Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:28:46.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determinants of campylobacteriosis notifications in New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2012

M. PYRA
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
C. CONOVER
Affiliation:
Illinois Department of Public Health, Springfield, IL, USA
J. HOWLAND
Affiliation:
Illinois Department of Public Health, Springfield, IL, USA
K. SOYEMI
Affiliation:
Illinois Department of Public Health, Springfield, IL, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

To the Editor:

In the November 2011 issue of Epidemiology and Infection, Spencer et al. reported on factors associated with campylobacteriosis in New Zealand [Reference Spencer1]. We conducted a similar analysis in the state of Illinois from 2004 to 2007. During this period, the average Campylobacter rates for Illinois and the USA were 10·7 and 12·7 cases/100 000, respectively [2]. Several studies have reported an increase in cases in young adults [2Reference Miller6], which we also observed in Illinois (9·6 cases/100 000 in the 20–29 years age group; Fig. 1). We also observed a higher rate of cases in the 50–59 years age group (14·9 cases/100 000).

Fig. 1. Average reported Campylobacter case rate in Illinois by age, 2004–2007.

To further evaluate age groups with increased rates of infection, all cases reported in the 20–29 years (n=596) and 50–59 years (n=712) age groups were geocoded to the census tract level. Demographic data for each census tract were obtained from the 2000 United States Census. In the adjusted Poisson regression models, census tracts with factors related to higher socioeconomic status (smaller family size, higher median income, higher rates of college degrees, higher percent of white population) and higher percent of population living with relatives were significantly more likely to report cases of Campylobacter in both age groups (Table 1); increased rate of home ownership, another indicator of higher socioeconomic status, was also associated with greater risk in the 20–29 years age group (Table 2).

Table 1. Census tract factors associated with reported cases of Campylobacter in the 20–29 years age group

IRR, Incidence rate ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table 2. Census tract factors associated with reported cases of Campylobacter in the 50–59 years age group

IRR, Incidence rate ratio; CI, confidence interval.

We did not find a difference between urban and rural populations, as Spencer did; however, they found a rural/urban difference in teenagers, who were not included in this analysis. Cattle farming is uncommon in Illinois and therefore was not examined. Seasonal and sex patterns were similar to those reported by Spencer. As Spencer suggested, this association between Campylobacter and higher socioeconomic status may reflect better access to healthcare, since many cases go undiagnosed, or different eating patterns. We looked briefly at food deserts (areas where access to fresh foods are very limited so that residents rely on processed or fast foods) as a factor but found no association.

In summary, in both the 20–29 and 50–59 years age groups, several census tract factors related to higher socioeconomic status and living with relatives were associated with higher reported rates of campylobacteriosis in Illinois.

Declaration of Interest

None.

References

Spencer, SEF, et al. The spatial and temporal determinants of campylobacteriosis notifications in New Zealand, 2001–2007. Epidemiology and Infection 2011; 138: 115.Google Scholar
FoodNet Reports CDC FoodNet. (http://www.cdc.gov/foodnet/reports.htm). Accessed July 2011.Google Scholar
Baker, MG, Sneyd, E, Wilson, NA. Is the major increase in notified campylobacteriosis in New Zealand real? Epidemiology and Infection 2007; 135: 163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, RS, Olmsted, RN. Campylobacter jejuni infection in Colorado: unexplained excess of cases in males. Public Health Reports 1985; 100: 333336.Google ScholarPubMed
Manaseki, S. Ethnic inequalities in Campylobacter infection in Birmingham, UK: descriptive study of notified cases. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 2004; 58: 278279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G, et al. Does age acquired immunity confer selective protection to common serotypes of Campylobacter jejuni? BMC Infectious Diseases 2005; 5: 66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Average reported Campylobacter case rate in Illinois by age, 2004–2007.

Figure 1

Table 1. Census tract factors associated with reported cases of Campylobacter in the 20–29 years age group

Figure 2

Table 2. Census tract factors associated with reported cases of Campylobacter in the 50–59 years age group