Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:14:36.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A broad view of pharmaceutical services in multidisciplinary teams of public Primary Healthcare Centers: a mixed methods study in a large city in Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2022

Samara Jamile Mendes*
Affiliation:
Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Myllena Farisco
Affiliation:
Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Silvana Nair Leite
Affiliation:
Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
Sílvia Storpirtis
Affiliation:
Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Samara Jamile Mendes, Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 580 – Conj. das Químicas – Bloco 13 – Cidade Universitária, Butantã. CEP: 05508-900São Paulo, SP, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aim:

This study aims to describe how the pharmaceutical services are performed in Primary Healthcare Centers of the Brazilian Public Health System in a large city. Background: There is extensive international discussion about the role of pharmacists in health care teams, particularly in Primary Health Care (PHC). However, in Brazil, there is still no consensus on what services the pharmacist should perform in multidisciplinary teams in PHC.

Methods:

This study used mixed methods research, and it was conducted with 200 pharmacists who work in PHC Centers of the public health system in São Paulo. The study was conducted using a focus group and an online survey, and qualitative and quantitative data were obtained.

Findings:

The analysis of the data from the focus group showed two central themes: (i) pharmaceutical services go beyond medicines and (ii) the contributions of the pharmacist to a multidisciplinary team work in PHC. The survey explored 29 services provided by pharmacists, 7 of which were provided daily. It is important to emphasize that pharmacists do not differentiate the relevance attributed to services considered clinical from those that are managerial or more related to access to medicines. This is an opportunity to develop their teamwork skills. Hence, it is necessary to consolidate the professional identity of the pharmacist and to organize their work processes in a multidisciplinary team. PHC is a space that allows a wide development of pharmaceutical services.

Type
Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

There is extensive discussion around the world on the role of pharmacists in health teams, particularly in Primary Health Care (PHC). Some studies describe the pharmacist as the clinician, the manager, and the social caregiver, a key figure in the community where they work (Pottie et al., Reference Pottie, Haydt, Farrell, Kennie, Sellors, Martin and Dolovich2009; Elvey and Hassell, Reference Elvey and Hassell2013; Hesso et al., Reference Hesso, Kayyali and Nabhani-Gebara2019). Others highlight the transition of a more traditional view of the pharmaceutical services to a more patient-related focus, in which the pharmacist works in a multiprofessional team, investing in training which encourages interprofessional collaborations, different forms of communication, and that defines their role in health care (Schindel et al., Reference Schindel, Yuksel, Breault, Daniels, Varnhagen and Hughes2016; Nabhani-Gebara et al., Reference Nabhani-Gebara, Fletcher, Shamim, May, Butt, Chagger, Mason, Patel, Royle and Reeves2020).

Recently, studies point to PHC as a fundamental strategy for the development of the health care system (Walley et al., Reference Walley, Lawn, Tinker, Francisco, Chopra, Rudan, Bhutta and Black2008). For over 20 years in Brazil, this has been the main strategy used by the Unified Health System (SUS), and it is considered the guiding principle of the SUS (Pinto and Giovanella, Reference Pinto and Giovanella2018).

In 2019, 62.6% of the Brazilian population had access to PHC within the Family Health Strategy (FHS) (Giovanella et al., Reference Giovanella, Bousquat, Schenkman, Almeida, Sardinha and Vieira2021). The SUS offers access to health services, including access to medicines, to all the population; the services are integrally financed by public funds (Castro et al., Reference Castro, Massuda, Almeida, Menezes-Filho, Andrade, Noronha, Rocha, Macinko, Hone, Tasca, Giovanella, Malik, Werneck, Fachini and Atun2019). PHC is based on the performance of a multi-professional team, highlighting the importance of the interdisciplinary nature of the team’s work processes. Multidisciplinary work is the study of an object by different disciplines. It is the sum of insights provided by many areas related to PHC, as well as the different methods from each practice. The challenge of interdisciplinarity is to advance the disciplinary barriers that fragment health care (Alves et al., Reference Alves, Brasileiro and Brito2004; Luz, Reference Luz2009).

PHC in Brazil consists of a minimal multidisciplinary team: doctors, nurses, technicians, and a “health agent”, (the community health agent connects the patients/citizen from a determined health district to the professionals of the multidisciplinary team). The other professionals, such as the pharmacist, are part of the teams that support the minimal multidisciplinary teams. Health centers are local establishments distributed in the neighborhoods of all Brazilian cities (Pinto and Giovanella, Reference Pinto and Giovanella2018). Those health centers have an area specifically for the pharmacy, where medicines are dispensed (Leite et al., Reference Leite, Manzini, Alvares, Guerra Junior, Costa, Acurcio, Guibu, Costa, Karnikowski, Soeiro and Farias2017). The Municipal Health Secretariats in the 5,570 districts of Brazil hire pharmacists to work in local public health centers (Faraco et al., Reference Faraco, Rover, Farias and Leite2020). The workforce in PHC is mostly constituted by women and 45.5% of these centers have, at least, one pharmacist (Carvalho et al., Reference Carvalho, Álvares, Costa, Guerra, Acurcio, Costa, Guibu, Soeiro, Karnikowski and Leite2017).

In the city of São Paulo, Brazil, there are 363 pharmacists (Sao Paulo, 2018) allocated to 503 PHC Centers of the Public Health System (National Registry of Health Establishments in Brazil, 2018). A study about the insertion of pharmacists in Primary Healthcare Centers in São Paulo showed an important reduction in the shortage of medicines and an improvement in the quality of medical prescriptions, contributing significantly to improve access to medicines and promote their proper use (Melo and Castro, Reference Melo and Castro2017).

However, in Brazil, there is no consensus on the definition of pharmaceutical services (Costa et al., Reference Costa, Araújo, Penaforte, Barreto, Guerra Junior, Acurcio, Guibu, Alvares, Costa, Karnikowski, Soeiro and Leite2017) making it difficult for other professionals and patients to understand the role of the pharmacist and their contribution to PHC (Nakamura and Leite, Reference Nakamura and Leite2016; Silva et al., Reference Silva, Mendonça, Oliveira and Chemello2018). This study aims to describe the pharmaceutical services performed in Primary Healthcare Centers of the Brazilian Public Health System in a large city. This study used mixed methods research, with data collected from a focus group and an online survey.

Methods

This study used mixed methods research. They are the collection, analysis, and a combination of both quantitative and qualitative techniques in the same research design. The interaction between them offers better analytical possibilities (Creswell and Plano Clark, Reference Creswell and Plano Clark2011). The study was conducted between November 2016 and June 2017, based on data collected from a focus group and an online survey. The focus group results contributed to the creation of the survey. The information from the qualitative stage was used in the quantitative one.

Sample description

All pharmacists who participated in this study work in Primary Healthcare Centers (PHC) of the Public Health System in São Paulo. Pharmacists work in different PHC units, some with outpatient facilities and spontaneous demand and others with the Family Health Strategy, which is the Brazilian PHC model (Castro et al., Reference Castro, Massuda, Almeida, Menezes-Filho, Andrade, Noronha, Rocha, Macinko, Hone, Tasca, Giovanella, Malik, Werneck, Fachini and Atun2019). All study participants were recruited based on an agreement between the University of São Paulo and the Municipal Health Secretariat of São Paulo/SP (MHS-SP). In both stages (a focus group and an online survey), an invitation email was sent to the contact list provided by MHS-SP.

In Brazil, there are 501 pharmacy undergraduate schools distributed among 2,864 higher education institutions (in 2016). The pharmacy schools in Brazil offer a Bachelor’s Degree Program which allows students to perform academic or professional activities in the pharmacy field (Lopes et al., Reference Lopes, Gondim, Soares, Santos, Sales Neto and Pinto2019). Many pharmacists take postgraduate courses in clinical pharmacy or continuing education courses focused on public health (Manzini et al., Reference Manzini, Lorenzoni, Soares, Rech and Leite2021).

Data collection

For the qualitative data collection, a focus group is an instrument based on the participants’ ability to form opinions and attitudes based on the interaction with other individuals (Pope et al., Reference Pope, Zieblnad and Mays2000). For the focus group, there were 20 participants from the Municipal Health Secretariat of São Paulo/SP. The fulfillment of these 20 vacancies on this study was made by randomly choosing names from the MHS-SP pool list. The activity was coordinated by one of the researchers, and there was also an external observer. A script was used with the following topics: 1) the group’s understanding of pharmaceutical service; 2) pharmaceutical services for medicines and people; and 3) the social importance of the services developed by the participants. The discussion was recorded and later transcribed by the research team. The focus group lasted two hours. The focus group participants were also asked to describe, by using cards, the services they develop in their health unit.

The survey was based on the focus group results and on the literature about clinical pharmacy and medicines management (Manzini and Mendes, Reference Manzini, Mendes, Leite, Farias, Mendes, Manzini and Rover2015; Melo and Castro, Reference Melo and Castro2017). The collection of quantitative data happened with the use of the online form (Google® Form), with a list of 29 pharmaceutical services.

For each service, there were four questions: (1) whether the pharmacist is the one who performs the service; (2) how often the service is provided (daily, weekly, fortnightly, monthly or yearly); (3) the degree of importance of services in the context of the work process; and (4) the degree of importance of services based on the pharmacist’s expectations of an ideal work process. For the answers to the last two categories, the Likert scale from 1 to 5 was used (1– unimportant and 5 – very important).

The survey was sent to 162 pharmacists, representing 40% of São Paulo pharmacists, who had voluntarily registered to participate in researches at the University of São Paulo.

Data analysis

The focus group analysis was carried out through themes analysis (Pope et al., Reference Pope, Zieblnad and Mays2000). After extensive reading of the focus group transcripts, it was possible to make some inferences from the meaning of what was said. In the search for key points from the interpretation of the quotations, two main themes emerged. In order to clarify these results, excerpts from the transcripts of the participants’ speeches are presented.

Data from the online form were analyzed using descriptive statistics in Microsoft Excel 2010®. The method was also validated by the COREQ checklist, referring to the focus group and online form (Tong et al., Reference Tong, Sainsbury and Craig2007).

Ethics

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences of USP and the Municipal Health Secretariat of São Paulo/SP. The participants provided written informed consent.

Results and discussion

Results obtained from the focus group

Twenty (20) pharmacists participated in this stage of the study. The average age was 35 years old, 45% of participants graduated between 5 and 10 years ago and 25% less than 5 years ago. Concerning the time working in the SUS, 35% have worked in the SUS for a period between 5 and 10 years and 50% for less than 5 years. Therefore, the sample is heterogeneous, as there is a mixture of new and more experienced pharmacists.

After analyzing the focus group data, two central themes emerged.

Pharmaceutical services go beyond the medicine

  • “Do we pay attention to health promotion? Providing the patient with medication that will cure or treat him is useless if they have no guidance, we are there between the medicines and the patient as we provide them this information.” (SIC)

  • “Both in inventory management and guidance on how to use medications properly, or how to get the medication through the SUS, we promote access, regardless of the procedure stage.” (SIC)

  • “The access to health, medications, and treatment, to name a few, is promoting health. The health promotion she [another participant] just mentioned here, from the orientation, you can control the inventory of this medication so you are able to provide the medication for that patient, and thereby to promote health.” (SIC) From these direct quotations, the pharmacists demonstrate the breadth of their services and the possibilities of reorienting their work towards people’s care, being the professionals responsible for ensuring access to and adequate use of medicines.

In 2006, the WHO already defined pharmaceutical services as a set of actions in the health system that aim to ensure comprehensive and continuous attention to the population’s health needs, both individual and collective, with medicines as one of the elements to be employed (WHO, 2006). In Brazil, the change in focus of the pharmacist’s work processes from medicines-centered to people’s health care has a direct relationship with the development of the SUS.

The participants understood that the pharmacist could reconstruct the notion of health care as restricted to the use of medicines, which is closest to the PHC guidelines:

  • “the interesting part for them is to obtain the medication, the patient is very focused on the medicines and we, as pharmacists, have to take the focus off the medication.” (SIC)

  • “When you question the services, the services should be way beyond just the medicine, in my view, you know? The moment the patient has any complaints, any situation that goes beyond the medication, I think we as health professionals can contribute.” (SIC)

Stimulated by the society that consume them, medicines became a mixture of consumer goods and therapeutic instruments, and these factors were decisive for the pharmacist to take distance from individual care (Angonesi and Sevalho, Reference Angonesi and Sevalho2010; Pereira and Freitas, Reference Pereira and Freitas2008).

Taking advance of this scenario, participants have an expanded understanding of their services, such as guidance to help people, from guidelines on how to access medicines to therapeutic monitoring, or just inventory management, as illustrated in the transcripts:

  • “From promoting access to this orientation to an effective follow up and also the inventory management part, because one thing leads to another.” (SIC)

When asked about their services goals, pharmacists were able to state that their services are performed with a focus on people rather than on medicines and made the following statements:

  • “for people, but patients are very attached to medicine.” “For both.” (SIC)

The resignification of pharmaceutical services in this area can be described by the concept of social constructionism, which investigates the way social phenomena are produced and challenge conventional ideas, demystifying the status quo (current state of affairs) of phenomena as it comprises, they are created through historical processes and social interactions (Giddens and Sutton, Reference Giddens and Sutton2016). Thus, pharmaceutical services built in conjunction with other services provided in PHC challenge the normativity that a pharmacist is not a health professional who is able to take care of people.

The contributions of the pharmacist to a multidisciplinary team work in PHC

  • “We can take care of the patient dealing not only with medication but also with any other problem that may happen, rather than just being there. I think [a pharmacy] has a broader and more strategic view than most health services.” (SIC)

Many activities could be developed by the pharmacist in the multidisciplinary teams in PHC, which is an area of important investment by health systems.

Internationally, there is a discussion related to the advances of the participation of pharmacists in PHC teams (Dolovich et al., Reference Dolovich, Pottie, Kaczorowski, Farrel, Austin, Rodriguez, Gaebel and Sellors2008), as well as the health results for chronic diseases with a better use of medicines, which are possible due to pharmacist interventions (Tan et al., Reference Tan, Stewart, Elliott and George2014).

Some participants pointed out that, despite new possibilities, there are still barriers for services to be performed apart from the focus on the medicines. The PHC model provides other options, such as the encouragement of therapeutic groups, home visits, and working with the team:

  • “So, I try to show them [patients] what alternatives they have that may decrease the amount of medicines taken at that moment, right? Because they don´t usually really know.” (SIC)

  • “Together with the doctor or nurse in the discussion of clinical cases, we are there working with the whole team, in a case discussion, pharmacotherapy, and everything else.” (SIC)The role of the pharmacist in the multidisciplinary team can be influenced by external and internal factors. There is a need for pharmacists with proactive attitudes and who demonstrate how they can act for the patient’s care, as shown below:

  • “Because if we don’t understand it, if we don’t have a positive attitude, and demonstrate that we can contribute to the health care, to the patient, nobody will go to a pharmacy, they just think that the pharmacy is for taking their medicines and leave… many teams also think that.” (SIC)

It is important for the pharmacist to develop skills that are applied in the context of teamwork, such as being responsible or co-responsible for the pharmaceutical service, being able to directly perform a procedure or develop a practice, supervise and monitor the performance by another worker, who is properly trained and qualified, or to perform an action together with another professional or health team (Campese, Reference Campese2017).

Finally, when discussing the importance of their services, they say that although they encounter barriers, they know how important their jobs are because, in PHC, the bonding and trust are legitimized when there are home visits, for example, and they are linked to real-life contexts:

  • “At home visits, you can see the patients’ home, where they store [their medicine]. Also, because it is difficult for the patient to return to the pharmacy [after the home visit], I [pharmacist] go to their place.” (SIC)

Some studies have already demonstrated advances in the pharmacist work in PHC. However, there are still challenges related to the incorporation of new activities into their work processes and the consolidation of their identity in the multidisciplinary team (Silva et al., Reference Silva, Mendonça, Oliveira and Chemello2018).

Between 2008 and 2013, the number of pharmacists registered in PHC Centers in Brazil grew 75.0%. Two factors possibly enabled it: the implementation of the Family Health Support Center and the growth of pharmaceutical education and services in the country (Carvalho et al., Reference Carvalho, Álvares, Costa, Guerra, Acurcio, Costa, Guibu, Soeiro, Karnikowski and Leite2017).

In Brazil, supporting the Family Health teams there is the Family Health Support Center (NASF, in Portuguese), which expands the scope of Primary Health Care. The insertion of pharmacists in this multidisciplinary context represents an opportunity to improve the work process and the access to medicines and their rational use (Nakamura and Leite, Reference Nakamura and Leite2016).

Furthermore, Brazil is one of the few countries that has a public pharmaceutical service model in which pharmacists coordinate all activities related to the medicine chain in government spheres, from selection to use (Carvalho et al., Reference Carvalho, Álvares, Costa, Guerra, Acurcio, Costa, Guibu, Soeiro, Karnikowski and Leite2017).

We have a lot of work to do: Results of the online survey

A total of 134 responses (83% of the sample) were obtained, 18 of which were excluded (3 duplicates, 7 pharmacists who had participated in the focus group, and 8 unidentified). In the end, 116 responses to the form were analyzed.

Of the pharmacists included, 83.5% were female, all older than the age of 25, and 40% graduated more than 10 years ago. It is noteworthy that 46.5% of the pharmacists were hired by the Public Health System in São Paulo from 01 to 05 years ago, and the majority (92.2%) worked between 31 and 40 h weekly. Regarding their experience working at the SUS, 47% were hired between 5 and 10 years ago.

Pharmaceutical services performed in Primary Health Care are shown in Table 1. Between 70% and 90% of the pharmacists indicate that they perform 12 services in PHC. Eleven types of services are performed by 60% to 30% of pharmacists and only 3 services are performed by less than 5% of them.

Table 1. Pharmaceutical services done in PHC of São Paulo, Brazil, based on the perception of the study participants

Brazilian pharmacists have developed an expertise to check the availability of medicines in the SUS: the access routes, inventory management to meet local needs, meetings with the health team to discuss the availability of medicines, and what is prescribed. All services are still under development.

Other studies show similar situations. There is a large number of pharmacists in community pharmacies, and their workforce has increased in recent years. However, the services they develop still need to be better used (Campbell et al., Reference Campbell, Braund and Morris2017). In Canada, for example, pharmacists perform more than 20 PHC services. All the pharmacists reported, in an exploratory study, that they are engaged in direct patient care, including therapeutic issues, drug overhauls, and post-hospitalization drug reconciliation (Gillespie et al., Reference Gillespie, Dolovich and Dahrouge2017).

Another aspect considered for each pharmaceutical service was the frequency of performance. Table 2 shows the frequency of services that 90% of pharmacists claim to perform.

Table 2. Pharmaceutical services in PHC of São Paulo, Brazil, reported as the most frequent ones

Of all services performed daily, only one has direct interaction with the multidisciplinary team: informing other health care teams about medicine. The other services (Table 2) of the pharmacist’s work routine are specific to the pharmacy.

The work with the pharmacy team (which consists of pharmacy technicians) stands out. In Brazil, the technicians are a fundamental part of the health workforce. The pharmacy workforce in dispensing service at a PHC is made up of 43% of technicians and 33.3% of pharmacists (Carvalho et al., Reference Carvalho, Álvares, Costa, Guerra, Acurcio, Costa, Guibu, Soeiro, Karnikowski and Leite2017).

For each service, the pharmacists indicated that the degree of importance and the average answers (1 – unimportant and 5 – very important) are presented in Table 3. It is possible to observe that pharmacists understand their services as important, not differentiating the types of services as more or less important. This is essential, as pharmacists value their work in PHC and recognize themselves as a crucial part of this process.

Table 3. Degree of importance of the pharmaceutical services in the current context and ideal work process in the PHC, according to the pharmacists’ perception

The pharmaceutical services models in Brazil, not contextualized using the PHC principles, have proved to be fragmented, with divisions of service groups considered clinical x managerial ones, and the ones called middle activities for care and clinical services (Correr et al., Reference Correr, Otuki and Soler2011; Pereira et al., Reference Pereira, Luiza and Cruz2015). In 2000, Storpirtis et al. stated that pharmacists should act in an integrated manner, which would certainly benefit the population and could reduce health spending (Storpirtis et al., Reference Storpirtis, Ribeiro, Marcolongo, Gomes and Reis2000).

The right of access to medicines is ensured by ubiquitous public healthcare centers (Castro et al., Reference Castro, Massuda, Almeida, Menezes-Filho, Andrade, Noronha, Rocha, Macinko, Hone, Tasca, Giovanella, Malik, Werneck, Fachini and Atun2019). Pharmacists are playing an increasing role in PHC centers, fulfilling a growing range of roles and responsibilities, especially for improving access to medicines and their appropriate use (Faraco et al., Reference Faraco, Rover, Farias and Leite2020).

PHC has guidelines that provide opportunities for the pharmacist to act in health care such as assistance during the first contact with the SUS, care coordination, longitudinal care plans, mechanisms to ensure accessibility, as well as patient embracement (Portela, Reference Portela2017).

The study’s limitations were the difficulty of contacting pharmacists at the Centers of the Unified Health System in São Paulo. Professionals find it difficult to participate in research and activities that force them to leave the center, as there are many responsibilities and patients to take care of. More than one focus group could have been created, as there were enough participants. However, at that time, the decision was to keep a larger number of participants in the group, as evasion was expected, which did not happen.

Conclusion

This study seeks to answer the question of what role a pharmacist has in PHC. According to the perception of PHC pharmacists, it was possible to identify two central themes, which are pharmaceutical services go beyond the medicine and the contributions of the pharmacist to a multidisciplinary teamwork in PHC.

It was also possible to catalogue 29 services provided by pharmacists. The list of services shown has not been divided into service groups. This is because there is an understanding that services are not fragmented. It is important to emphasize that pharmacists do not differentiate the relevance attributed to services considered clinical from those that are managerial or more related to access to medicines. This is an opportunity for them to develop their teamwork skills. Hence, it is necessary to consolidate the pharmacist’s professional identity and organize their work processes in a multidisciplinary team. PHC is a space that allows a wide development of pharmaceutical services.

More research is needed in the area, such as the investigation of the relationship between pharmacist training in Brazil and the development of skills and competences to work in health care and in PHC. In addition, studies that use qualitative methods can help further deepen the role of the pharmacist in PHC’s multidisciplinary teams.

Acknowledgements

To the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development - CNPq for the scholarship granted in the doctorate of some of the authors.

Financial support

One of the researchers has received a research grant from the National Council of Science and Technology – CNPq.

Conflicts of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest regarding the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Alves, R, Brasileiro, MCS and Brito, SO (2004) Interdisciplinaridade: um conceito em construção. Episteme 19, 139148.Google Scholar
Angonesi, D and Sevalho, G (2010) Atenção Farmacêutica: fundamentação conceitual e crítica para um modelo brasileiro. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 15, 36033614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, C, Braund, R and Morris, C (2017) Beyond the four walls: an exploratory survey of location, employment and roles of pharmacists in primary health care. J Prim Health Care 9, 297310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campese, M (2017) Desafios para os Serviços Farmacêuticos na perspectiva das necessidades e cuidados em saúde. Tese (Doutorado em Farmácia) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis. https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/188470. Accessed 10 September 2019.Google Scholar
Carvalho, MN, Álvares, J, Costa, KS, Guerra, AA Junior, Acurcio, FA, Costa, EA, Guibu, IA, Soeiro, OM, Karnikowski, MGO and Leite, SN (2017) Workforce in the pharmaceutical services of the primary health care of SUS, Brazil. Revista de Saúde Pública 51, 23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castro, MC, Massuda, A, Almeida, G, Menezes-Filho, NA, Andrade, MV, Noronha, KVMS, Rocha, R, Macinko, J, Hone, T, Tasca, R, Giovanella, L, Malik, AM, Werneck, H, Fachini, LA and Atun, R (2019) Brazil’s unified health system: the first 30 years and prospects for the future. The Lancet 394, 345356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correr, CJ, Otuki, MF and Soler, O (2011) Assistência farmacêutica integrada ao processo de cuidado em saúde: gestão clínica do medicamento. Rev Pan-Amaz Saúde 2, 4149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, EA, Araújo, OS, Penaforte, TR, Barreto, JL, Guerra Junior, AA, Acurcio, FA, Guibu, IA, Alvares, J, Costa, KS, Karnikowski, MGO, Soeiro, OM and Leite, SN (2017) Concepções de assistência farmacêutica na atenção primária à saúde, Brasil. Rev Saude Publica 51, 26.Google Scholar
Creswell, JW and Plano Clark, VL (2011) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Dolovich, L, Pottie, K, Kaczorowski, J, Farrel, B, Austin, Z, Rodriguez, C, Gaebel, K and Sellors, C (2008) Integrating family medicine and pharmacy to advance primary care therapeutics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 83, 913917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elvey, R and Hassell, K (2013) Who do you think you are? Pharmacists’ perceptions of their professional identity. Int J Pharm Pract 21, 322332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faraco, EB, Rover, MM, Farias, MR and Leite, SN (2020) Desenvolvimento de um protocolo de indicadores para avaliação nacional da capacidade de gestão da Assistência Farmacêutica na Atenção Primária à Saúde. Revista de Administração em Saúde 20, e204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A and Sutton, PW (2016) Conceitos Essenciais da Sociologia, 1938. 1 ed. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.Google Scholar
Gillespie, U, Dolovich, L and Dahrouge, S (2017) Activities performed by pharmacists integrated in family health teams: results from a web-based survey. Can Pharm J 150, 407416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giovanella, L, Bousquat, EM, Schenkman, S, Almeida, PF, Sardinha, LMV and Vieira, MLFP (2021) Cobertura da Estratégia Saúde da Família no Brasil: o que nos mostram as Pesquisas Nacionais de Saúde 2013 e 2019. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 26, 25432556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesso, I, Kayyali, R and Nabhani-Gebara, S (2019) Supporting respiratory patients in primary care: a qualitative insight from independent community pharmacists in London. BMC Health Serv Res 5, 15.Google Scholar
Leite, SN, Manzini, F, Alvares, J, Guerra Junior, AA, Costa, EA, Acurcio, FA, Guibu, IA, Costa, KS, Karnikowski, MGO, Soeiro, OM and Farias, MR (2017) Infrastructure of pharmacies of the primary health care in the Brazilian Unified Health System: analysis of PNAUM - Services data. Revista de Saúde Pública 51, 1s11s.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopes, NMS, Gondim, APS, Soares, ACS, Santos, DB, Sales Neto, MR and Pinto, DM (2019) A quantitative analysis of the quality of pharmacy education in Brazil. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 83, 6543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luz, M (2009) Complexidade do campo da saúde coletiva: multidisciplinaridade, interdisciplinaridade e transdisciplinaridade de saberes e práticas – análise sócio-histórica de uma trajetória paradigmática. Saúde e Sociedade 18, 304311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, F, Lorenzoni, AA, Soares, L, Rech, N and Leite, SN (2021) Impact of a management course for pharmacists on their behaviors and the health systems capacity. American Journal Of Pharmaceutical Education 1, 8506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, F and Mendes, SJ (2015) Matriz de indicadores do modelo de avaliação e as premissas da capacidade de gestão da assistência farmacêutica em âmbito municipal. In Leite, SN, Farias, MR, Mendes, SJ, Manzini, F and Rover, MRM, editors, Gestão da assistência farmacêutica: proposta para avaliação no contexto municipal. A experiência em Santa Catarina. 1ed. Florianópolis, SC: Editora da UFSC, 3958.Google Scholar
