No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Allies in a standoff: Examining the confrontation between Turkey and the United States in Syria
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 September 2024
Abstract
Turkish confrontation with the United States (US) in Syria serves as a test case for how junior allies, which often rely on their senior allies for defence and security, can come close to armed conflict with them. Neither the theoretical literature on alliances nor the empirical literature on Turkey–US relations provide sufficient insight into such a case. Addressing existing gaps requires identifying the likely factors that lead junior allies into disputes with their senior allies and examining junior allies’ ability to challenge the policies of their more powerful counterparts. In the case of Turkey, the way it withstood the US by revealing its readiness to use military force over the latter’s cooperation with armed groups Turkey considered a threat proves that, despite their disadvantage in the balance of power, junior allies can militarily stand up to their senior allies. Nonetheless, the fact that Turkey has failed to alter its ally’s behaviour shows the limits of success in this endeavour, the reason for which, in our case, lies in Turkey’s lack of normative attachment to and weak interest-based ties with the US.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The British International Studies Association.
References
1 Mustafa Aydın, ‘Geographical blessing versus geopolitical curse: Great power security agendas for the Black Sea region and a Turkish alternative’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 9:3 (2009), pp. 271–85; Serhat Güvenç and Soli Özel, ‘US–Turkey Relations since World War II: From alliance to transactionalism’, in Güneş Murat Tezcür (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Turkish Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2022), pp. 523–43; Stephen Larrabee, Turkey as a US Security Partner (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2008); Ian O. Lesser, ‘Turkey, the United States and the delusion of geopolitics’, Survival, 48:3 (2006), pp. 83–96; Oya Dursun Özkanca, Turkey–West Relations: The Politics of Intra-alliance Opposition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).
2 Didem Buhari Gulmez, ‘The resilience of the US–Turkey alliance: Divergent threat perceptions and worldviews’, Contemporary Politics, 26:4 (2020), pp. 475–92; Nur Çetinoğlu Harunoğlu, Ayşegül Sever, and Emre Erşen, Turkey between the United States and Russia: Surfing on the Edge (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2021).
3 Gulmez, ‘The resilience of the US–Turkey alliance’; Kadir Üstün, ‘U.S.–Turkey relations endure despite crises’, Insight Turkey, 22:2 (2020), pp. 23–32.
4 Morton Abramowitz and Eric Edelman, ‘Turkey: An increasingly undependable ally’, Bipartisan Policy Center (23 April 2015), available at: {https://bipartisanpolicy.org/report/turkey-an-increasingly-undependable-ally/}.
5 Ali Balcı, ‘A three-level analysis of Turkey’s crisis with the U.S.-led order’, Insight Turkey, 21:4 (2019), pp. 13–24; Mustafa Kutlay and Ziya Öniş, ‘Turkish foreign policy in a post-Western order: Strategic autonomy or new forms of dependence?’, International Affairs, 97:4 (2021), pp. 1085–104.
6 See, for example, Alexander Lanoszka, Military Alliances in the Twenty-First Century (Cambridge: Polity, 2022); James D. Morrow, ‘Alliances and asymmetry: An alternative to the capability aggregation’, American Journal of Political Science, 35:4 (1991), pp. 904–33; Paul Poast, Arguing about Alliances (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2019); Stephen M. Walt, The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987); Patricia A. Weitsman, Dangerous Alliances: Proponents of Peace, Weapons of War (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004).
7 See, for example, Brett Leeds and Burcu Savun, ‘Terminating alliances: Why do states abrogate agreements’, The Journal of Politics, 69:4 (2007), pp. 1118–32; Glenn H. Snyder, ‘Alliance theory: A neorealist first cut’, Journal of International Affairs, 44:1 (1990), pp. 103–23.
8 Stefan Bergsmann, ‘The concept of military alliance’, in Erich Reiter and Heinz Gartner (eds), Small States and Alliances (New York: Springer, 2001), pp. 25–37 (p. 26).
9 Walt, The Origins of Alliances.
10 Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1979).
11 Paul W. Schroeder, Systems, Stability, and Statecraft: Essays on the International History of Modern Europe (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), pp. 195–222.
12 Snyder, ‘Alliance theory’; Prashant Hosur Suhas, ‘How alliances shape rivalries’, International Studies Quarterly, 67:4 (2023), p. sqad070.
13 Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, War Trap (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1981); Hyung Min Kim, Jungmoo Woo, and Jae Chul Lee, ‘What is the relationship between alliance and militarized conflict? Analysis of reciprocal causation’, Armed Forces & Society, 46:4 (2020), pp. 539–63; James Lee Ray, ‘Friends as foes: International conflict and wars between formal allies’, in Charles Gochman and Alan Sabrosky (eds), Prisoners of War (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 1990), pp. 73–91.
14 Leeds and Burcu Savun, ‘Terminating alliances’; Morrow, ‘Alliances and asymmetry’.
15 David H. Bearce, Kristen M. Flanagan, and Katharine M. Floros, ‘Alliances, internal information, and military conflict among member-states’, International Organization, 60:3 (2006), pp. 595–625.
16 Andrew G. Long, Timothy Nordstrom, and Kyeonghi Baek, ‘Allying for peace: Treaty obligations and conflict between allies’, The Journal of Politics, 69:4 (2007), pp. 1103–17.
17 Gregory Winger, ‘Alliance embeddedness: Rodrigo Duterte and the resilience of the US–Philippine alliance’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 17:7 (2021), available at: {https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orab013}.
18 I am grateful to one of the reviewers for bringing this example to my attention.
19 Thomas Ambrosio, ‘Belarus, Kazakhstan and alliance security dilemmas in the former Soviet Union: Intra-alliance threat and entrapment after the Ukraine crisis’, Europe-Asia Studies, 74:9 (2022), pp. 1700–28; Alena Vysotskaya Guedes Vieira, ‘Ukraine’s crisis and Russia’s closest allies: A reinforced intra-alliance security dilemma at work’, The International Spectator, 49:4 (2014), pp. 97–111.
20 Daniel M. Jones, Stuart A. Bremer, and J. David Singer, ‘Militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns’, Conflict Management and Peace Science, 15:2 (1996), pp. 163–213 (p. 168).
21 Jasen J. Castillo and Alexander B. Downes, ‘Loyalty, hedging, or exit: How weaker alliance partners respond to the rise of new threats’, Journal of Strategic Studies, 46:2 (2023), pp. 227–68.
22 John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2014), p. 157; Waltz, Theory of International Politics, p. 168.
23 See, for example, Carla Norrlöf, ‘NATO is not a hegemonic burden’, Project Syndicate (2 April 2024), available at: {https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/nato-at-75-unique-source-of-american-power-in-the-world-by-carla-norrlof-2024-04}.
24 Box-B has been depicted in a way that illustrates this point.
25 For an analysis of dyadic interactions, see Paul D. Senese and John A. Vasquez, The Steps to War: An Empirical Study (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008).
26 Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, pp. 142–3.
27 See, for example, Bueno de Mesquita, War Trap.
28 Brian Blankenship and Erik Lin-Greenberg, ‘Trivial tripwires? Military capabilities and alliance reassurance’, Security Studies, 31:1 (2022), pp. 92–117.
29 Randall L. Schweller, ‘Bandwagoning for profit: Bringing the revisionist state back in’, International Security, 19:1 (1994), pp. 72–107.
30 Bueno de Mesquita, War Trap; Celeste A. Wallander and Robert O. Keohane, ‘Risk, threat, and security institutions’, in Helga Haftendorn, Robert O. Keohane, and Celeste A. Wallander (eds), Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 21–47.
31 Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett (eds), Security Communities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
32 Alexandra Gheciu, ‘Security institutions as agents of socialization? NATO and the “New Europe”’, International Organization, 59:4 (2005), pp. 973–1012.
