Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T17:36:18.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-diagnosing bipolar disorder: questions for clinicians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Avneet Sharma
Affiliation:
Blackberry Hill Hospital, Bristol, UK, email: [email protected]
Jitender Kumar
Affiliation:
Fulbourne Hospital, Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an open-access article published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2015

It is not uncommon in psychiatry to receive referrals for patients who believe they have bipolar affective disorder. This has been explained partly by a trend of celebrities openly talking about having bipolar disorder along with an explosion of information about bipolar illness on the internet. Reference Chan and Sireling1

We analysed the records of 46 patients who over a 3-year period requested referral to a community mental health team seeking a diagnosis of bipolar illness. The patients were predominantly young women (mean age 32 years, female:male ratio 31:15). Clinically, they presented with problems of anxiety and low mood with a history of mood swings (90%), racing thoughts (70%), impulsivity (100%) and overactivity (60%). All patients had visited a website offering self-assessment for bipolar illness and reported scores being highly suggestive of a bipolar illness – this had influenced their decision to seek referral. Around 25% of patients reported seeing a TV programme featuring a celebrity talking about their bipolar illness. Five patients, of their own accord, had joined their local Bipolar UK support group before the assessment.

None of the patients were given the diagnosis of bipolar illness at initial assessment. All were given formulations about their problems in terms of mood swings, coping and lifestyle issues. The ICD-10 diagnostic categories were mixed anxiety depression/adjustment disorder/dysthymia (20 patients); emotionally unstable personality disorder (10); alcoholism/alcohol misuse (5); no psychiatric diagnosis (11). About a third of patients, after having their history taken, readily agreed at the end of the first meeting that they were not suffering from a bipolar illness. Five patients asked for a second opinion; all were experiencing relationship problems.

Our experience highlights the issues that may be encountered while assessing patients who actively seek diagnosis of a bipolar illness. There is merit in taking the patient into confidence about the confusion surrounding diagnosing bipolar illness and the risks associated with medical treatment. Also, while trying to arrive at a diagnosis, it may be best to look for classical or severe bipolar illness and if the evidence is not strongly suggestive then the diagnosis should be avoided or deferred until conclusive evidence is obtained.

References

1 Chan, D, Sireling, L. ‘I want to be bipolar’ … a new phenomenon. Psychiatrist 2010; 34: 103–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.