Melo, DO and Castro, LLC (2017). Pharmacist’s contribution to the promotion of access and rational use of essential medicines in SUS. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 22, 235244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nabhani-Gebara, S, Fletcher, S, Shamim, A, May, L, Butt, N, Chagger, S, Mason, T, Patel, K, Royle, F and Reeves, S (2020) General practice pharmacists in England: integration, mediation and professional dynamics. Res Social Adm Pharm 16, 1724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakamura, CA and Leite, SN (2016) Construction of the work process of the Family Health Support Nucleus: the experience of pharmacists in a city in the south of Brazil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 21, 15651672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Registry of Health Establishments in Brazil. Ministry of Health in Brazil (2018) http://cnes.datasus.gov.br/. Accessed 22 September 2018.Google Scholar
Pereira, LRL and Freitas, O (2008) A evolução da Atenção Farmacêutica e a perspectiva para o Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Farmacêuticas 44, 601612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, NC, Luiza, VL and Cruz, MM (2015) Pharmaceutical services at primary care in the municipality of Rio de Janeiro: an evaluability assessment. Saúde Debate 39, 451468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, LF and Giovanella, L (2018) The Family Health Strategy: expanding access and reducing hospitalizations due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC). Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 23, 19031913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, C, Zieblnad, S and Mays, N (2000) Qualitative research in healthcare: analyzing qualitative data. BMJ 320, 114116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portela, GZ (2017) Primary Health Care: an essay on concepts applied to national studies Physis Revista de Saúde Coletiva 27, 255276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pottie, K, Haydt, S, Farrell, B, Kennie, N, Sellors, C, Martin, C and Dolovich, L (2009) Pharmacist’s identity development within multidisciplinary primary health care teams in Ontario; qualitative results from the IMPACT project. Res Social Adm Pharm 5, 319326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schindel, TJ, Yuksel, N, Breault, R, Daniels, J, Varnhagen, S and Hughes, CA (2016) Perceptions of pharmacists’ roles in the era of expanding scopes of practice. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 13, 148161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Secretaria da Saúde do Município de São Paulo. Sistema de Gestão de Pessoas. (São Paulo) (2018) http://tabnet.saude.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/cgi/deftohtm3.exe?secretarias/saude/TABNET/sisrh/sisrh2.def. Accessed 22 September 2018.Google Scholar
Silva, DAM, Mendonça, SAM, Oliveira, DR and Chemello, C (2018) A prática clínica do farmacêutico no núcleo de apoio à saúde a família. Trabalho, Educação e Saúde 16, 659682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storpirtis, S, Ribeiro, E and Marcolongo, R (2000) Novas Diretrizes para Assistência Farmacêutica Hospitalar: Atenção Farmacêutica/Farmácia Clínica. In Gomes, MJVM and Reis, AMM, editors, Ciências Farmacêuticas. Uma abordagem em Farmácia Hospitalar. 1ª ed. São Paulo, SP: Editora Atheneu; 2000.Google Scholar
Tan, EC, Stewart, K, Elliott, RA and George, J (2014) Pharmacist services provided in general practice clinics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Res Soc Adm Pharm 10, 608622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tong, A, Sainsbury, P and Craig, J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19, 349357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walley, J, Lawn, JE, Tinker, A, Francisco, A, Chopra, M, Rudan, M, Bhutta, ZA, Black, RE and the Lancet Alma-Ata Working Group (2008) Primary health care: making Alma-Ata a reality. The Lancet 372, 10011007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Who. World Health Organization. International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) (2006) Developing pharmacy practice: a focus on patient care. Handbook, 2006 edition. Netherlands: WHO/International Pharmaceutical Federation, 2006. 87 p. Disponível em: <https://www.fip.org/files/fip/publications/DevelopingPharmacyPractice/DevelopingPharmacyPracticeEN.pdf>. Accessed 10 November 2018..+Accessed+10+November+2018.>Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Pharmaceutical services done in PHC of São Paulo, Brazil, based on the perception of the study participants

Figure 1

Table 2. Pharmaceutical services in PHC of São Paulo, Brazil, reported as the most frequent ones

Figure 2

Table 3. Degree of importance of the pharmaceutical services in the current context and ideal work process in the PHC, according to the pharmacists’ perception