Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-25T08:09:20.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Table of Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2023

Neil Craik
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo, Ontario
Tara Davenport
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Ruth Mackenzie
Affiliation:
University of Westminster
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

Permanent Court of International Justice

  • Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland) (Merits) [1928] PCIJ Rep Series A No 17

  • SS Wimbledon (United Kingdom, France, Italy & Japan v Germany) [1923] PCIJ Rep Series A No 1

International Court of Justice

  • Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v Democratic Republic of the Congo) (Compensation), Judgment [2012] ICJ Rep 324

  • Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v Russia), Application Instituting Proceedings, 26 February 2022

  • Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide (The Gambia v Myanmar), General List No 178, Preliminary Objections, Judgment of 22 July 2022

  • Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v Uganda), Judgment [2005] ICJ Rep 168

  • Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v Rwanda), Jurisdiction and Admissibility [2006] ICJ Rep 6

  • Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v Uganda), (Order of 8 September 2020) [2020] ICJ Rep 264; (Order of 12 October 2020) [2020] ICJ Rep 295

  • Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v Uganda), General List No 116, Judgment, 9 February 2022

  • Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v Spain), Second Phase [1970] ICJ Rep 3

  • Case Concerning Aerial Herbicide Spraying (Ecuador v Colombia) (Application Instituting Proceedings), General List No 138 [2008] ICJ Rep 4

  • Case Concerning the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment [2007] ICJ Rep 43

  • Case Concerning East Timor (Portugal v Australia) [1995] ICJ Rep 90

  • Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v Nicaragua) and Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v Costa Rica), Judgment [2015] ICJ Rep 665

  • Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v Nicaragua), Compensation Owed by the Republic of Nicaragua to the Republic of Costa Rica, Judgment [2018] ICJ Rep 15

  • Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v Australia), Preliminary Objections [1992] ICJ Rep 240

  • Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v Costa Rica), Judgment [2015] ICJ Rep 665

  • Corfu Channel Case (United Kingdom v Albania), Judgment [1949] ICJ Rep 4

  • Eletronica Sicula, S.p.A (ELSI) (United States of America v Italy), Judgment [1989] ICJ Rep 15

  • Gabčikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v Slovakia), Judgment [1997] ICJ Rep 7

  • Interpretation of the Agreement of 25 March 1951 between the WHO and Egypt, Advisory Opinion [1980] ICJ Rep 73

  • Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion [2004] ICJ Rep 136

  • Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965, Advisory Opinion [2019] ICJ Rep 95

  • Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion [1996] ICJ 226

  • Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v the United States of America), Judgment [1986] ICJ Rep 14

  • Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943 (Italy v France, United Kingdom and United States), Judgment [1954] ICJ Rep 19

  • Nuclear Tests Case (Australia v France), Judgment [1974] ICJ Rep 253

  • Nuclear Tests Case (New Zealand v France), Judgment [1974] ICJ Rep 457

  • Obligations Concerning Negotiations Relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v United Kingdom), Preliminary Objections, Judgment [2016] ICJ Rep 833

  • Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v Uruguay), Judgment [2010] ICJ Rep 14

  • Questions Relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v Senegal), Judgment [2012] ICJ Rep 422

  • Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion [1949] ICJ Rep 174

  • Southwest Africa Case (Ethiopia v South Africa; Liberia v South Africa) Second Phase, Judgment [1966] ICJ Rep 6

  • Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v Japan: New Zealand Intervening), Judgment [2014] ICJ Rep 226

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) and UNCLOS-Related Arbitral Tribunals

  • Arctic Sunrise Arbitration (Netherlands v Russia), Provisional Measures, ITLOS Case No 22 [2013]

  • Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundaries between Mauritius and Maldives (Mauritius v Maldives), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, ITLOS Case No 28 [2021]

  • The M/V ‘NORSTAR’ Case (Panama v Italy), Judgment, ITLOS Case No 25 [2019]

  • Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC), Advisory Opinion of 2 April 2015, ITLOS Case No 21 [2015]

  • Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area, Advisory Opinion of 1 February 2011, ITLOS Case No 17 [2011]

  • South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v The People’s Republic of China), Award, Oxford Reports on ICGJ 495 [PCA 2016]

Other Inter-state Arbitrations

  • Bering Fur Seals Arbitration, Award RIAA vol XXVIII, 263 [1893]

  • Iron Rhine Arbitration (Belgium v Netherlands) Award RIAA vol XXVII 23 [2005]

  • Lake Lanoux Case (France v Spain) RIAA vol XII 281 [1957]

  • Trail Smelter Arbitration (Canada v United States) RIAA vol III 1905 [1941]

United Nations Compensation Commission

  • UNCC ‘Report and Recommendations on the First Instalment of “F4” Claims’ (2001) UN Doc S/AC 26/2001/16

  • UNCC ‘Report and Recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning the Second Instalment of “F4” Claims’ (2002) UN Doc S/AC 26/2002/26

  • UNCC ‘Report and Recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning the Third Instalment of “F4” Claims’ (2003) UN Doc S/AC 26/2003/3

  • UNCC ‘Report and Recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning the Fifth Instalment of “F4” Claims’ (2005) UN Doc S/AC 26/2005/10

Inter-American Court of Human Rights

  • The Environment and Human Rights, Advisory Opinion OC-23/17, Inter-American Court of Human Rights Series A No 23 (15 November 2017)

Investment Disputes

  • Perenco Ecuador Limited and The Republic of Ecuador, ICSID Case ARB/08/6 Award of 27 September 2019

Domestic Case Law

  • AG v PYA Quarries Ltd [1957] 2 QB 169 (UK)

  • Alfred L Snapp & Son, Inc v Puerto Rico ex rel Barez, 458 US 592 (1982)

  • Anns v Merton London Borough Council [1977] UKHL 4, [1978] AC 728

  • AWA Ltd v Daniels t/as Deloitte, Haskins and Sells (1992) 7 ACSR 759

  • British Columbia v Canadian Forest Products Ltd 2004 SCC 38

  • British South Africa Co v Companhia de Moçambique [1893] AC 602 (HL)

  • Bonnington Castings v Wardlow [1956] AC 613

  • Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Countries Leather plc [1994] 1 All ER 53

  • Dow Chemical Co v Aifares 286 SW2d 674, 688–689 (Tex 1990)

  • Environmental Defense Fund v Massey (1992) 986 F 2d 528 (US)

  • Friends of the Earth Netherlands (Milieudefensie) v Royal Dutch Shell, District Court The Hague (Judgment of 26 May 2021) Case No C/09/571932

  • Hilton v Guyot (1895) 159 US 113

  • Juliana v United States 217 F.Supp.3d 1224 (D. Or. 2016)

  • Juliana v United States 447 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2020)

  • Just v British Columbia [1989] 2 SCR 1228

  • La Generale des Carrieres et des Mines v FG Hemisphere Associates LLC, [2012] UK PC 27, para 29

  • McGhee v National Coal Board [1972] 3 All ER 1008

  • National Audubon Society v Superior Court of Alpine County 33 Cal (3d) 419 (1983) [Mono Lake]

  • Pakootas v Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd (2006) 452 F.3d 1066 (9th Cir) (US)

  • Pfizer, Inc v Government of India 434 US 308

  • Principality of Monaco v Mississippi (1934) 292 US 313 (US), 323

  • RJR Nabisco Inc v European Community (2016) 136 S Ct 2101 (US)

  • Rylands v Fletcher (1868) LR 3 HL 330

  • The Schooner Exchange v McFadden (1812) 7 Cranch 116

  • Selma Pressure Treating Co v Osmose Wood Preserving Inc, 271 Cal. Rptr 596, 606 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)

  • Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd [1986] UKHL 10, [1987] AC 460

  • State v Jersey Central Power & Light Co 336 1A.2d 750, 759 (N.J. App. Div. 1975)

  • The State of the Netherlands v Urgenda Foundation, The Supreme Court of the Netherlands (20 December 2019), case 19/00135

  • The State of the Netherlands v Urgenda Foundation, The Hague Court of Appeal (9 October 2018), case 200.178.245/01

  • Water Use Permit Applications, Re, 9 P (3d), 409, 450 (2002)’

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Table of Cases
  • Neil Craik, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Tara Davenport, National University of Singapore, Ruth Mackenzie, University of Westminster
  • Book: Liability for Environmental Harm to the Global Commons
  • Online publication: 24 August 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108866477.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Table of Cases
  • Neil Craik, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Tara Davenport, National University of Singapore, Ruth Mackenzie, University of Westminster
  • Book: Liability for Environmental Harm to the Global Commons
  • Online publication: 24 August 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108866477.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Table of Cases
  • Neil Craik, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Tara Davenport, National University of Singapore, Ruth Mackenzie, University of Westminster
  • Book: Liability for Environmental Harm to the Global Commons
  • Online publication: 24 August 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108866477.001
Available formats
×