Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:02:06.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Formation of Norwegian Fjords

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

W. A. Don Munday*
Affiliation:
Tempe Crescent, North Vancouver, B.C.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1948

Sir,

Monsieur Koechlin’s explanation of the formation of Norwegian fjords (Journal of Glaciology, Vol.1, No. 2, 1947, p. 66) is contradictory on the subject of ice erosion: “Erosion,” he writes, “is slight in the accumulation areas, but increases greatly at lower levels …” “Erosion takes place uniformly throughout the bed of the ice stream, so that the glacier gradually sinks into the ground parallel to the surface.” These statements contradict each other and seem at variance with cirque-cutting, as well as ignoring the known fact that deposition of ground moraine often checks erosion altogether.

Perhaps the author’s theory is valid for Norway, but it will not harmonize with formation of fjord-like valleys in the Coast Range of British Columbia. Glaciers had their inception in the heads of valleys of a mature landscape; they lengthened, eroding the valleys on their way to the sea (a stage not touched on by the author). Another stage for which he did not provide was ice inundation, which often proceeded until valleys contained as much as 4000 ft. (1220 m.) of ice at their mouths.

In passing it may be pointed out that rock thresholds, where they exist in British Columbia inlets, are as easily explained by the ice being able to spread near valley mouths. Its erosive power is thus reduced and this seems at least as good an explanation as one which requires the presence of the sea. Moreover, many lakes have rock thresholds. Rock structure also must always be considered in relation to erosion.

Both statements which I have quoted imply that erosion is not related to the thickness of the ice. One hesitates to believe the author really meant this. I find no mention of the known fact that glaciation must be more prolonged in the upper reaches of any glacier. That is where the greatest supply of angular material to provide erosive tools must be found.

So far as the Coast Range of British Columbia is concerned it is believed the ice age ended rather abruptly. A few hundred feet below present-day alpine glaciers I have found well preserved horizontal striations of valley glaciers which were 4500 ft. (1370 m.) thick. There was also clear evidence that ice from the inland ice cap, not from the Coast Range, was the last to occupy the valley.