33 Ibid., p. 990.
34 Winger, ‘Alliance embeddedness’.
35 Senese and Vasquez, The Steps to War, pp. 20–1.
36 Bueno de Mesquita, War Trap.
37 Morrow, ‘Alliances and asymmetry’.
38 Paul Poast, ‘Does issue linkage work? Evidence from European alliance negotiations, 1860 to 1945’, International Organization, 66:2 (2012), pp. 277–310.
39 Türkiye Cumhuriyet Dışişleri Bakanlığı, ‘Dışişleri Bakanı Sayın Ahmet Davutoğlu’nun ABD Dışişleri Bakanı Hillary Clinton ile ortak basın toplantısı 11 Ağustos 2012, İstanbul’ (11 August 2012), available at: {https://www.mfa.gov.tr/disisleri-bakani-sayin-ahmet-davutoglu_nun-abd-disisleri-bakani-hillary-clinton-ile-ortak-basin-toplantisi.tr.mfa}.
40 Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye, ‘Al-Quds is Muslims’ red line’ (5 December 2017), available at: {https://www.tccb.gov.tr/en/news/542/87594/al-quds-is-muslims-red-line}.
41 David E. Sanger, Confront and Conceal: Obama’s Secret Wars and Surprising Use of American Power (New York: Crown Publishers, 2012), Kindle edition, pp. 5615–20.
42 Jacob Abadi, ‘US–Syria relations in the shadow of Cold War and détente’, Middle Eastern Studies, 57:4 (2021), pp. 534–52.
43 Behlül Ozkan, ‘Turkey, Davutoglu and the idea of pan-Islamism’, Survival, 56:4 (2014), pp. 119–40.
44 TRT Haber, ‘Başbakan Erdoğan net konuştu’ (30 August 2013), available at: {https://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/basbakan-erdogan-net-konustu-99175.html}.
45 Sanger, Confront and Conceal, p. 5611.
46 The White House, ‘Letter from the President: Authorization for the use of United States Armed Forces in connection with the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant’ (11 February 2015), available at: {https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/02/11/letter-president-authorization-use-United-states-armed-forces-connection}.
47 AK Parti, ‘Suriye rejimi, ISID ve PKK düsmandir’ (28 October 2014), available at: {https://www.akparti.org.tr/haberler/suriye-rejimi-%C4%B1sid-ve-pkk-dusmandir/}.
48 Ibid.
49 Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı, ‘CNN International’ın Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan ile mülakatı’ (3 September 2015), available at: {https://www.tccb.gov.tr/mulakatlar/1709/34284/cnn-internationalin-cumhurbaskani-erdogan-ile-mulakati}.
50 Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı, ‘2023 Hedeflerine Doğru Kutlu Yürüyüş Devam Edecek’ (10 February 2016), available at: {https://www.tccb.gov.tr/haberler/410/38783/2023-hedeflerine-dogru-kutlu-yuruyus-devam-edecek}.
51 Brett McGurk, ‘Hard truths in Syria’, Foreign Affairs, 98:3 (2019), pp. 76–7. Quoted in Cengiz Çandar, Turkey’s Mission Impossible: War and Peace with the Kurds (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2020), Kindle edition, pp. 4624–5.
52 Sanger, Confront and Conceal, pp. 5604–5.
53 Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Milli Savunma Bakanlığı, ‘Zeytin Dalı harekâtı’ (2016), available at: {https://www.msb.gov.tr/ZeytinDaliHarekati}.
54 US Embassy & Consulates in Turkey, ‘Deputy Secretary Antony Blinken’s interview with NTV’s Ahmet Yeşiltepe’ (27 September 2016), available at: {https://tr.usembassy.gov/deputy-secretary-antony-blinkens-interview-ntvs-ahmet-yesiltepe/}.
55 Anadolu Ajansı, ‘TSK’dan Sincar ve Karaçok dağlarına hava harekatı’, AA (25 April 2017), available at: {https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/tskdan-sincar-ve-karacok-daglarina-hava-harekati/804409}.
56 US Department of State, ‘Department Press Briefing: April 27, 2017’ (2017), available at: {https://2017-2021.state.gov/briefings/department-press-briefing-april-27-2017/#TURKEY}.
57 Sedat Ergin, ‘ABD ile Menbiç’te büyük bilek güreşi’, Hürriyet (26 January 2018), available at: {https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/yazarlar/sedat-ergin/abd-ile-menbicte-buyuk-bilek-guresi-40721983}.
58 Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı, ‘Afrin Operasyonu Sahada Fiilen Başlamıştır’ (20 January 2018), available at: {https://www.tccb.gov.tr/haberler/410/89139/afrin-operasyonu-sahada-fiilen-baslamistir}.
59 Rob Nordland, ‘On northern Syria front line, U.S. and Turkey head into tense face-off’, New York Times (7 February 2018), available at: {https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/07/world/middleeast/us-turkey-manbij-kurds.html}.
60 Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı, ‘AK Parti grup toplantısında yaptıkları konuşma’ (13 Februrary 2018), available at: {https://www.tccb.gov.tr/konusmalar/353/90412/ak-parti-grup-toplantisinda-yaptiklari-konusma}.
61 Jones, Bremer, and Singer, ‘Militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1992’.
62 US Department of the Treasury, ‘Treasury designates Turkish ministries and senior officials in response to military action in Syria’ (2019), available at: {https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm792}.
63 Kara Kuvvetleri Komutanlığı, ‘Barış Pınarı Harekatı’ (2019), available at: {https://www.msb.gov.tr/SlaytHaber/1332020-57351}.
64 Joint Chiefs of Staff, ‘Esper condemns Turkey’s Syria incursion, says U.S. stands with Syrian Democratic Forces’ (11 October 2019), available at: {https://www.jcs.mil/Media/News/News-Display/Article/1988255/esper-condemns-turkeys-syria-incursion-says-us-stands-with-syrian-democratic-fo/}.
65 Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ‘Joint statement by representatives of Iran, Russia and Türkiye on outcomes of the 21st international meeting on Syria in the Astana Format, Astana, 24–25 January 2024’ (2024), available at: {https://www.mfa.gov.tr/iran–rusya-ve-turkiye-temsilcileri-tarafindan-yapilan-astana-formatindaki-suriye-konulu-21-yuksek-duzeyli-toplanti-ya-iliskin-ortak-bildiri.en.mfa}.
66 Thomas Gibbons-Neff, ‘How a 4-hour battle between Russian mercenaries and U.S. commandos unfolded in Syria’, New York Times (24 May 2018), available at: {https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/24/world/middleeast/american-commandos-russian-mercenaries-syria.html}.
67 David Ignatius, ‘Turkey is playing with fire in northern Syria’, Washington Post (23 November 2022), available at: {https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/11/23/turkey-attack-kurds-northern-syria/}.
68 US Department of Defense, ‘After U.S. downs Turkish drone in Syria, focus remains on defeat ISIS mission’ (5 October 2023), available at: {https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3550462/after-us-downs-turkish-drone-in-syria-focus-remains-on-defeat-isis-mission/}.
69 Congressional Record, ‘Proceedings and debates of the 89th Congress, second session, volume 112, part 1, 10 January–27 January 1966’ (1966), pp. 335–7.
70 Eray Alim, ‘Turkey’s post-colonial predicament and the perils of its Western-centric foreign policy (1955–1959)’, Middle Eastern Studies, 58:6 (2022), pp. 972–88.
71 Hüseyin Sert, ‘Bir raporun hikayesi: Türkiye’nin Batı ile ittifakında Dışişleri bürokrasisinin rolü ve bakanlık içi bir itiraz olarak “Üçüncü Dünyacılık”’, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 75:1 (2020), pp. 97–125.
72 Güvenç and Özel, ‘US–Turkey relations since World War II’, pp. 525–9.
73 Necmeddin Sadak, ‘Turkey faces the Soviets’, Foreign Affairs, 27:3 (1949), pp. 449–61.
74 William Hale, Turkish Foreign Policy since 1774 (London: Routledge, 2013), p. 106–18.
75 Eray Alim, ‘Turkey between the Third World and the West: Consequences of failing to strike the right balance (1961–1965)’, Middle East Critique, 31:3 (2022), pp. 285–302.
76 Kutlay and Öniş, ‘Turkish foreign policy in a post-Western order’.
77 Zeynep Gülşah Çapan and Ayşe Zarakol, ‘Postcolonial colonialism? The case of Turkey’, in Charlotte Epstein (ed.), Against International Relations Norms (Abingdon: Routledge, 2017), pp. 193–210.
78 Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı, ‘Çin’de Global Times ve Huánqiú Shíbào gazetelerinde yayımlanan makale’ (2 July 2019), available at: {https://www.tccb.gov.tr/makaleler/1898/106908/-turkiye-ve-cin-ortak-gelecek-vizyonu-paylasiyor-}.
79 US Department of State, ‘The United States sanctions Turkey under CAATSA 231’ (14 December 2020), available at: {https://2017-2021.state.gov/the-united-states-sanctions-turkey-under-caatsa-231/}.
80 War on the Rocks, ‘A chat with Britain’s top officer, Adm. Radakin’ (18 September 2023), available at: {https://warontherocks.com/2023/09/a-chat-with-britains-top-officer-adm-radakin/}.
81 Baykar, ‘Unmanned aerial vehicle systems’ (2022), available at: {https://www.baykartech.com/en/unmanned-aerial-vehicle-systems/}; Makine ve Kimya Endüstrisi, ‘E Fırtına HTS Fırtına Howitzer Integration’ (2023), available at: {https://urunler.mke.gov.tr/Urunler/E-F%C4%B1rt%C4%B1na-HTS-F%C4%B1rt%C4%B1na-Howitzer-Integration/28/1976}.
82 Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı, ‘Savunma sanayiinde tam bağımsız Türkiye hedefimize ulaşıncaya kadar çalışmayı sürdüreceğiz’ (28 July 2023), available at: {https://www.tccb.gov.tr/haberler/410/148963/-savunma-sanayiinde-tam-bagimsiz-turkiye-hedefimize-ulasincaya-kadar-calismayi-surdurecegiz-}.
83 Stephen Brooks and William Wohlforth, America Abroad: The United States’ Global Role in the 21st Century (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016).
84 Timothy Andrews Sayle, Enduring Alliance: A History of NATO and the Postwar Global Order (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2019).
85 Hurriyet Daily News, ‘Turkey blocks Israel from NATO summit’ (24 April 2012), available at: {https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkey-blocks-israel-from-nato-summit-19033}.
86 Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Millî Savunma Bakanlığı, ‘Millî Savunma Bakanı Hulusi Akar gazetecilerle birlikte “Milli Teknoloji ile Güçlenen Mehmetçiğin Yaşam Sergisi”ni gezdi’ (7 April 2021), available at: {https://www.msb.gov.tr/SlaytHaber/742021-32320}.
87 Bergsmann, ‘The concept of military alliance’.
88 Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı İletişim Başkanlığı, ‘President Erdoğan: We could never vote in “favour” of NATO membership for countries that support terrorism’ (29 May 2022), available at: {https://www.iletisim.gov.tr/turkce/haberler/detay/president-erdogan-we-could-never-vote-in-favour-of-nato-membership-for-countries-that-support-terrorism}.
89 Oles M. Smolansky, ‘Moscow and the Suez Crisis, 1956: A reappraisal’, Political Science Quarterly, 80:4 (1965), pp. 581–605.
90 G. John Ikenberry, ‘The end of liberal international order?’, International Affairs, 94:1 (2018), pp. 7–23 (p. 7).
91 Demetri Sevastopulo, ‘Aukus weighs expanding security pact to deter China in Indo-Pacific’, Financial Times (7 April 2024), available at: {https://www.ft.com/content/bd94b87a-0395-420b-a35c-909b1762650a}.
92 It must be noted that my theoretical framework would not consider a China-related dispute between the US and its Pacific allies as an externally caused one, but it would nevertheless shed some light on the relevant issue.