Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T18:23:12.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Association between mindfulness and risk and time preferences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Sébastien Duchêne
Affiliation:
Montpellier Business School, 2300 Avenue des Moulins, Montpellier, France
Marlène Guillon*
Affiliation:
Université de Montpellier, Montpellier Recherche en Economie, Avenue Raymond Dugrand, Montpellier, France
Ismaël Rafaï
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, AMSE, 5-9 Bd Maurice Bourdet, Marseille, France CEE-M, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Avenue Raymond Dugrand, Montpellier, France

Abstract

Many studies have investigated the role of socio-demographic factors (including gender, age, race), cognitive ability and cultural factors on time and risk preferences. Yet, research regarding the effect of mindfulness on risk and time preferences has been limited. This study investigates the association between mindfulness and time/risk preferences. We conducted a survey on a representative sample of the French adult population (N = 1154) in Spring 2020. We assessed individual mindfulness through the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), and measured time and risk preferences with incentive-compatible economic games as well as self-reported questionnaires. Our results suggest that a higher level of mindfulness is associated with higher risk aversion and patience for stated preferences, but we found no relationship for revealed ones. We also observe that a higher level of mindfulness is related to greater time consistency, as we found a negative and significant association between the MAAS and the present and future biases.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Economic Science Association 2024.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andreoni, J, Sprenger, C. (2012). Estimating time preferences from convex budgets. American Economic Review, 102, 7, 33333356. 10.1257/aer.102.7.3333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumeboonsuke, V, Caplanova, A. (2021). An analysis of impact of personality traits and mindfulness on risk aversion of individual investors. Current Psychology, 10.1007/s12144-021-02015-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azizi Ziabari, LS, Valikhani, A, Abouata Amlashi, M, Ireland, M. (2019). Patience mediates the relationship between mindfulness and pain in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 22, 3, 319329. 10.1080/13674676.2019.1622518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beranek, B, Cubitt, R, Gächter, S. (2015). Stated and revealed inequality aversion in three subject pools. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1, 4358. 10.1007/s40881-015-0007-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boccia, M, Piccardi, L, Guariglia, P. (2015). The meditative mind: A comprehensive meta-analysis of MRI studies. Biomed Research International, 2015, 419808. 10.1155/2015/419808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, H, Van der Pol, M. (2015). Intergenerational transfer of time and risk preferences. Journal of Economic Psychology, 49, 187204. 10.1016/j.joep.2015.06.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., Loverich, T. M., Biegel, G. M., & West, A. M. (2011). Out of the armchair and into the streets: Measuring mindfulness advances knowledge and improves interventions: Reply to Grossman. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, KW, Ryan, RM. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 4, 822. 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, GB, Coups, EJ. (1999). Time preferences and preventive health behavior: Acceptance of the influenza vaccine. Medical Decision Making, 19, 3, 307314. 10.1177/0272989X9901900309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charness, G, Garcia, T, Offerman, T, Villeval, MC. (2020). Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory?. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 60, 2, 99123. 10.1007/s11166-020-09325-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, MK. (2013). The effect of language on economic behavior: Evidence from savings rates, health behaviors, and retirement assets. American Economic Review, 103, 2, 690731. 10.1257/aer.103.2.690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daly, M, Harmon, CP, Delaney, L. (2009). Psychological and biological foundations of time preference. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7, 2–3, 659669. 10.2139/ssrn.1261459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohmen, T, Falk, A, Huffman, D, Sunde, U, Schupp, J, Wagner, GG. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9, 3, 522550. 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, A, Becker, A, Dohmen, T, Enke, B, Huffman, D, Sunde, U. (2018). Global evidence on economic preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133, 4, 16451692. 10.1093/qje/qjy013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fifer, S, Rose, J, Greaves, S. (2014). Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Is it a problem? And if so, how do we deal with it?. Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice, 61, 164177. 10.1016/j.tra.2013.12.010.Google Scholar
Frey, R, Pedroni, A, Mata, R, Rieskamp, J, Hertwig, R. (2017). Risk preference shares the psychometric structure of major psychological traits. Science Advances, 3, 10, e1701381. 10.1126/sciadv.1701381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gneezy, U, Potters, J. (1997). An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 2, 631645. 10.1162/003355397555217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, P. (2011). Defining mindfulness by how poorly I think I pay attention during everyday awareness and other intractable problems for psychology's (re) invention of mindfulness: comment on Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafenbrack, AC, Kinias, Z, Barsade, SG. (2014). Debiasing the mind through meditation: Mindfulness and the sunk-cost bias. Psychological Science, 25, 2, 369376. 10.1177/0956797613503853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hashemi, R, Moustafa, AA, Rahmati Kankat, L, Valikhani, A. (2018). Mindfulness and suicide ideation in Iranian cardiovascular patients: Testing the mediating role of patience. Psychological Reports, 121, 6, 10371052. 10.1177/0033294117746990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertwig, R, Wulff, DU, Mata, R. (2019). Three gaps and what they may mean for risk preference. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 374, 1766, 20180140. 10.1098/rstb.2018.0140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, CA, Laury, SK. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92, 5, 16441655. 10.1257/000282802762024700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölzel, BK, Carmody, J, Vangel, M, Congleton, C, Yerramsetti, SM, Gard, T, Lazar, SW. (2011). Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 191, 1, 3643. 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2005). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness (15th anniversary ed.). Delta Trade Paperback/Bantam Dell.Google Scholar
Kiken, LG, Shook, NJ. (2011). Looking up: Mindfulness increases positive judgments and reduces negativity bias. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 4, 425431. 10.1177/1948550610396585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 2, 443478. 10.1162/003355397555253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakey, CE, Campbell, WK, Brown, KW, Goodie, AS. (2007). Dispositional mindfulness as a predictor of the severity of gambling outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 7, 16981710. 10.1016/j.paid.2007.05.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lejuez, C, Read, J, Kahler, C, Richards, J, Ramsey, S, Stuart, G, Strong, D, Brown, R. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The balloon analogue risk task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75. 10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75.Google ScholarPubMed
Levenson, RW, Ekman, P, Ricard, M. (2012). Meditation and the startle response: A case study. Emotion, 12, 3, 650. 10.1037/a0027472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberman, N, Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1, 5. 10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima de Miranda, K. (2019). Mindfulness, preferences and well-being: Mindfulness predicts adolescents’ field behaviour (No. 2127). Kiel Working Paper. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/196139Google Scholar
List, JA, Gallet, CA. (2001). What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values?. Environmental and Resource Economics, 20, 241254. 10.1023/A:1012791822804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luberto, CM, Shinday, N, Song, R, Philpotts, LL, Park, ER, Fricchione, GL, Yeh, GY. (2018). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of meditation on empathy, compassion, and prosocial behaviors. Mindfulness, 9, 708724. 10.1007/s12671-017-0841-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mark, TL, Swait, J. (2004). Using stated preference and revealed preference modeling to evaluate prescribing decisions. Health Economics, 13, 6, 563573. 10.1002/hec.845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newberg, AB, Wintering, N, Khalsa, DS, Roggenkamp, H, Waldman, MR. (2010). Meditation effects on cognitive function and cerebral blood flow in subjects with memory loss: A preliminary study. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 20, 2, 517526. 10.3233/JAD-2010-1391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noussair, CN, Trautmann, ST, Van de Kuilen, G. (2014). Higher order risk attitudes, demographics, and financial decisions. Review of Economic Studies, 81, 1, 325355. 10.1093/restud/rdt032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyler, DL, Price-Blackshear, MA, Pratscher, SD, Bettencourt, BA. (2022). Mindfulness and intergroup bias: A systematic review. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 25, 4, 11071138. 10.1177/1368430220978694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peretti-Watel, P, Lharidon, O, Seror, V. (2013). Time preferences, socioeconomic status and smokers’ behaviour, attitudes and risk awareness. The European Journal of Public Health, 23, 5, 783788. 10.1093/eurpub/cks189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Picone, G., Sloan, F., & Taylor, D. (2004). Effects of risk and time preference and expected longevity on demand for medical tests. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 28, 3953. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41761129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafaï, I, Blayac, T, Dubois, D, Duchêne, S, Nguyen-Van, P, Ventelou, B, Willinger, M. (2023). Stated preferences outperform elicited preferences for predicting reported compliance with Covid-19 prophylactic measures. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 107, 102089. 10.1016/j.socec.2023.102089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagristano, MD, Trope, Y, Liberman, N. (2002). Time-dependent gambling: Odds now, money later. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 3, 364. 10.1037/0096-3445.131.3.364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schildberg-Hörisch, H. (2018). Are risk preferences stable?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32, 2, 135154. 10.1257/jep.32.2.135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, S, Yao, Z, Wei, J, Yu, R. (2015). Calm and smart? A selective review of meditation effects on decision making. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1059. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutter, M., Angerer, S., Glätzle-Rützler, D., & Lergetporer, P. (2015). The effect of language on economic behavior: Experimental evidence from children's intertemporal choices. IZA Discussion Paper No. 9383. ftp.iza.org/dp9383.pdfGoogle Scholar
Szrek, H, Chao, LW, Ramlagan, S, Peltzer, K. (2012). Predicting (un) healthy behavior: A comparison of risk-taking propensity measures. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 6, 716. 10.1017/S1930297500003260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, YY, Lu, Q, Geng, X, Stein, EA, Yang, Y, Posner, MI. (2010). Short-term meditation induces white matter changes in the anterior cingulate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 35, 1564915652. 10.1073/pnas.101104310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, YY, Ma, Y, Fan, Y, Feng, H, Wang, J, Feng, S, Fan, M. (2009). Central and autonomic nervous system interaction is altered by short-term meditation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 22, 88658870. 10.1073/pnas.0904031106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, YY, Ma, Y, Wang, J, Fan, Y, Feng, S, Lu, Q, Posner, MI. (2007). Short-term meditation training improves attention and self-regulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 43, 1715217156. 10.1073/pnas.0707678104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Dam, NT, Earleywine, M, Borders, A. (2010). Measuring mindfulness? An item response theory analysis of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 7, 805810. 10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, EU, Blais, AR, Betz, NE. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 4, 263290. 10.1002/bdm.414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y, Chen, ZJ, Lu, S, Ni, S. (2021). Are mindful people more risk-averse? Effects of trait and state mindfulness on risk preference in decision-making. International Journal of Psychology, 56, 3, 407414. 10.1002/ijop.12716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y, Chen, ZJ, Ni, S. (2020). The security of being grateful: Gratitude promotes risk aversion in decision-making. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15, 3, 285291. 10.1080/17439760.2019.1610483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Duchêne et al. supplementary material

Duchêne et al. supplementary material
Download Duchêne et al. supplementary material(File)
File 747.4 KB