Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:38:27.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exploring genomes in agriculture and food science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2007

Phillip Whitfield*
Affiliation:
Proteomics and Functional Genomics Research Group Faculty of Veterinary Science University of Liverpool [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Invited Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2007

The way in which food is produced, processed and delivered to the consumer is the concern of farming and industry worldwide. The desire to produce nutritious food more efficiently has led to the increasing use of advanced molecular technologies in nutritional sciences (van der Werf et al. Reference van der Werf, Schuren, Bijlsma, Tas and van Ommen2001). This area of research can be considered to fall within the emerging science of nutritional genomics. Whilst the focus of nutritional genomics has been human health (Stover, Reference Stover2004), its utility is now beginning to extend beyond the study of human systems to include agriculture and food science.

The significant advances made within the field of nutritional genomics have been underpinned by the advent of genome sequencing projects, which has led to an explosion of available genetic information. Genomics involves the study of genes and their functions in an organism. It aims to understand the structure of the genome, including the mapping of genes and the sequencing of DNA. However, the realisation that the genome sequence fails to explain the fundamental nature of many biological processes has led to the development of post-genomic strategies (transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics) aimed at relating gene expression to phenotypic outcome.

Transcriptomics monitors the expression levels of thousands of genes simultaneously at a specific time and set of conditions and permits the characterisation of mRNA populations. This ability to determine gene expression on a global scale has been facilitated by the development of high-throughput platforms such as DNA microarrays and related technologies. Proteomics complements and extends the study of genomes and transcript data, reflecting the true biochemical outcome of genetic information. Proteomics may be defined as the study of the protein component of a cell, tissue or organism at a given time under given conditions (Wilkins et al. Reference Wilkins, Sanchez, Gooley, Appel, Humphery-Smith, Hochstrasser and Williams1995) and has progressed from the simple identification of proteins to studies that are concerned with protein quantification and proteome dynamics. Proteomic analyses require a combination of efficient and stringent separation technologies and high-resolution MS.

Metabolomics is focused on the analysis of low-molecular-weight metabolites, which are the endproducts of gene expression and are regarded as important indicators, and indeed, integrators, of phenotype (Whitfield et al. Reference Whitfield, German and Noble2004). Metabolomics represents a radical shift from single metabolite monitoring to complex metabolite profiling and pattern recognition. A major goal of modern metabolomic strategies is to measure each individual metabolite within a biological sample. The wide range of low-molecular-weight metabolites in complex biological systems demands a variety of analytical platforms for detection, identification and quantification of molecules with diverse chemical and physical properties. Suitable techniques that are sensitive, robust and have the capacity to acquire data on large populations of metabolites include MS and NMR spectroscopy.

Since nutrition plays a crucial role in the development of human diseases the focus of many nutritional genomic studies to date has been the investigation of the relationship between genes and diet and how these interactions may impact on human health (Ordovas & Mooser, Reference Ordovas and Mooser2004). The manifestation of nutritional deficiencies or disorders such as diabetes, CVD and obesity is known to be influenced by diet. Therefore determining the composition of foods and understanding how food components can modulate health may prove important in the management of these diseases. Nutritional genomic strategies will be useful in providing molecular biomarkers of health and disease and in understanding gene expression changes induced by whole diets or individual dietary constituents (Kussmann et al. Reference Kussmann, Raymond and Affolter2006). This has evolved into the concept of personalised nutrition, which offers the possibility of tailoring dietary recommendations and more effective management of diseases (Watkins et al. Reference Watkins, Hammock, Newman and German2001).

In the present issue of the British Journal of Nutrition, Brown & van der Ouderaa (Reference Brown and van der Ouderaa2007) discuss the applications of nutritional genomics to agriculture and the food industry. The review outlines how investigators are now using nutritional genomics to identify crops with desired genetic characteristics and to enhance the nutritional quality of plants (DellaPenna, Reference DellaPenna1999). These approaches have previously been employed to produce GM crops and to profile their molecular composition (Kuiper et al. Reference Kuiper, Kok and Engel2003; Cellini et al. Reference Cellini, Chesson and Colquhoun2004). The authors also describe the use of these technologies as part of selective breeding programmes of livestock (Georges, Reference Georges1999). The focus of these studies is an understanding of the genetic basis of commercially important traits of farm animals such as reproductive health, disease resistance, growth, fat deposition and milk production. The ability to predict such traits is of immense value to agriculture and food production and there is a clear role for nutritional genomics in developing the knowledge obtained from these studies.

Nutritional genomics has also influenced the monitoring of food composition, authenticity and safety, a key area for the food industry. Nutritional genomic strategies are increasingly being employed to confirm the origin and source of food ingredients (Popping, Reference Popping2002) and feed products (Fernandez Ocana et al. Reference Fernandez Ocana, Neubert, Przyborowska, Parker, Bramley, Halket and Patel2004). These technologies are powerful tools with which to detect food allergens and evaluate changes in plant- and meat-based foods upon processing (Carbonaro, Reference Carbonaro2004). They can also be used to evaluate meat quality (Bendixen, Reference Bendixen2005; Mullen et al. Reference Mullen, Stapleton, Corcoran, Hamill and White2006), and provide a means of identifying markers of food spoilage in fruits, vegetables, meats and dairy products (Brul et al. Reference Brul, Schuren, Montijn, Keijser, van der Spek and Oomes2006).

Genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic strategies are making a significant impact on the landscape of agriculture and food technology. The genome sequences of a number of agriculturally important plant species such as rice and farm animals including the pig, cow and chicken have been obtained or are well advanced. Further, public resources such as ARKdb (Hu et al. Reference Hu, Mungall and Law2001) and AgBase (McCarthy et al. Reference McCarthy, Wang and Magee2006) now exist for the functional analysis of genes and their products in numerous animal and plant species. The genetic manipulation of plants and animals for higher nutritional quality through nutritional genomics may benefit crop and livestock management, leading to more efficient production methods and improvements in diet and health.

Whilst this technology is advancing rapidly, challenges remain and nutritional genomics will be best addressed by integrative studies that include measurements of mRNA, proteins and low-molecular-weight metabolites over time and under varied conditions. Understanding these complex networks will require bioinformatics to obtain additional insights and provide the opportunities for greater exploitation of this information. Whilst this goal may currently be elusive, the umbrella discipline of nutritional genomics has the potential to make a significant impact in the way that we view the availability, production and, ultimately, personalisation of our dietary needs.

References

Bendixen, E (2005) The use of proteomics in meat science. Meat Sci 71, 138149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, L & van der Ouderaa, F (2007) Nutritional genomics: food industry applications from farm to fork. Br J Nutr. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114507691983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brul, S, Schuren, F, Montijn, R, Keijser, BJ, van der Spek, H & Oomes, SJ (2006) The impact of functional genomics on microbiological food quality and safety. Int J Food Microbiol 112, 195199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carbonaro, M (2004) Proteomics: present and future in food quality evaluation. Trends Food Sci Technol 15, 209216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cellini, F, Chesson, A, Colquhoun, I, et al. (2004) Unintended effects and their detection in genetically modified crops. Food Chem Toxicol 42, 10891125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DellaPenna, D (1999) Nutritional genomics: manipulating plant micronutrients to improve human health. Science 285, 375379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez Ocana, M, Neubert, H, Przyborowska, A, Parker, R, Bramley, P, Halket, J & Patel, R (2004) BSE control: detection of gelatine-derived peptides in animal feed by mass spectrometry. Analyst 129, 111115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georges, M (1999) Towards marker assisted selection in livestock. Reprod Nutr Dev 39, 555561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, J, Mungall, C, Law, A, et al. (2001) The ARKdb: genome databases for farmed and other animals. Nucleic Acids Res 29, 106110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuiper, HA, Kok, EJ & Engel, KH (2003) Exploitation of molecular profiling techniques for GM food safety assessement. Curr Opin Biotechnol 14, 238243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kussmann, M, Raymond, F & Affolter, M (2006) OMICS-driven biomarker discovery in nutrition and health. J Biotechnol 124, 758787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, FM, Wang, N, Magee, GB, et al. (2006) AgBase: a functional genomics resource for agriculture. BMC Genomics 7, 229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullen, AM, Stapleton, PC, Corcoran, D, Hamill, RM & White, A (2006) Understanding meat quality through the application of genomic and proteomic approaches. Meat Sci 74, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ordovas, JM & Mooser, V (2004) Nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics. Curr Opin Lipidol 15, 101108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popping, B (2002) The application of biotechnological methods in authenticity testing. J Biotechnol 98, 107112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stover, PJ (2004) Nutritional genomics. Physiol Genomics 16, 161165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Werf, MJ, Schuren, FHJ, Bijlsma, S, Tas, AC & van Ommen, B (2001) Nutrigenomics: application of genomics technologies in nutritional sciences and food technology. J Food Sci 66, 772780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, SM, Hammock, BD, Newman, JW & German, JB (2001) Individual metabolism should guide agriculture towards foods for improved health and nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr 74, 283–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield, PD, German, AJ & Noble, PJ (2004) Metabolomics: an emerging post-genomic tool for nutrition. Br J Nutr 92, 549555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkins, MR, Sanchez, JC, Gooley, AA, Appel, RD, Humphery-Smith, I, Hochstrasser, DF & Williams, KL (1995) Progress with proteome projects: why all proteins expressed by a genome should be identified and how to do it. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 13, 19–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar