Introduction
The dielectric function of wet snow as a multi-phase heterogeneous system is, in general, controlled by the electric/dielectric properties, volume fractions of the components, the geometry and the distribution of the solid (ice) and liquid (water) constituents (Reference Polder and SantenPolder and van Santen, 1946; Reference SihvolaSihvola, 1988). At measurement frequencies in the range of 10 MHz to ≈1 GHz, snow permittivity is mostly controlled by snow density and wetness; it is not dependent on frequency itself. Effects of ionic conductivity or effects of size and shape of the ice grains or clusters can be neglected. The shape and type of distribution of the water component, however, shows only a small influence on snow permittivity (Reference DenothDenoth, 1982).
Neglecting the small effects of liquid water geometry, a relatively simple relation between snow permittivity ϵ, density ρ (g m−3) and volumetric water content W (Vol%) has been found experimentally (Denoth and others, Reference Denoth1984; Denoth, Reference Denoth1989):
Snow permittivity is measured using flat capacitive sensors to allow both near-surface and volume wetness determinations. The thickness of only 1.5 mm of the plate-like sensor offers a nearly non-destructive measurement. For electronic simplicity, a fixed measuring frequency of 20.00 MHz has been selected.
System electronics
The measuring system consists of two parts: the tuning and display unit and the sensor unit. The flat plate-like capacitive sensor is an integral part of the sensor unit, and is connected to the tuning unit by a cable. An extended block-diagram of system electronics is given in Figure 1.
The capacitive sensor (CS) is connected to a twin-T-bridge (TT) which operates at a frequency of 20.00 MHz. A diagram of the twin-T-bridge with appropriate values of the components is given in Figure 2a. Tuning of the bridge is made by a voltage-controlled variation of the capacity of two varactor diodes, D (BB 105 or equivalent types). The corresponding tuning voltages, Ul and U2, are applied alternatively. Tuning is automatically
controlled by a low-power microcomputer, whereby the sensor output signal is downconverted to a relatively low-frequency in the range of 12–14 kHz. This allows the application of relatively long cables (up to 3 m) for sensor connection to the control unit. The bridge has been optimized for precise and sensitive measurements of snow permittivity, ϵ’, whereby a reduced accuracy in the determination of dielectric losses, ϵ″, has been accepted. The tuning characteristics of the bridge with a sensor in air (ϵ’ = 1) are illustrated in Figure 2b. The sharp minimum in the tuning voltage U1(ϵ’) allows very accurate and sensitive measurements of ϵ’. The control unit has been designed for operation of up to four sensors simultaneously. Measured snow permittivity ϵ’ is displayed on a LCD and is also stored in a 32kB CMOS-RAM.
A V24 interface allows data transfer to a PC for further data processing. The stored data set has a header to display the date, time and the time interval of the measurement sequence. The time interval between successive measurements and the quantity of sensors to be operated can be preselected using an external PC (programmable control unit). The minimum time interval is 20 s per sensor operated; the maximum is 4h. The system is powered by a lead accumulator with a capacity of 1.3 Ah, which allows a continuous operation of approximately 10 h.
Calibration parameters of the capacitive sensors are determined experimentally using both solid and liquid standard dielectric materials. From two tuning operations, in air as a reference measurement (Uref, ϵ′ = 1). and in or on snow (U) snow permittivity is calculated according to
whereby k is the sensor-specific calibration factor. The reference measurement in air should be made with the sensor unit cooled down to snow temperature (0°C). In the range from −5° to +5°C sensor electronics is not sensitive to changes in ambient temperature; so the temperature coefficient of Uref is negligible small: ≤−0.2%K−1. Uref is stored in the RAM of the control
Unit and all subsequem measurements are referred to this value. The relative error in the determination of snow permittivity is E(ϵ′) ≌ 2%. A drawing of the sensor unit is shown in Figure 3; dimensions are given in millimeters. A photograph of the measurement system with two sensors connected to the control unii is shown in Figure 4.
Field measurements
Typical field applications of this new computerized snow wetness meter are long-term recordings of wetness variations with simultaneously operated sensors at different depths of a snow cover and the detection of rain- or meltwater waves in snow. The sensor should be inserted vertically into the snowpack otherwise, placed
horizontally, the sensor forms an impermeable layer and water percolation may be disturbed significantly. Figure 5 shows measurements of diurnal cycles in wetness variations of a natural snow cover (Seegrube, 2000 ma.s.l., March 1992; old snow with a mean grain-size of ≈0.5mm). Two sensors have been operated simultaneously at a depth of 18 and 40 cm, respectively. The
time interval between successive measurements has been preset to 30 min. The snow layer near the surface is characterized by relatively large and rapid changes in wetness, with a nearly constant value of W ≈ 0.6 Vol% overnight. Wetness at a depth of 40 cm shows a slow increase from 1 Vol% to approximately 1.5 Vol% during the 30 h measurement sequence, whereby no marked changes have been detected. Figure 6 shows the detection of percolating water waves in a natural snow cover (Stubai Alps, 3000 m a.s.l., July 1991; old coarse-grained snow with a mean grain-size of ≈1 mm). Snow wetness has been monitored near the snow surface (depth 10cm), and at a depth of 50 cm; measurements have been made at a 10 min lime interval. The uppermost snow layer shows marked wetness variations due to surface melting and freezing overnight. The percolating meltwater wave-was recorded by the other sensor with a time delay of approximately 3h. A short but heavy rainfall at the third day of wetness detection caused the formation of a marked water shock front.
Acknowledgements
The Wintersport Tirol AG is thanked for supporting in part the field activities in the Stubai Alps. The Österreichische Forschungsgemeinschaft is thanked for supporting presentation through grant no. 06/2204.