Permanent Court of International Justice
Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland) (Merits) [1928] PCIJ Rep Series A No 17
SS Wimbledon (United Kingdom, France, Italy & Japan v Germany) [1923] PCIJ Rep Series A No 1
International Court of Justice
Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v Democratic Republic of the Congo) (Compensation), Judgment [2012] ICJ Rep 324
Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v Russia), Application Instituting Proceedings, 26 February 2022
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide (The Gambia v Myanmar), General List No 178, Preliminary Objections, Judgment of 22 July 2022
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v Uganda), Judgment [2005] ICJ Rep 168
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v Rwanda), Jurisdiction and Admissibility [2006] ICJ Rep 6
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v Uganda), (Order of 8 September 2020) [2020] ICJ Rep 264; (Order of 12 October 2020) [2020] ICJ Rep 295
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v Uganda), General List No 116, Judgment, 9 February 2022
Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v Spain), Second Phase [1970] ICJ Rep 3
Case Concerning Aerial Herbicide Spraying (Ecuador v Colombia) (Application Instituting Proceedings), General List No 138 [2008] ICJ Rep 4
Case Concerning the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment [2007] ICJ Rep 43
Case Concerning East Timor (Portugal v Australia) [1995] ICJ Rep 90
Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v Nicaragua) and Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v Costa Rica), Judgment [2015] ICJ Rep 665
Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v Nicaragua), Compensation Owed by the Republic of Nicaragua to the Republic of Costa Rica, Judgment [2018] ICJ Rep 15
Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v Australia), Preliminary Objections [1992] ICJ Rep 240
Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v Costa Rica), Judgment [2015] ICJ Rep 665
Corfu Channel Case (United Kingdom v Albania), Judgment [1949] ICJ Rep 4
Eletronica Sicula, S.p.A (ELSI) (United States of America v Italy), Judgment [1989] ICJ Rep 15
Gabčikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v Slovakia), Judgment [1997] ICJ Rep 7
Interpretation of the Agreement of 25 March 1951 between the WHO and Egypt, Advisory Opinion [1980] ICJ Rep 73
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion [2004] ICJ Rep 136
Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965, Advisory Opinion [2019] ICJ Rep 95
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion [1996] ICJ 226
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v the United States of America), Judgment [1986] ICJ Rep 14
Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943 (Italy v France, United Kingdom and United States), Judgment [1954] ICJ Rep 19
Nuclear Tests Case (Australia v France), Judgment [1974] ICJ Rep 253
Nuclear Tests Case (New Zealand v France), Judgment [1974] ICJ Rep 457
Obligations Concerning Negotiations Relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v United Kingdom), Preliminary Objections, Judgment [2016] ICJ Rep 833
Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v Uruguay), Judgment [2010] ICJ Rep 14
Questions Relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v Senegal), Judgment [2012] ICJ Rep 422
Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion [1949] ICJ Rep 174
Southwest Africa Case (Ethiopia v South Africa; Liberia v South Africa) Second Phase, Judgment [1966] ICJ Rep 6
Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v Japan: New Zealand Intervening), Judgment [2014] ICJ Rep 226
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) and UNCLOS-Related Arbitral Tribunals
Arctic Sunrise Arbitration (Netherlands v Russia), Provisional Measures, ITLOS Case No 22 [2013]
Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundaries between Mauritius and Maldives (Mauritius v Maldives), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, ITLOS Case No 28 [2021]
The M/V ‘NORSTAR’ Case (Panama v Italy), Judgment, ITLOS Case No 25 [2019]
Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC), Advisory Opinion of 2 April 2015, ITLOS Case No 21 [2015]
Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area, Advisory Opinion of 1 February 2011, ITLOS Case No 17 [2011]
South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v The People’s Republic of China), Award, Oxford Reports on ICGJ 495 [PCA 2016]
Other Inter-state Arbitrations
Bering Fur Seals Arbitration, Award RIAA vol XXVIII, 263 [1893]
Iron Rhine Arbitration (Belgium v Netherlands) Award RIAA vol XXVII 23 [2005]
Lake Lanoux Case (France v Spain) RIAA vol XII 281 [1957]
Trail Smelter Arbitration (Canada v United States) RIAA vol III 1905 [1941]
United Nations Compensation Commission
UNCC ‘Report and Recommendations on the First Instalment of “F4” Claims’ (2001) UN Doc S/AC 26/2001/16
UNCC ‘Report and Recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning the Second Instalment of “F4” Claims’ (2002) UN Doc S/AC 26/2002/26
UNCC ‘Report and Recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning the Third Instalment of “F4” Claims’ (2003) UN Doc S/AC 26/2003/3
UNCC ‘Report and Recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning the Fifth Instalment of “F4” Claims’ (2005) UN Doc S/AC 26/2005/10
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
The Environment and Human Rights, Advisory Opinion OC-23/17, Inter-American Court of Human Rights Series A No 23 (15 November 2017)
Investment Disputes
Perenco Ecuador Limited and The Republic of Ecuador, ICSID Case ARB/08/6 Award of 27 September 2019
Domestic Case Law
AG v PYA Quarries Ltd [1957] 2 QB 169 (UK)
Alfred L Snapp & Son, Inc v Puerto Rico ex rel Barez, 458 US 592 (1982)
Anns v Merton London Borough Council [1977] UKHL 4, [1978] AC 728
AWA Ltd v Daniels t/as Deloitte, Haskins and Sells (1992) 7 ACSR 759
British Columbia v Canadian Forest Products Ltd 2004 SCC 38
British South Africa Co v Companhia de Moçambique [1893] AC 602 (HL)
Bonnington Castings v Wardlow [1956] AC 613
Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Countries Leather plc [1994] 1 All ER 53
Dow Chemical Co v Aifares 286 SW2d 674, 688–689 (Tex 1990)
Environmental Defense Fund v Massey (1992) 986 F 2d 528 (US)
Friends of the Earth Netherlands (Milieudefensie) v Royal Dutch Shell, District Court The Hague (Judgment of 26 May 2021) Case No C/09/571932
Hilton v Guyot (1895) 159 US 113
Juliana v United States 217 F.Supp.3d 1224 (D. Or. 2016)
Juliana v United States 447 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2020)
Just v British Columbia [1989] 2 SCR 1228
La Generale des Carrieres et des Mines v FG Hemisphere Associates LLC, [2012] UK PC 27, para 29
McGhee v National Coal Board [1972] 3 All ER 1008
National Audubon Society v Superior Court of Alpine County 33 Cal (3d) 419 (1983) [Mono Lake]
Pakootas v Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd (2006) 452 F.3d 1066 (9th Cir) (US)
Pfizer, Inc v Government of India 434 US 308
Principality of Monaco v Mississippi (1934) 292 US 313 (US), 323
RJR Nabisco Inc v European Community (2016) 136 S Ct 2101 (US)
Rylands v Fletcher (1868) LR 3 HL 330
The Schooner Exchange v McFadden (1812) 7 Cranch 116
Selma Pressure Treating Co v Osmose Wood Preserving Inc, 271 Cal. Rptr 596, 606 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)
Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd [1986] UKHL 10, [1987] AC 460
State v Jersey Central Power & Light Co 336 1A.2d 750, 759 (N.J. App. Div. 1975)
The State of the Netherlands v Urgenda Foundation, The Supreme Court of the Netherlands (20 December 2019), case 19/00135
The State of the Netherlands v Urgenda Foundation, The Hague Court of Appeal (9 October 2018), case 200.178.245/01
‘Water Use Permit Applications, Re, 9 P (3d), 409, 450 (2002)’