More sensitive identification of psychotic experiences in common mental disorder by primary mental healthcare services – effect on prevalence and recovery: casting the net wider – CORRIGENDUM

Clare Knight; Debra Russo; Jan Stochl; Peter B. Jones; Jesus Perez

doi:10.1192/bjo.2020.151

More sensitive identification of psychotic experiences in common mental disorder by primary mental healthcare services – effect on prevalence and recovery: casting the net wider – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 January 2021

Clare Knight ,

Debra Russo ,

Jan Stochl ,

Peter B. Jones and

Jesus Perez

Article contents

Abstract
References

Rights & Permissions

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

Anxiety at-risk mental state common mental disorder depression psychotic experiences

Type: Corrigendum
Information: BJPsych Open , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , March 2021 , e42

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.151 [Opens in a new window]
Creative Commons: This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright: Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Soon after publication, the authors realised that Table 3 of this manuscript is not correct and must be changed. Unfortunately, during the review process a duplicate of Table 2, in a different format, replaced their original Table 3 and they overlooked this technical error. Thus, Table 3 must be replaced with the original one (below), which reflects the results as reported in both abstract and main text. They sincerely apologise for this error.

Table 3. Recovery rates for patients with and without psychotic experiences across three services delivering the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme.

CAPE-positive, scored ≥1.30 on the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE-P15); CAPE-negative, scored <1.30 on the CAPE-P15; CPFT, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust; NSFT, Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust; SPFT, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust.

References

Knight, C, Russo, D, Stochl, J, Jones, PB and Perez, J. More sensitive identification of psychotic experiences in common mental disorder by primary mental healthcare services – effect on prevalence and recovery: casting the net wider. BJPsych Open 2020; 6: e136.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Table 3. Recovery rates for patients with and without psychotic experiences across three services delivering the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme.