Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T20:33:07.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Participant expectations in a national otolaryngology mentorship programme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2022

R Abrar Open the ORCID record for R Abrar [Opens in a new window] ,
E Stapleton Open the ORCID record for E Stapleton [Opens in a new window]  and
Women in ENT Surgery
R Abrar*
Affiliation:
The Richard Ramsden Centre for Hearing Implants, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, London, UK
E Stapleton
Affiliation:
The Richard Ramsden Centre for Hearing Implants, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, London, UK
Women in ENT Surgery
Affiliation:
ENT UK, London, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Dr R Abrar, The Richard Ramsden Centre for Hearing Implants, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK E-mail: rohma.abrar@doctors.org.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Mentoring within surgery is increasingly recognised as a powerful development tool, but participant expectations have not previously been explored. This study aimed to explore and analyse participant expectations from the UK's first national otolaryngology mentorship programme.

Method

Participants completed open-ended questionnaires. Responses were qualitatively analysed using a grounded theory approach. Iterative cycles were used to develop codes using a constant comparison technique. Emerging categories were refined to identify core themes.

Results

Key mentee expectations were career, and clinical and academic guidance. Enhancing networking opportunities was highlighted by medical students and junior trainees. Psychosocial and lifestyle support were predominant themes for all trainees. Receiving impartial advice and guidance from outside their training region was expressed only by senior trainees. Mentor expectations aligned with those of mentees.

Conclusion

This study identified key areas of the ‘hidden curriculum’ for students and trainees in otolaryngology, showing the evolving expectations and priorities as they progress through training.

Keywords

OtolaryngologyMentoringQualitative Research
Type
Main Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 137 , Issue 6 , June 2023 , pp. 614 - 621
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Dr R Abrar takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

*

See Authorship section for full list of collaborators.

References

Royal College of Surgeons. Mentoring: A Guide to Good Practice. London: The Royal College of Surgeons, 2015Google Scholar
Wilkie, V. Leadership and management for all doctors. Br J Gen Pract 2012;62:230–1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinclair, P, Fitzgerald, JEF, Hornby, ST, Shalhoub, J. Mentorship in surgical training: current status and a needs assessment for future mentoring programs in surgery. World J Surg 2015;39:303–1310.1007/s00268-014-2774-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steven, A, Oxley, J, Fleming, WG. Mentoring for NHS doctors: perceived benefits across the personal-professional interface. J R Soc Med 2008;101:552–710.1258/jrsm.2008.080153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stamm, M, Buddeberg-Fischer, B. The impact of mentoring during postgraduate training on doctors’ career success. Med Educ 2011;45:488–9610.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03857.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singletary, SE. Mentoring surgeons for the 21st century. Ann Surg Oncol 2005;12:848–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Entezami, P, Franzblau, LE, Chung, KC. Mentorship in surgical training: a systematic review. Hand 2012;7:30–610.1007/s11552-011-9379-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurgel, RK, Schiff, BA, Flint, JH, Miller, RA, Zahtz, GD, Smith, RV et al. Mentoring in otolaryngology training programs. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;142:487–9210.1016/j.otohns.2009.12.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Indian Med Assoc 2009;107:403–5Google Scholar
Welch, JK, Patton, MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Mod Lang J 1992;76:543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sbaraini, A, Carter, SM, Evans, R, Blinkhorn, A. How to do a grounded theory study: a worked example of a study of dental practices. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011;11:128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, R. Mentoring for doctors. BMJ 2004;329:1910.1136/bmj.328.7431.s19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okereke, CD. Mentoring - the trainee's perspective. J Accid Emerg Med 2000;17:133–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaffer, U, Pennell, A, Musonda, P. General surgical trainee experiences of mentoring: a UK regional audit. J Surg Educ 2010;67:19–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, H, Isaac, A, Wright, ED, Alrajhi, Y, Seikaly, H. Formal mentorship in a surgical residency training program: a prospective interventional study. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;46:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, EL. Mentoring women in academic surgery: overcoming institutional barriers to success. J Natl Med Assoc 2006;98:1542–5Google ScholarPubMed
Patel, VM, Warren, O, Ahmed, K, Humphris, P, Abbasi, S, AShrafian, H et al. How can we build mentorship in surgeons of the future? ANZ J Surg 2011;81:418–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rashid, P, Narra, M, Woo, H. Mentoring in surgical training. ANZ J Surg 2015;85:225–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alisic, S, Boet, S, Sutherland, S, Bould, MD. A qualitative study exploring mentorship in anesthesiology: perspectives from both sides of the relationship. Can J Anesth 2016;63:851–6110.1007/s12630-016-0649-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, AH, Carli, LL. Women and the Labyrinth of Leadership. Brighton, USA: Harvard Business Press, 2007Google ScholarPubMed
Lin, SY, Laeeq, K, Malik, A, Varela, D, Thee, JS, Pillsbury, HC et al. Otolaryngology training programs: resident and faculty perception of the mentorship experience. Laryngoscope 2013;123:1876–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanfey, H, Hollands, C, Gantt, NL. Strategies for building an effective mentoring relationship. Am J Surg 2013;206:714–1810.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramani, S, Gruppen, L, Kachur, EK. Twelve tips for developing effective mentors. Med Teach 2006;28:404–810.1080/01421590600825326CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKenna, AM, Straus, SE. Charting a professional course: a review of mentorship in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 2011;8:109–1210.1016/j.jacr.2010.07.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huskins, WC, Silet, K, Weber-Main, AM, Begg, MD, Fwler, VG, Hamilton, J et al. Identifying and aligning expectations in a mentoring relationship. Clin Transl Sci 2011;4:439–4710.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00356.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macafee, DAL. Is there a role for mentoring in surgical specialty training? Med Teach 2008;30:55–910.1080/01421590701798711CrossRefGoogle Scholar