No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Collaborative relations and irresponsible purity: Herbert Mehrtens’ transformation of the historiography of science, medicine, technology and National Socialism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2024
Argument
By breaking decisively with the predominantly apologetic and hagiographic literature on science during National Socialism and employing compelling terms such as “irresponsible purity” and “collaborative relations,” Herbert Mehrtens profoundly influenced both his contemporaries and the subsequent generation of historians working in this field.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Science in Context , Volume 35 , Issue 4: Modernism in science and mathematics: A second look at Herbert Mehrtens , December 2022 , pp. 326 - 335
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Albrecht, Helmuth. 1993. “‘Max Planck: Mein Besuch bei Adolf Hitler’ - Anmerkungen zum Wert einer historischen Quelle.” In Naturwissenschaft und Technik in der Geschichte, edited by Albrecht, Helmuth, 41–63. Stuttgart: GNT Verlag.Google Scholar
Aly, Götz and Heim, Susanne. [1991] 2002. Architects of Annihilation: Auschwitz and the Logic of Destruction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ash, Mitchell. 2002. “Wissenschaft und Politik als Ressourcen für einander.” In Wissenschaften und Wissenschaftspolitik - Bestandsaufnahmen zu Formationen, Brüchen und Kontinuitäten im Deutschland des 20. Jahrhunderts, edited by Bruch, Rüdiger vom, 32–51. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner-Verlag.Google Scholar
Ash, Mitchell. 2006. “Wissenschaftswandlungen und politische Umbrüche im 20. Jahrhundert – was hatten sie miteinander zu tun?” In Kontinuitäten und Diskontinuitäten in der Wissenschaftsgeschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts, edited by Bruch, Rüdiger, Gerhardt, Uta, and Pawliczek, Aleksandra, 19–37. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Ash, Mitchell. 2010. “Die Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft im Nationalsozialismus.” NTM 18: 79–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baader, Gerhard and Schultz, Ulrich (eds). 1980. Medizin und Nationalsozialismus. Tabuisierte Vergangenheit – Ungebrochene Tradition? Dokumentation des Gesundheitstages Berlin. Berlin: Verlagsgesellschaft Gesundheit mbH.Google Scholar
Beyerchen, Alan. 1977. Scientists under Hitler: Politics and the Physics Community in the Third Reich. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Carson, Cathryn. 2010. Heisenberg in the Atomic Age: Science and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cassidy, David C. [1992] 2009. Beyond Uncertainty: Heisenberg, Quantum Physics, and The Bomb. New York: Bellevue Literary Press.Google Scholar
Deichmann, Ute. [1992] 1996. Biologists under Hitler. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Deichmann, Ute. [2007] 2012. “‘To the Duce, the Tenno and Our Führer: A Threefold Sieg Heil’: The German Chemical Society and the Association of German Chemists during the Nazi Era.” in The German Physical Society in the Third Reich: Physicists between Autonomy and Accommodation, edited by Hoffmann, Dieter and Walker, Mark, 280–316. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckart, Wolfgang. 2012. Medizin in der NS-Diktatur: Ideologie, Praxis, Folgen. Vienna: Böhlau.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Michael. 2019. Ludwig Prandtl: A Life for Fluid Mechanics and Aeronautical Research. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frei, Norbert. [1996] 1999. Vergangenheitspolitik. Die Anfänge der Bundesrepublik und die NS-Vergangenheit. Munich: Deutsche Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Haberer, Joseph. 1969. Politics and the Community of Science. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Heilbron, John L. [1986] 2000. The Dilemmas of an Upright Man: Max Planck and the Fortunes of German Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heim, Susanne. [2003] 2008. Plant Breeding and Agrarian Research in Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institutes 1933–1945: Calories, Caoutchouc, Careers. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Heim, Susanne, Sachse, Carola, and Walker, Mark. 2009. “The Kaiser Wilhelm Society under National Socialism.” In The Kaiser Wilhelm Society under National Socialism, edited by Heim, Susanne, Sachse, Carola, and Walker, Mark, 1–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hentschel, Klaus. [2005] 2007. The Mental Aftermath: The Mentality of German Physicists 1945–1949. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Dieter and Walker, Mark (eds). [2007] 2012. The German Physical Society in the Third Reich: Physicists between Autonomy and Accommodation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Karl-Heinz. 1974. Technik und Ingenieure im Dritten Reich. Düsseldorf Droste Verlag.Google Scholar
Maier, Helmut (ed). 2002. Rüstungsforschung im Nationalsozialismus. Organisation, Mobilisierung und Entgrenzung der Technikwissenschaften. Göttingen: Wallstein.Google Scholar
Maier, Helmut. 2007a. Forschung als Waffe. Rüstungsforschung in der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft und das Kaiser-Wilhelm Institut für Metallforschung 1900–1945/48, 2 Volumes. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.Google Scholar
Maier, Helmut (ed). 2007b. Gemeinschaftsforschung, Bevollmächtigte und der Wissentransfer. Die Rolle der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft im System kriegsrelevanter Forschung des Nationalsozialismus. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.Google Scholar
Mehrtens, Herbert. 1980. “Das ‘Dritte Reich’ in der Naturwissenschaftsgeschichte: Literaturbericht und Problemskizze.” In Naturwissenschaft, Technik und NS-Ideologie: Beiträge zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte des Dritten Reiches, edited by Herbert Mehrtens and Steffen Richter, 15–87. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Mehrtens, Herbert. 1990. “Verantwortungslose Reinheit: Thesen zur politischen und moralischen Struktur der mathematischen Wissenschaften am Beispiel des NS-Staates.” In Wissenschaft in der Verantwortung: Möglichkeiten der institutionellen Steuerung, edited by Georges Füllgraff and Annegret Falter, 37–54. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.Google Scholar
Mehrtens, Herbert. [1987] 1994a. “The Social System of Mathematics and National Socialism: A Survey.” In Science, Technology, and National Socialism, edited by Renneberg, Monika, and Walker, Mark, 291–311, 406–408. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mehrtens, Herbert. [1990] 1994b. “Irresponsible Purity: the Political and Moral Structure of Mathematical Sciences in the National Socialist State.” In Science, Technology, and National Socialism, edited by Renneberg, Monika and Walker, Mark, 342–338, 411–413. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mehrtens, Herbert. 1994c. “Kollaborationsverhältnisse: Natur- und Technikwissenschaften im NS-Staat und ihre Historie.” In Medizin, Naturwissenschaft, Technik und Nationalsozialismus. Kontinuitäten und Diskontinuitäten, edited by Meinel, Christoph and Voswinckel, Peter, 13–32. Stuttgart: GNT-Verlag.Google Scholar
Neufeld, Michael. 1995. The Rocket and the Reich: Peenemünde and the Coming of the Ballistic Missile Era. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Neufeld, Michael. 2007. Von Braun: Dreamer of Space, Engineer of War. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Poliakov, Leon and Wulf, Josef (eds). [1959] 2015. Das Dritte Reich und seine Denker. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rammer, Gerhard. 2010. “Allied Control of Physics and the Collegial Self-Determination of the Physicists.” In Physics and Politics: Research and Research Support in Twentieth Century Germany in International Perspective, edited by Trischler, Helmuth and Walker, Mark, 61–84. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Rammer, Gerhard. [2007] 2012. “‘Cleanliness among Our Circle of Colleagues’: The German Physical Society’s Policy toward Its Past.” in The German Physical Society in the Third Reich: Physicists between Autonomy and Accommodation, edited by Hoffmann, Dieter and Walker, Mark, 367–421. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Remmert, Volker. [2007] 2012. “The German Mathematical Association during the Third Reich: Professional Policy within the Web of National Socialist Ideology.” in The German Physical Society in the Third Reich: Physicists between Autonomy and Accommodation, edited by Hoffmann, Dieter and Walker, Mark, 246–279. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roelcke, Volker. [2009] 2014. “Sulfonamide Experiments on Prisoners in Nazi Concentration Camps: Coherent Scientific Rationality Combined with Complete Disregard of Humanity.” Human Subjects Research after the Holocaust, edited by Rubenfeld, Sheldon and Benedict, Susan, 51–66. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Sachse, Carola (ed). 2003. Die Verbindung nach Auschwitz: Biowissenschaften und Menschenversuche an Kaiser-Wilhelm-Instituten. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.Google Scholar
Sachse, Carola. [2002] 2012. “‘Whitewash Culture’: How the Kaiser Wilhelm/Max Planck Society Dealt with the Nazi Past.” In The Kaiser Wilhelm Society under National Socialism, edited by Heim, Susanne, Sachse, Carola, and Walker, Mark, 373–399. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sachse, Carola and Walker, Mark. 2005. “Introduction.” Politics and Science in Wartime: Comparative International Perspectives on the Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes [Volume 20 of Osiris], edited by Sachse, Carola and Walker, Mark, 1–20. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schmuhl, Hans-Walter (ed). 2003. Rassenforschung an Kaiser-Wilhelm-Instituten vor und nach 1933. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.Google Scholar
Schmuhl, Hans-Walter. [2005] 2008. The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics, 1927–1945: Crossing Boundaries. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Schüring, Michael. 2006. Minervas verstoßene Kinder. Vertriebene Wissenschaftler und die Vergangenheitspolitik der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. Göttingen: Wallstein.Google Scholar
Siegmund-Schultze, Reinhard. 2001. Rockefeller and the Internationalization of Mathematics between the Two World Wars: Documents and Studies for the Social History of Mathematics in the 20th Century. Basel: Birkhauser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegmund-Schultze, Reinhard. 2009. Mathematicians Fleeing from Nazi Germany: Individual Fates and Global Impact. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegmund-Schultze, Reinhard. 2011. “Bartel Leendert van der Waerden (1903–1996) im Dritten Reich: Moderne Algebra im Dienste des Anti-Modernismus?” “Fremde” Wissenschaftler im Dritten Reich. Die Debye-Affäre im Kontext, edited by Hoffmann, Dieter and Walker, Mark, 200–229. Göttingen: Wallstein.Google Scholar
Siegmund-Schultze, Reinhard. 2022. “From Lattices via Social History to Theories of Modernity in Mathematics: A Biographical Essay for Herbert Mehrtens (1946–2021).” Historia Mathematica 58:17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sime, Ruth Lewin. 2012. “The Politics of Forgetting: Otto Hahn and the German Nuclear-Fission Project in World War II.” Physics in Perspective 14: 59–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trischler, Helmuth. 1992. Luft- und Raumfahrtforschung in Deutschland 1900–1970. Politische Geschichte einer Wissenschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Walker, Mark. 1990. “Legenden um die deutsche Atombombe.” Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 38: 45–74.Google Scholar
Walker, Mark. 2024. Hitler’s Atomic Bomb: History, Legend, and the Twin Legacies of Auschwitz and Hiroshima. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Max. [1946] 1999. Hitler’s Professors: The Part of Scholarship in Germany’s Crimes against the Jewish People. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar