Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:52:57.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transgender Life and Persecution under the Nazi State: Gutachten on the Vollbrecht Case – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2023

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Corrigendum
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Central European History Society of the American Historical Association

The authors regret the inclusion of an error in the above manuscript. An earlier version incorrectly implied that the author's expert statement was submitted to a German court. The statement, for which the author was not compensated, was submitted to a lawyer arguing in the court case, but the lawyer did not ultimately submit it to the court.

This error resulted in two corrections which are detailed below:

In the 6th paragraph the following sentence ‘The public has a right to know how the court reached its decision and what the state of research on this issue is—even more so since the question of whether the Nazis persecuted transgender people is coming up more and more often, on Twitter and elsewhere’ has been updated to ‘The public has a right to know what the state of research on this issue is--even more so since the question of whether the Nazis persecuted transgender people is coming up more and more often, on Twitter and elsewhere’.

At the end of the 9th paragraph ‘what I wrote for the court’ has been updated to ‘the statement I provided to a lawyer in the case’.

The original manuscript has been updated.

The author apologizes for this error.