Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:24:39.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Right to Hunger Strike – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2023

CANDICE DELMAS Open the ORCID record for CANDICE DELMAS [Opens in a new window]
CANDICE DELMAS*
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, United States
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Corrigendum
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 118 , Issue 2 , May 2024 , pp. 1092
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Concerns were raised with the journal that citations in the above article to Barilan 2017 misrepresent the cited author’s argument. These citations occur in the following locations in the article: section “The Medical Account,” paragraph 3, and section “The Medical Account,” paragraph 7.

To rectify this issue, the author proposes the removal of the citation to Barilan 2017 in both these locations. In the section “The Medical Account,” paragraph 7, the author makes the following corrections:

Original text in paragraph 7:

The medical right to hunger strike also stands in tension with other involuntary interferences with bodily autonomy such as cavity searches and “suicide watch” protocols, which are routine in prison and commonly accepted (Barilan 2017, 351–5).

Corrected text in paragraph 7:

The medical right to hunger strike also stands in tension with other involuntary interferences with bodily autonomy such as cavity searches and “suicide watch” protocols, which are routine in prison and commonly accepted (WHO 2007; Bell v. Wolfish 1979).

The argument and research presented remain unaffected by these amendments.

References

The author proposes the following changes to the reference list:

Removal of Barilan, Yechiel, M. 2017. “The Role of Doctors in Hunger Strikes.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27 (3): 341–69.Google Scholar
Addition of World Health Organization (WHO). 2007. Preventing Suicide in Jails and Prisons. Geneva: WHO Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.