Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T02:32:11.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Risk factors associated with acute in-hospital delirium for patients diagnosed with a hip fracture in the emergency department

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2018

Cameron Thompson
Affiliation:
Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute, Toronto, ON Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON
Vince J.M. Brienza
Affiliation:
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON.
Aislinn Sandre
Affiliation:
Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute, Toronto, ON Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON
Sean Caine
Affiliation:
Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute, Toronto, ON Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON.
Bjug Borgundvaag
Affiliation:
Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute, Toronto, ON Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
Shelley McLeod*
Affiliation:
Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute, Toronto, ON Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
*
Correspondence to: Dr. Shelley McLeod, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 206-600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective

The primary objective was to identify risk factors independently associated with acute in-hospital delirium within 72 hours of emergency department (ED) arrival for patients diagnosed with a hip fracture.

Methods

This was a retrospective chart review of patients ages 65 years and older presenting to one of two academic EDs with a discharge diagnosis of a hip fracture from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2015. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine variables independently associated with the development of acute in-hospital delirium within 72 hours of ED arrival.

Results

Of the 668 included patients, 181 (27.1%) developed delirium within 72 hours of ED arrival. History of neurodegenerative disease or dementia (odds ratio [OR]: 5.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9, 8.4), age > 75 (OR: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.4, 5.6), and absence of analgesia (no opioid or nerve block) in the ED (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.3, 3.2) were independently associated with the development of acute in-hospital delirium; 525 (78.6%) patients received opioid analgesia in the ED. The most common analgesics used in the ED were intravenous (IV) morphine (35.8%), IV hydromorphone (35.2%), or dual therapy with both IV hydromorphone and IV morphine (2.2%). Femoral nerve blocks were initiated for 36 (5.4%) patients and successfully completed in 35 (5.2%) patients in the ED.

Conclusions

Advanced age and signs of dementia or neurodegenerative disease are predictors of 72-hour delirium that can be screened for during triage. Improved pain control in the ED may reduce the risk of acute in-hospital delirium.

Résumé

Objectif

L’étude avait pour objectif principal de cerner des facteurs de risque indépendants d’apparition d’un état confusionnel aigu à l’hôpital, associés à une fracture de la hanche, dans les 72 heures suivant l’arrivée au service des urgences (SU).

Méthode

Il s’agit d’un examen rétrospectif de dossiers de patients âgés de 65 ans et plus, et traités dans l’un des SU universitaires participants, pour une fracture de la hanche avérée, du 1er janvier 2014 au 31 décembre 2015. Une analyse de régression logistique plurifactorielle a servi à déterminer des variables indépendantes associées à l’apparition d’un état confusionnel aigu à l’hôpital, dans les 72 heures suivant l’arrivée au SU.

Résultats

Sur 668 patients sélectionnés, un état confusionnel aigu s’est développé dans les 72 heures suivant l’arrivée au SU, chez 181 d’entre eux (27,1 %). Des antécédents de maladie neurodégénérative ou de démence (risque relatif approché [RRA] : 5,7; IC à 95 % : 3,9-8,4), un âge>75 ans (RRA : 2,8; IC à 95 % : 1,4-5,6) et l’absence d’analgésie (pas d’opioïdes ou de bloc nerveux) au SU (RRA : 2,1; IC à 95 % : 1,3-3,2) se sont révélés des facteurs de risque indépendants d’état confusionnel aigu à l’hôpital. Ainsi, 525 patients (78,6 %) ont reçu des opioïdes au SU. Les analgésiques les plus utilisés au SU étaient la morphine par voie intraveineuse (i.v.) (35,8 %), l’hydromorphone i.v. (35,2 %) ou la bithérapie composée d’hydromorphone i.v. et de morphine i.v. (2,2 %). Une anesthésie par bloc fémoral a été pratiquée chez 36 patients (5,4 %) et réussie chez 35 (5,2 %) d’entre eux, au SU.

Conclusion

Un âge avancé et des signes de démence ou de maladie neurodégénérative sont des facteurs prévisionnels d’apparition, dans les 72 heures suivant l’arrivée à l’hôpital, d’un état confusionnel aigu, pouvant être dépistés au moment du triage. Par ailleurs, une amélioration du soulagement de la douleur au SU peut diminuer le risque d’apparition d’un état confusionnel aigu à l’hôpital.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2018 

CLINICIAN’S CAPSULE

What is known about the topic?

Delirium, or acute confusion, occurs in up to 62% of patients who have experienced a hip fracture.

What did this study ask?

What risk factors are associated with acute in-hospital delirium for ED patients diagnosed with a hip fracture?

What did this study find?

History of neurodegenerative disease or dementia, age>75 years, and absence of analgesia in the ED were associated with acute in-hospital delirium.

Why does this study matter to clinicians?

Although many variables associated with delirium may not be easily modified, more careful attention to ED pain management and the provision of better analgesia are important.

INTRODUCTION

More than 35,000 Canadians experience a hip fracture each year, of whom the majority are over the age of 65 years living with osteoporosis and various other comorbidities.Reference Riddell, Ospina and Holroyd-Leduc 1 For these individuals, a hip fracture can be a catastrophic event that precipitates a steep decline in health and independence. Delirium, or acute confusion, occurs in up to 62% of patients who have experienced a hip fracture.Reference Zywiel, Hurley and Perruccio 2 Patients with delirium are significantly more likely to have a longer hospital length of stay and an increased risk of falls, pressure sores, nursing home admission, and unexpected death.Reference Riddell, Ospina and Holroyd-Leduc 1 Reference Rosen, Connors and Clark 3

Previous studies have attempted to identify risk factors associated with postoperative delirium in elderly patients.Reference Inouye, Viscoli and Horwitz 4 Reference Bruce, Ritchie and Blizard 8 Cognitive impairment, history of dementia, advanced age, multiple comorbidities, malnutrition, baseline functional dependence, living in an institution or nursing home, visual impairment, hearing deficiency, functional impairment and psychoactive drug use, such as narcotics, benzodiazepines, and medications with anticholinergic properties, have all been associated with the development of postoperative delirium.Reference Inouye, Viscoli and Horwitz 4 , Reference Yang, Zhao and Dong 5 , Reference Han, Wilson and Ely 9 , Reference Han, Zimmerman and Cutler 10 However, these studies did not specifically address factors related to emergency department (ED) management and did not exclusively include hip fracture patients.

Untreated pain has also been associated with delirium in older adults undergoing elective surgery.Reference Morrison, Magaziner and Gilbert 6 , Reference Morrison, Magaziner and Koval 11 Current methods of providing analgesia include acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), oral or parenteral opioids, and regional anesthesia techniques.Reference Abou-Setta, Beaupre and Rashiq 12 Monotherapy with acetaminophen alone is often insufficient for the majority of hip fracture patients, and NSAIDs are largely contraindicated in this elderly patient group due to concerns regarding side effects. Opioids provide reasonable analgesia at rest but are relatively ineffective for dynamic pain, and side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, and over sedation, are common. Regional anesthesia offers an attractive alternative to systemic opioids for hip fracture patients, but femoral nerve blocks are infrequently used by emergency physicians due to the need for specialized equipment and training and the time required to perform this procedure in a busy ED setting.Reference Morrison, Dickman and Hwang 13

The primary objective of this study was to identify risk factors independently associated with acute in-hospital delirium within 72 hours of ED arrival for patients diagnosed with a hip fracture. A secondary objective was to describe the ED pain management of patients with a hip fracture.

METHODS

Study design, setting, and population

This was a retrospective chart review of patients ages 65 years and older presenting to one of two academic EDs (an academic teaching ED with an annual census of 60,000 and a university-affiliated community hospital ED with an annual census of 100,000) in Toronto, Ontario, with an ED diagnosis of a hip fracture (intertrochanteric fracture, cervicotrochanteric fracture, subtrochanteric fracture, or other/unspecific fracture of the femoral neck/head; ICD-10 codes S72.0, S72.1, S72.2, S72.8, and S72.9. ) over a 2-year study period (January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2015). Patients were excluded if they were under the age of 65 years, did not undergo surgery for a hip fracture, had a missing ED record, were falsely labelled as having an acute hip fracture, if they were a patient in palliative care, or if they left the ED against medical advice. We excluded patients who did not undergo surgery for hip fracture repair because we had no way of following/contacting them to determine the primary outcome of delirium within 72 hours if they were not admitted to the hospital. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Board at both institutions.

Study protocol

Using a computerized, structured, data abstraction form, trained research personnel reviewed the medical records and extracted patient demographics such as age, gender, and comorbidities. Comorbidities were categorized as cardiovascular (e.g., congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, history of stroke), hypertension, bone health (e.g., osteoporosis and osteoarthritis), diabetes, hormonal (e.g., hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, and Cushing disease), mental health (e.g., depression and schizophrenia) substance use disorder, and neurodegenerative (e.g., Parkinson disease and Alzheimer disease) or dementia. Triage vital signs (i.e., heart rate, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, temperature, and pain score) and the Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) score were also recorded. If a variable was not recorded in the chart, this was coded as absent. Any analgesic and anti-nausea medications administered in the ED and regional anesthesia (femoral nerve block) performed in the ED and in-hospital were recorded. Additionally, the anesthetic used for surgery and any complications occurring during surgery or in-hospital were recorded, along with total hospital length of stay. Prior to data extraction, all study variables were defined by the research team. Periodic meetings with chart abstractors and study team investigators were held to resolve disputes and monitor performance. Fifty charts were independently reviewed by two study investigators to ensure consistency in the delirium assessment.

Outcomes

The primary outcome of delirium within was defined as a positive Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) scoreReference Inouye, van Dyck and Alessi 14 – a tool used to assess acute confusion or delirium, or a documented change from baseline cognitive status in any of the ED physician, nursing, or inpatient nursing notes through the mention of “delirious,” “altered level of consciousness,” “agitated,” or “acute confusion.” This was consistent with the definition used by Morrison et al., and attempts to account for the vagueness of delirium reporting.Reference Morrison, Magaziner and Gilbert 6 We chose to use documented delirium within 72 hours of ED arrival to better capture incidences that could have been affected or influenced by the patients’ ED management. We chose a 72-hour time period for several practical reasons. We wanted to ensure that there was reasonable proximity to ED arrival, but also allow adequate time to ensure that all patients had their surgery and to account for anesthetic effects to wear off prior to the determination of our primary outcome. A secondary objective was to describe the ED pain management of patients with a hip fracture.

Sample size

To estimate the sample size required for the multivariable regression model, the formula by Peduzzi et al. (1996) was used, N=10k/p, where p is the estimated proportion of patients who will develop delirium within 72 hours, and k is the number of covariates (independent variables) to be included in the model.Reference Peduzzi, Concato and Kemper 15 Based on a priori knowledge of delirium risk factors, it was unlikely that more than 12 covariates would be included in the final model. We estimated that 25% of ED patients with a hip fracture would experience delirium within 72 hours of ED arrival, consistent with previous studies,Reference Morrison, Magaziner and Gilbert 6 , Reference Bruce, Ritchie and Blizard 8 , Reference Oh, Sieber and Leoutsakos 16 resulting in an estimated sample size of 480 patients.

Data analysis

Baseline variables of the study cohort were described using descriptive statistics and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using standard equations. Inter-rater agreement of delirium was estimated using Cohen’s kappa (k) statistic for the first 50 charts reviewed, with k < 0.20 interpreted as “poor agreement”; k = 0.21 to 0.40 interpreted as “fair agreement”; 0.41 to 0.60 interpreted as “moderate agreement”; k = 0.61 to 0.80 interpreted as “good agreement”; and k > 0.80 interpreted as “very good agreement.”

Data elements were chosen with the intent of evaluating variables for model inclusion based on what is known about the epidemiology of the disease process as well as hypothesized relationships between potential independent variables and delirium. Univariable analyses were used to determine the strength of association between each variable and the primary outcome. Variables found to be independently associated with delirium (p < 0.1) were used as initial input into a multivariable model. A variable representing hospital site was included in the multivariable model. Backwards, stepwise multivariable logistic regression (Wald removal criterion of 0.1) was used to determine predictor variables independently associated with delirium. Likelihood ratio tests were used to determine appropriate inclusion of variables in the multivariable model. The Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic was examined to determine how well the final model described the response variable. Model discrimination was assessed by examining the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. All data analyses were performed using Stata 13 (StataCorp. 2013. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP).

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 750 ED patients with a hip fracture between the two sites. Eighty-two patients were excluded, leaving 668 patients included in the analyses (Figure 1). Patient demographics are presented in Table 1. Of the total number of patients, 181 (27.1%) patients diagnosed with a hip fracture from the ED developed delirium within 72-hours of ED arrival. The inter-rater agreement of delirium for the first 50 charts reviewed was 1.0, indicating perfect agreement.

Figure 1 Flow diagram of included patients.

Table 1 Characteristics and emergency department demographics of included patients

* Variables considered for multivariable logistic regression model.

ED = emergency department; IQR = interquartile range; meq = morphine equivalents; mm Hg = millimeters of mercury; OR = operating room; SBP = systolic blood pressure.

Abnormal SBP defined as < 90 or > 140 mm Hg.

Abnormal temperature defined as < 36.1oC or > 37.2oC.

Abnormal heart rate defined as < 60 or > 100 beats per minute.

Median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of all included patients was 85 (79, 90) years. Median ED length of stay was similar between patients with and without delirium (4.8 v. 4.4 hours; ∆ 0.4; 95% CI: -0.1 to 0.9 hours). Median time from triage to the operating room was also similar between groups (26.6 hours v. 26.7 hours; ∆ 0.1; 95% CI: -2.3 to 2.5 hours). Patients who developed delirium had a longer hospital length of stay compared with patients who did not develop delirium (12.8 v. 10.1 days; ∆ 2.7; 95% CI: 1.9 to 4.5 days). Overall, 138 (20.6%) hip fracture patients did not receive either opioid analgesic or regional anesthesia while in the ED.

Results of the univariable model showing variables associated with delirium within 72-hours from ED arrival for patients presenting to the ED with a hip fracture can be viewed in Table 2. History of neurodegenerative disease or dementia (odds ratio [OR]: 5.7, 95% CI: 3.9 to 8.4), age > 75 years (OR: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.4 to 5.6), and absence of analgesia (no opioid or nerve block) in the ED (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.3 to 3.2) were independently associated with acute in-hospital delirium in the multivariable logistic regression model (Table 3). The model achieved good discrimination (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve = 0.76), and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit chi-squared value was 3.77 (p = 0.44), indicating that the model was well fit to the data.

Table 2 Results of the univariable model showing variables associated with delirium within 72-hours from ED arrival for patients presenting to the ED with a hip fracture

CI = confidence interval; ED = emergency department; meq = morphine equivalents; OR = odds ratio.

Table 3 Results of the multivariable regression model showing independent predictors of delirium within 72 hours from ED arrival for patients presenting to the ED with a hip fracture

CI = confidence interval; ED = emergency department; OR = odds ratio.

The majority of patents (78.5%) received opioid analgesia while in the ED; the most common prescribed were hydromorphone and morphine. Patients who developed delirium with 72 hours of ED arrival were less likely to receive any pain management in the ED (68.5% receiving analgesia v. 83.6% in the no-delirium group; ∆ 15.1%; 95% CI: 7.8% to 22.8%). Patients who received ≥ 1.5 mg of morphine equivalents of analgesics per hour in the ED were significantly less likely to develop delirium within 72 hours of ED arrival. Femoral nerve blocks were rarely performed by ED physicians (35/668; 5.2%). The complete summary of pain management for patients with and without delirium is presented in Table 4.

Table 4 Emergency department pain management of included patients

IQR = interquartile range; meq = morphine equivalents.

* Significance.

95% confidence interval could not be calculated due to n = 1 in one cell.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study suggest that hip fracture patients older than 75 years and those with a history of neurodegenerative disease or dementia are at increased risk for the development of delirium within 72 hours of ED arrival. Our findings also suggest that patients given no analgesia (no opioid or nerve block) in the ED are at increased risk of in-hospital delirium. Patients who developed delirium had a longer hospital length of stay compared with patients who did not develop delirium (12.8 v. 10.1 days; ∆ 2.7; 95% CI: 1.9 to 4.5 days). These patients should be viewed with increased caution in the ED, with extra care taken to screen for delirium and provide optimal pain management. Receiving opioid medications at a rate of at least 1.5 mg of meq per hour significantly reduced the likelihood of developing delirium; however, the optimal dose of opioids for prevention of delirium is not known.

Previous studies have attempted to identify risk factors associated with patients who are at higher risk of postoperative delirium following a hip fracture repair.Reference Inouye, Viscoli and Horwitz 4 Reference Bruce, Ritchie and Blizard 8 A recent systematic review by Yang et al. included 24 studies with a total of 5,364 patients with a hip fracture. Reported patients with preoperative cognitive impairment ([OR] 3.21; 95% CI: 2.26 to 4.56), advanced age (standardized mean difference 0.50; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.67), living in an institution (OR 2.94; 95% CI: 1.65 to 5.23), heart failure (OR 2.46; 95% CI: 1.72 to 3.53), total hip arthroplasty (OR 2.21; 95% CI: 1.16 to 4.22), multiple comorbidities (OR 1.37; 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.68), and postoperative morphine usage (OR 3.01; 95% CI: 1.30 to 6.94) were more likely to sustain delirium after hip surgery. Females were less likely to develop delirium after hip surgery (OR 0.83; 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.98).Reference Yang, Zhao and Dong 5 The OR (3.01; 95% CI: 1.30, 6.94) reported by Yang et al. was a pooled estimate derived from postoperative studies and did not address a possible dose-response relationship between opioid dose and delirium. The results of previous studies on the opioid-delirium association are inconsistent; inadequate dosing of opioids may result in pain-related delirium, whereas excessive dosing may be as likely to result in confusion. Our study was restricted to pain management for hip fracture patients while in the ED.

Oh et al. conducted a systematic review to identify preoperative clinical risk factors associated with postoperative delirium in individuals undergoing hip fracture repair to help clinicians identify high-risk patients upon admission. After adjusting for other suspected risk factors in multivariable models, cognitive impairment was one of the most important preoperative risk factors for delirium after hip fracture surgery, followed by body mass index, albumin levels, and multiple comorbidities. The authors concluded that a careful preoperative assessment of cognitive function would be most important in identifying patients at the highest risk of postoperative delirium; however, further study is required to determine whether early identification of these risk factors improves patient outcomes.Reference Oh, Sieber and Leoutsakos 16

Although baseline cognitive impairment is an important risk factor for postoperative delirium, cognitive assessment is not routinely conducted prior to emergency hip fracture repair. Amongst older adults in the ED, delirium typically occurs as the hypoactive variety where patients may appear depressed, sedated, or lethargic and therefore easily missed if not routinely screened for.Reference Yang, Zhao and Dong 5 , Reference Morrison, Magaziner and Gilbert 6 Although there are several delirium screening tools available, they are not well known by ED clinicians; it remains unclear at which stage they should be administered, and delirium screening is perceived to be too time-consuming to be performed in the ED.Reference Han, Zimmerman and Cutler 10 However, many studies, including those in the systematic review by Oh et al., demonstrate the feasibility of preoperative cognitive testing in the ED setting.Reference Oh, Sieber and Leoutsakos 16

It has been suggested that cognitive testing should become part of the standard of care for preoperative assessment for hip fracture surgery and should be screened for during the patient’s initial ED assessment. It has been recommended that delirium screening occurs at least once every 12 hours while the patient is in hospital, after transitions between in-patient settings, and upon any change in medical status. 17 However, in our study, only one site used the CAM score to screen for acute confusion at triage, with only 28.4% of patients having a completed CAM score recorded, suggesting future efforts should focus on initiatives to improve delirium screening compliance by ED personnel. Early identification of confusion through routine delirium screening would allow for hospital-based delirium prevention approaches, which could be implemented in the ED. Examples of such strategies include orienting the patient to person, place, and time (involving family and caregivers when possible); creating an environment that provides context (a room with a clock); ensuring use of glasses/hearing aids as appropriate; and optimizing the use of drugs associated with delirium.Reference Inouye, Viscoli and Horwitz 4 , Reference Han, Zimmerman and Cutler 10

In our study, patients who did not develop delirium received a higher dose of opioid analgesia compared with those who developed delirium. However, controlling pain is often challenging in this population due to advanced patient age, decreased cognitive function, and various comorbidities.Reference Rosen, Connors and Clark 3 , Reference Morrison, Magaziner and Gilbert 6 Abou-Setta et al. conducted a systematic review of the comparative effectiveness of pain management strategies for hip fracture and found evidence from four randomized controlled trials (n = 461) and two cohort studies (n = 634) to suggest that nerve blocks are effective for relieving acute pain and reducing delirium in hip fracture patients.Reference Abou-Setta, Beaupre and Rashiq 12 The authors also concluded that perioperative use of regional anesthesia independently reduced the severity and duration of delirium and that preoperative administration was more effective than postoperative administration. Although our study indicated that improved analgesia reduced the incidence of delirium amongst older hip fracture patients, regional anesthesia was rarely used, and we had insufficient data to determine the effectiveness of femoral nerve blocks in preventing delirium.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, we can only report what was documented in the patient record. The primary outcome of delirium was defined as a positive CAM score, or a documented change from baseline cognitive status in any of the ED physician, nursing, or inpatient nursing notes through the mention of “delirious,” “altered level of consciousness,” “agitated,” or “acute confusion.” Due to the retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to differentiate between prevalent delirium (arrived with delirium) and incident delirium (developed after arriving in the ED). It may be possible that some patients experienced delirium, which was undocumented in the chart and therefore not captured in our study. Alternatively, it is possible that psychiatric symptoms might have been misclassified as “delirium” when patients were severely ill or suffering from dementia (false-positive), as has been shown by Inouye et al.Reference Inouye, Leo-Summers and Zhang 18

The impact of ED management may have been confounded by inpatient variables, including the surgery; however, our interest was in establishing the impact of analgesia provided during the ED stay. We chose a 72-hour time period for several practical reasons. We wanted to ensure there was reasonable proximity to ED arrival, but also allow adequate time to ensure that all patients had their surgery, and to account for anesthetic effects to wear off prior to the determination of our primary outcome.

Due to the low number of regional nerve blocks performed by ED physicians, we were unable to independently investigate the association between femoral nerve blocks and incidence of delirium. Additionally, CAM scores were used at only one of the two included sites, so the incidence of delirium may not have been consistently documented between the two hospitals. It is also possible that some of the observed variation in the collected data were influenced by error or bias from the data abstractor, who was not blinded to the objective of this descriptive study. The data included in this study are from 2014 to 2015, but we do not believe that the pain management for ED hip fracture patients has changed. Finally, this was a small study, and physician practice was limited to two hospitals. Although clinical management strategies appeared similar across a large number of physicians at both institutions, our findings may not be generalizable to other settings.

CONCLUSIONS

History of neurodegenerative disease or dementia, age > 75 years, and absence of analgesia (no opioid or nerve block) in the ED were risk factors independently associated with acute in-hospital delirium within 72 hours of ED arrival for patients diagnosed with a hip fracture. The results of this study suggest that patients at an advanced age and those with a history of neurodegenerative disease or dementia are at increased risk for confusion, which complicates and prolongs hospital length of stay. Although many variables associated with delirium may not be easily modified, more careful attention to ED pain management and the provision of better analgesia are important. Our findings indicate that appropriate pain management in the ED, through the use of opioid medications or regional anesthesia, may reduce the risk of in-hospital delirium for patients diagnosed with a hip fracture. Delirium may be a preventable condition amenable to hospital-based prevention strategies, which could be implemented in the ED.

Competing interests: None declared.

References

REFERENCES

1. Riddell, M, Ospina, M, Holroyd-Leduc, JM. Use of femoral nerve blocks to manage hip fracture pain among older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review. CJEM 2016;18(4):245-252.Google Scholar
2. Zywiel, MG, Hurley, RT, Perruccio, AV, et al. Health economic implications of perioperative delirium in older patients after surgery for a fragility hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015;97:829-836.Google Scholar
3. Rosen, T, Connors, S, Clark, S, et al. Assessment and management of delirium in older adults in the emergency department: literature review to inform development of a novel clinical protocol. Adv Emerg Nurs J 2015;37(3):183-E3.Google Scholar
4. Inouye, SK, Viscoli, CM, Horwitz, RI, et al. A predictive model for delirium in hospitalized elderly medical patients based on admission characteristics. Ann Intern Med 1993;119(6):474-481.Google Scholar
5. Yang, Y, Zhao, X, Dong, T, et al. Risk factors for postoperative delirium following hip fracture repair in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Clin Exp Res 2017;29:115-126.Google Scholar
6. Morrison, RS, Magaziner, J, Gilbert, M, et al. Relationship between pain and opioid analgesics on the development of delirium following hip fracture. J Gerontol 2003;58(1):76-81.Google Scholar
7. Lee, HB, Mears, SC, Rosenberg, PB, et al. Predisposing factors for post-operative delirium after hip fracture repair among patients with and without dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011;59(12):2306-2313.Google Scholar
8. Bruce, AJ, Ritchie, CW, Blizard, R, et al. The incidence of delirium associated with orthopedic surgery: a meta-analytic review. Int Psychogeriatr 2007;19(2):197-214.Google Scholar
9. Han, JH, Wilson, A, Ely, EW. Delirium in the older emergency department patient – a quiet epidemic. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2010;28(3):611-631.Google Scholar
10. Han, JH, Zimmerman, EE, Cutler, N, et al. Delirium in older emergency department patients: recognition, risk factors, and psychomotor subtypes. Acad Emerg Med 2009;16(3):193-200.Google Scholar
11. Morrison, RS, Magaziner, J, Koval, KJ, et al. The impact of post-operative pain on outcomes following hip fracture. Pain 2003;103:303-311.Google Scholar
12. Abou-Setta, AM, Beaupre, LA, Rashiq, S, et al. Comparative effectiveness of pain management interventions for hip fracture: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2011;155(4):234-245.Google Scholar
13. Morrison, RS, Dickman, E, Hwang, U, et al. Regional nerve blocks improve pain and functional outcomes in hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2016;64(12):2433-2439, doi: 10.1111/jgs.14386.Google Scholar
14. Inouye, SK, van Dyck, CH, Alessi, CA, et al. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med 1990;113(12):941-948.Google Scholar
15. Peduzzi, P, Concato, J, Kemper, E, et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49(12):1373-1379.Google Scholar
16. Oh, ES, Sieber, FE, Leoutsakos, J, et al. Sex differences in hip fracture surgery: preoperative risk factors for delirium and postoperative outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 2016;64:1616-1621.Google Scholar
17. Health Quality Ontario, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Care for people with fragility fractures: Health Quality Ontario; 2017. Available at: http://www.hqontario.ca/Evidence-to-Improve-Care/Quality-Standards/View-all-Quality-Standards/Hip-Fracture (last accessed 23 March 2018).Google Scholar
18. Inouye, SK, Leo-Summers, L, Zhang, Y, et al. A chart-based method for identification of delirium: validation compared with interviewer ratings using the Confusion Assessment Method. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53(2):312-318.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Flow diagram of included patients.

Figure 1

Table 1 Characteristics and emergency department demographics of included patients

Figure 2

Table 2 Results of the univariable model showing variables associated with delirium within 72-hours from ED arrival for patients presenting to the ED with a hip fracture

Figure 3

Table 3 Results of the multivariable regression model showing independent predictors of delirium within 72 hours from ED arrival for patients presenting to the ED with a hip fracture

Figure 4

Table 4 Emergency department pain management of included patients