Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:16:44.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Arbitral Award of Oct. 3, 1899 (Guy. v. Venez.) (Decision on Jurisdiction) (I.C.J.)—Corrigendum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Brendan Plant
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Corrigendum
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , June 2022 , pp. 498
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The American Society of International Law

In the original published article by Plant,Reference Plant1 endnote 16 was incorrect.Reference Gómez and Mogollón2 This has since been corrected online.

References

REFERENCES

Plant, Brendan, “Introductory Note to Arbitral Award of Oct. 3, 1899 (Guy. v. Venez.) (Decision on Jurisdiction) (I.C.J.),” ILM 60 (2021), 1112-1162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2021.50.Google Scholar
Gómez, Simón and Mogollón, Moisés A. Montiel, A Commentary on the Arbitral Award of 3 October 1899 (Guyana v. Venezuela) jurisdiction ruling: The road to hell is paved with good intentions, Opinio Juris (Feb. 19, 2021), http://opiniojuris.org/2021/02/19/a-commentary-on-the-arbitral-award-of-3-october-1899-guyana-v-venezuela-jurisdiction-ruling-the-road-to-hell-is-paved-with-good-intentions/.Google Scholar