In the original published article by Plant,Reference Plant1 endnote 16 was incorrect.Reference Gómez and Mogollón2 This has since been corrected online.
No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Arbitral Award of Oct. 3, 1899 (Guy. v. Venez.) (Decision on Jurisdiction) (I.C.J.)—Corrigendum
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 April 2022
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Corrigendum
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The American Society of International Law
References
REFERENCES
Plant, Brendan, “Introductory Note to Arbitral Award of Oct. 3, 1899 (Guy. v. Venez.) (Decision on Jurisdiction) (I.C.J.),” ILM 60 (2021), 1112-1162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2021.50.Google Scholar
Gómez, Simón and Mogollón, Moisés A. Montiel, A Commentary on the Arbitral Award of 3 October 1899 (Guyana v. Venezuela) jurisdiction ruling: The road to hell is paved with good intentions, Opinio Juris (Feb. 19, 2021), http://opiniojuris.org/2021/02/19/a-commentary-on-the-arbitral-award-of-3-october-1899-guyana-v-venezuela-jurisdiction-ruling-the-road-to-hell-is-paved-with-good-intentions/.Google Scholar
This correction applies to the following article(s):
You have
Access