sarcopenia) that develops early in HF. Overactivity of the ubiquitin–proteasome system leads to myofibril degeneration. Cachexia is less prevalent than muscle wasting. It is associated with muscle and adipose tissue wasting; osteoporosis affects up to 50 % of patients but has been studied least well in HF.